Combined effect of rapamycin and FK 506 in prolongation of small bowel graft survival in the mouse

Treatment with Tacrolimus and Sirolimus Reveals No Additional Adverse Effects on Human Islets In Vitro Compared to Each Drug Alone but They Are Reduced by Adding Glucocorticoids

Tacrolimus and sirolimus are important immunosuppressive drugs used in human islet transplantation; however, they are linked to detrimental effects on islets and reduction of long-term graft function. Few studies investigate the direct effects of these drugs combined in parallel with single drug exposure. Human islets were treated with or without tacrolimus (30 μg/L), sirolimus (30 μg/L), or a combination thereof for 24 hrs. Islet function as well as apoptosis was assessed by glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) and Cell Death ELISA. Proinflammatory cytokines were analysed by qRT-PCR and Bio-Plex. Islets exposed to the combination of sirolimus and tacrolimus were treated with or without methylprednisolone (1000 μg/L) and the expression of the proinflammatory cytokines was investigated. We found the following: (i) No additive reduction in function and viability in islets existed when tacrolimus and sirolimus were combined compared to the single drug. (ii) Increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines mRNA and protein levels in islets took place. (iii) Methylprednisolone significantly decreased the proinflammatory response in islets induced by the drug combination. Although human islets are prone to direct toxic effect of tacrolimus and sirolimus, we found no additive effects of the drug combination. Short-term exposure of glucocorticoids could effectively reduce the proinflammatory response in human islets induced by the combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus.

The use of sirolimus as a rescue therapy in pediatric intestinal transplant recipients

To review our experience with SRL as a second-line therapy in our series of 45 SBTx recipients (1997-2009). Retrospective review of five children converted to SRL: 3 M/2 F; median of three yr old (range 20 months-18 yr); rescue indications, adverse events with SRL, resolution of tacrolimus-related side effects, incidence of rejection, PTLD, or GVHD were summarized. Tacrolimus was discontinued (average 13 months after transplant) because of refractory hemolytic anemia in four patients with decreased renal function and because of advanced renal failure and unclear neutropenia in one. PTLD and GVHD had been previously diagnosed in two. Tacrolimus-related side effects disappeared in all five although other immunosuppressants and splenectomy were used simultaneously or later in most of them. Adverse events reported after the conversion were infections (tuberculosis and Pneumocystis carinii in two) and mild hypertriglyceridemia. No rejection, GVHD, or PTLD episode was observed. Four patients are alive with excellent quality of life (median follow-up 18 months). Sirolimus is a safe rescue therapy in SBTx children when tacrolimus is not well tolerated. Renal function and hematologic disorders seem to improve, although other simultaneous strategies could be also involved. Further studies could demonstrate its efficacy as a first-line treatment.

Rapamycin in islet transplantation: friend or foe?

The Edmonton protocol was undoubtedly a major step forward in the history of islet transplantation. Its immunosuppression regimen was largely based on the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin (sirolimus), which remains the most frequently used immunosuppressive drug in clinical islet transplant protocols. As time reveals the somewhat disappointing long-term results achieved with the Edmonton protocol, a number of publications have appeared addressing the potential beneficial or deleterious role of rapamycin on islet cell engraftment, function survival and regeneration, as well as on its side-effects in human subjects. This paper reviews the sometimes contradictory evidence on the impact of rapamycin in islet transplantation.

Sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus and corticosteroids for the treatment of resistant chronic graft-versus-host disease

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in haematopoietic transplant recipients. Sirolimus is a macrocyclic triene antibiotic with immunosuppressive, antifungal and antitumour properties, that has activity in the prevention and treatment of acute GVHD. We conducted a phase II trial of sirolimus combined with tacrolimus and methylprednisolone in patients with steroid-resistant cGVHD. Thirty-five patients who developed GVHD after day 100 post-transplant were studied. Six patients had a complete response and 16 a partial response with an overall response rate of 63%. Major adverse events related to the combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus were hyperlipidaemia, renal dysfunction and cytopenias. Four patients had thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) and 27 (77%) had infectious complications. The median survival for the whole group was 15 months. A significantly better outcome was observed in patients with a platelet count > or = 100 x 10(9)/l, as well as in those with true chronic manifestations of GVHD compared to those with acute GVHD beyond day 100. Controlled trials comparing this approach with alternative strategies to determine which can best achieve the goal of GVHD-free survival are warranted.

