Adjuvant radiotherapy and concomitant 5-fluorouracil by protracted venous infusion for resected pancreatic cancer

[Gastric cancer]

Radiochemotherapy Gatrointestinal intergroup study have demonstrated a convincing local control and overall survival benefit. Oncologists and GI workshops have in the present not had a major interest in the radiotherapy treatment of gastric cancer due to a number of factors. Primary because toxicities may be severe, second physicians may have low experience in definition of clinical target volume and in third perioperative chemotherapy is widely used in this indication. In Summary this issue should be used as guides for defining appropriate radiation planning treatment for the adjuvant postoperative therapy of gastric cancer.

Results and patterns of failure in patients treated with adjuvant combined chemoradiation therapy for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although adjuvant chemoradiation is used commonly in the United States for the treatment of resected pancreatic cancer, there is no consensus on the benefit of this therapy, because the results from randomized trials are conflicting. The authors of this report reviewed their experience in a consecutive, unselected series of patients who received adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and radiation therapy (RT) for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received adjuvant therapy from 1998 to 2005 were identified, and their medical records were reviewed. Ninety-three percent of patients were treated with external beam RT to > or =50.4 grays, and 91% of patients received concurrent 5-FU by continuous infusion. Forty-five percent of patients went on to receive adjuvant gemcitabine.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 31 months (range, 21-62 months) among the 20 patients who remained alive. Less than half of patients had positive (33%) or close (<1 mm; 15%) resection margins, 81% of tumors were classified as T3, and 66% of patients had involved lymph nodes. The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 22 months. Negative lymph node status (P = .016) was a significant prognostic factor for improved OS, whereas treatment with gemcitabine trended toward improved OS (P = .080). The median disease-free survival (DFS) for all patients was 10 months: Treatment with gemcitabine (P = .044) and the receipt of any chemotherapy (P = .047) were significant predictors of DFS. Seventy-five patients (87%) had disease recurrence, and the majority recurred with peritoneal metastases (55%) or liver metastases (53%). Patients who had negative lymph nodes trended toward a lower rate of distant failure (P = .060).

CONCLUSIONS

The median survival of the current cohort was greater than that of the chemoradiation arms of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trials and European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer 1 trials and was comparable to the survival observed on the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group chemoradiation arm. Lymph node status and treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy were significant predictors of OS and DFS, respectively. Future survival improvements should be directed at reducing peritoneal and liver metastases. Further randomized trials will be required to define the role of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Current state of adjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic carcinoma cannot generally be cured by surgery alone. This review summarizes the development of adjuvant therapy over the past two decades. Four randomized controlled trials compare long-term survival of different treatments. The small GITSG-study supports combined chemoradiation, but the EORTC-study found no significant effect. A Norwegian study of adjuvant chemotherapy found an increased median survival, but no effect beyond two years. The large ESPAC-1 study shows a benefit for 5-FU based chemotherapy, while chemoradiation had a negative effect. Thus, evidence favours adjuvant therapy, but 5-FU may not be the ultimate drug. Support for gemcitabine is given by preliminary data from a German randomized trial, and further American and European studies are upcoming. However, postoperative therapy is problematic, as 20-30% of resected patients never undergo treatment because of slow recovery or other reasons. Preoperative therapy has some theoretical advantages, and moreover, patients with rapidly progressive disease may be spared surgery. Randomized controlled trials are lacking, but published results compare well with postoperative, adjuvant therapy. The value of locally targeted therapy is difficult to assess. Reasonable results have been obtained with regional chemotherapy, whereas intraoperative radiotherapy does not seem to increase survival despite reducing reducing local recurrences.

Histopathological response to preoperative chemoradiation for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the French Phase II FFCD 9704-SFRO Trial

PURPOSE

This study suggests that pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a chemoradiosensitive tumor and that preoperative chemoradiation provides antitumoral effect associated with major histopathological response in 50% of patients and a high R0 resection rate. Evaluation of histopathological response to neoadjuvant therapy may serve as a surrogate marker for treatment efficacy and remains an active area of investigation.

