Usefulness of positron emission tomography for assessing the response of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer

Predictive values of the hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet score (HALP) and the modified -Gustave Roussy immune score for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy

The hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet (HALP) score and the Gustave Roussy immune score (GRIm⁃Score) are prognostic markers in several types of malignant tumors. The prognostic values of HALP score and GRIm⁃Score in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable esophageal cancer remain unknown.

METHODS

We enrolled 150 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy in our institution between 2013 and 2018. The cutoff values for HALP, and GRIm⁃Score were defined by using receiver's operating characteristic curves. Survival was analyzed with the Kaplan- Meier method, with differences analyzed with the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of HALP and GRIm for ESCC.

RESULTS

HALP was significantly associated with the Zubrod ECOG WHO performance status, tumor location, and the clinical tumor, node, metastasis stage. Modified GRIm (mGRIm) was only significantly associated with metastasis / recurrence before radiotherapy (χ2 = 6.25). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that higher mGRIm (HR 1.9 95%CI 1.3-2.9) and lower HALP (HR 2.4 95%CI 1.6-3.7) were all associated with worse OS. Multivariate COX analysis found that higher mGRIm score (HR 1.7 95%CI 1.1-2.6), and lower HALP score (HR 2 95%CI 1.3-3.2) were both independent risk factors of overall survival. The nomogram c-index in inside validation was 0.66.

CONCLUSION

Both HALP and mGRIm are independent prognostic factors for patients with unresectable ESCC.

Circulating Tumor Cells in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma - Mini Review

Esophageal cancer has high incidence and mortality rates and a low five-year survival rate of <15% owing to its strong capabilities of invasion, relapse and metastasis. The classic view holds that metastasis and diffusion is an advanced event during cancer progression, but recent studies show that distant diffusion of primary cancer cells may actually be an early event. Detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the circulation may indicate tumor spread, so CTCs are considered to be the key factor of metastatic cascade. In recent years, despite research progress on CTCs, there is a lack of systematic and important evidence to confirm the diagnostic, monitoring and prognostic values of CTCs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In this review, we clarify the relationship between CTC values and ESCC and provide more reliable evidence to improve the management and treatment of ESCC.

Esophageal Cancer: Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging

Esophageal cancer is an uncommon malignancy that ranks sixth in terms of mortality worldwide. Squamous cell carcinoma is the predominant histologic subtype worldwide whereas adenocarcinoma represents the majority of cases in North America, Australia, and Europe. Esophageal cancer is staged using the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the International Union for Cancer Control TNM system and has separate classifications for the clinical, pathologic, and postneoadjuvant pathologic stage groups. The determination of clinical TNM is based on complementary imaging modalities, including esophagogastroduodenoscopy/endoscopic ultrasound; endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration; computed tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis; and fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography.

Esophageal cancer associated with a sarcoid-like reaction and systemic sarcoidosis in lymph nodes: supportive findings of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography during neoadjuvant therapy

Background

In patients with esophageal cancer, differentiation between lymph node metastasis and lymphadenopathies from sarcoidosis or sarcoid-like reactions of lymph nodes is clinically important. Herein, we report two esophageal cancer cases with lymph node involvement of sarcoid-like reaction or sarcoidosis.

Case presentation

One patient received chemotherapy and the other chemoradiotherapy as initial treatments. In both cases, [¹⁸F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) was performed before and after chemo(radio)therapy. After the treatment, FDG uptake was not detected in the primary tumor, but it was slightly reduced in the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes in both cases. These non-identical responses to chemo(radio)therapy suggest the presence of sarcoid-like reaction of lymph nodes associated with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Curative surgical resection was performed as treatment.

Conclusions

These FDG-PET/CT findings may be helpful to distinguish between metastasis and sarcoidosis-associated lymphadenopathy in esophageal cancer.

Prognostic significance of PET assessment of metabolic response to therapy in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Objectives:

The role of maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) at baseline and after induction chemotherapy (CT) on positron emission tomography (PET) as an imaging biomarker has not been well established in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). In this retrospective analysis, we investigated the prognostic significance of various PET metrics in oesophageal SCC patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

Methods:

A total of 57 patients were treated with CRT; 52 patients received induction chemotherapy and 10 patients underwent surgery following CRT. Scans were independently analysed by a nuclear medicine physician blinded to patient outcome. Using region of interest analysis, SUVmax and metabolic tumour volume (MTV) were calculated for the index lesion and lymph node metastases in each patient. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to evaluate overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess correlation between outcomes and PET metrics.

Results:

Median follow-up for those who are alive was 4.4 years, with a median survival for all patients of 2.9 years. The 3-year OS, DFS, DMFS and LRFS rates were 47, 40, 44 and 36%, respectively. Using a pre-established cutoff of a 35% decrease in SUVmax from baseline to post-induction PET, 3-year OS for responders (⩾35% decrease from baseline) was 64%, whereas non-responders (<35% decrease from baseline) had a 3-year OS of 15% (P=0.004).

Conclusions:

The pre-specified 35% decrease in SUVmax after induction chemotherapy was prognostic for OS. Baseline and post-induction PET metrics provide prognostic information for oesophageal SCC.

Appropriateness criteria of FDG PET/CT in oncology

(18)Fluorine-2-fluoro-2-Deoxy-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) is a well-established functional imaging method widely used in oncology. In this article, we have incorporated the various indications for (18)FDG PET/CT in oncology based on available evidence and current guidelines. Growing body of evidence for use of (18)FDG PET/CT in select tumors is also discussed. This article attempts to give the reader an overview of the appropriateness of using (18)F-FDG PET/CT in various malignancies.

