Percutaneous interventions in the biliary tree

Risk Factors for Complications Requiring Interventional Radiological Treatment After Hepatectomy

PURPOSE

To identify perioperative factors that are significantly associated with complications requiring interventional radiology (IR) treatment after hepatectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from 11,243 patients in the USA who underwent hepatectomy from 2014 to 2016 using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Data on the following IR procedures were extracted: abscess drain placement, endovascular treatment for bleeding, and postoperative percutaneous biliary drain (PBD) placement up to 30 days postoperatively. Patients' clinical and intraoperative factors were examined. Population, univariate, and multivariable analyses were performed. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 704 patients (6%) required IR treatment postoperatively, and 10,539 patients (94%) did not. On multivariable analysis, biliary reconstruction was a significant predictor of postoperative abscess drain placement (hazard ratio (HR), 3.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8, 6.5; P < .001), endovascular treatment for bleeding (HR, 3.3; 95% CI 1.4, 7.8 P = .006), and postoperative PBD placement (HR, 2.9; 95% CI 1.9, 4.2; P < .001). Compared with hepatectomy without biliary reconstruction, hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction was associated with significantly higher rates of complications treated with IR procedures (26% vs. 4.9%) and death within 30 days (6.0% vs. 1.2%) (both, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Biliary reconstruction is a strong predictor of the need for postoperative IR treatment after hepatectomy. One in four patients who underwent biliary reconstruction required IR treatment of a complication during the first 30 days after hepatectomy.

Abdominal pain in special populations

Evaluation and management of acute abdominal pain in special populations can be challenging for the emergency physician. This article focuses on two specific populations: patients with altered immunologic function and postprocedural patients. Recognition of life-threatening abdominal diseases may be delayed in immunosuppressed patients because of the atypical presentations of these conditions. In postprocedural patients, evaluation of acute abdominal symptoms requires an understanding of the complications of procedures often performed by others. The unique characteristics of abdominal pain in these two populations and, more specifically, which diseases to consider and how to use appropriate testing to detect life-threatening conditions, are discussed.

Complications of percutaneous procedures

Minimally invasive percutaneous procedures are increasingly being performed by both interventional radiologists and noninterventionalists. Patients with postprocedural issues will likely present to the emergency department for evaluation and treatment. This review focuses on the evaluation and management of the complications of common percutaneous procedures.