Aortic dissection resulting from tear of transverse arch: Is concomitant arch repair warranted?

Current Outcome after Surgery for Type A Aortic Dissection

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of different surgical strategies for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The optimal extent of aortic resection during surgery for acute TAAD is controversial.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent surgery for acute TAAD at 18 European hospitals.

RESULTS

Out of 3902 consecutive patients, 689 (17.7%) died during the index hospitalization. Among 2855 patients who survived 3 months after surgery, 10-year observed survival was 65.3%, while country-adjusted, age-adjusted, and sex-adjusted expected survival was 81.3%, yielding a relative survival of 80.4%. Among 558 propensity score-matched pairs, total aortic arch replacement increased the risk of in-hospital (21.0% vs. 14.9%, P =0.008) and 10-year mortality (47.1% vs. 40.1%, P =0.001), without decreasing the incidence of distal aortic reoperation (10-year: 8.9% vs. 7.4%, P =0.690) compared with ascending aortic replacement. Among 933 propensity score-matched pairs, in-hospital mortality (18.5% vs. 18.0%, P =0.765), late mortality (at 10-year: 44.6% vs. 41.9%, P =0.824), and cumulative incidence of proximal aortic reoperation (at 10-year: 4.4% vs. 5.9%, P =0.190) after aortic root replacement was comparable to supracoronary aortic replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Replacement of the aortic root and aortic arch did not decrease the risk of aortic reoperation in patients with TAAD and should be performed only in the presence of local aortic injury or aneurysm. The relative survival of TAAD patients is poor and suggests that the causes underlying aortic dissection may also impact late mortality despite surgical repair of the dissected aorta.

Limited Distal Repair Results in Low Rates of Distal Events Following Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

To investigate mortality and reoperation rates following limited distal repair after acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) at a single medium volume institution. We analyzed all patients that underwent limited distal repair (ascending aortic or hemiarch replacement) following ATAAD between January 1998 and April 2020 at our institution. During the study period, 489 patients underwent ATAAD surgery, of which 457 (94%) underwent limited distal repair with a 30-day mortality of 12.9%. Among 30-day survivors, late follow-up was 97.7% complete with a mean follow-up of 6.0 ± 5.5 years. In all, 50 patients (11%) required a reoperation during the study period at a mean of 3.4 ± 3.4 years after initial repair, with a 30-day mortality of 12%. An aortic reoperation was required in 4.1 (2.0-6.1)%, 10.3 (7.1-13.6)%, 15.1 (10.9-19.4)%, and 18.0 (13.0-22.9)% of patients at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years. A distal reoperation was required in 3.0 (1.2-4.7)%, 8.0 (5.1-10.9)%, 10.3 (6.8-13.8)%, and 12.4 (8.2-16.5)% of patients and 4.4 (2.3-6.4)%, 10.4 (7.1-13.7)%, 13.9 (9.8-18.0)%, and 16.9 (12.0-21.9)% of patents had a distal event at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Limited distal repair with an ascending aortic or hemiarch replacement was associated with acceptable survival and rates of reoperations and distal events. Limited distal repair is a safe and feasible standard approach to ATAAD surgery at a medium-volume center.

Combined surgical and endovascular treatment with arch preservation of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

DeBakey type I aortic dissection is a catastrophic event that presents a formidable challenge to cardiovascular surgeon. Here, we evaluate a new combined surgical and endovascular technique for acute condition.

METHODS

Between December 2011 and December 2015, 12 patients with type I aortic dissection concomitant involving supra-aortic vessels underwent ascending aortic replacement and simultaneous stent grafts inserted into the descending aorta, left subclavian, and left carotid arteries, and into the innominate artery when possible, without arch replacement. The stent grafts, Gore TAG thoracic endoprosthesis and Viabahn, were deployed under visual guidance through opened aortic arch into the true lumen, with the techniques of circulatory arrest, moderate hypothermia, and bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion.

RESULTS

Operation was performed smoothly in all patients. There was one death, and the other 11 recovered without any neurological deficits. Follow-up computed tomography scans showed that the true lumen expanded and false lumen regressed in both arch and descending aortic segments in 1 year. The diameter did not increase in either arch or descending aortic segments.

CONCLUSION

Ascending aortic replacement and stent graft for supra-aortic arteries and the descending aorta without arch replacement are feasible options for type I aortic dissection with satisfactory short-term aortic remodeling.

Relationship between the extent of aortic replacement and stent graft for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection and outcomes: Results from a medical center in Taiwan

Background

Total arch replacement (TAR) and/or stent graft implantation has been proposed as the primary surgical treatment for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection. However, the suggestion was based on excellent outcomes of high-volume or aortic centers. How about the real results in most places around the world? The purpose of this study was intended to compared in-hospital mortality, major complications, and aortic remodeling between TAR and/or stent graft implantation in a medical center of northern Taiwan.

Methods

Between January 2008 and August 2017, 156 patients with acute type I aortic dissection underwent surgery at our institution, including proximal aortic replacement only (Group I, n = 72), concomitant TAR (Group II, n = 23), concomitant TAR extended with stent grafting (Group III, n = 45), and proximal aortic replacement with descending aortic stent grafting (Group IV, n = 16).

Results

No significant differences were found in underlying disease and preoperative presentations, including operative risk among four groups. Overall in-hospital mortality was 22.4% (13 patients in Group I, 9 in Group II, 12 in Group III, and 1 in Group IV). New-onset stroke occurred in 15 patients postoperatively (3 patients [5.2%] in Group I, 3 [21.4%] in Group II, and 9 [26.5%] in Group III after excluding 36 patients with documented preoperative cerebrovascular accident or cerebral malperfusion). Root reconstruction and TAR were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. TAR was significantly associated with surgery-related stroke. Compared to those in Group I, true lumen expansion and false lumen shrinkage during 1-year aortic remodeling were significantly higher in Groups III and IV. Both TAR and descending aorta stent grafting were significantly associated with decreased risk of patent false lumen.

