A multicenter validation study of Doppler ultrasound versus angiography

Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments

BACKGROUND

Carotid artery stenosis is an important cause of stroke and transient ischemic attack. Correctly and rapidly identifying patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis is essential for adequate treatment with early cerebral revascularization. Doubts about the diagnostic value regarding the accuracy of duplex ultrasound (DUS) and the possibility of using DUS as the single diagnostic test before carotid revascularization are still debated.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the accuracy of DUS in individuals with symptomatic carotid stenosis verified by either digital subtraction angiography (DSA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CRDTAS, CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), ISI Web of Science, HTA, DARE, and LILACS up to 15 February 2021. We handsearched the reference lists of all included studies and other relevant publications and contacted experts in the field to identify additional studies or unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies assessing DUS accuracy against an acceptable reference standard (DSA, MRA, or CTA) in symptomatic patients. We considered the classification of carotid stenosis with DUS defined with validated duplex velocity criteria, and the NASCET criteria for carotid stenosis measures on DSA, MRA, and CTA. We excluded studies that included < 70% of symptomatic patients; the time between the index test and the reference standard was longer than four weeks or not described, or that presented no objective criteria to estimate carotid stenosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The review authors independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns using the QUADAS-2 domain list. We extracted data with an effort to complete a 2 × 2 table (true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives) for each of the different categories of carotid stenosis and reference standards. We produced forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots to summarize the data. Where meta-analysis was possible, we used a bivariate meta-analysis model.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 25,087 unique studies, of which 22 were deemed eligible for inclusion (4957 carotid arteries). The risk of bias varied considerably across the studies, and studies were generally of moderate to low quality. We narratively described the results without meta-analysis in seven studies in which the criteria used to determine stenosis were too different from the duplex velocity criteria proposed in our protocol or studies that provided insufficient data to complete a 2 × 2 table for at least in one category of stenosis. Nine studies (2770 carotid arteries) presented DUS versus DSA results for 70% to 99% carotid artery stenosis, and two (685 carotid arteries) presented results from DUS versus CTA in this category. Seven studies presented results for occlusion with DSA as the reference standard and three with CTA as the reference standard. Five studies compared DUS versus DSA for 50% to 99% carotid artery stenosis. Only one study presented results from 50% to 69% carotid artery stenosis. For DUS versus DSA, for < 50% carotid artery stenosis, the summary sensitivity was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48 to 0.76) and the summary specificity was 0.99 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.99); for the 50% to 69% range, only one study was included and meta-analysis not performed; for the 50% to 99% range, the summary sensitivity was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.98) and the summary specificity was 0.70 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.73); for the 70% to 99% range, the summary sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.91) and the summary specificity was 0.98 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.90); for occlusion, the summary sensitivity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.97) and the summary specificity was 0.95 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.99). For sensitivity analyses, excluding studies in which participants were selected based on the presence of occlusion on DUS had an impact on specificity: 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). For DUS versus CTA, we found two studies in the range of 70% to 99%; the sensitivity varied from 0.57 to 0.94 and the specificity varied from 0.87 to 0.98. For occlusion, the summary sensitivity was 0.95 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.99) and the summary specificity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.99). For DUS versus MRA, there was one study with results for 50% to 99% carotid artery stenosis, with a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.98) and specificity of 0.60 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.95); in the 70% to 99% range, two studies were included, with sensitivity that varied from 0.54 to 0.99 and specificity that varied from 0.78 to 0.89. We could perform only a few of the proposed sensitivity analyses because of the small number of studies included.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review provides evidence that the diagnostic accuracy of DUS is high, especially at discriminating between the presence or absence of significant carotid artery stenosis (< 50% or 50% to 99%). This evidence, plus its less invasive nature, supports the early use of DUS for the detection of carotid artery stenosis. The accuracy for 70% to 99% carotid artery stenosis and occlusion is high. Clinicians should exercise caution when using DUS as the single preoperative diagnostic method, and the limitations should be considered. There was little evidence of the accuracy of DUS when compared with CTA or MRA. The results of this review should be interpreted with caution because they are based on studies of low methodological quality, mainly due to the patient selection method. Methodological problems in participant inclusion criteria from the studies discussed above apparently influenced an overestimated estimate of prevalence values. Most of the studies included failed to precisely describe inclusion criteria and previous testing. Future diagnostic accuracy studies should include direct comparisons of the various modalities of diagnostic tests (mainly DUS, CTA, and MRA) for carotid artery stenosis since DSA is no longer considered to be the best method for diagnosing carotid stenosis and less invasive tests are now used as reference standards in clinical practice. Also, for future studies, the participant inclusion criteria require careful attention.

Carotid endarterectomy should not be based on consensus statement duplex velocity criteria

OBJECTIVE

Randomized trials support carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in asymptomatic patients with ≥60% internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. The widely referenced Society for Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Statement on carotid duplex ultrasound (CDUS) imaging indicates that an ICA peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≥230 cm/s corresponds to a ≥70% ICA stenosis, leading to the potential conclusion that asymptomatic patients with an ICA PSV ≥230 cm/s would benefit from CEA. Our goal was to determine the natural history stroke risk of asymptomatic patients who might have undergone CEA based on consensus statement PSV of ≥230 cm/s but instead were treated medically based on more conservative CDUS imaging criteria.

METHODS

All patients who underwent CDUS imaging at our institution during 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. The year 2009 was chosen to ensure extended follow-up. Asymptomatic patients were included if their ICA PSV was ≥230 cm/s but less than what our laboratory considers a ≥80% stenosis by CDUS imaging (PSV ≥430 cm/s, end-diastolic velocity ≥151 cm/s, or ICA/common carotid artery PSV ratio ≥7.5). Study end points included freedom from transient ischemic attack (TIA), freedom from any stroke, freedom from carotid-etiology stroke, and freedom from revascularization.

RESULTS

Criteria for review were met by 327 patients. Mean follow-up was 4.3 years, with 85% of patients having >3-year follow-up. Four unheralded strokes occurred during follow-up at <1, 17, 25, and 30 months that were potentially attributable to the index carotid artery. Ipsilateral TIA occurred in 17 patients. An additional 12 strokes occurred that appeared unrelated to ipsilateral carotid disease, including hemorrhagic events, contralateral, and cerebellar strokes. Revascularization was undertaken in 59 patients, 1 for stroke, 12 for TIA, and 46 for asymptomatic disease. Actuarial freedom from carotid-etiology stroke was 99.7%, 98.4%, and 98.4% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Freedom from TIA was 98%, 96%, and 95%, freedom from any stroke was 99%, 96%, and 93%, and freedom from revascularization was 95%, 86%, and 81% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with intermediate asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ICA PSV 230-429 cm/s) do well with medical therapy when carefully monitored and intervened upon using conservative CDUS criteria. Furthermore, a substantial number of patients would undergo unnecessary CEA if consensus statement CDUS thresholds are used to recommend surgery. Current velocity threshold recommendations should be re-evaluated, with potentially important implications for upcoming clinical trials.

Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

The aim of this updated statement is to provide comprehensive and timely evidence-based recommendations on the prevention of stroke among individuals who have not previously experienced a stroke or transient ischemic attack. Evidence-based recommendations are included for the control of risk factors, interventional approaches to atherosclerotic disease of the cervicocephalic circulation, and antithrombotic treatments for preventing thrombotic and thromboembolic stroke. Further recommendations are provided for genetic and pharmacogenetic testing and for the prevention of stroke in a variety of other specific circumstances, including sickle cell disease and patent foramen ovale.

Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This guideline provides an overview of the evidence on established and emerging risk factors for stroke to provide evidence-based recommendations for the reduction of risk of a first stroke.

METHODS

Writing group members were nominated by the committee chair on the basis of their previous work in relevant topic areas and were approved by the American Heart Association (AHA) Stroke Council Scientific Statement Oversight Committee and the AHA Manuscript Oversight Committee. The writing group used systematic literature reviews (covering the time since the last review was published in 2006 up to April 2009), reference to previously published guidelines, personal files, and expert opinion to summarize existing evidence, indicate gaps in current knowledge, and when appropriate, formulate recommendations using standard AHA criteria (Tables 1 and 2). All members of the writing group had the opportunity to comment on the recommendations and approved the final version of this document. The guideline underwent extensive peer review by the Stroke Council leadership and the AHA scientific statements oversight committees before consideration and approval by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee.

RESULTS

Schemes for assessing a person's risk of a first stroke were evaluated. Risk factors or risk markers for a first stroke were classified according to potential for modification (nonmodifiable, modifiable, or potentially modifiable) and strength of evidence (well documented or less well documented). Nonmodifiable risk factors include age, sex, low birth weight, race/ethnicity, and genetic predisposition. Well-documented and modifiable risk factors include hypertension, exposure to cigarette smoke, diabetes, atrial fibrillation and certain other cardiac conditions, dyslipidemia, carotid artery stenosis, sickle cell disease, postmenopausal hormone therapy, poor diet, physical inactivity, and obesity and body fat distribution. Less well-documented or potentially modifiable risk factors include the metabolic syndrome, excessive alcohol consumption, drug abuse, use of oral contraceptives, sleep-disordered breathing, migraine, hyperhomocysteinemia, elevated lipoprotein(a), hypercoagulability, inflammation, and infection. Data on the use of aspirin for primary stroke prevention are reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive evidence identifies a variety of specific factors that increase the risk of a first stroke and that provide strategies for reducing that risk.

Importance of Validation of Accuracy of Duplex Ultrasonography in Identifying Moderate and Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis

Background and Purpose: The accuracy of carotid duplex ultrasonography (CDU) in detecting moderate and severe carotid artery disease was evaluated in comparison with arteriography. Methods: Accuracy of CDU was correlated with arteriographic findings using North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria in 147 internal carotid arteries. The duplex measurements consisted of peak systolic velocities (PSVs), end diastolic velocities (EDVs), and internal carotid PSV to common carotid artery PSV ratios (ICA/CCA). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy (OA) using the 3 parameters were determined. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed from the ultrasonographic data for detection of 50% or greater stenosis (moderate disease) and 70% or greater stenosis (severe disease). Results: CDU for detecting ≥50% stenosis had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 87.8%, and accuracy of 96.6%. The area under the ROC curves for PSV was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.93), for EDV was 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.92), and for ICA:CCA ratio was 0.95 (CI 0.91-0.99). CDU for detecting ≥70% stenosis had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 87.1%, and accuracy of 94.5%. The area under the ROC curves for PSV was 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.84), for EDV was 0.74 (95% CI of 0.65-0.82), and for ICA/CCA ratio was 0.89 (0.84-0.94). Conclusions: We conclude that ≥50% stenosis and ≥70% stenosis can be reliably determined by CDU in our vascular laboratory. Each vascular laboratory must validate their own criteria against the current gold standard of carotid arteriography. A high degree of confidence in CDU is critical before any institution uses the test as the sole diagnostic method prior to carotid intervention.

Critical review of non- or minimally invasive methods (duplex ultrasonography, MR- and CT-angiography) for evaluating stenosis of the proximal internal carotid artery

OBJECTIVE

to assess the performance of non- or minimally invasive methods (duplex ultrasonography, MR- and CT-angiography) in measuring stenosis of the proximal internal carotid prior to endarterectomy without preoperative intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

METHODS

systematic review of the literature (five databases, 1990 to February 2001). The value of each imaging technique was studied through its reproducibility and its sensitivity/specificity compared to DSA.

RESULTS

sensitivity exceeded 80% and specificity 90% in over two-thirds of the methodologically sound studies, regardless of technique, although direct comparisons between results had to be avoided since the findings originated from different populations. The main drawback of duplex ultrasonography is its levels of reproducibility. In contrast, only a few studies have addressed the reproducibility of MR- and CT-angiography. When the results of duplex and MR-angiography agree, the combination use of these two techniques provides a better diagnosis than either technique taken alone.

CONCLUSIONS

all three techniques appear suitable for measuring stenosis of the proximal internal carotid when compared to DSA.

Utility of noninvasive studies in the evaluation of patients with carotid artery disease

Endarterectomy reduces the risk of stroke in selected patients with carotid artery stenosis, and the benefit is related to the degree of stenosis. Although the randomized trials demonstrating this benefit measured the degree of stenosis with conventional catheter angiography, many physicians are relying on noninvasive tests to select patients for surgery. Technologic advancement in this area is outpacing the availability of quality data supporting the clinical utility of the newer noninvasive tests.

Carotid ultrasound

This article provides an overview of basic diagnostic carotid ultrasound applications, and emphasizes practical aspects of this examination. Areas currently being investigated include carotid plaque characterization and applications relative to IMT measurements. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging also offers promise to improve plaque characterization, which in turn may link these evaluations to outcome studies.

Variability in Doppler ultrasound influences referral of patients for carotid surgery

OBJECTIVE

Colour Doppler ultrasound is operator dependent, but it is unclear how much clinical impact this might have on patient referral for carotid endarterectomy. Our aim was to quantify the interobserver variability of Doppler ultrasound.

METHODS

Consecutive patients attending for carotid Doppler ultrasound underwent two examinations on the same day, in random order, by two of three observers blind to each other's results. Severity of stenosis was assessed using standard velocity criteria and lesion appearance.

RESULTS

A total of 189 patients were scanned (378 ICAs). Of the 134 ICAs scanned by observers 1 and 2, observer 1 classified 11 as 80-99% stenosis (operable), compared with nine by observer 2. Of the 206 ICAs scanned by observers 1 and 3, observer 1 classified 11 as 80-99% stenosis, compared with only five by observer 3. Of the 38 ICAs scanned by observers 2 and 3, observer 2 classified 2 as 80-99% stenosis compared with none by observer 3. Overall, clinical management would differ in 10/378 (3%) of ICAs, but in 10/22 (45%) of those considered operable by one of the three observers.

