[Facial paralysis after temporal bone trauma]

Facial Nerve Trauma: Clinical Evaluation and Management Strategies

The field of facial paralysis requires the reconstructive surgeon to apply a wide spectrum of reconstructive and aesthetic principles, using a comprehensive array of surgical tools, including microsurgery, peripheral nerve surgery, and aesthetic facial surgery on the road to optimize patient outcomes. The distinct deficits created by different anatomical levels of facial nerve injury require a fundamental understanding of facial nerve anatomy. Palsy duration, followed by location and mechanism, will determine mimetic muscle salvageability, by means of either direct repair, grafting, or nerve transfers, whereas longer palsy durations will necessitate introducing a new neuromuscular unit, whether by muscle transfer or free functional muscle transplant. A thorough history, physical examination, and basic understanding of ancillary studies, emphasizing palsy duration, location, and mechanism of injury, are critical in evaluation, prognostication, and treatment strategies in traumatic facial palsy patients. The importance of ancillary and aesthetic procedures cannot be overstated. Although these do not provide motion, they constitute essential tools in the treatment of facial paralysis, providing both protective and improved aesthetic outcomes, yielding the highest impact in final surgeon and patient satisfaction, bringing our patients to smile not only on the outside, but also on the inside.

Geniculate ganglion decompression of facial nerve by transmastoid-epitympanum approach

CONCLUSIONS

We consider that the transmastoid-epitympanum approach to decompression of the geniculate ganglion, without a craniotomy, combining the advantages of middle cranial fossa and transmastoid extralabyrinthine approaches, is simple, minimally invasive, safe, and effective, with little postoperative hearing change. It can be employed in some cases of facial palsy due to temporal bone fracture (TBF) and middle ear cholesteatoma (MEC) in accordance with the range of facial paralysis, facial nerve electrophysiology, and imaging guidance.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of geniculate ganglion decompression of the facial nerve by the transmastoid-epitympanum approach.

METHODS

Thirty cases of facial palsy were reviewed, including patients with TBF and MEC. All the patients were evaluated by routine preoperative tests including high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), audiometry, and electroneuronography, and were treated by transmastoid-epitympanum decompression. The negative effects on auditory function were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean percentage facial function improvement (House-Brackmann grade I-II) was 88% in TBF and 100% in MEC. The negative effects on auditory function were less than 10 dB in most cases.