Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A study of 10,000 cases

ERCP-related adverse events: incidence, mechanisms, risk factors, prevention, and management

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a commonly performed procedure for pancreaticobiliary disease. While ERCP is highly effective, it is also associated with the highest adverse event (AE) rates of all commonly performed endoscopic procedures. Thus, it is critical that endoscopists and caregivers of patients undergoing ERCP have clear understandings of ERCP-related AEs.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the available evidence on ERCP-related AEs. For the purposes of this review, we subdivide the presentation of each ERCP-related AE according to the following clinically relevant domains: definitions and incidence, proposed mechanisms, risk factors, prevention, and recognition and management. The evidence informing this review was derived in part from a search of the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, performed on 1 May 20231 May 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

Knowledge of ERCP-related AEs is critical not only given potential improvements in peri-procedural quality and related care that can ensue but also given the importance of reviewing these considerations with patients during informed consent. The ERCP community and researchers should aim to apply standardized definitions of AEs. Evidence-based knowledge of ERCP risk factors should inform patient care decisions during training and beyond.

Transmission of oral microbiota to the biliary tract during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) possesses a translocation risk of microbes to the biliary system. We studied bile contamination during ERC and its impact on patients' outcome in a real-life-situation.

METHODS

Ninety-nine ERCs were analyzed and microbial samples were taken from the throat before and from bile during ERC and from irrigation fluid of the duodenoscope before and after ERC.

RESULTS

91.2% of cholangitis patients had detectable microbes in the bile (sensitivity 91%), but the same was true for 86.2% in the non-cholangitis group. Bacteroides fragilis (p=0.015) was significantly associated with cholangitis. In 41.7% of ERCs with contaminated endoscopes these microbes were found in the bile after the procedure. Analysis of duodenoscopes' irrigation liquid after ERC matched the microbial bile analysis of these patients in 78.8%. Identical microbial species were in throat and in bile samples of the same ERC in 33% of all cases and in 45% in the non-cholangitis group. Transmission of microbes to the biliary tract did not result in more frequent cholangitis, longer hospital stays, or worse outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

During ERC bile samples are regularly contaminated with microbes of the oral cavity but it did not affect clinical outcome.

Retrospective Analysis of Characteristics, Indications and Outcomes of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in a Tertiary Referral Center in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an advanced endoscopic procedure that is an essential tool in the management of pancreaticobiliary diseases. There is limited data available on the indications and outcomes of ERCP from this region. Therefore, we aim to report the characteristics of patients, indications and outcomes of ERCP in Saudi Arabia.  Methods: We retrospectively looked at ERCP procedures done at a tertiary referral center covering the western region of Saudi Arabia from August 2018 until July 2020. Data were collected from the hospital's electronic patient record and endoscopy database.

RESULTS

 Of 1001 ERCPs performed, full data was available on 712 procedures on 581 patients that were included in the final analysis. Mean age was 53.1 years. Four hundred four (56.7%) were female. Board-certified consultants performed all ERCPs. The most common intervention was sphincterotomy, which was performed in 563 (96.9%) patients who underwent first-ever ERCP, followed by dilatation and stenting. The commonest indication of ERCP was confirmed or suspected choledocholithiasis (52.6%), followed by replacement or removal of a biliary stent (15.7%), 55 (7.7%) for suspected ascending cholangitis, 54 (7.5%) for acute biliary pancreatitis and 15 (2%) for suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. The commonest finding among all patients was choledocholithiasis in 57.9%, debris in 15.2% and biliary stricture in 14.8%. The commonest complication was pancreatitis in 22 (3.1%) followed by post-sphincterotomy bleeding in 16 (2.2%) and perforation in nine (1.2%). Bleeding was controlled by endoscopic intervention in four (25%) and one (6.2%) patient underwent surgery. One (0.14%) patient had procedure-related mortality secondary to post-procedure pulmonary embolism and one had significant morbidity and prolonged hospitalization because of complicated perforation. The deeper common bile duct (CBD) cannulation rate was 97.3%.

CONCLUSION

Our study results revealed that ERCP performed in the western region of Saudi Arabia has similar indications and findings as reported in the international literature. ERCP is successful in achieving the therapeutic objectives with complication rates consistent with published data.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Comparison With Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Detection of the Etiology of Obstructive Jaundice

BACKGROUND

Despite technological advances, obstructive jaundice has significant morbidity and mortality rates. When studying obstructive jaundice, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), the "gold standard" for biliary obstruction identification, might be replaced with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), which is a non-invasive procedure.

OBJECTIVE

Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP in comparison with ERCP for the detection of the etiology of obstructive jaundice.

METHODOLOGY

This prospective, observational study included 102 patients who presented with obstructive jaundice as proven by liver function tests. The MRCP was conducted within 24 to 72 hours before the ERCP. A torso phased-array coil (Siemens, Germany) was used for the MRCP. The duodeno-videoscope and general electric fluoroscopy were used to perform the ERCP. The MRCP was evaluated by a classified radiologist who was blinded to the clinical details. An experienced consultant gastroenterologist who was blinded to the results of the MRCP assessed the cholangiogram of each patient. The hepato-pancreaticobiliary system results from both procedures were compared based on the pathology observed, such as choledocholithiasis, pancreaticobiliary strictures, and dilatation of biliary strictures. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values with 95% confidence intervals. The statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

The most commonly reported pathology was choledocholithiasis, and MRCP diagnosed 55 patients, of which 53 were true positive cases when compared with the ERCP results of the same patients. MRCP demonstrated greater sensitivity and specificity (respectively) for screening choledocholithiasis (96.2, 91.8), cholelithiasis (100, 75.8), pancreatic duct stricture (100, 100), and hepatic duct mass (100, 100) and showed statistically significant values. The sensitivity of MRCP is lower for identifying benign and malignant strictures, but its specificity was observed to be reliable.

CONCLUSION

When it comes to determining the severity of obstructive jaundice, both in its early and later stages, the MRCP technique is widely regarded as a reliable means of diagnostic imaging. The diagnostic function of ERCP has been significantly reduced as a result of the precision of MRCP as well as its non-invasive nature. In addition to being a helpful non-invasive method to identify biliary diseases and avoid unnecessary ERCPs and their risks, MRCP offers good diagnostic accuracy for obstructive jaundice.

Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent complications in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The prophylactic use of antibiotics in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is still controversial.

