A pilot study of combination therapy with indinavir, stavudine (d4T), and didanosine (ddI) in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus

Post-HAART outcomes in pediatric populations: comparison of resource-limited and developed countries

CONTEXT

No formal comparison has been made between the pediatric post-highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) outcomes of resource-limited and developed countries.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically quantify and compare major baseline characteristics and clinical end points after HAART between resource-limited and developed settings.

METHODS

Published articles and abstracts (International AIDS Society 2009, Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections 2010) were examined from inception (first available publication for each search engine) to March 2010. Publications that contained data on post-HAART mortality, weight-for-age z score (WAZ), CD4 count, or viral load (VL) changes in pediatric populations were reviewed. Selected studies met the following criteria: (1) patients were younger than 21 years; (2) HAART was given (≥ 3 antiretroviral medications); and (3) there were >20 patients. Data were extracted for baseline age, CD4 count, VL, WAZ, and mortality, CD4 and virologic suppression over time. Studies were categorized as having been performed in a resource-limited country (RLC) or developed country (DC) on the basis of the United Nations designation. Mean percentage of deaths per cohort and deaths per 100 child-years, baseline CD4 count, VL, WAZ, and age were calculated for RLCs and DCs and compared by using independent samples t tests.

RESULTS

Forty RLC and 28 DC publications were selected (N = 17 875 RLCs; N = 1835 DC). Mean percentage of deaths per cohort and mean deaths per 100 child-years after HAART were significantly higher in RLCs than DCs (7.6 vs 1.6, P < .001, and 8.0 vs 0.9, P < .001, respectively). Mean baseline CD4% was 12% in RLCs and 23% in DCs (P = .01). Mean baseline VLs were 5.5 vs 4.7 log(10) copies per mL in RLCs versus DCs (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline CD4% and VL differ markedly between DCs and RLCs, as does mortality after pediatric HAART. Earlier diagnosis and treatment of pediatric HIV in RLCs would be expected to result in better HAART outcomes.

Addison's disease and severe encephalopathy in an infant with HIV infection

AIM

To discuss the overlapping clinical spectrum of encephalopathy due to Addison's disease and HIV infection.

PATIENT

We report a 2.5-year-old boy from Uzbekistan with recurrent episodes of encephalopathy and seizures, triggered by infection or vaccinations, in whom adrenal insufficiency and infection with HIV and HCV was diagnosed. Presumably, Addisonian crises prompted hypovolemic shock and blood transfusions, which were responsible for horizontal HIV infection. The combination of adrenal insufficiency and HIV infection eventually led to progressive severe encephalopathy. Despite highly active antiretroviral therapy (which led to substantial reduction of blood viral load), the neurological condition did not improve.

DISCUSSION

The interactions of Addison's disease and HIV in the pathogenesis of encephalopathy are discussed.

Long-term effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy on CD4+ cell evolution among children and adolescents infected with HIV: 5 years and counting

BACKGROUND

Lower percentages of CD4(+) T lymphocytes are associated with adverse clinical outcomes among children and adolescents infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). CD4(+) lymphocyte percentage generally increases with receipt of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), but long-term follow-up is required to assess whether these increases in CD4(+) cell percentage are maintained and whether they lead to normal CD4(+) cell percentages in children with severe immunosuppression.

METHODS

The study population included 1236 children and adolescents perinatally infected with HIV who were enrolled in a US-based multicenter prospective cohort study (Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 219/219C) and who were not receiving HAART at study initiation. We estimated the effects of HAART, HAART with protease inhibitors, and HAART with nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors on CD4(+) cell percentage, using marginal structural models to account for confounding by severity.

RESULTS

Initiation of any type of HAART increased CD4(+) cell percentage by 2.34% (95% confidence interval, 1.35%-3.33%) in the first year, relative to noninitiation of HAART. The substantial increases in CD4(+) cell percentage observed after the first year of experience with these combination therapies were followed by relatively smaller increases that continued for 5 years after initiation. Although larger increases in CD4(+) cell percentage were observed among children with a greater degree of immunosuppression at baseline, the mean CD4(+) cell percentage after 5 years of HAART did not reach normal levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the initiation of HAART in children before severe immunosuppression occurs for long-term maintenance of normal CD4(+) cell percentages. This beneficial result must be weighed against the evidence of potential adverse events associated with the prolonged use of such therapy.

Nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in children

By the end of 2006, approximately 2.3 million children worldwide were living with HIV infection, representing about 15% of all HIV-infected individuals but only 5-7% of the total population of treated patients worldwide. Despite a general increase in the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited settings, appropriate care and ART remain inaccessible for most of the world's HIV-infected children. ART of children is challenging because of a general lack of paediatric formulations (including tablets in paediatric strengths), limited options of drugs available for children (some have been approved only for use in adults), different viral and immunological responses, dependency on caregivers for administration of the therapy, and specific issues of toxicity in long-term therapy related to maturation and development. As in adults, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are a key component of any ART schedule in children, being the recommended 'backbone' treatment in US, European and WHO guidelines, and, indeed, NRTIs have been extensively studied in children. NRTIs are the class of antiretroviral drugs that have more drugs licensed for paediatric use and more paediatric formulations.Generally, the dual NRTI backbone treatment of combination with a non-NRTI (NNRTI) or protease inhibitor (PI) should comprise a cytidine analogue (lamivudine, emtricitabine) and a thymidine analogue (stavudine, zidovudine), guanosine analogue (i.e. abacavir), or nucleotide RTI (NtRTI; i.e. tenofovir). European and US guidelines recommend the use of triple NRTI therapy (abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine) in children with anticipated poor adherence to other treatment regimens because of tablet burden. In conclusion, while use of ART in children needs to be dramatically increased, selecting and administering the best drug combination for children is still limited by a lack of paediatric formulations and knowledge of drug metabolism, safety and efficacy in children. NRTIs are already a key component of paediatric ART, but fixed-dose combinations and specific research in children are needed to optimise their use. In this article we review the available information to facilitate selection of the best NRTI for backbone treatment in combination ART for HIV-infected children.

Indinavir/ritonavir remains an important component of HAART for the treatment of HIV/AIDS, particularly in resource-limited settings

For over a decade, indinavir has been approved for the treatment of HIV/AIDS; however, following the introduction of new protease inhibitors (PIs) with improved safety and pharmacologic profiles, its use in developed countries has become almost obsolete. In contrast, in resource-limited settings where the majority of people living with HIV/AIDS reside, indinavir is part of the most affordable PI-based highly active antiretroviral treatment regimen. A major drawback of indinavir use is renal toxicity, but low-dose indinavir plus ritonavir (400/100 mg) twice daily is both efficacious and tolerable. Similar low dosing levels in children have also proven successful, but data in pregnant women remains limited. Due to its low cost and proven efficacy indinavir remains a key component of HIV/AIDS treatment in resource-limited settings.

The Pediatric AIDS Severity Score (PASS): a multidimensional AIDS-severity adjustment for pediatric HIV infection

BACKGROUND

A severity staging system predictive of mortality for perinatally HIV-infected children is needed for clinical and research purposes.

METHODS

A pediatric AIDS severity score (PASS) was developed using baseline sociodemographic, clinical, immunologic, and functional measures obtained from 786 perinatally HIV-infected children enrolled into a prospective cohort study (PACTG 219) in the pre-highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era (pre-1996). PASS was then validated among 392 perinatally HIV-infected children randomly sampled from the original source population (n = 1178). Survival estimates and hazard ratios (HRs) were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method and proportional hazards models, respectively. The most predictive models were determined using Harrell's "C" statistic.