Oesophageal cancer: assessment of tumour response to chemoradiotherapy with tridimensional CT

PURPOSE

To investigate whether changes in tumour volume were predictive of histopathological response to neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-five consecutive patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer were treated with chemoradiotherapy and surgery in responders from July 2007 to July 2009. Tumour volume (TV) was calculated using innovative tumour volume estimation software which analysed computed tomography (CT) data. Tumour diameter and area were also evaluated. Variations in tumour measurements following neoadjuvant treatment were compared with the histopathological data.

RESULTS

Median baseline tumour diameter, area and volume were 3.51 cm (range 1.67-6.61), 7.51 cm(2) (range 1.79-21.0) and 33.80 cm(3) (range 3.36-101.6), respectively. Differences in TV between the pre- and post-treatment values were significantly correlated with the pathological stage (τ = 0.357, p = 0.004) and the tumour regression grade index (τ = 0.368, p = 0.005). According to the receiver operating characteristic analysis, TV measurements following treatment had moderate predictive values for the pathological T stage (area under the curve, AUC = 0.742, sensitivity = 55.56 %, specificity = 92.86 %, p = 0.005).Comparison of pathological and radiological volume showed a good precision (Pearson rho 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in TV calculated on CT scans have a limited role in predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment in oesophageal cancer patients. New imaging techniques based on metabolic imaging may provide better results.

Value of CT–PET after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in the prediction of histological tumour regression, nodal status and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma

Background

The role of CT–PET after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) for prediction of pathological response and oncological outcome in oesophageal and junctional adenocarcinoma (OAC) is unclear. The relationship between complete metabolic response (cMR), pathological complete response (pCR) and nodal status has not been clarified.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced OAC selected to receive nCRT and surgery with curative intent, on the basis of staging that included CT–PET positivity, were included. Repeat scanning (PET2) with an identical protocol was performed 2–4 weeks after completion of nCRT (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil plus 44 Gy radiation). Changes in [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, considered as either a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) or a relative reduction (%ΔSUVmax), and PET-predicted nodal status following nCRT were compared with histopathological response, histological node positivity and survival.

Results

One hundred consecutive patients with PET-positive OAC were studied. Following nCRT, PET2 identified M1 disease in 2·0 per cent of patients. There were no significant associations between PET2 SUVmax or %ΔSUVmax with respect to primary tumour stage (ypT) (P = 0.216 and P = 0·975 respectively), tumour regression grade (P = 0·109 and P = 0·232), pCR (P = 0·633 and P = 0·870) or complete resection (R0) (P = 0·440 and P = 0·235). The sensitivity of PET2 for ypN was 10 per cent. %ΔSUVmax was not associated with disease-free or overall survival (P = 0·162 and P = 0·154 respectively). Of 46 patients with a cMR on PET2, 37 (80 per cent) had histological evidence of residual tumour in the resected specimen, and cMR was not associated with overall survival benefit (P = 0·478).

Conclusion

CT–PET following nCRT for OAC has poor prognostic and discriminatory value for clinical application.

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to investigate the value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography performed after definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced oesophageal carcinoma.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography at baseline and after chemoradiotherapy completion. Assessment of the clinical complete response to chemoradiotherapy included oesophagoscopy plus biopsies and computed tomography scan. Cox regression analysis was used to develop the univariate and multivariate models describing the association of the independent variables with survival and local control.

RESULTS

A clinical complete response and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography response were present in 29 patients (72.5%) and 13 patients (32.5%), respectively. A combined response was observed in 11 patients (27.5%). During follow-up, a local failure was detected in 27.2% of patients with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography response versus 33.3% in non-responders (p=.9). In multivariate analysis, clinical complete response (HR 5.77, p=.009) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography response (HR 6.27, p=.031) were identified as independent prognostic factors of overall survival.

CONCLUSION

In patients treated for an esophageal cancer, the present study suggested that 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography after chemoradiotherapy completion was an independent prognostic factor of overall survival without significant impact on local recurrence prediction.

Accuracy of PET-CT in predicting survival in patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Positron emission tomography (PET) is an integral part of tumor staging for patients with esophageal cancer. Recent studies suggest a role for PET scan in predicting survival in these patients, but this relationship is unclear in the setting of neoadjuvant therapy. We examined pretreatment maximum standard uptake value (SUV(max)) of the primary tumor in patients treated with and without neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

All patients undergoing esophagectomy with a preoperative PET scan over a nine-year period (2001-2010) were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Positron emission tomography data were obtained from computers housing the original PET scans. Overall survival was correlated with SUV(max) of the primary tumor.

RESULTS

A total of 191 patients were identified, and 103 patients met inclusion criteria. Eighty-two had an adenocarcinoma (80%), and 21 (20%) had a squamous cell carcinoma. Fifty-seven (55%) patients received neoadjuvant therapy. In the surgery alone group, a SUV(max) of > 5.0 in the primary tumor was associated with poor prognosis [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.32; p = 0.007], but this factor did not retain its significance on multivariate analysis (HR 0.65; p = 0.43). Pretreatment SUV(max) in patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy was not significant in predicting overall survival (p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not support the use of SUV(max) on pretreatment PET scans as a prognostic tool for patients with esophageal cancer, especially in those who have received neoadjuvant therapy. Lymph node status is a more accurate predictor of outcome, and efforts to improve pretreatment staging should focus on this factor.

