Rapamycin in combination with cyclosporine or tacrolimus in liver, pancreas, and kidney transplantation

mTOR Inhibition by Everolimus Does Not Impair Closure of Punch Biopsy Wounds in Renal Transplant Patients

Background

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are approved to prevent allograft rejection and control malignancy. Unfortunately, they are associated with adverse effects, such as wound healing complications that detract from more extensive use. There is a lack of prospective wound healing studies to monitor patients treated with mTOR inhibitors, such as everolimus or sirolimus, especially in nondiabetics.

Methods

Patients receiving everolimus with standard immunosuppressant therapy or standard immunosuppressant therapy without everolimus were administered 3-mm skin biopsy punch wounds in the left scapular region. Homeostatic gene expression was examined in the skin obtained from the biopsy and wound surface area was examined on day 7. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were examined for cytokine production.

Results

There are no significant changes in autophagy related 13, epidermal growth factor, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3, IL-2, kruppel-like factor 4, and TGFB1 gene expression in the skin suggesting that there is little impact of everolimus on these genes within nonwounded skin. Peripheral blood T cells are more sensitive to cell death in everolimus-treated patients, but they retain the ability to produce proinflammatory cytokines required for efficient wound repair. Importantly, there is no delay in the closure of biopsy wounds in patients receiving everolimus as compared to those not receiving mTOR inhibition.

Conclusions

Everolimus treatment is not associated with impaired closure of skin biopsy wounds in kidney transplant recipients. These data highlight the importance of exploring whether larger surgical wounds would show a similar result and how other factors, such as diabetes, impact wound healing complications associated with mTOR suppression.

Sirolimus and tacrolimus coefficient of variation is associated with rejection, donor-specific antibodies, and nonadherence

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppression medication nonadherence has been associated with donor-specific antibodies and treatment-refractory rejection. Drug-level monitoring is a practical direct marker for nonadherence, as variations indicate erratic ingestion of medication. We previously reported that high variability in tacrolimus trough levels determined by the percent coefficient of variation (CV %) and standard deviation (SD) were associated with biopsy-proven rejection. We hypothesized that the CV % and SD in patients on a sirolimus/low-dose tacrolimus regimen may associate with self-reported medication nonadherence, rejection and donor-specific antibodies.

METHODS

In this pilot feasibility study, we studied 37 biopsies in 23 pediatric renal transplant patients on both sirolimus and tacrolimus immunosuppression; CV %, SD, de novo donor-specific antibodies, rejection, and self-reported adherence were examined.

RESULTS

A cut-off sirolimus CV % of 25 maximized the percentage of biopsies correctly classified as rejection (32 of 37, or 86 %, p = 0.001). A cut-off tacrolimus CV % of 31 maximized the percentage of correctly classified biopsies (25 of 37, or 68 %, p = 0.09). Among patients with both high sirolimus and tacrolimus CV %, 67 % developed de novo donor-specific antibodies (p = 0.002) with a DQ predominance and 71 % reported nonadherence (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric renal transplantation, sirolimus and tacrolimus CV % is a potential tool for monitoring patients at risk for allograft rejection and donor-specific antibodies secondary to medication nonadherence.

mTOR inhibitors in pediatric kidney transplantation

The mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors sirolimus and everolimus are increasingly being used in pediatric kidney transplantation in different combinations and doses. Several studies have shown beneficial effects of using mTOR inhibitors in children after pediatric renal transplantation. A switch to a low-dose calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and mTOR inhibitor has been proven to stabilize the glomerular filtration rate. Additionally, de novo studies using a low-dose CNI and an mTOR inhibitor have shown good graft survival and a low number of rejections. Side effects of mTOR inhibitors, such as hyperlipidemia, wound healing problems, and proteinuria, mainly occur if high doses are given and if treatment is not combined with a CNI. Lower doses of mTOR inhibitors do not result in growth impairment or reduced testosterone levels. Treatment with mTOR inhibitors is also associated with a lower number of viral infections, especially cytomegalovirus. Due to their antiproliferative effect, mTOR inhibitors could theoretically reduce the risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. mTOR inhibitors, especially in combination with low-dose CNIs, can safely be used in children after kidney transplantation as de novo therapy or for conversion from CNI- and mycophenolate mofetil-based regimens.

Incidence and risk of treatment-related mortality with mTOR inhibitors everolimus and temsirolimus in cancer patients: a meta-analysis

Background

Two novel mammalian targets of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors everolimus and temsirolimus are now approved by regulatory agencies and have been widely investigated among various types of solid tumors, but the risk of fatal adverse events (FAEs) with these drugs is not well defined.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases for relevant trials. Eligible studies included prospective phase II and III trials evaluating everolimus and temsirolimus in patients with all malignancies and data on FAEs were available. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the summary incidence, RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by using either random effects or fixed effect models according to the heterogeneity of the included studies.

Results

A total of 3322 patients with various advanced solid tumors from 12 trials were included. The overall incidence of mTOR inhibitors associated FAEs was 1.8% (95%CI: 1.3–2.5%), and the incidences of everolimus related FAEs were comparable to that of temsirolimus (1.7% versus 1.8%). Compared with the controls, the use of mTOR inhibitors was associated with an increased risk of FAEs, with a RR of 3.24 (95%CI: 1.21–8.67, p = 0.019). On subgroup analysis, a non-statistically significant increase in the risk of FAEs was found according to different mTOR inhibitors, tumor types or controlled therapy. No evidence of publication bias was observed.

