Inactivated hepatitis A vaccine: long-term antibody persistence

Viral hepatitis in pregnancy

Viral hepatitis is caused by a heterogenous group of viral agents representing a wide range of phylogenetic groups. Many viruses can involve the liver and cause liver injury but only a subset are delineated as 'hepatitis viruses' based upon their primary site of replication and tropism for hepatocytes which make up the bulk of the liver cell population. Since their discovery, beginning with the agent that caused serum hepatitis in the 1960s, the alphabetic designations have been utilized. To date, we have five hepatitis viruses, A through E, though it is postulated that others may exist. This chapter will focus on those viruses. Note that hepatitis D is included as a subset of hepatitis B, as it cannot exist without concurrent hepatitis B infection. Pregnancy has the potential to affect all aspects of these viral agents due to the unique immunologic and physiologic changes that occur during and after the gestational period. In this review, we will discuss the most common viral hepatitis and their effects during pregnancy.

SARS-CoV-2-Specific Antibody (Ab) Levels and the Kinetic of Ab Decline Determine Ab Persistence Over 1 Year

In a SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence study conducted with 1,655 working adults in spring of 2020, 12 of the subjects presented with positive neutralization test (NT) titers (>1:10). They were here followed up for 1 year to assess their Ab persistence. We report that 7/12 individuals (58%) had NT_50 titers ≥1:50 and S1-specific IgG ≥50 BAU/ml 1 year after mild COVID-19 infection. S1-specific IgG were retained until a year when these levels were at least >60 BAU/ml at 3 months post-infection. For both the initial fast and subsequent slow decline phase of Abs, we observed a significant correlation between NT_50 titers and S1-specific IgG and thus propose S1-IgG of 60 BAU/ml 3 months post-infection as a potential threshold to predict neutralizing Ab persistence for 1 year. NT_50 titers and S1-specific IgG also correlated with circulating S1-specific memory B-cells. SARS-CoV-2-specific Ab levels after primary mRNA vaccination in healthy controls were higher (Geometric Mean Concentration [GMC] 3158 BAU/ml [CI 2592 to 3848]) than after mild COVID-19 infection (GMC 82 BAU/ml [CI 48 to 139]), but showed a stronger fold-decline within 5-6 months (0.20-fold, to GMC 619 BAU/ml [CI 479 to 801] vs. 0.56-fold, to GMC 46 BAU/ml [CI 26 to 82]). Of particular interest, the decline of both infection- and vaccine-induced Abs correlated with body mass index. Our data contribute to describe decline and persistence of SARS-CoV-2-specific Abs after infection and vaccination, yet the relevance of the maintained Ab levels for protection against infection and/or disease depends on the so far undefined correlate of protection.

Immunogenicity persistence in children of hepatitis A vaccines Healive® and Havrix®: 11 years follow-up and long-term prediction

Background: Hepatitis A vaccine has been used in mass and routine public vaccination programs in China. Long-term follow-up studies are required to determine the duration of protection and the need for booster vaccinations. Methods: A prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial was performed to compare the geometric mean concentration (GMC) and seroprotection rates of anti-Hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibodies elicited by the inactivated vaccines Healive and Havrix. 400 healthy children were randomly assigned 3:1 ratio to receive two doses of Healive or Havrix at 0 and 6 months. Persistence of anti-HAV antibodies for 5 years post immunization has been reported The current study reports new data at 11 years post immunization for the purpose of showing antibody persistence. Sensitivity analyzes were performed to assess the results. In addition, predictions for long-term antibody persistence were performed using a statistical model. Two different serological assays were used that were shown to be 98.3% concordant for detecting anit-HAV antibody. Results: GMCs were significantly higher following Healive compared to Havrix at 1, 6, 7, 66, 112 and 138 months post-vaccination. In addition, the GMCs obtained using sensitivity analysis were very similar to those obtained using the original models. Prediction analysis indicated that the duration of protection for both vaccines was at least 30 years after immunization, with a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for GMC of greater than 20mIU/mL. Conclusions: Healive is more immunogenic than Havrix in children at 11 years post full immunization. Prediction analysis indicated at least 30 years of antibody persistence for both vaccines.

Successful Vaccines

Vaccines are considered one of the most important advances in modern medicine and have greatly improved our quality of life by reducing or eliminating many serious infectious diseases. Successful vaccines have been developed against many of the most common human pathogens, and this success has not been dependent upon any one specific class of vaccine since subunit vaccines, non-replicating whole-virus or whole-bacteria vaccines, and attenuated live vaccines have all been effective for particular vaccine targets. After completing the initial immunization series, one common aspect of successful vaccines is that they induce long-term protective immunity. In contrast, several partially successful vaccines appear to induce protection that is relatively short-lived and it is likely that long-term protective immunity will be critical for making effective vaccines against our most challenging diseases such as AIDS and malaria.

Hepatitis A immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A

This review is withdrawn because it is outdated. A new review is to be published by the end of 2019.

A model for the regulation of follicular dendritic cells predicts invariant reciprocal-time decay of post-vaccine antibody response

Follicular dendritic cells (FDC) play a crucial role in the regulation of humoral immunity. They are believed to be responsible for long-term persistence of antibody, due to their role in antibody response induction and their ability to retain antigen in immunogenic form for long periods. In this article, a regulatory control model is proposed which links persistence of humoral immunity with cellular processes associated with FDCs. The argument comprises three elements. The first is a literature review of population-level studies of post-vaccination antibody persistence. It is found that reciprocal-time (∝1/t) decay of antibody levels is widely reported, over a range of ages, observation times and vaccine types. The second element is a mathematical control model for cell population decay for which reciprocal-time decay is a stable attractor. Additionally, control effectors are easily identified, leading to models of homeostatic control of the reciprocal-time decay rate. The final element is a literature review of FDC functionality. This reveals a striking concordance between cell properties required by the model and those widely observed of FDCs, some of which are unique to this cell type. The proposed model is able to unify a wide range of disparate observations of FDC function under one regulatory principle, and to characterize precisely forms of FDC regulation and dysregulation. Many infectious and immunological diseases are increasingly being linked to FDC regulation, therefore a precise understanding of the underlying mechanisms would be of significant benefit for the development of new therapies.