PET and PET-CT in esophageal and gastric cancer

Esophageal cancer ranks among the ten most common malignancies in the world and is a frequent cause of cancer-related death. Almost all therapeutic modalities for esophageal cancer are associated with considerable mortality and morbidity. Consequently, there has been growing concern regarding effective management of esophageal cancer. Imaging plays an important role in the initial selection of patients. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) is playing an increasing role in the management of esophageal cancer. The role of FDG-PET in diagnosis, preoperative staging, monitoring of response to neoadjuvant therapy, and detection of disease recurrence is evaluated in this chapter.

Prediction of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal cancer with use of 18F FDG PET: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To systematically review the accuracy of fluorine 18 ((18)F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in the prediction of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for relevant studies. Methodologic quality of the included studies was assessed. Sensitivities and specificities of (18)F FDG PET in individual studies were calculated and underwent meta-analysis with a random effects model. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC) was constructed with the Moses-Shapiro-Littenberg method. A chi(2) test was performed to test for heterogeneity (defined as P < .10). Potential sources for heterogeneity were explored by assessing whether certain covariates significantly (P < .05) influenced the relative diagnostic odds ratio.

RESULTS

Twenty reports, comprising a total of 849 patients with esophageal cancer, were included. Overall, the studies were of moderate methodologic quality. Sensitivity and specificity of (18)F FDG PET ranged from 33% to 100% and from 30% to 100%, respectively, with pooled estimates of 67% (95% confidence interval: 62%, 72%) and 68% (95% confidence interval: 64%, 73%), respectively. The area under the sROC curve was 0.7815. There was significant heterogeneity in both the sensitivity and specificity of the included studies (P < .0001). Spearman rho between the logit of sensitivity and the logit of 1-specificity was 0.086 (P = .719), which suggested that there was no threshold effect. Studies performed outside of the United States and studies of higher methodologic quality yielded significantly higher overall accuracy.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of current evidence, (18)F FDG PET should not yet be used in routine clinical practice to guide neoadjuvant therapy decisions in patients with esophageal cancer.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.09091324/-/DC1.

Early response evaluation and prediction in neoadjuvant-treated patients with esophageal cancer

Since the introduction of multimodal therapy regimens, the prognosis of esophageal cancer has improved. There is undoubtedly true for patients with surgically resected tumors in the case of a response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation. Important conclusions can be drawn from this regarding the indication for perioperative therapies, the radicality of surgery, or the surgical indications. Thus, most of the current research in this field is aimed at the early identification of this subset of patients, at the beginning of, or even before, neoadjuvant treatment. Conventional staging tools have failed to predict responses to neoadjuvant therapy. However, molecular imaging methods, e.g. positron emission tomography (PET)-scans, have shown promising results in the early selection of responders and non-responders during the course of neoadjuvant therapy, allowing physicians to alter the treatment plan accordingly. Even more desirable is the identification of potential responders before the start of neoadjuvant therapy. Preliminary molecular data on biopsy specimens demonstrate the possibility of early response prediction in these patients. We present the current knowledge on response evaluation and prediction in esophageal cancer and draw conclusions for future clinical practice and studies in this review.

Positron emission tomography’s changing significance in the treatment of esophageal cancer

Incidence of esophageal cancer has been rising, and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is one tool that has shown utility and promise as a tool for staging, treatment response, and prognosis. PET delivery has evolved over time and is now frequently registered with a CT scan at the time of acquisition. However, resolution and confounders such as post-treatment radiation changes may limit clinical utility. PET has been shown to be helpful in staging, especially in evaluating for distant metastases. PET acquired after chemoradiation may give important prognostic information that can guide additional treatment decisions. Studies have had substantial variability in recommendations for the timing and manner of using PET for this purpose, and additional study is needed.

Prognostic significance of SUV on PET/CT in patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Esophageal cancer is the third most common gastrointestinal malignancy with a poor long-term survival and high mortality. Surgical resection provides the only chance of cure. The tumor-node metastasis stage classification system is a strong prognostic parameter predicting the prognosis. We performed the present meta-analysis to comprehensively review the evidence for use of standardized uptake value (SUV) measured on tumor to predict prognosis of esophageal cancer.

METHODS

We searched for articles published in English or Chinese; limited to esophageal cancer; F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose (F-FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography (PET) performed on a dedicated device; dealt with the impact of SUV on survival. We extracted an estimate of the log hazard ratios (HR) and their variances and performed meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Without the study dealt by the pretreatment SUV measured on metastasis sites, there were seven studies dealt by the prognostic value of SUV measured on FDG-PET for overall survival. The combined HR was 1.86, meaning that high SUV indicated worse survival prognosis; and there were three studies dealt with the prognostic value of SUV measured on FDG-PET for disease-free survival. The combined HR was 2.52, indicating that high SUV was associated with more significantly higher risk for recurrence than low SUV.

CONCLUSION

SUV measured in patients with esophageal cancer, reflecting the metabolic activity of tumor and malignancy, could serve as a prognostic factor. Considering that the FDG-PET can add important information of metabolism in detection and staging to conventional imaging modality, we anticipate that SUV could be used in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

The clinical application of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to predict survival in patients with operable esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Metabolic tumor activity using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) was believed to have a predictive value for patient outcome in malignancies. The objective of the current study was to assess the prognostic effectiveness of the highest standardized uptake value (SUV) in the primary or regional area (peak SUV) and the number of PET-positive lymph nodes in esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed their experience with 184 consecutive esophageal cancer patients imaged preoperatively using FDG-PET scanning.