Conclusion

With the present evidence, the use of mTOR inhibitors seems to increase the risk of FAEs in patients with advanced solid tumors. More high quality trials are still needed to investigate this association.

Calcineurin inhibitor minimization using sirolimus leads to improved renal function in pediatric heart transplant recipients

The introduction of cyclosporine revolutionized the practice of immunosuppression for solid organ transplant recipients, and has resulted in a significant increase in survival. While CNI use has been the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy in pediatric heart transplantation, CNIs have been associated with an increased risk of nephropathy leading to significant morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the effect on renal function of a CNI minimization protocol using SRL in pediatric heart transplant patients with CNI induced renal insufficiency. An IRB approved retrospective chart review and case control study was performed. There were 20 patients identified with renal insufficiency who had been converted to SRL (target 5-8 ng/mL) and cyclosporine (target 50-75 vs. 125-150 ng/mL). Renal insufficiency was defined as isotopic (Indium 111 DTPA) GFR <60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) or sCr >1 mg/dL. Outcome variables evaluated were GFR and sCr at time of conversion and at two yr post conversion. Comparison was made with case control subjects matched for age at Tx, time from Tx to conversion, and initial GFR. The median age at Tx = 81 days (S.D. ±26), median time of conversion after Tx = 10 yrs (s.d. ±0.65). Self-limited/treatable side effects included hypercholesterolemia (10), neutropenia (6), aphthous ulcer (3), edema (2), anemia (2), and tremor (1). One patient rejected in the two yr prior to conversion, and one patient had two rejection episodes following conversion. GFR at conversion for study group was 51 ± 14 vs. 60 ± 2 at two yr, p = 0.018. GFR at inclusion for control group was 56 ± 20 vs. 53 ± 21, p = 0.253. This report demonstrates that minimizing CNI exposure by addition of SRL to the immunosuppressant regimen in pediatric heart transplant recipients result in improved renal function in comparison to historically managed patients. Furthermore, immunotherapy with SRL and lower-dose CNI can effectively prevent rejection with an acceptable side-effect profile.

Sirolimus in pediatric renal transplantation

SRL, an mTOR inhibitor that inhibits cell cycle progression, represents an important alternative to CNIs, which are still the cornerstones of pediatric solid organ tx. Because there are still limited data on SRL use among pediatric solid organ recipients, further studies are needed to verify the efficacy and safety of SRL. It has unique pharmacokinetic characteristics concerning dosing intervals and reduction of the dose in combination with other immunosuppressants. SRL also has antineoplastic, antiviral, and antiatherogenic advantages over other immunosuppressive agents. The adverse effects of SRL including thrombocytopenia, hyperlipidemia, proteinuria, impaired wound healing, mouth ulcers, edema, male hypogonadism, TMA, and interstitial pneumonitis must be considered carefully in pediatric population. This article reviews the most recent data on SRL application in the field of pediatric renal tx.

Evolving concepts in the selection of immunosuppression regimen for liver transplant recipients

The introduction of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) based immunosuppression has revolutionized the field of liver transplantation by dramatically reducing the incidence of acute cellular rejection and prolonging patient and allograft survival. However, the introduction of CNIs has also come at the price of increased patient morbidity, particularly with regard to the well-known nephrotoxic effects of the medications. In an effort to minimize the adverse effects, immunosuppression regimen have evolved to include the use of various induction agents and purine synthesis inhibitors to limit the dose of CNI necessary to achieve low acute cellular rejection rates. Careful assessments of risks and benefits are needed as these newer agents have their own side effect profiles. In addition, the impact of newer immunosuppression regimen on hepatitis C (HCV) recurrence has not been completely elucidated. This review will provide an overview of the most common immunosuppression regimen used in liver transplantation and discuss their impact on acute cellular rejection, patient and allograft survival, and HCV recurrence.

A comprehensive review of immunosuppression used for liver transplantation

Since liver transplantation was approved for the treatment of end stage liver disease, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI's) have played a critical role in the preservation of allograft function. Unfortunately, these medications cause a variety of Side effects such as diabetes, hypertension and nephrotoxicity which in turn result in significant morbidity and reduced quality of life. A variety of newer immunosuppressants have been evaluated over the last decade in an attempt to either substitute for CNI's or use with reduced dose CNI's while still preserving allograft function However, current data does not recommend complete cessation of CNI's due to unacceptably high rates of allograft rejection. As these medications have their own unique adverse effects, a careful assessment on their risks and benefits is essential, particularly when additive or synergistic effects with CNI's may occur. Furthermore, the impact of these newer medications on the risk of hepatitis C recurrence and progression remains to be elucidated. Controlled trials are urgently required to assist transplant physicians with choosing the optimum immunosuppressive regimen for their patients. This review will discuss commonly used immunosuppressants prescribed in liver transplantation, emerging therapties and where appropriate, the impact of these medications on the recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation.

