Endoscopic Nd:YAG laser therapy for villous adenomas of the right colon

Indications and outcomes of endoscopic resection for non-pedunculated colorectal lesions: A narrative review

In the last years, endoscopic techniques gained a crucial role in the treatment of colorectal flat lesions. At the same time, the importance of a reliable assessment of such lesions to predict the malignancy and the depth of invasion of the colonic wall emerged. The current unsolved dilemma about the endoscopic excision techniques concerns the necessity of a reliable submucosal invasive cancer assessment system that can stratify the risk of the post-procedural need for surgery. Accordingly, this narrative literature review aims to compare the available diagnostic strategies in predicting malignancy and to give a guide about the best techniques to employ. We performed a literature search using electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library). We collected all articles about endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) registering the outcomes. Moreover, we analyzed all meta-analyses comparing EMR vs ESD outcomes for colorectal sessile or non-polypoid lesions of any size, preoperatively estimated as non-invasive. Seven meta-analysis studies, mainly Eastern, were included in the analysis comparing 124 studies and overall 22954 patients who underwent EMR and ESD procedures. Of these, eighty-two were retrospective, twenty-four perspective, nine case-control, and six cohorts, while three were randomized clinical trials. A total of 18118 EMR and 10379 ESD were completed for a whole of 28497 colorectal sessile or non-polypoid lesions > 5-10 mm in size. In conclusion, it is crucial to enhance the preoperative diagnostic workup, especially in deciding the most suitable endoscopic method for radical resection of flat colorectal lesions at risk of underlying malignancy. Additionally, the ESD necessitates further improvement because of the excessively time-consuming as well as the intraprocedural technical hindrances and related complications. We found a higher rate of en bloc resections and R0 for ESD than EMR for non-pedunculated colorectal lesions. Nevertheless, despite the lower local recurrence rates, ESD had greater perforation rates and needed lengthier procedural times. The prevailing risk for additional surgery in ESD rather than EMR for complications or oncologic reasons is still uncertain.

Endoscopic ablation therapy for gastrointestinal superficial neoplasia

AIM

  In Japan, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have been widely accepted and standardized for the treatment of gastrointestinal superficial neoplasia.

METHODS

  In contrast, mucosal ablation techniques are more common in Western countries and a variety of endoscopic ablation modalities, including argon plasma coagulation (APC), photodynamic therapy (PDT) and lasers, are used.

RESULTS

  Recently developed modalities such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryotherapy are also available for the treatment of superficial lesions such as dysplasia of Barrett's esophagus.

CONCLUSION

  Although we should understand that the completeness of destruction of neoplastic tissue can only be judged at follow up, endoscopic ablation is a viable alternative to endoscopic resection for dysplasia and early-stage malignancies, especially for poor candidates of surgery or endoscopic resection.

Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps

PURPOSE

Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection has been used to treat superficial esophageal and gastric cancers. Efficacy data in the colon are limited. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique in the treatment of sessile polyps and lateral spreading tumors in the colorectum.

METHODS

Two-hundred and fifty-five consecutive patients with sessile polyps or lateral spreading tumors >or=20 mm were treated between January 2000 and December 2007.

RESULTS

A total of 146 sessile polyps and 136 lateral spreading tumors were treated with cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection. Complications occurred in 22 (8.6%) patients (5.5% in sessile polyps and 10.3% in lateral spreading tumors). Intraprocedural bleeding occurred in 21 (7%) of polypectomies (6% in sessile polyps and 10% in lateral spreading tumors); all were controlled endoscopically. Postcoagulation syndrome occurred in 1 patient with lateral spreading tumor. No perforation occurred. Invasive adenocarcinoma was found in 35 patients, of whom 15 underwent surgery. Endoscopic follow-up in 200 patients with 216 adenomas for a median of 12.1 months showed recurrence in 8 (4%) who were treated with resection and/or ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection is an effective treatment for sessile polyps and lateral spreading tumors. A disadvantage of the technique is that the resection is piecemeal. Close surveillance provides the opportunity for additional tissue ablation, when required, to achieve complete lesion removal.