RESULTS

The median peak SUV was 4.5 (range, 1.4-21.9). The survival curve was analyzed using the median peak SUV as the cutoff value. Comparison of each group and clinicopathologic characteristics revealed significant associations between peak SUV and each of the following factors: tumor status (P < .001), lymph node status (P < .001), metastatic status (P < .05), stage of disease (P < .001), number of PET-positive lymph nodes (P < .001), and the number of histologically positive lymph nodes (P < .001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate for patients having FDG uptake with a peak SUV > or =4.5 was 47% and that for patients with a peak SUV <4.5 was 76% (P < .0001). On multivariate survival analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model, peak SUV and the number of PET-positive lymph nodes were found to be independent predictive factors for OS. The number of PET-positive lymph nodes was a single prognostic factor predicting both disease-free survival and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment PET cannot only potentially diagnose the extent of disease, but also may be predictive of patient survival after esophageal cancer resection.

2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging evaluation of esophageal cancer

We evaluated the clinical utility of 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) on the precise localization of pathologic foci and exclusion of normal variants in the imaging evaluation of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Combined PET/CT scans were performed in 60 patients (50 males, 10 females, age range 47-84 years) with history of esophageal carcinoma either at the time of initial diagnosis (group I, n=14) or for surveillance and/or detection of recurrent and metastatic disease (group II, n=46). Prior treatments included esophagectomy with gastric pull-up (n=23), surgery and chemotherapy (n=3), surgery and chemoradiation therapy (n=10), chemotherapy alone (n=5), radiation therapy alone (n=2), and chemoradiation without surgery (n=3). Diagnostic validation was by tissue sampling in three patients and clinical/radiological follow-up for up to 1.5 years in the remaining patients. In group I, discordant abnormalities were noted in seven patients. PET demonstrated hypermetabolism in normal-size lymph nodes on CT in three patients that were considered likely true positive in view of concurrent existence of other adjacent enlarged hypermetabolic lymph nodes in the same nodal basin. Hypometabolic incidental CT abnormalities of up to 1-cm lung nodules were noted in three patients and pleural effusion in one patient, which were considered true negative in view of no change on follow-up PET/CT studies. In group II, both PET and CT showed concordant abnormalities in 23 patients. The precise image fusion of hypermetabolism in a liver lesion allowed a diagnostic CT-guided biopsy in one patient. PET demonstrated true positive hypermetabolic abnormalities in four patients that localized to structures, which were normal by noncontrast CT criteria, and true negative in one patient with hepatic fatty deposits. PET showed decline in metabolic activity of the primary lesion in one patient after chemotherapy, while the corresponding CT abnormality remained unchanged. PET/CT image fusion provided relevant complementary diagnostic information in 14 patients with discordant findings (23% of total) that resulted in biopsy in three cases, institution of chemotherapy in four cases, and a wait-and-watch strategy in seven cases. In conclusion, our findings add to the current body of literature that suggests that FDG-PET/CT scanning may improve the imaging evaluation of patients with esophageal cancer by providing complementary structural-metabolic information. In particular, our findings support the notion that PET/CT may be the most appropriate imaging modality in the evaluation of patients of esophageal cancer that may impact patient management.

Impact of fluorodeoxyglucose PET on the management of esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is the third most common malignancy of the alimentary tract. The incidence of esophageal cancer has steadily increased over the past three decades. Almost all therapeutic modalities for esophageal cancer are associated with a considerable mortality and morbidity. Consequently, there has been growing concern regarding effective management of esophageal cancer. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) is playing an increasing role in the management of esophageal cancer, offering potential advantages in the accuracy of disease assessment at a number of decision points in the management pathway. This review evaluates the critical role of FDG-PET in (i) diagnosis, (ii) preoperative staging, (iii) monitoring of response to neoadjuvant therapy, (iv) assessment of recurrence and (v) prediction of prognosis of esophageal cancer. We have also compared diagnostic performance of FDG-PET and other current technologies such as computed tomography scan and endoscopic ultrasonography based on available evidence.

Positron emission tomography for monitoring response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma

AIMS

The aim of this review is to consolidate our knowledge on an important and rapidly expanding area of expertise. Numerous methods for predicting response (in terms of pathological response and survival) to neoadjuvant therapy (chemotherapy/chemo-radiotherapy) in oesophageal and junctional cancers have been proposed. This review concerns itself only with the use of positron emission tomography for such a purpose. At present there are no standardised criteria amongst PET trials as to what determines a response according to PET, what is the optimal time to perform PET in relation to the timing of neoadjuvant therapy, and what is the ideal method of quantifying PET tracer uptake.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed of PubMed, Ovid and Embase websites to identify studies, in the English language, using the search terms: PET; oesophageal; oesophago-gastric; survival; cancer; response; chemotherapy and chemo-radiotherapy. The reference lists were searched manually to identify further relevant studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were identified, all using (18)FDG as the tracer, using PET to predict response in terms of pathological response and survival following neoadjuvant therapy (chemotherapy/chemo-radiotherapy). PET had a varying degree of success in predicting both pathological response and survival outcomes, with only one study using PET to influence management decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

PET seems a promising technique, but large-scale conclusions are hindered by small study numbers, lack of criteria as to what constitutes a response and markedly differing PET imaging times. A large randomised trial concerning a homogeneous group of patients and tumours is required before PET might be used to influence management.