Observations regarding the use of sirolimus and tacrolimus in high-risk cadaveric renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Balancing the risk of acute rejection (AR) with drug-induced toxicities complicates the selection of the optimal immunosuppressive regimen, especially in the high-risk renal transplant recipient. This study was designed to determine the optimal dosage combinations of tacrolimus and sirolimus in a high-risk cadaveric renal transplant population.

METHODS

Primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients were randomly assigned to receive either standard tacrolimus (trough levels of 10-15 ng/mL) plus reduced sirolimus (trough levels of 5-10 ng,mL) (Group I) or to receive reduced tacrolimus (trough levels of 5-10 ng,mL) plus standard sirolimus (trough levels of 10-15 ng/mL) (Group II). All patients received Thymoglobulin induction and steroids.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine (16 in Group I and 23 in Group II) high-risk renal transplant recipients (100% cadaveric donors, 79% African-American recipients, and 59% delayed graft function) are the subjects of this report. At 6 months, the patient survival rate was 94 and 100% and the graft survival rate was 94 and 83% in Groups I and II, respectively. The incidence of biopsy-proven AR was 6 and 5% in Groups I and II, respectively. Eight patients (50%) in Group I required discontinuation of tacrolimus, seven because of biopsy-proven tacrolimus nephrotoxicity and one secondarily to interstitial pneumonitis. Wound complications were the most frequent adverse event reported in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus was associated with a low risk of AR in this cohort of high-risk renal transplant recipients. However, 50% of patients who received standard tacrolimus and reduced sirolimus combination had to be discontinued from the regimen because of biopsy-proven nephrotoxicity. These preliminary results provide evidence that sirolimus should not be added to tacrolimus without dosage adjustments. We have discontinued recruitment of patients to the standard tacrolimus and reduced sirolimus combination and we have tightened our criteria for selection of marginal donor kidneys with our high-risk renal transplant recipients.

Immunosuppression for pancreatic islet transplantation

Protocols for islet transplantation have to take into account the diabetogenicity/islet toxicity of the immunosuppressive agents, namely corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors, most notably tacrolimus. The development by the Edmonton group of a sirolimus-based, steroid-free, low-tacrolimus regimen was a significant breakthrough that allowed the rate of insulin independence after islet transplantation to increase from 13% to 80% at 1 year. Drawbacks include the side effects of sirolimus and the reduction in insulin independence to 50% at 3 years, the latter being attributed to prolonged tacrolimus exposure. Currently explored alternatives to tacrolimus include cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and the novel agent FTY 720. Perspectives for the near future involve the achievement of "prope tolerance" by strategies using lymphocyte-depleting antibodies (anti-thymocyte globulin, campath-1H, hOKT3gamma1 [ala,ala]), or costimulatory blockade (anti-CD154 mAbs, CTLA4-Ig).

Islet transplantation in patients with diabetes mellitus: choice of immunosuppression

Islet transplantation offers patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus freedom from long-term insulin therapy and a degree of metabolic control that is far superior to injected insulin. The hope is that near-perfect glucose control sustained over time will prevent progression of secondary diabetic complications. The selection of optimal immunosuppressive agents for islet transplantation has been a formidable challenge, given the need to overcome both autoimmune and alloimmune barriers, as well as the potential toxicity of immunosuppressive agents on transplanted islets. Early strategies relied on protocols that had proven success in solid organ transplantation and consisted of azathioprine, cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Under these protocols, fewer than 10% of patients were able to achieve insulin independence. The development of the 'Edmonton Protocol' dramatically transformed clinical outcomes in islet transplantation in recent years through the introduction of a more potent, less diabetogenic, and corticosteroid-free immunosuppressive regimen consisting of sirolimus, low-dose tacrolimus, and induction anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody. While insulin independence rates under this protocol have been highly successful, patients must be maintained on lifelong immunosuppression. While the risk of malignancy, post-transplant lymphoma and sepsis have been low and diminishing in transplanted patients to date, fears of these complications and a host of drug-related adverse effects have precluded broader application. Patients undergoing islet transplantation today must exchange insulin for chronic immunosuppressive therapy, and therefore the procedure can only be justified in patients with very unstable forms of diabetes, or in those with another solid organ allograft who already endure the risks of immunosuppression. Advances in more specific and less toxic immunosuppressive agents together with progress in better understanding the biology of diabetes will lead to more suitable strategies to control both alloimmune and recurrent autoimmune reactions. These protocols, ultimately aimed at establishing tolerance, are an essential pre-requisite to move towards providing islet transplantation earlier in the course of the disease, including transplantation in children. This review addresses the evolution of immunosuppressive strategies in islet transplantation, and highlights some novel agents in pre-clinical development or in early clinical trials that may offer considerable promise in facilitating the induction of tolerance.

