Latex sensitization in spina bifida appears disease-associated

Latex allergy guidelines for people with spina bifida

An estimated 85% of individuals with spina bifida (SB) survive into adulthood, warranting SB-specific transition to adult healthcare guidelines to address the diverse and complex medical, adaptive, and social needs particular to this condition. Latex allergy constitutes one important health concern for this population that requires ongoing and life-long evidence-based management. This article discusses management of latex allergy according to the SB Latex Allergy Healthcare Guidelines from the 2018 Spina Bifida Association's Fourth Edition of the Guidelines for the Care of People with Spina Bifida, reviews current care models in which such latex allergy guidelines can be implemented, and explores further relevant research topics in SB care relative to latex allergy.

Low prevalence of latex allergy in children with spinal dysraphism in non-latex-free environment

BACKGROUND

Studies in the past have shown that children with spinal dysraphism have highly prevalent latex allergy. These children have a spectrum of congenital spinal anomalies, caused by defects in neural tube closure, with an incidence of 1 in 1000 births. Proposed risk factors for latex allergy include multiple surgeries since birth, including an insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, elevated IgE titers, repeat multiple catheterizations, and atopy. In the 1990 s, studies published in the United States and Europe showed a latex allergy prevalence of over 70% in these patients. On the other hand, studies published years later in other countries showed a declining prevalence of no more than 17%.

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to prospectively assess the prevalence of latex allergy in children with spinal dysraphism in our non-latex free environment center compared with a control group.

STUDY DESIGN

The study group included 58 children with spinal dysraphism attending our center between 2010 and 2013. Findings were compared to 65 children referred for evaluation of allergic diseases. The parents completed questionnaires assessing personal and familial history of allergic diseases. All children were tested for blood latex IgE-specific antibodies (IMMULITE 2000).

RESULTS

The mean age was 120.9 (67.6) months in the study group and 129.5 (68.5) months in the control group (p = 0.27). The corresponding median number of surgical procedures was 2 (range 0-10) and 0 (range 0-4), and mean duration of clean intermittent catheterization was 52 (72.2) months in the study group. Positive IgE antibodies and clinical allergic reactions were low with very similar prevalence in both groups (Figure).

DISCUSSION

Our results show considerable lower latex allergy and sensitization than studies published in the United States and Europe in the past, despite the fact that our center utilizes minimal avoidance measures for latex allergy. Study limitations include the relatively small number of patients in our single-center study. Moreover, our control group could not include normal volunteering healthy children due to institutional review board refusal.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with spinal dysraphism in our center have a low prevalence of latex allergy. Possible explanations include low latex protein content gloves and catheters used worldwide, including our center, lower number of surgeries, or a disease associated propensity for latex sensitization with a geographically variable genetic association. More studies are needed to validate our conclusion that using minimal avoidance measures, without maintaining a strict latex free environment, seems sufficient to prevent clinical latex allergy, at least in the Mediterranean region.

Latex sensitization and allergy in children with spina bifida in Turkey

PURPOSE

The latex allergy is known as a very frequent problem of children with spina bifida (SB). The aim of this prospective study is to determine the frequency of latex sensitization and allergy in Turkish children with SB and to evaluate the related risk factors.

METHODS

We enrolled a total of 175 children and collected them in four groups of patients: children with SB, children who had neurosurgical disorders other than SB, atopic children with allergic diseases, and healthy children as control group. All cases were evaluated for latex sensitivity and allergy with skin prick tests and specific IgE. The diagnosis of latex allergy was confirmed with the latex provocation test.

RESULTS

Ten children with SB, two children with other neurological disorders, and three atopic children with allergic disease were found "sensitized to latex". Among these sensitized children, only one child with SB had latex allergy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the children with SB and other neurologic disorders and the whole group of patients showed that skin test positivity, the presence of noncentral nervous system (CNS) surgery, and the number of the operations were significant risk factors for latex sensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that rates of latex sensitivity and allergy in children with SB in Turkey are significantly lower than published rates in literature. We also found that atopy, the presence of non-CNS operations in children with SB and other neurologic disorder, and total number of operations in the whole group of patients are the most important risk factors for latex sensitization.

Effects of latex avoidance on latex sensitization, atopy and allergic diseases in patients with spina bifida

BACKGROUND

Ten years ago, avoidance measures such as the performance of latex-free operations were implemented in children with spina bifida. Since then, latex sensitization and latex allergy have decreased in this high-risk group.

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of primary latex-free prophylaxis on the prevalence of allergic diseases and atopy as a marker for sensitization spreading in children with spina bifida.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty children with spina bifida born after the introduction of latex-free prophylaxis and operated on under latex-free conditions ('current group') were examined for latex sensitization, latex allergy, sensitization to aero- and food allergens and allergic diseases. Results were compared to a 'historic' (not latex-free operated) group of children with spina bifida and comparable age (n = 87) and to a recent sample of children from the general population (n = 12,403).