International survey on esophageal cancer: part II staging and neoadjuvant therapy

The outcome of esophagectomy could be improved by optimal diagnostic strategies leading to adequate preoperative patient selection. Neoadjuvant therapy could improve outcome by increasing the number of radical resections and by controlling metastatic disease. The purposes of this study were to gain insight into the current worldwide practice of staging modalities and neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer, and to detect intercontinental differences. Surgeons with particular interest in esophageal surgery, including members of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, the European Society of Esophagology - Group d'Etude Européen des Maladies de l'Oesophage, and the OESO, were invited to participate in an online questionnaire. Questions were asked regarding staging modalities, neoadjuvant therapy, and response evaluation applied in esophageal cancer patients. Of 567 invited surgeons, 269 participated resulting in a response rate of 47%. The responders currently performing esophagectomies (n= 250; 44%) represented 41 countries across the six continents. Esophagogastroscopy with biopsy and computed tomography (CT) scanning were routinely performed by 98% of responders for diagnosing and staging esophageal cancer, while endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and barium esophagography were routinely applied by 58% and 51%, respectively. Neoadjuvant therapy is routinely administered by 33% and occasionally by 63% of responders. Of the responders that administer identical neoadjuvant regimens to esophageal adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma, 54% favor chemoradiotherapy. For AC, chemotherapy is preferred by 31% of the responders that administer neoadjuvant therapy, whereas for squamous cell carcinoma, the majority of responders (38%) prefer chemoradiotherapy. Response to neoadjuvant therapy is predominantly assessed by CT scanning of the chest and abdomen (86%). Barium esophagography, EUS, and combined CT/PET scan are requested for response monitoring in equal frequency (25%). Substantial differences in applied staging modalities and neoadjuvant regimens were detected between surgeons from different continents. In conclusion, currently the most commonly applied diagnostic modalities for staging and restaging esophageal cancer are CT scanning of the chest and abdomen, gastroscopy, barium esophagography and EUS. Neoadjuvant therapy is routinely applied by one third of the responders. Intercontinental differences have been detected in the diagnostic modalities applied in esophageal cancer staging and in the administration of neoadjuvant therapy. The results of this survey provide baseline data for future research and for the development of international guidelines.

Lack of fludeoxyglucose F 18 uptake in posttreatment positron emission tomography as a significant predictor of survival after subsequent surgery in multimodality treatment for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy to improve survival, but benefits are observed only in those with histologic response. Positron emission tomography with fludeoxyglucose F 18 (INN fludeoxyglucose [(18)F]) detects accumulation of glucose analog in viable cancer cells. This study investigated the usefulness of positron emission tomography with fludeoxyglucose F 18 in assessment of response of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to neoadjuvant treatment to establish new criteria to predict postoperative long-term survival.

METHODS

Fifty patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant therapy (chemotherapy 35, chemoradiotherapy 15) underwent positron emission tomography with fludeoxyglucose F 18 before surgical resection in evaluation of posttreatment maximum standardized uptake value, residual tumor size (maximum square area of longitudinal axis), histologic response, and postoperative survival.

RESULTS

After treatment, uptake was not noted in 21 patients (posttreatment maximum standardized uptake value < 2.5, negative) but was detected in 29 (> or = 2.5, positive). Residual tumor size ranged from 0 to 54.0 mm(2) for negative results and 55.0 to 676.0 mm(2) for positive, clearly distinguishing histologic major response from nonresponse. The negative group demonstrated significantly higher 5-year cause-specific survival (67.7%) and lower hematogenous recurrence (4.8%) than the 36.5% and 37.0% values in the positive group, (P < .0042 and P = .0083, respectively). Univariate Cox regression analyses identified posttreatment maximum standardized uptake value (cutoff 2.5) as the only preoperative prognostic factor (P = .0071).

CONCLUSION

Posttreatment positron emission tomography with fludeoxyglucose F 18 reliably predicted histologic response and postoperative survival in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. This tool could potentially be used to tailor optimal treatment according to individual responses.

Positron emission tomography and pathological evidence of response to neoadjuvant therapy in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

Our aim was to determine if fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) could be correlated with a pathological response in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation therapy. Patients with resectable, histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were entered in the study. Preoperative chemotherapy comprised two cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Radiation therapy commenced with the second cycle on day 22. FDG-PET images were obtained pre-treatment and on completion of intended neo-adjuvant treatment. Quantification was achieved by the calculation of both standardized uptake values (SUV) and tumor/liver ratios (TLR). Evidence of histopathological response was identified according to the Mandard tumor regression scoring system. There were 45 patients, 22 receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 23 chemoradiation therapy. Forty patients underwent surgical resection. Seven patients (16%) had a histopathological response. The mean percentage change in SUV in the histological responders group was -56.8% (SD 29) and in the non-responders -27.8% (SD 32.1) (P = 0.035). The mean percentage change in TLR was -49.1% (SD 44.8) in the responders and in the non-responders -27.3% (SD 31.3) (P = 0.128). There was no difference between the two methods of assessment, however there was less variation with SUV. There was no correlation between the FDG-PET response and the histopathological response. Presently an FDG-PET scan performed 3-6 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus should not be used as a marker of the potential result of the treatment. The optimal timing of a second FDG-PET remains unclear.

