Severe respiratory failure after infraclavicular block with 0.75% ropivacaine: a case report

Diaphragmatic and Pulmonary Functions Following an Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Approach Versus a Costoclavicular Approach of a Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Study

INTRODUCTION

A costoclavicular brachial plexus block is an emerging infraclavicular approach that targets the cords lateral to the axillary artery, providing rapid onset of sensory-motor blockade. However, the incidence of hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis (HDP), a potential complication, remains unclear compared to the widely used supraclavicular (SC) approach. This study aimed to compare the incidence of HDP between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and SC brachial plexus blocks.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the influence of ultrasound-guided SC and costoclavicular brachial plexus blocks on diaphragmatic excursion, thickness, and contractility along with pulmonary function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 This prospective, randomized, observer-blinded controlled trial included 60 patients undergoing below-shoulder surgeries. Patients were randomized to receive either ultrasound-guided SC (Group S) or costoclavicular (Group C) brachial plexus block with 0.5% levobupivacaine. The diaphragmatic function was assessed using ultrasonographic evaluation of diaphragm thickness and diaphragmatic thickness fraction (DTF) pre- and postblock. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) (forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR)) were performed preblock and two hours postblock. Block characteristics were compared.

RESULTS

The SC group exhibited a significantly larger reduction in DTF from preblock to postblock compared to the costoclavicular group (mean ΔDTF: 34.38% vs. 14.01%, p<0.01). Both groups showed significant declines in FVC, FEV1, and PEFR postblock, but the magnitude of deterioration was significantly greater in the SC group, displaying no significant difference in block characteristics.

CONCLUSION

The costoclavicular brachial plexus block demonstrated superior preservation of diaphragmatic contractility and lesser deterioration of PFTs compared to the SC approach while being equally effective. These findings highlight the potential benefits of the costoclavicular technique in minimizing diaphragmatic dysfunction and respiratory impairment, particularly in patients at risk for respiratory complications.

Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis after costoclavicular approach versus other brachial plexus blocks in upper limb surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The costoclavicular brachial plexus block (CCB) is a recently established technique that uses the infraclavicular approach and is performed just below the clavicle. This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether CCB can reduce the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP), which is a major adverse event related to brachial plexus block (BPB), while yielding comparable block performance as other BPB techniques.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases to identify relevant studies that compared the incidence of HDP between CCB and other BPB techniques. The primary outcome was the incidence of HDP following CCB and other BPB techniques. The secondary outcomes were pulmonary function test results, other adverse events, and block performance parameters such as onset and performance time.

RESULTS

We included six randomized controlled trials that included 414 patients. Compared with the other BPB group, the CCB group had a significantly lower incidence of HDP (relative ratio: 0.21, 95% CI [0.12, 0.36], P < 0.001) and higher peak expiratory flow rate (mean difference: 0.68 L/s, 95% CI [0.13, 1.23], P = 0.015). There were no significant between-group differences with respect to other adverse events and block performance parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with other BPB techniques, CCB involves a lower incidence of HDP with comparable onset and performance time.

Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following costoclavicular versus supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized controlled trial

Costoclavicular brachial plexus block is emerging as a promising infraclavicular approach performed just below the clavicle. However, there are relatively little data regarding the hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP) compared to the commonly performed supraclavicular block. We hypothesized that the incidence of HDP in costoclavicular block is lower than supraclavicular block like classical infraclavicular approach. Eighty patients were randomly assigned to ultrasound-guided supraclavicular (group S) or costoclavicular (group C) block with 25 mL of local anesthetics (1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.75% ropivacaine). The primary outcome was the incidence of HDP, defined as less than 20% of fractional change in the diaphragm thickness on ultrasound M-mode. Also, pulmonary function test and chest radiograph were assessed before and after the surgery. The incidence of HDP was 4/35 (11.4%) in the group C and 19/40 (47.5%) in the group S (risk difference, − 36%; 95% CI − 54 to − 17%; P = 0.002). The mean (SD) change of DTF values were 30.3% (44.0) and 56.9% (39.3) in the group C and S, respectively (difference in means, − 26.6%; 95% CI − 45.8 to − 7.4%; P = 0.007). The pulmonary function was more preserved in group C than in group S. The determined diagnostic cut off value of the diaphragm elevation on chest radiograph was 29 mm. Despite the very contiguous location of the two approaches around the clavicle, costoclavicular block can significantly reduce the risk of HDP compared with supraclavicular block.

