Translocation (8;12;21)(q22.1;q24.1;q22.1): a new masked type of t(8;21)(q22;q22) in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia

Fusion Gene-Based Classification of Variant Cytogenetic Rearrangements in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represents a heterogeneous disease entity that is continuously moving to a more genetically defined classification. The classification of AML with recurrent chromosomal translocations, including those involving core binding factor subunits, plays a critical role in diagnosis, prognosis, treatment stratification, and residual disease evaluation. Accurate classification of variant cytogenetic rearrangements in AML contributes to effective clinical management. We report here the identification of four variant t(8;V;21) translocations in newly diagnosed AML patients. Two patients showed a t(8;14) and a t(8;10) variation, respectively, with a morphologically normal-appearing chromosome 21 in each initial karyotype. Subsequent fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on metaphase cells revealed cryptic three-way translocations t(8;14;21) and t(8;10;21). Each resulted in RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion. The other two patients showed karyotypically visible three-way translocations t(8;16;21) and t(8;20;21), respectively. Each resulted in RUNX1::RUNX1T1 fusion. Our findings demonstrate the importance of recognizing variant forms of t(8;21) translocations and emphasize the value of applying RUNX1::RUNX1T1 FISH for the detection of cryptic and complex rearrangements when abnormalities involving chromosome band 8q22 are observed in patients with AML.

Identification of a Cryptic t(8;20;21)(q22;p13;q22) Resulting in RUNX1T1/RUNX1 Fusion in a Patient with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The detection of recurrent genetic abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), including RUNX1T1/RUNX1 gene fusion, is critical for optimal medical management. Herein, we report a 45 year old woman with newly diagnosed AML and conventional chromosome studies that revealed an apparently balanced t(8;20)(q22;p13) in all 20 metaphases analyzed. A RUNX1T1/RUNX1 dual-color dual-fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probe set was subsequently performed and revealed a RUNX1T1/RUNX1 gene fusion. Metaphase FISH studies performed on abnormal metaphases revealed a cryptic, complex translocation resulting in RUNX1T1/RUNX1 fusion, t(8;20;21)(q22;p13;q22). This case study shows the importance of performing FISH studies or other high-resolution genetic testing concurrently with conventional chromosome studies for the detection of cryptic recurrent gene fusions in AML, particularly a focused genetic evaluation such as RUNX1T1/RUNX1 gene fusion, when specific abnormalities involving 8q22 are identified.

[A Case of Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Masked t(8;21).]

We report a case that revealed the characteristics of acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation (AML-M2) on the morphology of the bone marrow biopsy and 45,X,-Y in conventional cytogenetic study, but was confirmed to have a typical AML1/ETO translocation by molecular studies using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Insertion of ETO gene on chromosome 8 into chromosome 21 in this patient resulted in the development of the chimeric gene, AML1/ETO, on the long arm of chromosome 21. Our final report on the patient's karyotype: 45,X,-Y.ish ins(21;8)(q22;q22q22)(AML1 +,ETO +;ETO +,AML1-). In case typical morphologic features compatible with recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities are shown, molecular studies in addition to conventional cytogenetic study might be required to confirm the diagnosis.

RUNX1 translocations and fusion genes in malignant hemopathies

The RUNX1 gene, located in chromosome 21q22, is crucial for the establishment of definitive hematopoiesis and the generation of hematopoietic stem cells in the embryo. It contains a 'Runt homology domain' as well as transcription activation and inhibition domains. RUNX1 can act as activator or repressor of target gene expression depending upon the large number of transcription factors, coactivators and corepressors that interact with it. Translocations involving chromosomal band 21q22 are regularly identified in leukemia patients. Most of them are associated with a rearrangement of RUNX1. Indeed, at present, 55 partner chromosomal bands have been described but the partner gene has solely been identified in 21 translocations at the molecular level. All the translocations that retain Runt homology domains but remove the transcription activation domain have a leukemogenic effect by acting as dominant negative inhibitors of wild-type RUNX1 in transcription activation.

A variant t(8;10;21) in a patient with pathological features mimicking atypical chronic myeloid leukemia

We report the case of an 11-year-old girl who was initially diagnosed with a chronic myeloproliferative disorder, possibly chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), based on laboratory and blood and marrow morphological findings. The patient's high leukocyte count did not respond to hydroxyurea, a standard initial therapy for CML. Chromosomal analysis revealed that the patient did not have t(9;22), but a complex t(8;10;21)(q22;q24;q22), a variant of t(8;21). The treatment regime was switched to an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) protocol; the patient responded well and is now in remission. This case demonstrates again that routine clinical cytogenetic analysis plays an important role in the clinical diagnosis, guidance of treatment, and prognostication in hematological disorders.

