Risk of primary and recurrent acute myocardial infarction from lipoprotein(a) in men and women

Serum lipoprotein(a) level and clinical coronary stenosis progression in patients with myocardial infarction: re-revascularization rate is high in patients with high-Lp(a)

BACKGROUND

High serum lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels are associated with coronary artery disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The serum Lp(a) levels of 130 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent direct percutaneous coronary intervention were investigated. On the basis of Lp(a) level at 1 month after the onset of AMI, the patients were classified into 2 groups (high-Lp(a) (> or =30 mg/dl) and low-Lp(a) (< 30 mg/dl)) for evaluation of the clinical coronary stenosis progression (CCSP) rate. CCSP is defined as either target lesion revascularization (TLR) or new lesion revascularization (NLR). The CCSP rate was significantly higher in the high-Lp(a) group than in the low-Lp(a) group (65.8% vs 29.3%, p<0.01). In patients who had coronary stents in the acute phase (n=79), the CCSP and NLR rates were significantly higher in the high-Lp(a) group than in the low-Lp(a) group (45.0% vs 20.3%, p<0.05; 35.0% vs 6.8%, p<0.01), but there was no significant difference in TLR rate between the 2 groups (10.0% vs 13.6%, p=0.858).

CONCLUSIONS

High serum Lp(a) level is a significant risk factor for CCSP, but does not influence restenosis after stenting.

Plasma lipoprotein Lp(a), markers of haemostasis and inflammation, and risk and severity of coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND

Elevated plasma (Lp(a)) levels may represent an independent risk factor for atherothrombotic complications but the relation between Lp(a) levels and the extent of coronary artery disease (CHD) has been discussed controversially. Little is known about potential atherothrombogenic mechanisms of Lp(a).

DESIGN

Case-control study.

METHODS

We assessed the relationship between plasma Lp(a) and angiographically defined CHD, evaluating the severity of coronary atherosclerosis by three different scores. A total of 312 patients with stable angina aged 40-68 years with at least one coronary stenosis > 50% were studied. A group of 479 voluntary blood donors matched for age and sex served as controls. A complete lipid profile and a large number of markers of coagulation, fibrinolysis and inflammation were measured.

RESULTS

Plasma levels of Lp(a) were significantly higher in patients (14.8 mg/dl; 5.4-47.1 mg/dl; median/interquartile range) than in controls (9.7 mg/dl; 3.5-25.3) (P<0.0001). In a logistic regression model, the fully adjusted Odds Ratio for CHD was 3.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-5.6, P<0.0001) for patients in the upper quartile of the Lp(a) distribution compared to the bottom quartile. There was no appreciable association between Lp(a) and apolipoproteins, markers of haemostasis, fibrinolysis and inflammation and the severity of CHD.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that elevated plasma Lp(a) levels may be an independent risk factor for CHD but unrelated to the severity and extension of CHD. Furthermore, there is no good evidence that the presumed link between Lp(a) and CHD is mediated by increased levels of markers of inflammation, or interference with markers of fibrinolysis or coagulation.

Predictors of lipoprotein(a) levels in a European and South Asian population in the Newcastle Heart Project

BACKGROUND

Understanding of the higher susceptibility of South Asians to coronary heart disease is limited. One explanation is the combination of high prevalence of insulin resistance with higher lipoprotein(a) levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Lipoprotein(a) levels and genotypes in three South Asian groups aged 25-74 years (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi) were compared with a European population in a cross-sectional study. Biochemical measurements included lipids, apolipoprotein A1 and B, glucose, insulin and fibrinogen. Insulin sensitivity was calculated using the homoeostasis model assessment method (HOMA).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in lipoprotein(a) levels between South Asian and European men. South Asian women combined had higher lipoprotein(a) levels than European women, a difference probably resulting from higher lipoprotein(a) levels in Pakistani women compared with Indian and Bangladeshi women. Fasting insulin and HOMA were negatively associated with Lp(a) in South Asians though the associations were statistically significant only in men. There were only modest associations between most cardiovascular risk factors and Lp(a). Twenty-seven apolipoprotein(a) size alleles were detected in the three South Asian groups ranging from 16 to 43 kringle-IV repeats. The apolipoprotein(a) size polymorphism explained 23% of the variability in lipoprotein(a) levels in South Asians.

CONCLUSIONS

There were few nongenetic predictors of lipoprotein(a) levels in South Asians and Europeans. The lack of difference in Lp(a) between the South Asian and European men and the fact that differences between the women seemed to be confined to the Pakistani group offer little support to the hypothesis that higher Lp(a) levels contribute to the increased risk of heart disease in South Asians. Our findings do not support the hypothesis that susceptibility to heart disease in South Asians results from a combination of high insulin resistance and high Lp(a) levels.