Persistence of antibodies 20 y after vaccination with a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine

Vaccination is the most effective and well-tolerated method of conferring long-term protection against hepatitis A and B viruses (HAV; HBV). Long-term studies are required to characterize the duration of protection and need for boosters. Following primary immunization of 150 and 157 healthy adults with 3-doses of combined hepatitis A/hepatitis B vaccine (HAB; Twinrix™, GSK Vaccines, Belgium) at 0-1-6 months in 2 separate studies, we measured vaccine-induced antibody persistence against HAV and HBV annually for 20 y (Study A: NCT01000324; Study B: NCT01037114). Subjects with circulating anti-HAV antibodies < 15 mIU/mL or with anti-hepatitis B surface antigen < 10 mIU/mL were offered an additional monovalent hepatitis A and/or B vaccine dose (Havrix™/Engerix™-B, GSK Vaccines, Belgium). Applying the immunogenicity results from these studies, mathematical modeling predicted long-term persistence. After 20 y, 18 and 25 subjects in studies A and B, respectively, comprised the long-term according-to-protocol cohort for immunogenicity; 100% and 96.0% retained anti-HAV antibodies ≥ 15 mIU/mL, respectively; 94.4% and 92.0% had anti-HBs antibodies ≥ 10 mIU/mL, respectively. Between Years 16–20, 4 subjects who received a challenge dose of monovalent hepatitis A vaccine (N = 2) or hepatitis B vaccine (N = 2), all mounted a strong anamnestic response suggestive of immune memory despite low antibody levels. Mathematical modeling predicts that 40 y after vaccination ≥ 97% vaccinees will maintain anti-HAV ≥ 15 mIU/mL and ≥ 50% vaccinees will retain anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL. Immunogenicity data confirm that primary immunization with 3-doses of HAB induces persisting anti-HAV and anti-HBs specific antibodies in most adults for up to 20 y; mathematical modeling predicts even longer-term protection.

Comparison of immunogenicity and persistence between inactivated hepatitis A vaccine Healive® and Havrix® among children: A 5-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Inactivated vaccines for hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection are widely used in China. Mass vaccination programs drive the need for data on long-term persistence of vaccine-induced protection.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial was conducted to compare geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and seroconversion rates (SRs) of anti-HAV antibody elicited by the inactivated vaccines Healive and Havrix for 5 y post immunization, in which 400 healthy children were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive 2 doses of Healive or Havrix at 0 and 6 month. Anti-HAV antibody concentration was detected by microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) during the study. Furthermore, an attempt was made to predict persistence of protective immunogenicity by using a suitable statistical model.

RESULTS

The GMCs were significantly higher after vaccination with Healive than after Havrix as comparator vaccine at 1, 6, 7, 18, 30, 42, 54 and 66 month (P < 0.01) with the peak point at 7 month (3427.2 mIU/ml for Healive and 1441.9 mIU/ml for Comparator). Similarly significant differences of SRs were found between the 2 groups at 1 and 6 month (P < 0.01). Afterwards, the SRs of both groups reached 100% at 7 month and did not decline until 66 month(99.1% for Healive and 97.5% for Comparator). A linear mixed model with a change point at 18 month(Model 3) was found to be suitable to predict persistence of protective immunogenicity induced by vaccines. It was estimated that the duration of protection for Healive was at least 20 y with a lower limit of GMC 95% confidence interval (CI) no less than 20 mIU/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with Havrix, the new preservative-free inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Healive) in 2 doses showed better persistence of antibody concentrations for 5 y after full-course immunization among children and the persistence of protective immunogenicity was estimated for at least 20 y.

Long-term antibody persistence after vaccination with a 2-dose Havrix (inactivated hepatitis A vaccine): 20 years of observed data, and long-term model-based predictions

Antibody persistence in two cohorts of adults, who received inactivated hepatitis A (HAV) vaccine (1440El.U; Havrix; GSK Vaccines) according to a 0-6 or 0-12 month schedule in 1992-1993, has been measured annually. After 20 years, >97% of the subjects in both studies were seropositive for anti-HAV antibodies. Geometric mean concentrations in the according-to-protocol cohorts were 312 mIU/ml in 34/36 subjects vaccinated initially at 0-6 months (NCT00289757) and 317 mIU/ml in 85/86 subjects vaccinated at 0-12 months (NCT00291876). Over the whole follow-up period, seven subjects (2+5, respectively) lost circulating anti-HAV antibodies but mounted a strong response after HAV booster administration (1440El.U). Mathematical modelling, which was applied to assess true persistence at Year 20 (accounting for drop-outs and missing data), and to predict longer-term persistence confirmed previous estimates that seropositive anti-HAV levels would persist in ≥95% vaccinees at Year 30 and ≥90% at Year 40. ClinicalTrials.Gov number: NCT00289757/NCT00291876.

Hepatitis A and considerations regarding the cost-effectiveness of vaccination programs

Hepatitis A vaccines have demonstrated a high degree of immunogenicity and an excellent safety profile. Immunization of certain populations and patient subgroups is recommended according to specific epidemiological and clinical factors, such as a greater likelihood of acquisition of infection or concerns regarding the risk of development of fulminant hepatitis and death. Therefore, the economic implications of routine and/or targeted vaccination programs in the general population and high-risk individuals have been examined. In this manuscript, the available data from the literature regarding the cost-effectiveness of hepatitis vaccination programs in healthy individuals and in those with chronic liver disease are reviewed.

