Duodenal ulcer healing by eradication of Helicobacter pylori without anti-acid treatment: randomised controlled trial

Research Trends on Clinical Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1983 to 2020

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies related to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication have been published since the discovery of H. pylori. This study aimed to use a quantitative method to assess the development of this field.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a search of related articles from Web of Science published in 1983-2020 using a combination of the search terms "H. pylori" and "eradication". Eligible studies were included after a two-stage screening process, and the following data were extracted: title, author, institution, country, study type, sample size, eradication regimen, publication year, number of citations, journal, and H-index.

RESULTS

A total of 1402 studies were finally identified. The results showed that the period from 1994-2003 was the most influential period in this field. Italy and the USA were dominant countries in this field, while China's publication number increased sharply in the last ten years. Baylor College of Medicine was the most influential institution. Alimentary Pharmacology Therapeutics was the most productive journal. The effects of H. pylori eradication on peptic ulcers and gastric cancer and H. pylori eradication therapy were the most cited topics in this field. After the publish of Maastricht/Florence Ⅳ guideline, the research of quadruple therapy was more than triple therapy. Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy became the most focused regimen after Maastricht/Florence Ⅴ guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we summarized the characteristics of the publications; identified the most influential countries, institutions, journals; identified the popular research topics and eradication regimen of clinical H. pylori eradication.

Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Koh Kong, Cambodia

Background:

Gastric cancer, which is the leading cause of cancer mortality in Cambodia, can be prevented by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. There is limited data about H. pylori strains in Cambodia. This study aimed to evaluate H. pylori prevalence and antibiotic resistance in Koh Kong, Cambodia.

Methods:

118 Cambodian dyspeptic patients were scheduled to enter this study and 58 were enrolled between July and September 2019. All patients underwent upper GI endoscopy. 3 gastric biopsies were obtained for rapid urease test, H. pylori culture with E-test and GenoType® HelicoDr (Hain Lifescience factory, Germany). 3-mL blood sample was collected for CYP2C19 genotyping.

Results:

58 subjects were enrolled (40 females, 18 males, mean age 43.8 years). Overall H. pylori prevalence was 31.0%. Antibiotic resistance rates were 78.6% for metronidazole, 50.0% for fluoroquinolones, and 27.8% for clarithromycin. There was no amoxicillin and tetracycline resistance. More than half of H. pylori strains (57.1%) were multidrug-resistant. Most (35.7%) were resistant to metronidazole and quinolone. Poor, intermediate and rapid metabolizers were 5.5%, 38.9% and 55.6%, respectively.

Conclusions:

H. pylori infection remains common infection in Cambodia. High prevalence of clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin and multidrug-resistant H. pylori is still major problems in Cambodia. Treatment regimens without clarithromycin and quinolone such as 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy might be an appropriate choice for H. pylori eradication in this particular area.

Management of Antibiotic-Resistant Helicobacter pylori Infection: Perspectives from Vietnam

Antibiotic resistance is the most important factor leading to the failure of eradication regimens. This review focuses on the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori primary and secondary resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, amoxicillin, levofloxacin, tetracycline, and multidrug in Vietnam. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Vietnamese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Vietnamese Biomedical databases from January 2000 to December 2016. The search terms included the following: H. pylori infection, antibiotic (including clarithromycin, metronidazole, amoxicillin, levofloxacin, tetracycline, and multidrug) resistance in Vietnam. The data were summarized in an extraction table and analyzed manually. Finally, Excel 2007 software was used to create charts. Ten studies (three studies in English and seven in Vietnamese) were included in this review. A total of 308, 412, 523, 408, 399, and 268 H. pylori strains were included in this review to evaluate the prevalence of H. pylori primary resistance to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, tetracycline, and multidrug resistance, respectively. Overall, the primary resistance rates of amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, tetracycline, and multidrug resistance were 15.0%, 34.1%, 69.4%, 27.9%, 17.9% and 48.8%, respectively. Secondary resistance rates of amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, tetracycline, and multidrug resistance were 9.5%, 74.9%, 61.5%, 45.7%, 23.5% and 62.3%, respectively. In Vietnam, primary and secondary resistance to H. pylori is increasing over time and affects the effectiveness of H. pylori eradication.

Antibiotic dispensation rates among participants in community-driven health research projects in Arctic Canada

Background

Community-driven projects that aim to address public concerns about health risks from H. pylori infection in Indigenous Arctic communities (estimated H. pylori prevalence = 64%) show frequent failure of treatment to eliminate the bacterium. Among project participants, treatment effectiveness is reduced by antibiotic resistance of infecting H. pylori strains, which in turn, is associated with frequent exposure to antibiotics used to treat other infections. This analysis compares antibiotic dispensation rates in Canadian Arctic communities to rates in urban and rural populations in Alberta, a southern Canadian province.

Methods

Project staff collected antibiotic exposure histories for 297 participants enrolled during 2007–2012 in Aklavik, Tuktoyaktuk, and Fort McPherson in the Northwest Territories, and Old Crow, Yukon. Medical chart reviews collected data on systemic antibiotic dispensations for the 5-year period before enrolment for each participant. Antibiotic dispensation data for urban Edmonton, Alberta (average population ~ 860,000) and rural northern Alberta (average population ~ 450,000) during 2010–2013 were obtained from the Alberta Government Interactive Health Data Application.

Results

Antibiotic dispensation rates, estimated as dispensations/person-years (95% confidence interval) were: in Arctic communities, 0.89 (0.84, 0.94); in Edmonton, 0.55 (0.55, 0.56); in rural northern Alberta, 0.63 (0.62, 0.63). Antibiotic dispensation rates were higher in women and older age groups in all regions. In all regions, the highest dispensation rates occurred for β-lactam and macrolide antibiotic classes.

Conclusions

These results show more frequent antibiotic dispensation in Arctic communities relative to an urban and rural southern Canadian population.

Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS)

This document represents the first position statement produced by the British Society of Gastroenterology and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, setting out the minimum expected standards in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The need for this statement has arisen from the recognition that while technical competence can be rapidly acquired, in practice the performance of a high-quality examination is variable, with an unacceptably high rate of failure to diagnose cancer at endoscopy. The importance of detecting early neoplasia has taken on greater significance in this era of minimally invasive, organ-preserving endoscopic therapy. In this position statement we describe 38 recommendations to improve diagnostic endoscopy quality. Our goal is to emphasise practices that encourage mucosal inspection and lesion recognition, with the aim of optimising the early diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal disease and improving patient outcomes.

A global burden of gastric cancer: the major impact of China

Gastric cancer (GC) is a highly aggressive cancer and a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Approximately half of the world's GC cases and deaths occur in china. GC presents challenges in early diagnosis and effective therapy due to a lack of understanding of the underlying molecular biology. The primary goals of this review are to outline current GC research in china and describe future trends in this field. Areas covered: This review mainly focuses on a series of GC-related advances China has achieved. Considerable progress has been made in understanding the role of H. pylori in GC by a series of population-based studies in well-established high-risk areas; A few germline and somatic alterations have been identified by 'omics' studies; Studies on the mechanisms of malignant phenotypes have helped us to form an in-depth understanding of GC and advance drug discovery. Moreover, identification of potential biomarkers and targeted therapies have facilitated the diagnosis and treatment of GC. However, many challenges remain. Expert commentary: To combat GC, sufficient funding is important. More attention should be paid on early diagnosis and the discovery of novel efficient biomarkers and the development of biomarker-based or targeted therapeutics in GC.

Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease in Helicobacter pylori-positive people

BACKGROUND

Peptic ulcer disease is the cause of dyspepsia in about 10% of people. Ninety-five percent of duodenal and 70% of gastric ulcers are associated with Helicobacter pylori. Eradication of H. pylori reduces the relapse rate of ulcers but the magnitude of this effect is uncertain. This is an update of Ford AC, Delaney B, Forman D, Moayyedi P. Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease in Helicobacter pylori-positive patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD003840. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003840.pub4.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the proportion of peptic ulcers healed and the proportion of participants who remained free from relapse with eradication therapy against placebo or other pharmacological therapies in H. pylori-positive people.To assess the proportion of participants that achieved complete relief of symptoms and improvement in quality of life scores.To compare the incidence of adverse effects/drop-outs (total number for each drug) associated with the different treatments.To assess the proportion of participants in whom successful eradication was achieved.