OBJECTIVES

The chemoradiosensitive of pancreatic adenocarcinoma has not yet fully been assessed. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of preoperative chemoradiation, measured by the impact on the R0 resection rate and the histopathological response rate in patients presenting with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with localized, potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with 50 Gy irradiation combined with 5-fluorouracil by continuous infusion (300 mg . m(-2) . d(-1); day 1-5; week 1-5) and cisplatin (20 mg . m(-2) . d(-1); day 1-5 and day 29-33). Patients presenting with resectable disease at restaging, without metastatic dissemination, underwent surgical resection.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were enrolled. Twenty-seven patients (67.5%) completed chemoradiation receiving at least 75% prescribed chemotherapy dose without grade 4 nonhematological toxicity. Twenty-six patients (63%) underwent surgical resection with curative intent and 21 (80.7%) had R0 resection. Thirteen of 26 specimens (50%) presented a major pathologic response with more than 80% of severely degenerative cancer cells. Complete pathologic response was observed in one specimen. Median survival time and 2-year survival rate were 9.4 months and 20% for the entire cohort. The local recurrence and 2-year survival rates were 4% and 32%, respectively, for the 26 operated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that some pancreatic adenocarcinomas are chemoradiosensitive and that preoperative chemoradiation provides antitumoral effect associated with major histopathological response in 50% of patients and a high R0 resection rate. Further research is needed to determine the biologic difference between responders and nonresponders, to evaluate the predictive value of treatment response parameters, and to optimize the chemoradiation regimen.

The impact of resection margin status and postoperative CA19-9 levels on survival and patterns of recurrence after postoperative high-dose radiotherapy with 5-FU-based concurrent chemotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the impact of surgical margins and other clinicopathological data on treatment outcomes on 75 patients treated from 1999 to 2006 by initial potentially curative surgery (+/- intraoperative radiotherapy), followed by high-dose 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and concomitant fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All clinical and pathologic data on this patient cohort were analyzed by actuarial Kaplan-Meier survival methodology and by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards methods to measure effects on survival and patterns of failure.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 28 months, the median, 2-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 18.1 month, 41% and 23.6%, respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) rates were of 11.4 months, 35% and 20%, respectively. Only 2 clinicopathological features, positive (< or =1 mm) surgical margins (P < 0.05) and a 2-fold (>70 U/mL) elevation of the postoperative serum CA19-9 (P < 0.001) impacted OS and disease-free survival. In patients with negative (>1 mm) surgical margins and a low (< or =70 U/mL) postoperative CA19-9, the projected 2- and 5-year OS were 80% and 65%, respectively, compared with 40% and 10% with positive surgical margins and a low CA19-9 and to 10% and 0% with positive or negative surgical margins and a high (>70 U/mL) CA19-9. Positive surgical margins (P < 0.001) and an elevated postoperative CA19-9 (P < 0.001) also predicted early development of distant metastases, whereas isolated loco-regional failure was less common and not affected by these or other clinicopathological features.

CONCLUSIONS

Using this fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy regimen after surgical resection (+/- intraoperative radiotherapy), positive surgical margins and an elevated (2-fold) postoperative serum CA19-9 level predicted for reduced survival and early development of distant metastatic disease.

Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a critical appraisal

Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas carries a grim prognosis. Surgery is currently the only curative option, but even the few patients undergoing complete resection of early localised disease run a high risk for relapse and death. Although numerous clinical trials have been conducted during the past 20 years to find an effective adjuvant treatment, thus far no general consensus on the most appropriate regimen has been reached. In a small randomised study performed in the 1980s by the GITSG (Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group), encouraging results were obtained with fluorouracil (5-FU)-based split-course chemoradiotherapy, but these findings were not confirmed in a randomised study initiated some years later by the EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer). More recently, the ESPAC (European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer)-1 trial even indicated a detrimental effect of chemoradiotherapy, while chemotherapy with 5-FU was shown to have a significant positive impact on long-term survival. However, this latter finding is in contrast to earlier studies of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU combinations from Norway and Japan that did not suggest a prolonged beneficial effect of 5-FU on survival. Thus, the results for adjuvant regimens based on systemic 5-FU with or without external radiotherapy are conflicting. Clinical experience with intraoperative radiotherapy or regionally targeted chemotherapy to prevent local relapse, though encouraging, is still preliminary. More recently, gemcitabine, which is the most effective single agent in advanced pancreatic cancer, has also been evaluated in the adjuvant setting. The RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group)-9704 trial demonstrated that gemcitabine is superior to 5-FU as an addition to chemoradiotherapy, but the results did not allow conclusions about the value of radiation in the combined modality approach. The Charité Onkologie CONKO-001 is a randomised trial from Germany and Austria that compared adjuvant gemcitabine with observation alone. Gemcitabine was very well tolerated and almost doubled median disease-free survival and overall survival rate at 5 years, although the advantage in overall survival failed to reach statistical significance. In summary, the available data from randomised clinical trials of adjuvant therapy suggest that (i) chemoradiotherapy has no obvious advantage compared with chemotherapy alone; and (ii) chemotherapy with gemcitabine is effective and probably offers the best benefit-risk ratio of all currently available adjuvant treatment options.