Sirolimus is associated with veno-occlusive disease of the liver after myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Sirolimus is an effective agent used in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after allogeneic transplantation. It also has antiproliferative effects on vascular endothelium when used to coat coronary artery stents. We noted an excess of veno-occlusive disease (VOD) in a clinical trial, and retrospectively reviewed the records of 488 patients to determine the association between sirolimus and VOD. When used with cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation (Cy/TBI) conditioning, sirolimus is associated with an increased incidence of VOD (OR 2.35, P = .005). The concomitant use of methotrexate further increased this rate (OR 3.23, P < .001), while sirolimus without methotrexate was not associated with an increased risk of VOD (OR 1.55, P = .33). Mortality after VOD diagnosis was unaffected, and overall treatment-related mortality was lowest when sirolimus was used without methotrexate. Similar findings were noted in matched, related, and unrelated as well as mismatched donor subgroups. When used with busulfan-based conditioning, sirolimus use was associated with an even higher rate of VOD (OR 8.8, P = .008). Our findings suggest that sirolimus use is associated with VOD after TBI-based transplantation when used with methotrexate after transplantation. Sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis without methotrexate is associated with the greatest overall survival. Myeloablative doses of busulfan should not be used with sirolimus-based immunosuppression.

Defects in skin gamma delta T cell function contribute to delayed wound repair in rapamycin-treated mice

Disruptions in the normal program of tissue repair can result in poor wound healing, which perturbs the integrity of barrier tissues such as the skin. Such defects in wound repair occur in transplant recipients treated with the immunosuppressant drug rapamycin (sirolimus). Intraepithelial lymphocytes, such as gammadelta T cells in the skin, mediate tissue repair through the production of cytokines and growth factors. The capacity of skin-resident T cells to function during rapamycin treatment was analyzed in a mouse model of wound repair. Rapamycin treatment renders skin gammadelta T cells unable to proliferate, migrate, and produce normal levels of growth factors. The observed impairment of skin gammadelta T cell function is directly related to the inhibitory action of rapamycin on mammalian target of rapamycin. Skin gammadelta T cells treated with rapamycin are refractory to IL-2 stimulation and attempt to survive in the absence of cytokine and growth factor signaling by undergoing autophagy. Normal wound closure can be restored in rapamycin-treated mice by addition of the skin gammadelta T cell-produced factor, insulin-like growth factor-1. These studies not only reveal that mammalian target of rapamycin is a master regulator of gammadelta T cell function but also provide a novel mechanism for the increased susceptibility to nonhealing wounds that occurs during rapamycin administration.

A heterotopic primate model for facial composite tissue transplantation

The purpose of this study was to develop a nonhuman primate model for heterotopic composite tissue facial transplantation in which to study the natural history of facial transplantation and evaluate immunosuppressive regimens.A composite oromandibular facial segment transplant based on the common carotid artery was evaluated. Flaps from 7 cynomolgus monkeys were transplanted to the groins of 7 recipients at the superficial femoral artery and vein. The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of thymoglobulin, rapamycin, and tacrolimus. Allograft survival ranged from 6 to 129 days. Histology performed in the long-term survivor at the time of necropsy revealed extensive inflammation and necrosis of the allograft skin; however, muscle and bone elements were viable, with minimal inflammation. This heterotopic facial transplantation model avoids the potential morbidity of mandibular resection and orthotopic facial transplantation. Our work also concurs with the work of other groups who found that the skin component is the most antigenic.

Immunosuppressive agents: effects on glucose and lipid metabolism

Immunosuppressive therapies are critical elements in successful organ transplantation. Although immunosuppressant drugs are essential in preventing graft rejection and graft maintenance after transplantation, their use is complicated by adverse effects, many being detrimental to graft and even patient long-term survival. Commonly used agents are associated with dysregulated glucose metabolism and dyslipidemia. This article focuses on the effects of immunosuppressive agents on glucose and lipid metabolism. Adrenal effects of these drugs, where known, also are discussed.

Angioedema in Renal Transplant Recipients on Sirolimus

BACKGROUND

Most drug-associated angioedemas are induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Recently, the responsibility of immunosuppressive agents given to transplant recipients in the development of angioedema has been discussed.

OBJECTIVE

To describe, in detail, angioedema episodes in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) on sirolimus.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study in a university hospital. Eighty consecutive RTRs on sirolimus were studied.

RESULTS

Angioedema without urticaria occurred a mean of 5 times in 12/80 (15%) RTRs taking sirolimus. It was predominantly located on the face (83%), with mucous membrane involvement in 7 (58%) patients, and was life threatening in 1. Another putative cofactor for angioedema without urticaria was identified in 9 (75%) patients: drugs (n=8), food allergy or physical activity (n=3). Tacrolimus intake was significantly associated with sirolimus-associated angioedema.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested a causal relationship between sirolimus and angioedema in RTRs.

Corticosteroid-sparing strategies in renal transplantation: are we still balancing rejection risk with improved tolerability?