SEARCH METHODS

In this update, we identified trials by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to March 2016) and Ovid EMBASE (1980 to March 2016). To identify further relevant trials, we handsearched reference lists from trials selected by electronic searching, and published abstracts from conference proceedings from the United European Gastroenterology Week (published in Gut) and Digestive Disease Week (published in Gastroenterology). The search was last updated in March 2016. We contacted members of Cochrane Upper GI and Pancreatic Diseases, and experts in the field and asked them to provide details of outstanding clinical trials and any relevant unpublished materials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We analysed randomised controlled trials of short- and long-term treatment of peptic ulcer disease in H. pylori-positive adults. Participants received at least one week of H. pylori eradication compared with ulcer healing drug, placebo or no treatment. Trials were included if they reported assessment from two weeks onwards.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We collected data on ulcer healing, recurrence, relief of symptoms and adverse effects. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using both fixed-effect and random-effects models with Review Manager software (RevMan 5.3) based on intention-to-treat analysis as far as possible.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 55 trials were included for one or more outcomes for this review.In duodenal ulcer healing, eradication therapy was superior to ulcer healing drug (UHD) (34 trials, 3910 participants, RR of ulcer persisting = 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 0.76; 381/2286 (adjusted proportion: 12.4%) in eradication therapy plus UHD versus 304/1624 (18.7%) in UHD; low quality evidence) and no treatment (two trials, 207 participants, RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.53; 30/125 (adjusted proportion: 21.7%) in eradication therapy versus 48/82 (58.5%) in no treatment; low quality evidence).In gastric ulcer healing, the differences were imprecise between eradication therapy and UHD (15 trials, 1974 participants, RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.68; 220/1192 (adjusted proportion: 16.0%) in eradication therapy plus UHD versus 102/782 (13.0%) in UHD; very low quality evidence). In preventing duodenal ulcer recurrence the differences were imprecise between maintenance therapy with H.pylori eradication therapy and maintenance therapy with UHD (four trials, 319 participants, RR of ulcer recurring 0.73; 95% CI 0.42 to 1.25; 19/159 (adjusted proportion: 11.9%) in eradication therapy versus 26/160 (16.3%) in UHD; very low quality evidence), but eradication therapy was superior to no treatment (27 trials 2509 participants, RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.26; 215/1501 (adjusted proportion: 12.9%) in eradication therapy versus 649/1008 (64.4%) in no treatment; very low quality evidence).In preventing gastric ulcer recurrence, eradication therapy was superior to no treatment (12 trials, 1476 participants, RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.45; 116/697 (adjusted proportion: 16.3%) in eradication therapy versus 356/679 (52.4%) in no treatment; very low quality evidence). None of the trials reported proportion of people with gastric ulcer not healed after initial therapy between H.pylori eradication therapy and no active treatment or the proportion of people with recurrent gastric ulcer or peptic ulcers during maintenance therapy between H.pylori eradication therapy and ulcer healing drug therapy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Adding a one to two-week course of H. pylori eradication therapy is an effective treatment for people with H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcer when compared to ulcer healing drugs alone and no treatment. H. pylori eradication therapy is also effective in preventing recurrence of duodenal and gastric ulcer compared to no treatment. There is currently no evidence that H. pylori eradication therapy is an effective treatment in people with gastric ulcer or that it is effective in preventing recurrence of duodenal ulcer compared to ulcer healing drug. However, confidence intervals were wide and significant benefits or harms of H. pylori eradication therapy in acute ulcer healing of gastric ulcers compared to no treatment, and in preventing recurrence of duodenal ulcers compared to ulcer healing drugs cannot be ruled out.

Antimicrobial susceptibility and clarithromycin resistance patterns of Helicobacter pylori clinical isolates in Vietnam

Helicobacter pylori is a gastric pathogen that causes several gastroduodenal disorders such as peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer.  Eradication efforts of H. pylori are often hampered by antimicrobial resistance in many countries, including Vietnam.  Here, the study aimed to investigate the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance among H. pylori clinical isolates across 13 hospitals in Vietnam.  The study further evaluated the clarithromycin resistance patterns of H. pylori strains.  In order to address the study interests, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, epsilometer test and PCR-based sequencing were performed on a total of 193 strains isolated from patients, including 136 children (3–15 years of age) and 57 adults (19–69 years of age).  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that the overall resistance to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, metronidazole, and tetracycline was 10.4%, 85.5%, 24.4%, 37.8%, and 23.8% respectively.  The distribution of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of clarithromycin-resistant strains was 85.5% with MIC >0.5 μg/mL.  The majority of the clarithromycin resistant isolates (135 of 165 subjects) have MICs ranging from 2 μg/mL to 16 μg/mL.  Furthermore, sequencing detection of mutations in 23S rRNA gene revealed that strains resistant and susceptible to clarithromycin contained both A2143G and T2182C mutations.  Of all isolates, eight clarithromycin-resistant isolates (MIC >0.5 μg/mL) had no mutations in the 23S rRNA gene.  Collectively, these results demonstrated that a proportion of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori strains, which are not related to the 23S rRNA gene mutations, could be potentially related to other mechanisms such as the presence of an efflux pump or polymorphisms in the CYP2C19 gene.  Therefore, the present study suggests that providing susceptibility testing prior to treatment or alternative screening strategies for antimicrobial resistance is important for future clinical practice.  Further studies on clinical guidelines and treatment efficacy are pivotal for successful eradication of H. pylori infection.

Antibiotic Resistance of Helicobacter pylori Among Male United States Veterans

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The most recent information published on resistance of Helicobacter pylori to antibiotics in a large population in the United States is more than 10 years old. We assessed the susceptibility of H pylori to antibiotics among patients in a large metropolitan hospital, as well as demographic, clinical, and lifestyle factors associated with antimicrobial resistance.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study of a random sample of 656 patients (90.2% men) from a cohort of 1559 undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy with collection of gastric biopsies from 2009 through 2013 at the Houston Veterans Affairs Medical Center. We performed culture analyses of gastric tissues to detect H pylori. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, and tetracycline were determined by the Epsilometer test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the association between risk factors and antimicrobial resistance.

RESULTS

Biopsies from 135 subjects (20.6%) tested positive for H pylori; 128 of these were from men (94.8%). Only 65 strains were susceptible to all 5 antibiotics. The prevalence of resistance to levofloxacin was 31.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.1%-39.4%), to metronidazole it was 20.3% (95% CI, 13.2%-27.4%), to clarithromycin it was 16.4% (95% CI, 9.9%-22.9%), and to tetracycline it was 0.8% (95% CI, 0.0%-2.3%). No isolate was resistant to amoxicillin. Clarithromycin resistance increased from 9.1% in 2009-2010 to 24.2% in 2011-2013. In multivariate analysis, prior treatment of H pylori infection and use of fluoroquinolones were significantly associated with clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

H pylori resistance to clarithromycin increased between 2009 and 2013; resistance to metronidazole remains high in infected men in the United States. The high frequency of resistance to levofloxacin is a new and concerning finding.

Complete Genome Sequence of a Metronidazole-Resistant Helicobacter pylori Strain

We report here the complete genome sequence of a metronidazole-resistant Helicobacter pylori strain (MET^r). The MET^r strain was obtained under exposure of H. pylori 26695 on agar plates with low metronidazole concentrations. The genome data provide insight into the genomic changes of H. pylori under selection by metronidazole in vitro.

Search for novel candidate mutations for metronidazole resistance in Helicobacter pylori using next-generation sequencing

Metronidazole resistance is a key factor associated with Helicobacter pylori treatment failure. Although this resistance is mainly associated with mutations in the rdxA and frxA genes, the question of whether metronidazole resistance is caused by the inactivation of frxA alone is still debated. Furthermore, it is unclear whether there are other mutations involved in addition to the two genes that are associated with resistance. A metronidazole-resistant strain was cultured from the metronidazole-susceptible H. pylori strain 26695-1 by exposure to low concentrations of metronidazole. The genome sequences of both susceptible and resistant H. pylori strains were determined by Illumina next-generation sequencing, from which putative candidate resistance mutations were identified. Natural transformation was used to introduce PCR products containing candidate mutations into the susceptible parent strain 26695-1, and the metronidazole MIC was determined for each strain. Mutations in frxA (hp0642), rdxA (hp0954), and rpsU (hp0562) were confirmed by the Sanger method. The mutated sequence in rdxA was successfully transformed into strain 26695-1, and the transformants showed resistance to metronidazole. The transformants containing a single mutation in rdxA showed a low MIC (16 mg/liter), while those containing mutations in both rdxA and frxA showed a higher MIC (48 mg/liter). No transformants containing a single mutation in frxA or rpsU were obtained. Next-generation sequencing was used to identify mutations related to drug resistance. We confirmed that the mutations in rdxA are mainly associated with metronidazole resistance, and mutations in frxA are able to enhance H. pylori resistance only in the presence of rdxA mutations. Moreover, mutations in rpsU may play a role in metronidazole resistance.

