Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty (RECORD4): a randomised trial

Efficacy and safety of commonly used thromboprophylaxis agents following hip and knee arthroplasty

Aims

We investigated the efficacy and safety profile of commonly used venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis agents following hip and knee arthroplasty.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and OrthoSearch was performed. Prophylaxis agents investigated were aspirin (< 325 mg and ≥ 325 mg daily), enoxaparin, dalteparin, fondaparinux, unfractionated heparin, warfarin, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran. The primary efficacy outcome of interest was the risk of VTE, whereas the primary safety outcomes of interest were the risk of major bleeding events (MBE) and wound complications (WC). VTE was defined as the confirmed diagnosis of any deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. Network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence was performed. Cluster rank analysis using the surface under cumulative ranking (SUCRA) was applied to compare each intervention group, weighing safety and efficacy outcomes.

Results

Of 86 studies eligible studies, cluster rank analysis showed that aspirin < 325 mg daily (SUCRA-VTE 89.3%; SUCRA-MBE 75.3%; SUCRA-WC 71.1%), enoxaparin (SUCRA-VTE 55.7%; SUCRA-MBE 49.8%; SUCRA-WC 45.2%), and dabigatran (SUCRA-VTE 44.9%; SUCRA-MBE 52.0%; SUCRA-WC 41.9%) have an overall satisfactory efficacy and safety profile.

Conclusion

We recommend the use of either aspirin < 325 mg daily, enoxaparin, or dabigatran for VTE prophylaxis following hip and knee arthroplasty.

Antithrombotic prophylaxis following total knee arthroplasty: a level I Bayesian network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major concern following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal pharmacological prophylaxis remains, however, controversial. The present investigation compared several non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants commonly employed as VTE prophylaxis following TKA. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare apixaban, aspirin, dabigatran, edoxaban, enoxaparin, fondaparinux, and rivaroxaban. The outcomes of interest were to compare the rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and major and minor haemorrhages.

METHODS

This study was conducted according to the PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-Analyses of Health Care Interventions. In March 2024, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were accessed with no time constraints. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more drugs for the prevention of VTE following TKA were considered for inclusion.

RESULTS

Data from 29,678 patients were collected. Of them, 67% (19,884 of 29,678 patients) were women. The mean age of the patients was 66.8 ± 2.8 years, and the mean BMI was 29.2 ± 1.5 kg/m2. There was comparability in age, sex, and BMI at baseline. Apixaban 5 mg, dabigatran 220 mg, and rivaroxaban 10 mg were the most effective in reducing the rate of DVT. Apixaban 5 mg, enoxaparin 60 mg, and rivaroxaban 40 mg were the most effective in reducing the rate of PE. Apixaban 5 mg, rivaroxaban 10 mg, and apixaban 10 mg were associated with the lowest rate of major haemorrhages. Apixaban 5 mg and 20 mg, and dabigatran 220 mg were associated with the lowest rate of minor haemorrhages.

CONCLUSION

Administration of apixaban 5 mg demonstrated the best balance between VTE prevention and haemorrhage control following TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, network meta-analysis of RCTs.

Pharmacotherapy for Venous Thromboprophylaxis following Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

The optimal pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hip or knee arthroplasty is uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of various medications. We searched multiple databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing medications (including factor Xa inhibitors, factor IIa inhibitor, warfarin, unfractionated heparin [UFH], low-molecular-weight heparin [LMWH], aspirin, pentasaccharide) for VTE prophylaxis post-arthroplasty. Outcomes included any postoperative VTE identified with screening, major bleeding, and death. We used LMWH as the main comparator for analysis and performed trial sequential analysis (TSA) for each pairwise comparison. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Developments and Evaluations). We analyzed 70 RCTs (55,841 participants). Factor Xa inhibitors decreased postoperative VTE significantly compared with LMWH (odds ratio [OR]: 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.68, high certainty). Pentasaccharides probably reduce VTE (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.36-1.02, moderate certainty), while the factor IIa inhibitor dabigatran may reduce VTE (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.40-1.42, low certainty). UFH probably increases VTE compared with LMWH (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.91-1.89, moderate certainty), and other agents like warfarin, aspirin, placebo, and usual care without thromboprophylaxis increase VTE (high certainty). Factor Xa inhibitors may not significantly affect major bleeding compared with LMWH (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.81-1.39, low certainty). No medications had a notable effect on mortality compared with LMWH (very low certainty). TSA suggests sufficient evidence for the benefit of factor Xa inhibitors over LMWH for VTE prevention. Compared with LMWH and aspirin, factor Xa inhibitors are associated with reduced VTE after hip or knee arthroplasty, without an increase in bleeding and likely no impact on mortality.

Global trends in research of venous thromboembolism associated with lower limb joint arthroplasty: A bibliometric analysis

This study aims to visualize publications related to venous thromboembolism (VTE) and lower limb joint arthroplasty to identify research frontiers and hotspots, providing references and guidance for further research. We retrieved original articles published from 1985 to 2022 and their recorded information from the Web of Science Core Collection. The search strategy used terms related to knee or hip arthroplasty and thromboembolic events. Microsoft Excel was used to analyze the annual publications and citations of the included literature. The rest of the data were analyzed using the VOSviewer, citespace and R and produced visualizations of these collaborative networks. We retrieved 3543 original articles and the results showed an overall upward trend in annual publications. The United States of America had the most significant number of publications (Np) and collaborative links with other countries. McMaster University had the greatest Np. Papers published by Geerts WH in 2008 had the highest total link strength. Journal of Arthroplasty published the most articles on the research of VTE associated with lower limb joint arthroplasty. The latest research trend mainly involved "general anesthesia" "revision" and "tranexamic acid." This bibliometric study revealed that the research on VTE after lower limb joint arthroplasty is developing rapidly. The United States of America leads in terms of both quantity and quality of publications, while European and Canadian institutions and authors also make significant contributions. Recent research focused on the use of tranexamic acid, anesthesia selection, and the VTE risk in revision surgeries.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the morbidity of efficacy endpoints and bleeding events in elderly and young patients treated with the same dose rivaroxaban

Rivaroxaban is a new direct oral anticoagulant, and the same dose is recommended for older and young patients. However, recent real-world studies show that older patients may need dose adjustment to prevent major bleeding. At present, the evidence for dose adjustment in older patients is extremely limited with only a few reports on older atrial fibrillation patients. The aim of this study was to review the morbidity data of adverse events and bleeding events across all indications for older and young patients treated with the same dose of rivaroxaban to provide some support for dosage adjustment in older patients. The PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials, Cochrane and Web of Science databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 1, 2005, and October 10, 2023. The primary outcomes were the morbidity of bleeding events and efficacy-related adverse events. Summary estimates were calculated using a random effects model. Eighteen RCTs were included in the qualitative analysis. The overall morbidity of primary efficacy endpoints was higher in older patients compared to the young patients (3.37% vs. 2.60%, χ2 = 5.24, p = 0.022). Similarly, a higher morbidity of bleeding was observed in older patients compared to the young patients (4.42% vs. 6.03%, χ2 = 13.22, p < 0.001). Among all indications, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and atrial fibrillation were associated with the highest incidence of bleeding in older patients, suggesting that these patients may be most need dose adjustment. Patients older than 75 years may require extra attention to prevent bleeding. The same dose of rivaroxaban resulted in higher bleeding morbidity and morbidity of efficacy-related adverse events in older patients compared to the young patients. An individualized dose adjustment may be preferred for older patients rather than a fixed dose that fits all.

