1
|
Stimulation of soil respiration by elevated CO 2 is enhanced under nitrogen limitation in a decade-long grassland study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117:33317-33324. [PMID: 33318221 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2002780117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Whether and how CO2 and nitrogen (N) availability interact to influence carbon (C) cycling processes such as soil respiration remains a question of considerable uncertainty in projecting future C-climate feedbacks, which are strongly influenced by multiple global change drivers, including elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations (eCO2) and increased N deposition. However, because decades of research on the responses of ecosystems to eCO2 and N enrichment have been done largely independently, their interactive effects on soil respiratory CO2 efflux remain unresolved. Here, we show that in a multifactor free-air CO2 enrichment experiment, BioCON (Biodiversity, CO2, and N deposition) in Minnesota, the positive response of soil respiration to eCO2 gradually strengthened at ambient (low) N supply but not enriched (high) N supply for the 12-y experimental period from 1998 to 2009. In contrast to earlier years, eCO2 stimulated soil respiration twice as much at low than at high N supply from 2006 to 2009. In parallel, microbial C degradation genes were significantly boosted by eCO2 at low but not high N supply. Incorporating those functional genes into a coupled C-N ecosystem model reduced model parameter uncertainty and improved the projections of the effects of different CO2 and N levels on soil respiration. If our observed results generalize to other ecosystems, they imply widely positive effects of eCO2 on soil respiration even in infertile systems.
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu L, Xu X, Tang X, Xin X, Ye L, Yang G, Tang H, Lv S, Xu D, Zhang Z. Managed grassland alters soil N dynamics and N 2O emissions in temperate steppe. J Environ Sci (China) 2018; 66:20-30. [PMID: 29628088 DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2017.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2017] [Revised: 03/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Reclamation of degraded grasslands as managed grasslands has been increasingly accelerated in recent years in China. Land use change affects soil nitrogen (N) dynamics and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. However, it remains unclear how large-scale grassland reclamation will impact the grassland ecosystem as a whole. Here, we investigated the effects of the conversion from native to managed grasslands on soil N dynamics and N2O emissions by field experiments in Hulunber in northern China. Soil (0-10cm), nitrate (NO3-), ammonium (NH4+), and microbial N were measured in plots in a temperate steppe (Leymus chinensis grassland) and two managed grasslands (Medicago sativa and Bromus inermis grasslands) in 2011 and 2012. The results showed conversion of L. chinensis grassland to M. sativa or B. inermis grasslands decreased concentrations of NO3--N, but did not change NH4+-N. Soil microbial N was slightly decreased by the conversion of L. chinensis grassland to M. sativa, but increased by the conversion to B. inermis. The conversion of L. chinensis grassland to M. sativa (i.e., a legume grass) increased N2O emissions by 26.2%, while the conversion to the B. inermis (i.e., a non-legume grass) reduced N2O emissions by 33.1%. The conversion from native to managed grasslands caused large created variations in soil NO3--N and NH4+-N concentrations. Net N mineralization rates did not change significantly in growing season or vegetation type, but to net nitrification rate. These results provide evidence on how reclamation may impact the grassland ecosystem in terms of N dynamics and N2O emissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijun Xu
- Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
| | - Xingliang Xu
- Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Xuejuan Tang
- Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Xiaoping Xin
- Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
| | - Liming Ye
- Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; Department of Geology (WE13), Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
| | - Guixia Yang
- Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Huajun Tang
- Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Shijie Lv
- Science College of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010018, China
| | - Dawei Xu
- Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Zhao Zhang
- Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang L, Qi Y, Dong Y, Peng Q, Guo S, He Y, Li Z. Effects and mechanism of freeze-thawing cycles on the soil N 2O fluxes in the temperate semi-arid steppe. J Environ Sci (China) 2017; 56:192-201. [PMID: 28571855 DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2016.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2016] [Revised: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/19/2016] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
High nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions during freeze-thawing period (FTP) have been observed in many different ecosystems. However, the knowledge about the dynamic of soil N2O emissions and its main driving mechanism during the freeze-thawing processes in grassland ecosystem is still limited. An in-situ experiment was conducted during the FTP on the sites with 0 and 15% surplus of the average rainfall and two levels of N addition (0,10gN/(m2·year)) during growing season (marked as W0N0, W15N0, W0N10, W15N10, respectively) to explore the effects of water and N background on soil N2O emissions during FTPs and the relationship between soil N2O emissions and environmental factors. The results indicated that water and N treatments conducted during growing season did not show significant effect on the N2O effluxes of FTP, but the soil mineral N contents of W0N10 treatment were significantly higher than those of W0N0, W15N0, W15N10 treatments (p<0.05). The soil PLFA concentrations of microbial groups monitored during 2015 spring freeze-thawing period (2015S-FTP) were lower than those during winter freeze-thawing period of 2014 (2014W-FTP), while cumulative soil N2O emissions of 2015S-FTP were higher than those of 2014W-FTP. The correlations between soil N2O effluxes and most of the measured environmental factors were insignificant, multiple stepwise regression analysis indicated that the soil temperature, soil NH4+-N content and air temperature were the major environmental factors which significantly influenced the N2O effluxes during 2014W-FTP, and air temperature and soil water content were the significant influencing factors during 2015S-FTP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liqin Wang
- Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
| | - Yuchun Qi
- Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
| | - Yunshe Dong
- Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Qin Peng
- Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Shufang Guo
- Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Yunlong He
- Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Zhaolin Li
- Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang X, Tan Y, Zhang B, Li A, Daryanto S, Wang L, Huang J. The impacts of precipitation increase and nitrogen addition on soil respiration in a semiarid temperate steppe. Ecosphere 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.1655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolin Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change; Institute of Botany; The Chinese Academy of Sciences; Beijing 100093 China
| | - Yulian Tan
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change; Institute of Botany; The Chinese Academy of Sciences; Beijing 100093 China
| | - Bingwei Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change; Institute of Botany; The Chinese Academy of Sciences; Beijing 100093 China
| | - Ang Li
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change; Institute of Botany; The Chinese Academy of Sciences; Beijing 100093 China
| | - Stefani Daryanto
- Department of Earth Sciences; Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis; Indianapolis Indiana 46202 USA
| | - Lixin Wang
- Department of Earth Sciences; Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis; Indianapolis Indiana 46202 USA
| | - Jianhui Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change; Institute of Botany; The Chinese Academy of Sciences; Beijing 100093 China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Beijing 100049 China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Feng Q, Liu S, Mao Z, Xu J, Wang Z, Le XC. Cover features and new Associate Editors of the Journal of Environmental Sciences. J Environ Sci (China) 2016; 48:1-5. [PMID: 27745653 DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2016.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Qingcai Feng
- Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
| | - Suqin Liu
- Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
| | - Zhengang Mao
- Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
| | - Jian Xu
- Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
| | - Zixuan Wang
- Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
| | - X Chris Le
- Division of Analytical and Environmental Toxicology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhu C, Ma Y, Wu H, Sun T, La Pierre KJ, Sun Z, Yu Q. Divergent Effects of Nitrogen Addition on Soil Respiration in a Semiarid Grassland. Sci Rep 2016; 6:33541. [PMID: 27629241 PMCID: PMC5024323 DOI: 10.1038/srep33541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2016] [Accepted: 08/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Nitrogen (N) deposition has been steadily increasing for decades, with consequences for soil respiration. However, we have a limited understanding of how soil respiration responds to N availability. Here, we investigated the soil respiration responses to low and high levels of N addition (0.4 mol N m(-2) yr(-1) vs 1.6 mol N m(-2) yr(-1)) over a two-year period in a semiarid Leymus chinensis grassland in Inner Mongolia, China. Our results show that low-level N addition increased soil respiration, plant belowground biomass and soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC), while high-level N additions decreased them. Soil respiration was positively correlated with plant belowground biomass, MBC, soil temperature and soil moisture. Together plant belowground biomass and MBC explained 99.4% of variation in mean soil respiration, with plant belowground biomass explaining 63.4% of the variation and soil MBC explaining the remaining 36%. Finally, the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration was not influenced by N additions. Overall, our results suggest that low levels of N deposition may stimulate soil respiration, but large increases in N availability may decrease soil respiration, and that these responses are driven by the dissimilar responses of both plant belowground biomass and soil MBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Zhu
- Institute of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
- Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Yiping Ma
- Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Honghui Wu
- National Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
- Department of Biology and Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA
| | - Tao Sun
- Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
| | | | - Zewei Sun
- Institute of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
| | - Qiang Yu
- National Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
- Department of Biology and Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA
| |
Collapse
|