The role of infrapopliteal MR angiography in patients undergoing optimal contrast angiography for chronic limb-threatening ischemia

Chapter II: Diagnostic methods

Non-invasive vascular studies can provide crucial information on the presence, location, and severity of critical limb ischaemia (CLI), as well as the initial assessment or treatment planning. Ankle-brachial index with Doppler ultrasound, despite limitations in diabetic and end-stage renal failure patients, is the first-line evaluation of CLI. In this group of patients, toe-brachial index measurement may better establish the diagnosis. Other non-invasive measurements, such as segmental limb pressure, continuous-wave Doppler analysis and pulse volume recording, are of limited accuracy. Transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO(2)) measurement may be of value when rest pain and ulcerations of the foot are present. Duplex ultrasound is the most important non-invasive tool in CLI patients combining haemodynamic evaluation with imaging modality. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) are the next imaging studies in the algorithm for CLI. Both CTA and MRA have been proven effective in aiding the decision-making of clinicians and accurate planning of intervention. The data acquired with CTA and MRA can be manipulated in a multiplanar and 3D fashion and can offer exquisite detail. CTA results are generally equivalent to MRA, and both compare favourably with contrast angiography. The individual use of different imaging modalities depends on local availability, experience, and costs. Contrast angiography represents the gold standard, provides detailed information about arterial anatomy, and is recommended when revascularisation is needed.

Preprocedural imaging: new options to reduce need for contrast angiography

In vascular surgery, the gold standard for evaluation of the lower-extremity arterial tree has long been contrast arteriography (CA). Associated risks of CA are well-documented and include severe allergic reactions, arterial injury and/or hemorrhage, and contrast-induced nephropathy. Increasingly, less-invasive techniques, with fewer inherent risks for complication, are being explored as diagnostic alternatives. Magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomography angiography, and duplex arteriography, each offer distinct advantages, though are not without limitation. This review explores the indications, advantages, and disadvantages of these newer technologies and provides a comparison to CA as a means for defining the anatomic features of patients undergoing lower-extremity revascularization. This data suggests that noninvasive imaging technologies may, in the future, play an increasingly important role in the surgical evaluation of the patient with lower-extremity ischemia.

Magnetic resonance angiography versus duplex arteriography in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization: which is the best replacement for contrast arteriography?

OBJECTIVE

In an effort to explore alternatives to contrast material-enhanced arteriography, we compared magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and duplex arteriography (DA) with contrast arteriography (CA) for defining anatomic features in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization.

METHODS

From August 1, 2001, to August 1, 2002, 61 consecutive inpatients (64 limbs) with chronic lower extremity ischemia underwent CA, MRA, and DA before undergoing lower extremity revascularization procedures. The reports of these tests and images were compared prospectively, and the differences in the iliac, femoropopliteal, and infrapopliteal segments were noted. The vessels were classified as mildly diseased (<50%), moderately diseased (50%-70%), severely diseased (71%-99%), or occluded. The studies and treatment plans based on these data were compared.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 76 +/- 10 years (SD). Indications for the procedures included gangrene (43%), ischemic ulcer (28%), rest pain (19%), severe claudication (9%), and failing bypass (1%). During this period 35 patients were ineligible for the protocol, because they could not undergo MRA (n=27) or angiography (n=8). Of the total 192 segments in the 64 patients (iliac, femoropopliteal, tibial), 17% were not able to be fully assessed with DA, and 7% with MRA. Disagreements with CA and DA were found in the iliac, femoropopliteal, and tibial segments in 0%, 7%, and 14% of cases, respectively, and between CA and MRA in 10%, 26%, and 42% of cases, respectively. Two of 9 differences (22%) between DA and CA were thought to be clinically significant, and 28 of 45 differences (62%) between MRA and CA were thought to be clinically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

A review of the data obtained in this series indicates that MRA does not yet seem to yield adequate data, at least in this highly selected population at our institution. When severe calcification is identified, CA may be necessary in patients undergoing DA.

Optimized diagnostic angiography in high-risk patients with severe peripheral vascular disease

Conventional arteriography remains the usual method for preoperative assessment of severe peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Unfortunately, many peripheral arteriograms are still performed with a suboptimal technique, which can cause significant diagnostic errors in patients with severe PVD. A suboptimal technique may be due to poor collimation (causing incorrect exposure and incorrect gray scale), excessive patient-film distance (magnification unsharpness), inadequate volume or density of contrast material, poor contrast resolution (screen-film arteriography), nonselective injection, patient movement, and pressure from restraints or incorrect patient position (failure to profile lesions, pseudo-occlusion from external pressure or plantar flexion). The technique of selective digital subtraction arteriography (DSA) allows one to avoid these errors. The superior contrast resolution of DSA allows use of lower concentrations of contrast material. Selective injection into the external iliac artery allows proper positioning and improves image quality. Demonstration of distal vessels is best achieved by using biplane arteriography. For patients with severe resting ischemia, especially those with diabetes, high-quality selective DSA is essential to ensure that all distal vessels suitable for distal bypass grafting are identified. When properly performed, selective DSA remains the investigation of choice for reliably demonstrating arterial anatomy in high-risk patients with severe PVD.