Insertion (21;8)(q22;q22q22): a masked t(8;21) in a patient with acute myelocytic leukemia

A 43-year-old man was diagnosed with acute myelocytic leukemia with cellular maturation (AML-M2, according to the French-American-British classification criteria). A cytogenetic study with a G-banding method initially reported the karyotype as 45,X,-Y; however, dual-color, dual-fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with probes for the AML1 and the ETO genes showed an unusual pattern of signals, presenting one fusion signal on chromosome 21. Molecular study by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction revealed the presence of a typical AML1/ETO chimeric gene. FISH with whole-chromosome painting probes targeting chromosomes 8 and 21 revealed insertion of part of 8 chromosome into the long arm of chromosome 21. We concluded that complicated translocations involving chromosomes 8 and 21 in this patient resulted in the development of the chimeric gene, AML1/ETO, on the long arm of chromosome 21. This aberrant location of AML1/ETO gene and the final karyotype of 45,X,-Y,ins(21;8)(q22;q22q22) could not be determined without molecular analysis. This abnormality is considered a masked t(8;21).

Cryptic chromosomal aberrations leading to an AML1/ETO rearrangement are frequently caused by small insertions

The translocation t(8;21)(q22;q22), which results in the fusion of the AML1 (RUNX1) and ETO (CBFA2T1) genes, is a recurrent aberration in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), preferentially correlated with FAB M2, and has the highest incidence in childhood AML. Because of the favorable prognosis, the evidence of the t(8;21) or the AML1/ETO fusion gene is mandatory in most of the therapy trials, allowing the stratification of the patients to the correct risk group in terms of treatment. Here we present six out of 59 children with AML who were positive for AML1/ETO by RT-PCR, but showed no evidence of the classical t(8;21)(q22;q22) by conventional cytogenetics. Because of the discrepancies between molecular and cytogenetic analyses, these six patients were further investigated by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. Small hidden interstitial insertions resulting in an AML1/ETO rearrangement were detected in five (8.5%) of the 59 patients, whereas the sixth patient showed a cryptic three-way translocation. The insertions could be characterized as ins(21;8) in three patients and ins(8;21) in the remaining two. Additionally, three of the patients showed secondary chromosome aberrations leading to a higher complexity of the karyotype. In conclusion, the combination of more than one standard technique in the analysis of AML1/ETO is useful to reveal the overall frequency of cryptic chromosome rearrangements and permits a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the generation of this fusion gene.

Acute myeloid leukemia (FAB-M2) with a masked type of t(8;21) translocation revealed by spectral karyotyping

We report a case of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), M2 subtype according to the French-American-British (FAB) classification, with extramedullary myeloblastoma of the uterus and a masked type of variant translocation of t(8;21)(q22;q22). A 45-year-old Japanese woman presented with metrorrhagia, and AML (M2) with uterine invasion was diagnosed. The patient received an allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation after remission, and her pelvis was irradiated locally. Cytogenetic study at first showed t(8;17)(q22;p13) by G-banding. Spectral karyotyping (SKY) analysis modified this interpretation to a 3-way translocation involving chromosomes 8,17, and 21 and identified a masked type of variant t(8;21)(q22;q22) translocation. Results of fluorescence in situ hybridization using the AML1/ETO probe, and of detection of the AML1/ETO fusion transcript by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction were consistent with the karyotyping result. SKY analysis is useful to compensate for the limitations of cytogenetic studies.

Identification of ins(8;21) with AML1/ETO fusion in acute myelogenous leukemia M2 by molecular cytogenetics

A high percentage of cases of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) of the M2 subtype show a rearrangement between the AML1 and ETO genes. The detection of the AML1/ETO fusion has clinical relevance because patients with this subtype have a good prognosis. We present the results of conventional and molecular cytogenetic studies in a patient with acute myelogenous leukemia French-American-British M2 classification, who had a complex karyotype involving chromosomes 8 and 21. Dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using the AML1/ETO probe demonstrated a recombination of both genes on an add(8) chromosome. The use of other FISH probes (CEP8, c-myc and TEL21) and spectral karyotyping indicated that AML1/ETO fusion occurred as a consequence of a previously undescribed ins(8;21)(q22;q22.1q22.3).

t(8;21;14)(q22;q22;q24) is a novel variant of t(8;21) with chimeric transcripts of AML1-ETO in acute myelogenous leukemia

We report a male patient with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML; French-American-British M2) associated with AML1-ETO. Cytogenetic studies showed a complex karyotype including a novel translocation (8;21;14)(q22;q22;q24) in all analyzed cells. This three-way translocation was confirmed with spectral karyotyping. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis for AML1-ETO chimeric transcripts showed the presence of the fusion product with the expected size. Translocation (8;21;14)(q22;q22;q24) is a novel variant of t(8;21)(q22;q22), possibly having a common molecular pathogenetic mechanism.

