The superiorly based pharyngeal flap: a modification of the transoral approach to the upper cervical spine

Posterior temporary fixation of C1-C2 screw-rod system for unstable C1 burst fracture

Whether an unstable C1 burst fracture should be treated surgically or conservatively is controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and motion-preserving function of temporary fixation of C1-C2 screw-rod system for the reduction and fixation of unstable C1 burst fracture. We retrospectively reviewed 10 patients who were treated with posterior C1-C2 temporary fixation without fusion. We assessed age at surgery, gender, pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), atlanto-dens interval (ADI), lateral mass distance (LMD), and rotation function of C1-C2 complex. Six males and 4 females were included in our study. The average follow-up duration was 14.1 ± 1.37 months. The left-to-right ROMs of C1-C2 rotation was 9.6° ± 1.42°. The preoperative cervical VAS was 8.30 ± 0.48; the postoperative cervical VAS of C1-C2 fusion was 2.90 ± 0.57. The preoperative VAS for removal was 2.0 ± 0.00, and the postoperative VAS for removal was 2.3 ± 0.48. The preoperative cervical NDI was 81.40% ± 2.07%, the postoperative cervical NDI of C1-C2 fusion was 18.10% ± 1.52%. The preoperative NDI for removal was 15.9% ± 1.20%. The postoperative NDI for removal was 14.5% ± 1.08%. The preoperative ADI was 4.43 ± 0.34 mm, and postoperative ADI was 1.94 ± 0.72 mm. The preoperative LMD was 6.36 ± 0.58 mm, and postoperative LMD was 1.64 ± 0.31 mm. Posterior temporary C1-C2 fixation can achieve a good fusion and satisfied reduction of C1 fracture, relieve the pain, improve the cervical function outcome, but may reduce the rotational range of motion of C1-C2. Posterior C1-C2 temporary fixation without fusion was not suitable for C1 burst fracture. We recommend permanent C1-C2 fixation and fusion for C1 burst fracture if surgery is necessary.

Atlas Fractures: Diagnosis, Current Treatment Recommendations, and Implications for Elderly Patients

Fractures of the C1 vertebrae (atlas) are commonly the result of falls and other trauma, which cause hyperextension, or axial compression of the cervical spine. Although historically thought as a benign injury with lower neurological risks, current data suggests that this may not hold true for geriatric patients (aged 65 y and older) who may be predisposed to these fractures even after lower-energy trauma such as ground-level falls. Advancements in orthopedic trauma care has increased our diagnostic abilities to identify and manage patients with C1 fractures and other upper cervical spine trauma. However, there are no universal treatment guidelines based on level I trials. Current treatment ranges from nonoperative to operative management depending on fracture-pattern and integrity of the surrounding ligaments. Furthermore, in the elderly patients these fractures present a unique dilemma due to preexisting comorbidities and contraindications to various treatment modalities. C1 fractures warrant greater recognition to provide optimal treatment to patients and minimize the risk for developing complications. The goal of this review is to highlight the most updated treatment guidelines and to discuss the complications of both operative and nonoperative management of C1 fractures especially among the elderly patient population.

Unilateral lag-screw technique for an isolated anterior 1/4 atlas fracture

STUDY DESIGN

Fractures of the atlas are classified based on the fracture location and associated ligamentous injury. Among patients with atlas fractures treated using external immobilization, nonunion of the fracture could be seen.

OBJECTIVE

Ideally, treatment strategy for an unstable atlas fracture would involve limited fixation to maintain the fracture fragments in a reduced position without restricting the range of motion (ROM) of the atlantoaxial and atlantooccipital joints.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Such a result can be established using either transoral limited internal fixation or limited posterior lateral mass fixation. However, due to high infection risk and technical difficulty, posterior approaches are preferred but none of these techniques can fully address anterior 1/4 atlas fractures such as in this case.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A novel open and direct technique in which a unilateral lag screw was placed to reduce and stabilize a progressively widening isolated right-sided anterior 1/4 single fracture of C1 that was initially treated with a rigid cervical collar is described.

RESULTS

Radiological studies made after the surgery showed no implant failure, good cervical alignment, and good reduction with fusion of C1.