RESULTS

Overall survival was 95% and 90% at 1 and 2 years of follow-up, respectively. The most comprehensive model for predicting mortality, termed the "Full" PASS, included CD4% <15 (HR = 3.9), CDC category C (HR = 2.6), BMI <10% (HR = 2.4), a low (<70) neuropsychological score (HR = 2.6), a general health rating <5 (HR = 2.4), and an elevated symptoms score (HR = 1.9). These determinants were highly predictive of mortality (C statistic = 0.841).

CONCLUSIONS

PASS will be helpful in assessing the effectiveness of ART among children with HIV infection, particularly when randomized clinical trials are not possible due to ethical and feasibility concerns.

Long-term experience with combination antiretroviral therapy that contains nelfinavir for up to 7 years in a pediatric cohort

OBJECTIVE

We sought to provide long-term data on the clinical, immunologic, and virologic response to highly active antiretroviral therapy in infants and children who are naive to protease inhibitors.

METHODS

HIV-1-infected children who were naive to protease inhibitors were treated with a combination of nelfinavir and 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (stavudine and lamivudine) in an observational, prospective, single-center study. Virologic failure-free survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analyses. The increase in CD4+ T cells during follow-up was estimated with a generalized linear model incorporating repeated measurements.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine HIV-1-infected children were included and followed for a median period of 227 weeks (interquartile range: 108-275 weeks). The virologic failure-free survival rate was 74%, 66%, 58%, and 54% after 48, 96, 144, and 240 weeks, respectively. Children who experienced virologic failure in 48 weeks (or 96 weeks) were younger at baseline compared with the responders (0.8 vs 5.3 years). Eighteen children remained on the regimen for >5 years. All children, including the nonresponders, showed a sustained immunologic response. Grades 3 to 4 toxicity was observed in 2 patients only. Eleven developed clinically evident lipodystrophy.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy can be used safely in infants and children over a long period. Young age is strongly associated with virologic failure. Although the virologic response declined, immunologic parameters and clinical improvement were sustained up to 7 years, at the expense of lipodystrophy.

Pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected children

The initiation of antiretroviral therapy has resulted in an impressive reduction in the rate of disease progression in AIDS and HIV-1-related deaths in children; however, there are still several major challenges to be faced in order to improve therapy. A major topic that needs to be dealt with is the establishment of the optimal dosage of antiretroviral therapy for children. This review presents the currently available peer-reviewed data on the pharmacokinetics of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs) and fusion inhibitors (FIs) in children. In addition, the data are discussed in relation to the currently available European and US guidelines and the US FDA-approved drug labels. High intra- and interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics are often observed for all antiretroviral drugs. The number of children included in the pharmacokinetic studies is often small and children are often divided into divergent groups using different dosage levels and/or drug formulations. For a substantial number of antiretroviral drugs, dosage recommendations, especially for young children, are still absent in the European and US guidelines. The recommended drug dosages in the guidelines are often different from that in the officially approved drug product label. In addition, the recommended drug dosages may deviate between the European and US guidelines. Thus, while practioners aim to meet the recommendations in the official guidelines, patients may receive highly divergent dosages of medication. The high intra- and interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs in children hampers the application of fixed dosages of antiretroviral drugs. For PIs and NNRTIs, plasma drug levels correlate with viral suppression and drug toxicity. NRTIs are prodrugs that are intracellularly converted to their active triphosphate form and, therefore, plasma NRTI levels correlate poorly with viral suppression. Therapeutic drug monitoring of PIs and NNRTIs should be considered to optimise HIV therapy in children.

Single-dose safety and pharmacokinetics of amprenavir (141W94), a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitor, in HIV-infected children

A phase I, open-label, dose-escalating trial was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single, oral doses of amprenavir (141W94), a potent inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease, in 20 HIV-infected children 4 to 12 years of age. The doses of amprenavir evaluated, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mg/kg of body weight, were comparable to those evaluated in adult phase I and II studies. The most common clinical adverse event associated with amprenavir, administered as soft gelatin capsules, was nausea. Amprenavir was rapidly absorbed, with a mean time to maximum concentration (T(max)) occurring 0.95 to 1.58 h after dosing. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0)(-->)(infinity)) was dose proportional, and the mean maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) increased linearly in a less than dose-proportional manner. Amprenavir was eliminated relatively slowly, with a mean terminal-phase half-life (t(1/2)) of 6.17 to 8.28 h. The t(1/2), apparent total clearance, and apparent volume of distribution during the elimination phase were dose independent. Considerable interpatient variability was seen for all pharmacokinetic parameters of amprenavir. The results of this study suggest that 20 mg of amprenavir/kg administered twice a day should be used in future pediatric studies.

Triple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy in children

Much of the success attributed to HIV therapy in the last few years has resulted from improved ways of using existing drugs in combination therapy regimens. The availability of new, more potent drugs such as protease inhibitors and more accurate viral load tests to aid decisions to start or change treatment has also contributed to the success. Published recommendations for pediatric HIV therapy, generated by a panel of experts and specialists, are readily available and regularly updated. Preferred regimens of 'potent' therapy (referred to as highly active antiretroviral therapy, or HAART) currently consist of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) combined with either a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or a protease inhibitor. More intense four-drug regimens using an NNRTI or a second protease inhibitor as a fourth drug are being evaluated. Problems with HAART include: unpalatable drug formulations and adverse effects, coupled with lack of data on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of various drug combinations. Adherence is a major factor influencing the efficacy and outcome of antiretroviral therapy. Many children cannot adhere to complex multidrug regimens, which cause virologic failure, despite excellent CD4+ cell count responses. This means a rapid progression through the limited number of treatment regimens available. Simpler regimens such as those containing three NRTIs have been proposed as a method of treatment that will allow suppression of the virus, yet circumvent many of the problems previously mentioned. An additional benefit would be the preservation of antiretroviral drugs from other classes for future treatment options if required. The major advantages of triple NRTI regimens are the simplicity of the regimen, good tolerability, few drug-drug interactions, and infrequent adverse effects coupled with a low pill burden. However, abacavir hypersensitivity remains a major problem. Up to 3% of patients may develop an early idiosyncratic hypersensitivity reaction - fever, malaise, and mucositis with or without rash, which can progress to more advanced stages of shock and death. A major concern is the apparently inferior virologic control of triple NRTI therapy as demonstrated in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5095 study with zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir (Trizivir) combination in adults. Such a combination should only be considered in special situations. Examples cited include informed patient choice based on anticipated poor adherence on other treatment regimens, or if concomitant drugs such as tuberculosis medication are prescribed. The low pill burden of triple NRTI regimens (especially if combined in a single pill such as Trizivir), offers hope that regimen simplification may still be possible in the future.

Salvage lopinavir-ritonavir therapy in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children

OBJECTIVE

To study the control of viral replication in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children on different salvage therapies.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective observational study in 120 HIV-infected children was conducted. The children were divided into 3 groups according to their salvage therapies: (1) children receiving first line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART); (2) protease inhibitor-experienced children receiving second line HAART; (3) protease inhibitor-experienced children receiving HAART including lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r). The outcome variables examined were time to achieve viral load (VL) < or =400 copies/mL, success in achieving VL < or =400 copies/mL and time to virologic failure (VL >400 copies/mL).