Anatomy of the brachial plexus and its implications for daily clinical practice: regional anesthesia is applied anatomy

Safety and effectiveness are mandatory requirements for any technique of regional anesthesia and can only be met by clinicians who appropriately understand all relevant anatomical details. Anatomical texts written for anesthetists may oversimplify the facts, presumably in an effort to reconcile extreme complexity with a need to educate as many users as possible. When it comes to techniques as common as upper-extremity blocks, the need for customized anatomical literature is even greater, particularly because the complex anatomy of the brachial plexus has never been described for anesthetists with a focus placed on regional anesthesia. The authors have undertaken to close this gap by compiling a structured overview that is clinically oriented and tailored to the needs of regional anesthesia. They describe the anatomy of the brachial plexus (ventral rami, trunks, divisions, cords, and nerves) in relation to the topographical regions used for access (interscalene gap, posterior triangle of the neck, infraclavicular fossa, and axillary fossa) and discuss the (interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary) block procedures associated with these access regions. They indicate allowances to be made for anatomical variations and the topography of fascial anatomy, give recommendations for ultrasound imaging and needle guidance, and explain the risks of excessive volumes and misdirected spreading of local anesthetics in various anatomical contexts. It is hoped that clinicians will find this article to be a useful reference for decision-making, enabling them to select the most appropriate regional anesthetic technique in any given situation, and to correctly judge the risks involved, whenever they prepare patients for a specific upper-limb surgical procedure.

Costoclavicular brachial plexus block reduces hemidiaphragmatic paralysis more than supraclavicular brachial plexus block: retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study

Background

Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, a frequent complication of the brachial plexus block performed above the clavicle, is rarely associated with an infraclavicular approach. The costoclavicular brachial plexus block is emerging as a promising infraclavicular approach. However, it may increase the risk of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis because the proximity to the phrenic nerve is greater than in the classical infraclavicular approach.

Methods

This retrospective analysis compared the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis in patients undergoing costoclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks. Of 315 patients who underwent brachial plexus block performed by a single anesthesiologist, 118 underwent costoclavicular, and 197 underwent supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Propensity score matching selected 118 pairs of patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, defined as a postoperative elevation of the hemidiaphragm > 20 mm. Factors affecting the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis were also evaluated.

Results

Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis was observed in three patients (2.5%) who underwent costoclavicular and 47 (39.8%) who underwent supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (P < 0.001; odds ratio, 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.13). Both the brachial plexus block approach and the injected volume of local anesthetic were significantly associated with hemidiaphragmatic paralysis.

Conclusions

The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis is significantly lower with costoclavicular than with supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Effect of a lateral infraclavicular brachial plexus block on the axillary and suprascapular nerves as determined by electromyography - a cohort study

We aimed to examine to what extent a lateral infraclavicular brachial plexus block affected the axillary and the suprascapular nerve. We included patients undergoing hand surgery anaesthetised with a lateral infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Our primary outcome was the relative change in surface electromyography during maximum voluntary isometric contraction of the medial deltoid muscle (axillary nerve) and the infraspinatus muscle (suprascapular nerve) from baseline to 30 min after the block procedure. A reduction in electromyography of > 50% defined a successful block. The impact of the block on the shoulder nerves was compared with the surgical target nerves of the arm and hand (musculocutaneous, radial, median and ulnar nerves). Twenty patients were included. The medians of the relative changes in the surface electromyography were significantly reduced (both p < 0.001) with 92% for the deltoid muscle and 30% for the infraspinatus muscle, respectively. In total, 18 out of 20 patients had reductions > 50% for the deltoid muscle, which was significantly different from the infraspinatus muscle, where the proportion was 5 out of 20 (p < 0.001). The medians of the relative reductions in electromyography for the arm and hand muscles were 90-96%, similar to the effect on the deltoid muscle. Our results suggest that a lateral infraclavicular block provides block of the axillary nerve comparable to the block of the surgical target nerves. The suprascapular nerve is blocked to a lesser degree. Combining a lateral infraclavicular brachial plexus block with a selective suprascapular block for shoulder surgery warrants further studies.

[Applications of noninvasive mechanical ventilation in anesthesiology and postanesthesia recovery care]

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) can be useful to anesthesiologists working in critical care units, postanesthesia recovery units, operating theaters, or other settings. NIV can help in situations of acute respiratory failure or serve as a preventive measure in patients undergoing interventions under local-regional anesthesia or diagnostic or therapeutic procedures requiring sedation. Successful NIV depends on adequately trained health personnel and the proper choice of material (interfaces, respirators, etc.) for each setting where this modality is used.

Superficial cervical plexus neuropathy after single-injection interscalene brachial plexus block

BACKGROUND

Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) using the modified lateral approach provides a well-established method of anesthesia and analgesia for patients undergoing shoulder surgery. Considering the neural anatomy at the site of injection, the superficial cervical plexus may be at risk of injury. We evaluated the incidence and characteristics of superficial cervical plexus neuropathy.