AIM

To assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the rates of complications in patients undergoing elective ERCP.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. A comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases was performed. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The outcomes analyzed included bacteremia, cholangitis, sepsis, pancreatitis, and mortality. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane revised Risk-of-Bias tool for randomized controlled trials. The quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Ten randomized controlled trials with a total of 1757 patients that compared the use of antibiotic and non-antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective ERCP were included. There was no significant difference between groups regarding incidence of cholangitis after ERCP [risk difference (RD) = -0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.05, 0.02, P = 0.32], cholangitis in patients with suspected biliary obstruction (RD = 0.02, 95%CI: -0.08 to 0.13, P = 0.66), cholangitis on intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis (RD = -0.02, 95%CI: -0.05 to 0.01, P = 0.25), septicemia (RD = -0.02, 95%CI: -0.06 to 0.01, P = 0.25), pancreatitis (RD = -0.02, 95%CI: -0.06 to 0.01, P = 0.19), and all-cause mortality (RD = 0.00, 95%CI: -0.01 to 0.01, P = 0.71]. However, the antibiotic prophylaxis group presented a 7% risk reduction in the incidence of bacteremia (RD= -0.07, 95%CI: -0.14 to -0.01, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The prophylactic use of antibiotics in patients undergoing elective ERCP reduces the risk of bacteremia but does not appear to have an impact on the rates of cholangitis, septicemia, pancreatitis, and mortality.

Acute Pancreatitis: A Rare Post-Colonoscopy Sequela

Abdominal pain is a common but benign symptom after colonoscopy. We report a case of acute pancreatitis that occurred just after an elective screening colonoscopy; this is a rare event with very few reported cases. A healthy, asymptomatic male underwent screening colonoscopy at our center and developed abdominal pain and emesis after the procedure. An abdominal X-ray ruled out perforation but laboratory tests revealed elevated levels of amylase and lipase. The patient had no etiological risk factors for pancreatitis. The presumed mechanism of pancreatitis in this case is mechanical and pressure trauma from excessive insufflation, external abdominal pressure, and repeated withdrawal of the colonoscope due to tight angulation of the splenic flexure, a structure that is in close proximity to the pancreatic tail. Acute pancreatitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients who present with abdominal pain after colonoscopy once more common etiologies have been excluded.

Unavailability of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography Adversely Impacts Hospital Outcomes of Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: A National Survey and Propensity-Matched Analysis

OBJECTIVES

There is a paucity of literature assessing the impact of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) availability at hospitals and the management of acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). Thus, we sought to evaluate the impact of ERCP availability on the clinical outcomes of ABP.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2004-2013) was reviewed to identify adult inpatients (≥18 years) with ABP. Clinical outcomes (mortality, severe acute pancreatitis, and health care resource utilization) between hospitals that perform ERCP versus hospitals that do not perform ERCP were compared using multivariate and propensity score-matched analyses.

RESULTS

A majority of the non-ERCP hospitals were rural (73%) in location. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the lack of ERCP availability was independently associated with increased mortality from ABP (odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-2.88). A propensity score-matched cohort analysis confirmed a significant increase in mortality from ABP in non-ERCP hospitals (1.1% vs 0.53%; odds ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-4.15, P = 0.037) compared with ERCP hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

This national survey reveals increased mortality for patients with ABP admitted to hospitals lacking ERCP services. While there is a need to increase ERCP availability in rural areas, optimizing strategies for early transfer of patients with ABP to hospitals with ERCP availability can potentially offset these limitations.

Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review for prevention and treatment

BACKGROUND

Post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is comparatively complex application. Researchers has been investigated prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), since it has been considered to be the most common complication of ERCP. Although ERCP can lead various complications, it can also be avoided.

AIM

To study the published evidence and systematically review the literature on the prevention and treatment for PEP.

METHODS

A systematic literature review on the prevention of PEP was conducted using the electronic databases of ISI Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane Library for relevant articles. The electronic search for the review was performed by using the search terms “Post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis” AND “prevention” through different criteria. The search was restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed between January 2009 and February 2019. Duplicate studies were detected by using EndNote and deleted by the author. PRISMA checklist and flow diagram were adopted for evaluation and reporting. The reference lists of the selected papers were also scanned to find other relevant studies.

RESULTS

726 studies meeting the search criteria and 4 relevant articles found in the edited books about ERCP were identified. Duplicates and irrelevant studies were excluded by screening titles and abstracts and assessing full texts. 54 studies were evaluated for full text review. Prevention methods were categorized into three groups as (1) assessment of patient related factors; (2) pharmacoprevention; and (3) procedural techniques for prevention. Most of studies in the literature showed that young age, female gender, absence of chronic pancreatitis, suspected Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, recurrent pancreatitis and history of previous PEP played a crucial role in posing high risks for PEP. 37 studies designed to assess the impact of 24 different pharmacologic agents to reduce the development of PEP delivered through various administration methods were reviewed. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely used to reduce risks for PEP. Rectal administration of indomethacin immediately prior to or after ERCP in all patients is recommended by European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines to prevent the development of PEP. The majority of the studies reviewed revealed that rectally administered indomethacin had efficacy to prevent PEP. Results of the other studies on the other pharmacological interventions had both controversial and promising results. Thirteen studies conducted to evaluate the efficacy of 4 distinct procedural techniques to prevent the development of PEP were reviewed. Pancreatic Stent Placement has been frequently used in this sense and has potent and promising benefits in the prevention of PEP. Studies on the other procedural techniques have had inconsistent results.

CONCLUSION

Prevention of PEP involves multifactorial aspects, including assessment of patients with high risk factors for alternative therapeutic and diagnostic techniques, administration of pharmacological agents and procedural techniques with highly precise results in the literature.

Prevalence of Anesthetic and Gastrointestinal Complications of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an endoscopic method for treatment of many biliary diseases. With respect to rapid recovery and more patient comfort, this procedure is currently performed under light general anesthesia (GA) or conscious sedation.

OBJECTIVES

The current study aimed to clarify that intravenous sedation or light general anesthesia can be performed without great fear of anesthesia related complications in ERCP patients and sedative doses of propofol can be used safely in outpatient settings under the supervision of an expert anesthesiologist.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study on 1023 ERCP patients under light GA during 2014 - 2018 in Qom, Shahid Beheshti Hospital. Data were collected by a checklist and were analyzed by using chi-square test in SPSS V.22.

RESULTS

From 1023 patients, 501 (48.97 %) were male and 522 (51.03 %) were female with a mean age of 47.2 ± 6.7 years. The most common finding in ERCP was choledocholithiasis (76.15 %). The most common complication was hemodynamic instability (37.01 %) followed by desaturation (11.65 %) both of them ware anesthesia related. Prevalence of GI (gastrointestinal) related complications was 13.39 %. The most common GI related complications were pancreatitis (7.92 %) and bleeding (3.32 %). Total mortality rate was 0.88 %.

CONCLUSIONS

ERCP-related complications are inevitable but can be controlled by early diagnosis and clinical experience. Severe complications and high risk patients may increase the mortality and morbidity of the procedure. Anesthesia related complications are more frequent than GI related unwanted events. Fortunately, the most common anesthesia related complications are readily manageable and are minor in nature when an expert anesthesiologist is present in the scene. Close monitoring of the patient's vital signs should be the mainstay of the safe procedure.

Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for detecting biliary and pancreatic abnormalities in a pediatric population, using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approval with a waiver of informed consent was obtained for this retrospective investigation. Records from the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Department of Radiology were used to identify patients aged ≤ 18 years who had undergone both ERCP and MRCP within a 4-week interval between January 2013 and May 2017. Biliary and pancreatic duct findings were documented for each modality to determine the diagnostic performance of MRCP (with 95% confidence intervals), using ERCP as the reference standard.

RESULTS

54 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean patient age at time of ERCP was 10.4 ± 4.9 years, and 25 (46%) were male. Mean interval between ERCP and MRCP was 11.2 ± 9.7 days. For detection of any abnormality (n = 99 ERCP findings), MRCP had a sensitivity of 76.8% (67.5-84.0%) and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 81.7% (72.7-88.3%). MRCP was 75.7% (59.9-86.6%) sensitive, with a PPV of 84.9% (69.1-93.4%) for biliary findings (n = 37) and 73.5% (59.7-83.8%) sensitive, with a PPV of 78.3% (64.4-87.7%) for pancreatic findings (n = 49). For pancreatobiliary abnormalities (n = 13), MRCP had a sensitivity of 92.3% (66.7-99.6%) and a PPV of 85.7% (60.1-97.5%).

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice, MRCP is moderately sensitive for biliary and pancreatic abnormalities, with false-negative and false-positive examinations being relatively common.

Acute pancreatitis as a complication of routine colonoscopy-A rare case report

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal pain after colonoscopy is a relatively common symptom and usually benign. Colonoscopy-induced pancreatitis is an extremely rare phenomenon that can sometimes be missed leading to delayed diagnosis and treatment.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 53 year old woman presented to the Emergency Department with abdominal pain, a significantly raised lipase and a CT scan revealing pancreatitis. She had no previous history of pancreatitis or any aetiological risk factors. Her pain started 2 h after having a routine outpatient colonoscopy for polyp surveillance. The endoscopist had no difficulty during the procedure and the findings were unremarkable. She developed a Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) and an ileus requiring a prolonged hospital admission. However with conservative management she improved and was discharged on day 11 post-admission in stable condition.

DISCUSSION

The mechanism of colonoscopy-induced pancreatitis is not well understood. Hypotheses include mechanical trauma to the pancreas caused by the endoscope particularly at the splenic flexure, over-insufflation of the colon, external abdominal pressure, and transmural colonic burns via electrocautery causing irritation to the pancreas.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of abdominal pain post-colonoscopy after the more common explanations are excluded.

Risk Evaluation of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-Related Contrast Media Allergic-Like Reaction: A Single Centre Experience

Background and Aims. Few cases of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography- (ERCP-) related contrast media (CM) adverse reactions have been reported in the current literature. There is a lack of standardisation in practice regarding premedication prophylaxis for at-risk patients undergoing ERCP and there are few data to guide the practitioners. Our goal is to evaluate the risk of CM adverse reaction in a group of patients with a past history of allergic-like reaction to iodine product undergoing ERCP. Methods. A retrospective chart review study was performed of patients who underwent ERCP at our single centre from January 2010 to December 2015. Results. 2295 ERCPs were performed among 1766 patients. No anaphylactoid or severe adverse reaction occurred. One (0.04%) ERCP-related CM benign reaction was reported in a patient known for penicillin allergy. Among 127 ERCPs performed on patients with a prior adverse reaction to iodine, 121 procedures were done without and 6 with a premedication prophylaxis. In both groups, no ERCP-related CM reaction occurred. Conclusions. To our knowledge, we report the largest cohort of iodine allergic patients undergoing ERCP ever published. These results suggest that ERCP-related CM adverse reactions are very rare even among patients at risk for CM reaction.

Diagnostic accuracy of EUS compared with MRCP in detecting choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy in head-to-head studies

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is a wide range of reported sensitivity and specificity for EUS and MRCP in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis, with lack of a proper meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy by using head-to-head comparison. Here, we aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of EUS and MRCP in detecting choledocholithiasis by using appropriate methodology recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration.

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic literature search up to January 2017 was done by 2 reviewers for prospective cohort studies comparing EUS and MRCP to a reference standard for detecting choledocholithiasis. The acceptable reference standards were considered ERCP, intraoperative cholangiography, or clinical follow-up >3 months for negative cases. Quality of the included studies was measured by using the QUADAS-2 tool. A bivariate hierarchical model was used to perform the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Summary receiver operating characteristics were developed and the area under the curve was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 5 of 32 studies were included. No study presented a high risk of bias. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 (range, 0.91-0.99) and 0.90 (range, 0.83-0.94) for EUS and 0.87 (range, 0.80-0.93) and 0.92 (range, 0.87-0.96) for MRCP. The overall diagnostic odds ratio of EUS was significantly higher than the one with MRCP (162.5 vs 79.0, respectively; P = .008). Further analysis showed that this was mainly due to the significantly higher sensitivity of EUS as compared with that of MRCP (P = .006). The specificity was not significantly different between 2 modalities (P = .42).

CONCLUSION

Both EUS and MRCP provide good diagnostic accuracy, with EUS providing statically better diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity, with comparable specificity. EUS should be incorporated in the diagnostic algorithm in patients suspected of choledocholithiasis whenever appropriate.

Prospective comparison of prophylactic antibiotic use between intravenous moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone for high-risk patients with post-ERCP cholangitis

BACKGROUND

The use of prophylactic antibiotics before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is recommended by all major international gastroenterological societies, especially in the presence of an obstructed biliary system. This study compared the occurrence rate of post-procedural complications, including cholangitis and septicemia, between prophylactic intravenous moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone in patients with bile duct obstruction scheduled for therapeutic ERCP.

METHODS

From November 2013 to July 2015, 86 consecutive patients with biliary obstruction with one or more factors predicting benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to ERCP were included in the current randomized open-label non-inferiority trial (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT02098486). Intravenous moxifloxacin (400 mg/day) or ceftriaxone (2 g/day) were given 90 minutes before ERCP, and were administered for more than 3 days if the patient developed symptoms and signs of cholangitis or septicemia. Recalcitrant cholangitis was defined as persistence of cholangitis for more than 5 days after ERCP or recurrence of cholangitis within 30 days after ERCP.

RESULTS

Recalcitrant cholangitis occurred in 1 (2.3%) and 2 (4.8%) patients receiving intravenous moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone group, respectively (P=0.612). Septicemia was noted in 1 (2.3%) and 1 (2.4%) patient in intravenous moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone group, respectively (P=1.0). The mean hospital stay was also not significantly different between the moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone groups (8.8±7.2 vs 9.1±9.4 days, P=0.867). Antibiotic resistance of the isolated pathogens by in vitro activity assay was noted in 1 (2.3%) and 2 (4.8%) patients in the moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone group, respectively (P=0.612).

CONCLUSION

Intravenous moxifloxacin is not inferior to intravenous ceftriaxone for the prophylactic treatment of post-ERCP cholangitis and cholangitis-associated morbidity.