METHODS

VL (HIV-RNA copies/mL) was quantified with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction molecular assay. For each protocol, survival analyses were conducted to determine the probability of achieving VL < or =400 copies/mL and rebound of VL.

RESULTS

VL < or =400 copies/mL was achieved by 52.4% of children receiving first line HAART, 48.3% receiving second line HAART and 71.5% receiving HAART including LPV/r. Children receiving HAART including LPV/r reached VL < or =400 copies/mL in a shorter time than children receiving second line HAART (P = 0.017), but quite similar to children receiving first line HAART. In terms of adjusted relative risk, children receiving HAART including LPV/r were 3.36 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.59, 7.07] more likely to achieve VL < or =400 copies/mL than children receiving a different second line HAART. VL rebound occurred in 68.2% children receiving first line HAART, 73.4% receiving second line HAART and 32.4% receiving HAART including LPV/r. Children receiving HAART that includes LPV/r has less incidence of VL rebound (P=0.013) and 3.29 (95% CI 1.04, 10.3) times less risk to achieve a VL rebound than children receiving a different second line HAART.

CONCLUSIONS

HAART that includes LPV/r is able to control HIV replication more efficiently than other classic salvage antiretroviral therapies.

Pharmacokinetics of indinavir combined with low-dose ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children

So far, no pediatric doses for indinavir combined with ritonavir have been defined. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of 400 mg of indinavir/m(2) combined with 125 mg of ritonavir/m(2) every 12 h (q12h) in 14 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children. The area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h and the minimum concentration of drug in serum for indinavir were similar to those for 800 mg of indinavir-100 mg of ritonavir q12h in adults, while the maximum concentration of drug in serum was slightly decreased, with geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals in parentheses) of 1.1 (0.87 to 1.3), 0.96 (0.60 to 1.5), and 0.80 (0.68 to 0.94), respectively.

Long-term effects of protease-inhibitor-based combination therapy on CD4 T-cell recovery in HIV-1-infected children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence about longer-term effects of combination antiretroviral therapy that includes protease inhibitors (PIs) on the immunological status of HIV-1-infected children. Better understanding might help to resolve questions on when to initiate treatment.

METHODS

The change in percentage of CD4-positive T lymphocytes (CD4%) was investigated in 1012 previously treated HIV-1-infected children (aged 0-17 years) who were enrolled in research clinics in the USA before 1996 and followed up to 2000. 702 started PI-based combination therapy. Data analyses ignored subsequent treatment changes.

FINDINGS

Among the 1012 children, the median CD4% increased from 22% to 28% between 1996, when PIs were first prescribed, and 2000. For the 702 who started PI-based therapy, the mean CD4% increase after 3 years was largest among participants with the greatest immunosuppression (15.7%, 10.6%, 5.1%, and 2.0% for participants with CD4% before therapy of <5%, 5-14%, 15-24%, and >25%; p<0.0001). After adjustment for pre-PI CD4%, the mean increase was largest among the youngest participants (9.2%, 8.0%, and 4.3% for ages <5 years, 5-9 years, and >10 years; p=0.001). However, only a minority of significantly immunocompromised participants (33%, 26%, and 49% of those with pre-PI CD4% of <5%, 5-14%, or 15-24%) achieved CD4% values above 25%, whereas 84% of those with pre-PI values above 25% maintained such values.

INTERPRETATION

Although PI-based therapy was associated with substantial improvements in CD4%, initiation before severe immunosuppression and at younger ages may be more effective for recovery or maintenance of normal CD4%. Randomised investigation of when to start combination therapy in children, particularly infants, is needed.

The role of protease inhibitor therapy in children with HIV infection

In comparison with HIV infection in adults, higher HIV RNA levels in children with perinatal HIV infection, differences in the natural history of HIV disease progression, and the presence of a relatively immature immune system contribute to the more complex and problematic nature of pediatric antiretroviral therapy. Current US treatment guidelines for pediatric HIV infection advocate aggressive therapy with potent combination antiretroviral regimens, to achieve profound and durable suppression of viral replication and preservation of immune function. The combination of a protease inhibitor (PI) and dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is the most commonly recommended form of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART). However, use of PI therapy in pediatrics has been constrained by the lack of suitable drug formulations, a paucity of pharmacokinetic and safety data, and drug intolerance. Pharmacokinetic studies of PIs demonstrate frequent differences between children and adults, and greater variability among children, which has led to subtherapeutic dosage regimens and the development of viral resistance. The optimal dosage of many PIs in younger children is not yet known. A therapeutically important drug interaction associated with PIs is that occurring between the various PIs themselves, which allows lower doses of PI at less frequent intervals. Dual PI regimens will probably become more common, as they permit a simpler antiretroviral regimen, lower pill/medication burden, fewer adverse effects and improved adherence. Poor adherence to antiretroviral therapy remains the greatest barrier to overall success in the treatment of HIV-infected children. The key to improving adherence in HIV-infected children is to find treatment regimens that are better suited to their normal life. With improvements in existing PIs and the development of newer ones, simplification of current antiretroviral therapy to once-daily regimens without loss of potency should be achievable. PI-containing HAART has transformed HIV infection into a chronic illness, and HIV-infected children now live longer.

Esophageal candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected pediatric patients after the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate epidemiologic trends, clinical features and outcome of esophageal candidiasis in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy in a prospectively monitored population of HIV-infected children and adolescents followed at the National Cancer Institute.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The records of all HIV-infected pediatric patients (n = 266) followed between 1995 and 2000 were reviewed for a history of esophageal candidiasis. Proven esophageal candidiasis was defined as clinical plus radiographic and/or endoscopic findings of esophageal candidiasis. Probable esophageal candidiasis was defined as esophageal symptoms that responded promptly to appropriate antifungal therapy. The medical records of all patients fulfilling these criteria were reviewed for demographic, clinical and laboratory features at presentation, as well as therapeutic interventions and outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 266 patients 9 (3.4%) had 18 documented episodes of proven (n = 16) or probable (n = 2) esophageal candidiasis. A history of prior mucosal candidiasis was present in 94% of all episodes. The median CD4+ count at the time of diagnosis was 7/microl (range, 0 to 550), and the median viral load was 98000 copies/ml (range, 22916 to 1278933). Concurrent oropharyngeal candidiasis was the most common clinical presentation (72%) followed by fever (55%), odynophagia (50%) and nausea or vomiting (39%). Treatment consisted of antifungal triazoles (61%) or amphotericin B (39%). Clinical cure was achieved in 15 cases, including all patients receiving triazoles.

CONCLUSION

Esophageal candidiasis persists in the subgroup of patients not responding to highly active antiretroviral therapy and in that setting may present without concomitant oropharyngeal candidiasis or typical clinical symptoms, thus underscoring the need for a high index of suspicion in children with very low CD4+ counts.

Impact of Stavudine Phenotype and Thymidine Analogues Mutations on Viral Response to Stavudine plus Lamivudine in Altis 2 Anrs Trial

Objective

Stavudine-based antiretroviral combinations are less effective in zidovudine-experienced patients than in naive subjects and recently, mutations have been described to be associated to the use of both stavudine and zidovudine. In the ALTIS 2 trial, it was shown that a combination of stavudine and lamivudine is less effective in zidovudine-experienced patients than in naive patients. We conducted a retrospective genotypic and phenotypic resistance study (expressed as stavudine phenotypic index, calculated by dividing the inhibitory concentrations 50% [IC50] by the mean value of the sensitive viruses) to evaluate the factors associated with decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA.