CONCLUSION

There was clinically important interobserver variability in the assessment of ICA disease, which could result in serious errors if endarterectomy were performed on the basis of a single Doppler ultrasound.

CT angiography for the detection and characterization of carotid artery bifurcation disease

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is a relatively new and minimally invasive method of imaging intracranial and extracranial blood vessels. The main purpose of this study was to compare CTA to the current gold standard of arterial imaging, digital subtraction angiography (DSA), for the detection and quantification of carotid artery bifurcation stenosis. We also compared Doppler ultrasound (US) with these 2 techniques.

METHODS

In a prospective study, 40 patients (80 carotid arteries) underwent CTA, US, and DSA. Patients chosen for inclusion were symptomatic with TIAs or stroke and had initial US screening that indicated >50% carotid stenosis on the side appropriate for the symptoms. Source axial, maximum intensity projection (MIP), and shaded-surface display (SSD) images were produced for each CTA study. The US, CTA, and DSA images were reviewed, with the degree of stenosis quantified and presence of ulcers determined; each type of imaging was reviewed by a separate investigator blinded to the results of the other 2 modalities. The results of CTA and US imaging were compared with the DSA images for degrees of carotid stenosis.

RESULTS

CTA source axial images correlated with DSA more closely than MIP or SSD images for all degrees of stenosis. The correlation between US and DSA (0.808) was poorer than that between CTA and DSA (0.892 to 0.922). CTA performed well in the detection of mild (0% to 29%) carotid stenosis, as well as carotid occlusion, with values for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy near 100%. In determining that a stenosis was >50% by DSA measurement, CTA was again useful, with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 89%, 91%, and 90%, respectively. While CTA was quite specific and accurate in identifying degrees of stenoses in either the 50% to 69% or the 70% to 99% ranges, in this task it was much less sensitive: 65% for 50%-69% stenosis and 73% for 70%-99% stenosis. These results did not change significantly when only the data from the most clinically relevant symptomatic arteries were analyzed. CTA was found to correlate quite well with DSA in the detection of ulcers associated with the carotid stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

CTA was found to be an excellent examination for the detection of carotid occlusion and categorization of stenosis in either the 0%-29% or >50% ranges. However, CTA was unable to reliably distinguish between moderate (50%-69%) and severe (70%-99%) stenosis, which is an important limitation in the investigation and treatment of carotid stenosis.

A new pocket-sized transcranial ultrasound device (NeuroDop): comparison with standard TCD

The NeuroDop is a new bedside assessment tool consisting of a continuous wave ultrasound probe attached to a stethoscope earpiece. This study was designed to compare middle cerebral artery (MCA) velocity assessment obtained with the NeuroDop versus standard transcranial Doppler (TCD). TCD technologists performed continuous wave NeuroDop studies followed by standard TCD studies on 60 subjects. Technologists recorded presence of MCA signal and estimated velocity based on NeuroDop auditory characteristics. Signal was obtained in 108 MCA vessels with the portable unit and in 112 vessels using standard TCD. For detection of patency, sensitivity was 96%, specificity 88%, positive predictive value 99%, and negative predictive value 58%. Auditorially estimated velocities from the NeuroDop strongly correlated with TCD velocity measures (r = 0.71). Categorical estimates of velocity as decreased (< 37 cm/sec), normal (37-81 cm/sec), or increased (> 81 cm/sec) demonstrated an accuracy rate of 85%. This novel stethoscope-continuous wave unit has excellent sensitivity in detecting presence of MCA patency. Moreover, MCA velocities can be characterized to a reasonable degree of accuracy based on NeuroDop auditory characteristics. The NeuroDop shows promise as a tool to rapidly assess and serially monitor presence and amplitude of MCA velocity and may help guide thrombolytic and other emergency management decisions in stroke patients.

The limitations of carotid sonography: interpretive and technology-related errors

OBJECTIVE

This study compared carotid artery sonography with angiography to determine, in retrospect, which types of sonographic errors arose from incorrect interpretation of sonographic images and which errors could be ascribed to the limitations of sonographic imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of all patients who underwent carotid artery sonography and angiography between 1993 and 1997 at our institution revealed 66 patients with complete sets of studies, yielding 132 examinations (right or left). Studies were not reinterpreted and angiography was considered to be the gold standard. Only stenoses of 60% or greater were included in our study. If the degree or location of stenosis differed on the two imaging studies, they were reviewed together to classify the type of sonographic error.

RESULTS

We found complete agreement of sonography and angiography in 115 cases (87%) and discrepancies in 17 (13%). Thirteen of 17 sonographic errors were false-positive interpretations and three were false-negative interpretations. One was an error in location. Retrospective review showed seven interpretive errors. In all these cases, the color Doppler image better revealed the degree of stenosis. Other complicating factors included inconsistencies between absolute velocities, velocity ratios, and waveforms obtained while a patient was being treated with an intraaortic balloon pump. In the other 10 discrepancies, the sonographic interpretation was accurate. Seven of these cases were false-positive interpretations in patients with contralateral occlusions or stenoses. The other three cases in this group showed long segments of stenosis, ulcerations, or tortuous vessels on angiography.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that increased accuracy can be achieved in the interpretation of carotid artery sonography by meticulous attention to the color image. When color Doppler sonography is technically limited by tortuosity or ulceration, or if significant contralateral disease is present, misinterpretation is more likely.

Carotid screening with duplex ultrasound in elderly asymptomatic patients referred to a vascular surgeon: is it worthwhile?

The purpose of this study is to prospectively determine the outcome of carotid duplex ultrasound screening in patients referred to a vascular surgeon for problems other than carotid disease. During a recent 12-month period, 307 patients age 65 years and older (mean 76 +/- 8 years) were referred to one vascular surgeon for problems other than cerebrovascular disease. Fifty-one percent of the patients were male, 49% were female, 32% were diabetic, 32% were hypertensive, 31% smoked, 20% had coronary artery disease, and 64% had peripheral arterial occlusive disease. All patients underwent a screening duplex ultrasound exam of the carotid arteries as approved by our Institutional Review Board. The results of our study showed that the prevalence of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis >70% among patients seen by a vascular surgeon for problems other than cerebrovascular disease is high (21%) and is associated with male gender, advanced age, diabetes mellitus and having quit smoking. Continued carotid artery duplex screening is warranted in this patient population greater than age 65 years.