Predictive risk factors associated with cholangitis following ERCP

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with stent placement is used for the management of many pancreaticobiliary disorders. It is generally safe with a few short-term complications. The risk factors for the development of post-ERCP cholangitis due to stent occlusion have not been previously described. This study identified such risk factors among patients undergoing ERCP and stent placement for pancreatic or biliary obstruction.

METHODS

3648 ERCPs performed at the University of Louisville from 2008 to 2016 were reviewed. Data including patient demographics, diagnostic, laboratory, and ERCP related data were included. Patients were classified as having post-ERCP cholangitis if they developed jaundice, fever, right upper quadrant abdominal pain, and confirmatory findings of stent occlusion and/or purulent drainage at the time of repeat ERCP. These patients were compared to those who did not develop post-ERCP cholangitis using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 431 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 57 (13.2%) developed post-ERCP cholangitis. The average age of patients was 57 years with 57% women and 43% men. On univariate analysis, patients developing post-ERCP cholangitis were more likely to be of increased age, have higher white blood cell count (WBC), total bilirubin (TBili), AST, ALT, and alkaline phosphatase (AlkPhos), and a decreased serum albumin level. Risk factors for post-ERCP cholangitis due to stent occlusion identified on multivariate analysis include: a diagnosis of cancer, the placement of multiple biliary stents at index ERCP, and low serum albumin level.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of post-ERCP cholangitis due to stent occlusion is strongly associated with the presence of malignancy, the placement of multiple biliary stents, and low serum albumin. A decreased threshold to monitor for stent occlusion, including routine liver function tests and prophylactic stent removal or exchange, should be employed in patients with these characteristics.

Complications of ERCP

Even though considered safe, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is among the endoscopic procedures associated with the highest rate of complications. Post ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication of ERCP. Several independent risk factors have been associated with PEP. Prophylactic PD stenting has been shown to be highly effective in preventing PEP. More recent studies have suggested that NSAIDs, especially rectal indomethacin, could by itself be effective in preventing PEP. However, head to head RCTs comparing PD stents with NSAIDs would be required to confirm this. Other complications include ERCP induced bleeding, perforation, and cholangitis. Bleeding is related to morphological, procedural, and patient related factors. Early identification and correction of the risk factors are of paramount importance in preventing bleeding. Risk of infection is particularly high during ERCP. It is important to ensure complete drainage of obstructed biliary system in order to reduce the risk of post-ERCP cholangitis.

Pharmacokinetics of Three Contrast Media in Experimental Pancreatography

Diatrizoate, iohexol and ioxaglate were compared in experimental pancreatography in piglets. Outflow of contrast medium (CM) through the pancreatic papilla was permitted (n=14) or impaired (n=17) during examination. The CM concentrations were measured in portal and systemic plasma and in lymph to study the absorption of CM. Absorption of diatrizoate and iohexol was similar in both types of experiment, but radiographically, diatrizoate escaped significantly earlier from the pancreatic duct when outflow was permitted (p<0.01), suggesting that the CM was absorbed mainly during injection. Ioxaglate concentrations rose more slowly in systemic plasma and lymph, and fell more slowly in the portal plasma than those of diatrizoate and iohexol, which suggests that ioxaglate was absorbed over a longer period. When outflow was impaired, ioxaglate concentrations remained on a lower level, indicating less penetration in the pancreatic parenchyma. CM absorption varied markedly within each group, suggesting that variations in intraductal pressure and flow are more important in absorption than the type of CM used.

Biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation: May contrast-enhanced MR Cholangiography provide additional information?

PURPOSE

To assess whether contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR Cholangiography may provide additional information in the evaluation of biliary complications in orthotopic liver transplant recipients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty liver transplant patients with suspicion of biliary adverse events underwent MR imaging at 1.5 T scanner. After acquisition of axial T1-/T2-weighted images and conventional T2-weighted MR Cholangiography (image set 1), 3D gradient-echo T1-weighted fat-suppressed LAVA (Liver Acquisition with Volume Acceleration) sequences were obtained about 30 min after intravenous infusion of mangafodipir trisodium (Mn-DPDP,Teslascan(®)) (image set 2). The diagnostic value of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR Cholangiography in the detection of biliary complications was tested by separate analysis results of image set 1 alone and image set 1 and 2 together. MRI results were correlated with direct cholangiography in 46 patients, surgery in 14 and/or clinical-radiological follow-up in the remaining 20 cases.

RESULTS

The level of confidence in the assessment of biliary adverse events was significantly increased by the administration of mangafodipir trisodium (p < 0.05). Particularly, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted LAVA sequences tended to out-perform conventional T2-weighted MR Cholangiography in the delineation of anastomotic and non-anastomotic biliary strictures and in the diagnosis of biliary leak.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR Cholangiography may improve the level of diagnostic confidence provided by conventional T2-weighted MR Cholangiography in the evaluation of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Brazilian society of hepatology recommendations for the diagnosis and management of autoimmune diseases of the liver

ABSTRACT In order to draw evidence-based recommendations concerning the management of autoimmune diseases of the liver, the Brazilian Society of Hepatology has sponsored a single-topic meeting in October 18th, 2014 at São Paulo. An organizing committee comprised of seven investigators was previously elected by the Governing Board to organize the scientific agenda as well as to select twenty panelists to make a systematic review of the literature and to present topics related to the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cirrhosis and their overlap syndromes. After the meeting, all panelists gathered together for the discussion of the topics and the elaboration of those recommendations. The text was subsequently submitted for suggestions and approval of all members of the Brazilian Society of Hepatology through its homepage. The present paper is the final version of the reviewed manuscript organized in topics, followed by the recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Hepatology.

Can Rectal Diclofenac Prevent Post Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis?

BACKGROUND

Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been shown to reduce the incidence of post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP). There were various trials using different routes and dosages of NSAIDs but meta-analysis revealed inconsistent results.

AIMS

The aims of this study were to determine the efficacy of rectal diclofenac in preventing PEP and to evaluate any adverse events.

METHODS

This was a randomized, open-label, two-arm, prospective clinical trial. Only patients at high risk of developing PEP were recruited. They received 100 mg rectal diclofenac or no intervention immediately after ERCP. The patients were reviewed 30 days after discharge to evaluate any adverse event.

RESULTS

Among 144 recruited patients, 69 (47.9%) received diclofenac and 75 (52.1%) had no intervention. Eleven patients (7.6%) developed PEP, in which seven were from the diclofenac group and four were in the control group. Eight cases of PEP (5.5%) were mild and three cases (2.1%) were moderate. The differences in pancreatitis incidence and severity between both groups were not statistically significant. There were 11 adverse events reported. Clinically significant bleeding happened in four patients (2.8%): one from the diclofenac group and three from the control group. Other events included cholangitis: two patients (2.9%) from the diclofenac group and four (5.3%) from the control group. One patient from the diclofenac group (1.4%) had a perforation which was treated conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, prophylactic rectal diclofenac did not significantly decrease the incidence of PEP among patients at high risk for developing PEP. However, the administration of diclofenac was fairly safe with few clinical adverse events.