Design

Associations with continuous variables were studied using non-parametric Spearman correlation coefficients. Associations with categorical variables were studied using non-parametric Mann–Whitney tests. Multivariate stepwise regression analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors of the virological response.

Results

At baseline, most of the subjects harboured zidovudine-associated mutations in plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Zidovudine and stavudine IC50 and IC90 were strongly associated with response. It appears that a cut-off of stavudine phenotypic index of 1.8-fold of IC50, much lower than the usually used value, could be clinically significant for response to stavudine. In the multivariate analysis, the stepwise model with the higher multiple correlation coefficient ( R2=0.742) included the presence of a 215 Y/F mutation, the number of previously used nucleoside analogues and a resistant stavudine phenotype.

Conclusion

These results argue for a phenotypic and genotypic cross resistance between stavudine and zidovudine. Modest increases of IC50 and IC90 for stavudine had an important impact on the virological response during the trial and plead for a new definition of the threshold value for stavudine phenotypic index.

Results of 2 years of treatment with protease-inhibitor--containing antiretroviral therapy in dutch children infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1

Clinical, virologic, and immunologic responses to treatment that contained either indinavir or nelfinavir (both regimens included zidovudine and lamivudine) were determined in 32 children infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) who participated for >/= 96 weeks in a prospective, open, uncontrolled multicenter trial. The pharmacokinetics of indinavir and of nelfinavir were determined and showed large interindividual differences. After 96 weeks of therapy, 69% and 50% of the patients had an HIV-1 RNA load that was below the HIV assays' detection limits of 500 and 40 copies/mL, respectively. Virologic failure was associated with poor compliance and younger age (independent of baseline virus load and receipt of pretreatment). Relative CD4 cell counts increased significantly in relation to the median of the age-specific reference value, from a median of 44% at baseline to 94% after 96 weeks. In a high percentage of the children, clinical, virologic, and immunologic response rates to combination therapy were optimal during the initial 2 years of therapy.

Nucleoside-analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitors plus nevirapine, nelfinavir, or ritonavir for pretreated children infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1

The relative potency and tolerability of multidrug regimens used to treat infants and children infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) are largely unknown. In Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (PACTG) Protocol 377, 181 infants and children were assigned to receive stavudine (d4T) plus nevirapine (NVP) and ritonavir (RTV); d4T plus lamivudine (3TC) and nelfinavir (NFV); d4T plus NVP and NFV; or d4T plus 3TC, NVP, and NFV. Eleven additional children received d4T and NVP plus NFV given twice daily. All subjects had not previously received protease inhibitors or nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors and all had been immunologically stable while receiving reverse-transcriptase inhibitor therapy. After 48 weeks of therapy, 17 (41%) of 41 subjects receiving d4T-NVP-RTV, 13 (30%) of 44 receiving d4T-NVP-NFV, 21 (42%) of 50 receiving d4T-3TC and NFV (3 times daily), and 22 (52%) of 42 receiving d4T-3TC-NVP-NFV were still receiving their assigned therapy and had HIV-1 RNA suppression to </= 400 copies/mL. These regimens were similar in their drug activity, but the 4-drug regimen offered slightly more durable suppression of viremia.

Efficacy of highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infected children

Although the reduction in HIV-1-related deaths with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is similar in adults and children, the extent of the changes in two important surrogate markers HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4+ T cell counts, differs widely. In most paediatric studies virological response rates to HAART are inferior to those in adults. This review provides an overview of the paediatric clinical studies using HAART and seeks to improve the understanding of factors that may contribute to success or failure of HAART in children. An overview of all current articles on paediatric clinical trials using HAART is provided. 23 papers were available. HIV-1 RNA loads and CD4+ T cell counts were used as primary outcome measures. Virological response rates were highly variable, both among the different antiretroviral drugs but also among different studies using the same medication. Four studies in which dosages of the administrated protease inhibitor (PI) were adjusted after pharmacokinetic evaluation had superior virological response rates compared with those in which fixed dosages were used. Immunological response rates were more uniform than virological responses. In almost all studies increases of CD4+ T cell counts are reported independent of the extent of the virological response. Side-effects of HAART were generally mild, transient, and of gastrointestinal origin. Significant percentages of patients with serum lipid abnormalities were reported in three paediatric studies. However, signs of clinical lipodystrophy were not observed. The inferior virological response rates, which have been reported in HIV-1 infected children treated with HAART form a reflection of the challenges that are encountered in the treatment of these children. Difficulties with adherence and with the pharmacokinetics of PIs in children require an intensive, child-adjusted approach. A practical approach to therapy in institutions without tertiary care facilities may be induction therapy with a lopinavir containing regimen (lacking a need for therapeutic drug monitoring), to reduce high viral load levels followed by an easily tolerated maintenance regimen, for example containing abacavir or nevirapine.

Efficacy and safety of stavudine plus didanosine in asymptomatic HIV-infected children with plasma HIV RNA below 50,000 copies per milliliter

BACKGROUND

Simple antiretroviral drug combinations might provide a comparable benefit to standard triple regimens in patients with mild HIV disease, because poor adherence and toxicities often compromise the sustained benefit of the latest triple regimens, especially when protease inhibitors are used. Bad adherence is the main cause of virological failure in HIV-positive children. The activity and safety of a double combination of nucleosides with high genetic barrier for resistance (stavudine plus didanosine) was assessed in children with nonadvanced HIV disease.

METHOD

From February 1998 to March 1999, 16 children were enrolled in six Spanish hospitals in a trial in which didanosine (180 mg/m2/day) and stavudine (2 mg/Kg/day) were administered for 48 weeks to asymptomatic naive children with plasma HIV RNA below 50,000 copies/mL and CD4 counts above 15%. Genotypic resistance to nucleoside analogues was examined at baseline and at the end of the study.

RESULTS

At baseline, median age was 6.5 years (range, 2-14). The absolute and percentage mean CD4 counts were 864 and 32%, respectively (z score: -0.48 and -1.1). Mean plasma viral load was 4.05 log. No clinical events occurred during the 1-year study period. Minor side effects were recorded in two thirds of children, although none led to drug discontinuation. Lipoatrophy was not recognized in any of the participants. Plasma HIV RNA below 400 copies/mL was reached by 43% and 44% of patients at 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. The z score for absolute and percentage CD4 count increased significantly at 48 weeks (+0.63 and +0.97, respectively) in respect to baseline (p <.05). Resistance mutations linked to didanosine (L74V or M184V) or stavudine (V75T) were not recognized and neither were multinucleoside resistant genotypes (151 complex or 69 inserts). However, four children developed AZT-like mutations T215Y and/or M41L.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with a dual combination of didanosine plus stavudine in naive children with nonadvanced HIV disease is safe and provides a satisfactory virological outcome at 1 year. Toxicity and drug resistance seem to occur rarely when this combination is used, which allows good adherence and spares other future treatment options.

Combination therapy with saquinavir soft gelatin capsules in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, tolerance, safety and antiviral activity of the HIV protease inhibitor, saquinavir, formulated as soft gelatin capsules (SQV-SGC), given in combination with nucleoside antiretroviral agents (NRTIs) with or without nelfinavir in HIV-infected children.