Therapy adherence, safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with hip or knee endoprosthesis

PURPOSE

Rivaroxaban is a potent, selective direct inhibitor of factor Xa. The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapy adherence, safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban therapy in reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective hip or knee replacement.

METHODS

The prospective, post-marketing clinical trial was conducted on adult patients after knee or hip endoprosthesis. Data were collected at the baseline and three control visits (five days, a month and three months after the baseline). Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) was used for evaluation of therapy adherence.

RESULTS

The study included 60 patients who received rivaroxaban therapy in a dose of 10 mg once a day. A low adherence to the drug was observed in 15% patients. All patients had an average MMAS-8 score in the range of high adherence 0.65 ± 0.90. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism was observed in two patients with numerous risk factors. No major bleeding was recorded during entire follow-up period. During the five-day postoperative in-hospital follow-up, signs of wound complications were recorded in 8 (13.3%) patients, and 4 (6.7%) of them underwent surgical revision of the wound.

CONCLUSION

Generally, there was high adherence to rivaroxaban therapy, but low adherence was present in 15% of patients. Rivaroxaban showed good safety and efficacy. However, high proportion of wound complications and patients needing surgical revision of the wound should be further evaluated through larger studies.

Being precise with anticoagulation to reduce adverse drug reactions: are we there yet?

Anticoagulants are potent therapeutics widely used in medical and surgical settings, and the amount spent on anticoagulation is rising. Although warfarin remains a widely prescribed oral anticoagulant, prescriptions of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have increased rapidly. Heparin-based parenteral anticoagulants include both unfractionated and low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs). In clinical practice, anticoagulants are generally well tolerated, although interindividual variability in response is apparent. This variability in anticoagulant response can lead to serious incident thrombosis, haemorrhage and off-target adverse reactions such as heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia (HIT). This review seeks to highlight the genetic, environmental and clinical factors associated with variability in anticoagulant response, and review the current evidence base for tailoring the drug, dose, and/or monitoring decisions to identified patient subgroups to improve anticoagulant safety. Areas that would benefit from further research are also identified. Validated variants in VKORC1, CYP2C9 and CYP4F2 constitute biomarkers for differential warfarin response and genotype-informed warfarin dosing has been shown to reduce adverse clinical events. Polymorphisms in CES1 appear relevant to dabigatran exposure but the genetic studies focusing on clinical outcomes such as bleeding are sparse. The influence of body weight on LMWH response merits further attention, as does the relationship between anti-Xa levels and clinical outcomes. Ultimately, safe and effective anticoagulation requires both a deeper parsing of factors contributing to variable response, and further prospective studies to determine optimal therapeutic strategies in identified higher risk subgroups.

The safety and efficacy of NOACs versus LMWH for thromboprophylaxis after THA or TKA: A systemic review and meta-analysis

The differences in the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation between different types of new oral anticoagulants(NOACs) and low molecular weight heparin(LMWH) are still controversial. The main purposes of this study were to analyze safety and efficacy of NOACs versus LMWH for thromboprophylaxis, and perform subgroup analyses stratified by individual NOACs and different populations after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang databases until June 31, 2022. This systematic review and meta-analysis included 46 randomized controlled trials (RCT) with 39, 924 patients. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis between LMWH and NOACs. NOACs were more effective in reducing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (RR0.59; 95%CI 0.49-0.71) and adverse events (RR: 0.96; 95%CI: 0.93-0.99) than LMWH. The subgroup analyses for different anticoagulants revealed that rivaroxaban (RR:0.49; 95%CI:0.36-0.66), apixaban (RR: 0.54; 95%CI: 0.36-0.81) and edoxaban (RR:0.49; 95%CI: 0.32-0.75) have the lower risk of DVT than LMWH. Apixaban (RR:0.89; 95%CI: 0.80-1.00) had superior prevention of bleeding to LMWH. Edoxaban exhibited a lower risk of VTE (RR: 0.46; 95%CI: 0.33-0.65), advantage events (RR: 0.87; 95%CI: 0.82-0.93), and drug-related adverse events (DRAEs) (RR: 0.64; 95%CI: 0.53-0.76) than LMWH. East Asian population was superior to western population for preventing DVT, advantage events, and DRAE using NOACs. In conclusion, NOACs are more effective than LMWH at preventing DVT and adverse events after arthroplasty. Apixaban has lower bleeding than LMWH, and East Asian populations may benefit more than western population from NOACs.

When Direct Oral Anticoagulants Should Not Be Standard Treatment: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

For most patients, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred over vitamin K antagonists for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for venous thromboembolism treatment. However, randomized controlled trials suggest that DOACs may not be as efficacious or as safe as the current standard of care in conditions such as mechanical heart valves, thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, and atrial fibrillation associated with rheumatic heart disease. DOACs do not provide a net benefit in conditions such as embolic stroke of undetermined source. Their efficacy is uncertain for conditions such as left ventricular thrombus, catheter-associated deep vein thrombosis, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, and for patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thrombosis who have end-stage renal disease. This paper provides an evidence-based review of randomized controlled trials on DOACs, detailing when they have demonstrated efficacy and safety, when DOACs should not be the standard of care, where their safety and efficacy are uncertain, and areas requiring further research.

Update on the Pharmacological Actions of Enoxaparin in Nonsurgical Patients

Low-molecular-weight heparins are a class of drugs derived from the enzymatic depolymerization of unfractionated heparin that includes enoxaparin. Several studies have been performed on enoxaparin in recent years, in particular for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. Furthermore, the use of enoxaparin has been extended to other clinical situations that require antithrombotic pharmacological prevention, such as hemodialysis and recurrent abortion. In this review, we report the main clinical experiences of using enoxaparin in the prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients.

Follow-up study of isolated calf muscular vein thrombosis for anticoagulant therapy after primary hip and knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although isolated calf muscular vein thrombosis (ICMVT) is commonly seen after hip and knee arthroplasty, no treatment guidelines for ICMVT after joint replacement are available. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with ICMVT for anticoagulant therapy at different time points after primary hip and knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Patients with ICMVT after primary hip and knee arthroplasty were included in the study. Diagnosis was established with Doppler ultrasound. Patients were followed up clinically and with Doppler ultrasound at 1, 2, and 3 months. The outcomes were efficacy (complete resolution) and acceptability (hemorrhagic events). Anticoagulant therapy at curative dosage was prescribed for 1 month and was extended for 2 additional months in case of incomplete resolution at 1 month or if propagation was present. The chi-square test was used to compare the outcomes at different time points.

RESULTS

302 patients were taken hip and knee arthroplasty from January 2021 to May 2022, in which 51 patients presented with 51 ICMVTs postoperatively. The incidence of ICMVT was about 16.89%. Resolution of ICMVT was considered complete at 1, 2, and 3 months at 36.73%, 61.22%, and 91.84%, respectively, with significant differences among the time points (P < 0.05). All patients with ICMVT receiving anticoagulant therapy remained free of propagations and hemorrhagic events within 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide new insights into the anticoagulant therapy for ICMVT after primary hip and knee arthroplasty, taking oral Rivaroxaban for 3 months is effective and safe, which contributes to provide the reference for clinical practice.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Measures for the Treatment of Adults with Isolated Calf Muscular Vein Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Isolated calf muscular vein thrombosis (ICMVT) can result in pulmonary embolism, but the treatment of ICMVT remains controversial. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the optimal treatment for the ICMVT by comparing the efficacy and safety of different treatments.