Conclusions

Proximal aortic replacement remains the preferred surgical strategy for acute type I aortic dissection, with lower mortality and neurological complications. Proximal descending aorta stent grafting may benefit aortic remodeling, even without TAR.

A History of Thoracic Aortic Surgery

Ancient historical texts describe the presence of aortic pathology conditions, although the surgical treatment of thoracic aortic disease remained insurmountable until the 19th century. Surgical treatment of thoracic aortic disease then progressed along with advances in surgical technique, conduit production, cardiopulmonary bypass, and endovascular technology. Despite radical advances in aortic surgery, principles established by surgical pioneers of the 19th century hold firm to this day.

Outcomes of Acute Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection With an Entry Tear in Descending Aorta

Background—

Optimal management strategy of acute aortic dissection (AD) with retrograde extension from entry tear in the descending aorta into the ascending aorta remains undetermined.

Methods and Results—

Of the 538 patients who were diagnosed as having acute AD from 1999 through 2011, 49 patients (37 men; 52.5±13.1 years) were identified as having entry tear in the descending aorta with retrograde extension of AD into the ascending aorta. Sixteen patients who were clinically stable with thrombosed false lumen in the ascending aorta were treated medically (MED group), whereas 33 patients underwent aortic replacement (SURG group) on an intention-to-treat basis. In the MED group, 1 patient was converted to urgent aortic surgery and 2 patients underwent endovascular stent grafting in the descending aorta during the initial hospitalization. The early (30-day or in-hospital) mortality rates were 0% and 9.1% in the MED and SURG group, respectively ( P =0.54). Follow-up was complete in all patients (median, 61.4 months; Q1–Q3, 28.2–99.1 months). The 5-year 100% survival rate in the MED group was higher than that in the SURG group (81.2±7.0%; P =0.080), in the surgically treated patients with antegrade type A AD (74.5±2.8%; P =0.038), and in the patients with type B AD (75.3±3.3%; P =0.045). Aortic event–free survival at 5 years was 52.7±14.8% and 69.6±8.0% in the MED and SURG groups, respectively ( P =0.98).

Conclusions—

Patients with acute retrograde type A AD showed a more favorable prognosis than patients with antegrade AD. In selected patients with retrograde type A AD, excellent outcomes could be achieved with initial medical management combined with timely interventions.

Repair of acute type A aortic dissection: results in 100 patients

To determine short- and long-term outcomes after repair of type A aortic dissection, we reviewed data of 100 consecutive patients (64 men; mean age, 63 ± 12.2 years) who underwent acute type A aortic dissection repair between January 2000 and June 2008. They were divided into group A, open anastomosis (circulatory arrest; n = 59) and group B, closed anastomosis (no circulatory arrest; n = 41). Aortic valve re-suspension or replacement was performed in 77 patients, aortic root replacement in 29, and aortic arch procedures in 31. The median follow-up was 2.8 years (range, 0-8.6 years). The 30-day mortality was 14%; 16.9% in group A and 9.8% in group B. None of the 23 variables analyzed to determine predictors of death or stroke was significant on multivariate analysis. Postoperatively, there was no difference between the 2 groups with respect to stroke, sepsis, renal failure, multiorgan failure, or reoperation. Overall actuarial survival at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Considerable morbidity is still associated with repair of type A aortic dissection, despite a significant improvement in mortality.

Evidence, lack of evidence, controversy, and debate in the provision and performance of the surgery of acute type A aortic dissection

Acute type A aortic dissection is a lethal condition requiring emergency surgery. It has diverse presentations, and the diagnosis can be missed or delayed. Once diagnosed, decisions with regard to initial management, transfer, appropriateness of surgery, timing of operation, and intervention for malperfusion complications are necessary. The goals of surgery are to save life by prevention of pericardial tamponade or intra-pericardial aortic rupture, to resect the primary entry tear, to correct or prevent any malperfusion and aortic valve regurgitation, and if possible to prevent late dissection-related complications in the proximal and downstream aorta. No randomized trials of treatment or techniques have ever been performed, and novel therapies-particularly with regard to extent of surgery-are being devised and implemented, but their role needs to be defined. Overall, except in highly specialized centers, surgical outcomes might be static, and there is abundant room for improvement. By highlighting difficulties and controversies in diagnosis, patient selection, and surgical therapy, our over-arching goal should be to enfranchise more patients for treatment and improve surgical outcomes.

Acute Type B Aortic Dissection: Does Aortic Arch Involvement Affect Management and Outcomes?: Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD)

BACKGROUND

Stanford Type B acute aortic dissection (TB-AAD) spares the ascending aorta and is optimally managed with medical therapy in the absence of complications. However, the treatment of TB-AAD with aortic arch involvement (AAI) remains an unresolved issue.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined 498 patients with TB-AAD enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) between 1996 and 2003. Kaplan-Meier mortality curves were constructed and multivariate regression models were performed to identify independent predictors of AAI and to evaluate whether AAI was an independent predictor of follow-up mortality. We found that 371 (74.5%) patients with TB-AAD did not have AAI versus 127 (25.5%) with AAI. Independent predictors of AAI were a history of previous aortic surgery (OR 3.4; 95% CI, 1.6 to 7.6; P=0.002), absence of back pain (OR 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.5; P=0.05), and any pulse deficit (1.9; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.3, P=0.03). Mortality for patients without AAI was 9.4%+/-4.3% and 21.0%+/-6.9% at 1 and 3 years versus 9.2%+/-7.7% and 19.9%+/-11.1% with AAI, respectively (mean follow-up overall, 2.3 years, log rank P=0.82). AAI was not an independent predictor of long-term mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with TB-AAD and aortic arch involvement do not differ with regards to mortality at 3 years. Whether or not AAI involvement impacts other measures of morbidity such as freedom from operation or endovascular intervention deserves further study.

Should the transverse aortic arch be replaced simultaneously with aortic root replacement for annuloaortic ectasia in marfan syndrome?