The multidisciplinary management of gastrointestinal cancer. Pancreatic cancer: from pathogenesis to cure

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the USA. The disease has a high mortality rate and the 5-year survival rate is estimated to be 4%. Currently, surgical resection is only possible in 20% of patients; even then, the overall 5-year survival rate is only 25%. As such, surgical therapy alone is not sufficient for pancreatic carcinoma, and prospective investigation of additional modalities is crucial. Numerous negative trials have shown that chemotherapy alone is the standard of care after resection of pancreatic carcinoma. However, results remain poor and progress with new drugs is needed in this setting. For locally advanced disease, the situation is more complicated; the ideal chemoradiation schedule has not been clearly defined, and improvements could come in the near future from the use of new radiotherapy tools and targeted therapies. For advanced disease, chemotherapy alone has given very disappointing results. A multidisciplinary approach combining biological assessment of targets with clinical trials to evaluate new targeted drugs should be considered.

Adjuvant therapy for pancreas cancer: advances and controversies

Although the benefit of adjuvant therapy for pancreas cancer is clear, the most effective therapy remains elusive. In the United States, combination therapy with chemotherapy and radiation remains the standard of care, while in other parts of the world the contribution of radiation is questioned. Clinical trials are reported evaluating the benefit of post-resection radiation and chemotherapy with 5-fluoruoracil (5FU), gemcitabine, and combination therapy; chemotherapy alone with either 5FU or gemcitabine; and pre-resection chemotherapy and radiation. Attention to pancreas cancer staging, radiation techniques, and clinical trial design are paramount to interpreting the outcomes from adjuvant therapy. Therapeutic advances will be made with new approaches studied in carefully controlled trials.

The case for routine use of adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a poor prognosis for most patients. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment, providing the only realistic hope of long-term survival. Even with optimal surgical management, 5-year survival averages 15% to 20% for resectable disease. Progress is being made, however. Currently, the benefits of postoperative therapy for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma appear clear, and recommendations for such therapy appear to us to be well justified. Additional benefit to patients awaits the development of new agents, molecular targeted drugs, and novel approaches such as immunotherapy.

Adjuvant chemoradiation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: an expirence of single institute

Only a small percentage of patients with pancreatic cancer have limited disease suitable for curative resection. Even with surgery, patients often have poor long-term survival due to relapse of the disease. There are controversies about the adjuvant treatment of these patients. We reported the survival of resected pancreatic cancer from a single institute. About 128 consecutive patients who had complete resection of the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were evaluated, retrospectively. Chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy plus 5-fluorouracil) was given to 63 patients. Fifty-five patients declined to take chemoradiotherapy or with poor performance status were observed without additional treatment. Eight patients took only chemotherapy and two patients took only radiotherapy. The median survival of chemoradiotherapy group was significantly higher than the observation group (13 months vs. 4 months, respectively; P < 0.001). In multivariate analyses the most important factors improving survival were the application of chemoradiation (P < 0.001), low-level serum LDH (P = 0.026), good performance status (P = 0.033) and low serum CA19-9 (P = 0.037). Although adjuvant chemoradiotherapy has a significant survival benefit when compared with the observation group, the survival data are still poor for pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we need more effective additional or adjuvant treatment modalities.

Radiation Modifiers: Treatment Overview and Future Investigations

Many radiosensitizers are in current clinical use. In addition, a myriad of potential new targeted therapies, which may also interact with radiation, are in clinical development. The clinical utility of new targeted therapies, in combination with existing radiation sensitizers (chemotherapies) requires further evaluation, as does the understanding of their acute and late radiation effects. Free radical scavengers appear to show promise as radioprotectors, but data for mucoprotection are less convincing.

Emerging drugs in pancreatic cancer

Improving survival in patients with pancreatic cancer remains a formidable challenge. For the few patients with localised stages of the disease, intra-operative radiotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neo-adjuvant therapies remain non-validated and the survival benefit conferred by 5-fluorouracil-folinic acid adjuvant chemotherapy over radical surgery alone is still a matter of debate. Gemcitabine has recently emerged as the standard single agent in advanced stages of the disease and pharmacokinetic refinements such as the use of a fixed-dose infusion rate may further improve still rather modest result figures. At present, most efforts deal with the development of more effective doublet or triplet therapies, combining gemcitabine with either conventional cytotoxic drugs--the most promising being oxaliplatin--or more innovative, targeted therapeutic agents. Among these agents, matrix metalloprotease inhibitors and farnesyltransferase inhibitors have already undergone Phase III trials, alone or in combination with gemcitabine, with rather disappointing results. However, preclinical and Phase I and II studies of cyclooxygenase-2 or lipoxygenase inhibitors, various immunotherapeutic approaches and several tyrosine kinase inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies against growth factors or their receptors are encouraging and may provide some hope for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Final results of a prospective trial of a PEFG (Cisplatin, Epirubicin, 5-Fluorouracil, Gemcitabine) regimen followed by radiotherapy after curative surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Postoperative management of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) is controversial.