METHODS

A network meta-analysis was conducted to search for studies published from database inception to April 30, 2022, that compared the outcomes of 2 or more treatments for ICMVT. The primary outcomes were efficacy (resolution rate) and safety (adverse reactions). Data were extracted following predefined hierarchy and the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. We estimated summary odds ratios with 95% credibility intervals using Bayesian network meta-analysis with random effects.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies were enrolled in the study. In terms of efficacy and safety, urokinase thrombolysis combined with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was most effective but had the lowest safety, while physical therapy was safest but had the lowest efficacy. More important, direct oral factor Xa inhibitors were most likely to be second most effective and safe compared with other treatments. For the duration of treatment, anticoagulant therapy for at least 3 months could effectively increase the resolution rate of ICMVT.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering both efficacy and safety, taking direct oral factor Xa inhibitors for at least 3 months was the optimal treatment compared to LMWH, urokinase thrombolysis combined LMWH, physical therapy and warfarin for patients with ICMVT.

An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Graduated Compression Stockings in Addition to Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical Inpatients

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in surgical inpatients with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and additional graduated compression stockings (GCSs) versus pharmacological thromboprophylaxis alone.

BACKGROUND

Surgical inpatients have elevated VTE risk; recent studies cast doubt on whether GCS confers additional protection against VTE, compared with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis alone.

METHODS

The review followed "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses" guidelines using a registered protocol (CRD42017062655). The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched up to November 2022. Randomized trials reporting VTE rate after surgical procedures, utilizing pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, with or without GCS, were included. The rates of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, and VTE-related mortality were pooled through fixed and random effects.

RESULTS

In a head-to-head meta-analysis, the risk of DVT for GCS and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.54-1.36) versus for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis alone (2 studies, 70 events, 2653 participants). The risk of DVT in pooled trial arms for GCS and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.23-1.25) versus pharmacological thromboprophylaxis alone (33 trial arms, 1228 events, 14,108 participants). The risk of pulmonary embolism for GCS and pharmacological prophylaxis versus pharmacological prophylaxis alone was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.0-30.0) (27 trial arms, 32 events, 11,472 participants). There were no between-group differences in VTE-related mortality (27 trial arms, 3 events, 12,982 participants).

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from head-to-head meta-analysis and pooled trial arms demonstrates no additional benefit for GCS in preventing VTE and VTE-related mortality. GCS confer a risk of skin complications and an economic burden; current evidence does not support their use for surgical inpatients.

[Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolic complications in orthopedic patients]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the comprehensive program for prevention of thromboembolic complications in orthopedic patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We have analyzed thromboembolic complications in orthopedic patients after surgeries on large joints over the past 5 years (2018-2022).

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive approach to prevention and treatment of thromboembolic complications including ultrasound, early surgical prevention of pulmonary embolism can significantly improve postoperative outcomes after joint replacement surgery. Vacuum aspiration retrograde thrombectomy is effective, feasible and safe for acute ilio-femoral venous thrombosis reducing hospital-stay (p=0.0124) and restoring vein patency. Widespread thromboembolic complications, especially for pulmonary embolism in 2022, are likely due to a new coronavirus infection and require careful screening of patients with risk factors with appropriate preventive antithrombotic therapy.

Anticoagulant therapy in orthopedic surgery - a review on anticoagulant agents, risk factors, monitoring, and current challenges

Orthopedic surgeries are associated with high-risk of thromboembolism which occurs in 40% to 60% of orthopedic patients in the absence of thromboprophylaxis. Conventionally heparin anticoagulants were used for thromboprophylaxis and currently direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used due to their minimal complexity. Anticoagulant use carries bleeding risk and requires optimal laboratory monitoring through conventional thrombin-based assays, anti-Xa assay, anti-IIa assay and contemporary ecarin chromogenic assay (ECA) and rotational thromboelastometry. Monitoring requires multiple hospital visits and hence, the development of point-of-care assays is gaining momentum. Also, a thorough risk assessment model (RAM) is necessary for successful anticoagulant therapy since it enables personalized approach for better thromboprophylaxis outcomes. Despite welcoming changes, lack of guideline consensus, population-based thromboprophylaxis, deficiencies in risk stratification and non-adherence are still a concern. Stronger clinical and process support system with uniform guidelines approaches and patient-specific RAM can aid in the successful implementation of anticoagulant therapy.

Current Evidence and Expert Opinion on Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee and Hip Replacement

An effective anticoagulant provides a balance between the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding and is crucial in achieving optimal clinical outcomes in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) surgeries. We performed a review of the literature on thromboprophylaxis for patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement. This review article summarizes current guidelines and evidence for anticoagulation along with the expert opinion about pharmacological VTE prophylaxis, particularly non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), for patients after total hip or knee replacement. Aspirin for VTE prophylaxis after TKR/THR has been controversial and most of the evidence is reported from observational research. Although the guidelines do not recommend any specific thromboprophylaxis agent, available evidence suggests that NOACs are as effective as low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) in preventing VTE. Oral administration and the lack of dose monitoring make NOACs easy to use in outpatient settings in cases with challenging treatment compliances. They can be used for two weeks after TKR and five weeks after THR - six weeks after TKR and THR to cover the at-risk period for VTE post-discharge. Owing to the lack of evidence for a head-to-head comparison of NOACs, an anticoagulant with better efficacy and safety may be suggested in special patient populations (elderly, obese patients, or those with renal dysfunction). The expert opinion on pharmacological VTE prophylaxis provided in this article could address some gaps in the management of anticoagulation in patients with total hip or knee replacement.

Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in orthopedic surgery: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism is highly associated with orthopedic surgery, so thromboprophylaxis is an important consideration for orthopedic surgeons. The new oral anticoagulants have clear advantages for clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in different orthopedic surgeries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Systematic electronic search of clinical trials was carried out. Data extraction of efficacy outcomes (deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and death) and safety outcomes (major bleeding and clinical relevant bleeding) was realized.

RESULTS

Six randomized and controlled clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with enoxaparin the risk of venous thromboembolism was lower with rivaroxaban both in different orthopedic surgeries (RR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.36-0.73; P=.0002). This result was even better and more homogeneous in the analysis of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis outcome (RR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.28-0.65; P<.0001; I2=0%; P=.49). The risk of bleeding was not significantly higher with rivaroxaban (RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.97-1.49; P=.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Rivaroxaban should be considerate such as a more effective alternative for thromboprophylaxis in orthopedic surgery.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Major Orthopedic Surgeries and Factor XIa Inhibitors

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), poses a significant risk during and after hospitalization, particularly for surgical patients. Among various patient groups, those undergoing major orthopedic surgeries are considered to have a higher susceptibility to PE and DVT. Major lower-extremity orthopedic procedures carry a higher risk of symptomatic VTE compared to most other surgeries, with an estimated incidence of ~4%. The greatest risk period occurs within the first 7-14 days following surgery. Major bleeding is also more prevalent in these surgeries compared to others, with rates estimated between 2% and 4%. For patients undergoing major lower-extremity orthopedic surgery who have a low bleeding risk, it is recommended to use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with or without mechanical devices. The choice of the initial agent depends on the specific surgery and patient comorbidities. First-line options include low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), direct oral anticoagulants, and aspirin. Second-line options consist of unfractionated heparin (UFH), fondaparinux, and warfarin. For most patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty, the initial agents recommended for the early perioperative period are LMWHs (enoxaparin or dalteparin) or direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban or apixaban). In the case of hip fracture surgery, LMWH is recommended as the preferred agent for the entire duration of prophylaxis. However, emerging factor XI(a) inhibitors, as revealed by a recent meta-analysis, have shown a substantial decrease in the occurrence of VTE and bleeding events among patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. This discovery poses a challenge to the existing paradigm of anticoagulant therapy in this specific patient population and indicates that factor XI(a) inhibitors hold great promise as a potential strategy to be taken into serious consideration.

