Less invasive arterial CABG on a beating heart

Multi-vessel coronary artery grafting: analyzing the minimally invasive approach and its safety

Introduction

At our institution, we perform off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) as a standard procedure. Moreover, patients with favorable coronary anatomy and condition are selected for minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS)-OPCAB. We retrospectively compared early outcomes, focusing on safety, between MICS-OPCAB and conventional off-pump techniques for multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods

From August 2017 to September 2022, 1,220 patients underwent multivessel coronary artery grafting at our institution. They were divided into the MICS-OPCAB group (MICS group = 163 patients) and the conventional OPCAB group (MS group = 1057 patients). Propensity score matching (1 : 1 ratio) was applied to the MICS-OPCAB and MS groups (149 patients per group) based on 23 preoperative clinical characteristics.

Results

After matching, there were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics between the groups. The MICS group had a lower total graft number (2.3 ± 0.6 vs. 2.9 ± 0.8, p < 0.001) and fewer distal anastomoses (2.7 ± 0.8 vs. 3.2 ± 0.9, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, postoperative complications, and 30-day mortality. The MICS group had less drain output (MICS 350 ml [250-500], MS 450 ml [300-550]; p = 0.013). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences in postoperative MACCE (major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events)-free and survival rates between the groups (MACCE-free rate p = 0.945, survival rate p = 0.374).

Conclusion

With proper patient selection, MICS-OPCAB can provide good short to mid-term results, similar to those of conventional OPCAB.

Off-pump minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: the lampang experience

Introduction

The minimally invasive cardiac surgery off-pump coronary artery bypass (MICSOPCAB) is technically difficult; therefore, previous studies have indicated that MICSOPCAB should be contraindicated in patients with impaired left ventricular (LV) function. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of MICSOPCAB in patients with impaired LV function.

Methods

The 226 patients underwent MICSOPCAB between August 2017 and September 2022. Our study defined impaired LV function as ejection fraction (EF) in echocardiography 40% or less. The patients were divided into Low EF group (n = 39) and Normal EF group (n = 187).

Results

The Low EF group was in a more critical preoperative condition than Normal EF group (41.0% in the Low EF group vs. 14.4% in the Normal EF group; p < 0.001). For preoperative transthoracic echocardiography, LV end-diastolic diameter (5.5 ± 0.9 cm in the Low EF group vs. 5.0 ± 0.8 cm in the Normal EF group; p < 0.001) and LV end-systolic diameter (4.4 ± 1.0 cm in the Low EF group vs. 3.4 ± 1.0 cm in the Normal EF group; p < 0.001) were significantly larger in the Low EF group. No differences were found in the operative time (180 [160-240] min in the Low EF group vs. 205 [165-253] min in the Normal EF group; p = 0.231) and the median number of distal anastomoses (2 [1-2] in the Low EF group vs. 2 [1-3] in the Normal EF group; p = 0.073). Intensive care unit stay was longer in the Low EF group than in the Normal EF group (2 [1-2] in the Low EF group vs. 1 [1-2] in the Normal EF group; p = 0.010). Perioperative transfusion was more common in the Low EF group than in the Normal EF group (69.7% vs. 49.2%; p = 0.023). There were no differences in major complications, hospital stay, and 30-day mortality. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed no significant difference in postoperative major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events rates between the two groups (p = 0.185).

Conclusion

In this study, MICSOPCAB can be performed in patients with low EF having short- and mid-term outcomes similar to patients with normal EF. Therefore, low EF should not be contraindicated in MICSOPCAB.

Total arterial revascularization using robot assisted minimally invasive coronary artery bypass: an Indian experience

Objective

The aim of this study is to analyze the early outcomes of Total Arterial Revascularization using Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass at our center between June 2019 and January 2023.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of 195 patients who underwent Total Arterial Coronary Revascularization through Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass procedure (RA-CABG) during the period of June 2019 and January 2023 in a quaternary care center in India. Primary outcome variables were in-hospital and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome variables included duration of surgery, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, in-hospital stay and perioperative morbidity. The entire patient population was divided into two groups for a subgroup analysis based on when the surgery was conducted i.e. the years since the robotic program was begun at our institution with 81 patients in group I (2019-2021), and 114 patients in group II (2022-2023).

Results

195 patients [88.7% male, mean age of 61.34 ± 9.58 years] underwent RA-CABG during the 5-year period (2019-2023) by a single experienced surgeon and his team. Conversion to larger thoracic incisions was required in 5 cases (2.59%). In-hospital and 30-day mortality was 1.02% each. The average length of ICU stay and hospital stay were 2.82 ± 1.17 days and 5.84 ± 1.71 days respectively. The duration of ICU stay correlated with the number of internal mammary artery grafts procured (p = 0.0022). Median duration of follow-up was 11 months. Overall mortality was 3.62% and cardiac related mortality was 2.07%, and 5 patients (2.59%) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Results of the sub-group analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of number of internal mammary artery grafts procured (p = 0.010), need for transfusions (p = 0.00031), ICU stay (p = 0.0005) and in-hospital stay (p = 0.0006).

Conclusions

Total Arterial Coronary Revascularization through RA-CABG is a viable procedure in select patients. An experienced surgeon and team are required. Further studies in the form of randomized trials with long term follow-up are required to establish the overall utility, effectiveness and benefits to the patients.

Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass: An Evolving Paradigm Over the Past 25 Years

OBJECTIVE

We have routinely utilized minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) for revascularization of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. We examined how this procedure has evolved.

METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of 2,283 consecutive patients who underwent MIDCAB between 1997 and 2021. Patients were divided into 3 groups: group A from 1997 to 2002 (n = 751, 32.9%), group B from 2003 to 2009 (n = 452, 19.8%), and group C from 2009 to 2021 (n = 1,080, 47.3%). Risk profiles and short-term outcomes were analyzed for the entire cohort and for 293 propensity-matched patients drawn from each group.

