Bicalutamide in the treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma: a phase II noncomparative multicenter trial evaluating safety, efficacy and long-term endocrine effects of monotherapy

Non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy compared with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists or surgical castration monotherapy for advanced prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Non-steroidal antiandrogens and castration are the main therapy options for advanced stages of prostate cancer. However, debate regarding the value of these treatment options continues.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy compared with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists or surgical castration monotherapy for treating advanced stages of prostate cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Prostatic Diseases and Urologic Cancers Group Specialized Register (PROSTATE), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science with Conference Proceedings, three trial registries and abstracts from three major conferences to 23 December 2013, together with reference lists, and contacted selected experts in the field and manufacturers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy with medical or surgical castration monotherapy for men in advanced stages of prostate cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One review author screened all titles and abstracts; only citations that were clearly irrelevant were excluded at this stage. Then, two review authors independently examined full-text reports, identified relevant studies, assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted the study authors to request additional information. We used Review Manager 5 for data synthesis and used the fixed-effect model for heterogeneity less than 50%; we used the random-effects model for substantial or considerable heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven studies involving 3060 randomly assigned participants were included in this review. The quality of evidence is hampered by risk of bias. Use of non-steroidal antiandrogens decreased overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 1.48, six studies, 2712 participants) and increased clinical progression (one year: risk ratio (RR) 1.25, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.45, five studies, 2067 participants; 70 weeks: RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.45, six studies, 2373 participants; two years: RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.25, three studies, 1336 participants), as well as treatment failure (one year: RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.38, four studies, 1539 participants; 70 weeks: RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.52, five studies, 1845 participants; two years: RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.24, two studies, 808 participants), compared with medical or surgical castration. The quality of evidence for overall survival, clinical progression and treatment failure was rated as moderate according to GRADE. Predefined subgroup analyses showed that use of non-steroidal antiandrogens, compared with castration, was less favourable for overall survival, clinical progression (at one year, 70 weeks, two years) and treatment failure (at one year, 70 weeks, two years) in men with metastatic disease. Use of non-steroidal antiandrogens also increased the risk for treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.94, eight studies, 1559 participants), including events such as breast pain (RR 22.97, 95% CI 14.79 to 35.67, eight studies, 2670 participants), gynaecomastia (RR 8.43, 95% CI 3.19 to 22.28, nine studies, 2774 participants) and asthenia (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.31, five studies, 2073 participants). The risk of other adverse events, such as hot flashes (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.27, nine studies, 2774 participants), haemorrhage (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.54, two studies, 546 participants), nocturia (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.69, one study, 480 participants), fatigue (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.88, one study, 51 participants), loss of sexual interest (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.83, one study, 51 participants) and urinary frequency (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.47, one study, 480 participants) was decreased when non-steroidal antiandrogens were used. The quality of evidence for breast pain, gynaecomastia and hot flashes was rated as moderate according to GRADE. The effects of non-steroidal antiandrogens on cancer-specific survival and biochemical progression remained unclear.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently available evidence suggests that use of non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy compared with medical or surgical castration monotherapy for advanced prostate cancer is less effective in terms of overall survival, clinical progression, treatment failure and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. Evidence quality was rated as moderate according to GRADE. Further research is likely to have an important impact on results for patients with advanced but non-metastatic prostate cancer treated with non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy. However, we believe that research is likely not necessary on non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy for men with metastatic prostate cancer. Only high-quality, randomised controlled trials with long-term follow-up should be conducted. If further research is planned to investigate biochemical progression, studies with standardised follow-up schedules using measurements of prostate-specific antigen based on current guidelines should be conducted.

Enzalutamide monotherapy in hormone-naive prostate cancer: primary analysis of an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

The androgen receptor inhibitor enzalutamide is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that has progressed on docetaxel. Our aim was to assess the activity and safety of enzalutamide monotherapy in men with hormone-naive prostate cancer.