METHODS

This was an open label study of HIV-infected children ages 3 to 16 years, conducted in two parts. In Part 1 of the study 14 children were treated orally with SQV-SGC (initially given in three 33-mg/kg doses daily; dosage adjusted to 50 mg/kg three times daily based on initial pharmacokinetics) and two NRTIs. Addition of nelfinavir was permitted for children who did not achieve a predetermined steady state target plasma saquinavir exposure. In Part 2 a new group of 13 children received SQV-SGC (33 mg/kg three times daily) in combination with nelfinavir and one or two NRTIs. Pharmacokinetics were assessed after the first dose and 4 weeks into treatment (steady state). Patients were treated for 72 and 48 weeks in Parts 1 and 2, respectively.

RESULTS

Most adverse events were mild; the most commonly reported were diarrhea, abdominal discomfort and headache. Two children were withdrawn from the study because of adverse events (one each of nausea and dysphagia) related to the study treatment. There were no deaths or serious adverse events attributed to the study medication. Steady state saquinavir area under the plasma concentration vs. time curves (AUC24) were 6,210 and 11,010 ng/h/ml for Parts 1 and 2, respectively. Compared with baseline measurements median changes in plasma HIV RNA concentrations were -2.12 log10 copies/ml [5 of 14 (36%) with HIV RNA <50 copies/ml) (Week 72)] and -2.58 log10 copies/ml [8 of 13 (62%) <50 copies/ml) (Week 48)] in Parts 1 and 2, respectively. The median changes in CD4+ lymphocyte count were +292 and +154 cells/microl for Parts 1 and 2, respectively. Genotypic resistance assays revealed a low frequency of saquinavir-associated resistance mutations after 48 weeks of therapy, with only 2 of 27 children having substitutions at positions 48V and/or 90M.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with SQV-SGC was well-tolerated and safe in HIV-infected children, and antiviral activity was observed. Saquinavir plasma concentrations were lower than expected, particularly for Part 1 (SQV-SGC plus NRTIs), but addition of nelfinavir increased saquinavir exposures.

Pharmacokinetics of the protease inhibitor indinavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of indinavir in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children as part of a prospective, open, uncontrolled, multicenter study in The Netherlands. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children were monitored over 6 months of treatment with zidovudine (120 mg/m(2) every 8 h [q8h]), lamivudine (4 mg/kg of body weight q12h), and indinavir (33mg/kg of metabolic weight [MW] q8h). Four weeks after the start of treatment, the steady-state pharmacokinetics of indinavir were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. If patients had an indinavir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of below 10 or above 30 mg/liter. h, a dose increase or a dose reduction was made and pharmacokinetic measurements were repeated 4 weeks later. Nineteen patients started with the dose of 33 mg/kg of MW q8h. The median AUC (range) was 10.5 (2.8 to 51.0) mg/liter. h. The median AUC (range) in 17 children treated with 50 mg/kg of MW q8h was 20.6 (4.1 to 38.7) mg/liter. h. Finally, five patients had a dose increase to 67 mg/kg of MW q8h, resulting in a median AUC (range) of 36.6 (27.2 to 80.0) mg/liter. h. After 6 months of treatment, there were 11 children with an AUC of below 20 mg/liter. h, of whom 5 (45%) had a detectable viral load, while this was the case in none of the 11 children with an AUC of higher than 20 mg/liter. h. We conclude that the optimal dose of indinavir in children to obtain drug exposure similar to that observed in adult patients is 50 mg/kg of MW q8h, which approximates 600 mg/m(2) q8h. It would even be better to adjust the indinavir dose based on an AUC of greater than 20 mg/liter. h.

Comparison of twice-daily stavudine plus once- or twice-daily didanosine and nevirapine in early stages of HIV infection: the scan study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of once-daily didanosine and nevirapine plus twice-daily stavudine versus twice-daily administration of all three drugs.

METHODS

This open-label, randomized, multicentre study enrolled 94 antiretroviral-naive patients with chronic HIV infection, CD4+ cell counts > 500 x 10(6) cells/l, and viral loads > 5000 copies/ml. Patients were treated with either 40 mg stavudine (twice daily) plus 400 mg didanosine (once daily) and 400 mg nevirapine (once daily) or 40 mg stavudine (twice daily) plus 200 mg didanosine (twice daily) and 200 mg nevirapine (twice daily).

RESULTS

After 12 months, 68% of patients who received twice-daily didanosine and nevirapine had viral loads < 200 copies/ml in the intention-to-treat and 79% in the on-treatment analysis, respectively. The corresponding values for patients treated with didanosine and nevirapine, taken once-daily, were 73 and 85%. The percentages of patients in each group with viral loads < 5 copies/ml at 12 months were 40% (once daily ) and 45% (twice daily) for the intention-to-treat analysis. Five of 11 patients (45%) with plasma viral loads < 5 copies/ml at 12 months had detectable virus in tonsillar tissue. Genotypic resistance to nevirapine was noted in seven of the 14 patients with detectable viral load at month 12. Mean changes in CD4+ cell counts for patients treated with stavudine plus once- or twice-daily didanosine and nevirapine were 154 and 132 x 10(6) cells/l, respectively. Treatment was interrupted due to adverse events in seven patients (8%) (four who received once-daily didanosine and nevirapine and three treated with twice-daily doses).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of twice-daily stavudine plus once-daily didanosine and nevirapine was as safe and well tolerated as twice-daily administration of all three agents. Both regimens were equally effective in reducing viral loads and in increasing CD4+ cell counts.

Relationship between efficacy, tolerance, and plasma drug concentration of ritonavir in children with advanced HIV infection

The relationship between ritonavir plasma concentration, efficacy, and tolerance was evaluated in 31 children with advanced HIV infection who were receiving a triple therapy with ritonavir as protease inhibitor. Median CD4+ lymphocyte count and median viral load before the initiation of ritonavir-containing combination therapy were 1320 cells/mL and 5 log10 copies/mL, respectively. Ritonavir was given at a dose ranging from 300 to 450 mg/m2 twice daily. The median follow-up of triple therapy was 19 months. Response was defined as a drop of viremia of more than 1 log. Plasma drug levels were determined twice during the observation period: after at least 4 weeks and after 3 months of combined treatment. Samples were collected before (residual) and 2 hours (T2) after drug intake. Cholesterol, triglycerides, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase were assessed at the same time. The median values of ritonavir residual and T2 levels were 1.64 mg/L and 5.9 mg/L at observation 1 and 3.35 mg/L and 6.29 mg/L at observation 2, respectively. According to virologic response, median residual concentrations of ritonavir were 3.17, 2.52, and 1.04 mg/L for the complete, the partial, and the no-response groups. The authors observed a wide intersubject variability of ritonavir concentrations with an increase in residual levels between the two observation periods. Residual levels were correlated with virologic response whereas there was no direct association between T2 levels and long-term response. Patients with complete or partial response displayed statistically significantly higher residual concentrations than the no-response group. No correlation could be demonstrated between elevated plasma drug concentrations and abnormal cholesterol or triglycerides values. These results emphasize the importance of a sustained high ritonavir concentration to achieve optimal treatment efficacy. Furthermore, these results prove the clinical benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring and could potentially improve patient evaluation in terms of treatment efficacy, compliance, and viral resistance.