The colorectal malignant polyp: scoping a dilemma

Colorectal adenomas containing invasive carcinoma represent the majority of early colorectal cancers. The malignant polyp carries a significant risk of lympho-haematic metastasis and mortality due to the penetration of cancerous cells into the submucosal layer. The therapeutic dilemma is whether to perform endoscopic or surgical resection. A thorough assessment of the endoscopic, histological and clinical variables is needed to unravel the best treatment for each patient. In particular, a unique staging of such lesions, based on certain histopathological features, has been deeply implicated in the therapeutic choice. Aim of this article is to review the main endoscopic, histological and clinical features of the malignant polyp in order to propose a systematic management of this lesion.

Laser photoablation of colorectal adenomas: a 12-year experience

BACKGROUND

We analyze laser photoablation as an alternative treatment of large sessile polyps in inoperable patients.

METHODS

Ninety-four colorectal polyps (mean diameter 3.09 +/- 2.7 cm, range 1-15 cm) were treated using high-energy lasers (Nd:YAG and diode). Grade of dysplasia was low in 51, high in 35, with focally invasive cancer in eight.

RESULTS

After 405 laser sessions (4.3 per polyp) five procedure-related complications were observed: two strictures, two bleedings, and one perforation. The last needed a surgical resection; the others were successfully treated by endoscopic therapy. Fifty-seven polyps (61%) were completely eradicated and the growth was controlled in all but two (98%). No degeneration was found after 28-month follow-up of treated adenomas with low- or high-grade dysplasia. Outcome of treatment was dependent on the dimension and grade of the dysplasia (p < 0.05), but not on the polyps' position (rectum or colon). Relief of rectal bleeding was obtained in 90%, of mucus discharge in 77%, and of tenesmus in 100% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser photoablation of colonic adenomas can be considered a valid procedure not only to relieve symptoms, but also to control the risk of degeneration in patients unfit for surgery or when surgical treatment is considered excessively invalidating.

EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps

BACKGROUND

EMR optimizes histopathologic assessment of resected lesions. This study evaluated the outcome of EMR of large sessile colorectal polyps in terms of complications and recurrence.

METHODS

An uncontrolled prospective study was conducted of a cohort of 136 patients with sessile colorectal polyps referred for EMR. After submucosal injection, EMR was performed piecemeal by either snare polypectomy alone or with cap aspiration.

RESULTS

In 136 patients, a total of 139 sessile polyps were resected, 86 of which were in the right colon. Median polyps diameter was 20 mm in the right colon and 30 mm in the other colonic segments. Intraprocedure bleeding occurred after 15 polypectomies (10.8%) and was controlled endoscopically in all cases; there was no delayed bleeding. Post-polypectomy syndrome occurred in 5 patients (3.7%). There was no perforation. Invasive carcinoma was found in 17 sessile colorectal polyps, and surgery was performed in 10 of 17 cases. Follow-up colonoscopy in 93 patients without invasive carcinoma (96 polyps), over a median of 12.3 months, disclosed local recurrence of 21 adenomatous polyps (21.9%). Colonoscopic follow-up in 5 of the 7 patients, who had sessile colorectal polyps with invasive carcinoma and did not undergo surgery, disclosed no local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

EMR, including EMR with cap aspiration, is effective and safe for removal of sessile colorectal polyps throughout the colon.

Stents and lasers for colonoscopic lesions

The use of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) in the colon is now becoming more commonplace. These devices can be employed to decompress large bowel that has become obstructed from either benign or malignant disease. Many studies in the past year have validated the use of colonic SEMS to allow preoperative bowel preparation in resectable patients, or as an alternative to surgery in those requiring palliative therapy alone. Laser therapy has also gained new ground in recent months because it has been shown to help in recanulation of obstructed bowel to aid in SEMS placement. In addition, laser therapy alone can be used to treat some colonic lesions that had formerly been treated surgically.