RESULTS

In comparison with the 'historic group', latex sensitization (55% vs 5%, P < 0.001) and latex allergy (37% vs 0.8%, P < 0.001) were significantly reduced in the 'current group'. Furthermore, a significant reduction could be demonstrated for sensitization to aeroallergens (41.4% vs 20.8%, P = 0.001) and for allergic diseases (35% vs 15%, P = 0.001). The prevalence for atopy, sensitization to aero-/foodallergens and for allergic diseases in children of the 'current group' was similar to those in children of the weighted population sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Latex avoidance in children with spina bifida prevents latex sensitization and latex allergy. Additionally, it also seems to prevent sensitization to other allergens and allergic diseases which might be explained by the prevention of sensitization spreading.

IgE-mediated latex allergy--an exciting and instructive piece of allergy history

Natural rubber latex represents a potent allergen, which for many years had an important impact on occupational health problems but especially on certain risk groups such as spina bifida. Luckily, these problems decreased when powder-free, latex-poor gloves were introduced. Latest data show that in children with spina bifida, who grew up completely latex-free from birth on, sensitization to NRL as well as clinical relevant allergy significantly decreased. Furthermore, sensitization to aeroallergens also went down and even the prevalence of allergic diseases decreased significantly to rates of the general population. This new data clearly indicates that potent allergens (such as latex) in high-risk groups (such as spina bifida) can induce sensitization spreading, and corresponding avoidance can reverse this development. In conclusion, it can be stated that 'new' allergies can suddenly arise, there are allergen-specific risk groups, local IgE-production is also possible in the CNS, allergen avoidance can be very effective in terms of primary prevention, sensitization spreading can be made reversible by effective prevention, and finally, certain allergies can luckily become history within a relatively short period of time. Furthermore, these new findings clearly end the debate about whether patients with spina bifida have a disease-inherited risk for allergy to NRL and show that the cause is the meningi and the multiple surgical interventions - and therefore sequelae can be reversed by implementing preventive measures.

Prevalance of latex sensitization and associated risk factors in Turkish children with spina bifida

PURPOSE

Among children with spina bifida there is a high prevalence of latex allergy in reports from Europe and USA. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of latex sensitization and associated risk factors in children with spina bifida in Middle-Eastern region (Istanbul, Turkey).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty consecutive children affected with spina bifida were included in the study. Data were collected about age, sex, family and personal history of atopy, and the number and type of operations classified as neurosurgical, urological, and orthopedic. All patients underwent skin prick test using latex solutions and cross-reacting foods. Total and latex-specific IgE levels were also measured.

RESULTS

Latex sensitization was shown in 16% (13/80) of the patients with specific IgE > 0.7 kU/L. The number of operation, using intermittent bladder catheterization and ventricular-peritoneal shunt were significantly associated with latex sensitization.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of latex sensitization in this study was lower than reported in the literature. Environmental factors such as the type and number of operations and geographical location may play a role in the development of latex sensitization.

Unexpected source of latex sensitization in a neonatal intensive care unit

We report a term infant with gastroschisis who presented with a systemic allergic reaction at a specific time of each day coinciding with infusion from a new preparation of total parenteral nutrition and intravenous lipid emulsion. The source of latex was traced to the rubber stopper of the lipid emulsion. We present this case to highlight the possibility of allergy from this unexpected source in a neonate.

Early exposure to latex products mediates latex sensitization in spina bifida but not in other diseases with comparable latex exposure rates

BACKGROUND

The high prevalence of latex sensitization in patients with spina bifida (SB) has been attributed to repeated and early exposure to latex products. Other diseases such as gastroschisis/omphalocoele and post-haemorrhagic/congenital hydrocephalus are also associated with repeated and early latex exposure.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the high prevalence of latex sensitization in patients with SB is rather related to the underlying disease itself than to disease-associated known risk factors.

METHODS

We compared children with SB (n=35), children with gastroschisis/omphalocoele (G/O, n=20) and children with post-haemorrhagic/congenital hydrocephalus (PH, n=45). All children with SB and PH had a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt since a very young age. Patients who underwent three or less surgical procedures matched in terms of age, number of operations, atopy and gender distribution, and were analysed for IgE sensitization rates to latex.

RESULTS

In the SB group, 16 of 35 patients (46%) showed elevated latex-specific IgE antibodies in contrast to one of 20 patients (5%) in the G/O group and four of 45 patients (8.9%) in the PH group (P<0.0005 and P<0.005, Fisher's exact test). Comparing matched control groups (<or=3 operations), the effects remained significant (P<0.05 and P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the SB population bears a disease-associated propensity for latex sensitization. This effect cannot be explained exclusively by a higher number of operations and differences related to atopy, age or gender.

