1
|
Bandeira‐Echtler E, Bergerhoff K, Richter B. Levothyroxine or minimally invasive therapies for benign thyroid nodules. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014:CD004098. [PMID: 24941398 PMCID: PMC9039971 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004098.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thyroid nodules (TN) are common in the adult population. Some physicians use suppressive levothyroxine (LT4) therapy to achieve a reduction in the number and volume of TN. In addition, minimally invasive treatments, such as percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) sclerotherapy, laser photocoagulation (LP), and microwave (MW), radiofrequency (RF) and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation, have been proposed, especially for pressure symptoms and cosmetic complaints, as an alternative to surgery. However, the risk to benefit ratio of all treatments for benign TN is currently unknown. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of LT4 or minimally invasive therapies (PEI, LP, and RF/HIFU/MW ablation) on benign TN. SEARCH METHODS We identified studies from computerised searches of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS (all performed up to April 2014). We also searched trial registers, examined reference lists of included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews, and contacted study authors. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies if they were RCTs of LT4, PEI, LP, RF, HIFU or MW therapy in participants with an established diagnosis of benign TN. We excluded trials investigating the prevention of recurrence of thyroid disease after surgery, irradiation or treatment with radioiodine. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data, assessed studies for risk of bias and evaluated overall study quality utilising the GRADE instrument. We assessed the statistical heterogeneity of included studies by visually inspecting forest plots and quantifying the diversity using the I² statistic. We synthesised data using random-effects model meta-analysis or descriptive analysis, as appropriate. MAIN RESULTS Thirty-one studies randomised 2952 outpatients to investigate the effects of different therapies on benign TN. Studies on LT4, PEI, LP and RF ablation therapy randomised 2083, 607, 192 and 70 participants, respectively. We found no RCTs of HIFU or MW ablation therapy in benign TN. The duration of treatment varied according to the applied therapies: up to five years for LT4 and one to three PEI ablations, one to three LP sessions and one or two RF sessions. Median follow-up was 12 months for LT4 and six months for minimally invasive therapies. Evidence was of low-to-moderate quality, and risk of performance and detection bias for subjective outcomes was high in most trials.No study evaluated all-cause mortality or health-related quality of life. Only one LT4 study provided some data on the development of thyroid cancer, reporting no abnormal cytological findings. One LP study provided limited information on costs of treatment.LT4 compared with no treatment or placebo was associated with a nodule volume reduction of 50% or more in 16% compared with 10% of participants after 6 to 24 months of follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 1.57 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 2.38); P = 0.03; 958 participants; 10 studies; moderate-quality evidence). Pressure symptoms or cosmetic complaints were not investigated in LT4 studies. LT4 therapy was generally well tolerated: three studies provided quantitative data on signs and symptoms of hyperthyroidism, which were observed in 25% of LT4-treated versus 7% of placebo-treated participants at 12 to 18 months of follow-up (269 participants; 3 trials; low-quality evidence).PEI compared with cyst aspiration only was associated with a nodule volume reduction of 50% or more in 83% compared with 44% of participants after 1 to 24 months of follow-up (RR 1.83 (95% CI 1.32 to 2.54); P = 0.0003; 105 participants; 3 studies; low-quality evidence). Improvements in neck compression symptoms after 6 to 12 months of follow-up were seen in 78% of participants receiving PEI versus 38% of those in comparator groups. No reliable summary effect estimate could be established, RR ranged from 1.0 to 3.06 in favour of PEI (370 participants; 3 trials; low-quality evidence). In all trials, participants experienced periprocedural cervical tenderness and light-to-moderate pain usually lasting from minutes to several hours. As a result of the PEI procedure, 26% of participants reported slight-to-moderate pain compared with 12% of those receiving cyst aspiration only (RR 1.78 (95% CI 0.62 to 5.12); P = 0.28; 104 participants; 3 studies; low-quality evidence).One study comparing LP with LT4 showed a nodule volume reduction