METHODS

This trial is an ongoing open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, done across 12 European sites. Men aged over 18 years, with hormone-naive prostate cancer for whom hormone therapy was indicated, and who had non-castration levels of testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 2 ng/mL or greater at screening, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0, received oral enzalutamide 160 mg/day. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an 80% or greater decline in PSA at week 25. All analyses included all patients who had received at least one dose of the study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01302041.

FINDINGS

67 men were enrolled into the study. 62 patients (92.5%, 95% CI 86.2-98.8) had a decline in PSA of 80% or greater at week 25. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events up to week 25 were gynaecomastia (n=24), fatigue (n=23), nipple pain (n=13), and hot flush (n=12), all of which were of mild to moderate severity. Nine patients had a treatment-emergent adverse event of grade 3 or higher, most of which were reported in one patient each, except for pneumonia (grade 3, two patients) and hypertension (grade 3, four patients). Five patients reported serious adverse events, none of which were deemed to be treatment related.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest that enzalutamide monotherapy in men with hormone-naive prostate cancer of varying severity provides a level of disease suppression, and was generally well tolerated. These findings provide a rationale for further investigation of clinical response and outcomes with enzalutamide in non-castrate men with prostate cancer.

Intermittent tri-weekly docetaxel plus bicalutamide in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a single-arm prospective study using a historical control for comparison

Whether continuous docetaxel (DTX) chemotherapy offers an advantage over intermittent therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is unknown. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy, toxicity and quality of life (QoL) of intermittent tri-weekly DTX with bicalutamide in CRPC. Forty-two patients (group A) with CRPC were enrolled. The patients received intravenous DTX (75 mg m(-2)) once tri-weekly with oral bicalutamide (50 mg) once daily. Patients had a DTX holiday when the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level declined ≥50%. DTX was restarted in patients with a PSA increase ≥25%. Sixty patients (group B) who had matching characteristics and had continuously received DTX without bicalutamide for 10-12 cycles were also enrolled. There were no statistically significant differences in progression-free survival (8 months vs. 9 months, P=0.866) or overall survival (19 months vs. 21 months, P=0.753) between groups A and B; however, the proportions of patients in group A with all grades of neutropenia (33% vs. 58%, P=0.013) and nausea/vomiting (11% vs. 29%, P=0.024) were significantly less compared to group B. A significant improvement in the global health and fatigue scores was recorded for group A post-chemotherapy compared to pre-chemotherapy (P<0.05). The fatigue, nausea/vomiting and appetite loss scores in group B were increased post-chemotherapy compared to pre-chemotherapy (P<0.05). In conclusion, intermittent tri-weekly DTX plus bicalutamide is well tolerated and has the potential to achieve comparable disease control with an improvement in QoL for patients with CRPC.

The effect of baseline testosterone on the efficacy of degarelix and leuprolide: further insights from a 12-month, comparative, phase III study in prostate cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of baseline testosterone on testosterone control and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) suppression using data from a phase III trial (CS21) comparing degarelix and leuprolide in prostate cancer.

METHODS

In CS21, patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer (all stages) were randomized to degarelix 240 mg for 1 month followed by monthly maintenance doses of 80 or 160 mg, or leuprolide 7.5 mg/month. Patients receiving leuprolide could receive antiandrogens for flare protection. Treatment effects on testosterone and PSA reduction, testosterone surge, and microsurges were investigated in 3 baseline testosterone subgroups: <3.5, 3.5-5.0, and >5.0 ng/mL. Data are presented for the groups receiving degarelix 240/80 mg (the approved dose) and leuprolide 7.5 mg.