RESULTS

The left internal mammary artery was harvested open in group A but with robotic assistance in group C. Thirty-day mortality was higher in group A versus group C (12 deaths, 1.6% vs 5 deaths, 0.5%, P = 0.044); this difference was negated after propensity matching. Group A had more comorbidities than group C, including peripheral vascular disease (17.7% vs 10.0%, P < 0.001), congestive heart failure (39.6% vs 18.0%, P < 0.001), and a history of stroke (17.9% vs 10.0%, P < 0.001), although diabetes mellitus was more common in group C (51.4% vs 31.0%, P < 0.001). Stroke was greater in group A (1.2% vs 0.0% vs 0.2%, respectively, P = 0.004), as was the need for prolonged ventilation (3.6% vs 0.2% vs 0.9%, respectively, P < 0.001), before and after propensity matching.

CONCLUSIONS

MIDCAB patients had less comorbidities than in the past. Robot-assisted MIDCAB was associated with lower stroke risk.

Minimally-invasive cardiac surgery: a bibliometric analysis of impact and force to identify key and facilitating advanced training

Background

The number of citations an article receives is a marker of its scientific influence within a particular specialty. This bibliometric analysis intended to recognise the top 100 cited articles in minimally-invasive cardiac surgery, to determine the fundamental subject areas that have borne considerable influence upon clinical practice and academic knowledge whilst also considering bibliometric scope. This is increasingly relevant in a continually advancing specialty and one where minimally-invasive cardiac procedures have the potential for huge benefits to patient outcomes.

Methods

The Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) data citation index database was searched with the following terms: [Minimal* AND Invasive* AND Card* AND Surg*]. Results were limited to full text English language manuscripts and ranked by citation number. Further analysis of the top 100 cited articles was carried out according to subject, author, publication year, journal, institution and country of origin.

Results

A total of 4716 eligible manuscripts were retrieved. Of the top 100 papers, the median (range) citation number was 101 (51–414). The most cited paper by Lichtenstein et al. (Circulation 114(6):591–596, 2006) published in Circulation with 414 citations focused on transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation as a viable alternative to aortic valve replacement with cardiopulmonary bypass in selected patients with aortic stenosis. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery published the most papers and received the most citations (n = 35; 3036 citations). The United States of America had the most publications and citations (n = 52; 5303 citations), followed by Germany (n = 27; 2598 citations). Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, published the most papers of all institutions. Minimally-invasive cardiac surgery pertaining to valve surgery (n = 42) and coronary artery bypass surgery (n = 30) were the two most frequent topics by a large margin.

Conclusions

This work establishes a comprehensive and informative analysis of the most influential publications in minimally-invasive cardiac surgery and outlines what constitutes a citable article. Undertaking a quantitative evaluation of the top 100 papers aids in recognising the contributions of key authors and institutions as well as guiding future efforts in this field to continually improve the quality of care offered to complex cardiac patients.

Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Ultrasonically Skeletonized Internal Thoracic Artery

Objective

This study aimed to examine the feasibility and safety of minimally invasive cardiac surgery coronary artery bypass grafting using an ultrasonically skeletonized internal thoracic artery in the authors’ initial experience.

Methods

From February 2012 to May 2021, 247 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting using an ultrasonically skeletonized internal thoracic artery were reviewed retrospectively. Internal thoracic arteries were harvested in a full skeletonized fashion using an ultrasonic scalpel via left minithoracotomy. Bilateral internal thoracic arteries were used in 108 patients, and the internal thoracic arteries as in situ grafts were used in 393 anastomoses. Total arterial revascularization was performed in 126 patients, and 142 patients underwent aortic nontouch minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.

Results

The patients’ mean (range) age was 65.9 ± 11.5 (30-90) years. The mean (range) number of anastomoses performed was 2.6 ± 1.1 (1-6). Forty-six patients (18.6%) had 4 grafts, 94 patients (38.1%) had 3 grafts, and 60 patients (24.3%) had 2 grafts. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting was completed without conversion to sternotomy in all patients. Cardiopulmonary bypass was performed in 3 patients (1.2%), reinterventions due to bleeding were performed in 7 patients (2.8%), and chest wound infections were observed in 5 patients (2.0%). There was 1 (0.4%) mortality.

Conclusions

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting using an ultrasonically skeletonized internal thoracic artery is feasible and has shown good perioperative outcomes. This approach has the potential for further optimization with revascularization strategies.

Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting is Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes

Objective

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) via left minithoracotomy is an alternative to off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) via sternotomy. Our objective was to evaluate the clinical outcomes after MICS CABG versus OPCAB.

Methods

The medical records of patients who underwent MICS CABG from December 2009 to December 2011 and OPCAB from January 2005 to April 2011 were reviewed. Patients who underwent OPCAB were matched 2:1 to patients who underwent MICS CABG by age, sex, preoperative ejection fraction, creatinine concentration, as well as history of diabetes and myocardial infarction.

Results

A total of 130 MICS CABG patients were matched with 260 OPCAB patients. Mean bypasses in the MICS CABG and OPCAB groups were 2.1 and 3.2, respectively ( P = 0.001). Extubation in the operating room (OR) occurred in 70.0% and 12.7% of patients in the MICS CABG and OPCAB groups, respectively ( P = 0.001). Mean postoperative length of stay was 4 days for the MICS CABG patients versus 5 days for the OPCAB patients ( P = 0.002) and 3.8 days versus 4.6 days for the MICS CABG patients extubated in the OR compared with those who remained intubated ( P = 0.007). There were no 30-day mortalities in the MICS CABG group and 1 in the OPCAB group (P= 0.999). Thirty-day readmissions were similar, with 5.4% and 7.4% in the MICS CABG and OPCAB groups, respectively ( P = 0.527).

Conclusions

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting is safe, and early clinical outcomes are comparable, if not superior in some respects, to OPCAB. Extubation in the OR is feasible, well tolerated, and associated with earlier discharge. Shorter hospital stays may decrease resource use and promote earlier return to activities; however, further research is needed.

Defining the Learning Curve for Robotic-Assisted Endoscopic Harvesting of the Left Internal Mammary Artery

Objective

Robotic-assisted techniques are continuing to cement their role in coronary surgery, particularly in facilitating the endoscopic harvesting of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA), regardless of how the subsequent bypass grafting is performed. As more surgeons attempt to become trained in robotic-assisted procedures, we sought to better define the learning curve associated with robotic-assisted endoscopic LIMA harvest.

