Differentiation of atypical atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia from orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia using a septal accessory pathway by the response to ventricular pacing

A Single Atrial Extrastimulation Resetting His Bundle During Supraventricular Tachycardia to Differentiate Atrial Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation is the curative treatment for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). However, atrial tachycardia (AT) diagnosis is often challenging, especially when SVT is terminated by pacing.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to develop a novel method for AT diagnosis.

METHODS

A total of 147 SVTs including 28 ATs, 87 atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardias, and 32 orthodromic reciprocating tachycardias were prospectively studied. Single atrial extrastimulation was performed at the proximal coronary sinus from a coupling interval 20 milliseconds shorter than the tachycardia cycle length and gradually decreased until the His bundle (HB) was first reset and further until the SVT was terminated. The response of the SVT during the first HB resetting and the termination pattern were examined.

RESULTS

In 27 of 28 ATs, tachycardia was unaffected when HB resetting whereas, in atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardias or orthodromic reciprocating tachycardias (non-AT), tachycardia was simultaneously reset when HB resetting or was terminated with an atrio-Hisian block. When the coupling interval was further shortened for cases in which tachycardia persisted, all 33 SVTs with tachycardia termination with atrio-Hisian block were non-ATs, whereas 5 ATs and 7 non-ATs were terminated with Hisian-atrial block. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the pattern of tachycardia that was unaffected when HB resetting for AT diagnosis were 96%, 100%, 100%, and 99%, respectively. Those of the pattern of tachycardia termination with atrio-Hisian block for non-AT diagnosis were 92%, 100%, 100%, and 42%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Single atrial extrastimulation from the proximal coronary sinus during tachycardia was useful and effective for AT diagnosis.

Local VA index for the differential diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Differentiating between atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia utilizing a septal accessory pathway is a complex challenge.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the "local VA index," a straightforward method based on signals from the coronary sinus catheter, to distinguish between these arrhythmias during tachycardia and entrainment. The ventriculoatrial (VA) interval on the coronary sinus catheter is measured during tachycardia and entrainment, at the site of earliest atrial activity. The difference between these 2 situations defines the "local VA index." We also propose a mechanism to clarify the limitations of historical pacing maneuvers, such as postpacing interval minus tachycardia cycle length (PPI-TCL) and stimulus-atrial interval minus ventriculoatrial interval (SA-VA), by examining nodal decrement and intraventricular conduction delay.

METHODS

In a retrospective study of 75 patients referred for supraventricular tachycardia evaluation, 37 were diagnosed with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) with orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia, and 38 with AVNRT (27 typical, 11 atypical).

RESULTS

In comparison to AVRT patients, AVNRT patients exhibited longer PPI-TCL (176 ± 47 ms vs 113 ± 42 ms; P <.01) and SA-VA (138 ± 47 ms vs 64 ± 28 ms; P <.01). The AVRT group had mean local VA index of -1 ± 13 ms, whereas the AVNRT group had a significantly longer index of 91 ± 46 ms (P <.01). An optimal threshold for differentiation was a local VA index of 40 ms. Importantly, there was no significant correlation between pacing cycle length and nodal decrement as well as intraventricular delay related to pathway location. This interindividual variability might explain misleading interpretations of PPI-TCL and SA-VA.

CONCLUSION

This novel approach is advantageous because of its simplicity and effectiveness, requiring only 2 diagnostic catheters. A local VA interval difference <40 ms provides a clear distinction for AVRT.

A novel approach to typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with high-resolution mapping using the CARTO 3 cardiac mapping system

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that high-resolution activation mapping during sinus rhythm (SR) in Koch's triangle (KT) can be used to describe the most delayed atrial potential around the atrioventricular node and evaluated whether ablation targeting of this potential is safe and effective for the treatment of patients with typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, non-randomized, observational study using high-resolution activation mapping from the sinus node to KT with a PENTARAY or OCTARAY catheter using the CARTO 3 cardiac mapping system (Biosense Webster) during SR in 62 consecutive patients (22 men; age [mean ± standard deviation] = 55 ± 14 years) treated for typical AVNRT at our institution from August 2021 to March 2023.

RESULTS

In all cases, the most delayed atrial potential was observed near the His potential within KT. Ablation targeting of this potential helped successfully treat each case of AVNRT, with a junctional rhythm observed at the ablation site. Initial ablation was deemed successful in 55/62 patients (89%); in the remaining seven patients, lesion expansion resolved AVNRT. One procedural complication occurred, namely, a transient atrioventricular block lasting 45 s. One patient experienced a transient tachycardic episode by the 1-month follow-up, but no further episodes were noted up to the 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Activation mapping at KT during SR with the high-resolution CARTO system clearly revealed the most delayed atrial potential near the His potential within KT. Targeting this potential was a safe and effective treatment method for patients with typical AVNRT in our study.

Electrophysiologic diagnosis of narrow and wide complex tachyarrhythmias

Establishing the precise mechanism of cardiac arrhythmias in the electrophysiology laboratory is one of the main requisites for a successful and safe ablation. This article provides an organized approach to the differential diagnosis of narrow and wide complex tachycardias based on the analysis of electrical activation patterns, followed by specific pacing maneuvers in each case.

