Comparative study of two precision overdenture attachment designs

Effect of abutment angulation in the retention and durability of three overdenture attachment systems: An in vitro study

PURPOSE

This in vitro study investigated and compared the durability and retention of three types of attachments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three commercially available attachments were investigated: Clix®, Dalbo-Plus® and Locator®. In total, 72 samples of these attachments were placed in the acrylic resin forms and subjected to mechanical testing (5400 cycles of insertion and removal) over the respective ball or Locator abutments immersed in artificial saliva at pH 7 and 37℃. The abutments were placed at angulations of 0°, 10° and 20°. The retention force was recorded at the beginning and after 540, 1080, 2160, 3240, 4320 and 5400 insertion-removal cycles.

RESULTS

The results revealed that there were significant differences in the average values of the insertion/removal force due to angulation (F _(2.48) = 343619, P<.05) and the type of attachment (F _(7.48) = 23.220, P<.05).

CONCLUSION

Greater angulation of the abutments was found to influence the retention capacity of the attachments, and the fatigue test simulating 5 years of denture insertion and removal did not produce wear in the metal abutments.

Long-term retention behaviour of resin matrix attachment systems for overdentures

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the long-term retention behaviour of two resin matrix attachment systems for overdentures and the influence of the implant angulation.

METHODS

Sixteen titanium patrices of each attachment system were connected to their corresponding implant analogues and fixed in an auto curing resin either orthogonally (n=8) or 20° tilted (n=8). The corresponding matrices, one made from polyetherketoneketone (PEKK; CM LOC, Cendres+Métaux, Biel, Switzerland), one made from polyethylene (PE; Locator, Zest Anchors, Escondido, California, USA), were fixed in a stylised unilaterally removable dental prosthesis resulting in 4 groups with 8 specimens in each group. Overall, 30,000 joining and separating cycles of the matrix were performed in a chewing simulator. After each joining movement, the unilaterally removable dental prosthesis was loaded eccentrically with 100N at a distance of 12mm from the attachment to simulate clinical loading conditions. Retentive forces were measured during the test using force transducers. The statistical analysis was performed using Tukey-HSD.

RESULTS

Both attachment systems showed a significant decrease in retention over time, which occurred earlier in the tilted groups than in the orthogonal groups. After 5000-30,000 joining and separating cycles the PE matrix attachment provided significantly lower retention than the PEKK matrix attachment system.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this investigation, the combination of a titanium patrix and a matrix made from polyetherketoneketone seems to be a promising material combination for long-term retention, also on tilted implants.

In vitro retention loss of attachment-retained removable partial denture

AIM

To investigate the importance of attachment types on the retention loss of extracoronal attachment-retained removable partial dentures depending on the usage period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In order to observe the retention loss of 5 different attachments (OT Strategy, OT Strategy-metal protected, Vario-stud-snap and Vario-soft 3 and ERA-RV) over time, attachment-retained partial dentures representing Kennedy II mod. I case were placed in a custom-made, retention test machine. For each minute, eight separating and joining movements were performed and retention values (Newton) of the attachments were recorded by computer. The retention tests implemented in 540,1080 and 2160 cycles. The data were evaluated statistically according to the two-way ANOVA and Tukey parametrical tests.

RESULTS

The slide type attachment providing the best retention force was observed to be the most worn out by this process (p < 0.01) while the ball type attachments, which typically have the lesser retention force, showed less retention loss (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that the retention attributes of the attachment-retained dentures were affected by the specific type of precision attachment as well as the usage period.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Precision attachments with ball-type plastic matrices may be recommended for the clinical use due to their retention stability over time.

Comparison of the retentive properties of six prefabricated post overdenture attachment systems

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

There are few research studies concerning prefabricated posts overdenture attachment systems using multiple pull cycles.

PURPOSE

This study tested 6 prefabricated post overdenture attachment systems (AccessPost Overdenture, ERA white and ERA grey, Flexi-Overdenture, O-SO and ZAAG) measured to simulate wear over a 2000 pull cycle and compared the in vitro retention, measured (pounds).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Records of the pounds of force necessary to separate each system were made at the beginning of testing, at pull 10 and then at every 50th pull until the 2000th pull was attained. All pulls were performed manually with a Shimpo force gauge. Absolute force (AF) and relative force (RF) were compared, AF being the force required at any pull to separate the overdenture device, whereas RF is the force required at the first pull.

RESULTS

There was considerable difference of the force required at pull 1 for the ERA white, O-SO and ZAAG anchor systems, then the AccessPost overdenture, and finally the Flexi-Overdenture and ERA grey attachment systems.

CONCLUSION

At pull 2000, there was no statistical difference between any of the attachments studied. The amount of force necessary to offer functional retention to a specific patient wearing an overdenture may vary considerably, depending on the many factors in fabricating the overdenture, and the age, strength, musculature, and the expectations of the patient.

Retention of prefabricated attachments for implant stabilized overdentures in the edentulous mandible: an in vitro study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Bar and stud attachments are widely used to stabilize overdentures on implants in the mandible. There is strong evidence that retention of the attachment is an important factor for a patient's satisfaction.

PURPOSE

This study describes retentive forces and wear of commercially available attachments of 4 implant systems (31, IMZ, Nobel Biocare, ITI Straumann) and 2 magnets (Steco).

METHODS

Forces while removing the keyway portion of an attachment in its path of insertion were measured with a platform load cell. A total of 15,000 removals were performed to simulate fatigue.

RESULTS

Retentive forces ranged between 3 and 85 N. The fatigue test revealed an initial increase of forces with some attachments. After 15,000 cycles, most of the attachments showed little loss of retention compared with the initial retentive forces. It is suggested that conventional fatigue tests with application of axial loads do no simulate clinical fatigue adequately.