Chronic allograft nephropathy and death with a functioning graft (mainly due to cardiovascular causes) are the most common causes of graft loss after the first year of renal transplantation. Immunosuppressants, and corticosteroids among them, contribute to an increase in cardiovascular risk because of their significant adverse effects, including hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and hyperglycaemia. Thus, corticosteroid discontinuation or avoidance has become a priority among the transplant community in order to enhance long-term graft and patient survival. Nevertheless, corticosteroid-sparing strategies may increase the risk of acute and chronic rejection and, thus, worsen the prognosis of transplant recipients. Initial attempts during the azathioprine epoch did not provide satisfactory results, as they were associated with high acute rejection rates, emphasising the risk of under-immunosuppression. The advent of new immunosuppressants, such as mycophenolate mofetil, mTOR inhibitors and anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies, have renewed the interest in corticosteroid-sparing protocols, and the results of new trials suggest that these corticosteroid-sparing strategies, even at an early stage after transplantation, are safe enough in view of the stable renal function and low rates of acute rejection reported. However, immunological risk factors, such as African American ethnicity, the presence of panel-reactive anti-HLA antibodies (even at low rates), and a history of previous acute rejection episodes should be taken into account and corticosteroid withdrawal strategies should be undertaken with caution. Long-term follow-up studies must be performed to confirm the encouraging short-term data.

Bloodstream infection following 217 consecutive systemic-enteric drained pancreas transplants

Background

Combined kidney pancreas transplantation (PTx) evolved as excellent treatment for diabetic nephropathy. Infections remain common and serious complications.

Methods

217 consecutive enteric drained PTxs performed from 1997 to 2004 were retrospectively analyzed with regard to bloodstream infection. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyteglobuline induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid and steroids for the majority of cases. Standard perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis consisted of pipercillin/tazobactam in combination with ciprofloxacin and fluconazole.

Results

One year patient, pancreas and kidney graft survival were 96.4%, 88.5% and 94.8%, surgical complication rate was 35%, rejection rate 30% and rate of infection 59%. In total 46 sepsis episodes were diagnosed in 35 patients (16%) with a median onset on day 12 (range 1–45) post transplant. Sepsis source was intraabdominal infection (IAI) (n = 21), a contaminated central venous line (n = 10), wound infection (n = 5), urinary tract infection (n = 2) and graft transmitted (n = 2). Nine patients (4%) experienced multiple episodes of sepsis. Overall 65 pathogens (IAI sepsis 39, line sepsis 15, others 11) were isolated from blood. Gram positive cocci accounted for 50 isolates (77%): Coagulase negative staphylococci (n = 28, i.e. 43%) (nine multi-resistant), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 11, i.e. 17%) (four multi-resistant), enterococci (n = 9, i.e. 14%) (one E. faecium). Gram negative rods were cultured in twelve cases (18%). Patients with blood borne infection had a two year pancreas graft survival of 76.5% versus 89.4% for those without sepsis (p = 0.036), patient survival was not affected.

Conclusion

Sepsis remains a serious complication after PTx with significantly reduced pancreas graft, but not patient survival. The most common source is IAI.

Acne in recipients of renal transplantation treated with sirolimus: Clinical, microbiologic, histologic, therapeutic, and pathogenic aspects

We evaluated the clinical characteristics of sirolimus-induced acne in 80 recipients of renal transplantation. It developed in 36 of 48 (75%) men and 2 of 32 (6%) women. Lesion locations and clinical, bacteriologic, and histologic features differentiated sirolimus-induced acne from acne vulgaris, but therapeutic management was similar. The main limitation for this study was the absence of a control group without sirolimus. Epidermal growth factor inhibition by sirolimus is a plausible explanation for this acne.

Rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor, disrupts triglyceride metabolism in guinea pigs

This study was designed to define some of the mechanisms by which rapamycin (RAPA), an mTOR inhibitor, induces hypertriglyceridemia when used as an immunosuppressive or antiproliferative agent and to determine whether low doses result in less undesirable side effects. Thirty male guinea pigs (n=10 per group) were randomly assigned to control (no RAPA), low-RAPA (0.08 mg/d), or high-RAPA (0.85 mg/d) treatment for 3 weeks. Rapamycin treatment resulted in more than a 2-fold increase in plasma triglycerides (TG) (P<.01), whereas no differences were observed in plasma cholesterol between RAPA and control groups. Low-RAPA treatment resulted in lower concentrations of cholesterol in the aorta (28.6%) and lower hepatic acyl-CoA cholesteryl acyltransferase activity compared to control and high-RAPA groups (P<.01). In addition, acyl-CoA cholesteryl acyltransferase activity was positively correlated with aortic cholesterol (r=0.43, P<.05). In contrast, aortic TG concentrations were higher in RAPA-treated guinea pigs than in control (P<.01). Very low density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein particles isolated from guinea pigs treated with RAPA were larger in size and contained more TG molecules than particles from control animals. Interestingly, plasma free fatty acids and fasting plasma glucose were 65% and 72% higher in the high-RAPA group than in control (P<.01). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha concentrations in the aorta were 3.6- and 10.4-fold higher in the low-RAPA and high-RAPA groups than in control guinea pigs (P<.01). These results suggest that RAPA interferes with TG metabolism by altering the insulin signaling pathway, inducing increased secretion of very low density lipoprotein and promoting deposition of TG in the aorta. Low RAPA was found to decrease cholesterol accumulation in tissue (liver and aorta) compared to high RAPA, suggesting that lower doses could be less detrimental to transplant patients.