Latex sensitisation and allergy in children with myelomeningocele

INTRODUCTION

Children with spina bifida (SB) have a high degree of exposure to latex products as a consequence of repeated surgical procedures, implantation of latex-containing materials and catheterisation. The consequence is a higher incidence of latex allergic reactions.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of latex sensitisation and allergy in a population of children with myelomeningocele (MMC) and to assess the role of associated risk factors.

RESULTS

Forty-eight percent of the patients (29 out of 60) showed a latex sensitisation with specific IgE >0.7 kU/l while 15% (9 out of 60) were allergic to latex (specific IgE >0.7 kU/l and clinical manifestations). The principal factor correlated with allergy to latex was specific serum IgE to latex (radioallergosorbent test [RAST]) values (p<0.01). Other factors were total serum IgE (paper radioimmunosorbent test [PRIST]) values, number of surgical procedures and familiarity with allergy.

CONCLUSION

These results underline the importance of prophylactic measures to avoid the exposure, not only in the sanitary environment, through the institution of latex-safe routes, but also in daily life, to prevent potentially serious allergic reactions.

Myelomeningocele, avocados, and rubber tree plants

Infants with myelomeningocele and the nurses who care for them have something in common. Both are at higher risk than the general population for developing latex allergies. This article provides a review of the literature regarding latex production, latex allergic responses in children and adults, types of latex allergic reactions, and prevention of latex allergies.

Neural tube defects in Pondicherry

OBJECTIVE

This study was carried out to identify the trend and the frequency of neural tube defects from July 1998 to June 2004.

METHODS

A total of 310 babies were born with neural tube defects with the overall frequency of 5.7/1000 births compared to 2.3/1000 births observed earlier in our hospital.

RESULTS

The most common defect was spina bifida (54.8%) followed by anencephaly (31.6%), and encephalocele (11.6%). More neural tube defects were observed in female and low birth weight babies, still births and unbooked mothers. Neural tube defect was significantly higher among babies born to parents of consanguineous marriage (p< 0.01). Associated congenital defects were observed in thirty nine (12.6%) cases.

CONCLUSION

The rise in the frequency of NTDS may indicate the current trend of NTDs in Southern India. A further prospective study is desired to measure the effectiveness of regular folic acid supplementation in bringing down this frequency.

Influence of the type of operations on the development of latex sensitization in children with myelomeningocele

BACKGROUND

A genetic tendency to develop latex IgE responses in children with spina bifida has been suggested, but their degree of exposure to latex as well as the route and chronology for sensitization can be different from those of other children with multiple surgeries. The aim was to study the influence of the type of operation on the development of latex sensitization in children with myelomeningocele.

METHODS

In 90 children with myelomeningocele operated with latex, data were collected about age, sex, family, and personal history of allergy, serum total IgE, presence of a ventricular-peritoneal (v-p) shunt, and number and duration of operations, classified as urological, orthopedic, on the v-p shunt, other neurosurgical, and others. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, using the presence of latex sensitization as dependent variable.

RESULTS

Serum total IgE, the number of urological and of orthopedic operations were synergistic variables to predict latex sensitization, together with the presence of a v-p shunt, but not the number of operations performed on this device. This seems to play an adjuvant role in the process of sensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only the number, but also the type of operations, namely, of urological and orthopedic nature, is important in the development of latex sensitization in children with myelomeningocele.

[Latex allergy]

Latex allergy has become an increasing cause of morbility in the last few years and is now recognized as an international health problem. The prevalence of latex sensitization among the general population is less than 1 %. The groups at highest risk include healthcare workers, rubber industry workers, patients with a history of multiple surgical procedures, particularly children with spina bifida and urogenital abnormalities, atopic individuals, and patients with certain fruit allergies (especially kiwi, avocado, chestnut and banana). The molecular and immunological characteristics of several natural latex allergens have been identified. Symptoms range from contact urticaria to anaphylaxis. Diagnosis is based on clinical history and is confirmed by skin prick tests. Measurement of serum specific IgE to latex can also be useful. The best treatment is latex avoidance and substitution by other materials. However, because latex products are ubiquitous in medical and nonmedical devices of daily use, a latex-free environment is not easy to achieve. In some patients, immunotherapy could be an alternative.

HLA-DQ8 and the HLA-DQ8-DR4 haplotype are positively associated with the hevein-specific IgE immune response in health care workers with latex allergy

BACKGROUND

Hevein is one of the most important latex allergens affecting health care workers (HCWs).

OBJECTIVE

Because the genetically determined susceptibility is one important factor regulating type I allergy, the association between the hevein-specific IgE immune response and HLA class II alleles of DQB1 and DRB1, DRB3, DRB4, and DRB5 was studied.

METHODS

The distribution of HLA-DQB1 and DRB1, DRB3, DRB4, and DRB5 in 269 HCWs with latex allergy, 56 latex-sensitized patients with spina bifida (SB), and 90 nonatopic control subjects under special consideration for hevein-specific IgE was examined.