Rivaroxaban versus nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis following thoracic surgery for lung cancer: A randomized, noninferiority trial

The benefit of rivaroxaban in thromboprophylaxis after oncologic lung surgery remains unknown. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, patients who underwent thoracic surgery for lung cancer were enrolled, and randomly assigned to rivaroxaban or nadroparin groups in a 1:1 ratio; anticoagulants were initiated 12-24 h after surgery and continued until discharge. Four hundred participants were required according to a noninferiority margin of 2%, assuming venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurrence rates of 6.0% and 12.6% for patients in the rivaroxaban and nadroparin groups, respectively. The primary efficacy outcome was any VTE during the treatment and 30-day follow-up periods. The safety outcome was any on-treatment bleeding event. Finally, 403 patients were randomized (intention-to-treat [ITT] population), with 381 included in per-protocol (PP) population. The primary efficacy outcomes occurred in 12.5% (25/200) of the rivaroxaban group and 17.7% (36/203) of the nadroparin group (absolute risk reduction, -5.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], [-12.2-1.7]), indicating the noninferiority of rivaroxaban in ITT population. Sensitivity analysis was performed in the PP population and yielded similar results, confirming the noninferiority of rivaroxaban. In the safety analysis population, the incidence of any on-treatment bleeding events did not differ significantly between the groups (12.2% for rivaroxaban vs. 7.0% for nadroparin; relative risk [RR], 1.9; 95% CI, [0.9-3.7]; p = .08), including major bleeding (9.7% vs. 6.5%; RR, 1.6 [95% CI, 0.9-3.7]; p = .24), and nonmajor bleeding (2.6% vs. 0.5%; RR, 5.2 [95% CI, 0.6-45.2]; p = .13). Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis after oncologic lung surgery was shown to be noninferior to nadroparin.

Clinical Studies with Anticoagulants that Have Changed Clinical Practice

Anticoagulant therapy is the cornerstone of treatment and prevention of arterial and venous thromboembolism. Taking a historical perspective, starting in the 1960s, and progressing through to 2022, we discuss key clinical trials of anticoagulants that have changed clinical practice, and examine obstacles encountered in bringing these anticoagulants to the clinic. The design of some of the early studies that shaped clinical practice was poor by current standards, but their results were influential because nothing better was available. Both heparin and vitamin K antagonists had been in clinical use for several decades before well-designed trials in the 1980s optimized their dosing and enhanced their safety and efficacy. Low-molecular-weight heparin then replaced unfractionated heparin because it had a more predictable dose-response and a longer half-life, thereby allowing it to be used conveniently in out-of-hospital settings. More recently, direct oral anticoagulants became the oral anticoagulants of choice for most indications because they were shown to be at least as safe and effective as vitamin K antagonists when used in fixed doses without the need for laboratory monitoring. The design of the trials that led to the approval of the direct oral anticoagulants was excellent, but further studies are required to optimize their dosing in selected patients who were underrepresented in these trials.

Trends in Venous Thromboembolism After Shoulder Arthroplasty in the United States: Analysis Following the 2009 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practical Guidelines

BACKGROUND

In 2009, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons released a consensus recommending venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The purpose of this study was to examine the (1) change in incidence of 90-day VTE, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism; (2) change in utilization of chemoprophylaxis; and (3) change in the economic burden associated with VTE after TSA from 2010 to 2019.

METHODS

Using the PearlDiver database, national data from 2010 to 2019 were used to identify patients who underwent primary TSA for osteoarthritis and/or rotator cuff arthropathy. Exclusions entailed liver pathology, coagulopathy, or those on prior prescribed blood thinners before TSA. Multivariable regression was used controlling for age and Charlson Comorbidity Index for all years with 2010 as the reference year.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2019, there was a reduction in VTE rates from 0.89% in 2010 to 0.78% in 2019. Regarding implant type, there was no notable change in incidence of VTE, DVT, and pulmonary embolism within 90 days after anatomic TSA. Notable reductions were observed in both VTE and DVT after reverse TSA from 2010 to 2019. Prescribed chemical VTE prophylaxis utilization after TSA markedly increased from 4.41% in 2010 to 11.70% utilization in 2019. The utilization of aspirin markedly increased from 17.27% in 2010 to 65.17% in 2019. Among anticoagulants, the utilization of direct factor Xa inhibitors increased from 0.0% utilization in 2010 to 66.09% utilization in 2019. The added reimbursements associated with VTE after TSA markedly decreased from $14,122 in 2010 to $4,348 in 2019.

CONCLUSION

The incidence and economic burden associated with VTE after TSA have markedly declined following the 2010 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guidelines. This reduction can be attributed to both an increase in VTE prevention through increased utilization of prescribed chemoprophylaxis and improvement in VTE treatment strategies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Joint 2022 European Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a potentially fatal but preventable postoperative complication. Thoracic oncology patients undergoing surgical resection, often after multimodality induction therapy, represent among the highest risk groups for postoperative VTE. Currently there are no VTE prophylaxis guidelines specific to these thoracic surgery patients. Evidenced-based recommendations will help clinicians manage and mitigate risk of VTE in the postoperative period and inform best practice.

OBJECTIVE

These joint evidence-based guidelines from The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons aim to inform clinicians and patients in decisions about prophylaxis to prevent VTE in patients undergoing surgical resection for lung or esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included broad membership to minimize potential bias when formulating recommendations. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 24 recommendations focused on pharmacological and mechanical methods for prophylaxis in patients undergoing lobectomy and segmentectomy, pneumonectomy, and esophagectomy, as well as extended resections for lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The certainty of the supporting evidence for the majority of recommendations was judged as low or very low, largely due to a lack of direct evidence for thoracic surgery. The panel made conditional recommendations for use of parenteral anticoagulation for VTE prevention, in combination with mechanical methods, over no prophylaxis for cancer patients undergoing anatomic lung resection or esophagectomy. Other key recommendations include: conditional recommendations for using parenteral anticoagulants over direct oral anticoagulants, with use of direct oral anticoagulants suggested only in the context of clinical trials; conditional recommendation for using extended prophylaxis for 28 to 35 days over in-hospital prophylaxis only for patients at moderate or high risk of thrombosis; and conditional recommendations for VTE screening in patients undergoing pneumonectomy and esophagectomy. Future research priorities include the role of preoperative thromboprophylaxis and the role of risk stratification to guide use of extended prophylaxis.

Safety and Efficacy of Rivaroxaban in Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

An optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis agent should balance efficacy and safety. While rivaroxaban provides effective venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty, it may be associated with higher rates of bleeding. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban to aspirin and enoxaparin.

METHODS

A large national database was queried for patients who underwent elective primary total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from January 2015 through December 2020 who received rivaroxaban, aspirin, or enoxaparin. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the 90-day risk of bleeding and thromboembolic complications. Among TKA patients identified, 86,721 (10.8%) received rivaroxaban, 408,038 (50.8%) received aspirin, and 108,377 (13.5%) received enoxaparin. Among THA patients, 42,469 (9.5%) received rivaroxaban, 242,876 (54.5%) received aspirin, and 59,727 (13.4%) received enoxaparin.