Interrater reliability of plaque morphology classification in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis

OBJECTIVE

Ultrasonographic assessment of carotid artery plaque morphology is widely used to identify patients at high risk for stroke. However, the reliability of plaque analysis in high-grade stenosis is uncertain. We determined the interrater reliability of sonographic plaque morphology analysis in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Duplex Doppler was performed on 114 patients with 80-99% stenosis of the internal carotid artery using a Siemens Quantum 2000 D with a handheld 7.5 MHz transducer. B-mode pictures with and without color coding were printed on a Sony color video printer UP-5000 W. Three raters independently evaluated plaque echolucency, heterogeneity, calcification, and surface structure. Interrater agreement was calculated by a jackknife procedure generating kappa values and two-sided 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Kappa values and 95% confidence intervals were 0.05 (-0.07 to 0.16) for plaque surface structure, 0.15 (0.02 to 0.28) for plaque heterogeneity, 0.18 (0.09 to 0.29) for plaque echogenicity, and 0.29 (0.19 to 0.39) for plaque calcification. The upper bounds of all of the confidence intervals were below the 0.40 level suggested for minimal reliability.

CONCLUSION

The low interrater agreement indicated that unaided visual assessment of static B-mode pictures to assess plaque morphology in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis is not reliable. Other evaluation procedures and standardized criteria, as yet undeveloped, are needed to improve reliability.

Recurrent carotid stenosis : results of the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We sought to determine the incidence of recurrent carotid stenosis in patients in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) who had undergone carotid endarterectomy and were prospectively followed with Doppler ultrasound for up to 5 years.

METHODS

The ACAS database was interrogated to determine the rate of recurrent carotid stenosis (>/=60%) based up angiogram-validated Doppler data, with a 90% and a 95% positive predictive value, as well as information concerning the technologists' interpretation of percent stenosis. These 3 parameters are reported for each of 3 time intervals: within 3 months of operation (residual disease), between 3 and 18 months (early restenoses), and between 18 and 60 months (late restenosis).

RESULTS

Of the 825 patients randomized to the surgical arm of the study, 720 actually underwent carotid endarterectomy, and 645 had complete ultrasound data. The aggregate incidence of residual and recurrent carotid stenosis for all time intervals ranged from 12.7% to 20.4%, depending on the positive predictive value confidence level desired. Residual disease occurred in 4.1% to 6.5%; true, early restenosis was found in 7.6% to 11.4%; and late restenosis occurred in 1.9% to 4.9%. None of the traditional risk factors showed a statistically significant effect on recurrent stenosis. The use of patch angioplasty closure reduced overall risk of restenosis from 21.2% to 7.1%, from 16.7% to 4.6%, and from 27.4% to 8.2%, depending on the PPV confidence level desired (P<0.001). Of the 136 patients judged to have recurrent stenosis, only 8 (5.9%) underwent reoperation (only 1 for symptoms). There was no correlation between late stroke and recurrent stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid endarterectomy is a durable procedure with a low rate of true restenosis, particularly when patch angioplasty is used to close the arteriotomy.

Cigarette smoking as a determinant of high-grade carotid artery stenosis in Hispanic, black, and white patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We sought to investigate the association of cigarette smoking with high-grade carotid artery stenosis in Hispanic, black, and white patients with cerebral ischemia in two independent samples.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study (NOMASS) (n=431) and the Berlin Cerebral Ischemia Databank (BCID) (n=483) were used separately for a cross-sectional study estimating the association between cigarette smoking and high-grade carotid stenosis (defined as a luminal narrowing of > or =60%, diagnosed by duplex and/or Doppler ultrasound). In both studies, cerebral ischemia patients with normal sonographic findings or nonstenosing plaques of their carotid arteries served as a comparison group. Multivariate logistic regression models were used for statistical tests to determine the association between smoking and the dependent variable for high-grade carotid stenosis. Age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and race/ethnicity were considered potential confounders. Further analyses of the NOMASS data estimated the effect of the amount of cigarette use and the impact of race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

High-grade carotid stenoses were found in 14% of the NOMASS and in 21% of the Berlin patients. In Berlin the entire sample was white, whereas in New York only 19% of the cohort were white. In both samples, smoking was independently associated with severe carotid stenosis (NOMASS: odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 2.0; BCID: OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.4 to 6.4). Patients smoking 20 pack-years or more showed a significant association (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.9), whereas no significant effect was found for lower amounts of cigarette use. In NOMASS, white smokers displayed a significant (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 8.9) association with high-grade carotid stenosis, the association for black smokers was less strong, and no association was found among Hispanics.

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking is an independent determinant of severe carotid artery stenosis in patients with focal cerebral ischemia. The association differs by race/ethnicity, with the greatest effect observed among whites.

Carotid endarterectomy: the mandate for high quality duplex

Excellent correlation between carotid angiography and duplex scanning has made it possible to perform carotid endarterectomy without angiography. The accuracy of scans from practices without a dedicated vascular laboratory must be validated prior to their use for clinical decisions. Seventy six patients had a carotid duplex performed at an outside institution and were referred for vascular surgery. All patients underwent a repeat study at our dedicated vascular lab. The overall accuracy of our lab was 93.8% for all carotid categories as demonstrated by angiography. Outside carotid duplex reports correlated with repeat exams as follows: occlusions: 10/13 carotids (76.9%); 80%-99% stenoses: 15/39 carotids (38.5%); 50%-79% stenoses: 28/44 carotids (63.6%). If a surgeon's practice is to operate for asymptomatic 80%-99% stenoses by report, then unnecessary surgery might have been performed in 61.5% of these carotids and appropriate surgery denied in 3.6%. Outside duplex velocities consistent with a 60%-99% stenosis correlated in 13/17 carotids (76.5%). If a surgeon's practice is to operate for asymptomatic 60%-99% stenoses based on velocity criteria, then unnecessary surgery might have been performed in 23.5% of these carotids, and appropriate surgery denied in 7.6% placing these patients at increased risk of stroke. Outside scans significantly overestimated the severity of carotid disease (p = 0.003). The weighted kappa analysis for agreement between scans was only 60.2%. Failure to have validated high-quality duplex in labs performing carotid studies can lead to unnecessary angiography or surgery. Carotid endarterectomy without angiography should be performed only when duplex accuracy has been previously validated by angiographic correlation studies. Poor agreement with studies from practices without a dedicated vascular lab makes it mandatory to repeat the duplex on all patients prior to clinical decision making. Reimbursement for such repeat studies should not be denied.