Methods

Between January 2011 and July 2012, a total of 77 patients underwent robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery at our institution. The LIMA was harvested endoscopically in all patients, using standard robotic instruments, followed by direct grafting to anterior wall myocardial vessels via a small thoracotomy. Intraoperative times for various components of the procedure were collated and analyzed.

Results

The mean ± SD time taken to insert and position the ports for the robotic instruments was 3.9 ± 1.4 minutes. The mean ± SD LIMA harvest time was 31.8 ± 10.1 minutes, and the mean ± SD total robotic time was 44.2 ± 12.9 minutes. All time variables consistently continued to decrease as the experience of the operating surgeon increased, with the greatest magnitude of improvement being evident within the first 20 cases. The logarithmic learning curves for LIMA harvest time and total robot time during our entire experience were both calculated as 90%, correlating to an expected 10% improvement in performance for each doubling of cases completed.

Conclusions

Coronary surgeons can rapidly become proficient in robotic-assisted endoscopic LIMA harvest, with significant improvement in operative times evident within the first 20 cases completed. These data may be useful in designing appropriate training programs for newer surgeons seeking to gain experience in robotic-assisted coronary surgery.

Does Body Mass Index Affect Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Procedures?

Objective

Obese patients pose unique technical challenges for minimal-access cardiac surgery. We sought to examine the effect of body mass index on short-term outcomes in robotic-assisted coronary surgery.

Methods

From January 2010 to November 2011, a total of 110 consecutive patients underwent robotic-assisted coronary surgery at our institution. All patients had robotic-assisted mobilization of the left internal mammary artery. Some patients then underwent direct coronary anastomosis to the left anterior descending coronary artery via a left mini thoracotomy, whereas others had a complete robotic endoscopic procedure within the closed chest. The short-term outcomes of obese patients (n = 39), defined as body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2, were compared with those of nonobese patients (n = 71).

Results

Mean left internal mammary artery harvest time was longer in obese patients than in nonobese patients (51.03 vs 39.94 minutes; P = 0.007), as was overall operative time (218.15 vs 186.72 minutes; P = 0.034). There were no significant differences in mortality or major morbidity between obese and nonobese patients.

Conclusions

Obesity does not adversely affect short-term outcomes in robotic-assisted coronary surgery, although operative times are somewhat longer for these patients. Robotic-assisted coronary techniques can be safely pursued in obese patients.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass: techniques, pitfalls, and results

In an attempt to advance the surgical treatment of coronary artery disease, surgeons sought a way to offer the proven benefits of coronary revascularization and avoid the side effects of cardiopulmonary bypass by performing revascularization in the beating heart (off-pump coronary artery bypass). This review will describe the development and refinement of the technique, pitfalls to its widespread adoption, and an up-to-date assessment of current results.

A comparation of coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in EuroSCORE high risk patients

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and nitric oxide (NO) have been suggested to be in - The objective of this study is to compare outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in high-risk patients performed with- (ONCAB) and without -(OPCAB) use of cardiopulmonary bypass. From October 2001 till October 2005, 210 high-risk patients classified according to European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) (score =or> 5) underwent CABG in Cardiovascular Clinic, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. 138 patients operated as OPCAB were compared to 72 patients operated as ONCAB. All data were entered in a patient database (DATACOR) and analyzed in SPSS. OPCAB patients received insignificantly less number of grafts than those treated by ONCAB (3,0 vs. 3,2) (p=0,071). Stroke was significantly more common in ONCAB group (2,9 vs. 11,1%) (p=0,034) while the incidence of other postoperative complications and mortality were similar. The ventilation time (4,3 vs. 6,7 hours) (p=0,007), retransfusion volume (392,7 vs. 633,7 ml) (p=0,041) and hospital stay (8,2 vs. 10,1 days) (p=0,031) was significantly less in OPCAB group. OPCAB is safe and effective in treatment of high-risk patients. Avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with reduced incidence of neurologic complications, lower intubation time, retransfusion rate and shorter hospital stay, and in our experience the preferred operative method in such patients.

Cardiac Angio-CT Scan for Planning MIDCAB

Precise evaluation of the cardiac and thoracic anatomy of the patient is mandatory for planning safe minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB). Three-dimensional images obtained with a computed tomographic coronary angiography (angio-CT) scan make it possible to accurately visualize the intrathoracic surgical anatomy in order to check the feasibility of the direct exposure of the anatomical structures involved in the surgical procedure. Particular morphological parameters of coronary arteries such as diameter, wall calcification, and intramyocardial position as well as bypass grafts and internal thoracic artery (ITA) displacement can all be precisely defined with this method. We present our preliminary experience using cardiac angio-CT scan as a method for selecting patients for MIDCAB in order to avoid possible surgical complications to minimize the necessity for conversion to the standard surgical approach as well as for choosing the best surgical access.

A comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery with sternotomy

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to compare in-hospital mortality and complications and three-year mortality and revascularization for off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery after adjusting for patient risk.

BACKGROUND

The use of off-pump CABG surgery has increased tremendously in recent years, but little is known about its long-term outcomes relative to on-pump CABG surgery, and most studies have been very small.

METHODS

Short- and long-term outcomes (inpatient mortality and complications, three-year risk-adjusted mortality, and mortality/revascularization) were explored for patients who underwent off-pump CABG surgery (9135 patients) and on-pump CABG surgery (59044 patients) with median sternotomy from 1997 to 2000 in the state of New York.

RESULTS

Risk-adjusted inpatient mortality was 2.02% for off-pump versus 2.16% for on-pump (p = 0.390). Off-pump patients had lower rates of perioperative stroke (1.6% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.003) and bleeding requiring reoperation (1.6% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001) and higher rates of gastrointestinal bleeding, perforation, or infarction (1.2% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.003). Off-pump patients had lower postoperative lengths of stay (median 5 days vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). On-pump patients had higher three-year survival (adjusted risk ratio [RR] =1.086, p = 0.045) and higher freedom from death or revascularization (adjusted RR = 1.232, p < 0.001). When analyses were limited to 1999 to 2000, the two-year adjusted hazard ratio for survival was not significant (adjusted RR = 0.99, p = 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

On-pump patients experience better long-term survival and freedom from revascularization than off-pump patients. However, the survival benefit from on-pump procedures was no longer present in the last two years of the study.

Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation vs. minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) in patients with left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery in the management of patients with proximal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery stenosis. Until recent years, despite the advantages of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with bare metal stent implantation, such as shorter hospital stays and recovery time, MIDCAB showed better results with regard to the need for repeated intervention in the target vessel than PTCA with proximal LAD lesions. Symptomatic patients (n = 189) were randomly assigned to DES group (n = 119) and MIDCAB group (n = 70). Patients with an isolated high-grade lesion (stenosis of > or = 70% of the luminal diameter) in the proximal LAD coronary artery (from the ostium to the first diagonal branch) were included in this study. During the 6-month follow-up period, 1.7% (n = 2) in the DES group needed repeated revascularization procedures for target lesion revascularization compared with 5.9% (n = 4) in the MIDCAB group (P = 0.196). The rates of death and myocardial infarction were similar in both groups [DES 0.0% (n = 0) vs. MIDCAB 2.9% (n = 2), P = 0.135; DES 1.7% (n = 2) vs. MIDCAB 2.9% (n = 2), P = 0.627; respectively] during 6 months of follow-up. In-hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the DES group compared with the MIDCAB group (5.8 +/- 2.1 days vs. 8.9 +/- 2.6 days; P = 0.001). DES implantation and MIDCAB surgery showed similar rates of myocardial infarction, the need for repeated revascularization, and death during 6 months of follow-up. However, DES implantation resulted in lower average number of hospital stays and similar postoperative complications.

Use of off-pump and on-pump CABG strategies in current clinical practice: the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program of the state of Washington

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to assess clinical outcomes and regional differences in the use of on-pump and off-pump CABG in current clinical practice.

METHODS

Between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2000, there were 10,429 CABG procedures performed in 16 Washington state hospitals, all of which participate in Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program database. This analysis excluded patients with a history of prior CABG as well as those who underwent emergent surgery. After applying these exclusion criteria, 8402 patients (7169 on-pump and 1233 off-pump CABG procedures) were evaluated and presented as both unadjusted and risk-adjusted outcomes.

OUTCOMES

Off-pump CABG constituted 14.7% of all surgical revascularization procedures. These varied enormously among individual centers from an incidence of 0% to 68.9%. The use of off-pump CABG was not associated with a decreased risk of risk-adjusted hospital mortality or stroke, but was associated with a reduction in hospital stay > 7 days (OR 0.62, CI 0.51-0.76), ventilator > 24 hours (OR 0.52, CI 0.34-0.81), dialysis (OR 0.34, CI 0.14-0.86), and RBC transfusion (OR 0.5, CI 0.40-0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite its highly variable use, off-pump CABG seems to be judiciously used in current clinical practice in the State of Washington and is associated with a decrease in morbidity in appropriately selected patients.

Off-pump multivessel revascularization: efficacy of suction type of coronary stabilizer

OBJECTIVE

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has come into widespread use with the availability adequate coronary stabilization devices. We studied the efficacy of second-generation coronary stabilization devices (suction device) comparing to the first-generation device (compression device).

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent isolated off-pump CABG via a midline sternotomy at Shin-Tokyo Hospital Group between July 1, 1996, and August 31, 2000, comparing perioperative, and follow-up data in the group using a suction device (group S) to that in the group using a compression device (group C).

RESULTS

Preoperative risk factors were identical between the two groups, with the exception of a higher incidence of three vessel disease in group S. Complete revascularization increased from 47.3% in group C to 88.1% in group S, and the number of distal anastomoses from 2.1 +/- 0.6 in group C to 2.9 +/- 0.9 in group S. Revascularization of the circumflex artery was achieved in 21.7% of group S patients, which was significantly higher than that in group C (2.2%). Postoperative recovery, mortality, and morbidity did not differ significantly between groups. Calculated event-free rates at 2 years was 88.7% in group C and 92.0% in group S (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Anastomosis to the posterior wall of the heart using the suction device is safe. An increased number of distal anastomoses may reduce the occurrence of cardiac events related to incomplete revascularization.

Clinical and quantitative angiographic outcomes following elective implantation of the self-expanding Wallstent for longer coronary artery lesions--final results of the Wellstent native study

BACKGROUND: Implantation of short balloon-expandable stents provides superior clinical and angiographic outcome compared with balloon angioplasty in selected patients. The purpose of the Wellstent study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the self-expanding Wallstent combined with aspirin and ticlopidine in patients with stable or unstable angina related to a native coronary lesion up to 45 mm in length. METHODS: 105 patients (111 lesions) with stable (57%) or unstable (43%) angina were included in this prospective multicentre evaluation. Angiography before and after Wallstent implantation and at 6-month follow-up was analysed at the core lab using the CAAS 2 system. The primary end-point was incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days. Secondary end-points were angiographic outcome at 6 months and MACE at 6 months and 1 year. RESULTS: Acute procedural success (successful stent implantation with residual stenosis <20%) was achieved in 99%. Mean reference diameter was 3.18 +/- 0.66 mm, minimal luminal diameter was 1.00 +/- 0.50 mm pre- and 2.84 +/- 0.47 mm poststent (diameter stenosis 16 +/- 6%). The mean hospital stay was 2.2 days. At 30 days, 95% of patients were free of MACE. At 6 month and 1 year clinical follow-up, 75% and 71% of patients, respectively, remained free of MACE, the majority of which (19 of 30) were re-interventions at re-angiography. In 90% of eligible patients, MLD at follow-up was 1.65 +/- 0.75 mm (late loss 1.20 +/- 0.66 mm, loss index 0.66), diameter stenosis 42 +/- 15%, with a restenosis rate of 32%. Longer stents were associated with greater luminal loss (P = 0.001) and less-favourable clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Wallstent implantation, combined with aspirin and ticlopidine, achieved excellent acute and 30 day clinical results in a heterogenous high-risk patient group. Clinical outcome at 6 months and 1 year remained good, and most adverse events were re-PTCA during follow-up angiography. The loss index of 0.66 and restenosis rate of 32%, related in part to the use of longer stents, emphasizes the continuing need for effective anti-proliferative therapy.