RESULTS

After accounting for confounding factors, rivaroxaban was associated with increased risk of transfusion (TKA: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.58, P < .001; THA: aOR 1.64, P < .001), pulmonary embolism (TKA: aOR = 1.25, P = .007), and deep vein thrombosis (TKA: aOR = 1.13, P = .022) compared to aspirin. Compared to enoxaparin, rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of combined bleeding events (TKA: aOR = 1.07, P < .001, THA: aOR = 1.11, P < .001), but decreased risk of combined prothrombotic events (THA: aOR = 0.85, P = .036).

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban chemoprophylaxis following TKA and THA was associated with an increased risk of bleeding and prothrombotic complications compared to aspirin and enoxaparin.

Efficacy of 11 anticoagulants for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To systematically review the efficacy of 11 anticoagulants in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total hip or knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, VIP, and China Biology Medicine databases were electronically searched for studies assessing the efficacy of different anticoagulants for the prevention of VTE after total hip or knee arthroplasty from January 1, 2010, to January 27, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and graded the evidence using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis. The network meta-analysis was then performed using Stata 16.0 software and R 4.1.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 61 articles were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that apixaban, edoxaban, fondaparinux, rivaroxaban, and darexaban were the most effective anticoagulants for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty (P < .05), while there was no difference in the efficacy among the anticoagulants for the prevention of pulmonary embolism (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Apixaban, edoxaban, fondaparinux, rivaroxaban, and darexaban have the best efficacy for the prevention of VTE after total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Detection of LAP1 and LAP2 genes from Trichophyton rubrum

Samples of hair, nails and skin were collected, representing people of different ages and races. The number of isolated people gathered between October 2021 and February 2022 from Al-Hussein Teaching Hospital and a private clinic under the supervision of doctors(118) species was examined. Dermatophytes were found in 80 of them; among the 80 positive Trichophyton rubrum species, 30 were produced, which represents less than half of the dermatophytes for each of the 80 positive species (14 cutaneous, nine hair and seven nail isolates)the study's findings included hair hole testing, which came back negative, and urea degradation testing. The results were either negative or inconsistent across the isolates; the growth test in the PDA was positive, the virulence factors that enable the fungus to penetrate host tissues were studied during leucine aminopeptidase (LAP1) and (LAP2), it was observed that there were no significant differences in gene isolates of T. rubrum. Keywords: LAP1; LAP2; genus Trichophyton rubrum.

Joint 2022 European Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a potentially fatal but preventable postoperative complication. Thoracic oncology patients undergoing surgical resection, often after multimodality induction therapy, represent among the highest risk groups for postoperative VTE. Currently there are no VTE prophylaxis guidelines specific to these thoracic surgery patients. Evidenced-based recommendations will help clinicians manage and mitigate risk of VTE in the postoperative period and inform best practice.

OBJECTIVE

These joint evidence-based guidelines from The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons aim to inform clinicians and patients in decisions about prophylaxis to prevent VTE in patients undergoing surgical resection for lung or esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included broad membership to minimize potential bias when formulating recommendations. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 24 recommendations focused on pharmacological and mechanical methods for prophylaxis in patients undergoing lobectomy and segmentectomy, pneumonectomy, and esophagectomy, as well as extended resections for lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The certainty of the supporting evidence for the majority of recommendations was judged as low or very low, largely due to a lack of direct evidence for thoracic surgery. The panel made conditional recommendations for use of parenteral anticoagulation for VTE prevention, in combination with mechanical methods, over no prophylaxis for cancer patients undergoing anatomic lung resection or esophagectomy. Other key recommendations include: conditional recommendations for using parenteral anticoagulants over direct oral anticoagulants, with use of direct oral anticoagulants suggested only in the context of clinical trials; conditional recommendation for using extended prophylaxis for 28 to 35 days over in-hospital prophylaxis only for patients at moderate or high risk of thrombosis; and conditional recommendations for VTE screening in patients undergoing pneumonectomy and esophagectomy. Future research priorities include the role of preoperative thromboprophylaxis and the role of risk stratification to guide use of extended prophylaxis. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022;▪:1-31).

Risk of nonmajor bleeding upon use of direct oral anticoagulants for preventing and treating venous thromboembolism: A network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with bleeding. Patients often stop taking DOACs due to nonmajor bleeding, which may lead to venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence. We aimed to determine the risk of nonmajor bleeding using different DOACs to prevent and treat VTE.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception until January 6, 2021. The incidence of clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding and minor bleeding was investigated. In frequentist-based network meta-analysis, we analyzed the odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI and the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA).

RESULTS

Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (involving 64,493 patients) were included. For preventing VTE, the risk for clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was lowest for apixaban, followed by that for low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. The risk for minor bleeding was lowest for apixaban, followed by that for rivaroxaban, LMWH, dabigatran, and edoxaban. For treating VTE, the risk for clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was also lowest for apixaban, followed by that for edoxaban, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), and rivaroxaban. The risk for minor bleeding was lowest for apixaban, followed by that for rivaroxaban and VKAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of whether it was used for preventing or treating VTE, apixaban had the lowest risk of nonmajor bleeding. This suggests that apixaban may have a lower risk of nonmajor bleeding than other anticoagulants and may help provide some clinical reference for choosing a more appropriate drug for the patient.

Efficacy and safety of pre-operative insertion of inferior vena cava filter in patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review

Prophylactic placement of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters prior to performing bariatric surgery is an intervention of unclear safety and efficacy with disagreement between current practice guidelines. To better characterize the risk and benefit of IVC filter insertion prior to bariatric surgery based on the current evidence. A systematic review of the literature of patients with prophylactic IVC filter insertion prior to bariatric surgery was performed and 32 studies were identified for inclusion into the review, of which none were randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis was performed including the high-quality included studies. Seven high quality studies reported thrombotic events in patients undergoing bariatric surgery who had an IVCF and a control group which allowed for meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio of venous thrombotic events in the IVC filter population versus the group without IVC filters was 1.57 (95%CI 0.89, 2.76). Among high quality studies 5 reported major bleeding with a rate of 0.76% and 6 reported on IVC filter complications with a rate of 0.67%. Overall no significant reduction in the rate of venous thrombosis was found with prophylactic IVC filter insertion. Use of IVC filters for prophylaxis remains a concern given the lack of clear efficacy in this setting and a small but present complication risk.

Thromboembolic events in COVID-19 ambulatory patients: An observational study about incidence, and thromboprophylaxis outcomes

Introduction

There are no clear data about the incidence and the prophylactic strategies of arterial and venous thromboembolic events (TE) in COVID-19 ambulatory patients. Thus, we conducted this study to analyze thromboembolic complications in this setting and to assess thromboprophylaxis management and outcomes in the real life.

Patients and methods

This is an observational study including Covid-19 ambulatory patients. We assessed incidence of venous and arterial TE events as well as thromboprophylaxis outcomes and hemorrhagic complications. We defined high risk thrombo-embolic factor according to the Belgian guidelines which are the only guidelines that described thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 ambulatory patients.

Results

We included 2089 patients with a mean age of 43±16 years. The incidence of 30 days venous and arterial TE complications in our cohort was 1%. Venous thromboembolic complications occurred in 0.8% and arterial thromboembolic complications occurred in 0.3%.We noted at least one high-risk TE factor in 18.5% of patients but thromboprophylaxis was prescribed in 22.5% of the cases, LMWH in 18.1%, and Rivaroxaban in 3.7%. Hemorrhagic events occurred in eight patients (0.3%): five patients showed minor hemorrhagic events and three patients showed major ones (0.14%).