Helicobacter pylori: perspectives and time trends

The discovery of Helicobacter pylori three decades ago is a modern medical success story. It markedly changed our understanding of the pathophysiology of gastroduodenal diseases and led to an improvement in the treatment of diseases related to H. pylori infection. Many of these diseases (such as ulcer disease and mucosal associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma) have become curable, and others (gastric cancer) might be preventable with the application of H. pylori eradication therapy. Since its discovery, H. pylori has also been identified as a trigger for some extragastric diseases. Promising results in this exciting field might have a clinical effect in the near future. This Timeline gives an overview of the success of clinical research on H. pylori to date and highlights some future trends in this area.

Discovery of novel mutations for clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori by using next-generation sequencing

OBJECTIVES

Resistance to clarithromycin is the most important factor causing failure of Helicobacter pylori eradication. Although clarithromycin resistance is mainly associated with three point mutations in the 23S rRNA genes, it is unclear whether other mutations are associated with this resistance.

METHODS

Two types of clarithromycin-resistant strains (low- and high-resistance strains) were obtained from clarithromycin-susceptible H. pylori following exposure to low clarithromycin concentrations. The genome sequences were determined with a next-generation sequencer. Natural transformation was used to introduce the candidate mutations into strain 26695. Etest and an agar dilution method were used to determine the MICs.

RESULTS

High-resistance strains contained the mutation A2143G in the 23S rRNA genes, whereas low-resistance strains did not. There were seven candidate mutations in six genes outside of the 23S rRNA genes. The mutated sequences in hp1048 (infB), hp1314 (rpl22) and the 23S rRNA gene were successfully transformed into strain 26695 and the transformants showed an increased MIC of and low resistance to clarithromycin. The transformants containing a single mutation in infB or rpl22 (either a 9 bp insertion or a 3 bp deletion) or the 23S rRNA gene showed low MICs (0.5, 2.0, 4.0 and 32 mg/L, respectively) while the transformants containing double mutations (mutation in the 23S rRNA genes and mutation in infB or rpl22) showed higher MICs (>256 mg/L).

CONCLUSIONS

Next-generation sequencing can be a useful tool for screening mutations related to drug resistance. We discovered novel mutations related to clarithromycin resistance in H. pylori (infB and rpl22), which have synergic effects with 23S rRNA resulting in higher MICs.

Complete Genome Sequences of Helicobacter pylori Clarithromycin-Resistant Strains

We report the complete genome sequences of two Helicobacter pylori clarithromycin-resistant strains. Clarithromycin (CLR)-resistant strains were obtained under the exposure of H. pylori strain 26695 on agar plates with low clarithromycin concentrations. The genome data provide insights into the genomic changes of H. pylori under selection by clarithromycin in vitro.

The incidence of primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori in Vietnam

GOALS

To determine the susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from a Vietnamese population to 5 antibiotics.

BACKGROUND

The incidence of antibiotic resistance in H. pylori infection is increasing worldwide and has become a leading cause for failure of treatment. Antibiotic susceptibility testing is very important to provide optimal regimens in a clinical setting.

STUDY

We isolated 103 H. pylori strains from the gastric mucosa of H. pylori-infected patients from 2 areas in Vietnam (Ho Chi Minh and Hanoi) in 2008. Epsilometer test was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations of amoxicillin, clarithromycin (CLR), metronidazole (MNZ), levofloxacin, and tetracycline.

RESULTS

Among the 103 strains, the resistance rates were 0% (amoxicillin), 33% (CLR), 69.9% (MNZ), 18.4% (levofloxacin), and 5.8% (tetracycline). The resistant strains showed a high-level of resistance (≥ 256 µg/mL) to CLR, 23.5% (8/34), and MNZ, 29.1% (21/72). The resistance rate for CLR was significantly higher in Ho Chi Minh than in Hanoi (49% vs. 18.5%, P=0.001). Resistance to both CLR and MNZ was most commonly observed (24.3%). Two strains (1.9%) were resistant to 4 of the 5 antibiotics. No significant association was observed between antibiotic resistance rates and age, sex, or clinical outcomes of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

High incidence of resistance to CLR and MNZ suggests that standard triple therapies may not be useful as first-line treatment in Vietnam. Alternative strategies such as bismuth-based quadruple therapies or sequential therapy may be more effective in Vietnam.

Strategies for peptic ulcer healing after 1 week proton pump inhibitor-based triple Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in Japanese patients: differences of gastric ulcers and duodenal ulcers

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy alone is insufficient to ensure healing of large ulcers with H. pylori-positive gastric ulcer (GU). The question of what is the optimum antiulcer treatment following H. pylori eradication therapy has not been fully elucidated. Furthermore, the ulcer healing effects of eradication therapy itself with H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcer (DU) have not been investigated. In GU study, the eradication therapy + proton pump inhibitor (PPI) group (group A) were administered eradication therapy followed by 7 weeks of a PPI, and the eradication therapy + gastroprotective drug (GP) group (group B) eradication therapy followed by 7 weeks of a GP. In DU study, the eradication therapy + PPI group (group C) were administered eradication therapy followed by 5 weeks of a PPI, and the eradication therapy only group (group D) was eradication therapy alone. In GU study, healing rates for ulcer of ≥15 mm in diameter were significant greater in the group A. In DU study, high healing rates were seen both the group C and D. In conclusion, a PPI could significantly heal GU than a GP after eradication therapy in GU. Meanwhile, the eradication alone is sufficient for DU.

Antimicrobial therapy of peptic ulcers

It is now accepted that peptic ulcer disease, whether duodenal or gastric, is one manifestation of infection with the bacterium Helicobacter pylori. This realization has revolutionized the management of peptic ulcer disease and changed the dictum from no acid no ulcer, to no H. pylori, no ulcer. When confronted with a patient with peptic ulcer disease, the physician must now ask whether H. pylori infection is present and if so, attempt to cure it. The gastric milieu is a very difficult environment for effective antimicrobial therapy. Nevertheless, current multi-drug antimicrobial therapy can be expected to cure the infection in more than 80% of patients. Cure of the infection is associated with a very low rate of recurrence. The continued risk of serious disease or disease complications associated with treatment failure and the availability of the urea breath test to non-invasively assess the results of therapy suggest that post therapy assessment should be routine. Because H. pylori infection causes structural and functional damage to the stomach and is associated with a lifetime risk of peptic or gastric cancer of approximately 16 and 1%, respectively, the infection should be treated whenever it is diagnosed. This paper reviews the current approach to therapy of patients with H. pylori infection, the effective antimicrobial drug combinations end the factors that predict treatment failure. Emergence of antimicrobial resistance may soon undermine the effectiveness of current drug regimens and require pretreatment culture and sensitivity testing as well as development of new drugs and drug regimens.

Marshall and Warren Lecture 2009: peptic ulcer bleeding: an expedition of 20 years from 1989-2009

Peptic ulcer bleeding is one of the most common medical emergencies leading to substantial mortality and morbidity. The last two decades has witnessed some important advances in the management of this condition, and some of these are results from clinical trials conducted in the Asia Pacific region. The optimal use of combined endoscopic hemostasis and the use of pharmacologic control of acid secretion in the stomach have significantly improved clinical outcome. The role of surgery has been redefined. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection and prophylactic treatment in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and anti-platelet users have made progress in preventing recurrence of peptic ulcer and bleeding. Instead of merely focusing on safety in the gastrointestinal tract, striking a balance between risk and benefit of continuing anti-platelet agents should be a top agenda.

Peptic ulcer disease

Peptic ulcer disease had a tremendous effect on morbidity and mortality until the last decades of the 20th century, when epidemiological trends started to point to an impressive fall in its incidence. Two important developments are associated with the decrease in rates of peptic ulcer disease: the discovery of effective and potent acid suppressants, and of Helicobacter pylori. With the discovery of H pylori infection, the causes, pathogenesis, and treatment of peptic ulcer disease have been rewritten. We focus on this revolution of understanding and management of peptic ulcer disease over the past 25 years. Despite substantial advances, this disease remains an important clinical problem, largely because of the increasingly widespread use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and low-dose aspirin. We discuss the role of these agents in the causes of ulcer disease and therapeutic and preventive strategies for drug-induced ulcers. The rare but increasingly problematic H pylori-negative NSAID-negative ulcer is also examined.

Non-invasive diagnosis of H pylori infection: Evaluation of serological tests with and without current infection marker CIM

AIM: To evaluate the performance of commercially available immunochromatographic (ICT) and immunoblot tests covering the current infection marker CIM and conventional ELISA for the diagnosis of H pylori infection in adult dyspeptic patients.