Pharmacologic characteristics of indinavir, didanosine, and stavudine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children receiving combination therapy

The use of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors in children has lagged behind that in adults because of the lack of suitable pediatric formulations and information on safe and effective dosing regimens. This study was designed to obtain pharmacokinetic information on indinavir, administered to HIV-infected children also receiving therapy with two nucleoside agents, and to explore relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters and anti-HIV effect. Indinavir was initiated at a dose of 500 mg/m(2) every 8 h. Plasma indinavir concentrations were measured every 4 weeks; the dose or dosing interval was adjusted to maintain trough concentrations of > or =0.1 mg/liter. All children were evaluated clinically at baseline and every 4 weeks. Plasma HIV RNA was quantitated at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, and 24. Eighteen children participated in this study. The average daily dose of indinavir was 2,043 mg/m(2); nine children received indinavir at 6-h intervals. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of indinavir (mean +/- standard deviation) were the following: oral clearance, 1.4 +/- 0.5 liters/h/kg; half-life, 1.1 +/- 0.43 h; and trough concentration, 0. 29 +/- 0.32 mg/liter. In nine children that completed 24 weeks of therapy, the baseline-to-week-24 change in HIV RNA level was related to indinavir trough concentration and didanosine area under the curve. This study illustrates the ability to obtain pharmacokinetic information from children during routine clinic visits and to use this information to provide a safeguard against underdosing. The incorporation of pharmacologic knowledge with virologic, immunologic, and behavioral considerations should result in improved clinical outcomes for children infected with HIV.

Indinavir pharmacokinetics and parmacodynamics in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection

The indinavir dosage regimen currently used for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children is not based on pharmacokinetic data obtained in the target patient population. The purpose of our study was to characterize indinavir pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in HIV-infected children. Eleven children (age range, 9.0 to 13.6 years; weight range, 21.7 to 56.0 kg) receiving indinavir (500 mg/m(2) every 8 h) in combination with lamivudine and stavudine were studied. The correlation of indinavir pharmacokinetic parameters and demographic parameters was evaluated. Also, the pharmacodynamic relationship between parameters of indinavir exposure and parameters of renal toxicity and immunologic recovery was studied. The area under the indinavir concentration-time curve (AUC) and patient body surface area (BSA) showed a significant negative correlation (r = 0.73; P = 0.012). Patients with smaller BSA had excessive indinavir AUC compared to adults. On the other hand, the median minimum drug concentration in plasma (C(min)) was lower than that reported for adults. The maximum indinavir concentration in serum was higher in patients with renal toxicity (5 out of 11 children), but the difference was not statistically significant (15.3 +/- 8.2 versus 9.8 +/- 4.4 mg/liter; P = 0.19). There was a trend toward higher immunologic efficacy in patients with greater indinavir exposure: the time-averaged AUC of the percentage of CD4(+) lymphocytes over the baseline value for patients with indinavir C(min) > 95% inhibitory concentration (IC(95)) was higher than in patients with C(min) < IC(95) (P = 0. 068). Our study suggests that a dose reduction may be appropriate for children with small BSA and that a 6-h dosage regimen may be indicated for a substantial percentage of patients. Due to the low number of patients enrolled in this study, our results should be confirmed by a larger study.

Antiretroviral therapy of HIV infection in children

Much progress has been made in the therapy of pediatric HIV infection, which has been transformed from a usually fatal disease into that of a chronic disease model. Early, aggressive therapy with the goal of complete suppression of viral replication (undetectable plasma virus) should be the therapeutic goal, but this new, more hopeful environment has been created at the cost of complexity and compromises in quality of life. The rapid pace of new developments and therapeutic complexities argue strongly for care in specialized centers or, at least, frequent consultation. Efforts are ongoing to develop simpler, more effective therapeutic regimens that suppress and ultimately eradicate infection and that stimulate immune reconstitution.

Immunologic and virologic responses to HAART in severely immunocompromised HIV-1-infected children

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term immunologic and virologic effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in children with AIDS.

DESIGN

A prospective observational study.

SETTING

Two pediatric HIV clinics.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five protease-inhibitor naive HIV-infected children (aged 2-18 years) with advanced disease (CD4 < or =6%).

INTERVENTION

HAART (one protease inhibitor and one or more nucleoside analogs). Diphtheria and tetanus immunization in six patients after 18 months of therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in percentage of CD4 cells and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels; post-treatment assays of lymphoproliferative responses to recall antigens; CD4 cell memory phenotype.

RESULTS

Median duration of follow-up was 18.8 months (range, 7.5-28 months). At baseline the CD4 cell percentage was 2% (range, 0-6%), this increased significantly to 16% (range, 3-48%) above baseline at 12 months (P = 0.002). The mean maximum CD4 cell increase was 20.7% (range 4-48%) which corresponds to 657x10(6) cells/l (range, 30-2240x10(6) cells/l) above baseline. By contrast, the median viral load was not significantly lower at 12 months than at baseline (P = 0.34), and only 25% of the patients had sustained undetectable viral load. Of the reconstituted CD4 cells 70% were naive, and none of the subjects had lymphoproliferative responses to tetanus and diphtheria although 40% did develop responses to Candida, an environmental antigen. A single immunization with diphtheria and tetanus toxoid produced lymphoproliferative responses to tetanus in three out of six patients.

CONCLUSIONS

HAART was associated with sustained increases in CD4 cell counts, despite a high incidence of 'virologic failure'. CD4 counts and the proportion of naive cells were higher than have been reported in adults, which may be a reflection of greater thymic activity in children. Memory cell clones for antigens encountered in the past which are not prevalent before therapy could not be expanded without additional antigenic exposure.

Combination therapy with efavirenz, nelfinavir, and nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 382 Team

BACKGROUND

Consistent long-term viral suppression has been difficult to achieve in children with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. We tested the safety and antiviral efficacy of a novel combination consisting of efavirenz, nelfinavir, and one or more nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors in 57 children previously treated with only nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors.

METHODS

The children were monitored for 48 weeks after the initiation of therapy. We assessed plasma concentrations of efavirenz and nelfinavir, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, and lymphocyte subpopulations.

RESULTS

At base line, the 57 HIV-1-infected children (age range, 3.8 to 16.8 years) had a median of 699 CD4 cells per cubic millimeter and 10,000 copies of HIV-1 RNA per milliliter of plasma. The most common treatment-related effects of at least moderate severity were rash (in 30 percent of children), diarrhea (in 18 percent), neutropenia (in 12 percent), and biochemical abnormalities (in 12 percent). Serious side effects were uncommon. The mean values for the area under the curve for efavirenz and nelfinavir corresponded to expected values. In an intention-to-treat analysis, 76 percent of children had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of less than 400 copies per milliliter after 48 weeks of therapy and 63 percent had levels of less than 50 copies per milliliter. A high plasma HIV-1 RNA level at base line significantly decreased the likelihood that plasma levels of HIV-1 RNA would become undetectable during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In HIV-1-infected children who were previously treated with nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, the combination of efavirenz, nelfinavir, and nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors was generally well tolerated and had a potent and sustained antiviral effect.

Clinical and immuno-virologic characterization of the efficacy of stavudine, lamivudine, and indinavir in human immunodeficiency virus infection

Clinical, virologic, and immunologic outcomes were analyzed in children with vertically transmitted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (n = 25) and clinical symptoms and evidence of immunosuppression to establish the efficacy of 18 months' treatment with stavudine, lamivudine, and indinavir. Children were naive for treatment with protease inhibitors and lamivudine and had minimal exposure to stavudine. At 1, 6, 12, and 18 months, the proportions of patients with HIV-RNA <400 copies/mL were 79%, 100%, 94%, 87% in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) immunologic class 2 and 50%, 67%, 67%, 72% in CDC immunologic class 3. At 12 months, the median CD4(+) count and percent increased significantly in both CDC immunologic class groups, but to a greater extent in the class 3 group. In the 12- to 18-month period, there were no significant changes within the groups. In both groups there was a steady increase in the proportion and number of children with positive skin test responses. Children in class 2 were more likely to have a positive delayed-type hypersensitivity response and a greater number of positive responses. Lymphocyte proliferative response to recall antigens improved significantly in all patients. The rate of increase in positive test results was faster in children in class 2 than in those in class 3. Only minor clinical events occurred during 18 months of therapy. Potent antiretroviral therapy achieves a sustained benefit in HIV-infected children, but immune reconstitution is more likely achieved in children with less advanced disease.

Indinavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection

Indinavir is a protease inhibitor used in the treatment of patients with HIV infection. Combination antiretroviral therapy with indinavir plus 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is associated with greater reductions in viral load, greater increases in CD4+ cell counts, and reduced morbidity and mortality when compared with 2 NRTIs alone. In the landmark clinical trial ACTG 320, the rate of progression to AIDS or death (primary end-point) among zidovudine-experienced patients treated with indinavir, zidovudine and lamivudine was approximately half that of patients who received only zidovudine plus lamivudine (6 vs 11%; p < 0.001). The durability of an indinavir-containing regimen was demonstrated in Merck protocol 035, an ongoing trial in which a significant proportion of patients had sustained viral suppression for up to 3 years. Merck protocol 039, also an ongoing trial, showed a greater effect on surrogate markers of HIV disease progression with indinavir-based triple therapy than with zidovudine plus lamivudine or indinavir monotherapy in patients with advanced disease (median baseline CD4+ count 15 cells/microL). Numerous additional clinical trials have established the beneficial antiviral and immunological effects of indinavir in both antiretroviral-naive and -experienced patients with HIV infection. Indinavir is associated with various drug class-related adverse events, including gastrointestinal disturbances (e.g. nausea, diarrhoea), headache and asthenia/fatigue. A lipodystrophy syndrome has been commonly reported with indinavir and other protease inhibitors combined with NRTIs, but it has also been reported in many protease inhibitor-naive patients, and a definitive causal link has not been established between the syndrome and protease inhibitors. Nephrolithiasis may develop in about 9% of patients receiving indinavir but does not appear to be associated with other protease inhibitors; <0.5% of patients receiving indinavir discontinue the drug because of nephrolithiasis, which may be the extreme end of a continuum of crystal-related renal syndromes. Additional renal problems (e.g. nephropathy) have been reported in small numbers of patients receiving indinavir. In summary, indinavir is a protease inhibitor with well documented efficacy when used as part of combined therapy in patients with HIV infection. Both US and UK treatment guidelines continue to recommend protease inhibitor-based regimens including indinavir as a first-line option. Indinavir is being studied as a twice daily and once daily regimen with a low dosage of ritonavir as a way to alleviate tolerability, drug interaction and patient compliance/adherence issues. Indinavir-containing triple therapy has demonstrated positive effects not only on surrogate markers of disease progression, but also on clinical end-points of mortality and morbidity in patients with HIV disease. Protease inhibitors are a significant advance in the care of patients with HIV infection, and, in an era of evidence-based medicine, indinavir represents an important component of antiretroviral treatment strategies.

Didanosine: an updated review of its use in HIV infection

Didanosine, like zidovudine, stavudine and lamivudine, is a nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI). In the target cell for HIV, didanosine is converted to its active moiety, dideoxyadenosine-5'-triphosphate (ddATP), which inhibits HIV reverse transcriptase and terminates viral DNA growth. It is now well established that didanosine therapy produces beneficial effects on virological and immunological markers of HIV disease and improves clinical outcome in adults or children with HIV infection. In numerous clinical trials, pronounced and sustained decreases in plasma HIV RNA levels and increases in CD4+ cell counts occurred in previously untreated or antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients treated with didanosine in combination with at least 1 other antiretroviral drug; zidovudine, stavudine, lamivudine, nevirapine, nelfinavir and hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide) are among the drugs that have been given in combination with didanosine. Of note, HIV RNA levels decreased to below the limits of detection in some patients receiving triple or dual therapy with didanosine-containing regimens. In double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, triple therapy with didanosine, zidovudine and nevirapine was significantly more effective than dual therapy with various combinations of these agents in improving surrogate disease markers in treatment-naive patients and in delaying disease progression or death in treatment-experienced patients with advanced disease. Improvements in virological and immunological markers were greater with didanosine-containing triple regimens than with dual therapy or monotherapy in comparative trials. Triple therapy with didanosine, stavudine and indinavir showed efficacy similar to that of various other triple therapy regimens in nonblind comparative trials. Comparator regimens included combinations of stavudine, lamivudine plus indinavir, zidovudine, lamivudine plus indinavir and didanosine, stavudine and nevirapine. Combination therapy with didanosine plus hydroxyurea as dual therapy or with a third agent produced marked and sustained decreases in HIV RNA levels in the plasma and in lymph nodes. Combination therapy with didanosine and zidovudine delays disease progression and prolongs survival in patients with intermediate or advanced HIV infection. In large, randomised, double-blind, clinical trials, dual therapy with didanosine plus zidovudine was significantly more effective than zidovudine monotherapy in preventing disease progression and prolonging survival in previously untreated or antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients with intermediate or advanced HIV infection. Pancreatitis and peripheral neuropathy are serious adverse effects of didanosine. These effects are dose-related and usually reversible after discontinuation of treatment. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and/or abdominal pain have been reported in patients receiving treatment with the drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Didanosine is an effective and generally well tolerated drug in previously untreated and antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients with HIV infection. Given once or twice daily, it has an important role as a component of triple combination regimens for the treatment of patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic HIV infection.

Antiretroviral therapy of pediatric HIV infection: making hope a reality

Over the past 3 years, the treatment and prognosis of HIV-1 infection have been revolutionized by a better understanding of the pathogenesis of HIV-1 infection, the ability to monitor viral replication and drug resistance in the host, and the availability of potent combination chemotherapy. While most of the studies that have led to this transformation have been done in adults, the results can be applied to the care of children. Data from trials of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in children are now being presented or published. Although the basic principles of antiretroviral therapy of HIV-1 infection do not differ between adults and children, there are important differences in the natural history of the disease and in issues related to medication administration and adherence to therapy. Progression of disease may be more rapid in children and is often very rapid in infants. Administration of medication to infants and children can be difficult, especially when the medication tastes bad. Finally, whereas an adult patient is free to decline therapy, however foolish such a decision may seem to the health-care professional, the failure to administer effective medication to a child for a condition that threatens serious morbidity or death constitutes medical neglect. In this review we will discuss the basic principles underlying pediatric antiretroviral therapy and address the issue of adherence, the major impediment to treatment success.

Efficacy of and adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials in adults have demonstrated the efficacy of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) to suppress replication of HIV-1 to nondetectable levels, but lower success rates have been observed in practice. We sought to determine the efficacy of HAART in our population of HIV-1-infected children and to identify determinants of efficacy, especially the role of adherence to prescribed antiretrovirals.

METHODS

The viral load and CD4+ T cell responses of 72 children with perinatally acquired HIV-1 treated with HAART including a protease inhibitor for at least 90 days were examined retrospectively in relation to adherence, as measured by pharmacy records for the first 180 days of HAART.