Sirolimus, tacrolimus, and low-dose methotrexate for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in mismatched related donor or unrelated donor transplantation

We studied the feasibility and activity of adding sirolimus to tacrolimus and low-dose methotrexate as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in recipients of alternative donor transplants. Forty-one patients with hematologic malignancies were conditioned with cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation. Marrow stem cells were from an HLA-A, -B, and -DR compatible, unrelated donor (n = 26, 68%), from a 5 of 6 antigen-matched unrelated donor (n = 8, 20%), or from a 5 of 6 antigen-matched family member (n = 5, 12%). Therapeutic serum levels of sirolimus were attained in most patients. All evaluable patients engrafted. An absolute neutrophil count of 500/microL was achieved on day +18 (range, 11-32 days). Sustained platelet counts of more than 20 000/ microL were attained on day +29 (range, 14-98 days). Grades 0-I acute GVHD occurred in 75% of patients. Grades II, III, and IV acute GVHD occurred in 13%, 8%, and 5%, respectively (total grades II-IV GVHD, 26%). Median survival is 366 days (95% CI 185, not estimable) and actuarial survival at 1 year is 52%. Oral sirolimus is tolerable, adequate blood levels are achievable, and there is a low rate of acute GVHD compared with historical data in this high-risk population. This novel agent is worthy of further study in allogeneic transplantation.

Observations on the use of sirolimus and tacrolimus in high-risk renal transplant recipients

Sirolimus is the first of a group of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors to be introduced for clinical use in the United States. At the University of Tennessee in Memphis, we have evolved strategies for the use of sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients; which utilize the drug as a primary immunosuppressant and exploit its potential for preserving renal function. Conversions from the calcineurins to sirolimusbased immunosuppression established the efficacy of calcineurin-free immunosuppressants in selected high-risk patients. The conversion experience stimulated the design of protocols for primary use of sirolimus. Posttransplant use of sirolimus was associated with low incidence of rejection whether sirolimus was used with low-dose Prograf or in calcineurin-free protocols. Primary use with full-dose Prograf was associated with a high incidence of calcineurin-related nephrotoxicity and was abandoned in our program. Hematologic and lipid side effects were manageable, as was an observed increase in wound-healing problems and lymphocele formation. Continuous modifications of the sirolimus protocols to increase our benefit-to-risk ratio are ongoing and indicate a continued role for the drug in posttransplant immune suppression.

Intestinal transplantation before and after the introduction of sirolimus

INTRODUCTION

Small bowel transplantation has been limited by high rates of rejection and graft loss. In June 2000, we began using sirolimus, an immunosuppression agent with proven efficacy in kidney transplantation. We reviewed results among intestinal transplant recipients before and after the introduction of sirolimus.

METHODS

Thirty-one intestinal transplants were performed in 29 patients at our center between July 1998 and April 2001. All patients were followed for at least 30 days posttransplant. In the first 19 transplants (group 1), patients received tacrolimus, steroids, and antibody induction therapy (either daclizumab or OKT3). In the next 12 consecutive transplants (group 2), patients received tacrolimus, steroids, basiliximab, and sirolimus.