of 50% or more in favour of LP after 12 months of follow-up in 33% of LP participants versus 0% of LT4 participants, respectively (62 participants; 1 trial; low-quality evidence). A total of 82% of LP-treated versus 0% of untreated participants showed improvements in pressure symptoms after 6 to 12 months of follow-up (RR 26.65 (95% CI 5.47 to 129.72); P < 0.0001; 92 participants; 3 trials; low-quality evidence). Around 20% of LP-treated participants reported light-to-moderate cervical pain lasting 48 hours or more (97 participants; 3 trials; low-quality evidence).One trial with 40 participants, comparing RF with no treatment, resulted in a mean nodule volume reduction of 76% in the RF group compared with 0% of those in the no-treatment group at six months of follow-up (low-quality evidence). These RF-treated participants had fewer pressure symptoms and cosmetic complaints after 12 months of follow-up compared with untreated participants (a 2.8 decrease versus a 1.1 increase on a six-point scale, respectively, with higher values indicating more severe symptoms; low-quality evidence). All participants complained of pain and discomfort during RF, which disappeared when the energy was reduced or turned off (low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS No study evaluated all-cause mortality, health-related quality of life or provided systematic data on the development of thyroid cancer. Longest follow-up was five years and median follow-up was 12 months. Nodule volume reductions were achieved by PEI, LP and RF, and to a lesser extent, by LT4. However, the clinical relevance of this outcome measure is doubtful. PEI, LP and RF led to improvements in pressure symptoms and cosmetic complaints. Adverse events such as light-to-moderate periprocedural pain were seen after PEI, LP and RF. Future studies should focus on patient-important outcome measures, especially health-related quality of life, and compare minimally invasive procedures with surgery. RCTs with follow-up periods of several years and good-quality observational studies are needed to provide evidence on the development of thyroid cancer, all-cause mortality and long-term adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Bandeira‐Echtler
- Universitaetsklinikum Duesseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine UniversityInstitute of General PracticeMoorenstr. 5DuesseldorfGermany40225
| | - Karla Bergerhoff
- Universitaetsklinikum Duesseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine UniversityInstitute of General PracticeMoorenstr. 5DuesseldorfGermany40225
| | - Bernd Richter
- Universitaetsklinikum Duesseldorf, Heinrich‐Heine UniversityInstitute of General PracticeMoorenstr. 5DuesseldorfGermany40225
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Thyroid hormone deficiency can have important repercussions. Treatment with thyroid hormone in replacement doses is essential in patients with hypothyroidism. In this review, we critically discuss the thyroid hormone formulations that are available and approaches to correct replacement therapy with thyroid hormone in primary and central hypothyroidism in different periods of life such as pregnancy, birth, infancy, childhood, and adolescence as well as in adult patients, the elderly, and in patients with comorbidities. Despite the frequent and long term use of l-T4, several studies have documented frequent under- and overtreatment during replacement therapy in hypothyroid patients. We assess the factors determining l-T4 requirements (sex, age, gender, menstrual status, body weight, and lean body mass), the major causes of failure to achieve optimal serum TSH levels in undertreated patients (poor patient compliance, timing of l-T4 administration, interferences with absorption, gastrointestinal diseases, and drugs), and the adverse consequences of unintentional TSH suppression in overtreated patients. Opinions differ regarding the treatment of mild thyroid hormone deficiency, and we examine the recent evidence favoring treatment of this condition. New data suggesting that combined therapy with T3 and T4 could be indicated in some patients with hypothyroidism are assessed, and the indications for TSH suppression with l-T4 in patients with euthyroid multinodular goiter and in those with differentiated thyroid cancer are reviewed. Lastly, we address the potential use of thyroid hormones or their analogs in obese patients and in severe cardiac diseases, dyslipidemia, and nonthyroidal illnesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernadette Biondi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery (B.B.), University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; and Washington Hospital Center (L.W.), Washington, D.C. 20010