RESULTS

Higher baseline testosterone delayed castration with both treatments. However, castrate testosterone levels and PSA suppression occurred more rapidly with degarelix irrespective of baseline testosterone. With leuprolide, the magnitude of testosterone surge and microsurges increased with increasing baseline testosterone. There was no overall correlation between baseline testosterone and initial PSA decrease in either treatment group, although PSA suppression tended to be slowest with leuprolide and fastest with degarelix in the high baseline testosterone subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Patients with high baseline testosterone may have greater risk of tumor stimulation (clinical flare) and mini-flares during gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist treatment and so the need for flare protection with antiandrogens in these patients is obvious, especially in metastatic disease. Although higher baseline testosterone delays castration, castrate testosterone and PSA suppression occur more rapidly with degarelix, irrespective of baseline testosterone, without the need for flare protection.

In young men, a moderate inhibition of testosterone synthesis capacity is only partly compensated by increased activity of the pituitary and the hypothalamus

CONTEXT

The classical interpretation of the feedback regulation of the male hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis predicts that a partial inhibition of testosterone (T) synthesis will result in a compensatory rise in LH secretion. The question arises as to whether such a compensation is complete or that decreased T synthesis may result in a lower plasma T concentration.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a moderate inhibition of T synthesis capacity will be fully compensated by increased LH secretion. DESIGN, SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS: In nine young healthy men, we partially inhibited T synthesis capacity using ketoconazole (KTZ) 100 mg four times daily. On day -6 (1 week prior to KTZ intake), days 1 and 8 of KTZ administration blood was drawn [07:00 h (t(1)), 10:00 h (t(2)), 13:00 h (t(3))] for evaluation of T, LH, oestradiol (E2), 17-OH-progesterone (17OHP), progesterone (PR) and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG). On day 8, 5000 IU of hCG were administered to evaluate the maximal T secretion under KTZ.

RESULTS

Administration of KTZ resulted in an acute, moderate but significant decrease of plasma T concentration. On day 8, plasma LH, 17OHP and PR were elevated relative to day -6 and day 1, but mean T was still lower compared to day -6. Mean E2 and SHBG were only slightly affected by KTZ. After stimulation by hCG, plasma T was restored to its baseline level.

CONCLUSION

These results argue against the assumption that a moderate decline in T synthesis capacity will be compensated completely by increased LH secretion.

Effects of oestradiol on gonadotrophin levels in normal and castrated men

CONTEXT

Testosterone inhibits gonadotrophin release in men either directly or after aromatization to oestradiol. We hypothesized that in males the androgen receptor-mediated effect of testosterone on LH release is negligible relative to that of oestradiol.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of experimentally induced variations of plasma oestradiol levels on LH levels in normal (physiological testosterone levels) and castrated men (very low testosterone levels).

DESIGN

Prospective, open label, intervention.

SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS

We suppressed endogenous oestradiol in 10 young men with letrozole 2.5 mg once daily. In these men and in 10 young healthy castrated men, we restored plasma oestradiol levels with oestradiol patches (first week 100 mug/day, second week 50 mug/day, third week 25 mug/day and fourth week no oestradiol patch).

MEASUREMENTS

The effect of the intervention on plasma levels of LH were monitored and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

With the intervention, the mean plasma oestradiol level in the two groups varied from supraphysiological to below the lower reference range. Levels of LH mirrored plasma oestradiol levels in both the groups, as did testosterone in the intact group. Despite similar oestradiol levels, mean levels of LH were significantly higher in the castrated group compared to the intact group for all doses of oestradiol, and supraphysiological levels of oestradiol were unable to suppress LH into the physiological range in the castrated group.

CONCLUSIONS

Physiological plasma oestradiol levels have a substantial suppressive effect on LH in men. However, low-normal testosterone levels are a prerequisite for suppression of LH into the normal range.

Choices for Surgery

Surgical treatment of prostate cancer has seen many improvements in the past two decades, including laparoscopy, robotic surgery, and better assessment of quality of life and functional results. The limits of surgery for locally advanced disease and after failure of radiotherapy have been better defined, together with the roles of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment. Patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer, reasonable life expectancy, and little or no co-morbidity are the best candidates for radical prostatectomy. This chapter reviews the different technical options for the treatment of prostate cancer, with their respective indications and functional and oncological results.