Preliminary experience with a novel intraoperative fluorescence imaging technique to evaluate the patency of bypass grafts in total arterial revascularization

BACKGROUND

Early graft failure is a common cause of cardiac morbidity and mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and there is particular concern about graft patency in off-pump CABG. We describe our preliminary experience with a novel imaging technique (the SPY system), based on fluorescence of Indocyanine Green when exposed to near infrared light, for the intraoperative assessment of coronary graft patency.

METHODS

Graft patency was assessed in patients undergoing off-pump and on-pump total arterial revascularization. The imaging technique requires injection of a 1-mL bolus of Indocyanine Green into the central venous line, followed by imaging with the SPY system.

RESULTS

We assessed intraoperative graft patency in 213 conduits in 84 patients (mean, 2.54 grafts per patient), of which, 65 (77%) were done off-pump. It took approximately 3 minutes to image each graft. Skeletonized conduits provided better visualization than pedicled ones. Fluorescence, confirming graft patency, was observed in all but four (1.9%) conduits in 4 (5%) patients. In these latter cases, graft revision was necessitated.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluorescence imaging of coronary grafts using the SPY is a uniquely simple, safe, noninvasive, and reproducible technique for intraoperative confirmation of graft patency. In 4 patients, it necessitated revision of the initial intraoperative procedure. Quantification of graft flow would enhance the value of the system.

Bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery graftings in off-pump coronary artery bypass: early result of Y versus in situ grafts

BACKGROUND

Use of bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) in off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) retains several advantages that may eventually result in better patient outcomes. We compared the early results of OPCAB using bilateral ITAs as Y grafts with results of OPCAB using bilateral ITAs as in situ grafts.

METHODS

A total of 223 consecutive patients who underwent OPCAB using bilateral skeletonized ITAs as Y grafts (group I, n = 113) or in situ grafts (group II, n = 110) were studied.

RESULTS

Both the number of distal anastomoses per patient and the number of distal anastomoses per bilateral ITA were higher in group I (3.5 +/- 1.0 and 2.9 +/- 0.7) than in group II (3.0 +/- 0.7 and 2.4 +/- 0.5) (p < 0.01). Hospital mortality was 1.8% (2/113) in group I and 0.9% (1/110) in group II (p = ns). There were no differences in postoperative complications including atrial fibrillation (13.3% vs 10.9%), perioperative myocardial infarction (0.9% vs 2.7%), mediastinitis (0.9% vs 1.8%), and hypoperfusion syndrome (0.9% vs 0%) between groups I and II (p = ns). Postoperative coronary angiographies performed in 110 patients in group I and 108 patients in group II showed 99.0% (382/386) overall patency and 99.4% (319/321) patency for distal anastomoses using ITAs in group I, and 98.1% (312/318) overall patency and 98.1% (258/263) patency for distal anastomoses using ITA in group II. There were no significant differences in graft patency rates between the two groups (p = ns).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that OPCAB using bilateral skeletonized ITAs is technically feasible, with excellent graft patency. Using bilateral skeletonized ITAs as Y grafts increases the number of distal anastomoses that can be performed and does not cause additional postoperative morbidity.

Off-pump coronary artery surgery

Cardiopulmonary bypass has several associated deleterious effects that include a systemic inflammatory response, coagulopathy, central nervous system complications and a variable degree of end-organ damage. The recent upsurge in interest in "beating-heart" surgery attempts to avoid these deleterious effects. Advances in surgical technique, such as the use of intracoronary shunts and the Octopus retractor, have made beating-heart surgery a reality. The challenges for the anaesthetist are greater than for coronary artery surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass, and whilst some advantages are proven, such as the lack of the inflammatory response and the decreased need for blood or blood products, others have yet to be proved and there is a need for further research. The advantages and disadvantages need to be evaluated in randomised studies in order to confirm the safety and efficacy of these new techniques in terms of long-term graft patency and decreased morbidity.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with three-vessel disease

BACKGROUND

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been performed since 1996 in our institute, and its application has recently been expanded to patients with three-vessel disease. A study was performed to clarify the benefit of off-pump CABG for patients with three-vessel disease.

METHODS

Between June 1, 1991 and September 30, 2001, a total of 1089 patients with three-vessel disease (832 men and 257 women; mean age, 64.0 +/- 9.1 years) underwent on-pump CABG. After 1997, a total of 310 patients with three-vessel disease (223 men and 87 women; mean age, 68.8 +/- 8.6 years) underwent off-pump CABG. Data of the historical cohort of on-pump CABG and the concurrent cohort of off-pump CABG were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The 2 groups were age and gender matched. Significant comorbidities were more often observed in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group. The mean number of bypass grafts in the off-pump versus on-pump CABG was 3.3 vs 3.7, P <.0001. The mean intubation period, intensive care unit stay, and postoperative hospital stay were 7.9 vs 11.7 hours, 2.2 vs 3.0 days, and 14.5 vs 17.5 days, respectively (P <.0001). In-hospital mortality rate (0.6% vs 1.2%, respectively) and morbidity rates (10.3% vs 12.9%, respectively) were not significantly different. After surgery, calculated event-free rates at 2 years were 93.3% vs 91.9%, respectively; P = not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with multivessel disease, off-pump CABG provided early recovery, and its complication rates and early follow-up results were equivalent to on-pump CABG.

On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass using quadruple arterial grafts

The optimal combination of arterial grafts for quadruple coronary artery bypass is the bilateral internal mammary artery, the radial artery, and the gastroepiploic artery. Patients who underwent quadruple bypass in our hospital group between December 1995 and March 2001 were retrospectively analyzed to determine whether off-pump surgery (n = 27) provides better outcomes than conventional on-pump surgery (n = 51). Preoperative risk factors as well as the mean number of distal anastomoses (4.5 in the off-pump versus 4.8 in the on-pump patients) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Postoperative recovery was significantly faster in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group (intubation time, 6.4 versus 16 hours; stay in intensive care unit, 2 versus 3 days; and postoperative hospital stay, 12.3 versus 15.8 days). Early stenosis-free graft patency rates did not differ significantly (90.3% versus 89.3%). No late cardiac events were observed in the off-pump group, while 4 occurred in the on-pump group. Quadruple arterial bypass without cardiopulmonary bypass is safe, and it allows faster recovery. The follow-up results of off-pump patients so far have been satisfactory.