PET/CT of esophageal cancer: its role in clinical management

Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has important utility and limitations in the initial staging of esophageal cancer, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant therapy, and detection of recurrent malignancy. Esophageal cancer is often treated by using a combined modality approach (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and esophagectomy); correct integration of PET/CT into the conventional work-up of esophageal cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach that combines the information from PET/CT with results of clinical assessment, diagnostic CT, endoscopic gastroduodenoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasonography. PET/CT has limited utility in T staging of esophageal cancer and relatively limited utility in detection of dissemination to locoregional lymph nodes. However, PET/CT allows detection of metastatic disease that may not be identifiable with other methods. PET/CT is not sufficiently reliable in the individual patient for determination of treatment response in the primary tumor. Interpretation of PET/CT results is optimized by understanding the diagnostic limitations and pitfalls that may be encountered, together with knowledge of the natural history of esophageal cancer and the staging and treatment options available.

The evaluation of esophageal adenocarcinoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Although neoadjuvant chemoradiation eradicates esophageal adenocarcinoma in a substantial proportion of patients, conventional imaging techniques cannot accurately detect this response. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is an emerging approach that may be well suited to fill this role. This pilot study evaluates the ability of this method to discriminate adenocarcinoma from normal esophageal tissue. Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and control subjects underwent scanning. Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy underwent pre- and postchemoradiation scans. Parameters were extracted for each pixel were Ktrans (equilibrium rate for transfer of contrast reagent across the vascular wall), ve (volume fraction of interstitial space), and taui (mean intracellular water lifetime). Five esophageal adenocarcinoma patients and two tumor-free control subjects underwent scanning. The mean Ktrans value was 5.7 times greater in esophageal adenocarcinoma, and taui is 2.0 times smaller, than in the control subjects. Ktrans decreased by 11.4-fold after chemoradiation. Parametric maps qualitatively demonstrate a difference in Ktrans. DCE MRI of the esophagus is feasible. Ktrans, a parameter that has demonstrated discriminative ability in other malignancies, also shows promise in differentiating esophageal adenocarcinoma from benign tissue. The determination of Ktrans represents an in vivo assay for endothelial permeability and thus may serve as a quantitative measure of response to induction chemoradiation.

FDG-PET Evaluation of Response to Treatment

This article discusses evaluating response after and during therapy in various settings and for the types of cancers for which ample evidence demonstrates that PET imaging with flourodeoxyglucose provides a valuable surrogate for response to therapy. It also briefly discusses pitfalls in obtaining an optimal assessment of response and issues that need further attention for this modality to become established as an independent predictor of response to anticancer therapy.

PET/CT and hepatic radiation injury in esophageal cancer patients

This paper evaluates the imaging appearance of radiation injury in the liver on positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in patients with distal esophageal cancer who underwent pre-operative chemoradiation therapy. Twenty-six patients with distal esophageal cancer who received chemoradiotherapy before esophagectomy were included. All patients had baseline and follow-up PET/CT. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in both left and right lobes of the liver was evaluated. CT findings suggesting radiation damage were documented. Abnormal FDG uptake in the liver was observed in 5 (19%) patients after therapy. These abnormalities were in the left lobe (12%) and right lobe (12%) of the liver. In the irradiated left lobe, FDG uptake increased focally greater than 50% over baseline in two patients (54% and 133%); in one of these patients, biopsy confirmed radiation injury. In the non-irradiated right lobe, standard uptake values (SUV) increased diffusely in two different patients. In one patient, SUV decreased by at least 50% in both the right and left lobes. In the remaining patients, there were no significant changes in FDG uptake. Atrophy and attenuation changes of irradiated liver on CT were found in 15 (58%) patients. In patients receiving chemoradiotherapy, PET/CT may identify metabolic abnormalities in irradiated liver. Such abnormalities should be correlated with other imaging, clinical and laboratory findings to avoid confusion with hepatic metastases.

FDG-PET/CT tumor segmentation-derived indices of metabolic activity to assess response to neoadjuvant therapy and progression-free survival in esophageal cancer: correlation with histopathology results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic abilities of PET tumor segmentation-derived indices of metabolic activity for the assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and progression-free survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with histologically confirmed esophageal cancer were retrospectively evaluated. The patients underwent PET-CT imaging before and after completion of neoadjuvant therapy. Images were evaluated visually and quantitatively with a three-dimensional threshold-based region-growing program, which calculates SUVm, SUVa of the entire tumor, metabolic tumor length (Lm) and volume (Vm) before and after therapy (SUVm1, SUVm2, SUVa1, SUVa2, Lm1, Lm2, Vm1, and Vm2, respectively). Percentage changes in these metabolic variables before and after therapy were also calculated (%SUVm, %SUVa, %Lm, %Vm, respectively).

RESULTS

SUVm1 (P = 0.018), SUVa1 (P = 0.019), Lm1 (P = 0.016), and Vm1 (P = 0.016) correlated with T-status. Advanced stage tumors (T3 + T4) had significantly higher glucose metabolism, metabolic length, and volume. Moreover, Lm1 >47.4 mm and Vm1 >29 cm3 were the best predictors of the level of tumor invasiveness. SUVm1 >12.7 and SUVa1 >5.9 could differentiate patients with positive lymph nodes from those without at presentation. %SUVa >32.3% and the SUVa1 >5.5 proved to be reliable predictors of pathologic response. SUVa2 >3.55 and SUVm2 >4.35 were the best predictors of disease progression during follow-up, with the latter having the best prognostic value.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that FDG-PET tumor segmentation-derived indices of metabolic activity play a definite role in the evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and progression-free survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Predicting the response of localised oesophageal cancer to neo-adjuvant chemoradiation

BACKGROUND

A complete pathological response to neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation for oesophageal cancer is associated with favourable survival. However, such a benefit is seen in the minority. If one could identify, at diagnosis, those patients who were unlikely to respond unnecessary toxicity could be avoided and alternative treatment can be considered. The aim of this review was to highlight predictive markers currently assessed and evaluate their clinical utility.