METHODS: Consecutive non-treated dyspeptic patients undergoing diagnostic endoscopy were tested for H pylori infection by culture, rapid urease test, and histology of gastric biopsy specimens. Serum from 61 H pylori infected and 21 non-infected patients were tested for anti-H pylori IgG antibodies by commercial ELISA (AccuBind^TM ELISA, Monobind, USA), ICT (Assure^®H pylori Rapid Test, Genelabs Diagnostics, Singapore), and immunoblot (Helico Blot 2.1, Genelabs Diagnostics, Singapore) assays. ICT and immunoblot kits cover CIM among other parameters and their performance with and without CIM was evaluated separately.

RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of ELISA were 96.7%, 42.8%, 83.1%, 81.8%, and 82.9%, of ICT were 90.1%, 80.9%, 93.2%, 73.9%, and 87.8%, of ICT with CIM were 88.5%, 90.4%, 96.4%, 73.0%, and 89.0%, of immunoblot were 98.3%, 80.9%, 93.7%, 94.4%, and 93.9%, and of immunoblot with CIM were 98.3%, 90.4%, 96.7%, 95.0%, and 96.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Immunoblot with CIM had the best performance. ICT with CIM was found to be more specific and accurate than the conventional ELISA and may be useful for non-invasive diagnosis of H pylori infection.

Nitrofuran-based regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

Several aspects of Helicobacter pylori eradication have been meta-analyzed; however, nitrofuran-based therapies constitute an exception. The aim of this study was the systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of furazolidone- and nitrofurantoin-based regimens in the eradication of infection. Studies evaluating the effects of nitrofurans on H. pylori were identified from Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and congress abstracts. The studies were classified into groups based on first-, second- and third-line regimens. The pooled eradication rates and combined odd ratios of the individual studies were calculated and compared with the published meta-analysis. The factors influencing the efficiency of the regimens were also analyzed. Side-effects of nitrofuran-based regimens were also analyzed. The pooled eradication rate of primary proton pump inhibitor-based regimens containing furazolidone was 76.3% (CI 67.8-84.2). The odds ratio for furazolidone-based regimens versus standard triple therapies was 2.34 (CI 0.76-3.92). Ranitidine bismuth citrate + furazolidone-based triple regimens were equally efficient (83.5%, CI 74.0-93.0, P = 0.06 versus triple therapies). Schedules including a H(2) antagonist + furazolidone + one other antibiotic achieved pooled eradication rates of 79.9% (CI 67.8-89.9, P = 0.04). Bismuth-based triple therapies achieved 84.5% (CI 72.6-93.0, P = 0.002). Primary quadruple regimens containing furazolidone were superior to triple therapies (83.4%, CI 69.7-92.3, P = 0.01). Second-line schedules containing furazolidone obtained eradication rates of 76.1% (CI 66.4-85.0, P = 0.28 versus primary regimens). Third-line 'rescue' therapies were efficient in 65.5% of the cases (CI 56.3-75.5, P = 0.0001). Side-effects of the regimens containing furazolidone were more frequent than in standard therapies (P = 0.02). The combined odds ratio of side-effects for furazolidone-based versus standard therapies was 0.74 (CI 0.32-1.98). The duration of treatment, but not the furazolidone dose, influenced the treatment outcome. Primary triple regimens containing furazolidone are slightly less efficient than the standard primary combinations; primary quadruple regimens were more efficient than triple therapies. Furazolidone is also efficient as a component of second-line or rescue therapies.

Helicobacter pylori and benign upper digestive disease

Acute infection with Helicobacter pylori causes hypochlorhydria and gastrointestinal upset. As the infection persists, patients develop chronic antral-predominant or pangastritis. Gastric and duodenal ulcers arise from chronic mucosal inflammation and disordered acid secretion in the stomach. With successful eradication of H. pylori, non-NSAID-related gastric and duodenal ulcers heal even without long-term acid suppression. More importantly, peptic ulcers and their complications rarely recur. Clearing H. pylori infection also reduces the risk of mucosal injury in NSAID and aspirin users; the protective effects are more pronounced in NSAID-naïve and aspirin users. H. pylori is unlikely to be the cause of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. However, a patient's reflux symptoms may be more difficult to control after clearing the infection. Although there is little evidence to support a causal relationship between H. pylori and non-ulcer dyspepsia, treatment of the infection gives a modest improvement of symptoms.

Comparison of the efficacy of rabeprazole 10 mg and omeprazole 20 mg for the healing rapidity of peptic ulcer diseases

AIM

Rabeprazole has been known to inhibit H(+)/K(+)-ATPase more rapidly than omeprazole, the prototype proton pump inhibitor (PPI). The aim of this study was to demonstrate equivalence between low-dose rabeprazole 10 mg and omeprazole 20 mg for the healing rapidity of active peptic ulcer and for improvement of symptoms. Also, the effect of CYP2C19 genotypes on ulcer healing rapidity was investigated.

METHODS

A total of 112 patients with active peptic ulcer were randomized to receive either rabeprazole 10 mg q.d. or omeprazole 20 mg q.d. for 6 weeks. The remaining ratios (%) and complete healing of the ulcer were determined by endoscopy at 1 week and 6 weeks of treatment. The severity of ulcer pain was also investigated during treatment. CYP2C19 genotype was determined by the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method.

RESULTS

The remaining ratio of peptic ulcers after 1 week and the complete healing rate after 6 weeks in the rabeprazole versus omeprazole group were 45.5% versus 50.3% (P = 0.475) and 80.6% versus 87.0% (P = 0.423), respectively. CYP2C19 genotypes had no effect on the remaining ratio of peptic ulcers after 1 week and the healing rate of peptic ulcers after 6 weeks in both groups. The proportions of patients with symptom improvement or resolution were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose rabeprazole 10 mg has a similar efficacy for the healing rapidity of active peptic ulcer disease and symptom improvement compared with standard-dose omeprazole 20 mg.

Maintenance therapy with H2-receptor antagonist until assessment of Helicobacter pylori eradication can reduce recurrence of peptic ulcer after successful eradication of the organism: prospective randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

This study examined the possible relationship between peptic ulcer recurrence and the presence or absence of maintenance therapy with an H(2)-receptor antagonist performed until evaluation of Helicobacter pylori eradication.

METHODS

The subjects were 483 patients with peptic ulcer (281 gastric ulcer and 202 duodenal ulcer) who were diagnosed as H. pylori positive. After receiving eradication therapy for H. pylori, patients were allocated at random to one of three different maintenance therapies: control group (no maintenance therapy), H(2)-receptor antagonist half-dose group, and H(2)-receptor antagonist full-dose group. The maintenance therapy was performed for 4 weeks until evaluation of H. pylori eradication.

RESULTS

Among the 25 patients with a recurrent ulcer, 18 patients (72%) had a recurrence at the time of or before evaluation of H. pylori eradication. In the control group, the rate of ulcer recurrence occurring before evaluation of H. pylori eradication was 10.5% (14/133). This rate was significantly higher than those in the H(2)-receptor antagonist half-dose group (2.9%, 4/136) and the full-dose group (0%, 0/135).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that maintenance therapy with an H(2)-receptor antagonist performed after eradication therapy until evaluation of H. pylori eradication is likely to greatly reduce the ulcer recurrence rate without affecting evaluation of H. pylori eradication.

Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease in Helicobacter pylori positive patients

BACKGROUND

Peptic ulcer disease is the cause for dyspepsia in about 10% of patients. 95% of duodenal and 70% of gastric ulcers are associated with Helicobacter pylori. Eradication of H pylori reduces the relapse rate of ulcers but the magnitude of this effect is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

The primary outcomes were the proportion of peptic ulcers healed initially and proportion of patients free from relapse following successful healing. Eradication therapy was compared to placebo or pharmacological therapies in H. pylori positive patients. Secondary aims included symptom relief and adverse effects.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches were conducted on the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL (which includes the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3 2002) MEDLINE (1966 to July 2002) and EMBASE (1980 to July 2002). Reference lists from trials selected by electronic searching were handsearched to identify further relevant trials. Published abstracts from conference proceedings from the United European Gastroenterology Week (published in Gut) and Digestive Disease Week (published in Gastroenterology) were handsearched. The search was updated in September 2003, November 2004 and November 2005. Members of the Cochrane UGPD Group, and experts in the field were contacted and asked to provide details of outstanding clinical trials and any relevant unpublished materials

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of short and long-term treatment of peptic ulcer disease in H. pylori positive adults were analysed. Patients received at least one week of H pylori eradication compared with ulcer healing drug, placebo or not treatment. Trials were included if they reported assessment from 2 weeks onwards.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were collected on ulcer healing, recurrence, relief of symptoms and adverse effects.