METHODS

During a 1-yr period, 273 consecutive patients requiring single-injection ISB for shoulder or proximal arm surgery were studied. Patients were examined for symptoms compatible with superficial cervical plexus injury before surgery, 24 h postoperatively, and contacted by telephone 31 days after surgery. Symptomatic patients received an additional phone call 6 mo after surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-four hours after shoulder surgery, 21 patients (7.7%) showed symptoms consistent with superficial cervical plexus neuropathy. Symptoms consisted of hypesthesia in 1-4 cutaneous branches of the cervical plexus. Five patients (1.8%) reported symptoms that lasted for >31 days. All symptoms had entirely resolved after 6 mo.

CONCLUSIONS

Superficial cervical plexus neuropathy is not uncommon after ISB using the modified lateral approach and the possibility should be discussed with patients preprocedurally.

Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008

Brachial plexus blockade is the cornerstone of the peripheral nerve regional anesthesia practice of most anesthesiologists. As part of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine's commitment to providing intensive evidence-based education related to regional anesthesia and analgesia, this article is a complete update of our 2002 comprehensive review of upper extremity anesthesia. The text of the review focuses on (1) pertinent anatomy, (2) approaches to the brachial plexus and techniques that optimize block quality, (4) local anesthetic and adjuvant pharmacology, (5) complications, (6) perioperative issues, and (6) challenges for future research.

[Complications after regional anesthesia]

In recent years, there has been a considerable increase in the number of procedures carried out under regional anesthesia. The techniques used can be associated with a number of complications, which should be understood so that they can be recognized and managed appropriately. The overall incidence of reported complications associated with these techniques is low and therefore, with currently available data, we can only have an approximate idea of their incidence. The objective of this study is to systematically describe the complications that may arise from the use of neuraxial and peripheral regional anesthesia techniques.

Brachial plexus blocks: infusions and other mechanisms to provide prolonged analgesia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Regional anesthesia has numerous benefits for upper extremity surgery such as improved analgesia, opioid sparing and reduced side effects. However, many of these advantages are lost after block regression. Recently, several strategies such as continuous ambulatory local anesthetic infusions and adjuvants that may potentiate analgesia after a brachial plexus block have been described and investigated. This review will highlight and place in context this recent work.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current investigations have demonstrated that brachial plexus analgesia can be extended by combining existing solutions and technology. This has been most evident in the use of ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks such as the interscalene, infraclavicular and axillary approaches. Accomplishing this safely in an outpatient setting requires the use of basic infusion pumps, patient education and a mechanism for follow-up after discharge. This strategy has prolonged pain relief and facilitated major operations on an outpatient basis. An alternative to this strategy is to combine adjuvants such as opioids, clonidine, ketamine and neostigmine to potentiate the effects of local anesthetics. These additives have had mixed results. The most promising solutions are the alpha-2-adrenergic agonists but further investigation is necessary to confirm their efficacy and quantify their appropriate dose and side effects.

SUMMARY

The advances and techniques recently described demonstrate that prolonging analgesia after brachial plexus blocks is possible. This may be accomplished via several different approaches and mechanisms resulting in improved patient analgesia and side effects.

Sonographically guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block in adults: a retrospective analysis of 1146 cases

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze our experience in 1146 cases of sonographically guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block (ICBPB) performed over 32 months.

METHODS

Anesthetic records of 1146 cases of sonographically guided ICBPB performed by our staff were studied retrospectively with the use of a database created by an automated anesthesia record-keeping system. The rates of successful blocks, failed blocks necessitating conversion to general anesthesia or requiring supplementation with local anesthetics, those requiring larger-than-usual doses of sedation, and complications were determined. Analysis included an attempt to determine the possible causes of inadequate blocks and complications.

RESULTS

In 1138 patients (99.3%), the block was successful. Six patients had incomplete blocks requiring general anesthesia, and another 2 patients needed local anesthetic supplementation by the surgeons. Ninety-seven percent of the blocks were performed by residents directly supervised by an attending anesthesiologist who held the ultrasound probe. The mean age+/-SD of the patients was 39+/-15 years; the mean duration of surgery was 165+/-114 minutes; and the male-female ratio was 4:1. More than 50% of patients were obese. There were no reported cases of nerve injury, pneumothorax, or local anesthetic toxicity. Arterial punctures occurred in 8 (0.7%) patients, but all were inconsequential.

CONCLUSIONS

The data from this retrospective study suggest that sonographic guidance provides a high success rate (99.3%) and improved safety for ICBPB. The increased operator team experience virtually eliminates failure and complications.