Limited-access surgical coronary artery revascularization

The continued evolution of surgical revascularization has resulted in much less invasive alternatives for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. In particular, techniques and technologies have been developed to allow for the grafting of coronary arteries through limited access incisions without the circulatory support of cardiopulmonary bypass. The conduits are generally arterial rather than the venous alternatives used originally, and the harvesting of these conduits is performed through limited access incisions described in another article in this review. The result of these efforts is sternal-sparing solutions for the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting of all the various coronary locations on the heart. This is accomplished through a spectrum of small incisions that can directly expose any specific area of interest for focal bypass grafting. The surgical insult is greatly reduced and the patient's recovery is significantly enhanced. These efforts continue to bring us closer to the ultimate goal of 24-hour hospital stays for coronary artery bypass grafting patients.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for elderly patients

BACKGROUND

The use of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has recently become widespread, and it has been proven to be less invasive and to facilitate early recovery. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of off-pump CABG for patients aged 75 years or more.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was carried out for patients who underwent isolated off-pump and on-pump CABG at Shin-Tokyo Hospital between January 1997 and December 2000. The patients' demographic, operative data, and postoperative results were collected.

RESULTS

The off-pump group consisted of 60 men and 44 women with a mean age of 78.8 years, and the on-pump group consisted of 54 men and 20 women with a mean age of 77.6 years. Distal anastomoses were significantly fewer in the off-pump group (2.4 in off-pump group versus 3.7 in on-pump group), but total arterial bypass was more frequently achieved in off-pump group (82.7% versus 25.7%). Intubation time (8.4 versus 18.4 hours), intensive care unit stay (2.2 versus 3.5 days), and postoperative stay (13.8 versus 20.0 days) were significantly shorter in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group (p < 0.05). The frequency of the occurrence of major complications was significantly lower in the off-pump group than the on-pump group, especially in regard to postoperative stroke and respiratory failure (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that off-pump CABG significantly reduced patient recovery period and the incidence of postoperative complications. Early follow-up results, cardiac event-free and survival rates, did not significantly differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-pump CABG is safe for the elderly patient. Off-pump CABG successfully facilitates early recovery and reduces the incidence of postoperative complications among elderly patients.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass may decrease the patency of saphenous vein grafts

BACKGROUND

There is concern that a hypercoagulable status is caused after coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, or OPCAB) and may potentially endanger the patency of the anastomosis. The aims of this study were: (1) to compare 1-year graft patency after OPCAB with that of conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and that of on-pump beating CABG; and (2) to demonstrate any differences in patency of various conduits among the three groups.

METHODS

We analyzed the results of 122 consecutive OPCAB cases (group 1) compared with those of 65 consecutive conventional CABG cases (group II) and those of 19 consecutive on-pump beating CABG cases (group III). In group I, coronary angiography (CAG) was performed immediately postoperatively and 1 year after surgery. In groups II and III, CAG was performed 1 year after surgery. Graft patency was graded as grade A (excellent), grade B (fair), or grade O (occluded).

RESULTS

The average number of distal anastomoses in groups I, II, and III were 3.1 +/- 1.1, 3.7 +/- 0.9, and 3.6 +/- 0.9, respectively. In group I, postoperative CAG was performed in 92% of patients (112/122) before discharge. The patency rate (grade A + B) was 96.4% (162/168) for arterial grafts, and 85.6% (160/187) for saphenous vein grafts (SVG). One-year follow-up CAG was performed in 74% of patients (90/122). The patency rate was 97.8% (132/135) for arterial grafts and 67.9% (106/156) for SVG. In group II, 1-year follow-up CAG was performed in 65% of patients (42/65). The patency rate (grade A + B) was 93.5% (43/46) for arterial grafts and 88.3% (98/111) for SVG. In group III, 1-year follow-up CAG was performed in 89% of patients (17/19). The patency rate (grade A + B) was 100% (19/19) for arterial grafts and 86.8% (33/38) for SVG.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that the patency rate ot SVG after OPCAB was significantly lower than that of arterial grafts in the early postoperative CAG (p < 0.001), and was also significantly lower than those of SVG of group II (p < 0.001) and group III (p < 0.01) in the postoperative 1-year CAG, although there was no significant difference in 1-year patency of arterial grafts among the three groups. Our data suggest that a specific perioperative anticoagulant therapy may be advisable in patients undergoing OPCAB with SVG.

Coronary revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass in high-risk patients: a route to the future

Previous reports have demonstrated that reoperative coronary revascularization, advanced age, female sex, and impaired left ventricular dysfunction are independent predictors of operative mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). CABG without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG) has been proposed as a potential therapeutic alternative in these high-risk patient groups. Despite the substantial learning curve associated with off-pump CABG, early outcomes of off-pump CABG in high-risk patients are better than those associated with the conventional on-pump CABG approach. These results suggest that off-pump CABG is a safe alternative to on-pump CABG in high-risk patients. Randomized prospective studies are needed to validate the results of these initial retrospective reports and to demonstrate the long-term benefits of this approach.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass. Mid-term results

OBJECTIVES

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on the beating heart has become popular procedure in cardiac surgery and its initial results appeared favorable. We report our early and mid-term results of off-pump CABG performed at Shin-Tokyo Hospital.