RESULTS

Seventy percent (189/269) of the HCWs with latex allergy and 39% (22/56) of the latex-sensitized patients with SB had increased hevein-specific IgE antibody concentrations (>0.35 kU/L). HLA data analysis revealed significantly increased phenotype frequencies for DQB1*0302 (DQ8; 91/189 [48%]) and DRB1*04 (DR4; 102/189 [54%]) in hevein-positive HCWs with latex allergy compared with the 80 hevein-negative HCWs with latex allergy (DQB1*0302: 16/80 [20%], corrected P value [P (c)] = 7.1 x 10(-4); DRB1*04: 23/80 [29%], P (c) =.01) and with control subjects (DQB1*0302: 16/89 [18%], P (c) = 1 x 10(-4); DRB1*04: 22/90 [24%], P (c) = 3.2 x 10(-4)). The DQ8-DR4 haplotype frequency was significantly elevated in HCWs with hevein-specific IgE antibodies when compared with that in HCWs without hevein-specific IgE antibodies (47% vs 18%, P (c) = 5.3 x 10(-4)) or control subjects (47% vs 18%, P (c) = 9.6 x 10(-4)). In contrast, latex-sensitized patients with SB with hevein-specific IgE antibodies showed an increased but not significant DQB1*0302 frequency (7/22 [32%] vs 2/34 [6%], P =.02, P (c) = not significant) compared with that seen in those without hevein-specific IgE antibodies.

CONCLUSION

The DQB1*0302 (DQ8) alone, the DQB1*0302 (DQ8)-DRB1*04 (DR4) haplotype, or both are significantly involved in the hevein-specific IgE immune response in HCWs with latex allergy.

[Latex allergy in patients with spina bifida: prevention and treatment]

Latex allergy has become a health problem of growing interest due to the severe clinical manifestations it may produce. Previous reports indicate a prevalence of latex allergy in patients with spina bifida (SB) ranging between 10% and 73%. From the initial surgical repair of the myelomeningocele, children with SB are submitted to multiple surgeries due to the neurologic, orthopedic and urologic problems they may present. Consequently, these children are exposed to several latex-containing products during their multiple interventions. Several reports indicate that latex allergy in SB children is related to age, and especially to the number of operations that they are given, and perhaps to an unknown genetic predisposition. Accordingly, latex allergy manifestations can be prevented. In this connection, we have elaborated at our hospital protocols for the management of the three clinical situations in which these patients can present. These measures include: (1) To avoid using latex-containing products since the birth of children with SB. (2) In children already operated of myelomeningocele but without evidence of latex allergy, to prevent the use of latex materials during their successive admissions to hospital and during further surgeries. And (3) In children known to have developed latex allergy, to dispose of especial nursing measures and of a latex-free operating room. The preventive measures that have been started at our Hospital are easy to carry out, do not suppose a high economic cost, and are not uncomfortable for the hospital's staff.

Extractable latex allergens in airborne glove powder and in cut glove pieces

BACKGROUND

Quantification of natural rubber latex (NRL) allergens of NRL glove extracts has been reported in several studies. Similarly, immunoassay studies reporting the level of NRL aeroallergens in air samples have been published. When studying the NRL allergens of gloves, however, little attention has been focused on identifying the relationship between extractable NRL allergens of medical gloves and NRL aeroallergens in indoor air.

OBJECTIVE

In an experimental study we analysed NRL aeroallergens of medical gloves in joint relation to total airborne dust concentration and NRL allergen concentration in gloves.

METHODS

NRL aeroallergen level was measured using a chamber setting with 18 lots of powdered medical gloves. In each setting 10 pairs of powdered NRL gloves were swinging in an unventilated chamber (9 m3). Air samples were collected using airflow through Millipore filters (pore size 0.8 microm). The filters were weighed before and after the experiment, and total airborne dust concentration in the chamber was calculated. The filter samples were then extracted and the NRL allergen level measured by IgE ELISA-inhibition assay. Furthermore, cut NRL gloves were extracted and analysed by the same method. Finally, levels of two major NRL allergens, Hev b1 and Hev b 6.02, were measured in three selected NRL glove brands.

RESULTS

The NRL aeroallergen level in the chamber air ranged from < 0.9 to 2.9 allergen units (AU)/m3. The total airborne dust concentration in the chamber air remained low with all lots of gloves measured (range < 20 to 80 microg/m3). The NRL allergen level in cut glove extracts varied over 100-fold (< 10 to 1050 AU/mL). Statistically significant correlation between aeroallergen concentration and airborne dust (r = 0.8, P = 0.0015) concentration was found. Moreover, significant correlation between aeroallergen levels and allergen content of cut glove pieces was observed (r = 0.59, P < 0.05). Hev b 1 levels varied from 9 to 25 ng/mL and the levels of Hev b 6.02 from 1720 to 14460 ng/mL in the glove extracts. In the extracts from airborne dust samples, Hev b 6.02 content varied from 61 to 183 ng/m3, whereas Hev b 1 levels were very low (0.4 to 3 ng/m3).