Duration of Neutralizing Antibody Titer after Japanese Encephalitis Vaccination

In paired serum samples collected from 17 children, we measured neutralizing antibody (NTAb) titers after the second series of routine Japanese encephalitis (JE) vaccination in Japan to estimate the duration of NTAb titer when children did not receive the third series of routine vaccination by applying a random coefficient model. We also measured NTAb titers in adult serum samples to confirm the duration of NTAb titer estimated in the analysis of pediatric serum samples. In the absence of the third series of routine vaccination, 18% (3/17), 47% (8/17), 82% (14/17) and 100% (17/17) of children were estimated to become NTAb negative at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years after the second series of routine vaccination, respectively. Of 38 adults, 39.5% (15/38) became NTAb negative; the percentage was somewhat lower than that of antibody-negative children. The results suggested that JE vaccination schedule should be reevaluated in the future.

Seroprevalence of anti-hepatitis a antibody among 1 - 15 year old children in kashan-iran

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, hepatitis A is a common infection during childhood especially in developing countries. It can cause severe complications in adults and patients with underlying diseases.

OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to determine the seroprevalence of hepatitis A in 1 - 15 year-old children of Kashan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was performed on 666 one to fifteen year-old children from health-care centers in Kashan city during 2012. Total antibodies against hepatitis A were measured in sera by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

Totally, 3.9% of children were seropositive. Mean number of family members was 3.92 ± 0.89. There was no difference in seroprevalence of hepatitis A relative to sex, family size, mean age and age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this city, a great proportion of children are susceptible to hepatitis A and it's complications at an older age. This decrease in seropositivity may be caused by elevated hygien level. According to our results hepatitis A vaccination is recommended at early childhood such as that of other regions where low prevalence of hepatitis A infection is found.

Immune response to hepatitis A vaccination in HIV-infected men in Greece

HIV-infected patients are at increased risk for acquiring hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection. We evaluated the seroconversion rate (anti-HAV antibodies ≥ 20 mIU/ml) and the geometric mean antibody titres (GMTs) in a group of 351 HIV infected men, who had received two doses of a hepatitis A vaccine. We analysed blood samples collected at one, six, 12 and 18 months following the administration of the second dose of the vaccine. The seroconversion rate one month after the second dose of the vaccine was 74.4% (260/351). At month 18 after the end of vaccination, 56.1% of the subjects remained seropositive. GMTs were 315, 203, 153 and 126 mIU/ml at months 1, 6, 12, and 18, respectively. Logistic regression revealed that the CD4 count is the only factor affecting response to vaccination (P = 0.019). A higher response rate and higher GMTs were observed in patients with CD4 counts ≥ 500 cells/mm(3) (76.6%) than in patients with CD4 counts 200-499 cells/mm(3). In conclusion, even in patients with near-normal CD4 counts, the response to the hepatitis A vaccine is impaired.

Hepatitis A immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A

BACKGROUND

In many parts of the world, hepatitis A infection represents a significant cause of morbidity and socio-economic loss. Whilst hepatitis A vaccines have the potential to prevent disease, the degree of protection afforded against clinical outcomes and within different populations remains uncertain. There are two types of hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine, inactivated and live attenuated. It is important to determine the efficacy and safety for both vaccine types.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical protective efficacy, sero-protective efficacy, and safety and harms of hepatitis A vaccination in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to November 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing HAV vaccine with placebo, no intervention, or appropriate control vaccines in participants of all ages.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were undertaken by two authors and verified by a third author. Where required, authors contacted investigators to obtain missing data. The primary outcome was the occurrence of clinically apparent hepatitis A (infectious hepatitis). The secondary outcomes were lack of sero-protective anti-HAV immunoglobulin G (IgG), and number and types of adverse events. Results were presented as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Dichotomous outcomes were reported as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), using intention-to-treat analysis. We conducted assessment of risk of bias to evaluate the risk of systematic errors (bias) and trial sequential analyses to estimate the risk of random errors (the play of chance).

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 11 clinical studies, of which only three were considered to have low risk of bias; two were quasi-randomised studies in which we only addressed harms. Nine randomised trials with 732,380 participants addressed the primary outcome of clinically confirmed hepatitis A. Of these, four trials assessed the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (41,690 participants) and five trials assessed the live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine (690,690 participants). In the three randomised trials with low risk of bias (all assessing inactivated vaccine), clinically apparent hepatitis A occurred in 9/20,684 (0.04%) versus 92/20,746 (0.44%) participants in the HAV vaccine and control groups respectively (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.30). In all nine randomised trials, clinically apparent hepatitis A occurred in 31/375,726 (0.01%) versus 505/356,654 (0.18%) participants in the HAV vaccine and control groups respectively (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.17). These results were supported by trial sequential analyses. Subgroup analyses confirmed the clinical effectiveness of both inactivated hepatitis A vaccines (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.30) and live attenuated hepatitis A vaccines (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.17) on clinically confirmed hepatitis A. Inactivated hepatitis A vaccines had a significant effect on reducing the lack of sero-protection (less than 20 mIU/L) (RR 0.01, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.03). No trial reported on a sero-protective threshold less than 10 mIU/L. The risk of both non-serious local and systemic adverse events was comparable to placebo for the inactivated HAV vaccines. There were insufficient data to draw conclusions on adverse events for the live attenuated HAV vaccine.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis A vaccines are effective for pre-exposure prophylaxis of hepatitis A in susceptible individuals. This review demonstrated significant protection for at least two years with the inactivated HAV vaccine and at least five years with the live attenuated HAV vaccine. There was evidence to support the safety of the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine. More high quality evidence is required to determine the safety of live attenuated vaccines.

Long-term protective effects of hepatitis A vaccines. A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Data on duration and long-term protective effects of hepatitis A vaccines (HepA) have not been reviewed using a systematic approach. Our objective is to provide a comprehensive review of evidence on the duration of protection achieved by HepA, which is needed for revising existing vaccine policies. Limitations in data availability and implications for future research in this area are discussed.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted including all studies published between 1997 and 2011 reporting on long-term protection of HepA. The outcomes considered were hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection and sero-protection measured by anti-HAV antibodies after follow-up times of over 5 years post-vaccination.