Conclusions

Our study showed that the incidence of thromboembolic complications is very low in COVID-19 ambulatory patients. Paradoxically, there is an over prescription of thrombo-prophylaxis in this population.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban and Enoxaparin as Thromboprophylaxis Agents for Orthopedic Surgery—Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication that can occur during and after postoperative treatment, including in treatment after orthopedic surgery. The current guidelines for VTE prophylaxis in postoperative patients recommend the use of LMWHs, one of which is enoxaparin. Another recommendation for use in pharmacological VTE prophylaxis is rivaroxaban, which has better efficacy than enoxaparin but a higher bleeding risk. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an update on the profile of rivaroxaban for VTE prophylaxis after orthopedic surgery. PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and EBSCOhost were searched up until May 2022. The outcome sought was efficacy and safety, described by the incidence of VTE and incidence of bleeding, respectively. Five randomized controlled trials (RCT) were finally included. Rivaroxaban was confirmed to have better efficacy by significantly reducing the risk of VTE and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.27–0.54) compared to enoxaparin. However, regarding the safety variable, no significant difference was found between the incidence of major bleeding in rivaroxaban and enoxaparin (RR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.56–1.68). The results of the analysis show that rivaroxaban has better efficacy than enoxaparin but the same safety profile, so when used, the bleeding of patients should still be monitored.

Efficacy and Safety Considerations With Dose-Reduced Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Review

Importance

Dose-reduced regimens of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be used for 2 main purposes: dose-adjusted treatment intended as full-intensity anticoagulation (eg, for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation [AF] in patients requiring dose reduction) or low-intensity treatment (eg, extended-duration treatment of venous thromboembolism [VTE]). We reviewed randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to understand the scenarios in which dose-adjusted or low-intensity DOACs were tested and reviewed the labeled indications by regulatory authorities, using data from large registries to assess whether the use of dose-reduced DOACs in routine practice aligned with the findings of RCTs.

Observations

Among 4191 screened publications, 35 RCTs that used dose-adjusted DOACs were identified for dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban. Of these 35 RCTs, 29 were related to stroke prevention in AF. Efficacy and safety results for dose-adjusted DOACs in large RCTs of AF were similar to those found for full-dose DOACs. To our knowledge, dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban have not been studied as dose-adjusted therapy for acute VTE treatment. Low-intensity DOACs were identified in 37 RCTs. Low-intensity DOACs may be used for extended-duration treatment of VTE (apixaban and rivaroxaban), primary prevention in orthopedic surgeries (dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban), primary prevention in ambulatory high-risk cancer patients (apixaban and rivaroxaban) or (postdischarge) high-risk medical patients (rivaroxaban), in stable atherosclerotic vascular disease, or after a recent revascularization for peripheral artery disease in conjunction with aspirin (rivaroxaban). Minor variations exist between regulatory authorities in different regions regarding criteria for dose adjustment of DOACs. Data from large registries indicated that dose-reduced DOACs were used occasionally with doses or for clinical scenarios different from those studied in RCTs or recommended by regulatory authorities.

Conclusions and Relevance

Dose adjustment and low-intensity treatment are 2 different forms of dose-reduced DOACs. Dose adjustment is mostly relevant for AF and should be done based on the approved criteria. Dose adjustment of DOACs should not be used for acute VTE treatment in most cases. In contrast, low-intensity DOACs may be used for primary or secondary VTE prevention for studied and approved indications. Attention should be given to routine practice patterns to align the daily clinical practice with existing evidence of safety and efficacy.

Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Post-operative Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the leading causes of post-operative morbidity and mortality. Over previous decades, heparin and warfarin were the predominant therapeutic options for post-operative thromboprophylaxis. However, their use is limited by drawbacks including a narrow therapeutic range, numerous food and drug interactions, and the need for regular monitoring for dose adjustments. Recently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as dabigatran etexilate (a direct thrombin inhibitor) and apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban (direct factor Xa inhibitors), have been developed to overcome these issues. DOACs have shown promising results in Phase III clinical trials for post-operative VTE prophylaxis. This review summarises the pharmacological profile of DOACs and highlights the use of DOACs in post-operative VTE prophylaxis based on the available clinical trial data.

Effect of Early Electroacupuncture Combined with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) on Pain Perception and Dysfunction in Patients after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

Objective

A retrospective case-control study was performed to observe the effect and clinical significance of early electroacupuncture combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on pain perception and dysfunction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

About 100 patients who diagnosed with TKA from February 2019 to April 2021 were enrolled in our hospital. The patients were arbitrarily assigned into control group and study group. The former group was cured with electroacupuncture in the early stage, and the latter group was intervened on the basis of early electroacupuncture combined with the concept of ERAS. The curative effect, the time of getting out of bed for the first time after operation, the time of postoperative rehabilitation, postoperative rehabilitation cost, pain score and knee joint function score, range of motion (ROM) of knee joint, low shear of whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity, fibrinogen level, and postoperative complications were compared.

Results

There exhibited no statistical difference in clinical data. In terms of the treatment effects, there were 27 cases of markedly effective, 22 cases of effective, and 1 case of ineffective in the study group, and the total effective rate was 98.00%; in the control group, 15 cases were markedly effective, 28 cases were effective, and 13 cases were ineffective, and the total effective rate was 86.00%. Compared to the control group, the total effective rate of the study group was higher (P < 0.05). And the first time to get out of bed and the postoperative rehabilitation time in the study group were lower. Compared to the control group (10113.42 ± 524.83) yuan, the postoperative rehabilitation cost in the study group (12401.71 ± 530.77) yuan was higher. In terms of the scores of VAS and HSS, there exhibited no remarkable difference before treatment (P > 0.05). After treatment, the VAS score lessened and the HSS score augmented the study group VAS score (1.76 ± 0.28); the score in the control group was lower compared to the control group (3.45 ± 0.36), and HSS scoring (83.48 ± 11.23) points higher compared to the control group (65.82 ± 10.44) points (P < 0.05). The ROM of knee joint augmented successively at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 8th week after treatment comparison between groups, the ROM of the knee joint in the study group at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 8th week was (49.47 ± 3.60)°, (64.38 ± 5.32)°, (86.93 ± 6.72)°, and (104.20 ± 9.11)°, is higher compared to the control group (46.53 ± 3.41)°, (61.52 ± 5.20)°, (78.42 ± 6.45)°, and (98.77 ± 8.67)° (P < 0.05). One day after operation, there exhibited no remarkable difference in whole blood viscosity low shear, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen level (P > 0.05). However, there exhibited no remarkable difference in plasma viscosity and fibrinogen level at 1 day and 7 days after operation (P > 0.05). Seven days after operation, the whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen in the study group were lower (P < 0.05). The probability of postoperative complications was compared. In the study group, there were 2 cases of limb swelling and pain, 1 case of joint stiffness, and no swelling and pain complicated with deep venous thrombosis, and the total incidence was 6.00%. In the control group, there were 5 cases of limb swelling and pain, 3 cases of joint stiffness, and 3 cases of swelling and pain complicated with deep venous thrombosis, with a total incidence of 22.00%. The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower (χ 2 = 5.317 P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Early electroacupuncture combined with ERAS is of positive significance to the patients after TKA, which can reduce the pain, enhance the function of the knee joint, and promote the ROM of the knee joint, and can effectively shorten the first time out of bed and postoperative rehabilitation time and reduce whole blood viscosity low shear, plasma viscosity, and fibrinogen level, but the overall rehabilitation cost is high, and clinical application should be combined with the actual situation of patients.

