The West Midlands epithelial ovarian cancer adjuvant therapy trial

Radiotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer: updated results of involved-field radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to update the possible clinical benefits of radiation therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The medical records of 495 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after initially undergoing maximal cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy based on the pathologic stage between January 2010 and December 2020 were analyzed: 309 and 186 patients were treated without and with involved-field radiation therapy, respectively. Involved-field radiation therapy is defined as radiation therapy only to the areas of the body involved by tumor. The prescribed doses were ≥45 Gy (equivalent dose in 2 Gy/fraction). Overall survival was compared between patients treated with and without involved-field radiation therapy. The favorable group was defined as patients who satisfied at least four of the following factors: good performance, no ascites, normal CA-125, platinum-sensitive tumor, and nodal recurrence.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 56 years (range 49-63) and median time to recurrence was 11.1 months (range 6.1-15.5). 217 patients (43.8%) were treated at a single site. Radiation therapy, performance status, CA-125, platinum sensitivity, residual disease, and ascites were all significant prognostic factors. The 3-year overall survival of all patients, patients treated without radiation therapy, and patients treated with radiation therapy was 54.0%, 44.8%, and 69.3%, respectively. Radiation therapy was associated with higher overall survival rates in the unfavorable and favorable patient groups. Patient characteristics showed higher rates of normal CA-125, lymph node metastasis only, lower platinum sensitivity, and higher rates of ascites in the radiation therapy group. After propensity score matching, the radiation therapy group showed superior overall survival to the non-radiation therapy group. Normal CA-125, good performance status, and platinum sensitivity were associated with a good prognosis in patients treated with radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that higher overall survival was observed in patients treated with radiation therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer.

[Radiotherapy for ovarian carcinoma management: Literature review]

Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cancer in women in France with 4714 new cases in 2017. More than 70% of patients whose disease is initially locally advanced will present locoregional or distant recurrence. Therapeutic options in this situation are not consensual. They are based on chemotherapy possibly associated with an iterative cytoreductive surgery when it is bearable by the patient. The place of radiotherapy in the management of the disease is hidden in the vast majority of national or international standards. We conducted a general review of the literature to clarify the role of irradiation in the global management of ovarian cancers, particularly in recurrence.

Potential role of radiation therapy in augmenting the activity of immunotherapy for gynecologic cancers

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become an area of intense interest in oncology and are actively being studied in a variety of cancer types with a wide range of success. In vitro data suggest mechanisms by which radiation can activate the immune system, and ongoing studies are exploring the potential interaction of checkpoint inhibitors with radiotherapy in both preclinical and clinical settings. Gynecologic malignancies are a heterogeneous group of tumors with varying prognoses, intrinsic immunogenicity, and potential for response to immune-based therapies. In this review, we focus on the rationale for immunotherapy and opportunities for augmentation by photon radiotherapy in cancers of the cervix, endometrium, and ovary.

Radiation Treatment in Women with Ovarian Cancer: Past, Present, and Future

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal of the gynecologic cancers, with 5-year survival rates less than 50%. Most women present with advanced stage disease as the pattern of spread is typically with dissemination of malignancy throughout the peritoneal cavity prior to development of any symptoms. Prior to the advent of platinum-based chemotherapy, radiotherapy was used as adjuvant therapy to sterilize micrometastatic disease. The evolution of radiotherapy is detailed in this review, which establishes radiotherapy as an effective therapy for women with micrometastatic disease in the peritoneal cavity after surgery, ovarian clear cell carcinoma, focal metastatic disease, and for palliation of advanced disease. However, with older techniques, the toxicity of whole abdominal radiotherapy and the advancement of systemic therapies have limited the use of radiotherapy in this disease. With newer radiotherapy techniques, including intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and low-dose hyperfractionation in combination with targeted agents, radiotherapy could be reconsidered as part of the standard management for this deadly disease.

Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy on moderate- and high-risk stage I and II epithelian ovarian cancer patients. Long-term single institution experience and literature review

BACKGROUND

Although the optimal management of women with FIGO stages I and II epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is still controversial, platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is the mainstay of treatment. Suboptimal survival results have led to major efforts to identify prognostic factors, improve surgical staging and develop adjuvant therapies to improve patients' outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluate in a retrospective study clinical efficacy and the toxicity profile of a platinum-based adjuvant CT in FIGO stages I and II EOC treated at our institution from March 1984 to December 2006. Grade I FIGO stages IA-IB were excluded from the analysis. In the first period (1984-1997), patients received a platinum-based regimen without taxanes. In the second period from 1997 onwards, patients were treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Four to six cycles of adjuvant CT were administered. Potential predictive factors of efficacy and the role of paclitaxel addition were also analysed.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-eight patients (60 treated with paclitaxel) met inclusion criteria and were evaluable. Median age at diagnosis was 53.7 years (range 19-81) and most patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score (ECOG) of 0-1 (91.8%); 82.9% patients had pathological stage I and 17.1% pathological stage II. With a median follow up of 8.34 years (range 4.4-11.6), 103 patients (74.1%) were free of disease and 110 of them were alive (79.1%). Median relapse-free survival (RFS) and median overall survival (OS) had not been reached at the time of the analysis. No survival difference was found between paclitaxel and carboplatin combination or non-paclitaxel-containing regimens. Statistically significant prognostic factors for better RFS in the multivariate analysis were: ECOG 0 (p=0.023; HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.17-0.57); FIGO I stage (p<0.001; HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.15-0.58); I-II histological grade (p=0.005; HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.19-0.75); mucinous histology (p=0.013; HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.13-0.53); non-surgical adherences (p<0.002, HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.15-0.54); paracolic gutters inspection (p=0.033; HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.26-0.95) and liver surface biopsies (p=0.048; HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.41-0.98).Toxicity was generally mild and non-haematologic events were the most commonly found (62.9% of the total). The most frequent haematologic toxicities were neutropenia (41.7% in all grades, 9.5% grade 3-4) and anaemia (29.1% in all grades, 3.2% grade 3-4).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term outcome of this series is comparable to the published evidence and reflects the limited activity of platinum-based CT in the adjuvant setting. The potential survival advantage of the addition of paclitaxel to carboplatin cannot be definitively answered due to the small number of patients, the limited follow-up and the retrospective nature of the study. More effective and specific treatments are clearly required, in particular for those patients with stage II and undifferentiated tumours. Quality of surgery entails prognostic value.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage ovarian cancer: review of the literature

PURPOSE

This overview summarizes studies with acceptable quality and validity and presents a synthesis of the effectiveness on adjuvant therapy after surgery for early ovarian cancer (EOC) patients.

METHODS

The literature published between 1970 and 2006 was identified systematically by computer-based searches in MEDLINE and Cochrane library.

RESULTS

Twenty-two prospective randomized studies were analyzed, which included 4,626 patients. No difference between adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and radiotherapy was found. There is agreement on that patients with stage IA, grade 1 tumors have excellent survival and do not need postsurgical therapy. The International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm 1/Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Neoplasm trials were the first to show an effect on survival of AC, but in patients with adequate surgical staging, there was no additional effect of AC. For patients who are staged incompletely at the time of initial surgery, completion of the staging procedure with either laparoscopy or laparotomy is a reasonable approach before a final decision is made regarding the need for AC. If full staging cannot be performed due to medical contraindication or patient refusal, consideration of AC is reasonable in selected patients. Using prognostic variables such as grade, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics substage, pretreatment of CA-125 < or = 30 U/mL, and DNA ploidy, it is possible to divide patients into risk groups to avoid overtreatment. Gynecologic Oncology Group study 157 suggests that it may be possible to minimize chemotherapy-induced toxicity by using three instead of six cycles of AC, although it is not known fully whether this will compromise effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Future randomized studies in EOC will include the investigation of new targeted therapies and new prognostic factors in adequately staged patients.