METHODS

Medical records of patients undergoing off-pump or conventional on-pump CABG from September 1, 1996, to August 31, 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent off-pump CABG were further classified into 2 groups; MIDCAB (Off-pump CABG for single vessel revascularization via a small skin incision) and OPCAB (off-pump CABG mainly approached via midline sternotomy) group. Their preoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Among a total of 995 cases of CABG, 194 cases were off-pump CABG (male/female 142/52, mean age 66.9). The mean number of distal anastomoses in off-pump CABG was 1.9 +/- 0.9 (1.0 +/- 0.0 in MIDCAB and 2.3 +/- 0.7 in OPCAB), which was significantly fewer than in on-pump CABG (3.6 +/- 1.1), with p < 0.0001. Intubation time (5.3 +/- 5.7 hours in off-pump CABG vs 13.1 +/- 24.2 hours in on-pump CABG), ICU stay (1.7 +/- 1.1 vs 3.2 +/- 3.0 days), and postoperative hospital stay (14.0 +/- 7.9 vs 18.1 +/- 12.1 days) in off-pump CABG were significantly shorter than in on-pump CABG (p < 0.0001). In the off-pump CABG group, there were no in-hospital deaths and 14 major complications, fewer than in on-pump CABG (8 hospital deaths and 114 major complications). Postoperative angiography before hospital discharge was conducted in 80 patients (41.2%) and showed 2 occlusions, giving a graft patency rate of 98.6% in the off-pump group. During follow-up (0.9 +/- 0.6 year) period, there were 5 non-cardiac deaths and 20 cardiac events in the off-pump group. The actuarial survival rate at 36 months was 94.6% for off-pump CABG, showing no significant difference from the rate for conventional CABG patients (95.2% at 36 month, p = NS) The event-free rate was 84.0% at 36 months in off-pump CABG patients; however, which was less favorable than on-pump CABG patients (88.0% at 36 months, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both in-hospital and mid-term results for off-pump CABG patients were acceptable. Isolated CABG can thus be safely performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. Advances in coronary stabilization have contributed to these improved results. The observed long-term cardiac events may be related to incomplete revascularization.

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting for the left anterior descending coronary artery

OBJECTIVE

A single surgeon conducted One hundred and twelve patients underwent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting for the left anterior descending coronary artery 112 patients at Yamato Seiwa Hospital from September 1996 until August 1999.

METHODS

All procedures were performed via left anterior short thoracotomy using a stabilizer during graft anastomosis.

RESULTS

No operative deaths occurred but 3 patients died while hospitalized due to noncardiac events. Graft occlusion was seen in 3 patients early postoperatively. Other angiography graft failure such as stenosis was seen in 11 patients. Occlusive lesions of other coronary arteries occurred in 77 patients (69%) and 53 patients underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty the pre/postoperatively for those lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting is seen by cardiologists as a reasonable form of revascularization in conditioned patients having left anterior descending artery lesion, and that minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting has a spectrum of candidates different from that of conventional surgical revascularization for the coronary artery.

Minimally invasive coronary artery revascularization: off-pump bypass grafting and the hybrid procedure

was safe, effective, and suitable especially in patients with high risks for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Atrial fibrillation after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVES

The study compared the adjusted risk for developing atrial fibrillation (AF) after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery (MIDCAB) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation results in increased morbidity and delays hospital discharge after CABG. Recently, MIDCAB has been explored as an alternative to CABG. Because of differences in surgical approach between the two procedures, the incidence of AF may differ.

METHODS

Randomly selected patients undergoing CABG and MIDCAB were examined. Baseline variables and postoperative course were recorded through review of medical record data.

RESULTS

The MIDCAB patients were younger than CABG patients (64+/-12 vs. 67+/-10, p<0.04) and had less extensive coronary artery disease (53% of MIDCAB vs. 3% of CABG had single-vessel disease, while 15% of MIDCAB vs. 69% of CABG had triple-vessel disease, p<0.001 for overall group comparisons). No other differences in clinical or treatment data were noted. Postoperative AF occurred less often after MIDCAB (23% vs. 39%, p = 0.02). Other significant factors associated with postoperative AF included age (p = 0.0024), prior AF (p = 0.0007), left main disease (p = 0.01), number of vessels bypassed (p = 0.009), absence of postoperative beta-blocker therapy (p = 0.0001), and a serious postoperative complication (p = 0.0018). Because of differences between CABG and MIDCAB patients, multivariate logistic analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of postoperative AF. The type of surgery (CABG vs. MIDCAB) was no longer a significant predictor of postoperative AF (estimated relative risk for AF in CABG vs. MIDCAB patients: 1.57, 95% confidence interval (0.82-2.52).

CONCLUSIONS

Although AF appears to be less common after MIDCAB than after CABG, the lower incidence is due to different clinical characteristics of patients undergoing these procedures.

Coronary artery bypass grafting using a miniature right ventricular support system

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with cardioplegic myocardial preservation has long been the gold standard for surgical care of coronary artery disease. More recently, alternatives to the conventional approach of CPB-myocardial revascularization have been developed. Epicardial stabilizing devices have been used to immobilize areas of the beating heart to provide a stable surface for some coronary anastomoses. These approaches are often limited to anterior aspects of the heart because revascularization of posterior and lateral vessels often requires the heart to be manipulated or contorted. Excessive manipulation can lead to hemodynamic compromise as a result of partially obstructing pulmonary blood flow. A miniature extracorporeal system has been developed that uses right ventricular support and allows for epicardial surgical procedures to be conducted on a beating heart without standard CPB. The extracorporeal system consists of a coaxial atrial cannula that is connected to a miniature centrifugal pump. Blood is drained from the right atrium, passes through the miniature centrifugal pump and is delivered through the cannula's inner reinfusion lumen into the pulmonary artery. The entire circuit volume is approximately 30 ml. The system is positioned on the sterile operative field. The pump is controlled by a console positioned adjacent to the patient. The centrifugal pump is capable of delivering blood flow at rates of 1-6 l/min. This extracorporeal system may be of benefit in maintaining adequate cardiac output during epicardial beating heart surgery.

Comparison of standard coronary artery bypass grafting and minimary invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Early and mid-term result

OBJECTIVES

We studied indications and problems involved in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB).

METHODS

We compared patients profiles, graft patency, stenosis severity, morbidity, mortality, long-term survival and freedom from cardiac accidents in 174 patients undergoing elective standard coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and 128 undergoing between January 1996 and March 1999.