Predictors of adverse long-term outcome in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: with special reference to the admission concentration of lipoprotein (a)

The predictive values for long-term outcome in 127 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after successful primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) were prospectively investigated in the present study. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal AMI, and recurrent angina. Follow-up angiography was performed in 120 patients to assess restenosis. The primary endpoint occurred in 21 patients during a follow-up period of 35+/-24 months. These patients had a higher lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentration (p=0.0105) and more prevalence of multivessel disease (p=0.0028) than the other patients. The subjects were divided into 2 groups at the 75th percentile Lp(a) value: group A had an Lp(a) concentration >or=47 mg/dl and group B <47 mg/dl. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a lower cardiac event-free survival rate in group A (p=0.0007) and in patients with multivessel disease (p=0.001). In Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, an Lp(a) level >or=47 mg/dl (relative risk[RR] 5.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-15.0, p=0.0007) and multivessel disease (RR 5.3, 95% CI 2.0-13.7, p=0.0006) were independent predictors of the primary endpoint. An elevated Lp(a) concentration on admission and multivessel disease are significant predictors for long-term adverse outcome in AMI patients treated by primary PTCA.

Levels of lipoprotein (a) in pulmonary arterial hypertension

We compared the levels of lipoprotein (a) in 48 Caucasian patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, comprising 32 females and 16 males, aged 28.0 +/- 12.0 years, with a range from 4 through 52 years, with 48 normal Caucasian subjects matched for age and sex. Pulmonary hypertension was secondary in 41 patients with Eisenmenger's syndrome, these comprising 27 females and 14 males aged 27.0 +/- 12.0 years, with a range from 4 through 51 years, and primary in the other 7 patients, 5 females and 2 males, whose age was 30.0 +/- 14.0 years, with a range from 9 through 52 years. Lipoprotein (a) was measured using an immunoprecipitation and turbidimetric assay after a 12 hour fast. Levels of the protein, expressed as the median (% 25; % 75), were higher in those with Eisenmenger's syndrome than in normal controls (p=0.003). In addition, there was a greater prevalence of levels of lipoprotein greater than 30.0 mg/dl in those with secondary pulmonary arterial hypertension patients than in our normal population (p = 0.03). We have found no differences, however, in the levels of lipoprotein(a) in those who had primary pulmonary arterial hypertension when compared with their matched controls, albeit that the number of patients studied was small. We conclude that increased levels of lipoprotein (a) may be secondary to pulmonary arterial hypertension as a marker of tissue damage or may be genetically determined. In either way, the increase in lipoprotein (a) could be an additional factor predisposing to the vascular alterations known to occur in this disease.

Prevention of coronary heart disease. Part II. Secondary prevention, detection of subclinical disease, and emerging risk factors

The prevention of CHD should be a major priority among primary care physicians and subspecialists who have any dealing with the cardiovascular system. There is ample evidence from epidemiologic studies for the impact of specific risk factors on CHD events. There is also ample evidence from observational studies and clinical trials that interventions of lifestyle and pharmacologic therapy can decrease morbidity and mortality from CHD before or after the first event. It behooves the physician who wishes to practice good medicine to understand the pathophysiologic roles of the risk factors and the evidence from epidemiologic studies and clinical trials for their association with cardiovascular disease. It is important to determine the efficacy of interventions, both lifestyle and pharmacologic, in modifying CHD risk. To be effective in doing so, the practicing physician has to have the motivation to determine target goals for risk factor modification in each patient, to understand the patient's own motivations in modifying risk factors, and to define clearly with the patient the expectations of such interventions. Although there are guidelines for risk factor modification in modification of cholesterol and in hypertension, the periodic renewal of these guidelines reflects the changing concepts of risk and its modification. A cardiovascular risk factor intervention categorization is presented in Table 12. The physician must be convinced that such intervention is beneficial to the patient, cost-effective, and thus fulfills the expectations of medical practice. The practice of medicine in the evaluation and treatment of coronary heart disease has always been challenging and stimulating. The prevention of CAD disease should ultimately provide the greatest accomplishment.

Lipoprotein(a) and coronary thrombosis and restenosis after stent placement

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the relation between high lipoprotein(a) levels and thrombotic and restenotic events after coronary stent implantation.

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) may promote atherogenesis, coronary thrombosis and restenosis after balloon angioplasty, but the clinical significance remains unclear.

METHODS

The study included 2,223 consecutive patients with successful coronary stent placement. According to the serum level of lipoprotein(a), patients were divided in two groups: 457 patients of the highest quintile formed the high lipoprotein(a) group, and 1,766 patients of the lower four quintiles formed the low lipoprotein(a) group. Primary end points were the incidence of angiographic restenosis at six months and the event-free survival at one year. Secondary end point was the incidence of angiographic stent occlusion.