RESULTS

Eighteen children (7 males and 11 females, mean age 2.1+/-2.2 years) and 11 adults (9 males and 2 females, mean age 38.1+/-12.4 years) underwent transplantation. All patients survived transplantation. The overall reoperation rate was 1.7 procedures per patient in group 1 and 1.1 procedures per patient in group 2. The most common indications were abscess (n=7), planned second look (n=7), leaks/fistulas (n=6), dehiscence (n=6), obstruction (n=4), ischemic bowel (n=3), perforations (n=3), stomal complications (n=3), and graft removal (n=3). The incidence of biopsy-proven rejection in the first 30 days was 73.7% in group 1 and 16.7% in group 2 (P<0.002). Sirolimus was temporarily held or discontinued in 66.7% of patients. Actuarial 1-year graft survival was 91.7% with sirolimus and 57.9% without sirolimus (P<0.04). Actuarial 1-year patient survival was 91.7% with sirolimus and 79% without sirolimus (P=0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

An immunosuppressive regimen that includes sirolimus has improved graft survival. Furthermore, this regimen has significantly decreased the incidence of early rejection and has eliminated early graft loss caused by fulminant rejection.

Pancreatic islet transplantation in the treatment of diabetes mellitus

This chapter reviews current developments and future directions in clinical islet transplantation. With the recent introduction of glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive therapies and improved methods for islet isolation, the success of the procedure has increased substantially. Challenges ahead include progress with international multicentre trials, development of single donor protocols, progress in clinical tolerance based therapies to lower overall risk of immunosuppression, and ultimately finding an alternative source to provide effective therapy for more patients with diabetes. Recent advances in stem cell biology and xenotransplantation may soon provide this opportunity.

Islet transplantation in seven patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen

BACKGROUND

Registry data on patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus who undergo pancreatic islet transplantation indicate that only 8 percent are free of the need for insulin therapy at one year.

METHODS

Seven consecutive patients with type 1 diabetes and a history of severe hypoglycemia and metabolic instability underwent islet transplantation in conjunction with a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen consisting of sirolimus, tacrolimus, and daclizumab. Islets were isolated by ductal perfusion with cold, purified collagenase, digested and purified in xenoprotein-free medium, and transplanted immediately by means of a percutaneous transhepatic portal embolization.

RESULTS

All seven patients quickly attained sustained insulin independence after transplantation of a mean (+/-SD) islet mass of 11,547+/-1604 islet equivalents per kilogram of body weight (median follow-up, 11.9 months; range, 4.4 to 14.9). All recipients required islets from two donor pancreases, and one required a third transplant from two donors to achieve sustained insulin independence. The mean glycosylated hemoglobin values were normal after transplantation in all recipients. The mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (a measure of fluctuations in blood glucose concentrations) was significantly decreased after the attainment of insulin independence (from 198+/-32 mg per deciliter [11.1+/-1.8 mmol per liter] before transplantation to 119+/-37 mg per deciliter [6.7+/-2.1 mmol per liter] after the first transplantation and 51+/-30 mg per deciliter [2.8+/-1.7 mmol per liter] after the attainment of insulin independence; P<0.001). There were no further episodes of hypoglycemic coma. Complications were minor, and there were no significant increases in lipid concentrations during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations in patients with type 1 diabetes indicate that islet transplantation can result in insulin independence with excellent metabolic control when glucocorticoid-free immunosuppression is combined with the infusion of an adequate islet mass.

Small bowel transplantation

The development of small bowel transplantation has long been hindered by the immunological and infectious barriers peculiar to the small bowel. Gradual progress has been achieved during the past decade with the use of tacrolimus and the availability of better anti-infection prophylaxis. The current status of small bowel transplantation as a life-saving option for patients failing on total parenteral nutrition and those who have developed irreversible liver failure is undisputed. Small bowel transplantation can be performed as either an intestine-only graft or as part of a composite graft with the liver and, on occasion, other organs. The various techniques of donor and recipient operations are relatively standardized. Despite the progress made, the most common causes of death and graft loss continue to be sepsis, rejection, and lymphomas. Further progress can be achieved by development of more effective immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory strategies. The role of inducing chimerism by adjuvant donor-specific bone marrow transfusions to promote graft tolerance is uncertain. Until the mortality and graft losses are further reduced, the role of small bowel transplantation will be limited to a salvage procedure for failure of total parenteral nutrition rather than a primary treatment of intestinal failure.