METHODS

The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility of postoperative combination chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in patients aged 18-70 years with a histological diagnosis of PA, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or =70. Cisplatin and epirubicin 40 mg/m2 on day 1, gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8, and 5-fluorouracil 200 mg/m2/day as protracted infusion (PEFG regimen) were delivered every 28 days for 4 cycles. Assuming a minimum one-year disease-free survival (DFS) of interest of 65% and a maximum of low interest of 45% (alpha 0.05; beta 0.10), the target enrollment was 51 patients, and the strategy would be considered to deserve further analysis if more than 29 patients were DF at one-year from surgery.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients, KPS >80: 29, median tumor size 3.5 cm, stage II/III/IVA: 2/34/13, grade 3-4: 22, positive resection margins: 26, node positive: 46, received 179 cycles of chemotherapy. Main grade 3/4 toxicity consisted of neutropenia (51%), thrombocytopenia (18%), and anemia (4%). One-year DFS was 67 +/- 7%. Two-year overall survival was 53 +/- 7%.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative management of PA with this multimodality strategy was well tolerated and yielded a promising outcome.

Prophylactic hepatic irradiation following curative resection of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

It is unlikely that adjuvant chemoradiotherapy applied to the pancreatic bed alone significantly improves the survival of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. The aim of the present study was to determine whether prophylactic hepatic irradiation (PHI) improved patient outcome after the curative resection of pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

The study population was comprised of 34 patients (PHI group) who were administered PHI after curative resection of pancreatic cancer between September 1994 and December 2003. The whole liver was irradiated with a total dose of 19.8-22.0 Gy under continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil. The cumulative rate of liver metastasis and the survival outcomes of the PHI group were compared with those of 31 patients without PHI (non-PHI group) who underwent curative resection of pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

The planned PHI was completed for 32 of the 34 patients. Two patients developed complications that might have been PHI-related. One developed liver abscesses which were successfully managed by percutaneous drainage. The other died of liver failure without recurrence 11 months after the operation. The cumulative incidence of liver metastasis was significantly lower for the PHI group than the non-PHI group (P=0.0455). Patients in the PHI group also survived significantly longer compared to those in the non-PHI group (P=0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings suggest that PHI is well tolerated and is a potentially effective treatment strategy after curative resection of pancreatic cancer, thereby providing the basis for a randomized controlled trial.

Clinical experience with chronomodulated infusional 5-fluorouracil chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate retrospectively the efficacy and chronic toxicities of concurrent radiotherapy and chronomodulated infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-eight patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated between January 1997 and May 2000 with 5-FU chronomodulated chemoradiotherapy. Chronomodulated delivery of chemotherapy was chosen on the basis of a lower toxicity profile in the treatment of GI malignancies. The median age was 64 years. Of the 28 patients, 12 were men and 16 were women. Eight patients had unresectable disease and 20 were treated after pancreatic resection. The median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy given in 28 fractions. The median field length and width was 10.6 cm and 10.9 cm, respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy with 5-FU was administered 5 d/wk, with a median total dose of 8.4 g/m2 (300 mg/m2/d). Chronomodulated 5-FU delivery consisted of a low basal infusion for 16 h followed by an 8-h escalating-deescalating infusion peaking at 10 pm. Survival and recurrence data were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier actuarial analysis. Toxicities were recorded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grading system.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for all patients was 26 months (range, 4-68 months). The median overall survival for the 20 patients treated postoperatively was 34 months, with a 3- and 5-year actuarial survival rate of 40% and 21%, respectively. If the 3 patients with carcinoma of the ampulla were removed from the data set, the mean overall survival in the resected patients was 34 months, with a 3-year and 5-year actuarial survival rate of 40% and 17%, respectively. The 8 unresectable patients had a median overall survival of 14 months, and none lived past 2 years. No patient experienced Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity or weight loss. Five patients had nausea and dehydration requiring i.v. fluids; only one (4%) was hospitalized. Four patients required a dose reduction of 5-FU, one for nausea, one for a transient ischemic attack, one for an infection, and one because of myocardial infarction. Seven resected patients, four of whom had no evidence of disease, developed diabetes mellitus 1-2 years after radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Chronomodulated 5-FU administration, based on the concept of chronotolerance, has relatively low acute toxicity. Our median survival rate was greater than that after most chemoradiotherapy programs that result in more acute toxicity. Additional study is warranted to evaluate chronomodulated radiosensitizing chemotherapy schedules in prospective trials and with attention to late effects after radiotherapy, including diabetes mellitus.