Cannon A wave validation as a diagnostic tool in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias

OBJECTIVE

The presence of cannon A waves, the so called "frog sign", has traditionally been considered diagnostic of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Nevertheless, it has never been systematically evaluated. The aim of this study is to assess the independent diagnostic utility of cannon A waves in the differential diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs).

METHODS

We prospectively included 100 patients who underwent an electrophysiology (EP) study for SVT. The right jugular venous pulse was recorded during the study. In 61 patients, invasive central venous pressure (CVP) was registered as well. CVP increase is thought to be related with the timing between atria and ventricle depolarization; two groups were prespecified, the short VA interval tachycardias (including typical AVNRT and atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) mediated by a septal accessory pathway) and the long VA interval tachycardias (including atypical AVNRT and AVRT mediated by a left free wall accessory pathway).

RESULTS

The relationship between cannon A waves and AVNRT did not reach the statistical significance (OR: 3.01; p = .058); On the other hand, it was clearly associated with the final diagnosis of a short VA interval tachycardia (OR: 10.21; p < .001). CVP increase showed an inversely proportional relationship with the VA interval during tachycardia (b = -.020; p < .001). CVP increase was larger in cases of AVNRT (4.0 mmHg vs. 1.2 mmHg; p < .001) and short VA interval tachycardias (3.9 mmHg vs. 1.2 mmHg; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The presence of cannon A waves is associated with the final diagnosis of short VA interval tachycardias.

Demonstration of differential ventricular overdrive pacing during long RP' supraventricular tachycardia

We described the differential ventricular overdrive pacing during long RP' supraventricular tachycardia and discussed about its response leading to the dianosis.

Discrepant results of the total pacing prematurity in orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia with right bundle branch block

The total pacing prematurity (TPP) is useful for distinguishing orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) from atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia, but it may not be effective in patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB). We faced this challenge in an elderly woman, as RBBB and a prolonged transseptal conduction made it difficult to diagnose the tachycardia using the TPP. It is important to consider the presence or absence of RBBB when evaluating the results of the TPP.

Identification of supraventricular tachycardia mechanisms with surface electrocardiograms using a convolutional neural network

Background

It remains difficult to definitively distinguish supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) mechanisms using a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) alone. Machine learning may identify visually imperceptible changes on 12-lead ECGs and may improve ability to determine SVT mechanisms.

Objective

We sought to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) that identifies the SVT mechanism according to the gold standard of SVT ablation and to compare CNN performance against experienced electrophysiologists among patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT), and atrial tachycardia (AT).

Methods

All patients with 12-lead surface ECG during sinus rhythm and SVT and had successful SVT ablation from 2013 to 2020 were included. A CNN was trained using data from 1505 surface ECGs that were split into 1287 training and 218 test ECG datasets. We compared the CNN performance against independent adjudication by 2 experienced cardiac electrophysiologists on the test dataset.

Results

Our dataset comprised 1505 ECGs (368 AVNRT, 304 AVRT, 95 AT, and 738 sinus rhythm) from 725 patients. The CNN areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for AVNRT, AVRT, and AT were 0.909, 0.867, and 0.817, respectively. When fixing the specificity of the CNN to the electrophysiologist adjudicators' specificity, the CNN identified all SVT classes with higher sensitivity: (1) AVNRT (91.7% vs 65.9%), (2) AVRT (78.4% vs 63.6%), and (3) AT (61.5% vs 50.0%).

Conclusion

A CNN can be trained to differentiate SVT mechanisms from surface 12-lead ECGs with high overall performance, achieving similar performance to experienced electrophysiologists at fixed specificities.

The Value of Programmed Ventricular Extrastimuli From the Right Ventricular Basal Septum During Supraventricular Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

The difference between the right ventricular (RV) apical stimulus-atrial electrogram (SA) interval during resetting of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) versus the ventriculoatrial (VA) interval during SVT (ΔSA-VA_apex) is an established technique for discerning SVT mechanisms but is limited by a significant diagnostic overlap.

OBJECTIVES

This study hypothesized that the difference between the RV SA interval during resetting of SVTs versus the VA interval during SVTs (ΔSA-VA) would yield a more robust differentiation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) when using the RV basal septal stimulation (ΔSA-VA_base) as compared to the RV apical stimulation (ΔSA-VA_apex). Moreover, it was predicted that the ΔSA-VA_base might distinguish septal from free wall accessory pathways (APs) effectively.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 105 patients with AVNRTs (age 48 ± 20 years, 44% male) and 130 with AVRTs (age 26 ± 18 years, 54% male) underwent programmed ventricular extrastimuli delivered from both the RV basal septum and RV apex. The ΔSA-VA values were compared between the 2 sites.

RESULTS

The ΔSA-VA_base was shorter than the ΔSA-VA_apex during AVRT (44 ± 30 ms vs 58 ± 29 ms; P < 0.001), and the opposite occurred during AVNRT (133 ± 31 ms vs 125 ± 25 ms; P = 0.03). A ΔSA-VA_base of ≧85 milliseconds had a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 96% for identifying AVNRT. Furthermore, a ΔSA-VA_base of 45-85 milliseconds identified AVRT with left free wall APs (sensitivity 86%, specificity 95%), 20-45 milliseconds for posterior septal APs (sensitivity 72%, specificity 96%), and <20 milliseconds for right free wall or anterior/mid septal APs (sensitivity 86%, specificity 98%).