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grussendorf M, Reiners C, Paschke R, Wegscheider K. Reduction of thyroid nodule volume by levothyroxine and iodine alone and in combination: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96:2786-95. [PMID: 21715542 PMCID: PMC3206705 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-0356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Nodular goiter is common worldwide, but there is still debate over the medical treatment. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was the measurement of the effect of a treatment with (nonsuppressive) T(4), iodine, or a combination of both compared with placebo on volume of thyroid nodules and thyroid. DESIGN This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial in patients with nodular goiter in Germany [LISA (Levothyroxin und Iodid in der Strumatherapie Als Mono-oder Kombinationstherapie) trial]. SETTING The study was conducted in outpatient clinics in university hospitals and regional hospitals and private practices. PARTICIPANTS One thousand twenty-four consecutively screened and centrally randomized euthyroid patients aged 18-65 yr with one or more thyroid nodules (minimal diameter 10 mm) participated in the study. INTERVENTION Intervention included placebo, iodine (I), T(4), or T(4)+I for 1 yr. T(4) doses were adapted for a TSH target range of 0.2-0.8 mU/liter. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary end point was percent volume reduction of all nodules measured by ultrasound, and the main secondary end point was a change in goiter volume. RESULTS Nodule volume reductions were -17.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) -24.8/-9.0%, P < 0.001] in the T(4)+I group, -7.3% (95% CI -15.0/+1.2%, P = 0.201) in the T(4) group, and -4.0% (95% CI -11.4/+4.2%, P = 0.328) in the I group as compared with placebo. In direct comparison, the T(4)+I therapy was significantly superior to T(4) (P = 0.018) or I (P = 0.003). Thyroid volume reductions were -7.9% (95% CI -11.8/-3.9%, P < 0.001), -5.2% (95% CI -8.7/-1.6%, P = 0.024) and -2.5% (95% CI -6.2/+1.4%, P = 0.207), respectively. The T(4)+I therapy was significantly superior to I (P = 0.034) but not to T(4) (P = 0.190). CONCLUSION In a region with a sufficient iodine supply, a 1-yr therapy with a combination of I and T(4) with incomplete suppression of thyrotropin reduced thyroid nodule volume further than either component alone or placebo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Grussendorf
- Endokrinologie und Diabetologie im Zentrum, Sophienstrasse 40, D-70178 Stuttgart, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wémeau JL, Sadoul JL, d'Herbomez M, Monpeyssen H, Tramalloni J, Leteurtre E, Borson-Chazot F, Caron P, Carnaille B, Léger J, Do C, Klein M, Raingeard I, Desailloud R, Leenhardt L. Guidelines of the French society of endocrinology for the management of thyroid nodules. ANNALES D'ENDOCRINOLOGIE 2011; 72:251-281. [PMID: 21782154 DOI: 10.1016/j.ando.2011.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2011] [Accepted: 05/13/2011] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
The present document is a follow-up of the clinical practice guidelines of the French Society of Endocrinology, which were established for the use of its members and made available to scientific communities and physicians. Based on a critical analysis of data from the literature, consensuses and guidelines that have already been published internationally, it constitutes an update of the report on the diagnostic management of thyroid nodules that was proposed in France, in 1995, under the auspices of the French National Agency for Medical Evaluation (l'Agence nationale d'évaluation médicale). The current guidelines were deliberated beforehand by a number of physicians that are recognised for their expertise on the subject, coming from the specialities of endocrinology (the French Thyroid Research Group) and surgery (the French Association for Endocrine Surgery), as well as representatives from the fields of biology, ultrasonography, cytology and nuclear medicine. The guidelines were presented and submitted for the opinion of the members of the Society at its annual conference, which was held in Nice from 7-10 October 2009. The amended document was posted on the website of the Society and benefited from additional remarks of its members. The final version that is presented here was not subjected to methodological validation. It does not claim to be universal in its scope and will need to be revised in concert with progress made in technical and developmental concepts. It constitutes a document that the Society deems useful for distribution concerning the management of thyroid nodules, which is current, efficient and cost effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-L Wémeau
- Hôpital Claude-Huriez, clinique endocrinologique, CHRU, 59037 Lille cedex, France.