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine, on the basis of the late fate of the intact aortic arch with abnormal tissue after aortic root replacement, whether the intact aortic arch should be replaced prophylactically at the time of aortic root replacement for annuloaortic ectasia in Marfan syndrome.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed in 85 patients with Marfan syndrome who underwent aortic root replacement for annuloaortic ectasia with or without aortic dissection (mean age 37 years, range 19-61 years). These 85 patients were divided into four groups according to the postoperative condition of the residual aorta. In group I (n = 47), the patients underwent aortic root replacement for annuloaortic ectasia with or without localized dissection in the ascending aorta. In these patients the residual aorta, including the aortic arch, was therefore intact. In group II (n = 10), the aortic arch was intact, although the descending thoracic aorta was dissected because of the preoperative type B dissection. In groups III and IV, the patients had type A dissection involving the transverse arch associated with annuloaortic ectasia. In group III (n = 13), residual dissection existed in the descending thoracic aorta after concomitant total arch replacement. In group IV (n = 15), the aortic arch and the descending thoracic aorta were dissected.

RESULTS

There were 5 early deaths (3 in group I, 1 in group II, and 1 in group III). Subsequent operations were required in 10, 5, 6, and 7 cases in groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Regarding the aortic arch, only 2 of 53 survivors of the initial hospitalization with an intact aortic arch (groups I and II) underwent subsequent total arch replacement for the onset of dissection in the aortic arch, and 4 of 14 survivors of the initial hospitalization with a residual dissecting arch (group III) needed subsequent total arch replacement. Actuarial freedom from arch repair among patients with an intact aortic arch (91% at 15 years) was significantly higher than that among patients with a residual dissecting arch (49% at 15 years, P =.0078).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of new dissection in the residual intact arch after aortic root replacement was extremely low. Therefore prophylactic replacement of the intact arch does not appear to be necessary at aortic root replacement for annuloaortic ectasia in Marfan syndrome.

Routine extended graft replacement for an acute type A aortic dissection and the patency of the residual false channel

BACKGROUND

Recent surgical progress has had an impact on the mortality of acute type A aortic dissection. Routine aortic arch replacement, irrespective of the location of the intimal tears, may improve not only the outcome of the residual dissection but the operative mortality, because complete resection of intimal tears, including those invisible through the aortotomy in the ascending aorta is achieved.

METHODS

During the past 7 years, total aortic arch replacement was performed in 50 consecutive patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Cerebral protection was achieved by deep hypothermia associated with pharmacologic cerebroplegia. Computed tomography and aortic angiography were performed to examine 48 patients for the possible presence of residual false channels before discharge.

RESULTS

The duration of circulatory arrest ranged from 30 to 84 minutes. The hospital mortality was 10%, and a cerebral complication was observed in 1 patient. No evidence of a persisting false channel was detected in 27 patients (54%) who were totally thrombosed. During the follow-up period (range: 2 months to 7 years), 2 patients died of hepatoma or pneumonia, respectively, and 2 patients underwent reoperation for recurrence of a dissection at the sinus of Valsalva. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated a 7-year survival of 82%, and a 7-year freedom from reoperation of 93%.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that our aggressive use of routine aortic arch grafting can be accomplished with an acceptable risk and that our strategy not only improved the late results but the mortality associated with repairs for acute type A aortic dissection.

Is extended arch replacement for acute type a aortic dissection an additional risk factor for mortality?

BACKGROUND

We report our experience with surgery for acute type A aortic dissection with involvement of the aortic arch.

METHODS

From January 1986 to December 2001, 277 patients underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. In 70 patients (25.3%), surgery was extended into the aortic arch: hemiarch and total arch replacement in 53 (75.7%) and 17 (24.3%) patients, respectively. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was used in 19 patients, antegrade selective cerebral perfusion in 38, and combined deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with antegrade selective cerebral perfusion in 13.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 18.6% (13/70) after extended replacement into the arch versus 21.7% (45/207) after surgery limited to the ascending aorta (p = 0.62). Multivariate analysis did not reveal significant risk factors for operative mortality. Postoperatively, 5 patients (8.1%) had a new postoperative cerebral vascular accident (CVA). Multivariate analysis showed an earlier date of operation as the only independent determinant for a new postoperative CVA (p = 0.0162, RR = 0.80/year, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.96). None of the patients, operated on with antegrade selective cerebral perfusion, had a new cerebral deficit. Comparing the different methods of cerebral protection, multivariate risk analysis revealed antegrade selective cerebral perfusion as a significant protective factor against new postoperative CVA (p = 0.0110, OR = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.61). Survival at 5 and 10 years was 66.6.5% and 40.0%, respectively, after replacement of the aortic arch versus 68.7% and 57.7%, respectively, after replacement of the ascending aorta (p = 0.96). Freedom from aortic arch reoperation was 96.3% at 5 and 77.0% at 10 years versus 86.6% and 75.1% in both groups, respectively (p = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Extended replacement into the aortic arch during surgery for acute type A dissection does not influence early and late results. The best cerebral protection seems to be obtained with antegrade selective cerebral perfusion.

Prognosis of retrograde dissection from the descending to the ascending aorta

BACKGROUND

Natural history of aortic dissection (AD) with intimal tear in the descending or abdominal aorta and retrograde extension into the ascending aorta (retrograde AD) remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to elucidate medium-term prognosis of patients with retrograde AD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Study population consisted of 109 patients with acute type A AD. There were 27 patients (25%) with retrograde AD and 82 patients (75%) with intimal tear in the ascending aorta (antegrade AD). In antegrade AD patients, 60 patients underwent surgery and 22 patients were treated medically. In retrograde AD patients, 14 patients showed localized crescentic high attenuation area along the ascending aortic wall without enhancement in computed tomography. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed complete thrombosis of false lumen (FL) in the ascending aorta (retrograde thrombosed). The remaining 13 patients showed incomplete or no thrombosis (retrograde nonthrombosed). All retrograde nonthrombosed AD patients underwent surgery except for 1 patient with stroke, whereas all retrograde thrombosed AD patients were treated medically. In-hospital mortality rate of retrograde AD patients was significantly lower than that of antegrade AD patients (15% versus 38%, P=0.027). The survival rates in retrograde AD patients were all 85% at 1, 2, and 5 years, which were significantly higher than those of antegrade AD patients (63%, 62%, and 57%, respectively)(P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with type A retrograde AD have better medium-term prognosis than patients with antegrade AD. Retrograde AD patients with thrombosed FL in the ascending aorta could be treated medically with timed surgical repair.

