Aging, hypertension, and renal damage: generalities and results of the Cardiovascular Study in the Elderly

Primary hypertension and nephropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The relationship between primary hypertension (formerly called essential hypertension) and hypertension-associated chronic kidney disease is complex and poorly understood. The strong association between hypertension-associated chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease supports the existence of common mediators. We will review data indicating common mediating mechanisms for cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease in primary hypertension.

RECENT FINDINGS

Chronic kidney disease develops in primary hypertension due to local and systemic inflammatory mediators that cause endothelial injury. This injury is an important early step in the development of hypertension-associated vasculopathy that causes nephron ischemia with nephrosclerosis. Similar mechanisms mediate endothelial injury in cardiovascular disease and its progression. Subjects with primary hypertension at increased risk for chronic kidney disease are at higher risk for cardiovascular disease, the major cause of mortality in primary hypertension.

SUMMARY

Primary hypertension is a modifiable risk factor for both cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. Better understanding of how primary hypertension leads to these outcomes might help in the development of pharmacologic strategies that retard and/or prevent chronic kidney disease in primary hypertension. Because of the strong association between cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease in primary hypertension, this improved understanding will likely lead to better therapies to hinder the development and/or progression of cardiovascular disease, in addition to its benefits in preventing hypertension-associated chronic kidney disease.

Causes and consequences of kidney loss in patients with nephrolithiasis

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether stone formers may safely donate a kidney. Nephrectomy could accelerate stone formation, or loss of filtration with age. We contrast, here, the course of stone patients with two versus one kidney.

METHODS

One hundred fifteen patients with a single functioning kidney were compared with 3151 patients with two kidneys. Cause of kidney loss was determined, along with stone types, rates of stone formation, urine stone risk factors, and creatinine clearance.

RESULTS

Women were 49.6% of the patients with kidney loss, compared to 33.6% of ordinary stone formers. Obstruction, stone burden, and infection were the most common reasons for kidney loss. We found an increased number of struvite and calcium phosphate stones among single kidney patients. Before and during treatment, single kidney patients had fewer stones than ordinary stone formers. Creatinine clearance was lower in the single kidney patients; rate of loss of kidney function with age was higher among single kidney males versus two kidney males if all patients are considered. Among males >age 45 years, the difference disappears. Females with one and two kidneys lost function with age at equivalent rates. Compared with nonstone formers, male stone formers lose kidney function with age at an accelerated rate.

CONCLUSION

Nephrectomy does not worsen stone disease. It may increase loss of renal function among younger males. The pattern of renal function loss with age differs between stone formers and nonstone formers.

Cardiovascular mortality in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. A controlled study among 683 diabetics and 683 age- and sex-matched normal subjects

Although non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is considered a major cause of death, the role of some independent risk factors in diabetic patients is under debate. In fact the prognosis of NIDDM diabetes varies considerably in relation to the individual risk pattern, and the different studies are not directly comparable because of differences in size, age and geography of the samples, and type of statistical analysis. The aim of the study is to identify the independent predictors of mortality in a cohort of subjects with NIDDM, and to verify whether the relative risk (RR) of cardiovascular mortality is different in comparison to that of coeval non-diabetic subjects from a general population. The study includes 683 patients with NIDDM from the Northern Italian town of Pordenone, followed up for 6 years and age- and sex-matched to 683 non-diabetic subjects from a Northern Italian general population. When the two cohorts were compared, NIDDM turned out to be a strong risk factor for cardiovascular mortality (RR: 2.67). Age, coronary artery disease (RR: 1.78), arterial hypertension (RR: 1.39), macro- (RR: 2.97) and microalbuminuria (RR: 2.01) were independent predictors of cardiovascular mortality in the diabetics. In conclusion, survival of diabetic patients is worse than that of non-diabetic coeval subjects. Only few items are able to predict cardiovascular mortality in the diabetics, namely age, hypertension, CAD, macro- and microalbuminuria.