MAIN RESULTS

63 trials were eligible. Data extraction was not possible in 7 trials, and 56 trials were included. In duodenal ulcer healing, eradication therapy was superior to ulcer healing drug (UHD) (34 trials, 3910 patients, relative risk [RR] of ulcer persisting = 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58, 0.76) and no treatment (2 trials, 207 patients, RR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.26, 0.53). In gastric ulcer healing, no significant differences were detected between eradication therapy and UHD (14 trials, 1572 patients, RR = 1.25; 95% CI = 0.88, 1.76). In preventing duodenal ulcer recurrence no significant differences were detected between eradication therapy and maintenance therapy with UHD (4 trials, 319 patients, relative risk [RR] of ulcer recurring = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.42, 1.25), but eradication therapy was superior to no treatment (27 trials 2509 patients, RR = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.15, 0.26). In preventing gastric ulcer recurrence, eradication therapy was superior to no treatment (11 trials, 1104 patients, RR = 0.29; 95% CI 0.20, 0.42).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

A 1 to 2 weeks course of H. pylori eradication therapy is an effective treatment for H. pylori positive peptic ulcer disease.

Helicobacter pylori extract induces nuclear factor-kappa B, activator protein-1, and cyclooxygenase-2 in esophageal epithelial cells

Helicobacter pylori infection is recognized as the major cause of gastritis and gastric cancer; however, its role in the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's adenocarcinoma is unclear. The expression of NF-kappaB, AP-1, and COX-2 may be important in inflammation and tumorigenesis in the esophagus. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of live H pylori or H pylori extract (HPE) on these factors in the esophageal epithelial cell lines SKGT-4 and OE33. NF-kappaB and AP-1 activity were assessed by gel shift assay and COX-2 by Western blotting. Coculture of SKGT-4 and OE33 with live H pylori and HPE induced NF-kappaB and AP-1 DNA-binding activity, and also decreased IkappaB-alpha levels. Treatment with the specific MEK1/2 MAPK inhibitor PD98059, but not the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580, inhibited NF-kappaB and AP-1 activity. The antioxidant vitamin C inhibited H pylori-induced NF-kappaB activation, but increased AP-1 expression. Moreover, HPE induced COX-2 expression and IL-8 production, and PD98059 inhibited COX-2 expression, ERK1/2 phosphorylation, and IL-8 production. These data demonstrate that both live H pylori and HPE induce NF-kappaB and AP-1 expression in esophageal epithelial cells. The induction of such transcription factors may play a role in the specific immune response within Barrett's mucosa and may indirectly cause inflammation of the gastric cardia and the distal esophagus.

A pilot study to evaluate a new combination therapy for gastric ulcer: Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy followed by gastroprotective treatment with rebamipide

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Controversies remain over the need for antiulcer treatment following 1-week eradication triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori-positive peptic ulcers. The usefulness of combination therapy for gastric ulcers in Japanese patients, which consists of H. pylori eradication followed by gastroprotective therapy with rebamipide, was therefore evaluated.

METHODS

The study was conducted in 52 H. pylori-positive patients with an endoscopically-proven open gastric ulcer. All patients received 1-week triple therapy (lansoprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin) followed by 7-week rebamipide therapy. After completion of the combination therapy, all patients underwent evaluation of ulcer healing by endoscopy, gastric ulcer symptoms and H. pylori eradication by rapid urease test and (13)C-urea breath test.

RESULTS

The ulcer healing rates were 85.7% (36/42) at 8 weeks, 83.3% (30/36) in eradicated patients and 100% (6/6) in non-eradicated patients. The overall gastrointestinal symptom-free rate improved from 19.0% at baseline to 88.1% at 8 weeks. H. pylori was effectively eradicated in 85.7% (36/42) of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested that the combination therapy for open gastric ulcer was safe, well-tolerated and effective. However, data from a double-blind placebo-controlled study is necessary to confirm these findings.

Cost-effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori "test and treat" for patients with typical reflux symptoms in a population with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection: a Markov model analysis

OBJECTIVE

Patients with typical reflux symptoms may have underlying peptic ulcer disease (PUD) in a population with a high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection. In the present study we sought to compare the cost-effectiveness of the H. pylori "test and treat" strategy with that of empirical proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and endoscopy in patients with typical reflux and a high prevalence of H. pylori infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A Markov model was designed to compare the outcomes of three treatment strategies over 12 months among a hypothetical cohort of patients presenting with typical reflux symptoms. There were four exclusive underlying H. pylori- and PUD-related comorbidities in the hypothetical cohort: (1) H. pylori-related PUD, (2) H. pylori infection without PUD, (3) PUD without H. pylori infection and (4) absence of both PUD and H. pylori infection. The transition probabilities and resource utilization were derived from the literature. Percentage of PUD patients treated, total number of symptom-free patient-years gained and total direct medical cost were estimated.

RESULTS

By comparing each strategy individually with the no therapy strategy, it was found that the incremental costs per ulcer treated for H. pylori "test and treat", endoscopy and empirical PPI therapy were USD 1778, USD 1797 and USD 2158, respectively. The results of the model were sensitive to the prevalence of H. pylori infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the H. pylori "test and treat" and initial endoscopic strategies were shown to be more cost-effective than empirical PPI therapy for treating undiagnosed PUD among patients presenting with typical reflux symptoms. The H. pylori "test and treat" strategy appeared to be only slightly more cost-effective than initial endoscopy in a population with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection.

Perforated peptic ulcer treated by simple closure and Helicobacter pylori eradication

Simple closure followed by Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication has become the most used procedure in perforated ulcer treatment. However, its efficacy and safety are still to be determined. To assess recurrence and re-perforation rates, and as a secondary objective, to analyze Hp infection rates in perforated ulcer patients and controls, we conducted a prospective study. Ninety-two consecutive patients (ages: 19-96 years) were operated on between 1996 and 2002, and treated by simple closure followed by Hp eradication and NSAID avoidance. The data were prospectively collected in a database. Hp infection was diagnosed in 68 patients (73.9%). Thirty-four patients (37%) consumed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and 23 (25%) had both Hp infection and NSAID antecedents. The perforation was gastric in 4 cases and pre-pyloric, pyloric or duodenal in 88. There were postoperative complications in 24 patients (26%) and 4 patients died (4.3%). Hp eradication was shown in 46 patients. There was clinical ulcer recurrence in 4 (4.3%); in 3 of them recurrence manifested as re-perforation, all in gastric locations. Overall relapse and re-perforation 1-year crude rates were 6.1% and 4.1%, respectively. Crude rates for non-gastric ulcer recurrence were 0 at 1 year and 2.6% at 2 years and for non-gastric ulcer re-perforation rates were 0 at 1 and 2 years. This therapeutic strategy is associated with a low rate of recurrence and no re-perforations in case of duodenal, pyloric, or pre-pyloric perforated ulcers, but it is not acceptable for perforated gastric ulcers.

Long-term outcome of Helicobacter pylori-negative idiopathic bleeding ulcers: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Helicobacter pylori-negative idiopathic ulcers are increasingly recognized. The secular trend and long-term outcome of this condition are unknown.

METHODS

We prospectively studied consecutive patients with bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers from January to December 2000. The incidence and etiology of ulcers during this period were compared with that between September 1997 and August 1998. H. pylori-negative idiopathic ulcers were defined as negative tests for H. pylori, no exposure to analgesics within 4 weeks, and absence of other risk factors for ulcers. After the ulcers had healed, patients with H. pylori-negative idiopathic ulcers and patients with H. pylori ulcers who received eradication therapy were followed up for 12 months without anti-ulcer drugs.

RESULTS

Six hundred thirty-eight patients had bleeding ulcers: 213 (33.4%) were H. pylori ulcers, and 120 (18.8%) were H. pylori-negative idiopathic ulcers (vs 480 [50.3%] H. pylori ulcers and 40 [4.2%] H. pylori-negative idiopathic ulcers in 1997-1998; P < .001). H. pylori-negative idiopathic ulcers accounted for 16.1% of patients who were admitted for bleeding and 42.4% of patients who bled while in the hospital (P < .0001); 28.3% of patients with H. pylori-negative idiopathic ulcers had histologic evidence of past H. pylori infection. The probability of recurrent ulcer complications in 12 months was 13.4% (95% CI: 7.3%-19.5%) in patients with H. pylori-negative idiopathic ulcers and 2.5% (95% CI: 0.4%-4.6%) in patients with H. pylori ulcers who received eradication therapy (P = .0002).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of H. pylori-negative idiopathic bleeding ulcers is rising. These ulcers are prone to recurrent complications.

Systematic review and meta-analysis: is 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy sufficient to heal peptic ulcer?