CONCLUSION

An elevated NRL aeroallergen level is rather related to a high level of airborne glove powder than to a high concentration of extractable NRL allergen in medical gloves.

Severe anaphylactic shock without exanthema in a case of unknown latex allergy and review of the literature

We describe a case of severe anaphylactic shock without exanthema in an 8-year-old boy who was undergoing elective surgery for an ileostomy. The boy had a history of four anorectal operations in the newborn period, but no history of allergies. Sudden, profound bronchospasm and cardiorespiratory collapse occurred 30 min after the beginning of the operation. No signs of exanthema or urticaria were seen. The patient was resuscitated successfully and remained ventilated for 25 h. During this time, he needed epinephrine in dosages of 0.3-0.05 microg.kg-1.min-1. Radioallergosorbent (RAST) tests for the patient were positive Cap Class 3 and 4, and specific immunoglobulin E was highly positive, suggesting a natural rubber latex allergy as the cause of the anaphylactic shock. Ethylene oxide was negative. Eleven days later, a further operation was performed with a strict latex-free protocol in the presence of histamine 1 and 2 receptor antagonists. On this occasion, the intraoperative course was uneventful. Incidence of anaphylactic reactions, prevalence of latex sensitization, special risk groups and management are discussed.

Latex hypersensitivity: personal data and review of the literature

Latex allergy is an increasingly common condition, because use of latex products is widespread. The reactions to latex manufactures can be classified as allergic and non-allergic, these are the most common. Latex proteins are responsible for immediate IgE-mediated hypersensitivity allergic reactions. Symptoms range from rhinitis, conjunctivitis and urticaria to anaphylactic shock. Chemical additives can cause allergic contact dermatitis. The clinical symptoms of latex allergy could arise from direct contact with latex products, but may also result from inhalation of airborne allergens. Subpopulations at particular risk include: atopics, children with spina bifida or individuals who required frequent surgical instrumentations, health care workers, and all persons who have regular contact with latex products. Diagnosis of allergy is based initially on history: search for specific serum IgE, skin prick test and provocation test may confirm the suspicion. The most effective strategy in the treatment of latex allergy is avoidance, however this is virtually impossible, given large number of latex products we encounter since childhood. In this paper we review the current state of knowledge concerning latex allergy, including the clinical spectrum, identified allergens, the cross-reactions regarding the latex-fruit syndrome, diagnostic procedures and preventive measures. Several personal data increase awareness on this issue.

[Peculiarities of latex allergy and preventive measures in the pediatric age group]

Latex allergy can be considered a problem of public health in at-risk populations. Although the figures on prevalence vary, approximately 1 % of the general population is sensitized to latex. To date, two determining factors for latex sensitization have been identified: an atopic predisposition and the number of operations. Among atopic patients or those at-risk for allergy, the prevalence of latex sensitization is between 3 and 20 times higher than that among the general population. Nevertheless, the effect of this factor seems to be modulatory and the determining factor seems to be the number of operations that children have undergone; the critical number is 5-6 interventions, after which the probability of sensitization increases considerably.All children who have undergone multiple operations should be considered as being at-risk. Children with spina bifida are especially at-risk. The reasons for this are still a matter of debate: the disease itself has been postulated as a specific risk factor, although other, possible associated factors could be determinant in triggering latex sensitization (the presence of a ventricular-peritoneal shunt, age at which surgery was performed, type of operation, etc.). Children with spina bifida and latex allergy show considerable differences in type of allergic sensitization; these differences seem to result from the different route of sensitization and could explain the variations observed in the clinical manifestations between children and adults: children become sensitized mainly by direct contact between latex particles and blood vessels and open mucosae while in adults the process takes place transcutaneously or by inhalation of aerosol particles. Consequently, the most frequent manifestation in children is urticaria while contact dermatitis and respiratory symptoms predominate in adults. Studies performed with immunoblotting have confirmed that children have IgE that almost constantly recognize low molecular weight latex proteins (14, 15 and 27 Kd) while this finding is less frequent in adults.The preventive measures in the pediatric population focus on avoidance of latex, especially in hospitals. Today, latex is ubiquitous, making complete avoidance difficult. When necessary, and whenever a latex-free environment cannot be guaranteed, presurgical medication can be used, although its utility is debatable. Although further studies are required, specific immunotherapy is one therapeutic possibility that may in future be used in children with latex allergy.

Type I allergy to natural rubber latex and type IV allergy to rubber chemicals in health care workers with glove-related skin symptoms

BACKGROUND

It has been established that there are type I and type IV allergens in latex gloves.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to establish the prevalence of rubber glove-induced skin symptoms among health care workers in one Italian hospital.

METHODS

Health care workers (n = 1584) were evaluated using a written questionnaire and 295 respondents with glove-induced skin symptoms were tested. We performed: skin prick test with latex glove extract and commercial latex, and environmental and food allergens; glove use test; patch tests with a rubber additive series; and RASTs.