[Methods of acute pancreatitis prevention after endoscopic transpapillary interventions]

AIM

To optimize preventive methods of acute postoperative pancreatitis in endoscopic transpapillary interventions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

It is performed parallel unblinded randomized investigation. The first group included 98 patients who underwent endoscopic transpapillary interventions and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). The second group consisted of 97 patients in whom opiate analgesic intramuscularly and indomethacin per rectum were applied.

RESULTS

Study revealed that acute pancreatitis has been diagnosed significantly more seldom in patients after TEA than in the second group (OR 0.22, CI 95%, 0.06-0.83). Thus in TEA-group pancreatitis was verified in 3.1% (3 of 98 patients), in the second group - in 12.4% (12 of 97 patients). Incidence of pancreatitis decreased from 23.3% (10 of 43) to 4.3% (2 of 46) among high risk patients (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.75).

CONCLUSION

TEA is effective and justified preventive method in patients with high risk of postoperative pancreatitis. In low risk patients use of indomethacin per rectum is preferred compared with TEA due to its invasiveness.

Complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy in liver transplant recipients: A retrospective single-centre study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Biliary tract complications after liver transplantation are usually treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. When biliary tract intervention is indicated, endoscopic sphincterotomy is often required. However, data regarding complication rates after endoscopic sphincterotomy in liver transplant recipients are limited. This study therefore investigated complication rates during the first 15 days after endoscopic sphincterotomy in liver transplant recipients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed 157 consecutive liver transplant recipients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic sphincterotomy between January 1998 and August 2013 at the University Hospital of Münster, Germany. Complications that occurred within the first 15 days after the procedure were recorded, and complication rates were compared between patients who underwent conventional and precut endoscopic sphincterotomy.

RESULTS

A total of 24 complications (15.2%) were recorded, including 9 cases (5.7%) of pancreatitis, 6 cases (3.8%) of bleeding, and 1 case (0.6%) of perforation. There were no procedure-related deaths. There were no significant differences in complication rates between the two sphincterotomy techniques. The rate of post-procedural pancreatitis decreased over time.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic sphincterotomy is a safe procedure in liver transplant recipients. The procedure-related complication rate is reasonable and most complications can be managed conservatively.

Is ESR Important for Predicting Post-ERCP Pancreatitis?

BACKGROUND

Pancreatitis remains the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), resulting in substantial morbidity and occasional mortality. There are notable controversies and conflicting reports about risk factors of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP).

AIM

To evaluate the potential risk factors for PEP at a referral tertiary center, as a sample of the Iranian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Baseline characteristics and clinical as well as paraclinical information of 780 patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP at Taleghani hospital in Tehran between 2008 and 2012 were reviewed. Data were collected prior to the ERCP, at the time of the procedure, and 24-72 hours after discharge. PEP was diagnosed according to consensus criteria.

RESULTS

Of the 780 patients who underwent diagnostic ERCP, pancreatitis developed in 26 patients (3.3%). In the multivariable risk model, significant risk factors with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were age <65 years (OR = 10.647, P = 0.023) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) >30 (OR = 6.414, P < 0.001). Female gender, history of recurrent pancreatitis, pre-ERCP hyperamylasemia, and difficult or failed cannulation could not predict PEP. There was no significant difference in the rate of PEP in wire-guided cannulation versus biliary cannulation using a sphincterotome and contrast injection as the conventional method.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing ERCP may be safer in the elderly. Patients with high ESR may be at greater risk of PEP, which warrants close observation of these patients for signs of pancreatitis after ERCP.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-associated AmpC Escherichia coli outbreak

BACKGROUND

We identified an outbreak of AmpC-producing Escherichia coli infections resistant to third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems (CR) among 7 patients who had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at hospital A during November 2012-August 2013. Gene sequencing revealed a shared novel mutation in a bla CMY gene and a distinctive fumC/ fimH typing profile.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the extent and epidemiologic characteristics of the outbreak, identify potential sources of transmission, design and implement infection control measures, and determine the association between the CR E. coli and AmpC E. coli circulating at hospital A.

METHODS

We reviewed laboratory, medical, and endoscopy reports, and endoscope reprocessing procedures. We obtained cultures from endoscopes after reprocessing as well as environmental samples and conducted pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and gene sequencing on phenotypic AmpC isolates from patients and endoscopes. Cases were those infected with phenotypic AmpC isolates (both carbapenem-susceptible and CR) and identical bla CMY-2, fumC, and fimH alleles or related pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns.

RESULTS

Thirty-five of 49 AmpC E. coli tested met the case definition, including all CR isolates. All cases had complicated biliary disease and had undergone at least 1 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at hospital A. Mortality at 30 days was 16% for all patients and 56% for CR patients. Two of 8 reprocessed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography scopes harbored AmpC that matched case isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Environmental cultures were negative. No breaches in infection control were identified. Endoscopic reprocessing exceeded manufacturer's recommended cleaning guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Recommended reprocessing guidelines are not sufficient.

ERCP-related adverse events in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

ERCP is frequently used in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) for cancer surveillance and treatment of dominant strictures.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence and risk factors for ERCP-related adverse events in patients with PSC.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of ERCPs performed from 1998 to 2012.

SETTING

Referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 294 consecutive patients with PSC who underwent a total of 657 ERCPs.

INTERVENTIONS

ERCP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

ERCP-related adverse events and predictive factors were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

ERCP use in patients with PSC showed a significant increase during the second half of the study period (2006-2012) compared with the first half (1998-2005) (437 vs 220 procedures; P = .04). Primary cannulation was successful in 634 procedures (96.6%) or in 271 of 294 patients (92.2%). Access to the bile duct was achieved with a needle-knife in 19 procedures (2.9%), whereas ERCP was unsuccessful in 4 of 657 procedures (0.6%), and successful percutaneous drainage was performed. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was diagnosed in 8 (1.2%), cholangitis in 16 (2.4%), and bleeding in 4 (0.7%) procedures. Overall, risk of any adverse event was 28 of 657 (4.3%) procedures. On multivariate analysis, performing biliary sphincterotomy (odds ratio [OR] 5.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.01-12.60; P = .001) and passage of a guidewire into the pancreatic duct (OR 4.54; 95% CI, 1.44-14.30; P = .010) were independently associated with an increased risk of any adverse event.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study.

CONCLUSION

Cholangitis appears to be the most common adverse event despite intraprocedural antibiotic use. There was a low risk of adverse events in patients with PSC undergoing ERCP.

Has intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy become obsolete in the era of preoperative endoscopic retrograde and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography?

BACKGROUND

Preoperative ERCP, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), and intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) are standard procedures in evaluating patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. This study evaluates the changing practice patterns over time of these 3 procedures in a large cohort of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) at a single tertiary care center.