CONCLUSIONS

The ΔSA-VA_base during programmed ventricular extrastimuli produced a robust differentiation between AVNRT and AVRT regardless of the AP location with ≧85 milliseconds as an excellent cutoff point. This straightforward technique further allowed localizing 4 general AP sites.

Variability of the VA interval at tachycardia induction: a simple method to differentiate orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia from atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND

The differential diagnosis between orthodromic atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT) and atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (aAVNRT) is sometimes challenging. We hypothesize that aAVNRTs have more variability in the retrograde conduction time at tachycardia onset than AVRTs.

METHODS

We aimed to assess the variability in retrograde conduction time at tachycardia onset in AVRT and aAVNRT and to propose a new diagnostic tool to differentiate these two arrhythmia mechanisms. We measured the VA interval of the first beats after tachycardia induction until it stabilized. The difference between the maximum and minimum VA intervals (∆VA) and the number of beats needed for the VA interval to stabilize was analyzed. Atrial tachycardias were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients with aAVNRT (n = 37) or AVRT (n = 64) were included. Six additional patients with decremental accessory pathway-mediated tachycardia (DAPT) were analyzed separately. All aAVNRTs had VA interval variability. The median ∆VA was 0 (0 - 5) ms in AVRTs vs 40 (21 - 55) ms in aAVNRTs (p < 0.001). The VA interval stabilized significantly earlier in AVRTs (median 1.5 [1 - 3] beats) than in aAVNRTs (5 [4 - 7] beats; p < 0.001). A ∆VA < 10 ms accurately differentiated AVRT from aAVNRT with 100% of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. The stabilization of the VA interval at < 3 beats of the tachycardia onset identified AVRT with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 64.1%, 94.6%, 95.3%, and 60.3%, respectively. A ∆VA < 20 ms yielded good diagnostic accuracy for DAPT.

CONCLUSIONS

A ∆VA < 10 ms is a simple and useful criterion that accurately distinguished AVRT from atypical AVNRT. Central panel: Scatter plot showing individual values of ∆VA in atypical AVNRT and AVRT. Left panel: induction of atypical AVNRT. The VA interval stabilizes at the 5th beat and the ∆VA is 62 ms (maximum VA interval: 172 ms - minimum VA interval: 110 ms). Right panel: induction of AVRT. The tachycardia has a fixed VA interval from the first beat. ∆VA is 0 ms.

Importance of the Activation Sequence of the His or Right Bundle for Diagnosis of Complex Tachycardia Circuits

In this review, we emphasize the unique value of recording the activation sequence of the His bundle or right bundle branch (RB) for diagnoses of various supraventricular and fascicular tachycardias. A close analysis of the His to RB (H-RB) activation sequence can help differentiate various forms of supraventricular tachycardias, namely atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia from concealed nodofascicular tachycardia, a common clinical dilemma. Furthermore, bundle branch reentry tachycardia and fascicular tachycardias often are included in the differential diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia with aberrancy, and the use of this technique can help the operator make the distinction between supraventricular tachycardias and these other forms of ventricular tachycardias using the His-Purkinje system. We show that this technique is enhanced by the use of multipolar catheters placed to span the proximal His to RB position to record the activation sequence between proximal His potential to the distal RB potential. This allows the operator to fully analyze the activation sequence in sinus rhythm as compared to that during tachycardia and may help target ablation of these arrhythmias. We argue that 3 patterns of H-RB activation are commonly identified-the anterograde H-RB pattern, the retrograde H-RB (right bundle to His bundle) pattern, and the chevron H-RB pattern (simultaneous proximal His and proximal RB activation)-and specific arrhythmias tend to be associated with specific H-RB activation sequences. We show that being able to record and categorize this H-RB relationship can be instrumental to the operator, along with standard pacing maneuvers, to make an arrhythmia diagnosis in complex tachycardia circuits. We highlight the importance of H-RB activation patterns in these complex tachycardias by means of case illustrations from our groups as well as from prior reports.

A Network-based Cardiac Electrophysiology Simulator with Realistic Signal Generation and Response to Pacing Maneuvers

Diagnosis and localization of cardiac arrhythmias, especially supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), by inspecting intracardiac signals and performing pacing maneuvers is the core of electrophysiology studies. Acquiring and maintaining complex skill sets can be facilitated by using simulators, allowing the operator to practice in a safe and controlled setting. An electrophysiology simulator should not only display arrhythmias but it has to respond to the user's arbitrary inputs. While, in principle, it is possible to model the heart using a detailed anatomical and cellular model, such a system would be unduly complex and computationally intensive. In this paper, we describe a freely available web-based electrophysiology simulator (http://svtsim.com), which is composed of a visualization/interface unit and a heart model based on a dynamical network. In the network, nodes represent the points of interest, such as the sinus and the atrioventricular nodes, and links model the conduction system and pathways. The dynamics are encoded explicitly in the state machines attached to the nodes and links. Simulated intracardiac signals and surface ECGs are generated from the internal state of the heart model. Reentrant tachycardias, especially various forms of SVT, can emerge in this system in response to the user's actions in the form of pacing maneuvers. Additionally, the resulting arrhythmias respond realistically to various inputs, such as overdrive pacing and delivery of extra stimuli, cardioversion, ablation, and infusion of medications. For nearly a decade, svtsim.com has been used successfully to train electrophysiology practitioners in many institutions. We will present our experience regarding best practices in designing and using electrophysiology simulators for training and testing. We will also discuss the current trends in clinical cardiac electrophysiology and the anticipated next generation electrophysiology simulators.