RESULTS

Hospital employees who used or had used latex gloves at work were 1294. Three hundred and sixteen (24.4%) reported glove-induced symptoms, namely, cutaneous symptoms in all the cases and non-cutaneous symptoms in 105 subjects (8.1%). Twenty-seven of the 295 symptomatic employees tested (9.1%) were latex sensitive. Thirty-one patients (10.5%) exhibited positive patch test to rubber-related allergens. The most positive readings were obtained from the Thiuram mix and the Carba mix, with 12 and 9 positivities, respectively. The risk factors for latex skin sensitization were: a previous history of atopy and asthma; history of surgery; pre-existing hand dermatitis; work-related symptoms; and positive skin tests to common inhalant and certain foods (P < 0.05). Subjects who exhibited positive patch test were significantly more likely to have a prior hand dermatitis (P < 0.001). Of the 295 cases, 275 (93.2%) were contact dermatitis (CD), 13 (4.4%) contact urticaria (CU) (including protein CD) and 7 (2.4%) CD associated with CU.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show a high prevalence of rubber glove-induced dermatoses among the employees in one Italian hospital. The majority of skin complaints of latex gloves are related to skin irritation rather than to allergy. The immediate allergy to latex and the delayed allergy to rubber chemicals suggest that all the health care workers with glove-related dermatitis should undergo both skin prick test and glove use test to detect type I hypersensitivity to latex, and patch test to detect type IV hypersensitivity to rubber chemicals.

Risk factors for latex sensitization in children with spina bifida

BACKGROUND

Children with spina bifida represent the major risk group for latex sensitization.

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of latex sensitization in these children and to identify risk factors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We studied 57 patients with spina bifida. The mean age was 5.6 years and the male/female ratio was 0.8/1. In all patients a questionnaire, skin prick test (SPT) with latex (UCB-Stallergènes, Lofarma and ALK-Abelló), common aeroallergens and fruits (UCB-Stallergènes) and serum determination of total IgE (AlaSTAT) were performed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of latex sensitization was 30 %; only two sensitized children (12 %) had symptoms after exposure. Risk factors for latex sensitization were age >/= 5 years (p = 0.008; OR = 6.0; 95 % CI = 1.7-22.1), having at least four previous surgical interventions (p < 0.0001; OR = 18.5; 95 % CI = 3.6-94.8), having undergone surgery in the first 3 months of life (p = 0.008; OR = 5.4; 95 % CI = 0.7-29.2) and total serum IgE >/= 44 IU/ml (p = 0.03; OR = 3.8; 95 %CI = 1.1-13.1). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that only a history of four or more surgical interventions (p < 0.0001; OR = 26.3; 95 %CI = 2.9-234.2) and total serum IgE >/= 44 IU/ml (p = 0.02; OR = 8.6; 95 % CI = 1.4-53.4) were independently associated with latex sensitization. Sex, family and personal allergic history, hydrocephalus with ventriculoperitoneal shunt, cystourethrograms, intermittent bladder catheterization and atopy were not related to latex sensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with spina bifida, significant and independent risk factors identified for latex sensitization were multiple interventions and higher levels of total serum IgE. A prospective study will clarify the clinical evolution of assymptomatic children sensitized to latex.

Dysfunction of the lower urinary and distal gastrointestinal tracts in pediatric patients with known spinal cord problems

Destruction of the urinary tract in children with elimination, storage, and holding dysfunction of the lower urinary and the distal GI tracts is caused primarily by high intravesical pressure. UTI accelerates this process. The LPP and the status of the urethral control mechanism and its relationship to the detrusor are the primary determinants of intravesical pressure. Intravesical pressures of more than 40 cm H2O are dangerous because they cause a pressure gradient that is transmitted proximally to the renal papillae, which results in the cessation of renal blood flow and a loss of renal function over time. Hydroureteronephrosis, VUR, UTI, urinary incontinence, and calculi formation also may occur. If these dangerously high intravesical pressures remain untreated, renal failure is likely to occur over time. These children then require dialysis or renal transplantation to survive, which is tragic and represents an enormous economic cost to society. Renal failure and upper urinary tract damage is nearly 100% preventable with early and appropriate evaluation and treatment. CIC is a crucial part of the management of these children and has been shown to be safe and effective, even in newborn boys. The use of the Credé maneuver (i.e., manual compression) to empty the bladder is obsolete and should be abandoned. The distal GI tract is inseparable from the lower urinary tract and must be treated simultaneously. Failure to treat the distal GI tract yields poor clinical results and much patient dissatisfaction and makes it difficult or impossible to treat the child's urinary tract problem successfully. Bowel-management programs must include daily high water and fiber intake, together with digital perianal stimulation or fecal extraction. Neuropathic bladder and bowel problems that are intractable to conservative medical and mechanical (i.e., CIC and digital perianal stimulation or fecal extraction, respectively) management almost always can be corrected surgically with high success rates in cooperative patients. Finally, neuropathic bladder and bowel problems can be extremely isolating and debilitating problems. Psychologic counseling and emotional support must be provided as needed. The care that these patients receive must be organized, comprehensive, and correlated with these patients' lifestyles. If these children are evaluated and treated early, they have the potential to live long, healthy, and productive lives.