Surgical treatment of acute arch dissection

OBJECTIVES

Acute type A arch dissections are rare and no consensus has been reached on their surgical treatment. We studied perioperative risk factors for mortality in arch dissection patients.

METHODS

Between October 1995 and October 2001, 108 patients with acute type A dissection were operated on, of whom 16 had acute arch dissections. Their mean age was 58 +/- 9 (44-77). Surgery involved total arch replacement in 4, hemiarch replacement in 10, and intimal tear repair with pledgeted sutures and ascending aortic replacement in 2.

RESULTS

One patient who underwent total arch replacement died intraoperatively due to bleeding. Both patients who underwent ascending aortic replacement and primary repair of arch tears died 2 days postoperatively, 1 due to bleeding, and the other due to multiorgan failure. In-hospital mortality was thus 18.75%, or 3 of 16. All 3 had cardiac tamponade preoperatively. The 13 survivors were discharged after a mean hospital stay of 11 +/- 6 days. Mean follow-up was 38 +/- 25 months, from 3 months to 6 years. One patient died due to graft infection 3 months postoperatively, but the remaining 12 remain in good condition. Univariate predictors of in-hospital mortality were the type of surgery (primary intimal tear repair) (p = 0.027) and preoperative cardiac tamponade (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of acute type A-arch dissections can be done with reasonable mortality and mid-term survival comparable with those of other subgroups with acute type A dissection. As with series of arch dissections, our patient population is too small to draw specific conclusions, but our experience leads us to conclude that the sites of intimal tears should be resected in acute type A arch dissection.

Surgery for acute type A dissection using antegrade selective cerebral perfusion: experience with 122 patients

BACKGROUND

Antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (ASCP) has proved to be a reliable method of brain protection during surgery of the thoracic aorta, but its use during aortic dissection surgery still remains controversial. In this study, we present our results after the operative repair of acute type A aortic dissections using ASCP and moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest.

METHODS

Between October 1995 and August 2001, 122 patients (76 men, 46 women) underwent repair of acute type A aortic dissection with the aid of ASCP and open distal anastomosis. The average age of the patients was 61 +/- 12 (mean +/- standard deviation). Preoperative complications included cardiac tamponade (n = 34; 27.0%), aortic regurgitation (n = 27; 22.1%), and new neurological deficits (n = 11; 9%).

RESULTS

Stepwise logistic regression revealed preoperative cardiac tamponade (p = 0.018) and new neurological deficits (p = 0.017) to be independent determinants for hospital mortality (19.7%). Permanent neurological complications occurred in 7% of the patients. Independent risk factors for temporary neurological dysfunction (11.2%) included cardiac tamponade (p = 0.019) and preoperative neurological deficits (p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, the surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection with the aid of ASCP was associated with acceptable hospital mortality and neurologic morbidity rates.

Is extended aortic replacement in acute type A dissection justifiable?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of our surgical strategy for acute aortic dissection based on the extent of the dissection and the site of the entry, with special emphasis on resection of all dissected aortic segments if technically possible.

METHODS

Between January 1995 and March 2001, 43 consecutive patients underwent operations for acute aortic dissection. In all patients the distal repair was performed under circulatory arrest without the use of an aortic cross-clamp. Fifteen patients underwent aortic arch replacement with additional reconstruction of supra-aortic vessels in 3 patients. Complete replacement of all dissected tissue could be achieved in 21 patients (group 1). Because of the distal extent of the dissection beyond the aortic arch, replacement of all the dissected tissue was not possible in 22 patients (group 2).

RESULTS

Early mortality was 4.7% (2 patients), and the incidence of perioperative cerebrovascular events was 7.0% (3 patients). All of these events occurred in group 2 (p < 0.025). During the follow-up period of 6 years or less, 5 patients died, all from causes not related to the aorta or the aortic valve. A persisting patent false lumen was observed in 14 of the 36 surviving patients (39%).

CONCLUSIONS

Extended replacement of the dissected ascending aorta and aortic arch can be done with good early and midterm results, even though it requires a complex surgical technique. Therefore we advocate complete replacement of the dissected parts of the aorta in all patients in whom this is technically possible.

Surgical results of hemiarch replacement for acute type A dissection

BACKGROUND

The appropriate surgical strategy for patients with an arch tear in acute type A dissection remains controversial. We retrospectively compared surgical results after hemiarch as compared with transverse aortic arch replacement in patients with an arch tear in acute type A dissection.

METHODS

The records of 88 patients who consecutively underwent graft replacement for acute type A dissection between 1989 and 2001 were reviewed. The patients were divided into three groups: patients with ascending aortic replacement (group AS, n = 41), those with hemiarch replacement (group HA, n = 23), and those with transverse arch replacement (group AR, n = 24). Operative mortality and morbidity and late outcome were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

The overall early (30 day) mortality was 11.3% (10/88), and in-hospital mortality was 14.7% (13/88). In-hospital mortality in groups AS, HA, and AR were 7.3%, 8.6%, and 33.3%, respectively (p = 0.011). Cardiopulmonary bypass, circulatory arrest, and operation times were significantly shorter in group HA than in group AR (p < 0.001). A smaller amount of intraoperative transfusion of red blood cells (p = 0.0006) and fresh-frozen plasma (p = 0.0003) was needed in group HA than in group AR, and postoperative bleeding during the first 24 hours postoperatively was significantly less in group HA than in group AR (p = 0.0028). The incidence of postoperative coma did not differ among the three groups (p = 0.89), nor did the incidence of postoperative patent false channel in the descending thoracic aorta (p = 0.57). Actuarial survival rates after 5 years were significantly better in group HA (91.3% +/- 5.9%) than in group AR (44.4% +/- 14.3%, p = 0.018). Freedom from reoperation on the distal aorta within 5 years did not differ among the groups (p = 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemiarch replacement for acute type A dissection demonstrated favorable early and late outcome. The extent of graft replacement influenced surgical mortality and morbidity. Whenever the intimal tear is located in the lesser curvature of the transverse arch, hemiarch replacement is recommended to improve overall operative mortality and morbidity.