The agreement between colour Doppler systems in measuring internal carotid artery peak systolic velocities

The study was undertaken to determine if the internal carotid artery peak systolic velocities (ICA PSVs) measured by two colour Doppler imaging systems (Acuson 128 and Siemens Quantum) agree sufficiently for the two systems to be interchangeable in evaluating carotid artery disease. One operator obtained blinded measurements of ICA PSV in 63 prospective nonrandomized patients at risk of stroke. The operator examined 20 patients in the first cohort to assess the intraobserver variation, and 43 patients in the second cohort to assess the limits of agreement between the systems. In vitro comparisons of the systems were also undertaken, using both string and flow phantoms. Excluding one outlier, the intraobserver reproducibility coefficient for both machines was 0.48 m s-1. The limits of agreement (within which 95% of differences lie) between systems were -0.47 to 0.45 m s-1. This reduced to -0.39 to 0.33 m s-1 when the one outlier was excluded. This is within the intraobserver reproducibility range. In vitro data show little intersystem variation with phantom velocity. Intratransducer differences increase when the Doppler angle is increased using the string phantom; maximum differences: Acuson 0.30 m s-1 (42%) and Siemens 0.32 m s-1 (32%). These are within the in vivo reproducibility range. Intratransducer difference decreases when the Doppler angle is increased using the flow phantom, maximum differences: Acuson 0.05 m s-1 and Siemens 0.07 m s-1. The results show the systems agree sufficiently to be interchangeable in evaluating carotid artery disease; however, errors in maximum PSVs, caused by operator or system variation, may lead to errors in percent stenosis grading of the carotid arteries.

Duplex ultrasound criteria for the identification of carotid stenosis should be laboratory specific

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Published criteria for the determination of carotid stenosis have been widely applied by vascular laboratories. We compared two vascular laboratories and their duplex ultrasound (DU) machines in terms of their overall diagnostic performance and the optimal criteria to identify patients who have a 70% to 99% stenosis of the internal carotid artery.

METHODS

Measurements of stenosis by DU and angiography were compared for 123 carotid arteries (60 arteries, laboratory A; 63 arteries, laboratory B). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created, and the areas under the ROC curves and the optimal criteria for determining a 70% to 99% stenosis were compared. Multiple regression analysis was used to measure the effect of laboratory on the relationship between angiographic stenosis and DU velocity parameters.

RESULTS

Areas under the ROC curves were similar for both laboratories (0.89 to 0.90, laboratory A; 0.90 to 0.92, laboratory B). However, the optimal criterion for the identification of a 70% to 99% carotid stenosis was different for each laboratory. For most velocity parameters, based on regression analyses, the predicted percent angiographic stenosis for laboratory A was significantly greater than that for laboratory B. In addition, performance differed between the laboratories when established criteria from the literature were applied.

CONCLUSIONS

Two vascular laboratories with similar diagnostic accuracy by ROC analysis have markedly different "optimal" DU criteria. For a given angiographic stenosis, velocities in one laboratory were consistently greater than those in the other laboratory. Laboratory-specific criteria rather than published criteria should be used to identify patients with internal carotid artery stenoses.

Correlation of peak systolic velocity and angiographic measurement of carotid stenosis revisited

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recent observations from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) questioned the reliability of peak systolic velocity (PSV) criteria for grading carotid stenosis. We compared PSV and angiographic measurements at our center together with known physiological relationships to investigate the accuracy of ultrasound.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent both color-coded duplex ultrasound and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography were studied. PSV was determined with angle correction at the site of the tightest internal carotid artery narrowing. Carotid stenosis was measured on angiograms with the North American (N) and common carotid (C) methods. Variables for the stepwise multiple linear regression analysis were selected from an axisymmetrical flow model.

RESULTS

Eighty bifurcations were imaged in 40 patients. PSV did not exceed 140 cm/s in normal vessels. In diseased arteries, PSV increased proportionally with increasing stenosis and decreased to 0 cm/s at occlusion. In stepwise selection of polynomial terms, the linear, quadratic, and cubic correlations of .38, .17, and .22 for N and .45, .24, and .03 for C were found to be significant (P < .02). When only stenosed vessels were evaluated, PSV increase was found with greater scatter for the N measurement: r2 = .73 for N and r2 = .85 for C (n = 50; P = .03 for the difference between two correlated correlation coefficients).

CONCLUSIONS

At our laboratory PSV consistently correlates well with N and C angiographic measurements, as determined with a simple flow model. The complex nature of these correlations and greater variability of the N measurement should be taken into account when data from different centers are compared.

New Doppler parameters for carotid stenosis

The recently published clinical trials of carotid endarterectomy marked a turning point in carotid sonography, because they provided justification for seeking carotid stenosis with ultrasound in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. These trials also were a turning point because they set a new standard for measuring carotid stenosis from arteriograms, based on the comparison of the least diameter of the residual internal carotid artery (ICA) lumen and the diameter of the normal, distal ICA. The adoption of this new standard for arteriographic measurement has necessitated the redefinition of velocity criteria for duplex Doppler diagnosis of ICA stenosis. This article discusses the methods for establishing Doppler velocity criteria for the identification of clinically significant carotid ICA stenosis, based on the new standard for arteriographic measurement.

Consistency of Doppler parameters in predicting arteriographically confirmed carotid stenosis. Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study Investigators

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

While internal carotid peak systolic velocity (IPSV) is reportedly the best Doppler parameter for predicting lower grades of carotid artery stenosis, the internal carotid end-diastolic velocity (IEDV) or the ratio of IPSV to common carotid end-diastolic velocity (CEDV) is helpful in increasing prediction of higher grade stenoses. It is important to examine the consistency of these findings across machine and technician.

METHODS

Using data from 10 devices from the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study, we examined the predictive ability of seven Doppler parameters: IPSV, IEDV, CEDV, common carotid peak systolic velocity (CPSV), and the ratios of IPSV/ CEDV, IEDV/CEDV, and IEDV/CEDV. To assess the agreement between Doppler and arteriography in classifying percent stenosis above or below a given criterion, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating curve, and kappa statistics were obtained from logistic models. The single best Doppler parameter for each of two grades of stenosis (60% and 80%) was determined, and its predictive ability was compared with that of IPSV. The usefulness of IEDV or IPSV/CEDV in addition to IPSV to determine higher grade stenosis was examined.

RESULTS

IPSV was the best predictor in 9 of 10 devices at 60% and in 4 devices at 80% stenosis. When another parameter was better than IPSV, the improvement was minimal. Including IEDV or IPSV/CEDV in addition to IPSV did not notably improve predictive ability.

CONCLUSIONS

IPSV is the single best Doppler parameter for distinguishing severe (> 80%) from less severe carotid stenosis. Information from other Doppler parameters in addition to IPSV is unlikely to be helpful.

Psychological stress and the progression of carotid artery disease

BACKGROUND

We examined the relation between cardiovascular reactivity (the response of the cardiovascular system to psychological stress) and the severity and progression of carotid atherosclerosis.

METHODS

Using duplex ultrasonography, we measured the change in the area of all detectable plaques in the extracranial carotid arteries during 2 years. Cardiovascular reactivity was assessed by measuring changes in hemodynamics during a frustrating cognitive task (the Stroop Color Word Interference Task). Established risk factors for atherosclerosis were measured by interviewing patients, a physical examination, and blood assays for 351 subjects with a wide range of types of atherosclerotic disease.