Latex allergy in pediatric surgery is dependent on repeated operations in the first year of life

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Patients with spina bifida represent the highest risk group for hypersensitivity to latex. Recognized risk factors for these patients are repeated surgery and an atopic disposition. Little is known about children operated on in the first year of life for reasons other than spina bifida.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients (mean age, 10.2 years) with gastrointestinal or urologic surgery were investigated for the number, type, and date of surgical interventions. Additionally, skin prick tests and provocation tests were performed to classify sensitized and symptomatic latex-allergic individuals.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were regarded as sensitized to latex (31.4%). Twenty patients were classified as being atopic (25.6%). Atopic patients were significantly more often sensitized and provocation positive compared with nonsensitized and provocation-negative ones (P <.01). Children already operated on in the first year of life (n = 44) with a positive provocation showed significantly higher latex-specific IgE-values than individuals with a negative outcome (P <.0001). The total number of operations and degree of sensitization showed a significant correlation; more than 8 surgical interventions during the first year of life significantly increased the risk of clinically relevant allergy to latex.

CONCLUSION

This study emphasizes that individuals undergoing surgical interventions during infancy should be handled latex free from the very beginning of life.

Hev b 7 is a Hevea brasiliensis protein associated with latex allergy in children with spina bifida

BACKGROUND

In addition to their disease-associated handicaps, patients with spina bifida (SB) are at high risk of developing latex allergy. Individuals with SB represent a special group of latex-allergic patients, inasmuch as their IgE-binding patterns differ from those of other populations of latex-allergic individuals. Two allergens strongly associated with latex allergy in patients with SB--Hev b 1 and Hev b 3--have already been identified.

OBJECTIVE

We intended to identify a predominant IgE-binding band--in addition to Hev b 1 and 3--at 43 kDa in a study population of 38 latex-allergic (IgE antibodies to latex and symptoms on provocation with latex gloves) and 15 latex-sensitized (IgE antibodies to latex but no symptoms on provocation) children with SB (mean age, 12.3 years) and to determine its frequency of recognition.

METHODS

Sera of latex-sensitized or latex-allergic patients with SB were tested on latex C extract containing natural Hev b 1, Hev b 3, and Hev b 7 and with the recombinant 43-kDa Hev b 7 in immunoblot and inhibition studies.

RESULTS

Natural Hev b 1 was recognized by 82% and natural Hev b 3 by 79% of the latex-allergic children with SB. In addition to some other proteins, 15 (39.5%) of 38 latex-allergic and 2 (13%) of 5 latex-sensitized children with SB revealed IgE binding to a 43-kDa band in the latex protein extract. We identified this 43-kDa IgE-binding band as natural Hev b 7 by immunoblotting and inhibition experiments using recombinant Hev b 7.

CONCLUSION

From these data, we conclude that Hev b 7, the patatin-like Hevea latex protein, is the third SB-associated latex allergen. Future immunotherapy for latex-allergic individuals with SB will have to include Hev b 7 in addition to Hev b 1 and Hev b 3.

Latex hypersensitivity in spinal cord injured adult patients

Latex hypersensitivity is a major cause of anaphylaxis during anaesthesia. Patients with spina bifida, health care or rubber industry workers have been considered at risk for latex sensitization. By analogy, the existence of other at-risk subsets of patients with latex exposure due to frequent surgical procedures has been suggested. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of latex sensitization in a cohort of adult patients with spinal cord injury and repeated latex exposure. Forty-two adult patients with spinal cord injury were studied and retrospectively compared to a group of 30 children with spina bifida evaluated using a similar protocol. Patients were administered a questionnaire concerning history of latex hypersensitivity, atopy, and surgical procedures. Latex sensitivity was investigated by skin prick-tests and latex-specific IgE assay. The search for atopy was based on in vivo and in vitro tests against a panel of environmental allergens. No chronic spinal cord injured patient had a history of latex allergy. When compared with spina bifida, the number of surgical procedures was not statistically different. Although not significantly different, the prevalence of atopy was higher in spina bifida patients. The high level of latex sensitization in spina bifida patients contrasted sharply with the absence of sensitization observed on both skin and in vitro tests in patients with spinal cord injury (P<0.0001). This study confirms that adult patients with chronic neurologic defects resulting from spinal cord injury exhibit a low risk of latex sensitization. These results suggest that considering adult patients with repeated surgical procedures as a group at risk for latex sensitization because of a high degree of latex exposure should be re-examined.