AIMS

To systematically review the efficacy on ulcer healing of 1-week combination of a proton pump inhibitor plus two antibiotics and to perform a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to evaluate whether 7 days of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy is sufficient to heal peptic ulcer.

METHODS

Studies where 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy was administered to heal peptic ulcer were included. Randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy on ulcer healing of 7-day proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy versus this same regimen but prolonging the proton pump inhibitor for several more weeks were included in the meta-analysis. Electronic and manual bibliographical searches were conducted. Meta-analysis was performed combining the odds ratios of the individual studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies (2342 patients) assessed ulcer healing with 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy. Mean healing rate was 86%, and 95% in Helicobacter pylori-eradicated patients. Six studies (862 patients), were included in the meta-analysis. Mean ulcer healing rate with a 7-day treatment was 91% versus 92% when proton pump inhibitor was prolonged for 2-4 more weeks (odds ratio = 1.11; 95% confidence interval = 0.71-1.74).

CONCLUSION

In patients with peptic ulcer and H. pylori infection, prolonging therapy with proton pump inhibitor after a triple therapy for 7 days with a proton pump inhibitor and two antibiotics is not necessary to induce ulcer healing.

Helicobacter pylori eradication as the sole treatment for gastric and duodenal ulcers

OBJECTIVES

It is uncertain whether eradication of Helicobacter pylori--without a prolonged suppression of acid secretion--is sufficient to allow healing of peptic ulcers. We evaluated whether eradication of H. pylori with no following anti-secretory medication then administered is sufficient for treatment of peptic ulcers. We also looked at the impact of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) use on ulcer relapses.

METHODS

The effect of eradication on ulcer healing and relapse rate was analysed in 115 patients, randomly allocated to four treatment groups: (1) quadruple therapy (28); (2) dual therapy (n-30); (3) triple therapy (n=27); and (4) lansoprazole and placebo (n=30). Endoscopic assessment was performed at 0, 8, and 52 weeks.

RESULTS

The ulcer healing rate was 100% [95% confidence interval (CI), 95-100%] in H. pylori-negative and 83% (95% CI, 67-94%) in H. pylori-positive patients (P<0.01). In patients who used NSAIDS or ASA, the healing rates was 100% (95% CI, 73-100%) and 75% (95% CI, 19-99%) in H. pylori-negative (12 patients) and H. pylori-positive patients (four patients) (P = not significant). Ulcer relapses occurred in 5% (95% CI, 1-13%) of H. pylori-negative and in 36% (95% CI, 19-56%) of H. pylori-positive patients (P < 0.01). In H. pylori-negative patients who used NSAIDs or ASA the ulcer relapse rate was 30% (95% CI, 7-65%), whereas the ulcer relapse rate was 2% (95% CI, 0.4-10%) in patients who did not use NSAIDs or ASA (P < 0.05). No difference in ulcer relapse rate in H. pylori-positive patients who used or did not use NSAIDs or ASA was found. The eradication rate of H. pylori was 93% (95% CI, 76-99%) in the quadruple therapy group, 83% (95% CI, 64-94%) in the dual therapy group, 100% (95% CI, 87-100%) in the triple therapy group, and 0% (95% CI, 0-12%) in the lansoprazole and placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Eradication treatment for H. pylori-positive gastric or duodenal ulcer is sufficient, with no need to follow it with anti-secretory medication. Cure of the infection reduces ulcer relapses in patients who did not use NSAIDs or ASA.

Meta-analysis: the efficacy, adverse events, and adherence related to first-line anti-Helicobacter pylori quadruple therapies

BACKGROUND

Owing to rising drug-resistant Helicobacter pylori infections, currently recommended proton-pump inhibitor-based triple therapies are losing their efficacy, and regimens efficacious in the presence of drug resistance are needed.

AIMS

To summarize the efficacy, safety and adherence of first-line quadruple H. pylori therapies in adults.

METHODS

Meta-regression models identified factors explaining variation in the efficacy of first-line quadruple therapies from 145 treatment arms. Estimates of average efficacy were calculated within homogeneous groups.

RESULTS

Quadruple therapy containing a gastric acid inhibitor, bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline was enhanced when omeprazole was included, treatment duration lasted 10-14 days, and when therapy took place in the Netherlands, Hong Kong and Australia. Treatment efficacy decreased as the prevalence of metronidazole resistance increased. Even in areas with a high prevalence of metronidazole resistance, this quadruple regimen eradicated more than 85% of H. pylori infections when it contained omeprazole and was given for 10-14 days. Furthermore, in the presence of clarithromycin resistance, this quadruple regimen eradicated 90-100% of H. pylori infections, while the currently recommended triple therapy containing clarithromycin, amoxicillin and a proton-pump inhibitor eradicated only 25-61% (P < 0.001). Adherence and adverse events for quadruple therapy were similar to currently recommended triple therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines should include quadruple therapy with a proton-pump inhibitor, a bismuth compound, metronidazole and tetracycline among recommended first-line anti-H. pylori therapies.

Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease in Helicobacter pylori positive patients

BACKGROUND

Peptic ulcer disease is the cause for dyspepsia in about 10% of patients. 95% of duodenal and 70% of gastric ulcers are associated with Helicobacter pylori. Eradication of H pylori reduces the relapse rate of ulcers but the magnitude of this effect is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

The primary outcomes were the proportion of peptic ulcers healed initially and proportion of patients free from relapse following successful healing. Eradication therapy was compared to placebo or pharmacological therapies in H. pylori positive patients. Secondary aims included symptom relief and adverse effects.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search was undertaken according to the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Review Group module using CCTR, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. Experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies were contacted. Abstract books between 1994 and 2003 were hand-searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of short and long-term treatment of peptic ulcer disease in H. pylori positive adults were analysed. Patients received at least one week of H pylori eradication compared with ulcer healing drug, placebo or not treatment. Trials were included if they reported assessment from 2 weeks onwards.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were collected on ulcer healing, recurrence, relief of symptoms and adverse effects.

MAIN RESULTS

60 trials were eligible. Data extraction was not possible in 7 trials, and 53 trials were included. In duodenal ulcer healing, eradication therapy was superior to ulcer healing drug (UHD) (34 trials, 3910 patients, relative risk [RR] of ulcer persisting = 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58, 0.76) and no treatment (2 trials, 207 patients, RR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.26, 0.53). In gastric ulcer healing, no significant differences were detected between eradication therapy and UHD (13 trials, 1469 patients, RR = 1.32; 95% CI = 0.92, 1.90). In preventing duodenal ulcer recurrence no significant differences were detected between eradication therapy and maintenance therapy with UHD (4 trials, 319 patients, relative risk [RR] of ulcer recurring = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.42, 1.25), but eradication therapy was superior to no treatment (27 trials 2509 patients, RR = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.15, 0.26). In preventing gastric ulcer recurrence, eradication therapy was superior to no treatment (10 trials, 1029 patients, RR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.18, 0.43).

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

A 1 to 2 weeks course of H. pylori eradication therapy is an effective treatment for H. pylori positive peptic ulcer disease.

Pre-treatment urea breath test results predict the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in patients with active duodenal ulcers

AIM: To evaluate the association of pre-treatment ¹³C-urea breath test (UBT) results with H pylori density and efficacy of eradication therapy in patients with active duodenal ulcers.

METHODS: One hundred and seventeen consecutive outpatients with active duodenal ulcer and H pylori infection were recruited. H pylori density was histologically graded according to the Sydney system. Each patient received lansoprazole (30 mg b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.) and amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.) for 1 week. According to pre-treatment UBT values, patients were allocated into low ( < 16‰), intermediate (16‰-35‰), and high ( > 35‰) UBT groups.

RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between pre-treatment UBT results and H pylori density (P < 0.001). H pylori eradication rates were 94.9%, 94.4% and 81.6% in the low, intermediate and high UBT groups, respectively (per protocol analysis, P = 0.11). When patients were assigned into two groups (UBT results ≤ 35‰ and > 35‰), the eradication rates were 94.7% and 81.6%, respectively (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION: The intragastric bacterial load of H pylori can be evaluated by UBT, and high pre-treatment UBT results can predict an adverse outcome of eradication therapy.

Current management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding

Endoscopic therapy is now the first-line treatment for the management of acute ulcer bleeding. Of the many endoscopic methods available, combination treatment using adrenaline injection to arrest the active bleeding, followed by thermal or electrical coagulation to seal the vessel, is currently the most popular. Endoscopic ulcer haemostasis is technically demanding, and indiscriminate extrapolation of results of published trials without reference to the expertise available locally may be dangerous. The cost-effectiveness of a routine second-look endoscopy has not been established, but repeat treatment in those who have rebled has shown good results in experienced hands. Current evidence supports the use of a proton-pump inhibitor to prevent acid-pepsin digestion of the blood clot plugging the eroded blood vessel. Interplay between acid, Helicobacter, NSAID and 'stress' results in peptic ulceration. Eradication of Helicobacter is an important measure in the secondary prevention of ulcer bleeding. The inability to measure blood flow in the eroded artery before and after treatment, to reliably seal a large blood vessel and to detect rebleeding before significant blood loss are limiting factors in the current management of ulcer bleeding.

Density of Helicobacter pylori may affect the efficacy of eradication therapy and ulcer healing in patients with active duodenal ulcers

AIM: To evaluate the association of pre-treatment Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) density with bacterial eradication and ulcer healing rates in patients with active duodenal ulcer.

METHODS: One hundred and four consecutive duodenal ulcer outpatients with H. pylori infection ascertained by gastric histopathology and ¹³C-urea breath test (UBT) were enrolled in this study. H. pylori density was graded histologically according to the Sydney system (normal, mild, moderate, and marked). In each patient, lansoprazole (30 mg b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.) and amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.) were used for 1 wk, then 30 mg lansoprazole once daily was continued for an additional 3 wk. Follow-up endoscopy was performed at 4 wk after completion of the therapy, and UBT was done at 4 and 8 wk after completion of the therapy.

RESULTS: The H. pylori eradication rates were 88.9%/100.0%, 94.3%/100.0%, and 69.7%/85.2%; and the ulcer healing rates were 88.9%/100.0%, 94.3%/100.0%, and 63.6%/77.8% (intention-to-treat/per protocol analysis) in the mild, moderate, and marked H. pylori density groups, respectively. The association of pretreatment H. pylori density with the eradication rate and ulcer healing rate was both statistically significant (P = 0.013/0.006 and 0.002/< 0.001, respectively; using results of intention-to-treat/per protocol analysis).

CONCLUSION: Intragastric bacterial load may affect both the outcome of eradication treatment and ulcer healing in patients with active duodenal ulcer disease.

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and its association with the disease.

DESIGN

Systematic review of studies reporting the prevalence of H pylori in patients with and without gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

DATA SOURCES

Four electronic databases, searched to November 2001, experts, pharmaceutical companies, and journals.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Odds ratio for prevalence of H pylori in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

RESULTS

20 studies were included. The pooled estimate of the odds ratio for prevalence of H pylori was 0.60 (95% confidence interval 0.47 to 0.78), indicating a lower prevalence in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Substantial heterogeneity was observed between studies. Location seemed to be an important factor, with a much lower prevalence of H pylori in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in studies from the Far East, despite a higher overall prevalence of infection than western Europe and North America. Year of study was not a source of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of H pylori infection was significantly lower in patients with than without gastro-oesophageal reflux, with geographical location being a strong contributor to the heterogeneity between studies. Patients from the Far East with reflux disease had a lower prevalence of H pylori infection than patients from western Europe and North America, despite a higher prevalence in the general population.

Bismuth-based quadruple therapy using a single capsule of bismuth biskalcitrate, metronidazole, and tetracycline given with omeprazole versus omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer patients: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, North American trial

OBJECTIVES

This multicenter, randomized, active-controlled trial assessed efficacy of bismuth-based quadruple therapy with omeprazole, bismuth biskalcitrate, metronidazole, and tetracycline (OBMT) using a single-triple capsule of BMT compared with triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin (OAC) in treatment of patients with Helicobacter pylori infection and duodenal ulcers.

METHODS

Patients with active duodenal ulcer or diagnosed within the past 5 yr and with infection documented by (13)C-urea breath test plus histology or culture were randomly assigned to 10-day course of OBMT using a single-triple capsule containing bismuth biskalcitrate 140 mg, metronidazole 125 mg, and tetracycline 125 mg given as three capsules q.i.d. with omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., or a 10-day course of OAC, omeprazole 20 mg plus amoxicillin 1 g plus clarithromycin 500 mg, all b.i.d. Eradication was confirmed by two negative urea breath tests at >1 month and >2 months after therapy.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-eight patients received OBMT and 137 OAC. Modified intent-to-treat eradication rates were 87.7% for OBMT and 83.2% for OAC (95% CI = -3.9%-12.8%; p = 0.29). OBMT eradicated 91.7% metronidazole-sensitive and 80.4% metronidazole-resistant strains (p = 0.06). OAC eradicated 92.1% clarithromycin sensitive and 21.4% clarithromycin-resistant strains (p < 0.001). Adverse events occurred in 58.5% of OBMT patients and 59.0% of OAC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

OBMT regimen using the single-triple capsule is as efficacious and well-tolerated as the widely used OAC regimen for H. pylori eradication. This OBMT therapy largely overcomes H. pylori metronidazole resistance, present in 40% of patients in this study.

Is eradication sufficient to heal gastric ulcers in patients infected with Helicobacter pylori? A randomized, controlled, prospective study

BACKGROUND

In Helicobacter pylori infection, the effect of short-term triple therapy with proton pump inhibitor plus two antibiotics on gastric ulcer healing is not well known.

AIM

To compare 1-week triple therapy with 8-week proton pump inhibitor therapy on gastric ulcer healing in infected patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomly assigned 120 patients with H. pylori and gastric ulcers to proton pump inhibitor plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin for 1 week (n = 61) or proton pump inhibitor alone for 8 weeks (n = 59), with endoscopic assessment of ulcer healing 8 weeks after the start of treatment.

RESULTS

Triple therapy eradicated H. pylori in 51 patients [intention-to-treat, 84%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 75-93%]. At 8 weeks, gastric ulcers were healed in 30 patients given triple therapy (49%; 95% CI, 37-62%) and in 49 patients given proton pump inhibitor (83%; 95% CI, 73-93%, P < 0.001). Healing rates in the triple therapy and proton pump inhibitor-only groups were 89% and 100%, respectively, for ulcers of < 1.0 cm in diameter, 54% and 77% for ulcers of 1.0 to < 1.5 cm in diameter, and 5% and 77% (P < 0.001) for ulcers of > or = 1.5 cm in diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

One-week triple therapy healed most ulcers of < 1.0 cm, but not ulcers of > or = 1.5 cm. Short-term therapy is effective for gastric ulcers of < 1.0 cm, but, for larger ulcers, follow-up therapy to suppress acid is needed.

[Surgical treatment of perforated gastric ulcer]

INTRODUCTION

Peptic ulcer perforation is a complication of ulcer disease which requires urgent surgical treatment. The aim of this paper was to point out our experience in surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzes results of surgical treatment in 365 patients with perforated peptic ulcer during the period January 1996 to December 2000.

RESULTS

During the last 5-year period 365 patients were treated following peptic ulcer perforation. The average age was 43.53 +/- 8.26, with the span from 18 to 86. The most frequent surgical procedures in treatment of peptic ulcer perforation were: simple closure with biopsy (55.88%), excision of the ulcer with a pyloroplasty and vagotomy (35.29%) as nonresection surgical procedures and stomach resection after Billroth II (8.83%). The postoperative mortality was 4.41%.

CONCLUSIONS

The methods of choice in surgical treatment of gastric ulcer perforation are nonresection surgical procedures with drug therapy and eradication of Helicobacter pylori, if present.

[Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with peptic ulcer after two treatment failures: a prospective culture-guided study]

AIM

To determine the effectiveness of a third, culture-guided, treatment of H. pylori infection after two unsuccessful attempts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-two consecutive patients with a diagnosis of peptic ulcer were included in an open prospective and multicenter study. After two unsuccessful attempts at eradication (demonstrated by positive urea breath test), all patients underwent endoscopy and H. pylori infection was confirmed by urease test, histology and culture (Pylori-Agar, Bio Merieux, France). Antibiotic susceptibility to metronidazole, amoxicillin, tetracycline and clarithromycin was defined by E-test. Thirty-nine patients received a two-week quadruple culture-guided therapy defined by the protocol, which considered sensitivity data and previous allergies to antibiotics (one culture was contaminated, one patient refused treatment and one was allergic to tetracycline and amoxicillin and was resistant to metronidazole and clarithromycin). Compliance was monitored by pill counting and eradication was defined as a negative urea breath test six weeks after the end of treatment.