Is medical therapy still the optimal treatment strategy for patients with acute type B aortic dissections?

OBJECTIVE

The optimal treatment of patients with acute type B dissections continues to be debated.

METHODS

A 36-year clinical experience of medical and surgical treatments in 189 patients was retrospectively analyzed (multivariable Cox proportional hazards model) with respect to three outcome end points: all deaths, freedom from reoperation, and freedom from late aortic complications or death. Propensity score analysis identified 2 quintiles (quintiles I and II, consisting of 142 comparable patients) for further comparison of the effects of surgical versus medical treatment.

RESULTS

Shock (hazard ratio 14.5, 95% confidence interval 4.7-44.5, P <.001) and visceral ischemia (hazard ratio 10.9, 95% confidence interval 3.9-30.3, P <.001) largely predominated as determinants of death, along with 6 other risk factors (arch involvement, rupture, stroke, previous sternotomy, and coronary or lung disease), which roughly doubled the hazard of death. Female sex was a significant but weaker predictor of death. Renal dysfunction, year of presentation, age, and mode of therapy (medical vs surgical) had no important bearing on overall survival. The actuarial survival estimates for all patients were 71%, 60%, 35%, and 17% at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, and were similar for the medical and surgical patients. Reoperation and late aortic complications were predicted by the presence of Marfan syndrome. For the propensity-matched patients in quintiles I and II, survival, freedom from reoperation, and freedom from aortic complications were almost identical in the medically treated and surgical subsets.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis for patients with acute type B aortic dissection is bleak and determined primarily by dissection-related and patient-specific risk factors, which do not appear to be readily modifiable.

Does Profound Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest Improve Survival in Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection?

Objective No evidence exists that profound hypothermic circulatory arrest (PHCA) improves survival or reduces the likelihood of distal aortic reoperation in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

Methods Records of 307 patients with acute type A aortic dissection from 1967 to 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. The influence of repair using PHCA (n=121) versus without PHCA (n=186) on death and freedom from distal aortic reoperation was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression models. Propensity score analysis identified a subset of 152 comparable patients in 3 quintiles (QIII–V) in which the effects of PHCA (n=113) versus no PHCA (n=39) were further compared.

Results For all patients, 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year survival estimates were 81±2%, 74±3%, and 63±3% (±1 SE). Survival rates and actual freedom from distal aortic reoperation was not significantly different between treatment methods in the entire patient cohort nor in the matched patients in quintiles III–V. Treatment method was not associated with differences in early major complications, late survival, or distal aortic reoperation rates in the entire patient sample or in quintiles III–V.

Conclusions Aortic repair with or without circulatory arrest was associated with comparable early complications, survival, and distal aortic reoperation rates in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Despite the lack of concrete evidence favoring the use of PHCA, it does no harm, and most of our group uses PHCA regularly because of its practical technical advantages and theoretical potential merit.

The results of total arch graft implantation with open stent-graft placement for type A aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

One problem that conventional ascending treatment for type A aortic dissection has not satisfactorily resolved is chronic enlargement of residual dissection in the aortic arch and descending aorta. To address this problem, we have developed a new method for type A aortic dissection: total arch graft implantation with open-style stent-graft placement.

METHODS

From October 1994 through October 1999, 19 patients with type A aortic dissection (13 acute and 6 chronic dissections) underwent total arch graft implantation with open-style stent-graft placement. After achievement of general anesthesia and hypothermic extracorporeal circulation, we replaced the dissected ascending aorta and neck vessels with a 4-branched graft and repaired the descending aorta with a stent graft to close the entry site completely and to obtain better peripheral perfusion. We then examined the acute-phase and chronic-phase results and the outcomes of the false lumen and dissected aorta.

RESULTS

There were 1 (5.3%) hospital death and 2 late deaths. The survivals at 1 and 3 years were 89.5% and 82.6%, respectively. The following complications occurred in the perioperative period: 1 stroke, 2 cases of temporary paraparesis, 2 cases of temporary hemodialysis, and 3 cases of mediastinitis. No pulmonary complications were observed. Six months postoperatively, the targeted entry sites were completely closed in all cases, 80% (8/10) of preoperatively patent false lumina were clotted at the level of the end of the stent graft, and 60% (9/15) of the false lumina and 40% (6/15) of the dissected aorta had shrunk significantly. Two (13.3%) of 15 cases of postoperative dilatation in the dissected aorta were observed, and reoperation related to residual dissected aorta was performed in only 1 (1/17 [5.9%]) patient during the mean follow-up period of 2.4 +/- 1.6 years.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary review of the total arch graft implantation with a stent graft suggests that this new procedure for type A aortic dissection might provide better results in both the acute and the chronic phase, especially with regard to the outcome for the false lumen and dissected aorta.

Does the extent of proximal or distal resection influence outcome for type A dissections?

BACKGROUND

The extent of proximal and distal aortic resection that should be performed for acute type A aortic dissections remains controversial.

METHODS

From 1984 to 1999, 119 patients underwent repair of an acute type A dissection. Distal resection was to the ascending aorta in 78 (66%) and hemiarch in 41 (34%) patients. Proximally, the aortic valve was preserved in 69 (58%) patients, 40 (34%) underwent composite valve grafting, and 10 (8%) underwent separate graft and valve replacement.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was higher for separate graft and valve (50%+/-16%) than for valve preservation (16%+/-5%) or composite grafts (20%+/-7%) (p < 0.05). Hemiarch replacement did not increase operative risk compared to distal reconstruction to the ascending aorta (17%+/-6% versus 22%+/-5%, p > 0.71). At 10 years, freedom from reoperation was 81%+/-7% and long-term survival was 60%+/-8%, but neither was related to the proximal or distal surgical technique (p > 0.15). Risk factors for late reoperation included a nonresected primary tear and Marfan syndrome (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

An aggressive surgical approach, including a full root or hemiarch replacement, is not associated with increased operative risk and should be considered when type A dissections extensively involve the valve, sinuses, or arch.