Onychopathie associée au sirolimus chez les transplantés rénaux

INTRODUCTION

A large number of drugs may be responsible for the development of nail changes. Sirolimus is an immunosuppressive drug recently developed in organ transplantation. Herein, we evaluate sirolimus-induced nail abnormalities in renal transplant recipients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The nails of 80 consecutive renal transplant recipients receiving sirolimus have been evaluated in a systematic dermatological study in 2003. The patients were mainly men (60%) with a mean age of 48 years. The mean duration of the graft was 6 years and of sirolimus treatment 18 months. Mycophenolate mofetil and steroids were combined with sirolimus in 86% of patients.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients (74%) complained for nail alterations. The most frequent anomalies (88%) were matrix alterations including slow growth, onychomalacia, onychorrexis, and leukonychia. Nail bed alterations (onycholysis), vascular phenomenon (erythema, splinter hemorrhages), and periungual anomalies (mainly pyogenic granulomas) were observed in 42, 42 and 19% of cases respectively. One observation of type 1 photo-onycholysis was described.

DISCUSSION

This study reports a new drug-induced onychopathy. Responsibility of sirolimus is highly suggested. The main pathogenesis hypothesis to explain these nail alterations is inhibition of EGF (epidermal growth factor) pathway by sirolimus.

Voriconazole and Sirolimus Coadministration after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Sirolimus is increasingly used in transplantation for prevention and treatment of graft-versus-host disease and organ rejection. Voriconazole is contraindicated when used concomitantly with sirolimus because of a substantial increase in sirolimus drug exposure with unadjusted dosing, but voriconazole is also considered the best initial treatment of invasive aspergillosis and other fungal infections. Patients who received voriconazole and sirolimus concomitantly were identified by a review of the medical records of all allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients at our institution from September 1, 2002, to June 1, 2005. Data including baseline characteristics, indications for both drugs, and potential adverse effects were evaluated. Eleven patients received voriconazole and sirolimus concomitantly for a median of 33 days (range, 3-100 days). In 8 patients whose sirolimus dose was initially reduced by 90%, trough sirolimus levels were similar to those obtained before the administration of voriconazole; no obvious significant toxicity from either drug was observed during coadministration. Serious adverse events were observed in 2 patients in whom sirolimus dosing was not adjusted during voriconazole administration. Sirolimus and voriconazole may be safely coadministered if there is an empiric initial 90% sirolimus dose reduction combined with systematic monitoring of trough levels.

Sirolimus: the evidence for clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring

This review seeks to apply a decision-making algorithm to establish whether clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring (CPM) of sirolimus (rapamycin) in solid organ transplantation is indicated in specific patient populations. The need for CPM of sirolimus, although a regulatory requirement in Europe, has not yet been firmly established in North America and other parts of the world. Sirolimus has demonstrated immunosuppressive efficacy in renal, pancreatic islet cell, liver and heart transplant recipients. The pharmacological response of immunosuppressive therapy with sirolimus cannot be readily evaluated; however, a relationship between trough blood sirolimus concentrations, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the incidence of rejection has been proposed. Furthermore, sirolimus can be measured in whole blood by several assays--high-performance liquid chromatography with detection by tandem mass spectrometry, or with ultraviolet detection, radioreceptor assay or microparticle enzyme immunoassay. Both experimental animal and clinical data suggest that adverse events and their associated severity are correlated with blood concentrations. To prevent rejection and minimise toxicity, a therapeutic range of 4-12 microg/L (measured via chromatographic assays) is recommended when sirolimus is used in conjunction with ciclosporin. If ciclosporin therapy is discontinued, a target trough range of 12-20 microg/L is recommended. Sirolimus pharmacokinetics display large inter- and intrapatient variability, which may change in specific patient populations due to disease states or concurrent immunosuppressants or other interacting drugs. Due to the long half-life of sirolimus, dosage adjustments would ideally be based on trough levels obtained more than 5-7 days after initiation of therapy or dosage change. Once the initial dose titration is complete, monitoring sirolimus trough concentrations weekly for the first month and every 2 weeks for the second month appears to be appropriate. After the first 2 months of dose titration, routine CPM of sirolimus is not necessary in all patients, but may be warranted to achieve target concentrations in certain populations of patients, but the frequency of further monitoring remains to be determined and should be individualised.

Oncolytic virotherapy for cancer treatment: challenges and solutions

Advances in gene modification and viral therapy have led to the development of a variety of vectors in several viral families that are capable of replication specifically in tumor cells. Because of the nature of viral delivery, infection, and replication, this technology, oncolytic virotherapy, may prove valuable for treating cancer patients, especially those with inoperable tumors. Current limitations exist, however, for oncolytic virotherapy. They include the body's B and T cell responses, innate inflammatory reactions, host range, safety risks involved in using modified viruses as treatments, and the requirement that most currently available oncolytic viruses require local administration. Another important constraint is that genetically enhanced vectors may or may not adhere to their replication restrictions in long-term applications. Several solutions and strategies already exist, however, to minimize or circumvent many of these limitations, supporting viral oncolytic therapy as a viable option and powerful tool in the fight against cancer.

Posttransplantation chronic renal damage in nonrenal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The growing problem of relentless deterioration of renal function in patients who undergo transplantation of nonrenal solid organs is bound to have an increasingly important impact as it may not only worsen patient morbidity and mortality but also increase transplantation costs.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature in order to provide a sum of the most important data on the incidence, clinical picture, renal pathology pattern, damage mechanisms, and risk factors, along with strategies for prevention and treatment of chronic renal damage following nonrenal solid organ transplantation.