STUDY DESIGN

Data from all patients undergoing an LC with or without preoperative ERCP, MRCP, or an IOC from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2013 were retrospectively reviewed from billing data obtained by CPT code and analyzed by chi-square testing.

RESULTS

During 10 years, 7,427 patients underwent successful LC. The number of patients undergoing successful IOC (11.9% to 7.6%) or preoperative ERCP (7.2% to 1.5%) decreased significantly during that time interval (p < 0.01). In the last 6 years, 4,506 patients underwent successful LC. The number of patients from this group undergoing a preoperative MRCP (0.9% to 8.6%) or MRCP and ERCP (0.4% to 3.6%) increased significantly (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a shift from IOC and preoperative ERCP to preoperative MRCP alone or with ERCP, a significant percentage (7.6%) of patients still underwent IOC in 2013. Use of IOC during LC has decreased but is not considered obsolete, rather, it remains a valuable tool for the evaluation of bile duct anatomy, bile duct injury, or suspected choledocholithiasis. Intraoperative cholangiography during uncomplicated LC should be emphasized in teaching programs to insure general surgery resident competency with the procedure.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation: outcomes and complications

Biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) still remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The most frequent complications are strictures and leakages in OLT cases with duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction (D-D), which can be treated with dilatation or stent placement during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), although this procedure is burdened with potentially severe complications, such as retroperitoneal perforation, acute pancreatitis, septic cholangitis, bleeding, recurrence of stones, strictures due to healing process. The aim of the study was to analyze the outcome of this treatment and the complications related to the procedure. Among 1634 adult OLTs, we compared postprocedural complications and mortality rates with a group of 5852 nontransplanted patients (n-OLTs) who underwent ERCP. Of 472 (28,8%) post-OLT biliary complications, 319 (67.6%) occurred in D-D biliary anstomosis cases and 94 (29.5%) patients underwent 150 ERCP sessions. Among 49/80 patients (61.2%) who completed the procedure, ERCP treatment was successful. Overall complication rate was 10.7% in OLT and 12.8% in n-OLT (P = NS). Compared with the n-OLT group, post-ERCP bleeding was more frequent in OLT (5.3% vs 1.3%, P = .0001), while the incidence of pancreatitis was lower (4.7% vs 9.6%, P = .04). Procedure-related mortality rate was 0% in OLT and 0.1% in n-OLT (P = NS). ERCP is a safe procedure for post-OLT biliary complications in the presence of a D-D anastomosis. Morbidity and mortality related with this procedure are acceptable and similar to those among nontransplanted population.

Acinarization (parenchymal blush) observed during secretin-enhanced MRCP: clinical implications

OBJECTIVE

T2 hyperintensity of pancreatic acini during secretin-enhanced MRCP is called "acinarization." We sought to determine the clinical significance of this finding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were selected if the radiology report included the phrases "acin*" (where * represented a wild card search) or "blush" using the institution's customized lexicon-search software. Sixty-seven consecutive patients without acinarization on secretin-enhanced MRCP who also underwent ERCP were enrolled as the control group. The intensity of acinarization was classified into three groups: grade 0, no visible acinarization; grade 1, barely visible parenchymal hyperintensity; or grade 2, easily visible parenchymal hyperintensity. ERCP findings of ductal abnormalities and basal pancreatic sphincter manometry were recorded.

RESULTS

There were higher frequencies of divisum (p = 0.001) and of a clinical history of recurrent acute pancreatitis (p < 0.001) and higher basal pancreatic sphincter of Oddi manometric pressure measurements (p = 0.008) in the acinarization group. There was no difference in the frequency of ERCP-defined chronic pancreatitis (p = 0.10) between the groups. In patients with acinarization, a higher mean sphincter pressure was seen in patients with more intense acinarization than in those with faint acinarization, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.22). Ampullary tumors were found in four patients with acinarization.

CONCLUSION

Acinarization probably occurs in patients with a propensity for increased pancreatic ductal pressure (i.e., patients with divisum, elevated basal pancreatic sphincter pressure, ampullary tumor) and adequate exocrine function (absence of severe chronic pancreatitis).

Endoscopic ultrasound: valuable tool for diagnosis of biliary complications in liver transplant recipients?

BACKGROUND

Biliary complications after liver transplantation (LT) are still common and are an important cause of mortality and morbidity. Until now, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been considered the gold standard for diagnosing such complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and therapeutic impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the management of biliary complications after LT.

METHODS

Thirty-seven liver transplant patients who presented with clinical, biochemical, sonographic, and/or histological evidence of biliary complications, and who first received EUS followed by ERCP, were enrolled into this prospective observational study. Subsequently, we evaluated the value of EUS in detecting and classifying biliary complications after LT.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven biliary complications were detected in 32 patients. Endoscopic ultrasound showed an overall sensitivity and accuracy of 94.6 % each. In cases of biliary cast and ischemic cholangiopathy, EUS was found to be diagnostically superior to ERCP and has had, in these cases, a significant impact on clinical decision-making. However, EUS was less reliable when diagnosing anastomotic strictures.

CONCLUSION

EUS can complement ERCP to improve diagnosis of biliary complications after LT and help guide treatment strategies to address these complications.

Diagnosis and classification of primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic disease of the liver and that is characterized by progressive inflammation, fibrosis, and stricturing of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. It is progressive in most patients and leads to cirrhosis. It is a rare disease, mostly affecting people of northern European descent, males greater than females. The diagnosis is best established by contrast cholangiography, which reveals a characteristic picture of diffuse, multifocal strictures and focal dilation of the bile ducts, leading to a beaded appearance. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is present in ~75% of the patients with PSC, mostly ulcerative colitis (~85% of the cases). In addition to biliary cirrhosis, complications of PSC include dominant strictures of the bile ducts, cholangitis, cholangiocarcinoma, colon dysplasia and cancer in patients with IBD, gallbladder polyps and cancer, and hepatic osteodystrophy. The etiology of PSC is not clear, but studies are ongoing. The median survival without liver transplantation is 12 to 15 years after diagnosis. Currently there are no effective treatments except liver transplantation. Immunosuppressive medications have not been shown to be effective but antibiotics and anti-fibrotic agents seem promising.

The role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to identify whether magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) can be used selectively in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis to detect choledocholithiasis, based on liver function tests (LFTs) and ultrasonography appearance.

METHODS

All patients admitted between January 2008 and January 2011 with gallstone pancreatitis (amylase >300u/l) who underwent MRCP were included in the study. LFTs and radiology reports were obtained from the respective computer systems.