Conclusions from the European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer adjuvant trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains one of the most difficult cancers to treat. It is a tumor that tends to present late, and surgical resection is only possible in a minority of patients. After successful surgery, the prognosis is still relatively poor. Attempts at more radical pancreatic resections and extended lymphadenectomy, although feasible without excessive morbidity and mortality, have failed to produce any convincing improvement in survival. During the last few years, therefore, efforts have been directed toward the development of adjuvant therapies in an attempt to improve outcome. This article describes the main trials of adjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy with follow-on chemotherapy and presents the results of the European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC) 1 trial and the status of the ESPAC 2 and 3 trials.

Adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: an evolving paradigm

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of death in men and fifth in women in the United States. The median survival is 8 to 12 months for patients with locally advanced and unresectable disease and only 3 to 6 months for those with metastatic disease at presentation. Surgical resection offers the only potentially curative treatment. However, only 15% to 20% of patients present with tumors amenable to resection at initial diagnosis. Even for those who undergo resection, the prognosis remains poor. The 5-year survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy is only about 25% to 30% for node-negative tumors and 10% for node-positive tumors. Because of the dismal outcome for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, adjuvant therapy has been administered in an attempt to improve the local control and overall survival. This review highlights historic and current perspectives of adjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with tegafur in cancer of the pancreas: initial analysis of clinical tolerance and outcome

The early institutional experience in the neoadjuvant treatment of potentially resectable pancreatic carcinoma using oral Tegafur as radioenhancing agent is analyzed. Fifteen patients (10 male and 5 female, mean age of 61 years) were treated over a 30-month period. Tegafur dose was 1,200 mg/d along the external radiotherapy period (45-55 consecutive days). Preoperative radiotherapy achieved a total dose of 45 to 50 Gy (1.8 Gy/d). Intraoperative electron boost (10-15 Gy) was delivered at the time of surgery. Hematologic tolerance showed a significant decrease of neutrophil and platelet counts from the outset to the end of the neoadjuvant period (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). Five grade III vomiting episodes (33%) were also registered. In 9 patients (60%), surgical resection was performed after chemoradiation. Three complete pathologic responses (pT0 specimens) were identified; in seven cases, the resection achieved tumor-free surgical margins of the specimen. With a median follow-up of 21 months, median survival time was 17 months, with actuarial rates of 45% at 1 year and 24% at 3 years. Median survival for the resected patients was 23 months, and for the unresected patients median survival was 8 months (p = 0.02). The overall median survival in completely resected patients was 28 months, with a 71% survival rate at 1 and 3 years. It is concluded that the treatment scheme described is feasible and acceptably tolerated. The use of oral Tegafur seems to induce results similar to those of other therapeutic protocols using intravenous radioenhancing chemotherapy.

N/A

N/A

Four Decades of Continuing Innovation With Fluorouracil: Current and Future Approaches to Fluorouracil Chemoradiation Therapy

Purpose

Chemoradiotherapy, the combination of external radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy, has been the basis for the oncologic management of many patients since its development in the 1960s. Fluorouracil (FU) chemoradiotherapy has demonstrated success in several organ sites with multiple dosing schedules that now guide the selection of oral analogs of FU to provide new chemoradiotherapy options.

Methods

This article reviews the metabolism and pharmacology of FU and the advantages of administration of FU by continuous infusion or bolus. The potential role and impact of the oral fluorouracil prodrugs UFT, S-1, BOF-A2, and capecitabine as replacements for intravenous administration are discussed. The results of recent chemoradiotherapy studies with FU from 2000 to 2003 are summarized in rectal, head and neck, esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, biliary, anal, and cervical cancers.

Results

Chemoradiotherapy with FU has the potential to widen the therapeutic window by minimizing normal tissue toxicity while maintaining effective tumor toxicity. Overall, FU chemoradiotherapy maximizes local control and, for some tumor sites (such as head and neck, pancreatic, biliary, cervical, esophageal, and gastric cancers), improves survival rates. Moreover, FU chemoradiotherapy results in improved organ preservation with excellent functional outcome in several anatomic sites including head and neck cancer, anal, and rectal cancer, with improved sphincter preservation.

Conclusion

FU chemoradiotherapy continues to play an important role in the management of many cancer sites. During the last four decades, optimal dosing schedules have produced a therapeutic gain. The introduction of oral prodrug analogs will likely further improve the results of FU therapy in several organ systems, such as the rectum, head and neck, and esophagus.