RESULTS

Atherosclerotic plaques were present in the carotid arteries of 273 (78%) subjects. In a forward stepwise multiple regression analysis, it was found that greater age (beta = 0.46), a history of hypertension (beta = 0.20), use of lipid level-lowering agents (beta = 0.18), a longer history of smoking (beta = 0.13), a larger cholesterol:high-density lipoprotein ratio (beta = 0.13), a smaller change in heart rate during the task (beta = -0.12), and a higher resting systolic blood pressure (SBP; beta = 0.11) were associated significantly with a greater plaque area (R2 = 0.35). In 136 untreated subjects who were followed up for 2 years, a greater change in SBP during the task (beta = 0.28), a higher total cholesterol: high-density lipoprotein ratio (beta = 0.23), a shorter resting preejection period (beta = -0.19), and a lower body mass index (beta = -0.17) were significant predictors of the change in atherosclerosis, after controlling for age and initial plaque area in a stepwise multiple regression analysis (R2 = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the hypothesis that hemodynamic responses under conditions of mental stress may influence the progression of atherosclerosis.

An approach for the use of Doppler ultrasound as a screening tool for hemodynamically significant stenosis (despite heterogeneity of Doppler performance). A multicenter experience. Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study Investigators

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) Doppler validation study assessed the performance of individual Doppler machines across a spectrum of laboratories. We attempted to establish a threshold specific to individual machines to predict angiographically defined hemodynamic stenosis. The reliability of these Doppler ultrasound criteria was prospectively and independently evaluated among patients screened with ultrasound in the ACAS trial.

METHODS

Regression techniques were used to establish the relationship between Doppler velocity and percent stenosis by angiography for 63 specific Doppler machines. This relationship was used to establish a Doppler threshold to provide a 90% positive predictive value (PPV) of a 60% stenosis by angiography. The sensitivity of each Doppler machine to detect a 60% stenosis (at the 90% PPV threshold) was estimated. The efficacy of these Doppler thresholds was then prospectively evaluated by calculating the PPV among ACAS participants eligible by ultrasound.

RESULTS

Of the 63 machines, 13 (21%) had an excellent sensitivity (80%+) at 90% PPV. In 32 devices (51%) only a marginal sensitivity (50% to 80%) could be achieved. In 9 devices (14%) the sensitivity was poor (0% to 50%), and in 9 (14%) no threshold could be established. Despite the heterogeneity of Doppler performance, the standardization program worked as designed in the ACAS trial. Of 825 surgical patients, 399 were eligible by Doppler and 395 subsequently underwent angiography. Of these, 32 (8.1%; 95% confidence interval, 5.4% to 10.8%) did not have hemodynamically significant stenosis by arteriography, a proportion nonsignificantly lower than the planned 10% by the PPV.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of Doppler ultrasound was highly variable. This suggests that Doppler performance is likely overstated in the literature, but specific devices may perform satisfactorily to detect individuals with hemodynamically significant stenosis. Because performance differs substantially among devices, local investigators are strongly urged to maintain local standardization series. With such standardization, ultrasound performance is sufficient for admission to clinical trials and as the is sufficient for admission to clinical trials and as the basis for carotid surgery. However, without quality control many ultrasound machines are not adequate to accurately predict the degree of carotid stenosis and should not be the only test to decide whether surgery is warranted.

Cost-effectiveness of screening for asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic disease

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The value of screening for asymptomatic carotid stenosis has become an important issue with the recently reported beneficial effect of endarterectomy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using Doppler ultrasound as a screening tool to select subjects for arteriography and subsequent surgery.

METHODS

A computer model was developed to simulate the cost-effectiveness of screening a cohort of 1000 men during a 20-year period. The primary outcome measure was incremental present-value dollar expenditures for screening and treatment per incremental present-value quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved. Estimates of disease prevalence and arteriographic and surgical complication rates were obtained from the literature. Probabilities of stroke and death with surgical and medical treatment were obtained from published clinical trials. Doppler ultrasound sensitivity and specificity were obtained through review of local experience. Estimates of costs were obtained from local Medicare reimbursement data.

RESULTS

A one-time screening program of a population with a high prevalence (20%) of > or = 60% stenosis cost $35130 per incremental QALY gained. Decreased surgical benefit or increased annual discount rate was detrimental, resulting in lost QALYs. Annual screening cost $457773 per incremental QALY gained. In a low-prevalence (4%) population, one-time screening cost $52588 per QALY gained, while annual screening was detrimental.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost-effectiveness of a one-time screening program for an asymptomatic population with a high prevalence of carotid stenosis may be cost-effective. Annual screening is detrimental. The most sensitive variables in this simulation model were long-term stroke risk reduction after surgery and annual discount rate for accumulated costs and QALYs.

Who needs surveillance of the contralateral carotid artery?

BACKGROUND

Although the value of carotid endarterectomy has been proven, postoperative surveillance remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the natural history of disease progression in the contralateral carotid artery by duplex surveillance, and to assess the cost of stroke prevention on this contralateral side.

METHODS

Vascular laboratory records were reviewed to identify carotid endarterectomy patients who had two or more duplex studies between 1984 and 1995. Critical stenosis was defined as > or = 75% area reduction.

RESULTS

In all, 324 patients were followed up with duplex scans for 1 month to 11 years (mean 30.3 months). The only factors that correlated with progression to critical stenosis were age and initial stenosis. Overall, 19.5% of patients progressed to critical stenosis within 5 years while the high-risk groups with age > 65 years or initial stenosis > or = 50% progressed to critical disease in 27% and 39%, respectively (P < or = 0.05). The cost per stroke prevented ranged from $143,500 to $418,200 when stratified by initial stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Patients who have undergone a carotid endarterectomy demonstrate a propensity for progression of carotid stenosis in the unoperated (contralateral) artery. The cost/benefit ratio may be improved by varying the intensity of duplex surveillance of the contralateral carotid based on the patient's age and initial degree of stenosis.

Comparison of centralized versus "site-based" measurement of angiographic stenosis for eligibility in the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The authors determine the reliability of centralized versus noncentralized (site-based) measurement of angiographic stenosis of patients enrolled into the multicenter, prospective, Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study by angiographic studies.

METHODS

Percent agreements and correlations of 244 masked and prospectively interpreted angiograms were calculated for comparison of centralized and noncentralized readers measuring the percent carotid stenosis from the same angiographic studies. Univariate summary statistics for differences in percent stenoses were calculated for these readings.

RESULTS

Agreement between readings were 88.5% and 91.8% with kappa statistics of 0.77 and 0.73 for > or = 60% and > or = 80% stenosis, respectively, for comparison of 33 centers to the designated central reader. Comparison between the designated central reader and a second central reader derived percent agreements of 85.0% and 86.5% with kappa statistics of 0.69 and 0.41 for > or = 60% and > or = 80% stenoses, respectively, for arteries selected from the original group. Hence, agreement was slightly better between the enrolling centers and the designated central reader than between the two central readers.