METHODS

A systematic search of Pubmed and Google Scholar was performed using the following keywords; "neo-adjuvant", "oesophageal", "trimodality", "chemotherapy", "radiotherapy", "chemoradiation" and "predict". The original manuscripts were sourced for further articles of relevance.

RESULTS

Conventional indices including tumour stage and grade seem unable to predict histological response. Immuno-histochemical markers have been extensively studied, but none has made its way into routine clinical practice. Global gene expression from fresh pre-treatment tissue using cDNA microarray has only recently been assessed, but shows considerable promise. Molecular imaging using FDG-PET seems to be able to predict response after neo-adjuvant chemoradiation has finished, but there is a paucity of data when such imaging is performed earlier.

CONCLUSION

Currently there are no clinically useful predictors of response based on standard pathological assessment and immunohistochemistry. Genomics, proteomics and molecular imaging may hold promise.

The utility of positron emission tomography in staging of potentially operable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0060 trial

OBJECTIVES

The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group trial Z0060 is a prospective multi-institutional trial with a primary objective to evaluate whether positron emission tomography (PET) with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) detects evidence of metastastic disease that precludes esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer who are surgical candidates after routine staging.

METHODS

Patients with resectable, biopsy-proven carcinoma were enrolled after computed tomography of chest and abdomen demonstrated no evidence of metastasis. FDG-PET was performed according to specified standards. FDG-PET findings suggesting metastases required confirmation and patients without metastases on PET were expected to proceed to surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 262 patients were registered. Of these, 199 were deemed eligible and of these, 189 patients were evaluable. Seventy-three patients were ineligible or unevaluable. Reasons for ineligibility included nonresectable disease by routine staging (39), missing or outdated staging procedures (12), PET technical protocol violations (10), no cancer (4), pre-PET induction therapy (3), claustrophobia (1), and other causes (4). There were 145 (78%) patients who went on to have surgery, 42 (22%) who did not, and 2 patients for whom the surgical status was not determined. The reasons for no resection included the following: M1 disease found by PET and confirmed (9), M1 disease found by PET and not confirmed (2), M1 disease at exploration not found by PET (7), decline or death before surgery (10), patient refusal of surgery (7), unresectable local tumor at exploration (5), and extensive N1 disease precluding operation (2). Eight (4.2%) patients undergoing resection had a recurrence in the first 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although 22% of eligible patients did not undergo esophagectomy, FDG-PET after standard clinical staging for esophageal carcinoma identified confirmed M1b disease in at least 4.8% (95% confidence interval: 2.2%-8.9%) of patients before resection. Unconfirmed PET evidence of M1 disease and regional adenopathy (N1 disease) led to definitive nonsurgical or induction therapy in additional patients.

Role of positron emission tomography in the (re-)staging of oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Various studies have demonstrated that 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), measuring altered tissue glucose metabolism, is a promising non-invasive method for detecting both distant nodal and haematogenous metastases in patients with oesophageal carcinoma (OC) and might thus prevent futile esophagectomy. Moreover, FDG-PET is a promising tool in assessing response to non-surgical treatment, and might therefore be used for an early decision on whether treatment should be stopped or continued.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Review of the recent literature regarding the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET in the preoperative staging of patients with OC and regarding diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET in assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with OC compared to conventional techniques (especially computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)).

RESULTS

A search of the literature resulted in the inclusion of 16 studies on the diagnostic value of FDG-PET. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of locoregional metastases were moderate. Sensitivity and specificity were reasonable for distant metastases. The diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET in assessing response to treatment was similar to the accuracy of EUS, but significantly higher than that of CT.

CONCLUSIONS

The staging value of FDG-PET in OC patients is limited in the detection of locoregional metastases; however; its value is higher in the detection of distant lymphatic and haematogenous metastases. Moreover, FDG-PET is a valuable tool for the non-invasive assessment of histopathologic tumour response after neoadjuvant therapy..

The role of integrated computed tomography positron-emission tomography in esophageal cancer: staging and assessment of therapeutic response

Computed tomography (CT) and endoscopy/endoscopic ultrasonography are usually performed to initially stage patients with esophageal cancer, to determine primary tumor response, and to detect nodal and distant metastases after preoperative therapy. Positron-emission tomography (PET) with [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and integrated CT-PET are useful in the initial staging of patients with esophageal cancer as well as in the prediction of pathologic response, disease-free interval, and overall survival after preoperative therapy. Importantly, integrated CT-PET imaging decreases the number of futile attempts at surgical resection, mainly because of the detection of occult distant metastases. The following sections review the use of integrated CT-PET imaging in determining the T, N, and M descriptors of the American Joint Commission on Cancer's 2002 guidelines for pathologic and clinical staging at initial diagnosis and after chemoradiation therapy in those patients being considered for surgical resection.

Detection of interval distant metastases

BACKGROUND

The objective of the study was to determine the utility of integrated computed tomography / positron emission tomography (CT-PET) imaging for detecting interval distant metastases and assessing therapeutic response in patients with locally advanced, potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of 88 patients with potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma who received neoadjuvant therapy before planned surgical resection. CT-PET before and after completion of neoadjuvant was used for evaluating therapeutic response; response criteria were based on qualitative and semiquantitative analyses.