RESULTS

299 studies were identified from MEDLINE and 51 studies from EMBASE. 13 manuscripts met our inclusion criteria. The maximum observation times and reported persistence levels of sero-protective anti-HAV antibodies was 15 years for live attenuated HepA and 14 years for inactivated HepA. All data were from observational studies and showed that higher number of doses of live attenuated vaccine led to higher seropositivity and GMT, but dosage and schedule did not significantly impact the long-term protection following inactivated vaccine. Few comparisons were made between the two vaccine types indicating highest levels of antibody titers achieved by multiple doses of live attenuated vaccines 7 years post-vaccination.

CONCLUSION

Available data indicate that both inactivated and live attenuated HepA are capable of providing protection up to 15 years as defined by currently accepted, conservative correlates of protection. Further investigations are needed to continue to monitor the long-term protection afforded by these vaccines. Standardized methods are required for vaccine-follow-up studies including assessment of co-variables potentially affecting long-term protection.

Long-term durability of immune responses after hepatitis A vaccination among HIV-infected adults

BACKGROUND

Vaccination provides long-term immunity to hepatitis A virus (HAV) among the general population, but there are no such data regarding vaccine durability among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected adults.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied HIV-infected adults who had received 2 doses of HAV vaccine. We analyzed blood specimens taken at 1 year, 3 years, and, when available, 6-10 years postvaccination. HAV immunoglobulin G (IgG) values of ≥10 mIU/mL were considered seropositive.

RESULTS

We evaluated specimens from 130 HIV-infected adults with a median age of 35 years and a median CD4 cell count of 461 cells/mm(3) at or before time of vaccination. Of these, 49% had an HIV RNA load <1000 copies/mL. Initial vaccine responses were achieved in 89% of HIV-infected adults (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-94%), compared with 100% (95% CI, 99%-100%) of historical HIV-uninfected adults. Among initial HIV-infected responders with available specimens, 90% (104 of 116; 95% CI, 83%-95%) remained seropositive at 3 years and 85% (63 of 74; 95% CI, 75%-92%) at 6-10 years. Geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) among HIV-infected adults were 154, 111, and 64 mIU/mL at 1, 3, and 6-10 years, respectively, compared with 1734, 687, and 684 mIU/mL among HIV-uninfected persons. Higher GMCs over time among HIV-infected adults were associated with lower log(10) HIV RNA levels (β = -.12, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Most adults with well-controlled HIV infections had durable seropositive responses up to 6-10 years after HAV vaccination. Suppressed HIV RNA levels are associated with durable HAV responses.

Seroepidemiology of hepatitis A virus in Kuwait

AIM: To find the current seroepidemiology of hepatitis A virus (HAV) in Kuwait.

METHODS: A total of 2851 Kuwaitis applying for new jobs were screened.

RESULTS: HAV-positive cases were 28.8%; 59% were males and 41% were females. The highest prevalence was in the Ahmadi area. High prevalence was among the group of non-educated rather than educated parents. This is the first study in Kuwait demonstrating the shifting epidemiology of HAV.

CONCLUSION: This study reflects the need of the Kuwaiti population for an HAV vaccine.

Persistence of seroprotection 10 years after primary hepatitis A vaccination in an unselected study population

Hepatitis A vaccines have been demonstrated to be highly immunogenic. Mathematical models have predicted antibodies to persist for at least 20-25 years. Most of these studies have been conducted in young and healthy study populations. We aimed to evaluate long-term immunity 10 years following complete primary immunization according to a 3-dose schedule (Havrix 720 El.U at months 0, 1, 6-12) in an adult and unselected study population. In total, 999 (98.3%) of 1016 vaccinees (mean age 54.7+/-S.D. 13.0), tested 10 years after primary vaccination, still had protective antibody levels (> or = 10 mIU/ml) as measured by ELISA. An anti-HAV titer cut off level of 11,400 mIU/ml was calculated to differentiate between vaccine-induced and infection-induced titer levels. The vaccine-induced geometric mean titer (GMT) was 406.1 mIU/ml (95% CI: 369.2-446.7 mIU/ml), showing an age-related trend, the 10-years seroprotection rate (SPR) was 97.9%. Females exhibited significantly higher GMTs than male vaccinees (p<0.001). The only parameter predicting a titer below 10 mIU/ml 10 years after vaccination was the body mass index (p=0.001). This study confirms that protection following primary hepatitis A vaccination persists for more than 10 years.

Cell mediated and antibody immune response to inactivated hepatitis A vaccine

The humoral and cellular immune response to inactivated hepatitis A vaccine was investigated dynamically in a time elapse study over 1 year. Fourty-five healthy volunteers, seronegative for anti-HAV, were vaccinated with 1440 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay units (EU) of formalin-inactivated hepatitis A virus following a 0--6-month schedule. Serum anti-HAV levels and HAV-specific proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells were measured at several time points over a 26- and 28-week period after the first and second injection, respectively. Distinct B and T cell responses were determined within 14 days after primary vaccination. The booster vaccination-induced immediate peak levels for the humoral (anti-HAV GMC=5376mIU/ml) as well as the cellular (median Deltacpm=14173cpm) response.

Experience with hepatitis A and B vaccines

The lengthy history of efforts to understand the pathogenesis and means of preventing and controlling both hepatitis A and B is noteworthy for many exceptional scientific achievements. Among these are the development of vaccines to prevent the spread of infection through induction of active immunity to hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV). The first plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccine was licensed in the United States in 1981 and was replaced by recombinant hepatitis B vaccines in 1986 and 1989. Vaccines to prevent HAV infection were licensed in the United States in 1995 and 1996. Subsequently, combination vaccines that included both hepatitis A and B vaccine components, or the hepatitis B component in combination with other commonly administered vaccines, were licensed in the United States. Despite significant reductions in hepatitis-related morbidity and mortality that have resulted from widespread use of these vaccines, vaccine-preventable morbidity and mortality still occur. The purposes of this article are to review clinical trial and other experience with hepatitis A and B vaccines in healthy individuals as well as in those with chronic liver disease, infected with the human immunodeficiency virus, or requiring hemodialysis; describe the impact that these vaccines and national recommendations for vaccination have had on reducing the incidence of HAV and HBV infection; and recommend expansion of these recommendations to include universal vaccination of adults as a means of further reducing the burden of viral hepatitis.