Limitations of ventricular pacing maneuvers to differentiate orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia from atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia

PURPOSE

Various ventricular pacing maneuvers have been developed to differentiate orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) from atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of ventricular pacing maneuvers in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AVNRT/ORT.

METHODS

Sixty patients with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) undergoing invasive EP study were included (ORT: 31, typical AVNRT: 18, atypical AVNRT: 11). Ventricular overdrive pacing (VOP) and resetting by premature ventricular stimulation (PVS) during SVT were analyzed by 3 independent observers blinded to the ultimate diagnosis. We determined intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for interobserver agreement and the diagnostic accuracy of consensual results.

RESULTS

Although specificity of all parameters was high (96-100%) for ORT, semi-quantitative parameters of VOP (requiring the recognition of specific ECG patterns) had lower interobserver reliability (ICC: 0.32-0.66) and sensitivity (16.1-77.4%). In contrast, most quantitative measurements of VOP and PVS showed good reproducibility (ICC: 0.93-0.95) and sensitivity (74.2-89.3%), but post-pacing interval after VOP needed correction with AV nodal conduction slowing. False negative results for diagnosing ORT were more common with left free wall vs. right free wall or septal, and slowly vs. fast-conducting septal APs. False positivity was only seen with a bystander, concealed nodo-fascicular/nodo-ventricular (NF/NV) AP in a case of AVNRT.

CONCLUSIONS

No single maneuver is 100% sensitive for ORT. Semi-quantitative features have limited reproducibility and all parameters can be misleading in the case of rate-dependent delay during VOP/PVS, ORT circuits remote from the pacing site, or a bystander, concealed NF/NV AP.

Outcomes of deep sedation for catheter ablation of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, with adaptive servo ventilation

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is an established treatment, but the effect of deep sedation on PSVT inducibility remains unclear.

AIM

We sought to examine PSVT inducibility and outcomes of catheter ablation under deep sedation using adaptive servo ventilation (ASV).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation for PSVT under deep sedation (Propofol + Dexmedetomidine) with use of ASV. Anesthetic depth was controlled with BIS™ monitoring, and phenylephrine was administered to prevent anesthesia-induced hypotension. PSVT induction was attempted in all patients using extrastimuli at baseline, and after isoproterenol (ISP) infusion when necessary.

RESULTS

PSVT was successfully induced in 145 of 147 patients, although ISP infusion was required in the majority (89%). The PSVT was atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in 77 (53%), atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) in 51 (35%), and atrial tachycardia (AT) in 17 (12%). A higher ISP dose was required for AT compared to other PSVT (AVNRT: 0.06 (IQR 0.03-0.06) vs AVRT: 0.03 (0.02-0.06) vs AT: 0.06 (0.03-0.12) mg/h, P = .013). More than half (51%) of the patients developed hypotension requiring phenylephrine; these patients were older. Acute success was obtained in 99% (patients with AVNRT had endpoints with single echo on ISP in 46%). Long-term success rate was 136 of 144 (94%) (AVNRT 96%, AVRT 92%, and AT 93%). There were no complications related to deep sedation.

CONCLUSIONS

Deep sedation with use of ASV is a feasible anesthesia strategy for catheter ablation of PSVT with good long-term outcome. PSVT remains inducible if ISP is used.

Novel Diagnostic Observations of Nodoventricular/Nodofascicular Pathway-Related Orthodromic Reciprocating Tachycardia Differentiating From Atrioventricular Nodal Re-Entrant Tachycardia

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the performance of current diagnostic criteria and identify additional electrophysiological features differentiating orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) with a concealed nodoventricular/nodofascicular (NV/NF) pathway from atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT).

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing sustained supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) despite the occurrence of ventriculoatrial block (VAB) is challenging.

METHODS

We analyzed electrograms of 25 sustained SVTs (9 NV/NF-ORTs [n = 7/2] and 16 AVNRTs) with VAB and 91 AVNRTs without VAB (for reference).