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant therapy comprised chemoradiotherapy in 85 patients, with prior induction chemotherapy in 39 patients. Fifty-five patients proceeded to esophagectomy. Repeat CT-PET was performed after induction chemotherapy (n = 23) and after completing chemoradiotherapy (n = 85). CT-PET identified the interval appearance of metastatic disease in 7 (8%) patients. For assessment of locoregional therapeutic response, CT-PET was unable to predict pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy in the primary tumor or locoregional lymph nodes. CT-PET had sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 57%, 46%, 39%, and 64%, respectively, for detection of residual macroscopic malignancy within the primary tumor; and sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 0%, 90%, 0%, and 69% for detection of residual malignancy within resected lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-PET performed after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma is important for detecting interval metastases that preclude surgical resection, but is of limited utility for assessing locoregional therapeutic response.

Evolving role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of esophageal carcinoma

Positron emission tomography (PTE) and PET/CT imaging with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose are metabolic imaging modalities that depict tissues based on their level of glucose uptake. PET provides useful information in the primary staging of disease. PET performance in detecting locoregional nodal metastases is limited; however, it is the most accurate single noninvasive modality for detecting distant metastases. It is the imaging modality of choice for whole-body scanning in high-risk patients or patients who have clinically suspected recurrence, and is particularly helpful in determining which patients are the best candidates for surgical cure.

(18)FDG uptake during induction chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer fails to predict histomorphological tumour response

To determine whether [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) could predict the pathological response in oesophageal cancer after only the first week of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Thirty-two patients with localised oesophageal cancer had a pretreatment PET scan and a repeat after the first week of chemoradiation. The change in mean maximum standardised uptake value (SUV) and volume of metabolically active tissue (MTV) was compared with the tumour regression grade (TRG) in the final histology. Those who achieved a TRG of 1 and 2 were deemed responders and 3-5 nonresponders. In the responders (28%), the SUV fell from 12.6 (+/-6.3) to 8.1 (+/-2.9) after 1 week of chemoradiation (P=0.070). In nonresponders (72%), the results were 9.7 (+/-5.4) and 7.1 (+/-3.8), respectively (P=0.003). The MTV in responders fell from 36.6 (+/-22.7) to 22.3 (+/-10.4) cm(3) (P=0.180), while in nonresponders, this fell from 35.9 (+/-36.7) to 31.9 (+/-52.7) cm(3) (P=0.405). There were no significant differences between responders and nonresponders. The hypothesis that early repeat FDG-PET scanning may predict histomorphologic response was not proven. This may reflect an inflammatory effect of radiation that obscures tumour-specific metabolic changes at this time. This assessment may have limited application in predicting response to multimodal regimens for oesophageal cancer.

Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability of Standardized Uptake Value Measurements in Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To assess interobserver and intraobserver variabilities in measuring the maximal standardized uptake value (SUV) of non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography examinations of 20 consecutive patients referred for initial evaluation of newly diagnosed non-small-cell lung cancer were retrospectively reviewed by 5 experienced positron emission tomography-computed tomography readers, who independently measured the maximal SUV/body weight of the primary tumors. Interobserver and intraobserver variabilities were assessed by using 4 statistical methods: correlation, regression analysis, Bland-Altman analysis, and analysis of variance. The SUV measurements derived in the study were compared with the SUV measurements documented in the original reports using correlation and regression analysis. The percentages of tumors whose retrospective SUV measurements were more than 20% different and more than 25% different from those in the original report were assessed.

RESULTS

Both interobserver and intraobserver SUV measurements were highly reproducible. Pearson correlation coefficients were greater than 0.95 and 0.94, respectively. Good interobserver and intraobserver agreement was shown with regression analysis (F test P value >0.05), the Bland-Altman analysis, and analysis of variance (F test P value >0.95). The mean original SUV was much less than the mean study SUV (P<0.05). The study SUV differed from the SUV of the original report by more than 20% in 50% of the tumors, and by more than 25% in 45% of the tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

There was excellent interobserver and intraobserver agreement in SUVs measured in the study environment but poor agreement between study SUVs and those documented in original reports, which can affect treatment decisions substantially.

The clinical impact of histopathologic response assessment by residual tumor cell quantification in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to investigate histomorphologic features as a response classification after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RTx/CTx) and to correlate the results with clinical outcome parameters (e.g., postoperative morbidity and mortality, recurrence, and survival) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Three hundred eleven patients with histologically proven, locally advanced, intrathoracic ESCC (clinical T3 or T4, N0-N+, M0) located at or above the level of the tracheal bifurcation underwent preoperative, combined, simultaneous RTx/CTx followed by esophagectomy. Response to RTx/CTx was classified by the quantification of residual tumor cells. A histopathologic response was defined as <10% residual tumor cells found within the specimen compared with a histopathologic nonresponse, which was characterized by >10% residual tumor cells.

RESULTS

A histopathologic response was correlated significantly with complete tumor resection status (R0 resection) (P .0001), histopathologic tumor (ypT) category (P <.0001), lymph node involvement (P <.0001), lymphatic vessel invasion (P <.001), and survival (P <.0001). A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that histopathologic response classification according to the percentage of residual tumor cells was an independent prognostic factor (P <.0001). Nonresponders had greater postoperative pulmonary morbidity (P = .01), a greater 30-day mortality rate (P = .02), and a dismal survival rate compared to histopathologic responders (P <.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathologic response evaluation based on the quantification of residual tumor cells provided meaningful information for the assessment of outcomes among patients with ESCC who have underwent neoadjuvant RTx/CTx. The current results indicated that histopathologic responders may represent a subgroup of patients who benefit from neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery.