Combined treatment with temporary short-term high dose rate iridium-192 brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy for irradiation of localized prostatic carcinoma

Long-Term Results of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0321: A Phase II Trial of Combined High Dose Rate Brachytherapy and External Beam Radiation Therapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate

PURPOSE

To report the long-term outcome of patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy from a prospective multi-institutional trial conducted by NRG Oncology/RTOG.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with clinically localized (T1c-T3b) prostate cancer without prior history of transurethral resection of prostate or hip prosthesis were eligible for this study. All patients were treated with a combination of 45 Gy in 25 fractions from external beam radiation therapy and one HDR implant delivering 19 Gy in 2 fractions. Adverse events (AE) were collected using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3. Cumulative incidence was used to estimate time to severe late gastrointestinal (GI)/genitourinary (GU) toxicity, biochemical failure, disease-specific mortality, local failure, and distant failure. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-nine patients were enrolled from July 2004 to May 2006. AE data was available for 115 patients. Patients were National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) intermediate to very high risk. The median age was 68, T1c-T2c 91%, T3a-T3b 9%, PSA ≤10 70%, PSA >10 to ≤20 30%, GS 6 10%, GS 7 72%, and GS 8 to 10 18%. Forty-three percent of patients received hormonal therapy. At a median follow-up time of 10 years, there were 6 (5%) patients with grade 3 GI and GU treatment-related AEs, and no late grade 4 to 5 GI and GU AEs. At 5 and 10 years, the rate of late grade 3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary AEs was 4% and 5%, respectively. Five- and 10-year overall survival rates were 95% and 76%. Biochemical failure rates per Phoenix definition at 5 and 10 years were 14% and 23%. The 10-year rate of disease-specific mortality was 6%. At 5 and 10 years, the rates of distant failure were 4% and 8%, respectively. The rates of local failure at 5 and 10 years were 2% at both time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined modality treatment using HDR prostate brachytherapy leads to excellent long-term clinical outcomes in this prospective multi-institutional trial.

An audit of high dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment planning at six Swedish clinics

Purpose

High dose-rate prostate brachytherapy has been implemented in Sweden in the late 1980s and early 1990s in six clinics using the same schedule: 20 Gy in two fractions combined with 50 Gy in 25 fractions with external beam radiation therapy. Thirty years have passed and during these years, various aspects of the treatment process have developed, such as ultrasound-guided imaging and treatment planning system. An audit was conducted, including a questionnaire and treatment planning, which aimed to gather knowledge about treatment planning methods in Swedish clinics.

Material and methods

A questionnaire and a treatment planning case (non-anatomical images) were sent to six Swedish clinics, in which high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy is performed. Treatment plans were compared using dosimetric indices and equivalent 2 Gy doses (EQD₂). Treatment planning system report was used to compare dwell positions and dwell times.

Results

For all the clinics, the planning aim for the target was 10.0 Gy, but the volume to receive the dose differed from 95% to 100%. Dose constraints for organs at risk varied with up to 2 Gy. The dose to 90% of target volume ranged from 10.0 Gy to 11.1 Gy, equivalent to 26.0 Gy EQD₂ and 31.3 Gy EQD₂, respectively. Dose non-homogeneity ratio differed from 0.18 to 0.32 for clinical target volume (CTV) in treatment plans and conformity index ranged from 0.52 to 0.59 for CTV.

Conclusions

Dose constraints for the organs at risk are showing a larger variation than that reflected in compared treatments plans. In all treatment plans in our audit, at least 10 Gy was administered giving a total treatment of 102 Gy EQD₂, which is in the upper part of the prescription doses published in the GEC/ESTRO recommendations.

A Brief Review of Low-Dose Rate (LDR) and High-Dose Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy Boost for High-Risk Prostate

For patients with unfavorable or high-risk prostate cancer, dose escalated radiation therapy leads to improved progression free survival but attempts to deliver increased dose by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone can be limited by late toxicities to nearby genitourinary and gastrointestinal organs at risk. Brachytherapy is a method to deliver dose escalation in conjunction with EBRT with a potentially improved late toxicity profile and improved prostate cancer related outcomes. At least three randomized controlled trials have demonstrated improved biochemical control with the addition of either low-dose rate (LDR) or high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy to EBRT, although only ASCENDE-RT compared brachytherapy to dose-escalated EBRT but did report an over 50% improvement in biochemical failure with a LDR boost. Multiple single institution and comparative research series also support the use of a brachytherapy boost in the DE-EBRT era and demonstrate excellent prostate cancer specific outcomes. Despite improved oncologic outcomes with a brachytherapy boost in the high-risk setting, the utilization of both LDR, and HDR brachytherapy use is declining. The acute genitourinary toxicities when brachytherapy boost is combined with EBRT, particularly a LDR boost, are of concern in comparison to EBRT alone. HDR brachytherapy boost has many physical properties inherent to its rapid delivery of a large dose which may reduce acute toxicities and also appeal to the radiobiology of prostate cancer. We herein review the evidence for use of either LDR or HDR brachytherapy boost for high-risk prostate cancer and summarize comparisons between the two treatment modalities.

Phase I study of dose escalation to dominant intraprostatic lesions using high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Purpose

Radiation dose escalation for prostate cancer improves biochemical control but is limited by toxicity. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) can define dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIL). This phase I study evaluated dose escalation to MRSI-defined DIL using high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy.

Material and methods

Enrollment was closed early due to low accrual. Ten patients with prostate cancer (T2a-3b, Gleason 6-9, PSA < 20) underwent pre-treatment MRSI, and eight patients had one to three DIL identified. The eight enrolled patients received external beam radiation therapy to 45 Gy and HDR brachytherapy boost to the prostate of 19 Gy in 2 fractions. MRSI images were registered to planning CT images and DIL dose-escalated up to 150% of prescription dose while maintaining normal tissue constraints. The primary endpoint was genitourinary (GU) toxicity.

Results

The median total DIL volume was 1.31 ml (range, 0.67-6.33 ml). Median DIL boost was 130% of prescription dose (range, 110-150%). Median urethra V₁₂₀ was 0.15 ml (range, 0-0.4 ml) and median rectum V₇₅ was 0.74 ml (range, 0.1-1.0 ml). Three patients had acute grade 2 GU toxicity, and two patients had late grade 2 GU toxicity. No patients had grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal toxicity, and no grade 3 or higher toxicities were noted. There were no biochemical failures with median follow-up of 4.9 years (range, 2-8.5 years).

Conclusions

Dose escalation to MRSI-defined DIL is feasible. Toxicity was low but incompletely assessed due to limited patients’ enrollment.

Inverse planning and inverse implanting for breast interstitial brachytherapy. Introducing a new anatomy specific breast interstitial template (ASBIT)

An innovative template, based on thoracic cage surface reconstructions for breast interstitial brachytherapy was developed. Hybrid-inverse-planning-optimisation-based implantations and brachytherapy plans, using three custom anthropomorphic breast phantoms, were utilised for its validation. A user independent, inverse planning and inverse implanting technique is proposed.

The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer

Brachytherapy (BT), using low-dose-rate (LDR) permanent seed implantation or high-dose-rate (HDR) temporary source implantation, is an acceptable treatment option for select patients with prostate cancer of any risk group. The benefits of HDR-BT over LDR-BT include the ability to use the same source for other cancers, lower operator dependence, and - typically - fewer acute irritative symptoms. By contrast, the benefits of LDR-BT include more favourable scheduling logistics, lower initial capital equipment costs, no need for a shielded room, completion in a single implant, and more robust data from clinical trials. Prospective reports comparing HDR-BT and LDR-BT to each other or to other treatment options (such as external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or surgery) suggest similar outcomes. The 5-year freedom from biochemical failure rates for patients with low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk disease are >85%, 69-97%, and 63-80%, respectively. Brachytherapy with EBRT (versus brachytherapy alone) is an appropriate approach in select patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk disease. The 10-year rates of overall survival, distant metastasis, and cancer-specific mortality are >85%, <10%, and <5%, respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities associated with HDR-BT and LDR-BT are rare, at <4% in most series, and quality of life is improved in patients who receive brachytherapy compared with those who undergo surgery.

Brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer: Trends in care and survival outcomes

PURPOSE

Androgen suppression combined with elective nodal and dose-escalated radiation therapy recently demonstrated an improved biochemical failure-free survival in men who received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus a brachytherapy boost (BB) compared with dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (DE-EBRT). We sought to analyze the factors predictive for use of EBRT + BB as compared with DE-EBRT and report resulting survival outcomes on a national level using a hospital-based registry.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We identified 113,719 men from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2013 with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer who were treated with EBRT + BB or DE-EBRT. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses of all available factors potentially predictive of receipt of treatment selection. Survival was evaluated in a multivariable model with propensity adjustment.

RESULTS

For intermediate-risk patients, utilization of BB decreased from 33.1% (n = 1742) in 2004 to 12.5% (n = 766) in 2013 and for high-risk patients, utilization dropped from 27.6% (n = 879) to 10.8% (n = 479). Numerous factors predictive for use of BB were identified. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed-adjusting for age, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, T stage, prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, and sociodemographic factors-and demonstrated BB use was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.75; p < 0.0005) and 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.78; p < 0.0005) for intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a concerning decline in the utilization of BB for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients despite an association with improved on overall survival. Numerous factors predictive for use of BB have been identified.

The impact of activating source dwell positions outside the CTV on the dose to treated normal tissue volumes in TRUS guided 3D conformal interstitial HDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer

Purpose

Dose coverage is crucial for successful treatment in mono-brachytherapy. Since few and very high dose fractions are used, there is an important balance between dwell positioning outside the clinical target volume (CTV) and possible damage on adjacent normal tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the possibility of having dwell positions close to the CTV surface, while maintaining an acceptable dose distribution, and to investigate the robustness in terms of known geometrical uncertainties of the implant.

Material and methods

This study included 37 patients who had received brachytherapy for prostate cancer as a monotherapy with the following schedules: 2 × 14 Gy or 3 × 11 Gy, each fraction separated by two weeks. The source dwell positions were activated 5 mm outside CTV. New optimizations were simulated for dwell positions at 3, 2, 1, and 0 mm. Inverse and graphical optimization were applied according to the relative dose constraints: V_{100 CTV} ≥ 97%, D_{max, urethra} ≤ 110%, and D_{10 rectal mucosa} ≤ 65%. The V_{100, normal tissue} outside CTV was used to evaluate dose variations caused by different dwell positions. Prostate geometries and dose distributions for the different dwell positions outside the CTV were used to investigate the impact on the CTV dose distribution due to geometrical uncertainties.

Results

Both V_{100, CTV}, and V_{100, normal tissue} decreased, 98.6% to 92.2%, and 17 cm³ to 9.0 cm³, for dwell activation from 5 mm to 0 mm. The evaluation of both simulated longitudinal geometrical uncertainties and different source dwell activations implied that V_{100, CTV} ranged from 98.6% to 86.3%.

Conclusions

It is possible to reduce the V_{100, normal tissue} by decreasing the source dwell positions outside the CTV from 5 to 3 mm, while maintaining dose constraints. In combination with the estimated geometrical uncertainties, however, the source dwell positions need to be 5 mm from the surface in order to maintain a robust implant.

Combining theoretical potential and advanced technology in high-dose rate brachytherapy boost therapy for prostate cancer

External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with brachytherapy (BT) is an attractive treatment option for select patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Either low- or high-dose rate BT may be combined with EBRT ('LDR-BT boost,' 'HDR-BT boost,' respectively). HDR-BT boost has potential theoretical benefits over LDR-BT boost or external beam radiation therapy monotherapy in terms of radiobiology, radiophysics and patient convenience. Based on prospective studies in this review, freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) rates at 5 years for low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients have generally been 85-100%, 68-97%, 63-85%, respectively; late Radiotherapy and Oncology Group Grades 3 and 4 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities are seen in <8% of patients. HDR-BT boost is now a relatively well-established treatment modality for certain intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer patients, though limitations exist in drawing conclusions from the currently published studies.

Future directions from past experience: a century of prostate radiotherapy

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed noncutaneous malignancy in men, yet 100 years ago it was considered a rare disease. Over the past century, radiation therapy has evolved from a radium source placed in the urethra to today's advanced proton therapy delivered by only a few specialized centers. As techniques in radiation have evolved, the treatment of localized prostate cancer has become one of the most debated topics in oncology. Today, patients with prostate cancer must often make a difficult decision between multiple treatment modalities, each with the risk of permanent sequelae, without robust randomized data to compare every treatment option. Meanwhile, opinions of urologists and radiation oncologists about the risks and benefits involved with each modality vary widely. Further complicating the issue is rapidly advancing technology which often outpaces clinical data. This article represents a complete description of the evolution of prostate cancer radiation therapy with the goal of illuminating the historical basis for current challenges facing oncologists and their patients.

High dose rate prostate brachytherapy: an overview of the rationale, experience and emerging applications in the treatment of prostate cancer

The technological advances in real-time ultrasound image guidance for high dose rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy places this treatment modality at the forefront of innovation in radiotherapy. This review article will explore the rationale for HDR brachytherapy as a highly conformal method of dose delivery and safe dose escalation to the prostate, in addition to the particular radiobiological advantages it has over low dose rate and external beam radiotherapy. The encouraging outcome data and favourable toxicity profile will be discussed before looking at emerging applications for the future and how this procedure will feature alongside stereotactic radiosurgery.

Phase II trial of combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate: preliminary results of RTOG 0321

PURPOSE

To estimate the rate of late Grade 3 or greater genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) after treatment with external beam radiotherapy and prostate high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Each participating institution submitted computed tomography-based HDR brachytherapy dosimetry data electronically for credentialing and for each study patient. Patients with locally confined Stage T1c-T3b prostate cancer were eligible for the present study. All patients were treated with 45 Gy in 25 fractions using external beam radiotherapy and one HDR implant delivering 19 Gy in two fractions. All AEs were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. Late GU/GI AEs were defined as those occurring >9 months from the start of the protocol treatment, in patients with ≥18 months of potential follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients from 14 institutions were enrolled in the present study. Of the 129 patients, 125 were eligible, and AE data were available for 112 patients at analysis. The pretreatment characteristics of the patients were as follows: Stage T1c-T2c, 91%; Stage T3a-T3b, 9%; prostate-specific antigen level ≤10 ng/mL, 70%; prostate-specific antigen level >10 but ≤20 ng/mL, 30%; and Gleason score 2-6, 10%; Gleason score 7, 72%; and Gleason score 8-10, 18%. At a median follow-up of 29.6 months, three acute and four late Grade 3 GU/GI AEs were reported. The estimated rate of late Grade 3-5 GU and GI AEs at 18 months was 2.56%.

CONCLUSION

This is the first prospective, multi-institutional trial of computed tomography-based HDR brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy. The technique and doses used in the present study resulted in acceptable levels of AEs.

Combined curative radiotherapy including HDR brachytherapy and androgen deprivation in localized prostate cancer: a prospective assessment of acute and late treatment toxicity

Self-reported symptoms including urinary, bowel and sexual side effects were investigated prospectively at multiple assessment points before and after combined radiotherapy of prostate cancer including HDR brachytherapy and neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Between April 2000 and June 2003, patients with predominantly advanced localized prostate tumours subjected to this treatment were asked before treatment and on follow-up visits to complete a questionnaire covering urinary, bowel and sexual problems. The mainly descriptive analyses included 525 patients, responding to at least one questionnaire before or during the period 2-34 months after radiotherapy. Adding androgen deprivation before radiotherapy significantly worsened sexual function. During radiotherapy, urinary, bowel and sexual problems increased and were reported at higher levels up to 34 months, although there seemed to be a general tendency to less pronounced irritative bowel and urinary tract symptoms over time. No side effects requiring surgery were reported. Classic late irradiation effects such as mucosal bleeding were demonstrated mainly during the second year after therapy, but appear less pronounced in comparison with dose escalated EBRT series. In conclusion, despite the high radiation dose given, the toxicity seemed comparable with that of other series but long term (5-10 years) symptom outcome has to be determined.

High-dose-rate intensity modulated brachytherapy with external-beam radiotherapy improves local and biochemical control in patients with high-risk prostate cancer

Purpose Our aim was to report the 8-year outcome of local dose escalation using high-dose-rate conformal brachytherapy combined with external irradiation for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Material and methods From June 1998 to June 2007, 134 patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled in the study. The median follow-up was 45 months (12-107). Only patients considered as having high-risk criteria were accepted [prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > or =20 ng/ml and/or Gleason >7 and/or stage > or =T3a or two intermediate-risk criteria: PSA 11-19 ng/ml, Gleason 7, stage T2b-c]. The total dose applied by external beam radiotherapy was 46 Gy in 200-cGy daily fractions. High-dose-rate brachytherapy was performed at the end of weeks 1 and 3 of the 5-week radiotherapy course. The doses administered in each application was 1,150 cGy. Any patient free of clinical or biochemical evidence of disease was termed b-NED. Actuarial rates of outcome were calculated by Kaplan. Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test. Cox regression models were used to establish prognostic factors of the measures of outcome. Results Mean follow-up for the entire group was 45 months (range 12-107). The overall survival (OS) according to Kaplan-Meier estimates was 85% (+/-5) at 5 and 8 years. The 5 and 8 years for biochemical control were 80% (+/-4%) and 73% (+/-7%), respectively, whereas for failure in tumor-free survival (TFS), they were 82% (+/-3) at 5 and 8 years, respectively. The 8-year cause-specific mortality was 10% (+/-4%). The multivariate Cox regression analyses identified the number of poor prognostic factors as independent for biochemical failure. Our report includes only patients considered as high risk, and the 8-year b-NED survival rate was 83% for patients with two intermediate-risk criteria, 78% for patients with one poor prognostic factor, 56% for two and 35% for all three (p = 0.001). There were no urethral strictures and/or urinary incontinence. Gastrointestinal toxicity grade 2 was 7.5%. Conclusions The 8-year results confirm the feasibility and effectiveness of external-beam radiation therapy with conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for patients with high-risk tumor. The late toxicity rates were low, corroborating the excellent dose conformity.

Clinical outcome in patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy and high dose-rate iridium 192 brachytherapy boost: a 6-year follow-up

To report the long-term results for treatment of localized carcinoma of the prostate using high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, conformal external beam radiotherapy (3D EBRT) and neo-adjuvant hormonal therapy (TAB). From 1998 through 1999, 154 patients with localized prostate cancer were entered in the trial. Biologically no evidence of disease (bNED) was defined at PSA levels < 2 microg/l. In order to compare the results of this treatment with other treatment modalities, the patient's pre-treatment data were used to calculate the estimated 5-year PSA relapse free survival using Kattan's nomograms for radical prostatectomy (RP) and 3D EBRT. After 6 years of follow-up, 129 patients remain alive. The actual 5-year relapse-free survival is 84%. None of the patients demonstrated clinical signs of local recurrence. The median PSA at follow-up among the relapse-free patients was 0.05 microg/l. Among the 80 patients who presented with clinical stage T3 tumours, 55 (68%) were relapse-free. The expected 5-year relapse-free survival using nomograms for RP and 3D EBRT was 54% and 70%, respectively. Late rectal toxicity RTOG grade 3 occurred in 1% of the patients. Late urinary tract toxicity RTOG grade 3 developed in 4% of the patients. Combined treatment, utilizing HDR, 3D EBRT and TAB, produces good clinical results. Rectal toxicity is acceptable. Urinary tract toxicity, most likely can be explained by the fact that during the first years of this treatment, no effort was made to localize the urethra, which was assumed to be in the middle of the prostate.

Is the α/β Value for Prostate Tumours Low Enough to be Safely Used in Clinical Trials?

There has been an intense debate over the past several years on the relevant alpha/beta value that could be used to describe the fractionation response of prostate tumours. Previously it has been assumed that prostate tumours have high alpha/beta values, similar to most other tumours and the early reacting normal tissues. However, the proliferation behaviour of the prostate tumours is more like that of the late reacting tissues, with slow doubling times and low alpha/beta values. The analyses of clinical results carried out in the past few years have indeed suggested that the alpha/beta value that characterises the fractionation response of the prostate is low, possibly even below the 3 Gy commonly assumed for most late complications, and hence that hypofractionation of the radiation treatment might improve the therapeutic ratio (better control at the same or lower complication rate). However, hypofractionation might also increase the complication rates in the surrounding late responding tissues and if their alpha/beta value is not larger that of prostate tumours it could even lead to a decrease in the therapeutic ratio. Therefore, the important question is whether the alpha/beta value for the prostate is lower than the alpha/beta values of the surrounding late responding tissues at risk. This paper reviews the clinical and experimental data regarding the radiobiological differential that might exist between prostate tumours and the late normal tissues around them. Several prospective hypofractionated trials that have been initiated recently in order to determine the alpha/beta value or the range of values that describe the fractionation response of prostate tumours are also reviewed. In spite of several confounding factors that interfere with the derivation of a precise value, it seems that most data support a trend towards lower alpha/beta values for prostate tumours than for rectum or bladder.

Radiation therapy in prostate cancer

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers of men in the Western hemisphere and is second only to lung cancer for male cancer mortality. Most patients are diagnosed in the early/clinically localized stage, which can be treated curatively with radiation therapy alone. Innovative methods such as brachytherapy, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), and IMRT (intensity modulated radiotherapy) are able to deliver very high tumoricidal doses to the diseased prostate, with minimal side effects to the surrounding tissue. Radiation therapy combined with hormonal treatment can be curative in locally advanced disease. Radiation therapy is also very effective in alleviating symptoms of metastatic prostate cancer (bone metastases, spinal cord compression, and bladder outlet obstruction).

Dosimetry of anal radiation in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to determine the radiation dose to the anus during brachytherapy using high-dose-rate Ir-192 sources.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thermoluminescence dosimeters were used for measuring the dose to the distal part of the anus in 10 patients, and in a prostate phantom to measure the radiation dose during the transport of the radiation source.

RESULTS

The measured dose to the anus in vivo was on average 0.85 Gy (range, 0.48-1.37 Gy) per treatment. The transport dose using 15 and 19 needles in the prostate phantom was 0.07 and 0.08 Gy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The dose delivered to the anus using high-dose-rate brachytherapy with Ir-192 sources is quite low. There is a contribution to the anal radiation dose during the transport of the Ir-192 source into the needles. However, in clinical practice when using 15-20 needles, the dose from transporting the Ir-192 source can be ignored.

Prostate displacement kit: reducing the radiation dose to the rectum

During high dose-rate brachytherapy boost in 20 patients the use of a prostate-water-rectal-displacement-kit contributed to an increase in the distance between the prostate and the rectum, however, the prostate was not totally immobilized by the needles, implying the necessity for an very careful on-line dose-planning dosimetry.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy without external beam irradiation for locally advanced prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) had been used only in combination with external beam irradiation (EBI) until our previously reported first trial of HDR-BT alone without EBI. The purpose of the current report is to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of this regimen, with more patient accrual and longer follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 1995 through 2004, 111 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with HDR-BT without EBI. Fifteen patients were considered as low-risk, 28 as intermediate-risk, and 68 as high-risk. The prescribed dose was 48 Gy/8 fractions/5 days or 54 Gy/9 fractions/5 days. Median follow-up time was 27 months (range 5-119).

RESULTS

All the patients completed the treatment regimen. The 3- and 5-year PSA failure-free rates were 83% and 70%, and the local control rates 100% and 97%. The maximum toxicities observed were Grade 3 by CTCAE v3.0 (6 acute, 1 chronic).

CONCLUSIONS

HDR-BT without EBI was feasible and its toxicity acceptable. Short-term tumor control was promising, even for locally advanced cases. More patient accrual and longer follow-up are needed to confirm the efficacy of this novel approach.

Dose-volume impact in high-dose-rate Iridium-192 brachytherapy as a boost to external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer- a phase II study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Evaluation of dose-volume-time-related factors in 64 patients treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) as a boost to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical parameters were correlated with morbidity scores of the EPIC (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index) questionnaire. Median time after radiotherapy (HDR-BT up to 18 Gy in two fractions and EBRT up to a median dose of 50.4 Gy) was 1.5 and 3 years (first and second questionnaire).

RESULTS

A significant impact of a urethra D1 exceeding 15 Gy in at least one HDR fraction concerning urinary morbidity and a rectum D1 exceeding 6 Gy to the rectal mucosa in the first and second HDR fraction concerning the rectal bleeding rate was found. A higher number of needles was associated with lower urinary and bowel scores after 1.5 years. A prostate length >4.8 cm and a longer duration of EBRT (independently of the dose) predisposed for lower urinary and bowel scores. In contrast to a urethra D1 > 15 Gy as an independent factor, a rectum D1 > 6 Gy per HDR fraction correlated with a higher number of needles and an increased prostate length.

CONCLUSIONS

To minimize morbidity in HDR-BT for prostate cancer, a maximum dose to the urethra of 15 Gy and a maximum dose to the rectal mucosa of 6 Gy is advisable. Treatment- and patient-related factors have a major impact on toxicity.

Evaluation of anatomy-based dwell position and inverse optimization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison to a conventional cylindrical dwell position, geometric optimization, and dose-point optimization

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To compare treatment planning methods in high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy of prostate cancer. In particular, to assess quantitatively the dosimetric superiority, if any, of the anatomy-based dwell position (ABDP) and inverse optimization (IO) over the conventional cylindrical dwell position (CDP), geometric optimization (GO), and dose-point optimization (DO) in terms of the determination of dwell positions and dwell times.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between September 2002 and April 2003, 10 cases of treatment-planning CT images were taken for external radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Treatment planning computer software and the CT data were used to create hypothetical HDR brachytherapy applicator needles, which were properly implanted in the prostate. Six different plans including IO with ABDP (IO(ABDP)), IO with CDP (IO(CDP)), GO with ABDP (GO(ABDP)), GO with CDP (GO(CDP)), DO with ABDP (DO(ABDP)), and DO with CDP (DO(CDP)) were made for each case, that is, 60 plans in total. All plans were normalized so that the D(95) should be equal to 100% of the prescribed dose. Dose-volume histograms from all 60 plans were analyzed, and multiple implant quality indices, including CI, EI, DNR, %V(R 75), %V(B 75), and %V(U 150) for each plan, were extracted and compared. Then, the best settings for IO(ABDP) regarding dwell position and dose limit were sought for.

RESULTS

ABDP showed a statistically significantly lower EI (P<0.001), %V(R 75) (P=0.002), and %V(B 75) (P=0.015) than CDP. IO showed a statistically significantly lower %V(U 150) than GO (P=0.009), or than DO (P<0.001). Given a definition that a figure exceeding three-fold of the minimum figure of the index is clinically unacceptable, only in IO(ABDP) all index figures were clinically acceptable, while in the other five plans at least one index figure was unacceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

In the CT-based treatment planning for prostate HDR brachytherapy, ABDP is useful to achieve a high conformity, which leads to a reduction of the doses to the bladder, rectum, and surrounding normal tissue. IO is useful to lower the urethral dose without sacrificing conformity. IO(ABDP) is recommended on the basis of the current study. However, this conclusion has been drawn from the idealized hypothetical settings, and some possibility remains that this conclusion is not always applicable to the real implants.

High dose brachytherapy (real time) in patients with intermediate-or high-risk prostate cancer: technical description and preliminary experience

INTRODUCTION

It has been well documented that the outcome of prostate cancer treatment depends on the dose administered. Hence, techniques have been developed that allow high-dose administration without increasing the complications, e.g. external radiotherapy combined with high-dose radiation (HDR) brachytherapy. In this article we analyse the technique and protocol of real-time HDR brachytherapy together with the preliminary results that support its use. Materials and methods. Between June 1998 and December 2004, 100 patients with adenoma of the prostate were treated with 46 Gy of external irradiation to the pelvis and 2 HDR brachytherapy fractions (each of 1150 cGy) at the end of weeks 1 and 3 of a 5-week radiotherapy course. The 1997 American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) system was used to establish disease stage. Patients with intermediate-risk (PSA 10-20 ng/ml or Gleason = 7 or T2c) and high-risk (two intermediate risk factors or PSA > 20 ng/ml or Gleason > 7 or > T2c) without metastases were eligible for the brachytherapy. Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus panel statement. SPSS statistical package was used to quantify survival (Kaplan-Meier method). Toxicity was scored according to RTOG guidelines.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 67 years (range 49-78). Clinical stage was T2a in 22% of the patients, 26% T2b and 52% T3. Initial PSA was = 10 ng/ml in 22% of the patients and > 10 ng/ml in 78%. Median follow-up was 28 months (range: 12-79). The 5-year overall survival and actuarial biochemical control were 99% and 87% respectively. No chronic severe complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The good results of local control, disease-free survival and few complications that the external radiotherapy combined with HDR brachytherapy have shown suggest that the method should be considered as first-choice in the treatment of prostate tumours of high- and intermediate-risk.

The emerging role of high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer

By placing radioactive sources directly into the cancer, brachytherapy allows delivery of a highly conformal radiation dose to the prostate. Permanent seed brachytherapy is most commonly used for low-risk cancer, whereas high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is combined with external-beam radiotherapy to treat higher risk disease. The high rate of dose delivery and the large fraction size may be a radiobiological advantage for tumours with high sensitivity to radiation fraction size. The ability to optimise dose delivery allows for exquisite shaping of dose around the prostate and sparing of normal tissues. HDR brachytherapy is most commonly delivered in two or more fractions of 810 Gy combined with 40-50 Gy external beam. Published studies are almost entirely limited to single-institution case series. Most of the patients treated have relatively unfavourable localised disease, with a reported disease-free survival of 68-93%, and a local control rate of over 90%. Treatment is well tolerated, with urethral stricture the most common late effect (risk around 8%). Early results using HDR monotherapy in low-risk disease seem promising. Patients most likely to benefit from a combined HDR/external-beam approach have bulky local disease (stage T2b-T3) or intermediate to high-grade cancers. Prospective multicentre studies of HDR brachytherapy have begun in this patient group in Canada and the USA, which hopefully will allow future comparisons with high-dose conformal external-beam techniques.

Lack of benefit from a short course of androgen deprivation for unfavorable prostate cancer patients treated with an accelerated hypofractionated regime

PURPOSE

High-dose radiotherapy, delivered in an accelerated hypofractionated course, was utilized to treat prostate cancer. Therapy consisted of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided conformally modulated high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. The purpose of this report is (1) to assess long-term comparative outcomes from three trials using similar accelerated hypofractionated regimes; and (2) to examine the long-term survival impact of a short course of < or =6 months adjuvant/concurrent androgen deprivation when a very high radiation dose was delivered.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1986 and 2000, 1,260 patients were treated at three institutions with pelvic EBRT (36-50 Gy) integrated with HDR prostate brachytherapy. The total dose including brachytherapy was given over 5 weeks. The biologic equivalent EBRT dose ranged between 90 and 123 Gy (median, 102 Gy) using an alpha /beta of 1.2. Patient eligibility criteria included a pretreatment prostate-specific antigen > or =10, Gleason score > or =7, or clinical stage > or =T2b. A total of 1,260 patients were treated, and 934 meet the criteria. Kiel University Hospital treated 198 patients; William Beaumont Hospital, 315; and California Endocurietherapy Cancer Center, 459 patients. Brachytherapy dose regimes were somewhat different between centers and the dose was escalated from 5.5 x 3 to 15 Gy x 2 Gy. Patients were divided for analysis between the 406 who received up to 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy and the 528 patients who did not. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 18 months (3 times the exposure to androgen deprivation therapy). The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology biochemical failure definition was used.

RESULTS

Mean age was 69 years. Median follow-up time was 4.4 years (range, 1.5-14.5); 4 years for androgen deprivation therapy patients and 4.9 for radiation alone. There was no difference at 5 and 8 years in overall survival, cause-specific survival, or biochemical control among the three institutions. The corresponding 8-year rates with and without androgen deprivation therapy were biochemical control 85% and 81%; overall survival 83% and 78%; cause-specific survival 89% and 94%; and metastatic rates of 16.6% and 7.3%. A multivariate analysis revealed androgen deprivation therapy did not predict for biochemical failure for either the entire group or the subset of 177 patients harboring all three poor prognostic factors. Moreover, adding androgen deprivation therapy strongly correlated with higher rates of both metastasis (p = 0.09; hazard ratio, 2.08) and cancer-related deaths (p = 0.02, hazard ratio 3.25). These negative results for the most unfavorable group led us to question if androgen deprivation therapy might have a deleterious impact through delay in delivery of the potentially curative radiation or whether there may be a biologic basis by fixing the cycling cells in G0.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated hypofractionated pelvic EBRT integrated with TRUS-guided conformally modulated HDR administered to 1,260 patients in three institutions was an excellent method of delivering very high radiation dose to the prostate in 5 weeks. Similar high overall, cause-specific, and biochemical no evidence of disease survival rates achieved show that prostate HDR can be successfully delivered in academic and community settings. At 8 years, the addition of a course of < or =6 months of neoadjuvant/concurrent androgen deprivation therapy to a very high radiation dose did not confer a therapeutic advantage but added side effects and cost. Furthermore, for the most unfavorable group, there was a higher rate of distant metastasis and more prostate cancer-related deaths. We question the value of a short course of androgen deprivation therapy when used with high-dose radiation.

GEC/ESTRO-EAU recommendations on temporary brachytherapy using stepping sources for localised prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of this paper is to present the GEC/ESTRO-EAU recommendations for template and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided transperineal temporary interstitial prostate brachytherapy using a high dose rate iridium-192 stepping source and a remote afterloading technique. Experts in prostate brachytherapy developed these recommendations on behalf of the GEC/ESTRO and of the EAU. The paper has been approved by both GEC/ESTRO steering committee members and EAU committee members.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Interstitial brachytherapy (BT) to organ confined prostate cancer can be applied as a boost treatment in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) using a proper number of BT fractions in curative intent. Temporary transperineal BT alone or in combination with EBRT are feasible as a palliative/salvage treatment modality because of local recurrence, however, without large clinical experience. The use of temporary BT as a monotherapy is subject of ongoing clinical research.

RESULTS

Recommendations for pre-treatment investigations, patient selection, equipment and facilities, the clinical team, the implant procedure (treatment planning and needle implantation) dose and fractionation, reporting, management of side effects and follow-up are given.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations are intended to be technically and advisory in nature, but the ultimate responsibility for the medical decision rests with the treating physician. Although, this paper represents the consensus of an interdisciplinary group of experts, TRUS and template guided temporary transperineal interstitial implants in prostate cancer are a constantly evolving field and the recommendations are subject to modifications as new data become available.

Long-term outcome of high dose rate brachytherapy in radiotherapy of localised prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

High dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in prostate cancer (PC) is receiving increasing interest. The steep dose gradient gives a possibility to escalate the dose to the prostate. If the alpha/beta ratio is low for PC, hypofractionation will be of advantage. A retrospective analysis of outcome in patients (pts) consecutively treated with combined HDR-BT and conformal external beam radiotherapy (ERT) was performed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from 214 pts treated consecutively from 1988 to 2000 were analysed. The median age was 64 years (50-77). Median follow up was 4 years (12-165 months). Pre-irradiatory endocrine therapy was given to 150 pts (70%). The pts were divided into low-, intermediate- and high (80/87/47 pts) risk groups according to the occurrence of none, one, or more risk factors defined by T-classification, PSA and histopathology. ERT was given with 2 Gy fractions to 50 Gy. HDR-BT consisted of two 10 Gy fractions.

RESULTS

Overall 5-year biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) was 82%, and for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk group bNED was 92, 88 and 61%, respectively. PSA-relapse was found in 17, local recurrence in 3 and distant metastases in 13 pts. Five pts died of PC. No recurrences were observed after 5 years. Severe late complications were few. Urethral stricture (13 pts) was the most frequent. No severe rectal complications were seen.

CONCLUSION

Dose escalation with HDR-BT is safe and effective in radiotherapy of localised PC.

High dose rate brachytherapy: its clinical applications and treatment guidelines

Brachytherapy has the advantage of delivering a high dose to the tumor while sparing the surrounding normal tissues. With proper case selection and delivery technique, high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy has great promise, because it eliminates radiation exposure, allows short treatment times, and can be performed on an outpatient basis. Additionally, use of a single-stepping source, allows optimization of dose distribution by varying the dwell time at each dwell position. However, when HDR brachytherapy is used, the treatments must be executed carefully, because the short treatment times do not allow any time for correction of errors, and mistakes can result in harm to patients. Hence, it is very important that all personnel involved in HDR brachytherapy be well trained and be constantly alert. It is expected that the use of HDR brachytherapy will greatly expand over the next decade and that refinements will occur primarily in the integration of imaging (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, intraoperative ultrasonography) and optimization of dose distribution. It is anticipated that better tumor localization and normal tissue definition will help to optimize dose distribution to the tumor and reduce normal tissue exposure. The development of well-controlled randomized trials addressing issues of efficacy, toxicity, quality of life, and costs-versus-benefits will ultimately define the role of HDR brachytherapy in the therapeutic armamentarium.

Health-related quality of life in men after treatment of localized prostate cancer with external beam radiotherapy combined with 192ir brachytherapy: A prospective study of 93 cases using the EORTC questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25

PURPOSE

To describe prospectively the long-term health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and treatment-related symptoms in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy and radical radiotherapy (RT), including external beam RT and iridium high-dose-rate brachytherapy, and to compare them with age-matched normative data.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 93 patients with T1-T3a tumors consecutively treated with definitive RT at our institution completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and QLQ-prostate specific 25-item (PR25) module twice at an 18-month interval 0-18 months after RT. Subgroups were analyzed regarding acute and late effects on symptoms and quality of life.

RESULTS

The main analysis included 80 patients who were disease free at the final assessment. The levels of HRQOL were generally high, did not change over time, and were comparable to the normative data. Symptom development (urinary, bowel, and sexual) correlated well with the known acute and late effects of radical RT and neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy.

CONCLUSION

Combining external beam RT and HDR brachytherapy when treating prostate cancer did not appear to impair HRQOL and was comparable to that of other brachytherapy methods. The negative contribution from late neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy on symptom development seemed to be substantial but mostly transitory. Additional research is needed to determine the long-term HRQOL (3-5 years), and interventional randomized studies are suggested.

High-dose-rate iridium-192 afterloading therapy combined with external beam radiotherapy for T1c-T3bN0M0 prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) for T1c-T3bN0M0 prostate cancer in a prospective clinical trial of concurrent external beam RT and fractionated iridium-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

METHODS

Included in the study were 98 patients with T1c-T3bN0M0 prostate cancer who were diagnosed between October 1997 and September 2002 and underwent high-dose-rate brachytherapy with external beam RT. Treatment consisted of external beam RT (four ports) to the prostate of 16 fractions of 2.3 Gy to a total dose of 36.8 Gy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy of 4 fractions of 6.0 Gy within 30 hours to a total dose of 24.0 Gy. No patient received adjuvant hormonal therapy after RT.

RESULTS

The most recent prostate-specific antigen level was 0.0 to 3.9 ng/mL (median 0.4). Seven patients (7.1%) developed recurrence and treatment was considered a failure (bone metastasis in two and biochemical failure in five). The overall biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) rate was 95.9% at 2 years and 92.9% at 5 years. The bDFS rate by T stage was 98.6% at 2 years and 95.9% at 5 years for Stage T1c-T2b and 88.0% and 84.0% for Stage T3a-b, respectively (P = 0.047). The 2-year and 5-year bDFS rate was better in patients with an initial prostate-specific antigen level of less than 20 ng/mL compared with 20 ng/mL or greater (98.6% and 97.1% versus 93.1% and 82.8%, respectively, P = 0.0261). Acute toxicity was mild to moderate (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 1-2) and consisted of cystourethritis or proctitis in 29 (29.6%) of 98 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

With a low complication rate and satisfactory bDFS rates, this combination therapy can be considered an alternative method for clinical Stage T1c-T3b prostate cancer and is expected to improve patient quality of life. Additional long-term follow-up is needed to confirm this treatment.

Clinical results of combined treatment conformal high-dose-rate iridium-192 brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy using staging lymphadenectomy for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To report the first long-term biochemical control rate of patients treated with two protocols using a combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer in Japan.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between October 1997 and July 2001, 71 patients with localized prostatic adenocarcinoma were treated with a combination of EBRT and HDR brachytherapy. Patient age ranged from 58 to 81 years (mean 70.5). Of the 71 patients, 12, 41, and 18 had Stage T1c, T2, and T3, respectively, according to the International Union Against Cancer classification system (1997). The mean initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 24.2 ng/mL (median, 11.9 ng/mL); 30% of the patients had an initial PSA level >20 ng/mL. Of the 71 patients, 31 had received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Hormonal therapy before treatment was stopped at the beginning of RT in all cases. Patients in this series were treated on two protocols. In the initial protocol, patients were treated with whole pelvis EBRT to 45.0 Gy in 25 fractions and three HDR fractions of 5.5 Gy each (35 patients). In the second protocol, patients were treated with prostatic EBRT to 41.8 Gy in 19 fractions, with an added staging lymphadenectomy to rule out lymph node metastasis for patients with high-risk factors, and four HDR fractions of 5.5 Gy each (36 patients). The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition for biochemical failure was used. Acute and chronic toxicities were scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines. Follow-up ranged from 24 to 65 months (median, 44 months).

RESULTS

Of the 71 patients, 69 were alive at the last follow-up. Two patients had died of hepatocellular carcinoma and gastric cancer at 3.5 and 4.0 years after treatment with no biochemical failure. Sixty-six patients (93%), including the two who had died of intercurrent disease, showed a tendency for a PSA decline after treatment and had no biochemical or clinical evidence of disease at the last follow-up visit. Sixty patients (85%) achieved PSA nadir levels of < or =1.0 ng/mL. The biochemical/clinical failure-free control rate at 3 and at 5 years was 93% and 93%, respectively. The bladder and rectal complications were minimal.

CONCLUSION

Despite the high frequency of high-risk patients in the present patient population, the actuarial biochemical control rate was 93% at 5 years. Acute and chronic toxicity with this method was acceptable. Additional long-term follow-up is required to assess this treatment, because the median survival is not likely to be reached for several years.

Dosimetric impact of prostate volume change between CT-based HDR brachytherapy fractions

PURPOSE

The objective is to evaluate the prostate volume change and its dosimetric consequences after the insertion of catheters for high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For 13 consecutive patients, a spiral CT scan was acquired before each of the 2 fractions, separated on average by 20 hours. The coordinates of the catheters were obtained on 3 axial CT slices corresponding to apex, mid portion, and base portion of the prostate. A mathematical expansion model was used to evaluate the change of prostate volumes between the 2 fractions. It is based on the difference in the cube of the average distance between the centroid and catheter positions. The variation of implant dose-volume histograms between fractions was computed for plans produced by either inverse planning based on simulated annealing or geometric optimization.

RESULTS

The average magnitude of either increase or reduction in prostate volume was 7.8% (range, 2-17%). This volume change corresponds to an average prostate radius change of only 2.5% (range, 0.7-5.4%). For 5 patients, the prostate volume increased on average by 9% (range, 2-17%), whereas a reduction was observed for 8 patients by an average of 7% (range, 2-13%). More variation was observed at the prostate base than at mid or apex gland. The comparison of implant dose-volume histograms showed a small reduction of V100 receiving the prescription dose, with an average of 3.5% (range, 0.5-12%) and 2.2% (range, 1-6%) for inverse planning based on our simulated annealing and geometric optimization plans, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Small volume change was observed between treatment fractions. This translates into small changes in dose delivered to the prostate volume.

Analysis of serial CT scans to assess template and catheter movement in prostate HDR brachytherapy

PURPOSE

As prostate high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy becomes more prevalent, varying amounts of catheter displacement have been noted. To investigate the constancy of catheter position and its impact on dose distribution, we analyzed serial dosimetric CT scans.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The data from 50 patients were analyzed. During initial CT treatment planning, transverse images of the implant volume were collected, and all structures were digitized into the Nucletron Brachytherapy Planning System. Digitally reconstructed radiographs were generated with rendering of the catheter tips, ischial tuberosity, and perineal template. The distance from each catheter tip to the template and to the ischial tuberosity was measured. The distance between the ischial tuberosity and the template was similarly measured. A second CT set was obtained at different intervals and compared with the first measurement to assess catheter and/or template movement. In 10 patients, the second CT set was obtained before the third fraction in both 2-mm and 5-mm slice sequences, and the latter was used to re-create the HDR plan.

RESULTS

Although no interfraction catheter movement relative to the template was found, the template-catheter unit moved in a caudal direction between HDR fractions. The amount of displacement was time dependent: 2 mm before the second fraction, 8 mm before the third, and 10 mm before the fourth. When comparing the first HDR treatment with the third, median decreases in the following dosimetric parameters were noted: dose to 90% of the prostate volume, 35% (r = 0-60); minimal dose to the base, 35% (r = 17-65); and maximal dose to 1 cm(3), 13% (r = 3-19%).

CONCLUSION

The interstitial catheters did not slip within the template and were not caudally displaced independently but rather in conjunction with the template. The displacement occurred in a time-dependent fashion, and, without redress, significant dosimetric changes are encountered by the third fraction.

No Apparent Benefit at 5 Years From a Course of Neoadjuvant/Concurrent Androgen Deprivation for Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated With a High Total Radiation Dose

PURPOSE

We examined the survival impact of a course of 6 months or less of adjuvant/concurrent androgen deprivation in patients with unfavorable prostate cancer treated to high radiation doses with external beam (EBRT) and a high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1986 and 2000, 507 patients were treated with pelvic EBRT (46 Gy) with HDR prostate brachytherapy as a boost. The biological equivalent EBRT dose was between 90 and 130 Gy. At Kiel University and at William Beaumont Hospital 198 and 309 patients were treated. Patient eligibility was pretreatment prostate specific antigen 10 ng/ml or greater, Gleason score 7 or greater, or clinical stage T2b or greater. The brachytherapy dose was escalated from 5.5 x 3 to 15 x 2 Gy. Patients were divided between 177 receiving and 330 not receiving androgen suppression therapy (AST). AST was given for a mean of 6 months. The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology biochemical failure definition was used.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 68 years. Mean followup was 4.8 years (range 0.7 to 15.3), that is 4.5 years for AST and 4.9 for radiation alone. Five-year actuarial rates for biochemical control were 74% and 76%, for overall survival they were 81% and 87%, and for disease-free survival they were 67% and 66%, while cause specific survival with and without AST was 90% and 98%, and the 5-year metastatic rates were 10.7% and 6.9%, respectively. On multivariate analysis AST did not improve biochemical control.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic EBRT interdigitated with a transrectal ultrasound guided HDR boost is an excellent method of delivering a high radiation dose to the prostate without rendering the patient radioactive. This trial showed high overall, cause specific and no biochemical evidence of disease survival. For this unfavorable group of patients the addition of a course of 6 months or less of neoadjuvant/concurrent AST to a high radiation dose did not appear to confer a 5-year therapeutic advantage. However, it added side effects and the significant cost of hormones.

[Curative radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. Treatment methods and results]

Radiation oncology has undergone rapid technical development during the last few years. The further development of treatment planning systems and treatment machines had a major impact on the improvement of radiation therapy results in prostate cancer. This paper presents different treatment modalities and results. Currently available are three-dimensional conformal radiation, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), high dose rate brachytherapy, and low dose rate brachytherapy (seed implantation). All modalities offer the possibility for dose escalation, which is essential for curative treatment. Dose escalation using these techniques makes it possible to reduce the dose for the surrounding organs at risk. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy can be delivered with doses up to 78 Gy. The biochemical control rate is up to 90% depending on the risk factors T stage, initial PSA, and Gleason score. The incidence of late side effects is <10%. IMRT is a newer modality for percutaneous radiotherapy. By individual dose modification in the treatment fields, doses >80 Gy can be delivered in small treatment volumes. Treatment has to be highly precise to avoid dose peaks in the organs at risk, i.e., rectum and bladder. The preliminary data for remission and toxicity rates are promising, but it is too early for final conclusions. For cases with high-risk factors such as PSA >10 ng/ml, Gleason score >6, and stage T3, percutaneous radiation can be combined with neoadjuvant or adjuvant hormonal treatment. Randomized trials showed an improvement of the results in favor of combined treatment. HDR brachytherapy in combination with external radiation is a good option for dose escalation in patients with locally advanced tumors and/or other high-risk factors. The biochemical control rates are between 60 and 84%, late effects occur in less than 10%. Seed implantation (LDR brachytherapy) as sole treatment is indicated for prognostically favorable situations (PSA <10 ng/ml, Gleason score < or =6, and T1c or T2a tumors). The biochemical control rates are between 80 and 90%. Toxicity consists of urine retention and proctitis, occurring in 10-20% of the patients.