Long-term effectiveness of operations for ascending aortic dissections

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term effectiveness of a strategy for managing the aortic root and distal aorta according to the pathology in ascending aortic dissection.

METHODS

From 1978 to 1995, 208 patients underwent operations for acute (n = 135) and chronic (n = 73) ascending aortic dissection. Surgical strategies included valve resuspension with supracoronary aortic root repair and ascending aortic graft for normal sinuses and valve (n = 135), composite valve and ascending aortic graft for abnormal sinuses and valve (n = 47), and valve replacement and supracoronary ascending aortic graft for normal sinuses and abnormal valve (n = 26). Resection extended into the arch only if the intimal tear originated in or extended to the aortic arch (n = 31).

RESULTS

Hospital mortality was 14%. Cardiogenic shock (P =.002) and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (P =.001) were associated with increased risk; use of circulatory arrest (P =.0003) decreased risk. Survival was 87%, 68%, and 52% at 30 days, 5 years, and 10 years, respectively. Advanced age, earlier date of operation, composite graft, and arch resection were associated with decreased survival; residual distal dissected aorta was not. Reoperation was required for 5 proximal and 8 distal problems.

CONCLUSIONS

In both acute and chronic ascending aortic dissections, (1) circulatory arrest is associated with low early mortality; (2) with normal sinuses and valve, supracoronary repair of the dissected aortic root and valve resuspension is effective long term; and (3) residual distal dissected aorta does not decrease late survival and has a low risk of aneurysmal change and reoperation for at least 10 years.

Extended total arch replacement for acute type a aortic dissection: experience with seventy patients

OBJECTIVE

We sought to report the clinical experience with extended total arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection and to determine the factors that influence early mortality, late survival, and late reoperation.

METHODS

Between December 1988 and August 1998, 70 patients underwent emergency graft replacement of both the ascending aorta and the total aortic arch for acute type A aortic dissection. All operations were performed with hypothermic extracorporeal circulation, selective cerebral perfusion for cerebral protection during aortic arch repair, and open distal anastomosis. Concomitant procedures included aortic valve resuspension in 18 patients, composite graft replacement in 10 patients, and coronary artery bypass grafting in 5 patients.

RESULTS

The early mortality rate was 16% (11 of 70 patients). Multivariable analysis showed that renal-mesenteric ischemia and coronary artery bypass grafting were independent determinants for early death. Survival rates at 3 and 5 years postoperatively, including the early deaths, were 75% +/- 5% and 73% +/- 6%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that renal-mesenteric ischemia and en bloc repair were independent determinants for late death. Freedom from reoperation was 91% +/- 4% and 77% +/- 8% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that anastomotic leakage was the only significant determinant for late reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended total arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection could be justified in properly selected patients.

Repair of an acute type A dissection: fate of the remnant false lumen and preserved aortic valve

From January 1992 through March 1997, 75 patients (DeBakey type I/II = 56/19) underwent a surgical repair of a type A acute dissection. The patients included 37 men and 38 women ranging in age from 23 to 83 years with a mean of 65 years. All patients were admitted to our hospital with a mean interval of 2.2 days from the episode of onset. The overall hospital mortality rate was 25% (19/75). There were three late deaths among the 56 patients discharged from the hospital. The actuarial survival rate for the patients surviving the operation was 87% at 5 years after repair. A subsequent aortic operation was necessary in 6 patients, while 3 other patients who had late aortic complications were put on medical therapy alone. As a result, the aortic event-free survival rate was 54% at 5 years. For a type I dissection the false lumen was completely thrombosed after repair in 34%. The descending thoracic aorta with a patent false lumen was markedly enlarged in proportion to the follow-up time. After a conservative approach to the aortic valve, all but one patient demonstrated an adequate valve function throughout this study period. This experience with a midterm follow-up showed an acceptable durability of the preserved aortic valve and a progressive enlargement of the persistent false lumen with a high rate of aortic complications. Hence, all patients with a type A dissection need a close follow-up to assess the aorta for complications of either recurrent or residual aneurysms and dissections.

Comparative clinical study between retrograde cerebral perfusion and selective cerebral perfusion in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

Selection of a brain protection method is a primary concern for aortic arch surgery. We performed a retrospective study to compare the respective advantages and disadvantages of retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) and selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) in patients who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.

METHODS

The study reviewed 166 patients who underwent surgery at Nagoya University or its eight branch hospitals between January 1990 and August 1996. There were 91 patients who received SCP and 75 patients who underwent RCP. Results for these two groups were compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, gender, Marfan syndrome rate, DeBakey classification, or emergency operation rate. Rates of various preoperative complications were similar except for aortic valve regurgitation. Arch replacement was performed more often in SCP than in RCP patients (49% vs. 27%, P = 0.0028). There were no significant differences between groups in cardiac ischemic time or visceral organ ischemic time. However, RCP group showed shorter cardio-pulmonary bypass time (297+/-99 vs. 269+/-112 min, P = 0.013) and lower the lowest core temperature (21.6+/-3.1 degrees C vs. 18.7+/-2.1 degrees C, P = 0.0001). SCP duration was longer than RCP duration (103+/-56 vs. 54+/-24 min, P < 0.0001). Despite these differences, RCP patients were not significantly different from SCP patients with regard to any postoperative complication, neurological dysfunction (16 vs. 19%), or operative mortality (all deaths within the hospitalization; 24 vs. 21%). Regarding neurologic dysfunction, there were six cases of coma, six of motor paralysis, two of paraplegia and one of visual loss among SCP patients, and eight cases of coma, three of motor paralysis, and three of convulsion in the RCP group. The incidence of motor paralysis was higher in the SCP group, while the incidence of coma was higher in the RCP group.