Global Research Status and Trends in Venous Thromboembolism After Hip or Knee Arthroplasty From 1990 to 2021: A Bibliometric Analysis

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hip or knee arthroplasty has attracted increasing attention over the past few decades. However, there is no bibliometric report on the publications in this field. The purpose of this study was to analyze the global research status, hotspots, and trends in VTE after arthroplasty.

Methods

All articles about VTE research after hip or knee arthroplasty from 1990 to 2021 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. The information of each article including citation, title, author, journal, country, institution, keywords, and level of evidence was extracted for bibliometric analysis.

Results

A total of 1,245 original articles from 53 countries and 603 institutions were retrieved. The USA contributed most with 457 articles, followed by England and Canada. McMaster University in Canada was the leading institution for publications. The journals with the highest output and citation were the Journal of Arthroplasty and the Thrombosis and Haemostasis, respectively. The median number of citations was significantly different among the levels of evidence (F = 128.957, P < 0.001). The research hotspots switched from VTE diagnosis and heparin to factor Xa inhibitors (fondaparinux, rivaroxaban, apixaban) and direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran etexilate, ximelagatran), and finally to aspirin, risk factor studies, which can be observed from the keyword analysis and co-cited reference cluster analysis.

Conclusions

This study observed an increasing trend of research articles on VTE after arthroplasty. Publications with higher levels of evidence gained further popularity among researchers and orthopedic surgeons. Additionally, individualized VTE prevention and the development of new, safe, effective, and inexpensive oral agents would be emerging trends in the future.

Randomised comparative effectiveness trial of Pulmonary Embolism Prevention after hiP and kneE Replacement (PEPPER): the PEPPER trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

More than 1 million elective total hip and knee replacements are performed annually in the USA with 2% risk of clinical pulmonary embolism (PE), 0.1%-0.5% fatal PE, and over 1000 deaths. Antithrombotic prophylaxis is standard of care but evidence is limited and conflicting. We will compare effectiveness of three commonly used chemoprophylaxis agents to prevent all-cause mortality (ACM) and clinical venous thromboembolism (VTE) while avoiding bleeding complications.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Pulmonary Embolism Prevention after HiP and KneE Replacement is a large randomised pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial with non-inferiority design and target enrolment of 20 000 patients comparing aspirin (81 mg two times a day), low-intensity warfarin (INR (International Normalized Ratio) target 1.7-2.2) and rivaroxaban (10 mg/day). The primary effectiveness outcome is aggregate of VTE and ACM, primary safety outcome is clinical bleeding complications, and patient-reported outcomes are determined at 1, 3 and 6 months. Primary data analysis is per protocol, as preferred for non-inferiority trials, with secondary analyses adherent to intention-to-treat principles. All non-fatal outcomes are captured from patient and clinical reports with independent blinded adjudication. Study design and oversight are by a multidisciplinary stakeholder team including a 10-patient advisory board.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Institutional Review Board of the Medical University of South Carolina provides central regulatory oversight. Patients aged 21 or older undergoing primary or revision hip or knee replacement are block randomised by site and procedure; those on chronic anticoagulation are excluded. Recruitment commenced at 30 North American centres in December 2016. Enrolment currently exceeds 13 500 patients, representing 33% of those eligible at participating sites, and is projected to conclude in July 2024; COVID-19 may force an extension. Results will inform antithrombotic choice by patients and other stakeholders for various risk cohorts, and will be disseminated through academic publications, meeting presentations and communications to advocacy groups and patient participants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02810704.

The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban in the prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Thromboprophylaxis following total hip and knee arthroplasty is variable across institutions, but commonly consists of enoxaparin, and more recently rivaroxaban. We aimed to analyze the current evidence on the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis following TKA or THA.

METHODS

This study was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Electronic database searches were performed using three databases from their dates of inception to June 2020. Relevant randomized controlled studies were identified, with data extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

From eight studies, 13,384 patients were included, with 5700 undergoing TKA and 7684 undergoing THA. There were 6629 patients receiving rivaroxaban and 6755 patients receiving enoxaparin. From the total cohort, rivaroxaban was associated with significantly lower rates of major VTE (p = 0.009) and DVT (p < 0.001) when compared to enoxaparin. There was no significant difference in bleeding complications between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin groups (p = 0.14). Subgroup analysis of patients undergoing THA demonstrated that rivaroxaban reduced risk of major VTE (p = 0.002) and DVT (p = 0.01) with no significant differences in any other complications. For those undergoing TKA, rivaroxaban significantly reduced the risk of DVT (p < 0.001) but was associated with higher rates of post-operative blood transfusion (p = 0.03). Cost-analysis revealed that rivaroxaban was superior to enoxaparin, with the medication cost needed to prevent one DVT being $1081 and $432 less with rivaroxaban for THA and TKA respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Rivaroxaban may be a safe and cost-effective alternative to enoxaparin for routine thromboprophylaxis following total knee or hip arthroplasty.

New Oral Anticoagulants for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background: There is controversy over whether use of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) associates with increased hemorrhage risk compared with non-NOAC. Meanwhile, determining which NOAC to use remains unclear. We aimed to summarize the evidence about NOACs in venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention for patients with total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA).

Methods: We searched RCTs assessing NOACs for VTE prophylaxis in adults undergoing THA and TKA in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane up to May 2021. Primary outcomes were VTE [included deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE)], major VTE, and major bleeding. The rank probabilities of each treatment were summarized by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve area (SUCRA).

Results: 25 RCTs with 42,994 patients were included. Compared with non-NOAC, NOACs were associated with a decreased risk of VTE (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.55–0.84) and major VTE (RR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.35–0.76). Additionally, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban but not dabigatran and betrixaban, did confer a higher efficacy compared with non-NOAC. None of the individual NOACs increased the risk of bleeding, while apixaban and betrixaban were even associated with a decreased risk of bleeding. In the comparison of different NOACs, rivaroxaban was associated with the greatest benefits in VTE (SUCRA = 79.6), DVT (SUCRA = 88.8), and major VTE (SUCRA = 89.9) prevention. Furthermore, subgroup analysis confirmed that NOACs associated with a higher efficacy tendency in patients with follow-up duration <60 days than follow-up duration ≥60 days.

Conclusion: Evidence suggests that NOACs exert more benefits on VTE prophylaxis, and none of the individual NOACs increased hemorrhage compared with non-NOAC. Among various NOACs, rivaroxaban is recommended in patients with lower bleeding risk, and apixaban is recommended in patients with higher bleeding risk.

Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021266890].

Rationale and Design of the H-REPLACE Study: Safety and Efficacy of LMWH Versus Rivaroxaban in ChinEse Patients HospitaLized with Acute Coronary SyndromE

BACKGROUND

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a serious and life-threatening condition. Anticoagulation during the acute phase of ACS is effective in reducing ischemic events. The most widely used parenteral anticoagulation agent in ACS patients is enoxaparin. Rivaroxaban is a novel oral anticoagulant with potent anti-Xa activity, which might be an attractive alternative drug to enoxaparin. In fact, rivaroxaban was consistently shown to be non-inferior to enoxaparin therapy in terms of reduction of recurrent venous thromboembolism events.