| | - J-L Sadoul
- Endocrinologie, hôpital de l'Archet, CHU 06202 Nice cedex, France
| | - M d'Herbomez
- Département de médecine nucléaire, centre de biologie pathologie, centre hospitalier régional, 59037 Lille cedex, France
| | - H Monpeyssen
- Centre de radiologie, imagerie médicale et échographie thyroïdienne, hôpital Necker, 141, rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France
| | - J Tramalloni
- Centre de radiologie, imagerie médicale et échographie thyroïdienne, hôpital Necker, 141, rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France
| | - E Leteurtre
- Inserm U560, service d'anatomie pathologique, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France
| | - F Borson-Chazot
- Hôpital Louis-Pradel, CHU des hospices civils de Lyon, 28, avenue Doyen-Lépine, 69500 Bron, France
| | - P Caron
- CHU Larrey, avenue du Jean-Poulhès, 31400 Toulouse, France
| | - B Carnaille
- Hôpital Claude-Huriez, clinique endocrinologique, CHRU, 59037 Lille cedex, France
| | - J Léger
- Service d'endocrinologie et diabétologie pédiatriques, hôpital Robert-Debré, 48, boulevard Sérurier, 75935 Paris cedex 19, France
| | - C Do
- Hôpital Claude-Huriez, clinique endocrinologique, CHRU, 59037 Lille cedex, France
| | - M Klein
- Service d'endocrinologie, CHU de Nancy, rue du Morvan, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - I Raingeard
- Service des maladies métaboliques et endrocriennes, hôpital Lapeyronie, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France
| | - R Desailloud
- Service d'endocrinologie, diabétologie et nutrition, hôpital Sud, CHU d'Amiens, avenue René-Laënnec, 80054 Amiens, France
| | - L Leenhardt
- Service de médecine nucléaire, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, université Paris VI, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris cedex 13, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Paschke R, Hegedüs L, Alexander E, Valcavi R, Papini E, Gharib H. Thyroid nodule guidelines: agreement, disagreement and need for future research. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2011; 7:354-61. [PMID: 21364517 DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
This article reviews agreement, disagreement and need for future research of the thyroid nodule guidelines published by the British Thyroid Association, National Cancer Institute, American Thyroid Association and the joint, transatlantic effort of three large societies, the American Society of Clinical Endocrinologists, Associazione Medici Endocrinologi and the European Thyroid Association, published in 2010. Consensus exists for most topics in the various guidelines. A few areas of disagreement, such as the use of scintigraphy, are mostly due to differences in disease prevalence in different countries. Most of the discordance, for example, on the use of calcitonin screening or fine-needle aspiration cytology classification, could probably be resolved by further expert discussions, as the basis is the same published evidence. Importantly, owing to a current lack of evidence in many areas, clinically very relevant areas of uncertainty need to be addressed by further research. This situation applies, for instance, to better definition of ultrasound malignancy criteria and the evaluation of emerging new diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, including molecular markers. For clinicians who advise individual patients, these areas of uncertainty can currently only be resolved by sound management on the basis of clinical judgment, experience and patient preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf Paschke
- Klinik für Endokrinologie und Nephrologie, Universität Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany. ralf.paschke@ medizin.uni-leipzig.de
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yousef A, Clark J, Doi SAR. Thyroxine suppression therapy for benign, non-functioning solitary thyroid nodules: a quality-effects meta-analysis. Clin Med Res 2010; 8:150-8. [PMID: 20739581 PMCID: PMC3006560 DOI: 10.3121/cmr.2010.881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Levothyroxine (LT4) suppressive therapy for solitary thyroid nodules is not popularly advocated presently because its clinical efficacy and safety are currently considered controversial. This meta-analysis aims to address efficacy issues by using rigorous methods to arrive at a pooled estimate. On the basis of the analysis, it is estimated that LT4 therapy is clearly associated with up to a two-fold increase in the chance of nodule reduction. This translates to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 6 or a 50% decrease in the risk of cancer given nodule reduction. Keeping this definition of efficacy in mind and a low incidence of adverse events with low level LT4 suppression, such an intervention might be appropriate in patients selected on the basis of a low risk for adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Altayyeb Yousef
- Department of Medicine, Mubarak Al-Kabeer Teaching Hospital, Kuwait
| | - Justin Clark