RESULTS

Overall, 173 patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis underwent MRCP and 30% (52/173) showed choledocholithiasis. The mean bilirubin level was significantly higher in those with choledocholithiasis (46 ±5μmol/l vs 36 ±3μmol/l, p=0.0388) although there was no significant difference in alkaline phosphatase (276 ±25iu/l vs 229 ±16iu/l, p=0.1154). However, sensitivity of abnormal bilirubin (>21μmol/l) for choledocholithiasis was only 62% and specificity was 41%. Sensitivity of abnormal alkaline phosphatase (>140iu/l) for choledocholithiasis was only 75% and specificity was 37%. There was a significant association between biliary dilatation on ultrasonography and choledocholithiasis on MRCP (p=0.0099) although the sensitivity of biliary dilatation for choledocholithiasis was only 44% and the specificity was 79%. Furthermore, there was no difference in the incidence of choledocholithiasis on MRCP for those patients with persistently deranged LFTs versus those whose LFTs returned to normal (relative risk: 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 0.61-1.89, p=1.00). Overall, 10% of patients with choledocholithiasis on MRCP had entirely normal LFTs on admission and no biliary dilatation or choledocholithiasis on ultrasonography.

CONCLUSIONS

All patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis should undergo specific imaging, preferably MRCP, to exclude choledocholithiasis as LFTs and ultrasonography are inaccurate in predicting common bile duct stones.

TG13 current terminology, etiology, and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis

While referring to the evidence adopted in the Tokyo Guidelines 2007 (TG07) as well as subsequently obtained evidence, further discussion took place on terminology, etiology, and epidemiological data. In particular, new findings have accumulated on the occurrence of symptoms in patients with gallstones, frequency of severe cholecystitis and cholangitis, onset of cholecystitis and cholangitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and medications, mortality rate, and recurrence rate. The primary etiology of acute cholangitis/cholecystitis is the presence of stones. Next to stones, the most significant etiology of acute cholangitis is benign/malignant stenosis of the biliary tract. On the other hand, there is another type of acute cholecystitis, acute acalculous cholecystitis, in which stones are not involved as causative factors. Risk factors for acute acalculous cholecystitis include surgery, trauma, burn, and parenteral nutrition. After 2000, the mortality rate of acute cholangitis has been about 10 %, while that of acute cholecystitis has generally been less than 1 %. After the publication of TG07, diagnostic criteria and severity assessment criteria were standardized, and the distribution of cases according to severity and comparison of clinical data among target populations have become more subjective. The concept of healthcare-associated infections is important in the current treatment of infection. The treatment of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis substantially differs from that of community-acquired infections. Cholangitis and cholecystitis as healthcare-associated infections are clearly described in the updated Tokyo Guidelines (TG13). Free full-text articles and a mobile application of TG13 are available via http://www.jshbps.jp/en/guideline/tg13.html.

Preoperative hepatobiliary imaging: what does the radiologist need to know?

Accurate preoperative reporting is essential in guiding the surgeon in deciding when and how to operate safely and effectively. Critically, this relies on an understanding of the operative issues faced by the surgeon, which is not always appreciated by the radiologist. This paper therefore aims to address this, first focusing on relevant anatomical variants, and then issues specific to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hepatic transplantation, and finally hepatic resection (including cholangiocarcinoma resection). Throughout the paper, there is an emphasis on associated surgical techniques to add context to the discussion.

Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Current and Future Management Strategies

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease. The etiology of this disorder is unknown and there are no effective medical therapies. PSC is associated with inflammatory bowel disease and an increased risk for hepatobiliary and colorectal malignancies. The aim of this review is to highlight the clinical features and diagnostic approach to patients with suspected PSC, characterize associated comorbidities, review screening strategies for PSC associated malignancies and review contemporary and future therapies.

Risk factors of post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography bacteremia

Background/Aims

Bacteremia following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a severe complication, but the risk factors for this condition have not yet been clearly determined. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors of post-ERCP bacteremia.

Methods

Among patients who underwent ERCP from June 2006 to May 2009, we selected patients without any signs of infection prior to the ERCP procedures. Of these patients, we further selected those who experienced bacteremia after ERCP as well as two-fold age and sex-matched controls who did not experience bacteremia after ERCP procedures. We compared clinical, laboratory and technical aspects between these two groups.

Results

There were 70 patients (3.1%) who developed bacteremia after ERCP. In the multivariate analysis, a history of previous liver transplantation, an elevated serum alkaline phosphatase level and an endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage procedure were independent risk factors of post-ERCP bacteremia (p=0.006, p=0.001, and p=0.004, respectively). The microbiologic analysis revealed the presence of gram-negative organisms in 80% of the cases, and 11 patients had infections with bacteria expressing extended spectrum β-lactamases. Pseudomonas infection was significantly more common in patients who received liver transplantation as compared to patients without transplantation (p=0.014).

Conclusions

A history of liver transplantation, elevated serum alkaline phosphatase levels and endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage procedure were independent risk factors of post-ERCP bacteremia and require additional attention in future studies.

Does heparin coating reduce encrustation of biliary plastic endoprostheses? A prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

Common bile duct stenting is widely performed for bridging benign and malignant obstructions. A major limitation is early stent occlusion making regular stent exchange necessary. Covalent binding of glycosaminoglycanes to polyethylene stents proved to reduce encrustation in urological implants. Since development of urological and biliary stent occlusion shows parallels, the aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of heparin coating of biliary endoprostheses in preventing encrustation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a prospective randomized trial, heparin-coated and native stents were endoscopically placed for almost 90 days on average. After removal, all stents were dried (50°C, 24 h), weighed and after longitudinal incision visible encrustation and discoloration recorded. Fifty-three patients (21 females/32 males, 70 ± 12 (42-87) years) were included; 13 patients (4 females/9 males, 58-79 years) completed the study according to the protocol.

RESULTS

After removal, mean weight of encrustation in native stents was more than double as high as of covered stents (native: 37.9 ± 19.8 (16-93) mg; covered: 17.6 ± 6.7 (9-33) mg). In 12 of 13 cases, the encrustation weight of the native stent was higher than that of the corresponding covered stent in the same patient. Premature stent explantation became necessary in 3 of 13 native stents, because of recurrent jaundice or cholangitis but only in 1 of 13 covered stents. After longitudinal incision, the three uncovered stents showed excessive encrustation whereas no significant encrustation was found in the covered prosthesis. Altogether, covered stents showed less visible accumulation of clogging material and discoloration than native stents.

CONCLUSIONS

Covalent bound heparin is highly effective in preventing encrustation of biliary polyethylene endoprostheses.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography complications in the era of cholangioscopy: is there an increased risk?

BACKGROUND

Single-operator cholangioscopy allows direct visualization of the biliary tree and is being used in the diagnosis and treatment of various biliary conditions. To date, there are few data examining complications of single-operator cholangioscopy.

METHODS

We evaluated all endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures over a two-year period and compared its complication rate to single-operator cholangioscopy in a tertiary care centre with extensive experience in single-operator cholangioscopy. A total of 2087 patients (55% men, mean age 57.4±16.4) had a therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, out of which 169 also had single-operator cholangioscopy performed on them.