Postoperative adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer

The majority of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer present at an advanced stage, and only a small percentage are considered technically resectable at diagnosis. The overall prognosis for the majority is dismal, with a median survival in untreated cases of only 24 weeks. Even in resected patients the overall 5-year survival rate is generally only 5% to 10%; however, some reports indicate higher 5-year survival rates in patients treated with surgery who are pathologically staged with no lymph node involvement. Even when macroscopically complete resection is achieved, local recurrence (LR) rates are unacceptably high (30% to 70%), which is usually attributed to the difficulty of obtaining microscopically free surgical margins. Microscopic clearance is difficult to achieve because these tumors frequently extend into the peripancreatic tissues (e.g., retropancreatic fat), abut or invade the adjacent large vessels (the portal vein and superior mesenteric artery), and have a propensity to invade the lymphovascular and perineural space. Other common sites of failure after attempted curative resection include metastasis to the liver and the peritoneal cavity. Patients who present with pancreatic cancer, and for whom curative surgery is deemed possible, are thus potential candidates for adjuvant therapy because of the high local failure rate following resection alone. The radiotherapy dose that can be achieved in the postoperative setting for pancreatic cancer is limited because of the proximity of critical structures (e.g., the kidney, liver, small intestines, stomach, and spinal cord). Newer techniques such as conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy have the advantage of being able (theoretically) to precisely localize the dose to the target volume while reducing the dose to critical structures. These techniques may potentially enable the tumorcidal dose to be increased; however, they are only now becoming widespread. Systemic radiation-sensitizing chemotherapy is also a promising approach to take advantage of additive or synergistic effects with radiation locally, and for the sterilization of systemic disease. This concept of concomitant chemotherapy with radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy, has proved effective in a number of sites, including the anal canal, rectum, lung, and pancreas. The recent trials reviewed here varied considerably in terms of the total dose and technique used, and the choice of radiation sensitizing treatment.

Old and new drugs in systemic therapy of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The incidence of pancreatic cancer nearly equals its death rate (97%). Two-year survival is about 10%. Chemotherapy treatment is problematic because of the palliative and limited duration of response.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The article analyzes the objective response and median survival time (MST) for old and new drugs in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

The most encouraging results to date come from studies of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) as an adjuvant therapy and of gemcitabine in the advanced disease, which is one of the most active and best tolerated drugs in recent years. However, with the introduction of new drugs or with different old drug associations, interesting results are also becoming evident.

CONCLUSIONS

New approaches to CT treatment are necessary. Patient enrollment into rigorous and well conducted clinical trials, either at tumor diagnosis or after tumor recurrence, will generate new information regarding investigational therapies and it will offer improved therapies for patients with this disease.

Estimation of an optimal radiotherapy utilization rate for gastrointestinal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy utilization rates for cancer vary widely, both within and between countries. The optimal proportion of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies who should receive at least one course of radiotherapy at some time during their illness is an important benchmark.

METHODS

The authors studied treatment guidelines and treatment reviews to identify the indications for radiotherapy for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Optimal radiotherapy utilization trees were constructed to show the clinical attributes of patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas who will benefit from radiotherapy. Epidemiologic incidence data for each of these clinical attributes were obtained to calculate the optimal proportion of all patients with gastrointestinal malignancies for whom radiotherapy was considered appropriate. Optimal rates of radiotherapy use were compared with actual rates in population-based studies to assess any discrepancies between actual and optimal radiotherapy utilization rates.

RESULTS

Radiotherapy was indicated in 80% of patients with esophageal carcinoma, 68% of patients with gastric carcinoma, 57% of patients with pancreatic carcinoma, 13% of patients with carcinoma of the gallbladder, 0% of patients with hepatic carcinoma, 14% of patients with colon carcinoma, and 61% of patients with rectal carcinoma. The actual radiotherapy utilization rates for most of these gastrointestinal malignancies fell well short of optimal rates, which were derived from evidence-based treatment guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to model optimal radiotherapy utilization using published treatment guidelines and existing incidence data. There was a discrepancy between the optimal and actual rates of radiotherapy utilization for patients with carcinomas of the esophagus, stomach, pancreas, and rectum. Strategies to implement evidence-based clinical guidelines are recommended.