Comparison of cytogenetic and molecular genetic detection of t(8;21) and inv(16) in a prospective series of adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare cytogenetics and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of t(8;21)(q22;q22) and inv(16)(p13q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22), aberrations characteristic of core-binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), in 284 adults newly diagnosed with primary AML.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cytogenetic analyses were performed at local laboratories, with results reviewed centrally. RT-PCR for AML1/ETO and CBFbeta/MYH11 was performed centrally.

RESULTS

CBF AML was ultimately identified in 48 patients: 21 had t(8;21) or its variant and AML1/ETO, and 27 had inv(16)/t(16;16), CBFbeta/MYH11, or both. Initial cytogenetic and RT-PCR analyses correctly classified 95.7% and 96.1% of patients, respectively (P =.83). Initial cytogenetic results were considered to be false-negative in three AML1/ETO-positive patients with unique variants of t(8;21), and in three CBFbeta/MYH11-positive patients with, respectively, an isolated +22; del(16)(q22),+22; and a normal karyotype. The latter three patients were later confirmed to have inv(16)/t(16;16) cytogenetically. Only one of 124 patients reported initially as cytogenetically normal was ultimately RT-PCR-positive. There was no false-positive cytogenetic result. Initial RT-PCR was falsely negative in two patients with inv(16) and falsely positive for AML1/ETO in two and for CBFbeta/MYH11 in another two patients. Two patients with del(16)(q22) were found to be CBFbeta/MYH11-negative. M4Eo marrow morphology was a good predictor of the presence of inv(16)/t(16;16).

CONCLUSION

Patients with t(8;21) or inv(16) can be successfully identified in prospective multi-institutional clinical trials. Both cytogenetics and RT-PCR detect most such patients, although each method has limitations. RT-PCR is required when the cytogenetic study fails; it is also required to determine whether patients with suspected variants of t(8;21), del(16)(q22), or +22 represent CBF AML. RT-PCR should not replace cytogenetics and should not be used as the only diagnostic test for detection of CBF AML because of the possibility of obtaining false-positive or false-negative results.

Cytogenetically cryptic AML1-ETO and CBF beta-MYH11 gene rearrangements: incidence in 412 cases of acute myeloid leukaemia

The rearrangements t(8;21)(q22;22) and inv(16)(p13q22) are two of the most frequently seen in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), accounting for 8% and 4% of cases respectively. Detection of these abnormalities is important for disease management as both are associated with good responses to conventional chemotherapy and prolonged disease-free survival. Recent reports using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) suggest that significant proportions of AML cases without a visible t(8;21) or inv(16) show expression of an abnormal fusion gene transcript and, consequently, they could not be detected using conventional cytogenetic analysis alone. We present here a four centre study involving 412 cases of AML screened using both standard cytogenetics and RT-PCR for AML1-ETO and CBF beta-MYH11. We detected a cytogenetic t(8;21) in 31 out of 412 (7.5%) cases and an inv(16) or t(16;16) variant in 27 out of 412 (6.6%) cases. RT-PCR detected only two cases (0.5%) of cryptic t(8;21) and no instances of cryptic inv(16). Both cryptic t(8;21) cases had the classic M2 FAB morphology for this type of disease. Our data concur with the established FAB type distribution of the rearrangements and indicate that cryptic t(8;21) and inv(16) may be much less frequent than reported elsewhere.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of masked (8;21)(q22;q22) translocations

The translocation (8;21)(q22;q22) is associated with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML M2). The accurate detection of this chromosomal rearrangement is vital due to its association with a favorable prognosis. Variant translocations exist; these may be hidden within an unusual or complex karyotype. In such cases, it is often difficult to confirm the presence of t(8;21)(q22;q22) by conventional cytogenetic analysis alone. The molecular detection of the AML1/ETO fusion gene is possible by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using probes specific for AML1 and ETO. Four cases of AML M2, with unusual or complex structural chromosomal abnormalities, without cytogenetic evidence of the classical t(8;21)(q22;q22), were studied by FISH. Two were AML1/ETO positive by RT-PCR, one showed a rearrangement by AML1 by Southern analysis, and the fourth had morphological features characteristic of t(8;21). The FISH results showed a co-localization of one AML1 and one ETO signal in interphase and metaphase nuclei in all four cases, demonstrating the presence of variant t(8;21)(q22;q22) rearrangements. Therefore, FISH analysis with the AML1 and ETO probes is extremely valuable, in cases of AML M2, because of its ability to reveal masked t(8;21)(q22;q22) translocations and thus quickly confirm the diagnosis, allowing patients to be assigned to the correct risk group in terms of treatment.