RESULTS

No statistically difference was seen in gender, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, cerebrovascular accident, multi-vessel disease ratios, or left main trunk stenosis between 2 groups. Internal thoracic artery graft patency was 97% (114/118) and the rate of anastomotic stenosis (> 50%) was 9% (10/118) compared to 96% (213/221) in the MIDCAB group. The 3-year survival rate was 91% in the MIDCAB group and 92% in the CABG group and freedom from cardiac accidents, most involving pericutaneus transluminal coronary angioplasty retreatment, was 66% in the MIDCAB group and 88% in the CABG group.

CONCLUSION

Although patency and stenosis incidence did not differ between 2 groups, freedom from cardiac accidents was lower in the MIDCAB group.

Is median sternotomy invasive? A comparison between minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass and off-pump bypass

Although minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) eliminates the need for median sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass, its indications are limited. Conversely, coronary artery bypass without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump bypass) enables complete surgical revascularization under an optimal surgical field established by median sternotomy, even if patients have multivessel disease. The present study was designed to determine the invasiveness of median sternotomy by comparing 11 patients who underwent MIDCAB and 5 who underwent off-pump bypass between May 1997 and April 1998. There were no significant differences between the MIDCAB group and the off-pump group in age, being 57 +/- 11 vs 66 +/- 8 years old, the operative time, being 321 +/- 149 vs 441 +/- 205 min, the number of grafts, being 1.0 vs 1.4/patient, peak creatine kinase (CK) values, being 662 +/- 436 vs 609 +/- 56 IU/l, the peak CK-muscle-brain values, being 12 +/- 9 vs 16 +/- 5 IU/l, and the postoperative blood loss, being 369 +/- 198 vs 541 +/- 204 ml. Although there was no significant difference in peak C-reactive protein, at 17 +/- 5 vs 20 +/- 2 mg/dl, the periods declining within the normal ranges were shorter in the MIDCAB group than in the off-pump group, at 7 +/- 1 vs 15 +/- 2 days (P > 0.01). The hospital stay was almost the same in both groups, at 16 +/- 8 vs 26 +/- 14 days. These findings suggest that off-pump bypass is more invasive than MIDCAB, which may be attributed to the median sternotomy.

Survey of resident training in beating heart operations

BACKGROUND

"Off-pump" coronary artery operations are done with increasing frequency in the treatment of coronary artery disease. As a result, residents in thoracic surgery have been confronted with the necessity of gaining experience in this innovative approach to coronary surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the importance of training in minimally invasive coronary revascularization as it was perceived by thoracic surgery residents.

METHODS

A postal, multiple-choice survey questionnaire was sent to all cardiothoracic surgery residents (n = 327) of accredited training programs in the United States. Responses were tabulated and analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 68% (222 of 327 residents). The attending staff was very interested (37%), or had some interest (63%), in beating heart coronary revascularization. Ninety-eight percent of the programs had at least one surgeon performing off-pump procedures. Although 88% of the responding residents showed some interest in off-pump coronary operations, only 22% of them had performed more than 20 off-pump cases, and even less (12%) had performed more than 20 cases of off-pump complete revascularization, or off-pump circumflex revascularization (4%). Sixteen percent of them had no clinical experience with these techniques. Regarding career intentions, 88% of the residents indicated that off-pump coronary operations were expected to be part of the practice, and 58% of them were interested in pursuing additional training in less invasive heart procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this survey suggest that training in off-pump coronary revascularization is variable across training programs, and that the majority of residents may not reach proficiency in coronary procedures on the beating heart during their residency. This may adversely affect their future expectations, as 88% of them would like to practice off-pump coronary surgery once the training is completed.

A xiphoid approach for minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

The premise for adopting minimally invasive cardiac surgery techniques for myocardial revascularization is to reduce the patient's morbidity without compromising the efficacy of conventional coronary artery bypass. However, opening the pleura has been a limitation of using these approaches.

AIM

We used the xiphoid approach as an alternative to opening the pleura and to minimize pain after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery.

METHODS

We review our surgical experience in 55 patients who underwent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery through a xiphoid approach between October 1997 and August 1999. Thoracoscopy (n = 31) or direct vision (n = 24) were used for internal mammary artery (IMA) harvesting. Mean patient age was 67 +/- 10 years and 65% were men. The mean Parsonnet score was 23 +/- 10. Performed anastomoses included left IMA (LIMA) to the left anterior descending (LAD) artery (n = 53), LIMA-to-LAD and saphenous vein graft from the LIMA to the right coronary artery (n = 1), and LIMA-to-LAD and right IMA (RIMA) to right coronary artery (n = 1).

RESULTS

Postoperative complications included atrial fibrillation (12%), acute noninfectious pericarditis (12%), and acute renal failure (5%). Mean postoperative length of stay was 4 +/- 2 days. Angiography was performed in 16 patients and demonstrated excellent patency of the anastomoses. There was no operative mortality. Actuarial survival was 98% in a mean follow-up period of 11 +/- 5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass can be performed safely through a xiphoid approach with low morbidity, mortality, and a relatively short hospital stay.

Anesthesia and Regional Anesthetic Techniques for Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

An innovative new approach to coronary revasculariza tion, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass is performed via a small anterior minithoracotomy or ministernotomy on a beating heart without the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass. Components of this tech nique, including thoracoscopic video-assisted harvest ing of the internal mammary artery, often with har monic scalpel and potentially even robotic assistance, necessitate prolonged one-lung ventilation. In the ab sence of cardioplegia, myocardial protection during normothermic beating heart surgery poses a challenge. Patient selection is important to avoid intraoperative and postoperative complications. Prolonged single- lung ventilation, incomplete revascularization in hybrid procedures, and limited access for rapid intervention pose challenges with patient management. Conversion to sternotomy may be required in 5% to 7% of patients, and extension of portals over several dermatomal seg ments mandate a versatile analgesic technique. Re gional anesthesia as analgesic adjuvant allows lighter levels of general anesthesia during surgery with mini mal intraoperative hemodynamic changes and a smooth transition to postoperative analgesia. Although a num ber of regional techniques may be used to achieve this goal, thoracic epidural analgesia or continuous percuta neous paravertebral block seem to offer specific advan tages of cardiac sympathectomy.