Interest of immunomodulation as a mean to improve the preparation of polyclonal and monoclonal antibody reagents

Characterization of the Streptococcus mutans P1 epitope recognized by immunomodulatory monoclonal antibody 6-11A

Monoclonal antibody (MAb) 6-11A directed against Streptococcus mutans surface adhesin P1 was shown previously to influence the mucosal immunogenicity of this organism in BALB/c mice. The specificity of anti-P1 serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and secretory IgA antibodies and the subclass distribution of anti-P1 serum IgG antibodies were altered, and the ability of elicited serum antibodies to inhibit S. mutans adherence in vitro was in certain cases increased. MAb 6-11A is known to recognize an epitope dependent on the presence of the proline-rich region of the protein, although it does not bind directly to the isolated P-region domain. In this report, we show that MAb 6-11A recognizes a complex discontinuous epitope that requires the simultaneous presence of the alanine-rich repeat domain (A-region) and the P-region. Formation of the core epitope requires the interaction of these segments of P1. Residues amino terminal to the A-region also contributed to recognition by MAb 6-11A but were not essential for binding. Characterization of the MAb 6-11A epitope will enable insight into potential mechanisms of immunomodulation and broaden our understanding of the tertiary structure of P1.

Further characterization of immunomodulation by a monoclonal antibody against Streptococcus mutans antigen P1

We demonstrated previously that mucosal immunization of mice with Streptococcus mutans coated with the monoclonal antibody (MAb) 6-11A directed against the major surface adhesin protein P1 results in changes in the amount, isotype distribution, and specificity of serum antibodies compared with animals immunized with bacteria only. We now show that the specificity of the mucosal secretory IgA response was also influenced by this MAb. Changes in antibody specificity were associated with changes in biological activity. Serum samples which differed in antibody reactivity with P1 polypeptides generated by partial digestion with N-chlorosuccinimide but not in isotype distribution or overall reactivity with S. mutans or intact P1 demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the ability to inhibit bacterial adherence to salivary-agglutinin-coated hydroxyapatite beads. Serum IgG antibodies against P1 from mice immunized with either S. mutans alone or S. mutans coated with 6-11A were shown to recognize antigenic determinants dependent on the presence of the central proline-rich repeat domain, a segment necessary for the structural integrity of the molecule. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in antibody reactivity with a panel of six partial P1 polypeptides encoded by overlapping spaP subclones, suggesting that the targets of biologically relevant antibodies involve complex epitopes not reconstituted by the recombinant products tested. Lastly, we show that binding of MAb 6-11A to P1 on the surface of S. mutans alters P1's susceptibility to proteolytic digestion. Hence, changes in antigen processing and presentation may contribute to the immunomodulatory effects of this MAb.

The effect of monoclonal antibody and route of immunization on the humoral immune response againstPorphyromonas gingivalis

Immunomodulation mediated by exogenous antibodies has been proposed as a vaccine strategy to improve immune protection against pathogenic microorganisms and suggested to contribute to protection following passive immunization. To test whether a monoclonal antibody directed against an adhesion epitope of the periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis could influence the humoral immune response following mucosal immunization, BALB/c mice were immunized orally or intranasally with P. gingivalis alone or P. gingivalis coated with monoclonal antibody 61BG1.3. Differences in antigenic specificity of anti- P. gingivalis serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) were demonstrated between groups of mice that received monoclonal antibody-coated P. gingivalis versus those that received P. gingivalis alone by either route of immunization. Binding of monoclonal antibody 61BG1.3 to P. gingivalis prior to immunization did not influence the serum IgG subclass distribution. However, minor differences in subclass distribution were observed between the various routes of mucosal immunization. These results support the hypothesis that specific monoclonal antibody bound to a bacterial vaccine can alter the quality of the humoral immune response to that organism.

Monoclonal antibody-mediated modulation of the humoral immune response against mucosally applied Streptococcus mutans

Systemic immunization with antigen coupled to monoclonal antibody (MAb) has been used by several investigators to increase the number of MAb-producing hybridomas against an antigen and to elicit antibodies specific for poorly immunogenic epitopes. This strategy has implications for vaccine design in that protective immunity is not necessarily directed at immunodominant epitopes of pathogens and may be improved by deliberately shifting the immune response toward subdominant epitopes. To our knowledge, no studies to date have addressed the potential for immunomodulatory activity mediated by MAbs bound to mucosally applied antigen. To test whether administration of an exogenous MAb directed against a streptococcal surface protein could influence the humoral immune response, BALB/c mice were immunized orally by gastric intubation or intranasally with Streptococcus mutans alone or S. mutans complexed with a MAb directed against the major surface protein P1. Significant changes in the subclass distribution, as well as the specificity, of anti-P1 serum immunoglobulin G antibodies were demonstrated in groups of mice which received S. mutans coated with the anti-P1 MAb versus those which received S. mutans alone. Alterations in the humoral immune response were dependent on the amount of anti-P1 MAb used to coat the bacteria. In addition, differences in the anti-P1 immune responses were observed between groups of mice immunized via oral versus intranasal routes. In summary, an exogenous MAb complexed with a streptococcal antigen prior to mucosal immunization can influence the immunoglobulin isotype and specificity of the host humoral immune response against the antigen.