RESULTS

More than 1 SVT, each with a different ventriculoatrial interval, was commonly induced in AVNRT cases (75%) but not in NV/NF-ORT cases (0%; p = 0.0005). Wenckebach VAB was common in NV/NF-ORTs (78%), but VAB patterns varied in AVNRTs. The His-His interval transiently prolonged in the following beat after the VAB in most AVNRTs but rarely did in NV/NF-ORTs (79% vs. 22%; p = 0.01). NV/NF-ORT was diagnosed by His-refractory premature ventricular contractions (n = 5) and the findings during right ventricular overdrive pacing showing an uncorrected/corrected post-pacing interval (PPI)-tachycardia cycle length (TCL) ≤115/110 ms (n = 5/5), orthodromic His capture (n = 6), and V-V-A (ventricle-ventricle-atrial response) response (n = 3). A single form of induced SVT (positive predictive value [PPV]: 69%; negative predictive value [NPV]: 100%), Wenckebach VAB (PPV: 70%; NPV: 87%), stable His-His interval despite VAB (PPV: 70%; NPV: 85%), orthodromic His capture (PPV: 100%; NPV: 97%), and V-V-A response (PPV: 100%; NPV: 95%) characterized NV/NF-ORT, and a PPI-TCL of ≤125 ms (PPV: 100%; NPV: 100%) characterized NV-ORT.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction of a single SVT form, Wenckebach VAB, stable His-His interval despite VAB, orthodromic His capture, and V-V-A response appeared to discriminate NV/NF-ORT from AVNRT, with a PPI-TCL of ≤125 ms discriminating NV-ORT from NF-ORT and AVNRT.

Methodology of Typical Accessory Pathway Catheter Ablation

Accessory pathways are abnormal electrical conductions between the atrial and ventricular myocardium, bypassing the atrioventricular node and as such are an important substrate for arrhythmias. Ablation is a curative treatment and should always be offered to symptomatic patients and asymptomatic patients with high risk professions. Adequate knowledge and understanding of different mapping and ablation techniques is pivotal to achieve successful outcomes.

Electrophysiologic approach to diagnosis and ablation of patients with permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia associated with complex anatomy and/or physiology

INTRODUCTION

Permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia (PJRT) is a rare supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), typically involving a single decremental posteroseptal accessory pathway (AP).

METHODS

Four patients with long RP SVT underwent electrophysiology (EP) study and ablation. The cases were reviewed.

RESULTS

Case 1 recurred despite 3 prior ablations at the site of earliest retrograde atrial activation during orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT). Mapping during a repeat EP study demonstrated a prepotential in the coronary sinus (CS). Ablation over the earliest atrial activation in the CS resulted in dissociation of the potential from the atrium during sinus rhythm. The potential was traced back to the CS os and ablated. Case 2 underwent successful ablation at 6 o'clock on the mitral annulus (MA). ORT recurred and successful ablation was performed at 1 o'clock on the MA. Case 3 had tachycardia with variation in both V-A and A-H intervals which precluded the use of usual maneuvers so we used simultaneous atrial and ventricular pacing and introduced a premature atrial contraction with a closely coupled premature ventricular contraction. Case 4 had had two prior atrial fibrillation ablations with continued SVT over a decremental atrioventricular bypass tract that was successfully ablated at 5 o'clock on the tricuspid annulus. A second SVT consistent with a concealed nodoventricular pathway was successfully ablated at the right inferior extension of the AV nodal slow pathway.

CONCLUSION

We describe challenging cases of PJRT by virtue of complex anatomy, diagnostic features, and multiple arrhythmia mechanisms.

Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Ablation of Atrioventricular Node-dependent Long-R-P Tachycardias

Atrioventricular (AV) node–dependent long-R–P tachycardias are a unique group of supraventricular tachycardias that include atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), atypical AVNRT with a concealed bystander nodofascicular (NF)/nodoventricular (NV) accessory pathway inserting into the slow pathway of the AV node, the permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia, and orthodromic NF/NV reciprocating tachycardia. Here, we discuss the complex pathophysiology, diagnosis, and ablation of these intriguing arrhythmias.

Ablation of Supraventricular Tachycardias From Concealed Left-Sided Nodoventricular and Nodofascicular Accessory Pathways

Background:

Nodoventricular and nodofascicular accessory pathways (AP) are uncommon connections between the atrioventricular node and the fascicles or ventricles.

Methods:

Five patients with nodofascicular or nodoventricular tachycardia were studied.

Results:

We identified 5 patients with concealed, left-sided nodoventricular (n=4), and nodofascicular (n=1) AP. We proved the participation of AP in tachycardia by delivering His-synchronous premature ventricular contractions that either delayed the subsequent atrial electrogram or terminated the tachycardia (n=3), and by observing an increase in VA interval coincident with left bundle branch block (n=2). The APs were not atrioventricular pathways because the septal VA interval during tachycardia was <70 ms in 3, 1 had spontaneous atrioventricular dissociation, and in 1 the atria were dissociated from the circuit with atrial overdrive pacing. Entrainment from the right ventricle showed ventricular fusion in 4 out of 5 cases. A left-sided origin of the AP was suspected after failed ablation of the right inferior extension of atrioventricular node in 3 cases and by observing a VA increase with left bundle branch block in 2 cases. The nodofascicular and 3 of the nodoventricular AP were successfully ablated from within the proximal coronary sinus (CS) guided by recorded potentials at the roof of the CS, and 1 nodoventricular AP was ablated via a transseptal approach near the CS os.

Conclusions:

Left-sided nodofascicular and nodoventricular AP appear to connect the ventricles with the CS musculature in the region of the CS os. Mapping and successful ablation sites can be guided by recording potentials within or near the CS os.