RESULTS

Sensitivity data were obtained in 41 patients. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that overall eradication was achieved in 60% (24/40). Eighteen strains (43.9%) were resistant to metronidazole, 21 (51.2%) were resistant to clarithromycin and 8 (19.5%) were resistant to both drugs. None of the strains were resistant to amoxicillin or tetracycline. We used mainly two kinds of quadruple therapy in the 39 patients. Despite good compliance with treatment based on omeprazole (20 mg/12 h), bismuth subcitrate (120 mg/6 h), tetracycline (500 mg/4 h) and clarithromycin (500 mg/ 12 h) (OBTC) eradication was achieved in only 9 of 19 patients (47.4%; CI: 24.4-71.1) (one patient failed to attend the urea breath test). Nineteen clarithromycin-resistant patients received amoxicillin (1,000 mg/12 h) instead of clarithromycin (OBTA) and this treatment was effective in 14 (73.7%; CI: 48.8-90.9). Eradication was achieved in one patient who was allergic to amoxicillin and resistant to clarithromycin and metronidazole and who received ciprofloxacin (500 mg/8 h) instead of clarithromycin (OBTCipro). No clinical factors associated with eradication failure were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the use of two-week, high-dose, quadruple and culture-guided combinations of drugs, a third treatment was frequently unsuccessful. The lowest eradication rate was obtained in patients with H. pylori strains sensitive to all antibiotics; therefore, we believe that other factors could influence eradication rates. New prospective and randomized studies are needed in this subgroup of patients to find effective treatments.

Duodenal ulcer healing with 1-week eradication triple therapy followed, or not, by anti-secretory treatment: a multicentre double-blind placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In the management of Helicobacter pylori induced duodenal ulcer, it is still controversial whether anti-secretory treatment needs to be continued following a 1-week course of eradication therapy.

METHODS

150 patients with H. pylori active duodenal ulcer (diameter > or = 5 mm) were included. After a 1-week eradication treatment combining omeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1000 mg b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (OAC), patients were randomized to omeprazole 20 mg or placebo for 3 additional weeks. The primary variable was ulcer healing assessed at 4 weeks. Eradication was verified 4 weeks after cessation of study drugs by 13C-urea breath test. Intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) included 131 patients with positive histopathology at inclusion.

RESULTS

Healing rates were not statistically different, at 89% and 87%, respectively, in the OAC-omeprazole and OAC-placebo groups (95% CI: -8.7; 13.7). Numerically, healing rates in patients with successful eradication was higher [94/104 (90%)] than in patients with failed eradication [21/27 (78%)]. However, the difference was not statistically significant (P < 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

One-week OAC eradication triple therapy achieves excellent healing rates in patients with uncomplicated duodenal ulcer disease. Although the confidence interval of the difference in healing suggests little or no benefit of continued omeprazole treatment after 1 week, larger studies are needed to address this issue definitively.

Autonomic nervous activity before and after eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with chronic duodenal ulcer

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection is involved in the formation of chronic peptic ulcer. However, a previously reported hypothesis concerning the involvement of central autonomic nervous disorder in this condition cannot be ruled out.

AIM

To use spectrum analysis of heart rate viability to examine autonomic nervous activity before and after H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

Twenty patients with chronic duodenal ulcer (duodenal ulcer group) and 20 age-matched normal adults (N group). In both groups, 24-h Holter electrocardiograms (ECGs) were recorded and spectrum analysis of heartrate variability was performed. In the duodenal ulcer group, Holter ECG was recorded before and after H. pylori eradication.

RESULTS

In the N group, analysis of heart rate variability showed that high frequency (HF) power, an index of parasympathetic activity, was high at night, while the low frequency (LF)/HF ratio, an index of sympathetic function, was high during the daytime. In the duodenal ulcer group, HF power was higher at night than during the daytime, showing a similar pattern to the N group, but the power value was higher than in the N group (P < 0.05). In the duodenal ulcer group, LF/HF at night was significantly higher than that of the N group. In addition, in the duodenal ulcer group, autonomic activity after H. pylori eradication did not differ significantly from that before H. pylori eradication.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with chronic peptic ulcer, both sympatheticotonia and parasympatheticotonia may occur at night, and this abnormality in autonomic nervous activity may cause increased gastric acid secretion and gastric mucosal vasoconstriction. Abnormalities in autonomic activity persist even after H. pylori eradication, suggesting that they may be an independent risk factor in the formation of chronic peptic ulcer in addition to H. pylori infection.

Rescue Therapy for Helicobacter pylori

Up to 35% of patients infected with Helicobacter pylori fail to respond to standard anti-H. pylori therapy. With the rising prevalence antimicrobial resistance, the failure rates of conventional proton pump inhibitor-containing triple therapy are expected to increase. Pretreatment antibiotic resistance testing should be done whenever possible to allow for tailoring of the treatment regimens. The data on second-line or rescue therapy are limited and usually are subjected to various biases and confounding factors. Switching between clarithromycin and metronidazole should be considered if repeated courses of proton pump inhibitor-containing triple therapy are used as second-line therapy in the absence of antimicrobial sensitivity testing. The prolongation of therapy duration with proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin is ineffective for clarithromycin-resistant strains. The bismuth-containing quadruple therapy is the best salvage treatment in the absence of pretreatment antibiotic susceptibility. Furazolidone quadruple therapy (where available) and rifabutin triple therapy are salvage therapies of last resort. If these regimens fail, culture and susceptibility testing is required.

The cost-effectiveness of population Helicobacter pylori screening and treatment: a Markov model using economic data from a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Economic models have suggested that population Helicobacter pylori screening and treatment may be a cost-effective method of reducing mortality from gastric cancer. These models are conservative as they do not consider that the programme may reduce health service peptic ulcer and other dyspepsia costs. We have evaluated the economic impact of population H. pylori screening and treatment over 2 years in a randomized controlled trial and have incorporated the results into an economic model exploring the impact of H. pylori eradication on peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer.

METHODS

Subjects between the ages of 40 and 49 years were randomly invited to attend their local primary care centre. H. pylori status was evaluated by (13)C-urea breath test and infected individuals were randomized to receive omeprazole, 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin, 250 mg b.d., and tinidazole, 500 mg b.d., for 7 days or identical placebos. Economic data on health service costs for dyspepsia were obtained from a primary care note review for the 2 years following randomization. These data were incorporated into a Markov model comparing population H. pylori screening and treatment with no intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 2329 of 8407 subjects were H. pylori positive: 1161 were randomized to receive eradication therapy and 1163 to receive placebo. The cost difference favoured the intervention group 2 years after randomization, but this did not reach statistical significance (11.42 ponds sterling per subject cost saving; 95% confidence interval, 30.04 ponds sterling to -7.19 pounds sterling; P=0.23). Analysis by gender suggested a statistically significant dyspepsia cost saving in men (27.17 ponds sterling per subject; 95% confidence interval, 50.01 pounds sterling to 4.32 pounds sterling; P=0.02), with no benefit in women (-4.46 per subject; 95% confidence interval, -33.85 pounds sterling to 24.93 pounds sterling). Modelling of these data suggested that population H. pylori screening and treatment for 1,000,000 45-year-olds would save over 6,000,000 pounds sterling and 1300 years of life. The programme would cost 14, 200 pounds sterling per life year saved if the health service dyspepsia cost savings were the lower limit of the 95% confidence intervals and H. pylori eradication had only a 10% efficacy in reducing mortality from distal gastric cancer and peptic ulcer disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Modelling suggests that population H. pylori screening and treatment are likely to be cost-effective and could be the first cost-neutral screening programme. This provides a further mandate for clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of population H. pylori screening and treatment in preventing mortality from gastric cancer and peptic ulcer disease.

Sources of variation of Helicobacter pylori treatment success in adults worldwide: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A vast number of Helicobacter pylori treatment trials have been conducted. Regimens may vary in efficacy in different patient populations.

METHODS

We identified sources of treatment effect variation from 618 treatment groups using weighted cross-classified multi-level meta-regression models. Summary effect estimates were calculated within groups that lacked identified heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Overall, treatment was less successful with shorter treatment duration and dual drug (versus triple or quadruple drug) therapies. For nitroimidazole-based regimens, treatment was less successful in populations with frequent childhood H. pylori infection or metronidazole resistance and more successful in northeastern Asia. Non-nitroimidazole treatments of longer duration and those from less recent reports were most successful. Some one-week regimens--(nitroimidazole/ tetracycline/bismuth, ranitidine bismuth citrate/amoxicillin/clarithromycin, and clarithromycin/amoxicillin/proton pump inhibitor) were highly successful in northeastern Asia regardless of metronidazole resistance. The most successful regimen in populations with both a high prevalence of metrondiazole resistance and frequent infection in children (metronidazole/furazolidone/amoxicillin) eliminated fewer than 70% of infections.

CONCLUSIONS

More effective treatments are needed for most populations of the world where H. pylori infection in children and drug resistance are common. Current treatment guidelines do not coincide with the best treatment regimens identified in this meta-analysis.