Pediatric neuroanesthesia. Neural tube defects

Neural tube defects of the brain and spinal cord, among the most common birth defects in the United States, cause neurologic morbidity from the lesions themselves and from associated hydrocephalus and Arnold-Chiari malformation. Because the myelomeningoceles, and encephaloceles are repaired surgically within hours of birth, neonatal anesthetic management with attention to fluids, body temperature, intravenous access, and monitoring is important. Anesthesia for treatment of hydrocephalus and Arnold-Chiari malformation takes into consideration the presence of intracranial hypertension and the need for manipulation of vital structures in the posterior fossa.

Latex allergy in children on home mechanical ventilation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Determining the incidence of latex allergy in children receiving home mechanical ventilation.

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of latex allergy in the general population ranges from 0.1 to 1.0%. However, in patients with spina bifida and other chronic medical conditions associated with repeated exposure to latex, the prevalence may be as high as 60%. Children receiving home mechanical ventilation are frequently exposed to latex products. Therefore, we hypothesized that these children would be at increased risk for latex allergy.

DESIGN

Fifty-seven children receiving home mechanical ventilation (31 boys, 26 girls; mean [+/- SD] age, 7.8+/-6.6 years; range, 0.3 to 23.2 years) were enrolled. A radioallergosorbent test (RAST) for latex was administered and serum IgE levels were obtained in all patients.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (29.8%) were found to have a positive RAST for latex. Patients with latex allergy had required mechanical ventilation for an average of 6.1+/-4.1 years vs. 5.5+/-5.4 years (p = 0.69; not significant) in those without latex allergy. Eleven of 17 patients (64.7%) had elevated serum IgE levels in the group with latex allergy vs only 14 of 40 patients (35.0%) in the group with a negative latex RAST (p = 0.04; odds ratio, 3.4).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that there is a high incidence of latex allergy in children requiring home mechanical ventilation. We speculate that screening all children receiving home mechanical ventilation may lead to the identification of patients with previously undiagnosed latex allergy and the prevention of untoward reactions from exposure to latex.

Ventricular shunts and the prevalence of sensitization and clinically relevant allergy to latex in patients with spina bifida

Patients with spina bifida represent the highest-risk group for developing hypersensitivity to latex. Recognized risk factors for these patients are repeated surgery and an atopic disposition. Our aim was to study the influence of a ventricular shunt as an independent risk factor. One hundred and sixty-one patients with spina bifida (median age 10 years) were investigated for the presence of a shunting device and the number, type and date of previous surgical interventions. Additionally, skin-prick tests and provocation tests were performed in order to classify sensitized and symptomatic latex-allergic individuals. Eighty-eight patients (54.7%) were sensitized; 55 (34.2%) were provocation-positive. Patients with a shunt system had undergone a significantly higher number of surgical procedures (p < 0.0001) and showed significantly higher levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-antibodies to latex (p < 0.0001) than patients without a shunting device. The total number of operations correlated significantly with the level of IgE-antibodies to latex in serum (p < 0.0001), whereas the number of shunt operations in patients with a ventricular shunt did not significantly correlate with the degree of sensitization. In conclusion, patients with spina bifida who have a ventricular shunt are at particularly high risk because they undergo a significantly higher number of operations than patients without a ventricular shunt. However, the ventricular shunt does not seem to be an independent risk factor. Furthermore, this study emphasizes that individuals at high risk, such as patients with spina bifida, should be handled latex-free from the very beginning of life.

Characterization of T cell responses to Hev b 3, an allergen associated with latex allergy in spina bifida patients

The prevalence of type I allergy to Hevea brasiliensis latex is particularly high among individuals with frequent exposure such as health care workers and patients with spina bifida (SB). Due to a birth defect of the spinal canal and the resulting neurological and orthopedic defects, these patients require multiple surgeries during childhood. SB patients display a unique pattern of sensitization: IgE-reactivity is preferentially directed against Hev b 3 and Hev b 1, two latex allergens with high sequence similarity. In this study, we analyzed the T cell response to Hev b 3 in latex-allergic SB patients using poly-, oligo-, and monoclonal T lymphocyte cultures. All T cell clones (TCC) were CD3/CD4-positive and expressed the alphabeta TCR. According to their cytokine production pattern (IL-4 vs IFN-gamma), 12 of 21 TCC were classified as Th2-like, 2 of 21 were Th1-like, and 7 of 21 belonged to a Th0-like subset. Using 11 T cell lines and 21 TCC, nine T cell stimulating fragments were determined out of 52 overlapping 12-mer peptides representing the complete amino acid sequence of Hev b 3. Ag presentation of one dominant T cell epitope could be associated with a four-amino acid binding motif (YSTS, position 11-13) in the beta 1 chain of HLA-DR molecules expressed by the respective patients. No reactivity was observed when Hev b 3-reactive T cell lines or TCC were incubated with peptides representing homologous parts of the Hev b 1 molecule, i.e., no cross-reactivity between Hev b 3 and Hev b 1 at the T cell level was evident.