A novel pacing maneuver to verify the postpacing interval minus the tachycardia cycle length while adjusting for decremental conduction: Using "dual-chamber entrainment" for improved supraventricular tachycardia discrimination

BACKGROUND

The postpacing interval (PPI) minus the tachycardia cycle length (TCL) is frequently used to investigate tachycardias. However, a variety of issues (eg, failure to entrain, decremental conduction, and oscillating TCLs) can make interpretation of the PPI-TCL challenging.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate a novel maneuver to confirm the PPI-TCL value without using either the ventricular PPI or the TCL interval and to assess the ability of this maneuver to identify decremental conduction and differentiate supraventricular tachycardias.

METHODS

We analyzed 77 intracardiac recordings from patients (age 25 ± 20 years; 40 female) who underwent catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) or orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) with a concealed pathway. We calculated the PPI-TCL, the AH-corrected PPI-TCL, and estimated the PPI-TCL using "dual-chamber entrainment" calculated as [PPIV - TCL = Stim(A→V) + Stim(V→A) - PPIA].

RESULTS

The PPI-TCL calculated by dual-chamber entrainment highly correlated with the observed and AH-corrected PPI-TCL (R2 = 0.79 and 0.96, respectively; P <.001]. A dual-chamber entrainment PPI-TCL value of 80 ms correctly differentiated all AVNRT from septal ORT cases, whereas the standard PPI-TCL and AH-corrected PPI-TCL methods were incorrect in 14% and 6% of cases, respectively. Dual-chamber entrainment identified 3 ± 10 ms of additional decremental conduction beyond AH prolongation, including 4 pathways with significant (>10 ms) decrement.

CONCLUSION

Dual-chamber entrainment estimates the PPI-TCL value without using either the ventricular PPI or the TCL interval. This maneuver adjusts for all decremental conduction, including within concealed pathways, where a dual-chamber entrainment PPI-TCL value >80 ms favors AVNRT over ORT. This maneuver can be used to verify the observed PPI-TCL value in challenging cases.

When and how does a single ventricular premature beat initiate and terminate supraventricular tachycardia?

BACKGROUND

The differential diagnosis of a supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is accomplished using a number of pacing maneuvers. The incidence and mechanism of a single ventricular premature beat (VPB) on initiation and termination of tachycardia were evaluated during programmed electrical stimulation (PES) of the heart in patients with the two most common regular SVTs: atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and orthodromic atrioventricular tachycardia (AVRT).

METHODS

Three hundred and thirty-seven consecutive patients aged above 18 years with an inducible sustained AVNRT or AVRT were prospectively enrolled. Patients with more than one tachyarrhythmia mechanism were excluded. Two hundred and seventeen patients (64.4%) had typical slow/fast AVNRT and 120 (35.6%) had an orthodromic AVRT using a rapidly conducting accessory pathway for V-A conduction. In this cross-sectional study, we specifically report the analysis of tachycardia induction and termination by a single VPB.

RESULTS

Tachycardia induction with a single VPB during sinus rhythm was seen in 7 of 120 AVRT and in only one of the 217 patients with AVNRT, (5.8% vs. 0.3%, p < 0.05). When a single VPB was delivered during basic ventricular pacing these values were 28% versus 4%, respectively, (p < 0.001). Termination of tachycardia by a single VPB was observed in nine (4.1%) patients with AVNRT and in 57 (47.5%) with AVRT (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Initiation of SVT by a single VPB during sinus rhythm was uncommon and favored AVRT. Termination of SVT by a single VPB was commonly seen in AVRT but rarely in AVNRT. These findings can be of help when interpreting a noninvasive arrhythmia event recording.

Shift in the retrograde atrial activation sequence after radiofrequency catheter ablation in left variant atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

The role of left AV nodal (SVN) connections in the genesis of "left-variant" atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and those with multiple retrograde pathways remain unclear. We describe an unusual case of "left-variant" atypical AVNRT, where change in the retrograde earliest atrial activation site (REAAS) at the coronary sinus (CS) following radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) was observed. Our observation suggests that the REAAS, that is, the left AVN connections, could participate in the formation of the reentrant circuit of "left-variant" atypical AVNRT. Furthermore, its atrial breakthroughs involved as a circuit of SVT could be (functionally) multiple.

Delta of the local ventriculo-atrial intervals at the septal location to differentiate tachycardia using septal accessory pathways from atypical atrioventricular nodal re-entry

Aims

Tachycardia mediated by septal accessory pathways (AP) and atypical atrioventricular nodal re-entry (AVNRT) require careful electrophysiologic evaluation for differential diagnosis. We aim to describe the differential behaviour of local ventriculo-atrial (VA) intervals which predicts the tachycardia mechanism.

