Combination cisplatin and dichloromethotrexate in patients with advanced bladder cancer. Phase 2. A Southwest Oncology Group study

Docetaxel and ifosfamide as second line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer after failure of platinum chemotherapy: a phase 2 study

PURPOSE

This phase 2 trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy with docetaxel and ifosfamide in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Enrolled in our study were 22 patients with advanced urothelial cancer who failed to respond or had relapse after previous platinum based chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of 60 mg./m.2 docetaxel given during 1 hour and 2.5 gm./m.2 ifosfamide given for 24 hours every 3 weeks with 500 mg. mesna administered intravenously at the start of the ifosfamide infusion, and 4 and 8 hours later. Patients also received premedication with oral dexamethasone.

RESULTS

The objective response rate in 20 evaluable patients was 25%, including 4 complete responses (20%) associated with lymph node only recurrence. Disease was stable in 5 cases. At followup 16 patients had died 1 to 11 months (median 4) after the initiation of treatment, while 6 remained alive at 4 to 14 months, including 3 who were continuously disease-free. Treatment was well tolerated. Grades 3 and 4 leukopenia developed in 17% and 4% of the cycles, respectively. Neutropenic sepsis and grade 4 thrombocytopenia developed in 1 case each. Nausea and vomiting were mild to moderate. Other nonhematological toxicities included a hypersensitivity reaction in 1 patient and paresthesias in 2.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of docetaxel and ifosfamide is active in previously treated patients with urothelial cancer, although it appears to be a reasonable treatment option only in those with lymph node dominant recurrence. The mild toxicity underlines the usefulness of the regimen in this setting. Further investigation of the combination in previously untreated patients seems warranted.

New approaches to treatment of metastatic bladder cancer

The combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, Adriamycin, and cisplatin (MVAC) has been the standard therapy for transitional cell carcinoma for over a decade. Despite evidence that MVAC can improve outcome in comparison with single drugs or other combinations in this disease, only a small fraction of patients (less than 4%) become long-term survivors, and the regimen is quite toxic. Attempts to improve upon the MVAC regimen have partially ameliorated its toxicity, but they have not clearly improved outcome. Recently, a number of new chemotherapeutic agents have become available. This report summarizes the current experience with these agents and combinations.

New approaches in the treatment of metastatic transitional-cell cancer of the bladder

In recent years, chemotherapy of metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder has advanced from the use of individual therapeutic agents, which has effected only rare responses, to the development of multi-agent regimens, which have greatly improved both partial and complete response rates, resulting in improved local care, palliation, and; perhaps, survival. However, because of the limited duration of response, frequent recurrences, and the significant proportion of patients with refractory disease, there have been only modest overall gains in long-term disease-free survival. These shortcomings have prompted investigation of alternative approaches to current combination chemotherapy regimens, including the use of hematopoietic growth factors and novel single-agent, multi-agent, and gene therapy protocols.