Interchangeability and tolerability of a virosomal and an aluminum-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccine

The interchangeability of virosomal (Epaxal) and aluminum-adsorbed (Havrix 1440) hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccines was studied in 111 healthy adults who were vaccinated in a randomized, single-blind, crossover clinical trial. Anti-HAV antibody titers were measured at days 0 (first dose), 14, and 28, and months 3, 6, 12 (second dose), 13, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72. Most subjects (>95%) had sero-converted 14 days after the first dose of either vaccine. The second dose with either vaccine induced a high antibody response in all vaccines, irrespective of the type of vaccine administered as the first dose. Although both vaccines were well tolerated, the incidence of local adverse events (in particular pain) was significantly lower in subjects receiving the virosomal vaccine. Six-year follow-up data did not reveal any significant differences between the vaccination groups.

Hepatitis A

Hepatitis A infection is typically transmitted by the fecal-oral route. Symptomatic infection is highly dependent on the age of the patient and usually follows a self-limited course. Once diagnosed, clinical and biochemical follow-up in the outpatient setting is generally appropriate. Treatment aims are to achieve symptomatic relief and to maintain adequate hydration and caloric intake. In patients with more severe disease, hospitalization may be needed to accomplish aggressive symptomatic therapy and close monitoring of liver function tests and mental status. Prompt evaluation for liver transplantation is appropriate in the rare case where fulminant liver failure develops. Given the absence of specific therapy for hepatitis A virus infection, the most important health care intervention is prevention of infection and/or transmission, which can be accomplished with the safe and effective use of immune globulin and commercially available vaccines.

Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis A-B vaccine versus hepatitis B vaccine for healthcare and public safety workers in the western United States

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of substituting hepatitis A-B vaccine for hepatitis B vaccine when healthcare and public safety workers in the western United States are immunized to protect against occupational exposures to hepatitis B.

PARTICIPANTS

A cohort of 100,000 hypothetical healthcare and public safety workers from 11 western states with hepatitis A rates twice the national average.

DESIGN

A Markov model of hepatitis A was developed using estimates from U.S. government databases, published literature, and an expert panel. Added costs of hepatitis A-B vaccine were compared with savings from reduced hepatitis A treatment and work loss. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as the ratio of net costs to quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained.

RESULTS

Substituting hepatitis A-B vaccine would prevent 29,796 work-loss-days, 222 hospitalizations, 6 premature deaths, and the loss of 214 QALYs. Added vaccination costs of $5.4 million would be more than offset by $1.9 million and $6.1 million reductions in hepatitis A treatment and work loss costs, respectively. Cost-effectiveness improves as the time horizon is extended, from $232,600 per QALY after 1 year to less than $0 per QALY within 11 years. Estimates are most sensitive to community-wide hepatitis A rates and the degree to which childhood vaccination may reduce future rates.

CONCLUSION

For healthcare and public safety workers in western states, substituting hepatitis A-B vaccine for hepatitis B vaccine would reduce morbidity, mortality, and costs.

A review of licensed viral vaccines, some of their safety concerns, and the advances in the development of investigational viral vaccines

Viral vaccines could be considered among the most important medical achievements of the 20th century. They have prevented much suffering and saved many lives. Although some curative antiviral drugs exist, we desperately depend on efforts by academic, governmental and industrial scientists in the advancement of viral vaccines in the prevention and control of infectious diseases. In the next decade, we hope to see advancement in the development of current and investigational viral vaccines against childhood and adult infections. In this article, we will review the licensed viral vaccines, some of their safety concerns, and the advances in the development of investigational viral vaccines.

Cost effectiveness of hepatitis A/B versus hepatitis B vaccination for US prison inmates

Hepatitis B immunization is provided in many US prison systems. We examined the cost effectiveness of substituting bivalent hepatitis A/B vaccine in this setting, considering regional variation in hepatitis A risks and the potential for disease transmission by former prisoners. Where hepatitis A rates are >200, 100-200, and <100% the national average, declines in hepatitis A treatment costs would offset 137, 88, and 40% of the bivalent vaccine's added cost. In the three regions considered, cost effectiveness would be US$ <0, 2131, and 22,819 per life-year saved, respectively. Prison-based hepatitis A/B immunization would meet accepted standards of cost effectiveness throughout the US.

Vaccines and immunotherapies for the prevention of infectious diseases having cutaneous manifestations

Although the development of antimicrobial drugs has advanced rapidly in the past several years, such agents act against only certain groups of microbes and are associated with increasing rates of resistance. These limitations of treatment force physicians to continue to rely on prevention, which is more effective and cost-effective than therapy. From the use of the smallpox vaccine by Jenner in the 1700s to the current concerns about biologic warfare, the technology for vaccine development has seen numerous advances. The currently available vaccines for viral illnesses include Dryvax for smallpox; the combination measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; inactivated vaccine for hepatitis A; plasma-derived vaccine for hepatitis B; and the live attenuated Oka strain vaccine for varicella zoster. Vaccines available against bacterial illnesses include those for anthrax, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis. Currently in development for both prophylactic and therapeutic purposes are vaccines for HIV, herpes simplex virus, and human papillomavirus. Other vaccines being investigated for prevention are those for cytomegalovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, hepatitis C, and dengue fever, among many others. Fungal and protozoan diseases are also subjects of vaccine research. Among immunoglobulins approved for prophylactic and therapeutic use are those against cytomegalovirus, hepatitis A and B, measles, rabies, and tetanus. With this progress, it is hoped that effective vaccines soon will be developed for many more infectious diseases with cutaneous manifestations.