Review article: chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a common, highly lethal disease that is rising in incidence. Chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been shown to prolong survival in advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine improves major symptoms and survival outcomes compared with bolus 5-FU. Many novel small molecules are being widely and actively researched. These compounds are based on classical mechanisms of action as well as biological therapies targeting novel cellular survival pathways, and include fluoropyrimidines, nucleoside cytidine analogues, platinum analogues, topoisomerase-inhibitors, antimicrotubule agents, proteasome inhibitors, vitamin D analogues, arachidonic acid pathway inhibitors, histone deacytylator inhibitors, farnesyltransferase inhibitors and epidermal growth factor receptor therapies. Adjuvant chemotherapy has also demonstrated the best survival outcomes following resection compared to other adjuvant or neo-adjuvant strategies such as radiation-based treatments. These benefits are superimposed on the dramatic increase in resectability rates and reduction in post-operative mortality achieved by centralisation of treatment in high-volume speciality centres. Newer 'small-molecule' drugs as well as the latest 'large-molecule' biological agents hold considerable promise for the future. Real advances are anticipated over the next five years but are dependent on large randomised controlled trials for success.

[Chemoradiation in pancreatic carcinoma]

Prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma remains poor, with one-year and five-year overall survival rates of 20 and 5% respectively. Only 5 to 15% of patients present with tumors amenable to resection. Long-term (5 years) survival after curative resection is less than 20%, and the median survival is about 12 months. This paper updates recent trends about concomitant chemoradiation. At first, a review of the studies on adjuvant chemoradiation after surgery is proposed. Then, indications of preoperative chemoradiation for patients with localized resectable adenocarcinoma are discussed. The last part concerns the most important and recent studies about chemoradiation in locally advanced pancreatic cancer, either with 5-fluoro-uracile or based on new drugs like gemcitabine.

Postoperative adjuvant gemcitabine and concurrent radiation after curative resection of pancreatic head carcinoma: a phase II study

PURPOSE

The addition of radiation to adjuvant 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of pancreatic cancer has not yet shown any definite benefit. Gemcitabine (GEM) has potential activity in advanced pancreatic cancer and is a powerful radiosensitizer. We evaluated the feasibility of postoperative administration of GEM alone, followed by concurrent GEM and irradiation (RT) after curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

GEM 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days for three courses was given within 8 weeks after surgery and was followed by GEM 300 mg/m(2) weekly +40 Gy in a split course. Twenty-two patients (median age 59 years, range 39-74, Performance Status 0-1) with Stage II and III curatively resected pancreatic head adenocarcinoma were included.

RESULTS

For GEM alone, all patients received the three planned courses, with dose reductions in 7 (32%) of 22 patients. All patients, except two, completed full chemoradiation; one received only 20 Gy because of both World Health Organization Grade 4 vomiting and thrombopenia and the other stopped RT after 32 Gy because of early disease progression. No reduction in GEM during RT was necessary; no toxic death was noted; and World Health Organization Grade 3-4 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities occurred in 8 (36%) and 7 (nausea, vomiting) (32%) of 22 patients respectively. No late toxicity developed. After a median follow-up of 15 months, 11 patients were alive, and 2 patients had died of causes unrelated to their disease or toxicity, The median disease-free survival and overall survival was 6 and 15 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This adjuvant regimen was well tolerated and can be easily administered after curative surgery for pancreatic cancer. Its intensification with continuous RT is currently being investigated.

Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: historical and current perspectives

The results from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma appear to be improving with increased resection rates and reduced postoperative mortality reported by specialist pancreatic cancer teams. Developments with medical oncological treatments have been difficult, however, due to the fundamentally aggressive biological nature of pancreatic cancer and its resistance to chemotherapy coupled with a relative dearth of randomised controlled trials. The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC)-1 trial recruited nearly 600 patients and is the largest trial in pancreatic cancer. The results demonstrated that the current best adjuvant treatment is chemotherapy using bolus 5-fluorouracil with folinic acid. The median survival of patients randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy was 15.5 months and is comparable with many other studies, but the median survival in the chemotherapy arm was 19.7 months and is as good or superior to multimodality treatments including intra-operative radiotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neo-adjuvant therapies. The use of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil with folinic acid may be supplanted by gemcitabine but requires confirmation by ongoing clinical trials, notably ESPAC-3, which plans to recruit 990 patients from Europe, Canada and Australasia. Major trials such as ESPAC-1 and ESPAC-3 have set new standards for the development of adjuvant treatment and it is now clear that such treatment in this field has the potential to significantly improve both patient survival and quality of life after curative resection.

[Chemoradiotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of gastric adenocarcinomas: real progress?]