Prevention and management of bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia and breast pain: randomized endocrinologic and clinical studies with tamoxifen and anastrozole

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial involving 107 men receiving bicalutamide ('Casodex') 150 mg/day therapy following radical therapy for prostate cancer assessed tamoxifen ('Nolvadex') 20 mg/day and anastrozole ('Arimidex') 1 mg/day for the prophylaxis and treatment of gynecomastia/breast pain. Tamoxifen, but not anastrozole, significantly reduced the incidence of gynecomastia/breast pain when used prophylactically and therapeutically. Serum testosterone levels increased with tamoxifen relative to placebo but prostate-specific antigen levels declined in all treatment groups. Further studies are needed to define the optimum tamoxifen dose and to assess any impact on cancer control. The use of tamoxifen in this setting remains to be investigated.

Bicalutamide

Bicalutamide is a nonsteroidal pure antiandrogen given at a dosage of 150 mg once daily as monotherapy for the treatment of early (localised or locally advanced) nonmetastatic prostate cancer. It is used at a dosage of 50 mg once daily in combination with a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone analogue or surgical castration for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Bicalutamide is a racemate and its antiandrogenic activity resides almost exclusively in the (R)-enantiomer, with little, if any, activity in the (S)-enantiomer. (R)-Bicalutamide is slowly and saturably absorbed, but absorption is unaffected by food. It has a long plasma elimination half-life (1 week) and accumulates about 10-fold in plasma during daily administration. (S)-Bicalutamide is much more rapidly absorbed and cleared from plasma; steady-state concentrations (Css) of (R)-bicalutamide are 100-fold higher than those of (S)-bicalutamide. Css increases linearly with doses up to 50 mg, but nonlinearly at higher doses, reaching a plateau above 300 mg. Css is higher in Japanese than in Caucasians, but no relationship with degree of renal impairment, bodyweight or age exists. Although mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment does not affect pharmacokinetics, there is evidence for slower elimination of (R)-bicalutamide in subjects with severe hepatic impairment. Bicalutamide metabolites are excreted almost equally in urine and faeces with little or no unchanged drug excreted in urine; conversely, unchanged drug predominates in plasma. Bicalutamide in faeces is thought to arise from hydrolysis of bicalutamide glucuronide and from unabsorbed drug. Bicalutamide appears to be cleared almost exclusively by metabolism; this is largely mediated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) for (R)-bicalutamide, but glucuronidation is the predominant metabolic route for (S)-bicalutamide. (S)-Bicalutamide is metabolised in vitro by CYP3A4, and it is probable that this isoenzyme is also responsible for the metabolism of (R)-bicalutamide. In vitro data suggest that (R)-bicalutamide has the potential to inhibit CYP3A4 and, to a lesser extent, CYP2C9, 2C19 and 2D6. However, using midazolam as a specific CYP3A4 marker, no clinically relevant inhibition is observed in vivo with bicalutamide 150mg. Although bicalutamide is a CYP inducer in laboratory animals, dosages < or = 150 mg/day have shown no evidence of enzyme induction in humans. Daily administration of bicalutamide increases circulating levels of gonadotrophins and sex hormones; although testosterone increases by up to 80%, concentrations in most patients remain within the normal range. Bicalutamide produces a dose-related decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at dosages < or = 150 mg/day. However, little relationship is observed between median PSA reduction and (R)-bicalutamide Css.

The use of flutamide as a single antiandrogen treatment for hormone-refractory prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of low-dose flutamide (125 mg twice daily) in the treatment of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after definitive treatment with radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), external-beam radiation therapy (RT), or cryotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this phase II prospective trial, patients who had a PSA recurrence after definitive treatment for prostate cancer were treated with flutamide. Endpoints for assessing treatment efficacy were PSA progression, treatment toxicity and clinical symptoms. Results were stratified into complete response (PSA < 0.2 ng/mL on two consecutive assessments), partial response (PSA decrease of half that at baseline on two consecutive assessments) and progressive disease. Seventeen patients were enrolled in who definitive treatment for primary prostate cancer had failed.