RESULTS

Literature data report that 10% to 80% of transplanted patients have some degree of renal dysfunction and that they share a common clinical picture characterized by relentless asymptomatic progression, frequent hypertension, mild urinary abnormalities, and pathology features of vascular, glomerular, tubular, and interstitial involvement. These changes are very similar to those reported for chronic nephrotoxicity from calcineurin inhibitors. The occurrence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring chronic dialysis has been reported in up to 20% of nonrenal transplant recipients. Although there are some organ-specific differences, a group of common risk factors has been recognized, including the use of calcineurin inhibitors as immunosuppressive agents, age, pretransplantation renal function, intraoperative/perioperative factors, concomitant use of other nephrotoxic drugs, infections, and posttransplantation acute renal failure.

CONCLUSION

Calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity is a growing problem and, as the age of recipients of nonrenal organs is increasing, this problem is destined to increase. It would therefore be advisable for nephrologists to share their experiences in immunomodulation with other specialties, so as to favor the cautious extension of calcineurin inhibitor-sparing protocols to the area of life-saving transplants.

The Impact of Mycophenolate Mofetil on Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been used in kidney and pancreas transplantation for almost 10 years. In the pivotal phase III trials, MMF use was accompanied by a dramatic reduction of rejection rates in kidney transplantation; however, the impact on graft and patient was undetermined. Analyses of the United States Renal Data System and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients databases later provided a valuable measure of the impact of MMF in improving outcomes. In this review, we provide a synopsis of the prospective studies, including but not limited to the pivotal MMF approval trials, and analyses of the national transplant registries relevant to the long-term impact of MMF in kidney transplantation. Indeed, a substantial body of evidence has shown MMF treatment improves patient survival, graft survival, and death-censored graft survival in kidney transplantation. The beneficial effects of MMF have been particularly notable in high-risk recipients such as African Americans. In coming years, these benefits will require reevaluation in the context of the growing use of novel protocols combining MMF with tacrolimus or sirolimus.

Sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus is associated with worse renal allograft survival compared to mycophenolate mofetil combined with tacrolimus

Cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity is enhanced by sirolimus (SRL). Tacrolimus is perceived to be less nephrotoxic than CsA, and therefore, CsA has been largely replaced by tacrolimus (TAC) when calcineurin inhibitors are used with SRL. We analyzed 44 915 adult renal transplants in the Scientific Renal Transplant Registry (SRTR) from 2000 to 2004. Three thousand five hundred twenty-four (7.8%) patients received a baseline immunosuppressive regimen of TAC/SRL, with an inferior overall (log-rank p<0.001) and death-censored graft survival (p<0.001) as compared to TAC/MMF (N=27 007). This effect was confirmed in multivariate Cox models; the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) for overall graft loss with TAC/SRL was 1.47 (95% CI=1.32, 1.63) and for CsA/SRL 1.38 (95% CI=1.20, 1.59) relative to TAC/MMF. These effects were most apparent in high-risk transplants. Six-month acute rejection rates were low (11.5-12.6%) and not different between groups. In summary, national data indicate that TAC/SRL as compared to TAC/MMF is associated with significantly worse renal allograft survival in all subgroups of patients and, in particular, higher-risk transplants. These results have to be interpreted in the context of the inherent limitations of any retrospective database analysis and evaluated in context with data from prospective clinical trials.

Dexamethasone Induces IL-10-Producing Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells with Durable Immaturity

It is highly desirable that immature dendritic cells (DC) used for tolerance induction maintain steady immature state with predominant interleukin (IL)-10 production. In this study, we attempted to develop DC with durable immaturity and other tolerogenic features by using dexamethasone (Dex). We found DC derived from human monocytes in the presence of 10(-7) m Dex were negative for CD1a. Compared with control transduced DC (Ctrl-DC), Dex-DC expressed lower CD40, CD80 and CD86 but equivalent human leucocyte antigen-DR. Both immature Dex- and Ctrl-DC did not express CD83. Nevertheless, upon stimulation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or CD40 ligand, the expression of CD40, CD80, CD83 and CD86 was upregulated on Ctrl-DC but not on Dex-DC. The immaturity of Dex-DC was durable following Dex removal. Interestingly, Dex-DC maintained production of large amount of IL-10 and little IL-12 five days after Dex removed. Further study indicated that high-level IL-10 production by Dex-DC was associated with high-level phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) as blockade of this enzyme markedly attenuated IL-10 production. Furthermore, Dex-DC sustained the capability of high phosphorylation of ERK and IL-10 production 5 days after Dex removal. In addition, Dex-DC had significantly lower activity in stimulating T-cell proliferation. Neutralization of IL-10, to some extent, promoted DC maturation activated by LPS, as well as T-cell stimulatory activity of Dex-DC. The above findings suggest that IL-10-producing Dex-DC with durable immaturity are potentially useful for induction of immune tolerance.