Frequency of local and distant failures after gastrectomy has led to extended lymph nodes dissection to obtain a better locoregional control. However, five year survival rates were not significantly different between patients undergoing D2 and D1 lymphadenectomy, and higher morbidity and post operative deaths were reported in large randomised trials (respectively 25% vs 48% and 4 vs 13%). Additionally, several metanalysis failed to demonstrate a significant survival advantage with adjuvant chemotherapy. The results of the first trial demonstrating one advantage to adjuvant post-operative chemoradiotherapy should modify the standard care. Disease free and overall survival after surgery alone and after surgery and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were respectively 31% vs 48% and 41% vs 50%. The intergroup trial demonstrate that better local control improve survival if radiation fields include stamps, tumour bed, proximal nodal chains and nodes corresponding to D2 extended lymph nodes dissection. Treatment was feasible with few severe toxic effects (1%). Of the 281 patients, 17% stopped treatment because toxic effects. Technical modalities of radiotherapy and post-operative nutrition support, which are critical points of interest for this treatment, are also discussed.

Current and future strategies for combined-modality therapy in pancreatic cancer

Treatment of pancreatic cancer remains a challenging task that often requires a multidisciplinary approach to confer optimal response and, ideally, maximize survival. A combination of locoregional approaches such as surgery and radiotherapy, along with systemic therapies for eradication of micrometastases, should be considered both for patients who are operative candidates and for those with locally advanced, unresectable disease. How best to combine these modalities in terms of schedule, timing, and choice of agents is a question that continues to be actively investigated. Some of these data are equivocal or conflicting; thus standards of care for combined-modality treatment have not been uniformly accepted to date. This article provides an overview of combined-modality therapy, focusing on the major studies that have guided our current approach to the treatment of pancreatic cancer and examining new strategies that are likely to improve outcomes and survival for patients in the future.

The role of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer

Patients with pancreatic cancer have a very poor outlook. There have been major advances in the standard surgical treatment of this disease, resulting in decreased post-operative mortality and morbidity. The use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy has been developed to increase long-term patient survival following potentially curative resection. The standard chemotherapeutic agent is 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), although newer cytotoxic agents are in clinical trials for advanced cancer. Initial studies of adjuvant therapy have been based on small numbers of patients, but recently two large European randomised controlled trials of adjuvant therapy (EORTC and ESPAC-1) have been completed. These suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy has a significant survival advantage over resection alone but chemoradiotherapy does not. Promising new agents are being developed and tested mainly in clinical trials of advanced pancreatic cancer. The results of large-scale randomised controlled trials to assess adjuvant therapies for pancreatic cancer demonstrate the great surgical and oncological progress that has been made over the past decade.

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer remains uncertain. The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC) assessed the roles of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in a randomised study.

METHODS

After resection, patients were randomly assigned to adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (20 Gy in ten daily fractions over 2 weeks with 500 mg/m(2) fluorouracil intravenously on days 1-3, repeated after 2 weeks) or chemotherapy (intravenous fluorouracil 425 mg/m(2) and folinic acid 20 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days, monthly for 6 months). Clinicians could randomise patients into a two-by-two factorial design (observation, chemoradiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone, or both) or into one of the main treatment comparisons (chemoradiotherapy versus no chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy). The primary endpoint was death, and all analyses were by intention to treat. Findings 541 eligible patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were randomised: 285 in the two-by-two factorial design (70 chemoradiotherapy, 74 chemotherapy, 72 both, 69 observation); a further 68 patients were randomly assigned chemoradiotherapy or no chemoradiotherapy and 188 chemotherapy or no chemotherapy. Median follow-up of the 227 (42%) patients still alive was 10 months (range 0-62). Overall results showed no benefit for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (median survival 15.5 months in 175 patients with chemoradiotherapy vs 16.1 months in 178 patients without; hazard ratio 1.18 [95% CI 0.90-1.55], p=0.24). There was evidence of a survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy (median survival 19.7 months in 238 patients with chemotherapy vs 14.0 months in 235 patients without; hazard ratio 0.66 [0.52-0.83], p=0.0005). Interpretation This study showed no survival benefit for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy but revealed a potential benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy, justifying further randomised controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.

Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer

The outlook for patients with pancreatic cancer has been grim. There have been major advances in the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer, leading to a dramatic reduction in post-operative mortality from the development of high volume specialized centres. This stimulated the study of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments in pancreatic cancer including chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy. Initial protocols have been based on the original but rather small GITSG study first reported in 1985. There have been two large European trials totalling over 600 patients (EORTC and ESPAC-1) that do not support the use of chemoradiation as adjuvant therapy. A second major finding from the ESPAC-1 trial (541 patients randomized) was some but not conclusive evidence for a survival benefit associated with chemotherapy. A third major finding from the ESPAC-1 trial was that the quality of life was not affected by the use of adjuvant treatments compared to surgery alone. The ESPAC-3 trial aims to assess the definitive use of adjuvant chemotherapy in a randomized controlled trial of 990 patients.