CONCLUSIONS

It is suggested that isolated C1 fractures can be surgically reduced and immobilized using a lateral compression screw to allow union and maintain both C1-0 and C1-2 motions, and in our knowledge this is the first description of the use of a lag screw to achieve reduction of distracted anterior 1/4 fracture fragments of the C1 from a posterior approach. This technique has the potential to become a valuable adjunct to the surgeon's armamentarium, in our opinion, only for fractures with distracted or comminuted fragments whose alignment would not be expected to significantly change with classical lateral mass screw reduction.

RESULTS OF THE USE OF PEEK CAGES IN THE TREATMENT OF BASILAR INVAGINATION BY GOEL TECHNIQUE

ABSTRACT Objective: Analysis of the use of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages for atlantoaxial facet realignment and distraction for treatment of basilar invagination by Goel technique. Method: Retrospective descriptive statistical analysis of the neurological status, pain, presence of subsidence and bone fusion with the use of PEEK cages in 8 atlantoaxial joints of 4 patients with basilar invagination. All patients were treated with atlantoaxial facet distraction and realignment and subsequent arthrodesis C1-C2 by the technique of Goel modified by the use of PEEK cage. Results: All patients showed improvement in Nurick neurological assessment scale and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain. There were no cases of subsidence, migration, or damage to the vertebral artery during the insertion of the cage. All joints evolved with bone fusion, assessed by dynamic radiographs, and computed tomography. Two patients developed neuropathic pain in dermatome of C2 and one patient had unilateral vertebral artery injury during C2 instrumentation treated with insertion of pedicle screw to control the bleeding. Conclusion: The results of the treatment of basilar invagination by the Goel technique with the use of PEEK cages shown to be effective and safe although further studies are needed to confirm this use.

Unstable Jefferson fractures: Results of transoral osteosynthesis

BACKGROUND

Majority of C1 fractures can be effectively treated conservatively by immobilization or traction unless there is an injury to the transverse ligament. Conservative treatment usually involves a long period of immobilization in a halo-vest. Surgical intervention generally involves fusion, eliminating the motion of the upper cervical spine. We describe the treatment of unstable Jefferson fractures designed to avoid these problems of both conservative and invasive methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 12 patients with unstable Jefferson fractures treated with transoral osteosynthesis of C1 between July 2008 and December 2011 was performed. A steel plate and C1 lateral mass screw fixation were used to repair the unstable Jefferson fractures. Our study group included eight males and four females with an average age of 33 years (range 23-62 years).

RESULTS

Patients were followed up for an average of 16 months after surgery. Range of motion of the cervical spine was by and large physiologic: Average flexion 35° (range 28-40°), average extension 42° (range 30-48°). Lateral bending to the right and left averaged 30° and 28° respectively (range 12-36° and 14-32° respectively). The average postoperative rotation of the atlantoaxial joint, evaluated by functional computed tomography scan was 60° (range 35-72°). Total average lateral displacement of the lateral masses was 7.0 mm before surgery (range 5-12 mm), which improved to 3.5 mm after surgery (range 1-6.5 mm). The total average difference of the atlanto-dens interval in flexion and extension after surgery was 1.0 mm (range 1-3 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Transoral osteosynthesis of the anterior ring using C1 lateral mass screws is a viable option for treating unstable Jefferson fractures, which allows maintenance of rotation at the C1-C2 joint and restoration of congruency of the atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial joints.

Posterior osteosynthesis of the atlas for nonconsolidated Jefferson fractures: a new surgical technique

STUDY DESIGN

Case report and surgical technique.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a new technique to treat atlas burst fractures by selectively reconstructing the atlas from a posterior approach.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The two surgical techniques reported until now for stabilizing atlas burst fractures are associated with some drawbacks. Posterior C0-C2 or C1-C2 fixations significantly reduce head rotation, while the transoral C1 lateral masses osteosynthesis can be associated with oropharyngeal and neurological complications. We propose a new surgical technique for the treatment of unstable Jefferson fractures aimed at avoiding these problems.

METHODS

A 25-year-old man presented with a Jefferson type III atlas fracture after a traffic accident. The fracture failed to consolidate after 3 months of halo brace immobilization. Surgery consisted in inserting bilateral posterior C1 lateral mass screws interconnected by a transversal rod, thereby creating a second C1 posterior arch under the fractured one.

RESULTS

Postoperative course was uneventful. Immediate postoperative stability was confirmed on dynamic X-ray films and head rotation was preserved. Delayed computed tomography scan demonstrated fracture consolidation.

CONCLUSION

The surgical technique described is new and effective for treating atlas burst fractures. This posterior procedure allows mobility preservation, with a low morbidity rate.