RESULTS

169 single-operator cholangioscopy procedures were performed (53% men) with a mean patient age of 60.7±15.2 years. Out of the 2087 patients, 160 complications occurred (7.7%), and included pancreatitis (n=47, 2.2%), infection (n=24, 1.1%), bleeding (n=44, 2.1%), perforation (n=16, 0.8%) and other (n=29, 1.4%). Univariate analysis on overall complications identified seven variables with a p value<0.2, which were included in the multivariate analysis. Biliary sphincterotomy, pancreatic duct stent placement, and ampullectomy were associated with increased complications. Single-operator cholangioscopy was not associated with increased complications on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Single-operator cholangioscopy is not associated with an increased rate of complications when compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The types and frequencies of overall endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography complications are similar to previously reported series.

Biliary complications after liver transplantation: addition of T1-weighted images to MR cholangiopancreatography facilitates detection of cast in biliary cast syndrome

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiopancreatography pulse sequences in comparison with MR cholangiopancreatography sequences combined with nonenhanced T1-weighted images in the detection of biliary cast syndrome in liver transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. Institutional review board approval was obtained. MR images in 95 patients who were examined after liver transplantation and who presented with symptoms of biliary obstruction were examined. Two separate sets of images, MR cholangiopancreatograms and MR cholangiopancreatograms plus T1-weighted images, were evaluated independently by three readers. Sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values for biliary cast syndrome were calculated, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated. The results of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography served as the reference standard. To determine interobserver agreement, κ values were calculated.

RESULTS

Cast appeared hyperintense on nonenhanced T1-weighted images. Sensitivities for T2-weighted MR cholangiopancreatography data alone were 0.65, 0.70, and 0.55 for the three readers. Adding unenhanced T1-weighted images resulted in sensitivities of 0.95, 0.90, and 0.90, respectively. Specificities for MR cholangiopancreatography alone and for MR cholangiopancreatography plus T1-weighted images were high on average (0.98, 0.97, and 0.97 vs 1.0 for all readers, respectively). Interobserver agreement was good for T2-weighted MR cholangiopancreatography (κ for readers 1 and 2 = 0.589, κ for readers 2 and 3 = 0.593, κ for readers 1 and 3 = 0.734) and was excellent for MR cholangiopancreatography plus T1-weighted images (κ for readers 1 and 2 = 0.806, κ for readers 2 and 3 = 0.881, κ for readers 1 and 3 = 0.848).

CONCLUSION

The combination of T2-weighted MR cholangiopancreatography and T1-weighted imaging yields higher diagnostic performance than MR cholangiopancreatography alone. Therefore, readers evaluating liver MR images with regard to biliary complications after liver transplantation should also look at the bile ducts on unenhanced T1-weighted images, as biliary cast might be more easily depicted on these images.

The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; a retrospective single-center evaluation

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) can be complicated by post-ERCP cholangitis even when performed by experienced endoscopists. Therefore, antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for certain patients, but controversy exists as to which patient groups really benefit from this strategy. We retrospectively evaluated the use of antibiotics in a primary teaching hospital in the Netherlands with regard to the incidence of post-ERCP cholangitis and cholecystitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective single-center evaluation in a primary teaching hospital. All consecutive ERCPs between 2000 and 2006 were studied. Primary end point was the incidence of post-ERCP cholangitis and cholecystitis, divided into four categories: definite, likely, possible and unlikely. Additionally, occurrence of complications such as pneumonia, post-ERCP pancreatitis, perforation of the duodenum, substantial bleeding and the need for re-ERCP within 5 days was scored.

RESULTS

Five hundred forty ERCPs in 327 patients were screened. Of these, 292 ERCPs performed in 193 patients were included. Eight ERCPs (2.7%) of all ERCPs were followed by definite cholangitis and two ERCPs (0.7%) by likely cholangitis. The occurrence rate of ERCP-related complications remained low.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that with our current policy of restricted use of antibiotic prophylaxis the overall incidence of biliary tract infections is low.

Comorbidities, sphincterotomy, and balloon dilation predict post-ERCP adverse events in PSC patients: operator experience is protective

BACKGROUND

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic disease. Interventional ERCP improves survival in PSC patients.

AIMS

To describe the frequency and risk factors for post-ERCP adverse events in patients with PSC via multivariate analysis.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study included patients with a diagnosis of PSC who underwent ERCP at academic institutions between February 2000 and October 2009. Demographis, co-morbid conditions, antibiotic use, cannulation method, ERCP maneuvers and 30-day post-ERCP adverse events were collected. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 185 procedures were performed on 75 PSC patients (58 M,17 F). Seven endoscopists performed ERCPs. Comorbidies included ulcerative colitis (44%, n = 33), Crohn's disease (12%, n = 9 patients), Cirrhosis (8%, n = 6 patients) and autoimmune hepatitis (2.7%, n = 2). Cannulation was achieved using dye-free guidewire cannulation techniques in 139/185 procedures (76%) and with contrast-based techniques in 46/185 procedures (24%). Thirty-day post-ERCP adverse events included post-ERCP pancreatitis (5%, n = 9, cholangitis (1%, n = 2), acute cholecystitis (0.5%, n = 1), stent occlusion (0.5%, n = 1), stent migration (0.5%, n = 1), and bile leak (0.5%, n = 1). In the multivariate analysis, associations with specific endoscopists who performed the procedure (P = 0.01), biliary dilation (P = 0.02), sphincterotomy (P = 0.03), presence of cirrhosis (P = 0.05), Crohn's disease (P < 0.001), and autoimmune hepatitis (P < 0.001) significantly predicted a complication following ERCP. Gender, stenting during procedure, presence of a dominant stricture, and cholangitis were not predictive for post-ERCP adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors predicting 30-day post-ERCP adverse events included certain co-morbid conditions, the endoscopist ERCP volume, maneuvers during ERCP including dilation and sphincterotomy. Stenting was not associated with adverse events.

[Use of gadolinium as contrast agent in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with iodine allergy]

INTRODUCTION

Radiologic contrasts are required during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The most frequently used are iodine-based contrast media. Controversy still surrounds the optimal strategy in patients with previous adverse reactions to iodine contrasts that need to undergo an ERCP.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a gadolinium-derived contrast medium in patients with previous reactions to iodine-derived agents during ERCP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirteen ERCP were performed in 11 patients with well-established adverse reactions to iodine compounds. ERCP was carried out with gadobutrol, a non-ionic gadolinium compound and without prophylaxis.

RESULTS

In all patients, ERCP were satisfactorily completed. Thirteen cholangiograms and one pancreatogram were obtained. All procedures were technically successful, allowing diagnosis and endotherapy. The quality of the images was good, similar to those obtained with standard contrast media, and did not represent a limitation. No contrast-related adverse events were observed, and there were no post-ERCP complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Gadolinium-derived agents are a safe and effective alternative in iodine-allergic patients.