- Herston Health Sciences Library, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Suhail A. R. Doi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fast S, Bonnema SJ, Hegedüs L. The majority of Danish nontoxic goitre patients are ineligible for Levothyroxine suppressive therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2008; 69:653-8. [PMID: 18363890 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03241.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Levothyroxine suppressive therapy (LT4-therapy), aimed at shrinking thyroid nodules is controversial. Despite evidence of limited effect and long-term side-effects, questionnaire surveys indicate widespread use. Our aim was to determine, in consecutive nontoxic goitre patients, the proportion ineligible for LT4-therapy. Exclusion criteria were set up in agreement with recent guidelines. SETTING Secondary/tertiary referral centre at University Clinic. SUBJECTS AND METHODS During 1997-2001, 822 patients were referred to our endocrine unit on suspicion of nontoxic goitre. Patients were evaluated clinically including fine needle aspiration biopsy, thyroid scintigraphy and ultrasound. Seven-hundred and forty-five patients (627 women and 118 men; median age 47 years, range 11-90) were potential candidates for LT4-therapy. Based on guidelines we defined conditions where LT4-therapy is contraindicated. Exclusion criteria included (1) Serum TSH < 1.0 mIU/l, (2) Post-menopausal status, or males older than 60 years, (3) Thyroid volume above 100 ml, (4) Intrathoracic goitre, (5) Clinical suspicion of malignancy, (6) Dominant thyroid cyst, (7) Nondiagnostic FNA, (8) Previous ineffective LT4-therapy, (9) Elevated serum calcitonin, (10) Osteoporosis or cardiovascular disease. RESULTS Of patients 84% were ineligible for LT4-therapy. In diffuse goitre (n = 35) 63%, in uninodular goitre (n = 320) 77% and in multinodular goitre (n = 390) 91% were ineligible. Main ineligibility reasons were a low serum TSH, post-menopausal status, a large goitre or clinical suspicion of malignancy. CONCLUSION The vast majority of consecutive Danish nontoxic goitre patients (84%) were ineligible for LT4-therapy. Due to low efficacy and potential long-term adverse effects on the skeleton and cardiovascular system we strongly advocate against LT4-therapy for nontoxic goitre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Søren Fast
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brauer VFH, Eder P, Miehle K, Wiesner TD, Hasenclever H, Paschke R. Interobserver variation for ultrasound determination of thyroid nodule volumes. Thyroid 2005; 15:1169-75. [PMID: 16279851 DOI: 10.1089/thy.2005.15.1169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Thyroid ultrasound is used in the routine clinical assessment and the follow-up of thyroid disorders. The follow- up of patients with thyroid nodules is mostly based on thyroid nodule volume determinations performed by different observers. However, for the judgment of treatment effects there is uncertainty about the interobserver variation of thyroid nodule volume measurements by ultrasound because there are no prospective blinded studies available comparing the interobserver variation in thyroid nodule volume measurement. The aim of our study was therefore to determine the variation of thyroid nodule volume determinations for different observers. We conducted a prospective blinded trial. Our study population consisted of 42 probands (8 men, 34 women) with an uniform distribution of thyroid nodule sizes (25 uninodular and 17 multinodular thyroid glands). We compared the results of 3 ultrasonographers with certified experience in thyroid ultrasound. The interobserver variation for the determination of thyroid nodule volume (n = 38) was 48.96% for the ellipsoid method and 48.64% for the planimetric method. The interobserver variation for determining thyroid volume (n = 40) was 23.69% for the ellipsoid method and 17.82% for the planimetric method. A regression analysis revealed that the probability for the identification of the same nodule in nodular thyroids by all sonographers is 90%, if the nodule is at least 15mm in greatest diameter. Future investigations should not describe changes in nodule volume less than 50% as therapy effects because only volume changes of at least 49% or more can be interpreted as nodule shrinkage or growth. Reporting of nodule volume modification 50% or more and lack of information for ultrasound procedures introduce a bias in studies evaluating the effects of nodule treatments. The clinical interpretation of a shrinking/growing thyroid nodule based on volume determinations by ultrasound is not well established because it is difficult to reproduce a two-dimensional image plane for follow-up studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V F H Brauer