CONCLUSIONS

Both centralized and noncentralized (site-based) methods of angiographic measurement of stenosis are equally reliable for large, prospective, masked, multicenter trials when quality control measures are instituted to ensure uniform application of eligibility criteria.

Determination of sixty percent or greater carotid artery stenosis by duplex Doppler ultrasonography

PURPOSE

The Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study, demonstrating the benefit of carotid endarterectomy for symptom-free patients with 60% or greater carotid artery stenosis, has given rise to the need for development of screening parameters for detection of these lesions. Traditional duplex categories (50% to 79%, 80% to 99%) are not applicable. We sought to develop duplex criteria for determination of 60% or greater carotid artery stenosis by comparison with arteriography.

METHODS

The duplex scans and arteriograms of 110 patients (210 carotid arteries), obtained within 1 month of each other, were reviewed by blinded readers. Arteriographic stenosis was determined by the method of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Duplex measurements of peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) were recorded, and ratios of velocities in the internal and common carotid arteries (ICA, CCA) were calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and accuracy were determined, and receiver-operator characteristic curves were generated.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement for measurement of arteriographic stenosis was "almost perfect" (kappa = 0.86). The criteria determined for detection of 60% or greater stenosis were as follows: PSVICA > 170 cm/sec (sensitivity 98%, specificity 87%, PPV 88%, NPV 98%, accuracy 92%), EDVICA > 40 cm/sec (sensitivity 97%, specificity 52%, PPV 86%, NPV 86%, accuracy 86%), PSVICA/PSVCCA > 2.0 (sensitivity 97%, specificity 73%, PPV 78%, NPV 96%, accuracy 76%), EDVICA/EDVCCA > 2.4 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 80%, PPV 88%, NPV 100%, accuracy 88%). If all of the above criteria were met, 100% accuracy was achieved.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that 60% or greater carotid artery stenosis can be reliably determined by duplex criteria. The use of receiver-operator characteristic curves allows the individualization of duplex criteria appropriate to specific clinical situations of patient screening for lesions (high sensitivity and NPV) or use as a sole preoperative imaging modality (high PPV). Individual vascular laboratories must validate their own results.

Carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients--is contrast angiography necessary? A morbidity analysis

PURPOSE

Findings from the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) indicate that carotid endarterectomy can be beneficial in symptom-free patients with 60% to 99% carotid artery stenosis. However, patients in ACAS who underwent contrast angiography (CA) before carotid endarterectomy were exposed to an additional 1.2% risk of stroke.

METHODS

We used the methods of decision analysis to assess whether the overall 5-year stroke risk in symptom-free patients with suspected carotid artery disease can be reduced by preoperative imaging with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or duplex ultrasonography (DU). We compared four strategies for the preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis in symptom-free patients: 1) CA alone, 2) MRA alone, 3) DU alone, and 4) MRA and DU with CA when the results of these tests disagree. Accuracies of MRA and DU were estimated from 81 patients exposed to all three procedures; stroke risks for patients with 60% to 99% carotid artery stenosis were obtained from ACAS.

RESULTS

For predicting 60% to 99% carotid stenoses, sensitivity and specificity for noninvasive tests, optimized to reduce morbidity, were as follows: DU (0.96, 0.66), MRA (1.00, 0.76), DU/MRA (1.00, 0.86; 26% would require CA). The 5-year stroke risk of these four strategies in order of decreasing benefit was MRA, 6.17%; MRA/DU, 6.34%; DU, 6.35%; and CA, 7.12%. In sensitivity analyses, noninvasive tests were advantageous even if the stroke rate with CA diminished to 0.4%, or if the sensitivity and specificity of noninvasive tests fell to 70%.

CONCLUSION

The preoperative use of noninvasive tests resulted in a lower 5-year stroke risk compared with CA in symptom-free patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis.

Management of transient ischaemic attacks and stroke

The management of stroke and transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs) has changed greatly in the last two decades. The importance of good blood pressure control is the hallmark of stroke prevention. Large multicentre trials have proven beyond doubt the value of aspirin in TIAs, warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and embolic cerebrovascular symptoms, and carotid endarterectomy in patients with carotid TIAs. There seems little doubt that patients managed in acute stroke units are more likely to be independent at six months than those managed in a general medical ward. This article emphasizes the importance of basing clinical management on simple history taking and examination and appropriate investigation. This, combined with knowledge of the natural history risk of TIA and stroke and the results of randomised trials, allows individuals to be managed in the most appropriate manner. This review is designed to be a practical guide, useful in the day to day management of patients with cerebrovascular disease.

Ultrasonography for diagnosis and management of carotid artery atherosclerosis. A position paper of the American Society of Neuroimaging

The importance of identifying patients with carotid artery stenosis has attained greater significance in light of recent treatment trials of the efficacy of medical and surgical treatment of both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Doppler and B-mode ultrasonography can accurately diagnose and quantify stenosis at the cervical carotid artery bifurcation. The development of duplex color-flow instruments has enhanced the sensitivity and specificity of this examination. Ultrasonography should be employed as an initial examination to identify patients with carotid artery stenosis and determine whether further evaluation or treatment is necessary.

Imaging blood vessels of the head and neck

ATHEROSCLEROTIC DISEASE: Patients with transient ischaemic attacks or a non-disabling stroke who are surgical candidates should be screened with Doppler ultrasound, or MRA/CT, or both. The choice will depend on local expertise and availability. If DUS is used it is recommended that the equipment is regularly calibrated and a prospective audit of results, particularly of those patients that go on to angiography, is maintained locally. Those patients found to have the DUS equivalent of a 50% stenosis should have angiography only if surgical or balloon angioplasty treatment is contemplated. Angiography should be performed with meticulous technique to minimise risks. ANEURYSM AND ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS: Angiography remains the investigation of choice for patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Magnetic resonance angiography and CT can demonstrate the larger aneurysm but because even small aneurysms can rupture with devastating effects, these techniques are not the examination of first choice. Angiography is also the only technique that adequately defines the neck of an aneurysm. This information is becoming increasingly important in management decisions-for instance, whether to clip or use a coil. Likewise angiography is the only technique to fully define the vascular anatomy of arteriovenous malformations although the size of the nidus can be monitored by MRA and this is a useful method of follow up after stereotactic radiosurgery, embolisation, or surgery. There are specific uses for MRA such as in patients presenting with a painful 3rd nerve palsy and as a screening test for those patients with a strong family history of aneurysms. VASCULITIS, FIBROMUSCULAR HYPERPLASIA, AND DISSECTION: These rare arterial diseases are best detected by angiography, although there are increasing reports of successful diagnosis by MRA. There are traps for the many unwary and MRA does not give an anatomical depiction of the arteries but a flow map. Slow flow may lead to signal loss and a false positive diagnosis of vasculitis.