Methods and results

The local VA intervals at the para-Hisian septum were measured under three different situations: (i) tachycardia; (ii) sustained entrainment from the right ventricular apex (RVA); and (iii) continuous pacing from the RVA during sinus rhythm. Differences were computed as follows: Δ-VAentr = VA during entrainment - VA during tachycardia; and Δ-VApac = VA while pacing during sinus rhythm - VA during tachycardia. In contrast to AVNRT, we hypothesized that an invariable retrograde conduction through the septal AP will keep the result of the subtractions close to 0 ms in cases of ortodromic atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia (AVRT). We analysed 55 atypical AVNRT (45% posterior type) and 82 AVRT (10 anteroseptal, 18 para-Hisian, 12 mid-septal, and 42 posteroseptal). Δ-VAentr was longer for AVNRT (98.5 ± 40.3 ms) compared with septal AP (-5.7 ± 19.3 ms; P < 0.001). A value of 50 ms showed 98.7% sensitivity and 92% specificity (AUC 0.99; 95% CI 0.98-1). According to physiological criteria, a negative Δ-VAentr remains unobserved in the case of AVNRT (positive predictive value 100% for septal AP). Δ-VApac was also longer for AVNRT (66.5 ± 14.6 ms) compared with septal AP (-9.7 ± 3.3 ms; P < 0.001). A value of 50 ms showed 100% sensitivity and 74% specificity (AUC 0.86; 95% CI 0.76-0.93).

Conclusions

Delta of the local VA intervals enables distinction between atypical AVNRT and AVRT mediated by septal AP.

Use of Programmed Ventricular Extrastimulus During Supraventricular Tachycardia to Differentiate Atrioventricular Nodal Re-Entrant Tachycardia From Atrioventricular Re-Entrant Tachycardia

OBJECTIVES

This study hypothesized that early coupled ventricular extrastimuli (V₂) stimulation might yield a more robust differentiation between atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia (AVRT).

BACKGROUND

Programmed V₂ during supraventricular tachycardia are useful to differentiate AVNRT from AVRT by subtracting the ventriculoatrial (VA) interval from the stimulus to atrial depolarization (stimulus atrial [SA]) interval, but all such maneuvers have limitations.

METHODS

Patients with either AVNRT or AVRT were investigated. The entire tachycardia cycle length (TCL) was scanned with V₂ delivered from the right ventricular apex. The SA-VA difference was calculated with V₂ clearly resetting the tachycardia. The prematurity of V₂ was calculated by dividing the coupling interval (CI) by the TCL.

RESULTS

A total of 210 patients (102 with AVNRT) were included. The SA-VA difference was >70 ms in all AVNRT patients and was <70 ms in all AVRT patients with right and septal accessory pathways (APs), except for those with decremental APs, in whom there was an overlap between AVNRT and AVRT with left APs. However, a SA-VA difference >110 ms with a CI/TCL of <65% distinguished AVNRT from AVRT using the left AP, with sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 100%, respectively. Ventricular overdrive pacing resulted in tachycardia termination or AV dissociation in 28% of patients compared with 15% of patients using the V₂ technique (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

A SA-VA of >70 ms using the V₂ technique differentiated AVNRT from AVRT using septal and right APs. Use of the V₂ technique with a short CI differentiated AVNRT from AVRT using left APs. The V₂ technique less frequently resulted in tachycardia termination compared with ventricular entrainment.

Differentiating Ventricular From Supraventricular Arrhythmias Using the Postpacing Interval After Failed Antitachycardia Pacing

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator arrhythmia discrimination algorithms often are unable to discriminate ventricular from supraventricular arrhythmias. We sought to evaluate whether the response to antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator could further discriminate ventricular from supraventricular arrhythmias in patients receiving ATP.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All episodes of ventricular or supraventricular tachycardia where ATP was delivered in patients enrolled in RAFT (Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy for Mild-to-Moderate Heart Failure Trial) were included. RAFT randomized 1798 patients with New York Heart Association class II/III heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30%, and QRS duration of ≥120 ms to a implantable cardioverter defibrillator±cardiac resynchronization therapy. The tachycardia cycle lengths (TCLs) before and after the delivery of ATP and the postpacing intervals were assessed. Overall, 10 916 ATP attempts were reviewed for 8150 tachycardia episodes in 924 patients. After excluding tachycardias where ATP terminated the episode or where the specific mechanism of the tachycardia was uncertain, we analyzed 3676 ATP attempts delivered for 2046 tachycardia episodes in 541 patients. A shorter difference between postpacing interval and TCL (PPI-TCL) was more likely to be associated with ventricular tachycardia than with supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (138.1±104.2 versus 277.4±126.9 ms; p<0.001). Analysis of the receiver operator curve for the PPI-TCL revealed an area under the curve of 0.803 (p<0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.784-0.822). The majority of tachycardias with a PPI-TCL >360 ms were supraventricular with a PPI-TCL value of ≤360 ms having a sensitivity of 97.4% and specificity of 28.3% for ventricular tachycardia.

CONCLUSIONS

The ATP response, specifically the PPI-TCL, can further discriminate ventricular from supraventricular arrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators when the currently available discriminators fail.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00251251.

Case report: an unstable wide QRS complexes tachycardia after ablation of a poster-septal accessory pathway: What is the mechanism?

INTRODUCTION

Differentiation of wide QRS complex tachycardia required repeated electrophysiological stimuli and mapping. However, instability of tachycardia would increase the difficulty in differential diagnosis.

SYMPTOMS AND CLINICAL FINDINGS

In this paper, we reported a wide QRS tachycardia following ablation of an atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia participated by a poster-septal accessory pathway. Limited differentiation strategy was performed because the wide QRS tachycardia was self-limited and with unstable hemodynamics. We analyzed the mechanism of the wide QRS tachycardia by only 4 beats ventricular overpacing. On the basis of the last ventricular pacing, an atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia was confirmed.