RESULTS

Early stent occlusion occurred in four of the 457 patients (0.9%) with high and 37 of the 1,766 patients (2.1%) with low lipoprotein(a) levels, odds ratio of 0.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 1.16). Angiographic restenosis occurred in 173 of the 523 lesions (33.2%) in the high lipoprotein(a) group and 636 of the 1,943 lesions (32.7%) in the low lipoprotein(a) group, odds ratio of 1.02 (0.83 to 1.25). The probability of event-free survival was 73.0% in the high lipoprotein(a) group and 74.8% in the low lipoprotein(a) group (p = 0.45). On the basis of the findings in the low lipoprotein(a) group, the power of this study to detect a 25% increase in the incidence of restenosis and adverse events in the group with elevated lipoprotein(a) was 90% and 75%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated lipoprotein(a) levels did not influence the one-year clinical and angiographic outcome after stent placement. Thrombotic events and measures of restenosis were not adversely affected by the presence of high lipoprotein(a) levels.

Controlling blood lipids part 2: when and how to use medication

Drug treatment for abnormal blood lipids includes bile acid sequestrants, fibric acid derivatives, statins, and niacin. Statins generally offer the best combination of safety and effectiveness. Hormone replacement therapy reduces the risk of coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women. The National Cholesterol Education Program offers clear guidelines as to what levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) should trigger consideration of drug treatment, and the authors suggest what levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol should prompt treatment. Measurements of small dense LDL-C and lipoprotein(a) may also be helpful in decisions about drug treatment for selected patients.

Plasma lipoprotein(a) is not a predictor for restenosis after elective high-pressure coronary stenting

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) is a risk factor for coronary artery disease. Although it has been implicated in restenosis after balloon angioplasty, its role in restenosis within coronary stents is unknown. The aim of the study was to assess the role of plasma lipoprotein(a) as a predictor for restenosis after elective coronary stenting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Elective, high-pressure stenting of de novo lesions in native coronary arteries with Palmaz-Schatz stents was performed in 325 consecutive patients. Clinical, angiographic, and biochemical data were analyzed prospectively. Angiographic follow-up was performed at 6 months. Lipoprotein(a) levels were compared in patients with and without restenosis. Angiographic follow-up was obtained in 312 patients (96%); recurrence was observed in 67 patients (21.5%). No clinical or biochemical variable was associated with restenosis. Lipoprotein(a) level was 37.81+/-49. 01 mg/dL (median, 22 mg/dL; range, 3 to 262 mg/dL) in restenotic patients and 36.95+/-40.65 mg/dL (median, 22 mg/dL; range, 0 to 244 mg/dL) in nonrestenotic patients (P=NS). The correlations between percent diameter stenosis, minimum luminal diameter, and late loss at follow-up angiography and basal lipoprotein(a) plasma level after logarithmic transformation were 0.006, 0.002, and 0.0017, respectively. Multiple stents were associated with a higher incidence of restenosis (P=0.006), but biochemical data in these patients were similar to those treated with single stents.

CONCLUSIONS

The basal plasma level of lipoprotein(a) measured before the procedure is not a predictor for restenosis after elective high-pressure coronary stenting.

Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) is associated with coronary artery disease in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the relation between plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels, clinical variables and angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with chronic stable angina.

BACKGROUND

The relation between plasma Lp(a) levels and the severity and extent of angiographic CAD has not been studied in well characterized patients with stable angina pectoris.

METHODS

We investigated clinical variables, lipid variables and angiographic scores in 129 consecutive white patients (43 women) undergoing coronary angiography for chronic stable angina.

RESULTS

Plasma Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in patients with than in those without significant angiographic stenoses (> or =70%) (372 mg/liter [interquartile range 87 to 884] vs. 105 mg/liter [interquartile range 56 to 366], respectively, p=0.002). This difference remained significant when patients with mild or severe angiographic disease were compared with those with completely normal coronary arteries (312 mg/liter [interquartile range 64 to 864] vs. 116 mg/liter [interquartile range 63 to 366], respectively, p=0.02). However, subset analysis indicated that this difference achieved statistical significance only in women. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that Lp(a) concentration was independently predictive of significant angiographic stenoses (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 9.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0 to 42.1, p=0.006) and remained true even after exclusion of patients receiving lipid-lowering treatment (n=27) (OR 10.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 102.9, p=0.05). Lp(a) also had independent predictive value in a similar analysis using mild or severe angiographic disease as the outcome variable (OR 11.8, 95% CI 1.5 to 90.8, p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that elevated plasma Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for angiographic CAD in chronic stable angina and may have particular significance in women.