Regional variation in the cost effectiveness of childhood hepatitis A immunization

BACKGROUND

Routine childhood hepatitis A immunization is recommended in regions with incidence rates twice the national average, but it may be cost-effective in a wider geographic area.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the costs and benefits of potential hepatitis A immunization of healthy US children in regions with varying hepatitis A incidences.

METHODS

We considered vaccination of the 2000 US birth cohort in states defined by historic hepatitis A incidence rates. Infections among potential vaccinees and their personal contacts were predicted from age 2 through 85 years. Net vaccination costs were estimated from health system and societal perspectives and were compared with life-years saved and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained using a 3% discount rate. RESULTS Nationally vaccination would prevent >75 000 cases of overt hepatitis A disease. Approximately two-thirds of health benefits would accrue to personal contacts rather than to vaccinees themselves. In states with incidence rates of > or =200%, 100 to 199%, 50 to 99% and <50% the national average, societal costs per QALY gained would be <0, <0, 13,800 and 63,000 US dollars, respectively. Nationally vaccination would cost 9100 US dollars per QALY gained from the perspective of the health system and 1400 US dollars per QALY gained from society's perspective. Results are most sensitive to vaccination costs and rates of disease transmission through personal contact.

CONCLUSION

Childhood hepatitis A vaccination is most cost-effective in areas with the highest incidence rates but would also meet accepted standards of economic efficiency in most of the US. A national immunization policy would prevent substantial morbidity and mortality, with cost effectiveness similar to that of other childhood immunizations.

Long-term immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine (LA-1 strain)

AIM

To evaluate the long-term protective efficacy following a large scale immunization with a live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine (the LA-1 strain) and immune persistence of the vaccine with different immunization schedules.

METHODS

A randomized controlled double-blind study was conducted in 212 985 children between 1.5 and 10 years of age from 8 counties in Guangxi province (10 0735 in vaccine group and 112 250 in control group). Vaccine group was received one dose of HAV vaccine of 10^6.75 TCID₅₀ (LA-1 strain, China). Surveillance of the incidence of hepatitis A in the two groups was started 1 month after vaccination. To evaluate the persistence of antibodies, 156 children of 6-9 years old with hepatitis A antibody negative were divided into 3 groups with equalities in age and sex. Group A was given one dose of the vaccine, Group B and C were immunized according to 0, 6 and 0, 12 schedules respectively. During follow-up of every individual, the blood specimens were collected at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after immunization in Group A and 12, 24 and 36 months after first dose and 1 month after second dose in Group B and C. Anti-HAV levels were expressed as GMTs in mIU/ml by serial immunoglobulin dilutions (WHO standard) and HAVAB-Imx kit (Abbott Lab, USA).

RESULTS

During a follow-up for 36 months, 71 cases of symptomatic HAV infection were found in the control and 2 in the vaccine group (63.25/10⁶vs 1.99/10⁶ respectively). The protective efficacy was estimated at 96.85% with 95% lower confidence limit of 92.4%. The antibody positive rate in Group A after 6-24 months was 88.6-91.4%, the GMT was 105-106 mIU/ml, but each of those decreased to 80.0% and 99.20 mIU/ml after 36 months. GMT reached to the top in Group B and C1 month after the second dose, 1024.63 mIU/ml and 3 463.21 mIU/ml respectively. But during the time from top GMT to 24th month, the GMT of Group B and C decreased rapidly to about 59.4% and 83% respectively, and it continually declined slowly at 36^th month to 459.68 mIU/ml and 506.23 mIU/ml, which were 6% and 15% lower than that at 24^th month. It showed that the antibody level in Group B and C after 2 doses were significantly higher than that in Group A from beginning to end, at 36th month the GMT of Group B and C were 4.6 times and 5.1 times to that of Group A, and the antibody positive rate (97%) was higher than that of Group A (80%) at the same time.

CONCLUSION

A single dose of live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine can come into being high and persistent protection against hepatitis A. Booster dose induces an immune response which persists for at least three years in 97% of the subjects. The high GMT still present at month 36 predicts a long-term persistence of antibody.

Hepatitis A vaccination options for Australia

The epidemiology of hepatitis A is changing, with an increasing proportion of the population becoming susceptible to infection. The burden of hepatitis A is comparable to that of other vaccine-preventable diseases for which new vaccines are available. Options for vaccination include selective programmes for high-risk groups, which could involve screening prior to vaccination, or universal programmes for infants and/or adolescents. Selective programmes have been shown to be highly cost-effective if well implemented, but there is evidence that they might be poorly implemented. If a universal vaccination programme were considered for Australia, an infant programme, with doses at 18 months and 2 years, possibly with an additional adolescent programme, would be the recommended option. Universal hepatitis A vaccination for infants and/or adolescents is of comparable cost-effectiveness compared with other preventive strategies, but needs to be considered in the context of competing vaccination options.

Long-term immunogenicity of an inactivated virosome hepatitis A vaccine

The aim of this study was to predict the long-term protection induced after immunisation with inactivated, aluminium-free virosome hepatitis A vaccine. The study population consisted of adult volunteers enrolled in four different clinical trials. Lower 95% confidence interval limits and seroconversion rate were calculated by using a linear mixed model to estimate the persistence of serum antibodies over time. To assess the robustness of the mathematical model, several sensitivity analyses were performed with more conservative protective threshold (20 mIU/ml vs. 10 mIU/ml), higher yearly decline rate, and exclusion of volunteers who had increasing titres over time. Based on 190 volunteers with at least two valid assessments of titres from year 3 onward, the median duration of protection was 55.5 years, with a lower limit of the 95% CI of 48.7 years. Duration below 25.3 years was predicted for only 5% of the subjects. Women tended to have higher titres to start with, but their rate of decline was higher, resulting in similar duration of protection overall. The use of a more conservative threshold, higher yearly decline rate, and exclusion of volunteers with increasing titres over time did not affect these results. According to this model, 95% of the volunteers should have anti-HAV titres above the minimum protective threshold for 20 years or more following immunisation with two doses of this aluminium-free vaccine.