RESULTS

Low-dose flutamide was clinically effective (i.e. complete or partial response) in 13 patients. Four had a complete response (mean duration 28 months), nine a partial response (mean duration 19 months), and two progressive disease, but were in the study for a mean of 1 year before progression. Two patients discontinued the study at 3 months, secondary to drug-related toxicity; one had grade 3 toxicity and five grade 1 toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of low-dose flutamide (125 mg) was clinically effective in treating PSA recurrence after definitive treatments for prostate cancer, and was well tolerated. Further investigation in a phase III trial is warranted.

Will the experience with tamoxifen in breast cancer help define the role of antiandrogens in prostate cancer?

Breast and prostate cancers are the two predominant hormone-responsive tumours. The use of the antioestrogen tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer has evolved over the past 30 y from treatment for advanced breast cancer to prevention. Tamoxifen is currently the endocrine treatment of choice for advanced breast cancer and for adjuvant therapy in a broad spectrum of women whose primary tumours have functional oestrogen receptors. It has also been shown to reduce the incidence of breast cancer in high-risk women. Non-steroidal antiandrogen therapy is used in the treatment of prostate cancer, but its role is still being defined. The clinical development of tamoxifen and that of the antiandrogens are reviewed and parallels are uncovered which provide insight into contemporary and future management of hormone-responsive prostate cancer.Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2001) 4, 72-80

Trends in hormonal management of prostate cancer: a population-based study in Ontario

OBJECTIVE

To provide a population-based description of current practice in the use of hormonal management of prostate cancer. DESIGN,SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: All men in Ontario, Canada, age 65 and older, with confirmed prostate cancer starting maintained hormonal therapy, from July 1992 through December 1998 (11,435 patients). Data sources included the provincial drug benefit plan, hospital services data, and Ontario Cancer Registry.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Rates and trends in the use of: surgical or medical castration; total androgen blockade (TAB); and monotherapies based on steroidal or nonsteroidal antiandrogens.

RESULTS

In 5.5 years, use of 'standard' therapy based on surgical or medical castration alone dropped from 36% to 26% of patients, while the use of TAB doubled from 22% to 41%. Approximately 15% of patients received nonsteroidal antiandrogens without evidence of therapy aimed at central androgen blockade. Marked regional differences were observed and not explained by patient age or practitioner specialty.

CONCLUSIONS

New hormonal therapies for prostate cancer have implications in terms of disease control, patient survival, side effects, and costs. Rapid growth in prescribing of antiandrogens may represent an unnecessary expense for public or private payers, and observed regional differences likely reflect lack of consensus on the relative merit of TAB. Patients and practitioners must have current information on the advantages and disadvantages of different therapeutic options, and quality-of life, particularly with respect to emerging drug therapies.

Effects of long-term treatment with the anti-androgen bicalutamide on human testis: an ultrastructural and morphometric study

AIMS

To assess the effects of more than 4 years' treatment with the anti-androgen bicalutamide on human testis by clinical, ultrastructural and morphometric analysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two patients (aged 74 and 69 years) with prostate cancer were treated for more than 4 years with bicalutamide 50 mg daily. Clinical characterization and follow-up included luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements and clinical response of the tumours. Due to progression of the disease, patients underwent surgical orchidectomy as a further androgen withdrawal therapy. Testis biopsies were studied by light and electron microscopy and analysed by morphometry. Control samples were obtained from the normal testis of two patients with testicular cancer who underwent orchidectomy. Clinical follow-up showed a good response in the control of tumour growth and serum PSA decreased to < 4 ng/mL; concentrations of serum LH, FSH and testosterone were within the normal range. Testicular morphology of treated patients was unexpectedly well preserved; the organization of seminiferous tubules was normal with all the germ line elements and mature spermatozoa present. In some areas, a net increase of peritubular connective tissue was evident which may be a consequence of the age of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term bicalutamide (50 mg) treatment appears to have very little impact on testis ultrastructure and sperm maturation, while it is effective in the control of androgen-dependent prostatic tumours.