CONCLUSIONS

RCP can be performed without clamping or cannulation of the cervical arteries, which is an advantage in reducing the chances of arterial injury or cerebral embolization. RCP is comparable to SCP in terms of clinical outcome.

Early and late risk factors in surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Morbidity and mortality of emergency repair of type A dissecting aneurysms of the aorta are high. This is an attempt to investigate the risk determinants of early and late results.

METHODS

A series of preoperative and operative variables were retrospectively collected from the clinical records of 291 patients operated on between January 1, 1979, and December 31, 1995. Risk factors for surgical death were investigated with univariate analysis and stepwise logistic regression. Follow-up was conducted between December 1995 and February 1996. Analysis of late results was conducted by means of actuarial survival curves (life method). After removing the surgical deaths, risk factors for late deaths were analyzed by a Cox model.

RESULTS

The in-hospital mortality rate was 36.1%. Significant independent determinants of operative or early death were preoperative shock, preoperative neurologic impairment, operation before 1986, perioperative bleeding, and prolonged clamping time. The 10-year survival rate was 36.9% +/- 4.4%. Twenty-six patients required repeat operation. The long-term prognosis was significantly worse in patients who needed reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Growing awareness of this disease and quicker diagnosis have increased the number of patients with acute dissection of the ascending aorta who are taken early to operation. This new challenge must be met by better preoperative support and intraoperative monitoring, and by surgical techniques that focus on lowering the rate of late complications, for which lifelong follow-up must be provided.

Surgical treatment for acute aortic arch dissection

Between March 1983 and December 1993, 24 consecutive patients with acute aortic dissection resulting from a tear located in the aortic arch or at the base of the innominate artery underwent surgical treatment. Before 1988, 11 patients (group 1) underwent either isolated ascending aorta replacement (eight cases) or composite graft replacement (three) by the conventional method. In this group, the hospital mortality rate was 36.4%; two of seven surviving patients required reoperation for aortic arch. After 1989, 13 patients (group 2) underwent either hemiarch replacement (five cases), total arch replacement (three), extended ascending aortic replacement or composite graft replacement with hemiarch replacement (one) under a brief period of circulatory arrest (mean 33.3 min) at a mean(range) rectal temperature of 20.8(18-23) degrees C by open distal anastomosis. The operative mortality rate in group 2 was 15.4%. Ten of 13 surviving patients are free from reoperation (mean follow-up 40 months). In most patients with acute type A dissection in which the tear is located at the proximal aortic arch or at the base of the innominate artery, the use of an open technique during a brief period of hypothermic circulatory arrest is advocated to: (1) perform a more secure distal anastomosis; (2) provide a more accurate assessment and resection of intimal disruption; and (3) avoid further aortic injury from the cross-clamp.

Surgical management of aortic dissection during a 30-year period

BACKGROUND

Certain recent studies have demonstrated improved surgical outcome in patients with aortic dissection. We analyzed the surgical survival rates of patients with acute aortic dissections and the late prognosis of those with aortic dissection during a 30-year period.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 1963 and 1992, 360 patients (256 men and 104 women; mean +/- 1 SD age, 57 +/- 14 years) underwent surgery for aortic dissection: 174 patients had an acute type A (AcA), 46 an acute type B (AcB), 106 a chronic type A (ChA), and 34 a chronic type B (ChB) aortic dissection. The overall operative mortality rate was 24 +/- 8% (26 +/- 3% for AcA, 39 +/- 8% for AcB, 17 +/- 4% for ChA, and 15 +/- 6% for ChB, [+/- 70% confidence limit]). The operative mortality rates for patients with acute aortic dissection (AcA or AcB) were assessed for five time "windows": 1963 to 1972 (42 +/- 8%), 1973 to 1977 (37 +/- 8%), 1978 to 1982 (15 +/- 6%), 1983 to 1987 (27 +/- 6%), and 1988 to 1992 (26 +/- 6%). Logistic regression analysis suggested that the low operative mortality rate during the 1978-to-1982 interval occurred by chance. Multivariate analysis showed earlier operative year, hypertension, cardiac tamponade, renal dysfunction, and older age were independent determinants of operative death. Actuarial survival rates (including early deaths) after 5, 10, and 15 years for AcA patients were 55%, 37%, and 24%; for AcB, 48%, 29%, and 11%; for ChA, 65%, 45%, and 27%; and for ChB, 59%, 45%, and 27%. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age and previous operation were significant predictors for late death. Freedom from reoperation for all patients was 84%, 67%, and 57% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the operative mortality rate decreased over time for patients with aortic dissection, the risk for those with acute aortic dissection during the last 10 years (1983 to 1992) is probably more realistic than that observed in the preceding 5-year interval (1978 to 1982). The operative mortality rates for patients with chronic aortic dissection have remained relatively static. Earlier diagnosis of acute aortic dissection before development of cardiac tamponade and renal impairment is critical to improve the operative salvage rate. Long-term outcome still is not optimal, which emphasizes the need for better serial postoperative aortic imaging surveillance and medical follow-up and blood pressure control.

A 31p-magnetic resonance study of antegrade and retrograde cerebral perfusion during aortic arch surgery in pigs

To evaluate the effect of hypothermic circulatory arrest on brain metabolism, we used 31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy to monitor brain metabolites in pigs during 2 hours of ischemia and 1 hour of reperfusion. Twenty-eight pigs were divided into five groups. Anesthesia (n = 5) and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass groups (n = 5) served as controls. In the circulatory arrest (n = 6), antegrade perfusion (n = 6), and retrograde (n = 6) brain perfusion groups, the bypass flow rate was 60 to 100 ml.kg-1.min-1. In the antegrade group, the brain was perfused via the carotid arteries at a blood flow rate of 180 to 200 ml.min-1 during circulatory arrest at 15 degrees C. In the retrograde group, the brain was perfused through the superior vena cava at a flow rate of 300 to 500 ml.min-1 during circulatory arrest at 15 degrees C. The intracellular pH was 7.1 +/- 0.1 and 7.3 +/- 0.1 in the anesthesia and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass groups, respectively. In the circulatory arrest group, the intracellular pH decreased to 6.2 +/- 0.1 and did not recover to its initial value (7.0 +/- 0.1) during reperfusion (p < 0.05 compared with the value obtained from the control groups at the corresponding time). Inorganic phosphate did not return to its initial level during reperfusion. In three animals in this group, levels of high-energy phosphates, adenosine triphosphate and phosphocreatine, recovered partially but did not reach the levels observed before arrest. In the group receiving antegrade perfusion, cerebral metabolites and intracellular pH were unchanged throughout the protocol. During circulatory arrest in the retrograde perfusion group the intracellular pH decreased to 6.4 +/- 0.1 and recovered fully during reperfusion (7.1 +/- 0.1). High-energy phosphates also returned to their initial levels during reperfusion. These studies show that deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with antegrade brain perfusion provides the best brain protection of the options investigated.