IMRT of large fields: whole-abdomen irradiation

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of inverse planning for whole-abdomen intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with bone marrow and kidney sparing and to develop approaches to circumventing field size restrictions in the application of whole-abdomen IMRT using dynamic multileaf collimators (DMLC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The entire peritoneal cavity as derived from serial computerized tomography scans was defined as the gross target volume, whereas the planning target volume (PTV) was defined as the gross target volume plus a 5-mm margin extending 1 cm superiorly and inferiorly. In 10 randomly selected patients, the PTV ranged from 5629 to 12578 cc (median 7935 cc), and the superior-inferior, lateral, and anterior-posterior dimensions of the PTV ranged from 37 to 46 cm (median 42.5 cm), 27 to 33 cm (median 29 cm), and 18 to 23 cm (median 20 cm), respectively. A single isocenter was defined for patients with field length <40 cm. For patients with fields >40 cm, two isocenters were defined: one in the abdominal region, and the other in the pelvis. For IMRT planning, five 15-MV intensity-modulated beams at gantry angles of 180 degrees, 105 degrees, 35 degrees, 325 degrees, and 255 degrees were used. Optimization was designed to spare kidneys and bones. To fully account for the significant scattered dose contributions, an iterative process for dose calculations was implemented in the optimization. To overcome the 15-cm field width limit of our DMLC delivery system, fields with a width >15 cm were split into two or more subfields. To minimize field match errors, adjacent subfields overlapped by at least 2 cm, with intensity "feathering" in the overlap region. For patients with two isocenters, fields were overlapped and feathered in the cephalad-caudad direction by at least 3 cm. For comparison, conventional anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior 6-MV photon beams with posterior kidney blocks at extended distance were also generated for each patient.

RESULTS

Treatment plan optimization calculations required 20-80 min on a 500-MHz DEC alpha workstation. Including beam splitting, an average of 16 DMLC beams was used per patient. Delivery of 150 cGy required, on average, 1442 monitor units. For the same dose constraints on the kidneys, whole-abdomen IMRT resulted in significant dose reduction to the bones and improved PTV coverage as compared to conventional treatment. For a prescription dose of 30 Gy, the volume of the pelvic bones receiving more than 21 Gy was reduced on average by almost 60% with IMRT, and the mean dose to all bones was reduced from 24.0 +/- 1.5 Gy to 18.5 +/- 1.0 Gy (p = 0.002). PTV coverage, as measured by V95 (the volume receiving 95% of the prescription dose), improved from 71.7 +/- 4.8% with conventional treatment to 83.5 +/- 3.9% with IMRT (p = 0.002), although small regions of underdose in areas near the kidneys could not be avoided completely. The high-dose regions within the PTV, as measured by D05 (the dose covering 5% of PTV volume), increased slightly from 31.2 +/- 0.6 Gy with conventional treatment to 32.8 +/- 0.2 Gy with IMRT.

CONCLUSION

We have developed a process to plan and deliver whole-abdomen IMRT using standard linear accelerators and DMLC. IMRT can achieve better PTV coverage with the same level of kidney sparing and improved sparing of the bone marrow. These methods may be applicable also to other sites requiring large-field irradiation.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy represents a recent advancement in conformal radiotherapy. It employs specialized computer-driven technology to generate dose distributions that conform to tumor targets with extremely high precision. Treatment planning is based on inverse planning algorithms and iterative computer-driven optimization to generate treatment fields with varying intensities across the beam section. Combinations of intensity-modulated fields produce custom-tailored conformal dose distributions around the tumor, with steep dose gradients at the transition to adjacent normal tissues. Thus far, data have demonstrated improved precision of tumor targeting in carcinomas of the prostate, head and neck, thyroid, breast, and lung, as well as in gynecologic, brain, and paraspinal tumors and soft tissue sarcomas. In prostate cancer, intensity-modulated radiotherapy has resulted in reduced rectal toxicity and has permitted tumor dose escalation to previously unattainable levels. This experience indicates that intensity-modulated radiotherapy represents a significant advancement in the ability to deliver the high radiation doses that appear to be required to improve the local cure of several types of tumors. The integration of new methods of biologically based imaging into treatment planning is being explored to identify tumor foci with phenotypic expressions of radiation resistance, which would likely require high-dose treatments. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy provides an approach for differential dose painting to selectively increase the dose to specific tumor-bearing regions. The implementation of biologic evaluation of tumor sensitivity, in addition to methods that improve target delineation and dose delivery, represents a new dimension in intensity-modulated radiotherapy research.