Hormonal treatment for prostate cancer

For nearly six decades the preferred primary treatment for advanced prostate cancer has been continuous suppression of testicular androgen production by medical or surgical castration. While androgen deprivation is effective in inducing tumour regression in the large majority of cases, essentially all patients will develop progressive disease. In addition androgen deprivation may be associated with a variety of side effects. Thus, strategies that minimise the use of these agents could potentially lower the morbidity and cost associated with the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. In the era of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, hormonal therapy is being used earlier in the course of the disease when the only evidence of recurrent disease is an elevated PSA. These men may survive for many years and thus have the potential for long periods of exposure to hormonal therapy and its side effects. It has been hoped that the development of alternative hormonal interventions might lead to both enhanced antitumour efficacy as well as improvements in side effect profile.

Survival of patients who had salvage castration after failure on bicalutamide monotherapy for stage (D2) prostate cancer

Patients with hormone-naive stage D2 prostate cancer often benefit from castration. This treatment, however, frequently produces many unacceptable physical and psychological side effects, especially in younger and sexually active patients. Bicalutamide is an oral antiandrogen with excellent tolerance and preservation of sexual function. Three institutions participated in phase II and III trials of bicalutamide monotherapy (50 mg daily) as primary therapy in hormone-naive patients with stage D2 prostate cancer. Upon bicalutamide failure, all patients underwent castration and were followed until death. Fifty-four patients received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once a day. One patient (2%) had complete response, 9 patients (17%) had partial response, and 27 patients (50%) had stable disease. Seventeen patients (31%) had progressive disease. The median time to bicalutamide failure was 47.4 weeks, 70.5 weeks for the responders vs. 25.4 weeks for the nonresponders (p < 0.001). The median survival time after the sequential use of bicalutamide and castration was 119.2 weeks for all 54 patients, 162.0 weeks for the responders, and 73.5 weeks for nonresponders (p < 0.0001). The median survival time after initiation of castration was 71.1 weeks for all 54 patients, 91.4 weeks for bicalutamide responders, and 42.1 weeks for nonresponders (p < 0.01). In hormone-naive patients with stage D2 prostate cancer, sequential treatment with bicalutamide monotherapy followed by castration upon failure may produce survival time within the range reported for initial treatment with castration. Thus, considering the favorable quality of life profile of bicalutamide, further studies are needed to define the role of sequential hormonal therapy in younger sexually active patients.

Effects of finasteride and bicalutamide on prostatic blood flow in the rat

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether finasteride and bicalutamide, both currently used in the clinical management of patients with prostate diseases because they have anti-androgenic properties, have any effects on prostatic blood flow in a rat prostate model, as androgens are known to be involved in the regulation of prostatic blood flow and angiogenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Both finasteride and bicalutamide were supplied as oral suspensions in water and given daily to rats for 7 days by tube feeding. Blood flows to the ventral and dorsal prostates, and to the kidneys, were measured using the radioactive microsphere technique. In the bicalutamide experiments, some rats were treated with the Leydig cell toxin ethane dimethane sulphonate (EDS), to obtain a castration-like effect, and one group of these rats received testosterone.

RESULTS

Finasteride induced a clear decrease in blood flow to the ventral and dorsal prostates after 7 days of treatment, with no significant changes in blood pressure or kidney blood flow. Bicalutamide inhibited the testosterone-induced increment of prostatic blood flow observed in EDS-treated animals.