Rapamycin ameliorates proteinuria-associated tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis in experimental membranous nephropathy

Proteinuria is a risk factor for progression of chronic renal failure. A model of proteinuria-associated tubulointerstitial injury was developed and was used to examine the therapeutic effect of rapamycin. Two studies were performed. In study A, proteinuric rats were given sheep anti-Fx1A to induce experimental membranous nephropathy; control rats received normal sheep serum. Four weeks later, groups were subdivided and underwent laparotomy alone (two kidneys), nephrectomy alone (one kidney), or nephrectomy with polectomy (0.6 kidney). Renal function and morphology were evaluated 4 wk later. Whereas control rats never developed proteinuria, anti-Fx1A induced severe proteinuria. Proteinuria was unaffected by renal mass reduction. Proteinuric rats developed tubulointerstitial disease that was most severe in rats with 0.6 kidneys. Renal function (GFR) was reduced by loss of renal mass and was reduced further in proteinuric rats with 0.6 kidneys. In study B, the effect of rapamycin on the expression of candidate proinflammatory and profibrotic genes and the progression of proteinuria-associated renal disease were examined. All rats received an injection of anti-Fx1A and were nephrectomized and then divided into groups to receive rapamycin or vehicle. Gene expression, renal morphology, and GFR were evaluated after 4, 8, and 12 wk. Rapamycin reduced expression of the proinflammatory and profibrotic genes (monocyte chemotactic protein-1, vascular endothelial growth factor, PDGF, TGF-beta(1), and type 1 collagen). Tubulointerstitial inflammation and progression of interstitial fibrosis that were present in vehicle-treated rats were ameliorated by rapamycin. Rapamycin also completely inhibited compensatory renal hypertrophy. In summary, rapamycin ameliorates the tubulointerstitial disease associated with chronic proteinuria and loss of renal mass.

Rapamycin successfully treats post-transplant autoimmune hepatitis

Rapamycin (Rapa), one of the newer immunosuppressants has been found to control and prevent autoimmune features in animal models. This is the first report describing the successful control of post-transplant autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) with Rapa. Post-transplant AIH is diagnosed in the presence of raised transaminases, elevated immunoglobulin G, presence of autoantibodies and histologic changes consistent with AIH on liver biopsy. It may represent a recurrence of the original AIH that led to transplantation or present as a de novo AIH after liver transplant. Post-transplant AIH has conventionally been treated with Prednisolone (Pred) and Azathioprine (AZA). In this report, tailoring of immunosuppression after diagnosis of post-transplant AIH is described with special emphasis on those treated successfully with Rapa. Fifteen of 21 patients responded to treatment with an increase in dose of Pred and addition of AZA or Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) to calcineurin inhibitor. Five non-responders and one other patient with post-transplant AIH were treated with addition of Rapa. All six responded to treatment but drug was withdrawn in one patient. Adverse events were minimal. Rapa may prove to be an important addition in the control of autoimmune liver disease.

Management of hyperglycaemia after pancreas transplantation: are new immunosuppressants the answer?

Pancreas transplantation is considered the optimal therapy for patients with diabetes mellitus who reach end-stage renal disease. Despite achievement of euglycaemia after this procedure, the progression to impaired pancreatic function and metabolic exhaustion still represents one of the major concerns that increase the risk of graft loss. This paper reviews the possible mechanisms that can induce post-transplant hyperglycaemia, including those related to immunosuppression and those non-related, and the new strategies available for minimising or preventing this complication. Different aetiologies can induce pancreatic dysfunction. Technical complications, acute pancreatitis and delayed graft function, mostly related to impaired insulin secretion, are considered the early causes for abnormal glucose control. In general, acute rejection does not affect the endocrine portion of the pancreas graft because islet destruction occurs later than the inflammation of the exocrine components. Hyperinsulinaemia and insulin resistance represent the main concern for the progression of blood glucose intolerance. The anastomotic techniques of the exocrine portion of the pancreas and the immunosuppressive regimens are of critical importance for the development of impaired glucose metabolism. Hyperinsulinaemia, as a result of the fact that systemic-enteric or systemic-bladder drainages reducing the hepatic clearance of insulin, has led to the introduction of more physiological techniques using portal drainage of the endocrine secretions. Experimental and clinical data have shown that many of the current immunosuppressants account, to a large degree, for the increased risk of the development of post-transplant hyperglycaemia. The most common maintenance regimen in pancreatic transplantation still consists of triple therapy with a combination of corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors (either ciclosporin [cyclosporine] or tacrolimus), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).The diabetogenic effects of corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors have resulted in the need for protocols able to minimise their use. Recent studies have shown the safety and efficacy of steroid-sparing or -free regimens. Sirolimus has shown powerful immunosuppressive potency in absence of nephrotoxicity and diabetogenicity. Multicentre and single-centre reports have demonstrated that both calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal and avoidance were possible when sirolimus was used in a concentration-controlled fashion, with low-dose corticosteroids and MMF. Although the experience with sirolimus in pancreatic transplantation is still limited, the results are promising. Patients affected by diabetic gastroparesis seem to better tolerate a regimen with sirolimus and low-dose tacrolimus than one with tacrolimus in combination with MMF.For successful, long-term results of pancreatic transplantation, it is crucial to combine donor selection, technical aspects, modified anastomotic techniques and new therapeutic approaches designed to minimise the metabolic and non-metabolic adverse effects of the immunosuppressive regimens.