The cost-effectiveness of vaccinating chronic hepatitis C patients against hepatitis A

OBJECTIVES

Although hepatitis A vaccination is recommended for persons with chronic liver disease, the cost-effectiveness of vaccinating patients with chronic hepatitis C virus has not been extensively studied. We evaluated its costs and benefits.

METHODS

A Markov model was used to assess cost-effectiveness from the health system and societal perspectives. Costs of hepatitis A screening and vaccination were compared with savings from reduced hepatitis A treatment and work loss to determine net costs of a "screen and vaccinate" strategy. Net costs were compared with longevity gains to assess cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

Based on hypothetical cohorts of 100,000 patients, vaccination would reduce the number of hepatitis A cases 63-72%, depending on patient age. Screening and vaccination costs of $5.2 million would be partially offset by $1.5-$2.8 million reductions in hepatitis A treatment costs and $0.2-$1.0 million reductions in work loss costs. From the health system perspective, vaccination would cost $22,256, $50,391, and $102,064 per life-year saved for patients vaccinated at ages 30, 45, and 60 yr, respectively. Cost-effectiveness ratios improve when work loss prevention is considered. Results are most sensitive to hepatitis A infection and hospitalization rates, and the rate used to discount future benefits to their present values.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis A vaccination of chronic hepatitis C patients would substantially reduce morbidity and mortality in all age groups examined. Consistent with other medical interventions for chronic hepatitis C patients, cost-effectiveness is most favorable for younger patients.

Safety and efficacy of hepatitis A vaccination in liver transplantation recipients

OBJECTIVE

Vaccination against hepatitis A (HAV) has been shown to be safe and effective in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). The safety and efficacy of HAV vaccines in liver transplant (OLT) recipients have not been established. The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in OLT recipients.

METHODS

Thirty-seven HAV seronegative OLT recipients were enrolled. Patients received two doses of vaccine 6 months apart. Postvaccination IgG anti-HAV were determined at 1, 6, and 7 months after the first vaccine dose. Side effects were monitored for 3 days after each vaccination shot. An unvaccinated control group (45 patients) was followed for evidence of seroconversion. Seroconversion rate was also compared with those reported in healthy patients and in patients with chronic liver disease.

RESULTS

Testing was available for all the cases at 1 month, and for 26 and 23 patients at 6 and 7 months, respectively. Only 3 of 37 patients (8%) had seroconversion at 1 month. At 6- and 7-month time points, 5 of 26 (19%) and 6 of the 23 (26%) patients had seroconversion, respectively. Vaccine responders had higher total white blood cell count and lymphocyte count and were further out from transplant compared with nonresponders. None of the unvaccinated patients had seroconversion over the follow-up time. Seroconversion rates in OLT recipients were significantly lower than that reported in healthy individuals (P=0.001) or in pre-OLT patients with CLD (P=0.001). All patients tolerated the vaccine well.

CONCLUSIONS

HAV vaccination is safe in OLT recipient. Efficacy of HAV vaccination in OLT recipients, as measured by a commercially available enzyme immunoassay, is low and alternative strategies should be developed to improve response rate.

A hepatitis B vaccine formulated with a novel adjuvant system

Although more than 95% of the vaccinated population responds to the currently licensed vaccines against hepatitis B, some groups were found to be low responders. Lipid A as adjuvant, through its ability to activate macrophages, might improve humoral as well as cellular immune response. Therefore we evaluated the profile of a hepatitis B vaccine with the new adjuvant system SBAS4. 150 young adults were enrolled and randomized into three groups: one received the SBAS4 hepatitis B vaccine, the second Engerix-B(TM) and the third a hepatitis B vaccine with an alternative formulation on alum. Vaccinations were at 0 and 6 months. The vaccine was well tolerated. At month 7 all vaccinees were protected but with significant differences in GMTs between groups: 13,271 mIU/ml for the SBAS4 group versus 1203 and 1823 mIU/ml. Hence the hepatitis B vaccine with the new adjuvant system is more immunogenic compared to the other vaccines containing the same antigen and could be suitable for a two dose schedule.

Current update of pediatric hepatitis vaccine use

Vaccines are now available for the prevention of hepatitis A and hepatitis B. In this article, biologics are reviewed with special attention to their use in the pediatric patient. Special attention is paid to issues that developed in 1999. For hepatitis A vaccine, it is the change in US recommendations regarding increased use in higher-risk US locations. For hepatitis B vaccine, it is the concern about toxicity, real or imagined.

Hepatitis A vaccine administration: comparison between jet-injector and needle injection

INTRODUCTION

Type A hepatitis virus (HAV) is a serious health problem throughout the world and can be spread via fecal-oral contact. Both immune globulin and an HAV vaccine provide protection, but the vaccine gives complete protection. Efficacy of methods of vaccination in relation to the formation of anti-HAV antibodies is unclear; thus, this study seeks to determine if significant differences exist between the syringe as compared to the jet injection technique. The purpose of this study was to compare in a randomized trial Biojet jet-injection system to a needle-syringe method. To determine if a significant difference between these two methods in seroconversion rates or geometric mean titers of anti HAV antibody occurs at day 15, 30, and 210 days after vaccination.

METHOD

Anti-HAV IgG(-) adult hospital employees were randomized to receive 1440 EL.U of hepatitis a vaccine (HAVRIX(R)) in 2 doses by either needle or jet-injector (Biojector(R)) system at month 0 and 6. HAV seroconversion titer results were measured by the Boehringer-Mannheim method.

RESULTS/DISCUSSION

A higher proportion of persons who received HAV vaccine via the Biojector(R) seroconverted with anti-HAV level >/=20 mIU at day 15, 30, and month 7 when compared with a needle injection.Side-effect profiles reported by participants in both methods were below those identified in current published and insert information, but the Biojector(R) had greater local reactivity in all categories when compared to the needle method.