CONCLUSIONS

Finasteride, a blocker of 5alpha-reductase, decreases prostate blood flow after 7 days of administration. The response was slower than that after castration, but was of similar magnitude. Blood flow was also decreased after treatment with the androgen-receptor inhibitor bicalutamide. These observations suggest that prostatic blood flow is increased by dihydrotestosterone, and that the androgen receptor is responsible for mediating this effect.

Goserelin acetate with or without antiandrogen or estrogen in the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in Japan. Zoladex Study Group

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this randomized, controlled study were to investigate the efficacy and safety of long-term monotherapy with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist goserelin acetate compared with both short- and long-term combined androgen blockade.

METHODS

Patients with advanced prostate cancer (n = 371) were randomized to treatment with goserelin acetate alone or a combination of goserelin acetate plus either long-term or short-term antiandrogen (chlormadinone acetate) or short-term estrogen (diethylstilbestrol diphosphate).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the treatment groups with respect to objective progression, overall survival or disease-specific survival. Nevertheless, subgroup analysis suggested that patients with minimal disease or a good prognosis might benefit more from combined androgen blockade than other patients. Combined androgen blockade significantly reduced the incidence of disease flare compared with goserelin acetate treatment alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither short- nor long-term combined androgen blockade had a survival advantage over goserelin acetate alone.

Endocrine therapy of prostate cancer

Endocrine therapy is effective treatment for patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Most patients will benefit from androgen withdrawal in terms of symptomatic relief and delay in progression of diseases. It does not, however, cure patients with metastatic prostate cancer. This finding emphasizes the need for the development of effective nonendocrine therapies.

Bicalutamide (Casodex) in the treatment of prostate cancer: history of clinical development

BACKGROUND

Bicalutamide (Casodex) is a new nonsteroidal antiandrogen developed for use in patients with prostate cancer. The efficacy and tolerability of bicalutamide as monotherapy and as combination therapy for patients with advanced prostate cancer have been evaluated in randomized clinical trials. Clinical trials are currently in progress to further evaluate bicalutamide as monotherapy in patients with advanced stages of disease and as adjuvant or first-line therapy in patients with early-stage disease.

METHODS

A review of published trials of bicalutamide focusing on dose-ranging investigations, phase II and phase III monotherapy trials, a phase III trial of combined androgen blockade, and a safety overview.

RESULTS

In dose-ranging trials, bicalutamide doses of 10-200 elicited biochemical, objective, and subjective responses; higher bicalutamide doses (up to 600 mg) have also been evaluated. A 50-mg daily dose of bicalutamide was initially evaluated as monotherapy in phase II and phase III trials; in subsequent trials, a 150-mg daily dose was investigated. A 150-mg daily dose is considered to provide equivalent survival outcome compared with castration in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer, whereas the benefits of a better quality of life and better palliation with the 150-mg daily bicalutamide dose relative to castration in patients with metastatic disease needs to be balanced against the small shortfall (median difference, 42 days) in survival. In combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist analogue (LHRH-A), a 50-mg daily dose of bicalutamide has equivalent efficacy to a corresponding flutamide (250 mg three times daily) combination regimen. Treatment with the bicalutamide combination regimen resulted in a longer median survival than with the flutamide combination regimen. Bicalutamide is well tolerated when used as monotherapy or in combination with a LHRH-A. The benefits of bicalutamide as monotherapy include retention of libido and sexual potency and as combination therapy a lower incidence of diarrhea relative to flutamide.

CONCLUSIONS

A 50-mg daily dose of bicalutamide is sufficient when given in combination with an agent, such as a LHRH-A, that lowers serum testosterone, but higher doses of bicalutamide may be needed when the drug is given as monotherapy. Bicalutamide, 50-mg daily, is a logical first choice for antiandrogen therapy when used in combination with an LHRH-A for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Bicalutamide 150-mg daily is considered an effective monotherapy for use in patients with locally advanced disease. Additional clinical trials are currently in progress to further evaluate bicalutamide as a monotherapy for advanced prostate cancer and to assess its value as adjuvant or first-line therapy for early-stage prostate cancer.