Duplex accuracy compared with angiography in the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Trial for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Duplex ultrasonography is frequently used for noninvasive screening for extracranial occlusive disease. In a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial for carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients, the duplex ultrasound examination was compared with conventional angiographic findings for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis in 178 patients. Angiograms were interpreted by radiologists both at local medical centers and at a central site; the angiographic determination of ICA stenosis was calculated as percent diameter at the point of maximal narrowing compared with the normal distal ICA. Comparisons were made for 328 arteries, including both the symptomatic (> 50% stenosis determined by angiography) and the asymptomatic (variable degrees of stenosis) sides. Duplex ultrasonography sensitivity varied from 0.24 for 30 to 49% stenosis to 0.71 for 50 to 79% stenosis and 0.91 for ICA occlusion. Using a 50% stenosis cutpoint, duplex ultrasonography sensitivity was 0.90 with a specificity of 0.76. Duplex scan readings underestimated the degree of stenosis in the 30 to 49% stenosis group in 48% of the cases. There was no apparent relationship between the accuracy of stenosis determinations and that of external carotid artery stenosis, carotid plaque morphology, or ulceration determinations by ultrasound. On the basis of the benefit provided by carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade lesions, duplex ultrasound accuracy is essential if noninvasive testing is used to make clinical decisions. In situations in which duplex findings may not be reliable, such as in the mild-to-moderate stenosis and occlusion categories, carotid angiography may be indicated.

Drugs and surgery in the prevention of ischemic stroke

Randomized clinical trials have proved that warfarin therapy decreases the risk of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and in those who have had a myocardial infarction. In patients who are not candidates for long-term anticoagulant therapy, aspirin is beneficial, but the reduction in risk is smaller with aspirin than with warfarin. In patients with cerebral ischemic symptoms of noncardiac origin, aspirin and ticlopidine reduce the risk of stroke, but the benefit is modest. Given alone, neither dipyridamole nor sulfinpyrazone prevents stroke. The question remains whether either of these drugs plus aspirin is better than aspirin alone. The optimal dose of aspirin for stroke prevention has not been established. Carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of stroke in symptomatic patients with at least 70 percent stenosis, as determined by arteriography. Current trials are addressing the question of whether endarterectomy is beneficial for patients with moderate degrees of carotid stenosis. The benefit of endarterectomy for patients with asymptomatic carotid lesions remains unclear.

Carotid endarterectomy for patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis

The investigators of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study are reporting the interim results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of carotid endarterectomy in patients who have asymptomatic carotid stenosis of greater than 60% reduction in diameter. In addition to aspirin and aggressive management of modifiable risk factors, one-half of the patients were randomly assigned to receive surgery after angiograhic confirmation of the lesion. Carotid endarterectomy is beneficial with a statistically significant absolute reduction of 5.8% in the risk of the primary end point of stroke within 5 years and a relative risk reduction of 55%. As a consequence of the trial reaching statistical significance in favor of endarterectomy, and on the recommendation of the study's data monitoring committee, physicians participating in the study were immediately notified and advised to reevaluate patients who did not receive surgery. It is important to note that the success of the operation depends on medical centers and surgeons who have a documented perioperative morbidity and mortality of less than 3%, careful selection of patients, and postoperative management of modifiable risk factors.

Clinical advisory: carotid endarterectomy for patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis

The investigators of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) are reporting the interim results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of carotid endarterectomy in patients who have asymptomatic carotid stenosis of greater than 60% reduction in diameter. In addition to aspirin and aggressive management of modifiable risk factors, one half of the patients were randomly assigned to receive surgery after angiographic confirmation of the lesion. Carotid endarterectomy is beneficial with a statistically significant absolute reduction of 5.8% in the risk of the primary end point of stroke within 5 years and a relative risk reduction of 55%. As a consequence of the trial reaching statistical significance in favor of endarterectomy, and on the recommendation of the study's data monitoring committee, physicians participating in the study were immediately notified and advised to reevaluate patients who did not receive surgery. It is important to note that the success of the operation is dependent on medical centers and surgeons who have a documented perioperative morbidity and mortality of less than 3%, careful selection of patients, and postoperative management of modifiable risk factors.

Transient ischemic attack and minor ischemic stroke: an algorithm for evaluation and treatment. Mayo Clinic Division of Cerebrovascular Diseases

OBJECTIVE

To report a cost-effective and scientifically based algorithm for the clinical assessment and treatment of patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ischemic stroke.

DESIGN

We comprehensively reviewed the literature on the epidemiologic features, assessment approaches, and treatment recommendations for ischemic cerebrovascular disease and developed an algorithm by using the available clinical and research data to support all decision-making steps.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For patients with TIA or minor ischemic stroke, the appropriate setting for investigation (inpatient or outpatient), suggested diagnostic tests, use of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, and indications for surgical treatment are reviewed.

RESULTS

Although stroke is a common cause of death and lost productivity in the United States, the clinical assessment of patients with TIA or minor ischemic stroke has lacked consistency. The simplified algorithm clarifies patients who may be candidates for hospitalization and possible anticoagulation therapy. Initial diagnostic studies should include computed tomography of the head without use of a contrast agent, which quickly distinguishes nonhemorrhagic from hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease. Evolving noninvasive studies of the cerebral vasculature are providing increasingly sensitive means of detecting stenoses, yet cerebral angiography remains the "gold standard." Treatment options depend on the pathophysiologic findings on diagnostic evaluation.

CONCLUSION

The assessment of patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease is complex. The simplified algorithmic approach reported herein necessitates entry of appropriate patients into the algorithm. Because of clinical heterogeneity, an algorithm may apply to a wide spectrum of patients but will not cover every situation; hence, evaluation must be guided by a patient's unique history and findings on examination and by the physician's clinical experience.

Accurate measurement of carotid stenosis. Chaos in methodology

The methods used for measurement of carotid artery stenosis are not uniform. Witness the chaos that developed when the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) group changed its classification system from area to linear measurements only to discover that the European Carotid Stenosis Trial (ECST) used still another angiographic definition of degree of stenosis so that the data from the two studies were not comparable. Fortunately, this has been reconciled by recalculation of the data. In still other studies, using unvalidated ultrasound instruments has made it difficult or impossible to compare results. In part, these problems have been the result of misdirected attempts to amalgamate concepts from Doppler and duplex ultrasound with those of arteriography. The former is more precise and accurate than the latter, yet its methodology is harder to apply and has not been generally distributed. Even such anatomical terms as "carotid bulb" are not standard. Ultrasonographers consider it to be the distal common carotid artery, to vascular surgeons it is the carotid sinus, while still others consider it to be both or neither. The present authors advocate a uniform methodology utilizing duplex ultrasound and predict that it plus magnetic resonance angiography will become the standard by which extracranial carotid artery disease is evaluated in the future.