- Division of Endocrinology, III. Department of Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Krohn K, Führer D, Bayer Y, Eszlinger M, Brauer V, Neumann S, Paschke R. Molecular pathogenesis of euthyroid and toxic multinodular goiter. Endocr Rev 2005; 26:504-24. [PMID: 15615818 DOI: 10.1210/er.2004-0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to summarize current knowledge of the etiology of euthyroid and toxic multinodular goiter (MNG) with respect to the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and molecular pathology. In reconstructing the line of events from early thyroid hyperplasia to MNG we will argue the predominant neoplastic character of nodular structures, the nature of known somatic mutations, and the importance of mutagenesis. Furthermore, we outline direct and indirect consequences of these somatic mutations for thyroid pathophysiology and summarize information concerning a possible genetic background of euthyroid goiter. Finally, we discuss uncertainties and open questions in differential diagnosis and therapy of euthyroid and toxic MNG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Knut Krohn
- Universität Leipzig, Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Ph.-Rosenthal-Strasse 27, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Orija IB, Hamrahian AH, Reddy SSK. Management of nondiagnostic thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy: survey of endocrinologists. Endocr Pract 2005; 10:317-23. [PMID: 15760774 DOI: 10.4158/ep.10.4.317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the approach of endocrinologists in the setting of nondiagnostic thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies. METHODS In 2002, we surveyed physicians attending the national annual meetings of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the Endocrine Society of North America, using a 13-item questionnaire. The responses were tallied and analyzed. RESULTS Of the 143 respondents, 139 were endocrinologists, with a male:female ratio of 2.5:1. Most respondents were involved in a medical practice in North America, but Europe, Asia, New Zealand, and Australia were also represented. Of those performing thyroid FNA biopsy, 31% used thyroid ultrasound guidance. Among the survey respondents, 16%, 49%, 20%, and 15% performed less than 2, 2 to 5, 6 to 10, and more than 10 thyroid FNA biopsies per month, respectively. Among the respondents, 13.5%, 44%, 28.5%, 10%, and 4% had non-diagnostic rates of less than 5%, 5 to 10%, 11 to 20%, 21 to 30%, and more than 30%, respectively. The approach of the respondents to an initially nondiagnostic FNA was repeated FNA biopsy in 87%, observation in 7%, levothyroxine suppression in 4%, and thyroid scintigraphy in 2%. Respondents believed that the most cost-effective approach in a patient with nondiagnostic FNA was repeated biopsy (82%), monitoring the size of the thyroid nodule (17%), and surgical referral (<1%). No one was willing to repeat the thyroid biopsy more than three times. CONCLUSION On the basis of findings in our survey, most endocrinologists repeat thyroid FNA at least once when confronted with a nondiagnostic result. No published studies have demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of this approach versus proceeding to surgical intervention or observation. We hope that this survey will encourage further studies on this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Israel B Orija
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Evidence-based medicine is the judicious, conscientious, and explicit use of the best available evidence from clinical research in making clinical decisions. This definition recognizes a hierarchy of evidence that arranges study designs by their susceptibility to bias. The top of the hierarchy includes n-of-1 trials, systematic reviews of randomized trials, and single randomized trials reporting patient-important outcomes. The bottom of the hierarchy includes physiologic studies and unsystematic clinical observations. The definition posits that evidence alone is never enough to guide clinical decisions. In addition to evidence from clinical research, decision making requires careful and expert assessment of the patient's circumstances and elicitation of the patient's values and preferences. The latter should drive decisions, particularly when the trade-offs (of benefit and risk) are close or unclear. The evidence-based medicine process involves: (i) asking an answerable question; (ii) acquiring the best available evidence; (iii) appraising the evidence to judge the strength of inference of its results; and (iv) applying the results to the individual patient. Evidence-based endocrinology is hindered by limited high-level evidence assessing patient-important outcomes, limited systematic summaries of this evidence, lack of time, and lack of systematic training of endocrinologists in evidence-based medicine. Current endocrine practice may require a redesign to enhance the role of endocrinologists as information brokers for colleagues and patients. In the last 10 years, evidence-based medicine has matured as a philosophy of clinical care and medical education. An appraisal of its role in endocrinology awaits the pervasion of its principles into all of endocrine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Montori
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, Nutrition, and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|