Hepatitis A antibodies in liver transplant recipients: evidence for loss of immunity posttransplantation

Liver transplant recipients frequently have chronic liver diseases and should be considered for vaccination against hepatitis A virus (HAV). However, persistence of protective antibodies after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has not been shown in this population, which may have implications for future vaccine recommendations. We evaluated the prevalence and epidemiological significance of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody to HAV (anti-HAV) in a nonvaccinated population before OLT (immunity from previous exposure) and determined the persistence of IgG anti-HAV at 1 and 2 years after OLT. One hundred consecutive patients were identified who underwent OLT and had at least 2 years of follow-up post-OLT. They were not vaccinated against HAV infection at any time. Clinical data were summarized from medical records, and stored sera were tested for IgG anti-HAV before OLT and at 1 and 2 years after OLT by a commercially available enzyme immunoassay. Of 100 patients, 24 had IgG anti-HAV before OLT. No epidemiological differences were noted between those with or without detectable IgG anti-HAV before OLT. Among patients with detectable IgG anti-HAV before OLT, 4 of 22 patients (18%) and 7 of 24 patients (29%) became negative for IgG anti-HAV at 1 and 2 years post-OLT, respectively. None of the patients with undetectable IgG anti-HAV before OLT became positive at any time. Most of our patients with end-stage liver disease had no serological evidence for immunity against HAV. A significant proportion of patients with detectable protective antibodies before OLT lost their antibodies at 2 years after OLT.

Comparison of two immunization schedules with an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (AvaximTM)

BACKGROUND

Inactivated hepatitis A vaccines are licensed with a vaccination schedule based on two injections of vaccine given at least 6 months apart.

METHODS

Two vaccination schedules for the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, AvaximTM (Pasteur Mérieux Connaught, Lyon, France), were compared in a monocentric, randomized, open trial. Two doses of the vaccine were given at intervals of either 6 months (0-6 month group) or 12 months (0-12 month group) to 96 adult volunteers. Anti-hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibody titers were determined in a blind fashion using the modified RIA (mRIA) HAVABtrade mark assay. After excluding subjects with positive preimmunization anti-HAV titers and those with protocol deviations, both groups were still comparable by sex ratio and mean age.

RESULTS

Four weeks (28 6 4 days) after the first dose, the seroconversion (SC) rate of initially HAV-seronegative subjects (antibody titer < 20 mIU/mL) was 100% in the 0-6 month group and 96. 9% in the 0-12 month group, with corresponding geometric mean titer (GMT) values (95% CI) of 369 mIU/mL (274-497 mIU/mL) and 445 mIU/mL (292-679 mIU/mL), respectively. After 6 months, SC was obtained in all subjects, and the corresponding GMT values were 349 mIU/mL and 359 mIU/mL in the 0-6 month group and the 0-12 month group, respectively. Four weeks after the booster dose given at 6 months, a 14.5-fold rise in GMT was observed. In the 0-12 month group, anti-HAV GMT values decreased by only 20% from 6 months to 12 months with a pre-booster GMT value of 286 mIU/mL at the 12-month evaluation. Four weeks after the booster given at 12 months, a 22. 5-fold rise in GMT was observed. Statistical analysis showed that the two vaccination schedules were comparable in their ability to boost antibody titers. Unsolicited reactions to vaccination were not different to those reported during earlier trials. Less than 12% of the vaccinees reported reactions after the first dose (11/93), or after the booster dose (11/92).

CONCLUSIONS

This trial demonstrated antibody persistence is excellent for at least 12 months after one dose of this vaccine, and that a booster may be given at any time between 6 and 12 months after primary immunization.

Estimated persistence of anti-HAV antibodies after single dose and booster hepatitis A vaccination (0-6 schedule)

The persistence of antibodies after a single dose and booster vaccination against hepatitis A (Havrix 1440) has not yet been assessed. By reanalysing previously published data of serum titres and application of a two-component model, we estimated the duration of protection. In 134 vaccinees, aged 20-39 years, the GMT 1 month after booster was 3629 mlU/ml, which would result in an estimated duration of protection of 34.5 years and in 66 vaccinees aged 40-62 years a GMT of 2320 mlU/ml was calculated, resulting in a duration of protection of 31.5 years. Even when taking the minimum observed titres in the older age group into account, the duration of protection will be more than 10 years. Considering at the same time, its good tolerability and compliance, the single dose hepatitis A vaccination appears highly recommendable in travel medicine.

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of Avaxim (160 AU) as compared with Havrix (1440 EL.U) as a booster following primary immunization with Havrix (1440 EL.U) against hepatitis A

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis A vaccination is recommended for travelers from the UK to areas of moderate or high endemicity. Two licensed hepatitis A vaccines are now available in the UK, and this trial was undertaken to determine whether Avaxim can be used as a booster following a primary course of Havrix.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-five subjects were randomized to receive a booster dose of either Avaxim (n=92) or Havrix (n=93), 6 to 7 months after a primary dose of Havrix. Subjects were observed for 30 minutes for immediate reactions and subsequently completed a diary card for a further 2 weeks. Serology samples for HAV antibody titers were taken at 28 6 7 days later.

RESULTS

One month following the booster dose, all subjects in both treatment groups achieved HAV antibody titers >= 20 mIU/mL. In the Avaxim group, geometric mean titer (GMT) values increased from 642 mIU/mL (97.5% CI 330-1250 mIU/mL) to 6669 mIU/mL (4566-9740 miu/mL), compared with 739 mIU/mL (379-1443 mIU/mL) at baseline to 4460 mIU/mL (2880-6908 mIU/mL) following the administration of Havrix. The increase in GMT following the administration of Avaxim was significantly greater than that following Havrix (p=.02). Eight percent of subjects reported pain at the injection site following a booster dose of Havrix, compared with none following Avaxim. This difference in reactogenicity was statistically significant (p=.01). In all other respects, both preparations were safe and equally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Either Avaxim or Havrix may be given as a booster dose of hepatitis A vaccine when Havrix has been administered as the primary dose.