OBJECTIVE

This prospective, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter study is designed to compare the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin in patients with ACS, who missed the primary reperfusion therapy window and before selective revascularization.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Up to 2055 participants receiving background treatment of aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor will be randomly assigned to either oral rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily or rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily or subcutaneous enoxaparin 1 mg/kg twice daily until hospital discharge for a maximum of 8 days or 12 h before revascularization therapy. The primary safety endpoint is the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis definition of bleeding events [minor, clinically relevant non-major and major bleeding]. The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, re-revascularization or stroke, and major bleeding events. Secondary endpoints include cardiac-related rehospitalization and all-cause death. Patients will be followed for 12 months after randomization.

CONCLUSIONS

The H-REPLACE trial offers an opportunity to assess clinical outcomes of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin during the acute phase of ACS and may provide an alternative anticoagulation strategy for ACS patients, who missed the primary reperfusion therapy window and before selective revascularization.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03363035.

Severe Bleeding Risks of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the severe bleeding safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched up to 6 January 2021. The incidence of severe bleeding (major, gastrointestinal [GI], intracranial, and fatal) was investigated. Using frequentist network meta-analysis, interventions that were not compared directly could be compared indirectly by the 95% confidence interval (CI), making the search results more intuitive. Based on surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA), the relative ranking probability of each group was generated.

RESULTS

Thirty-one randomised controlled trials (76 641 patients) were included. For the treatment of VTE, the risk of major bleeding with apixaban was significantly lower than dabigatran (odds ratio [OR] 2.10, 95% CI 1.07 - 4.12) and edoxaban (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.36 - 5.15). The safety of the drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: major bleeding: apixaban (SUCRA 98.0), rivaroxaban (SUCRA 69.6), dabigatran (SUCRA 50.7), edoxaban (SUCRA 26.5), and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; SUCRA 5.1); GI bleeding: apixaban (SUCRA 80.7), rivaroxaban (SUCRA 66.8), edoxaban (SUCRA 62.3), VKAs (SUCRA 34.4), and dabigatran (SUCRA 5.8); intracranial bleeding: rivaroxaban (SUCRA 74.4), edoxaban (SUCRA 70.4), dabigatran (SUCRA 58.2), apixaban (SUCRA 44.4), and VKAs (SUCRA 5.6); fatal bleeding: edoxaban (SUCRA 82.7), rivaroxaban (SUCRA 59.2), dabigatran (SUCRA 48.6), apixaban (SUCRA 43.0), and VKAs (SUCRA 16.3). For the prevention of VTE, the risk of major bleeding with apixaban was significantly lower than rivaroxaban (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.02 - 4.52). Among the four types of bleeding, apixaban had the lowest bleeding risk among DOACs (major bleeding: SUCRA 81.6; GI bleeding: SUCRA 75.4; intracranial bleeding: SUCRA 64.1; fatal bleeding: SUCRA 73.6).

CONCLUSIONS

For the treatment of VTE, in terms of major bleeding and GI bleeding, apixaban had the lowest bleeding risk; in terms of intracranial bleeding, rivaroxaban had the lowest bleeding risk; in terms of fatal bleeding, edoxaban had the lowest bleeding risk. For the prevention of VTE, apixaban had the lowest bleeding risk.

Rivaroxaban, a Direct Oral Factor Xa Inhibitor, Attenuates Atherosclerosis by Alleviating Factor Xa-PAR2-Mediated Autophagy Suppression

The authors showed a mechanism for attenuating atherosclerosis by directly administering an oral factor Xa inhibitor (ie, rivaroxaban [RIV]). The autophagy activity of macrophages was significantly suppressed by factor Xa and was alleviated by the administration of RIV. However, factor Xa failed to inhibit 7-ketocholesterol-induced autophagy and inflammasome activation in protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) knockout macrophages. The atherosclerotic area of apolipoprotein E knockout mice was significantly reduced by the genetic ablation of PAR2, which was partially reversed by chloroquine. Thus, the authors found that RIV attenuates atherogenesis by inhibiting the factor Xa-PAR2-mediated suppression of macrophage autophagy and abrogating inflammasome activity.

Major gastrointestinal bleeding risk with direct oral anticoagulants: Does type and dose matter? - A systematic review and network meta-analysis

The relative risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) among different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is debatable. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with each other are lacking. We performed network meta-analysis to assess whether the risk of major GIB differs based on type and dose of DOAC. Literature search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from inception to August 2019, limited to English publications, was conducted to identify RCTs comparing DOACs with warfarin or enoxaparin for any indication. Primary outcome of interest was major GIB risk. We used frequentist network meta-analysis through the random-effects model to compare DOACs with each other and DOACs by dose to isolate the impact on major GIB. Twenty-eight RCTs, including 139 587 patients receiving six anticoagulants, were selected. The risk of major GIB for DOACs was equal to warfarin. Comparison of DOACs with each other did not show risk differences. After accounting for dose, rivaroxaban 20 mg, dabigatran 300 mg and edoxaban 60 mg daily had 47, 40 and 22% higher rates of major GIB versus warfarin, respectively. Apixaban 5 mg twice daily had lower major GIB compared to dabigatran 300 mg (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.88) and rivaroxaban 20 mg (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.83) daily. Heterogeneity was low, and the model was consistent without publication bias (Egger's test: P = 0.079). All RCTs were high-quality with low risk of bias. DOACs at standard dose, except apixaban, had a higher risk of major GIB compared to warfarin. Apixaban had a lower rate of major GIB compared to dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Is there consensus on the perioperative management of Xa inhibitors in patients undergoing elective spine surgery?-A survey of current spine surgeon practices

BACKGROUND

Factor Xa inhibitors (Xai) are an increasingly common consideration in perioperative anticoagulation management. However, there no existing guidelines established for use in Spine Surgery. This survey study aims to capture current practice trends regarding the perioperative management of Xai among spine surgeons.

METHODS

An 11-question survey was sent to all surgeon members of 3 spinal surgery societies. Responses were remitted anonymously. Questions characterized the background and experience of the respondent and inquired into their current perioperative Xai and other anticoagulant management. Questions were all single-best option, multiple-choice.

RESULTS

A total of 116 surveys were received. Twenty-six (22.4%) were from neurosurgeons and 90 (77.6%) were from orthopedic surgeons. Practiced preoperative Xai hold length tended to be longer than recommended by the respondent's medical colleagues. Only 65.2% (P≤0.0001) of respondents practiced in agreement with the recommendations of their medical colleagues. Postoperative Xai holds trended toward longer holds than that of other anticoagulants with 37.9% (P=0.0125) of respondents showed differences within their own practice between length of Xai hold and length of other anticoagulant holds. One out of four respondents reported noticing a change in the rate of perioperative bleeding complications among Xai patients. Despite reported increased bleeding issues, only 39% of those who noted this increase in bleeding complications reported they would hold a Xai longer than other anticoagulants.

CONCLUSIONS

There exists a wide range of recommended and practiced chronic anticoagulant hold lengths. This inconsistency likely highlights conflicting risk aversion among surgeons, between complications which are viewed as medical (i.e., thromboembolism and stroke) vs. surgical (i.e., compressive hematoma). Yet, survey responses suggest the length of Xai hold times did not necessarily reflect the surgeon's experience with postoperative bleeding complications in Xai patients. These inconsistent practices highlight the need for further research that can establish guidelines for perioperative management of Xai patients undergoing spine surgery.

KEYWORDS

Anticoagulants; factor Xa inhibitors (factor Xai); spine; orthopedic surgery; neurosurgery.