Distinct signaling events downstream of mTOR cooperate to mediate the effects of amino acids and insulin on initiation factor 4E-binding proteins

Signaling through the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) controls cell size and growth as well as other functions, and it is a potential therapeutic target for graft rejection, certain cancers, and disorders characterized by inappropriate cell or tissue growth. mTOR signaling is positively regulated by hormones or growth factors and amino acids. mTOR signaling regulates the phosphorylation of several proteins, the best characterized being ones that control mRNA translation. Eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) undergoes phosphorylation at multiple sites. Here we show that amino acids regulate the N-terminal phosphorylation sites in 4E-BP1 through the RAIP motif in a rapamycin-insensitive manner. Several criteria indicate this reflects a rapamycin-insensitive output from mTOR. In contrast, the insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of the C-terminal site Ser64/65 is generally sensitive to rapamycin, as is phosphorylation of another well-characterized target for mTOR signaling, S6K1. Our data imply that it is unlikely that mTOR directly phosphorylates Thr69/70 in 4E-BP1. Although 4E-BP1 and S6K1 bind the mTOR partner, raptor, our data indicate that the outputs from mTOR to 4E-BP1 and S6K1 are distinct. In cells, efficient phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 requires it to be able to bind to eIF4E, whereas phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 by mTOR in vitro shows no such preference. These data have important implications for understanding signaling downstream of mTOR and the development of new strategies to impair mTOR signaling.

Cutaneous adverse events in renal transplant recipients receiving sirolimus-based therapy

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus is an immunosuppressive drug recently developed for organ transplantation. Its mechanism of action, independent of calcineurin, is different from that of cyclosporine and tacrolimus, two calcineurin inhibitors (CIs). Because the toxicity of CIs is partly the result of calcineurin blockade, sirolimus exhibits a different toxicity profile. In this study, we evaluated the profile, frequency, and severity of cutaneous adverse events in renal transplant recipients receiving sirolimus-based therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic and in-depth evaluation of skin, mucous membranes, nails, and hair was performed in 80 renal transplant recipients receiving sirolimus-based therapy. The mean duration of the graft was 6 years and of sirolimus treatment was 18 months. Mycophenolate mofetil and steroids were combined with sirolimus for 74 patients. Sirolimus was used as first immunosuppressive therapy for 36 patients, and 44 patients were switched from CIs to sirolimus.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients (99%) experienced cutaneous adverse events. Twenty patients (25%) demonstrated serious adverse events, and six patients (7%) stopped sirolimus during the 3 months after the study because of cutaneous events. The most frequent of these were pilosebaceous apparatus involvement, including acne-like eruptions (46%), scalp folliculitis (26%), and hidradenitis suppurativa (12%); edematous complaints, including chronic edemas (55%) and angioedema (15%); mucous membrane disorders, including aphthous ulceration (60%), epistaxis (60%), chronic gingivitis (20%), and chronic fissure of the lips (11%); and last, nail disorders including chronic onychopathy (74%) and periungual infections (16%).

CONCLUSIONS

Skin disorders are frequent in renal transplant recipients receiving sirolimus as a long-term therapy. Despite the usually mild nature of skin events, they are often the reason for stopping sirolimus.

A multicenter pilot study of early (4-day) steroid cessation in renal transplant recipients under simulect, tacrolimus and sirolimus

This study presents the first prospective multicenter study assessing sirolimus-based immunosuppression with early (4-day) corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD) in renal transplantation. Immunosuppression included: anti-IL-2 receptor antibody and tacrolimus/sirolimus. Inclusion criteria included adult primary recipients. Exclusion criteria included: (i) African Americans, (ii) current PRA >50%, (iii) multiple organ transplants, (iv) WBC < 3000 cells/microL and (v) fasting hypercholesterolemia/hypertriglyceridemia. The primary endpoints were acute rejection and the proportion of patients off corticosteroids. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled: mean age of 49.7 +/- 12 years. Transplants included: cadaveric (26%) and living donor (74%). Patient and graft survival were 100%. Biopsy proven acute rejection occurred in 13%; presumptive rejection in 10.5%. Banff grades included: IA (seven patients), IB (one patient), IIA (one patient) and IIB (one patient). Renal function at 1 year: serum creatinine (1.18 +/- 0.06 mg/dL). Mean weight gain was minimal at 1 year: 3 +/- 2 kg/patient. Mild increases in total, LDL and HDL cholesterol were observed and new antilipid agent use occurred in 26 patients. In conclusion, early CSWD under tacrolimus/sirolimus-based immunosuppression in selected, low-risk renal transplant recipients provides: (i) excellent patient and graft survival, (ii) good renal function, (iii) reduced hyperlipidemia and antilipid agent use and (iv) low acute rejection rates.

Testosterone concentrations and sirolimus in male renal transplant patients

Sirolimus damages the testes in animals; however, human data are sparse. We conducted a case-control study to obtain further insight into this issue and compared testosterone, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and prolactin concentrations in matched renal transplant patients who did or did not receive sirolimus. We found that testosterone values were lower (11.2 +/- 6.3 nmol/L vs. 15.5 +/- 7.7 nmol/L, p < 0.05), in 28 sirolimus-treated patients, compared to 28 non-sirolimus-treated controls. Furthermore, these patients more commonly had testosterone concentrations that were below our reference value for normal men. In contrast, FSH and LH concentrations were higher while prolactin levels were not different. These data are consistent with sirolimus-related testosterone suppression and suggest a need for further studies.