Adjuvant 32P in the treatment of ovarian carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant 32P for patients with high-risk, early-stage ovarian carcinoma. Twenty-five patients underwent apparent complete resection followed by 32P (15 mCi) at the University of Florida between 1976 and 1993. Minimum and median follow-up times were 3 and 8 years, respectively. The rate of local control at 10 years was 83%. Four of the 5 patients who experienced recurrent disease had a component of intra-abdominal disease at the time of relapse. The absolute and cause-specific survival rates at 10 years were 68% and 82%, respectively. There were no severe acute complications. Five patients experienced significant late complications, including chronic abdominal cramping that was treated conservatively (3 patients) and small bowel obstruction necessitating surgical intervention (2 patients). Adjuvant 32P results in disease control and survival rates that are similar to those observed after adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the risk of late complications, particularly small bowel obstruction, is higher.

[Results of a randomized prospective trial comparing postoperative abdominopelvic radiotherapy with postoperative chemotherapy in early ovarian cancer]

PURPOSE

In a prospective randomized trial, our aim was to evaluate and compare the tolerance and efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the treatment of early ovarian cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 1990 and 1996, 150 patients with ovarian cancer stage IA, IB grades G2-3, and all patients classified IC and IIA, who did not have evidence of residual disease after surgery, were randomized to two treatment branches: radiotherapy or chemotherapy (CH). In the radiotherapy branch (76 patients), a whole abdomen irradiation of 30 Gy in 24 fractions over 5 weeks, with a pelvic boost to 50 Gy, was delivered. In the chemotherapy branch (74 patients), there were six series of polychemotherapy separated with 3-weeks interval. In each series patients received association of cisplatin (50 mg/m2, d1), adriamycin (50 mg/m2, d1) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2, d1).

RESULTS

The tolerance of the treatment was good and comparable in both groups. In the radiotherapy branch, three late grade G3 intestinal complications were observed (three bowel obstructions, which required surgery in two cases). The actuarial survival rate without evidence of disease was 81% at 5 years for both groups. In our series we found that histological grade had the strongest influence on survival prognosis; it was the only significant factor in a multivariate analysis. Patients with grade G3 tumors had the worst survival.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy administered to our patients with early ovarian cancer gave approximately identical results.

Adjuvant treatment for early epithelial ovarian cancer: results of two randomised clinical trials comparing cisplatin to no further treatment or chromic phosphate (32P). G.I.C.O.G.: Gruppo Interregionale Collaborativo in Ginecologia Oncologica

BACKGROUND

From 1983 to 1990, 271 consecutive patients with stage I ovarian cancer entered two randomised trials, aimed at assessing the role of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical surgery in early stages of ovarian cancer. Trial I compared cisplatin (50 mg/m2 with repeated courses every 28 days for 6 cycles) to no further therapy in F.I.G.O. stage Ia & b Grade II-III patients; trial II compared cisplatin (same dose and schedule) to 32P in Iaii & bii and Ic patients.

METHODS

Both studies were multicentric and centrally randomized. Treatment was allocated by phone and stratified by center. All patients satisfying major eligibility criteria (histological and grade, no previous neoplasms) were analysed according to treatment allocated by randomisation.

RESULTS

With a median observation time of 76 months, cisplatin significantly reduced the relapse rate by 65% (HR = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.14-0.89, p = 0.028; Cox Model) in trial I and 61% (HR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.19-0.77, p = 0.007; Cox Model) in trial II. Survival was not significantly different (trial I - Kaplan-Meier overall 5-year survival: cisplatin = 88%, control = 82%, HR = 1.15; 95% CI = 0.44-2.98; p = 0.773; Cox Model); trial II - overall 5-year survival: cisplatin = 81%, 32P = 79%, HR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.37-1.43; p = 0.354; Cox model). In both studies the risk of dying after relapse increased for patients originally randomized to the cisplatin arms: in trial I, 6 of 7 patients in the cisplatin relapsed arm and died of tumor compared with 8 of 14 patients in the control arm. In trial II 11 of 12 patients on cisplatin, and 18 of 26 on 32P succumbed to tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant cisplatin treatment in early ovarian cancer significantly prevents relapse in comparison to 32P in stage IC patients or to no immediate treatment in earlier stage women. The impact of cisplatin adjuvant treatment on survival remains, however, unclear.