Operation for type A aortic dissection: introduction of retrograde cerebral perfusion

Circulatory support during operation for type A aortic dissection is controversial among many medical centers. In the last 21 years, 100 patients with type A aortic dissection underwent 102 operations including 2 reoperations, and 29 patients showed Marfan's syndrome. During operation, no cerebral perfusion technique was used through February 1985 (period I), antegrade cerebral perfusion was applied since March 1985 (period II), and retrograde cerebral perfusion was introduced in November 1990 (period III). Surgical results were compared among these subgroups. Operative mortality was 12.1% in 33 chronic and 57.1% in 7 acute patients in period I, 11.1% in 27 chronic and 54.5% in 11 acute patients in period II, and 6.7% in 15 chronic and 0% in 9 acute patients in period III (period II versus III; p = 0.04). Retrograde cerebral perfusion decreased permanent brain complications. The 5-year actuarial survival was 59.7% in period I and 63.2% in period II (not significant), and the 3-year survival of period III was 91.7%. Actuarial survival of period III was significantly higher than those of periods I and II (p < 0.05). Surgical repair of aortic arch with cerebral perfusion techniques reduced the residual aneurysms. These results show that surgical results of type A aortic dissection in this series improved with the introduction of retrograde cerebral perfusion and extended surgical procedures.

Total arch graft replacement in patients with acute type A aortic dissection

Treatment of acute type A aortic dissection with emergency total aortic arch graft replacement remains controversial. Between December 1988 and July 1993, 30 patients with this fatal disease underwent graft replacement of both the ascending aorta and total aortic arch on an emergency basis. All operations were performed with the aid of extracorporeal circulation, blood cardioplegia, selective cerebral perfusion, and open distal anastomosis. The overall early mortality rate was 23.3% (7 patients), but that in patients with complications with shock and renal/mesenteric ischemia was 57% and 66.7%, respectively. On the other hand, the mortality rate in the 23 patients (77%) in whom neither of these two risk factors was present was low (8.7%). The overall 4-year survival rate was 66.5% +/- 8.7%, and that for patients without these two risk factors was 87.0% +/- 7.0%. The present data suggest that simultaneous total arch replacement may be justified in selected patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

Subtypes of acute aortic dissection

The technique of open distal anastomosis using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was used in 69 cases of acute type A aortic dissection. These cases were subcategorized by site of intimal tear, which was found in the ascending aorta in 41 patients (60%), in the arch in 22 patients (32%), and in the descending aorta in 5 patients (7%). Clinical characteristics and complications are described for these subtypes. Hospital mortality, which was 14.5% overall for acute type A dissections, was 14.6% for ascending tears, 18.2% for arch tears, and 0% for descending aortic tears. Six-year survival was 69% +/- 15% for ascending tears, 69% +/- 22% for arch tears, and 80% +/- 25% for descending tears (mean +/- SEM, p = NS). A classification system for aortic dissection is proposed, based on both site of origin and propagation.

Late reoperations in patients with aortic dissection

Aortic dissection is an evolving process that may require one or several reoperations after the initial emergency repair. From January 1977 to September 1993, 148 patients underwent emergency surgery for type A acute aortic dissection. The replacement of the ascending aorta was extended to include the transverse arch in 43 patients (29%). One hundred fifteen patients (78%) survived surgery. During the same period, 37 patients required reoperation once (28), twice (7), or three times (2), for a total of 48 reoperations. Twenty-one patients had undergone initial repair in our institution; 16 patients had been operated on elsewhere. Reoperation was indicated for: aortic valve disease (4); a new dissecting process (7); threatening aneurysmal evolution of a persisting dissection (34); or false aneurysm (3). The re-do procedure involved: the aortic root and/or ascending aorta in 12 cases (group I); the ascending aorta and the transverse arch in 6 cases (group II); the transverse arch alone in 8 cases (group III); the transverse arch and descending aorta, or the descending aorta alone in 11 cases (group IV); and the thoracoabdominal aorta in 11 cases (group V). Risk factors for reoperation were analyzed in the 115 survivors initially operated on at our institution. Seven of 20 Marfan patients (35%) versus 12 of 95 non-Marfan patients (12.6%) required reoperation (p < 0.02). None of the 31 patients surviving arch replacement at initial repair required a reoperation, versus 21 of 84 (25%) patients surviving replacement limited to the ascending aorta (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Tactics and techniques of aortic arch replacement

Operations on the nondissected and dissected aortic arch still pose challenges in terms of the need for and extent of aortic replacement. Our approaches to these lesions are described against the background of 204 operations (58 aneurysms, 54 chronic dissections, and 92 acute dissections), in terms of cerebral protection, procedural choices, and operative technique. Arch anastomoses sparing the supraaortic vessels had shorter periods of circulatory arrest (17.2 min) when compared to tubular arch replacement, with insertion of some or all of these vessels (33.7 min). Early death rates due to cerebral complications were lowest in acute dissections (3/14 fatalities, with two patients showing preoperative cerebral compromise). Based on our experience, we recommend doing subtotal or total arch replacement in aneurysms regardless of cause. Radical arch surgery should be avoided in acute dissections whenever feasible. Instead, the arch should be explored and a blood-tight distal anastomosis made, going beyond any entry tears encountered in that aortic portion.