RESULTS

Patients were defined as adherent if > or =75% of protease inhibitors and > or =75% of all antiretroviral prescriptions were filled. Of the 42 patients (58%) who were adherent, nondetectable viral loads were achieved and maintained in 22 (52%). A Kaplan-Meier plot showed a drop-off in patients maintaining a nondetectable viral load after 200 days. Higher initial viral load was the only pretreatment factor that identified adherent patients at risk for treatment failure. Only 3 (10%) nonadherent patients maintained a viral load of <400 copies/ml. The adherent group had a prompt and sustained increase in CD4+ T cell counts.

CONCLUSIONS

HAART can achieve control of viral replication in HIV-1-infected children who adhere to therapy. However, treatment failure is likely unless there is a high level of adherence. Nonadherence to therapy is common and might be the major impediment to successful treatment of children infected with HIV-1.

Correlation of clinical parameters and immunological function with human immunodeficiency virus plasma viremia in children

Studies of immune function in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children are important, because functional abnormalities can precede CD4+ T-cell loss and are associated with the development of opportunistic and bacterial infections. We sought to correlate clinical parameters and immunological function with HIV RNA plasma levels in 20 children. HIV RNA levels were measured by a polymerase chain reaction assay. We analyzed T-cell responses to mitogens (phytohemagglutinin, concanavalin A, and pokeweed [PWM]) and antigens (tetanus toxoid and Candida albicans); T-cell suppressor activity; and humoral immunity to Haemophilus influenzae, hepatitis B, tetanus, and diphtheria vaccines. The median age of the children was 6 years. Eight children had HIV RNA levels less than 200 to 9621 copies per milliliter (group I). Four children had 37,970 to 82,630 copies per milliliter (group II). Eight children had 102,100 to 191,200 copies per milliliter (group III). There were no differences in the HIV-related complications between group I and II children. Group I/II children had significantly higher CD4+ T-cell counts (P = 0.02), less symptomatic HIV disease (P = 0.005), and more detectable protective vaccine immunity (P = 0.014) compared with group III children. Responses to mitogens were conserved in most children. Group I children tended to have higher responses to tetanus toxoid than group II children and significantly higher responses than group III children (P = 0.01). Group I had significantly higher responses to C. albicans than groups II (P = 0.016) and III (P = 0.001). Group I/II children tended to have lower suppressor activity compared with group III children (median, 0 vs 64%). We demonstrated that humoral and cellular immune dysfunction exists at all stages of disease in HIV-infected children but was most severe in children with greater than or equal to 100,000 HIV RNA copies per milliliter. Function was the most intact in children with less than 10,000 copies per milliliter.

Combination therapy with stavudine (d4T) plus didanosine (ddI) in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection. The Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 327 Team

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety, tolerance, and antiviral activity of combination therapy with stavudine (d4T) plus didanosine (ddI) in symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children.

METHODS

The study enrolled HIV-infected children who successfully completed Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (PACTG) protocol 240 (d4T versus zidovudine [ZDV] monotherapy) without disease progression or who had received ZDV monotherapy by prescription for at least the preceding 6 months. Children who had received d4T monotherapy in PACTG 240 were assigned to treatment with d4T plus ddI (arm 1). Children who had received ZDV monotherapy in PACTG 240 or by prescription were randomized in a double-blind manner to treatment with either d4T alone (arm 2) or d4T plus ddI (arm 3). Patients were followed for 48 weeks each.

RESULTS

A total of 108 children were enrolled. The mean age was 5.0 years (range, 1. 6 to 11.5 years), with mean baseline plasma HIV RNA concentration and CD4(+) lymphocyte count of 4.6 log10 copies/mL (range, 2.6 to 5. 9 log10 copies/mL) and 819 cells/microL (range, 8 to 3431 cells/microL), respectively. Both d4T monotherapy and d4T plus ddI combination therapy were well-tolerated, with 96 (89%) patients completing 48 weeks of study treatment. Plasma HIV RNA concentrations showed larger average declines in arm 3 compared with arm 2 at study week 12 (0.49 vs 0.18 log10 copies/mL, respectively); these average declines were maintained through week 48 (0.51 vs 0.17 log10 copies/mL, respectively). Fewer than 8% of the patients in any of the treatment arms had plasma HIV RNA concentrations below the limit of quantification (200 copies/mL) at any time point.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with d4T plus ddI is safe and well-tolerated in HIV-infected children, producing durable, but incomplete, suppression of virus replication. This combination of nucleoside antiretroviral agents may provide a valuable backbone to protease inhibitor-containing treatment regimens for HIV-infected children.

Stavudine Resistance: An Update on Susceptibility following Prolonged Therapy

The current report summarizes the available published and unpublished data from several investigators on resistance in clinical isolates following prolonged stavudine therapy. Results suggest that stavudine resistance is both modest in degree and infrequent in appearance. Phenotypic evaluation of 61 patients on stavudine therapy showed only modest changes in drug sensitivity following up to 29 months of treatment. The post-treatment isolates from 15 patients exhibited an increase in EC50 value >fourfold (level above variability of assay) when compared with the corresponding pretreatment isolates. However, the vast majority (11) of these pretreatment isolates either had unexpectedly low EC50 levels and/or had post-treatment isolates that lacked any amino acid changes within their reverse transcriptase (RT) gene to account for the observed change in sensitivity. Of the four remaining isolates, two appeared to have a multi-resistant phenotype to several nucleoside analogues and two had no detectable RT amino acid changes to account for the observed change in stavudine sensitivity. To date, clinical HIV-1 isolates displaying stavudine-specific resistance have yet to be reported. Furthermore, full or partial RT sequence analysis of 194 post-treatment isolates failed to identify any consistent amino acid changes. The strain-specific V75T mutation reported to confer stavudine resistance to the HXB2 HIV-1 strain in vitro, was found in only six isolates and did not correlate with stavudine resistance. This low incidence of stavudine resistance is in striking contrast to that observed with other nucleoside analogues and further supports the use of stavudine in first-line combination therapy for HIV patients.

A phase I/II study of the protease inhibitor indinavir in children with HIV infection

BACKGROUND

Indinavir, an inhibitor of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease, is approved for the treatment of HIV infection in adults when antiretroviral therapy is indicated. We evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of the indinavir free-base liquid suspension and the sulfate salt dry-filled capsules in HIV-infected children, and studied its preliminary antiviral and clinical activity in this patient population. In addition, we evaluated the pharmacokinetic profile of a jet-milled suspension after a single dose.

METHODS

Previously untreated children or patients with progressive HIV disease despite antiretroviral therapy or with treatment-associated toxicity were eligible for this phase I/II study. Three dose levels (250 mg/m2, 350 mg/m2, and 500 mg/m2 per dose given orally every 8 h) were evaluated in 2 age groups (<12 years and >/=12 years). Indinavir was initially administered as monotherapy and then in combination with zidovudine and lamivudine after 16 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifty-four HIV-infected children (ages 3.1 to 18.9 years) were enrolled. The indinavir free-base suspension was less bioavailable than the dry-filled capsule formulation, and therapy was changed to capsules in all children. Hematuria was the most common side effect, occurring in 7 (13%) children, and associated with nephrolithiasis in 1 patient. The combination of indinavir, lamivudine, and zidovudine was well tolerated. The median CD4 cell count increased after 2 weeks of indinavir monotherapy by 64 cells/mm3, and this was sustained at all dose levels. Plasma ribonucleic acid levels decreased rapidly in a dose-dependent way, but increased toward baseline after a few weeks of indinavir monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Indinavir dry-filled capsules are relatively well tolerated by children with HIV infection, although hematuria occurs at higher doses. Future studies need to evaluate the efficacy of indinavir when combined de novo with zidovudine and lamivudine.