INTERVENTION AND OUTCOMES

After slow-pathway modification, the wide QRS tachycardia was eliminated.

CONCLUSION

It was an atypical atrial-ventricular node reentrant tachycardia with right bundle branch block. Reasonable analysis based on electrophysiological electrophysiologic knowledge was the basis of successful diagnosis and treatment.

A Simple Method to Differentiate Atrioventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia from Orthodromic Reciprocating Tachycardia

Discrimination between atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) and orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) during an electrophysiological study is sometimes challenging. This study aimed to investigate if the difference in the local VA (ventricle-atrium) interval during ventricular entrainment pacing and during tachycardia (DVA, defined as the shortest local VA interval of coronary sinus [CS] during entrainment minus the shortest local VA interval of CS during tachycardia) was different in patients with AVNRT and patients with ORT.Diagnoses of AVNRT or ORT through a concealed accessory pathway (AP) were made according to conventional electrophysiological criteria and ablation results. Entrainment by right ventricular (RV) pacing was performed in each patient before ablation and patients with successful entrainment were included in the study. The DVA was compared between patients with AVNRT and patients with ORT. The DVA in patients with AVNRT was significantly longer than that in patients with ORT (120 ± 20 versus 5.7 ± 9; P < 0.001). In each patient with AVNRT of slow-fast type, fast-slow type, and slow-slow type, the DVA was more than 48 ms. In each patient with ORT using a left free wall accessory pathway (AP), right free wall AP, and septal AP, the DVA was less than 20 ms.DVA was found to be a rapid, useful test in distinguishing patients with AVNRT from those with ORT.

An Uncommon Case of Incessant Tachycardia-induced Cardiomyopathy in a Child

The case of a pediatric patient with a history of incessant narrow complex tachycardia is presented. The patient underwent successful catheter ablation for an uncommon concealed slow accessory pathway. The mechanism and ablation location are discussed.

Clinical Features and Sites of Ablation for Patients With Incessant Supraventricular Tachycardia From Concealed Nodofascicular and Nodoventricular Tachycardias

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to describe the clinical features and sites of successful ablation for incessant nodofascicular (NF) and nodoventricular (NV) tachycardias.

BACKGROUND

Incessant supraventricular tachycardias have been associated with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathies and have been previously attributed to permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardias, atrial tachycardias, and atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardias. Incessant concealed NF and NV tachycardias have not been described previously.

METHODS

Three cases of incessant concealed NF and NV re-entrant tachycardias were identified from 2 centers.

RESULTS

The authors describe 3 cases with incessant supraventricular tachycardia resulting from NV (2 cases) and NF (1 case) pathways. Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia was excluded by His synchronous premature ventricular complexes that either delayed or terminated the tachycardia. Ventricular pacing showed constant and progressive fusion in cases 1 and 3. In 2 cases, there was spontaneous initiation with a 1:2 response (cases 1 and 3); the presence of retrograde longitudinal dissociation or marked decremental pathway conduction in cases 1 and 3 sustains these tachycardias. The NV pathway was successfully ablated in the slow pathway region in case 3 and at the right bundle branch in case 1. The NF pathway was successfully ablated within the proximal coronary sinus in case 2.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of incessant supraventricular tachycardia using concealed NF or NV pathways. These tachycardias demonstrated spontaneous initiation from sinus rhythm with a 1:2 response and retrograde longitudinal dissociation or marked decremental pathway conduction. Successful ablation was achieved at either right-sided sites or within the coronary sinus.

Analyses of the Mode of Termination During Diagnostic Ventricular Pacing to Differentiate the Mechanisms of Supraventricular Tachycardias

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to determine the diagnostic yield of analyzing the mode of termination during ventricular overdrive pacing (VOP) to differentiate the mechanisms of supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs).

BACKGROUND

The majority of the diagnostic criteria for VOP rely on successful entrainment, but termination of SVTs is common during VOP.

METHODS

We studied 225 SVTs with a 1:1 atrioventricular relationship, including 34 atrial tachycardias, 67 orthodromic reciprocating tachycardias (ORTs) (including 4 ORTs using accessory pathways [APs] with decremental properties), and 124 atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardias. The total pacing prematurity (TPP) needed to reset or terminate the SVT was calculated by using a simplified method, and the post-pacing interval minus the tachycardia cycle length (PPI - TCL) was predicted from the TPP.

RESULTS

VOP terminated 87 SVTs (39%). No atrial tachycardias were terminated by VOP in this study. SVT termination occurred after (n = 71) or before (n = 16) atrial resetting. The predicted PPI - TCL was highly correlated with the measured PPI - TCL (r = 0.96; p < 0.001). The TPP had diagnostic accuracy equivalent to the predicted PPI - TCL. The TPP was measurable irrespective of the termination mode and correctly diagnosed ORTs with decremental APs. All ORTs using septal APs and no atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardias had a TPP <125 ms. Considering other criteria evaluable in terminated SVTs, a combined criteria of a TPP <125 ms and atrial capture/termination within the fusion period were specific for ORTs using free-wall APs, except for left anterolateral/lateral sites.

CONCLUSIONS

The termination analyses were useful for differential diagnoses of SVTs terminated during VOP.