Low prevalence of long-term complications in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in France: a multicenter study. CODIAB-INSERM-ZENECA Pharma Study Group

Prevalence of peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

We aimed to determine pooled prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in patients with diabetes and to explore the impacts of research variables on prevalence estimates.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and Scopus from onset up to July 2018 to identify articles investigating the prevalence of DPN. Random-effects models were used to calculate the pooled prevalence of DPN. The heterogeneity of the study was estimated with the I² statistic. The publication bias was described by Egger's test and funnel plot.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies with a total of 50,112 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the pooled prevalence of DPN was 30% (95% confidence interval, CI 25-34%). The pooled prevalence of DPN among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus was higher than patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (31.5%, 95% CI 24.4-38.6% vs 17.5%, 95% CI 4.8-30.2%). The pooled prevalence of DPN of studies involving a mixed type of diabetes mellitus was 24.8% (95% CI 13.1-36.5%, I²=99.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Medical staff should strengthen the evaluation and diagnosis of DPN. Moreover, they need to teach diabetic patients how to prevent this complication.

Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in North-East Poland

Background and Objectives: The global epidemic of diabetes, especially type 2 (DM2), is related to lifestyle changes, obesity, and the process of population aging. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most serious complication of the eye caused by diabetes. The aim of this research was to assess the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in north-east Poland. Materials and Methods: The eye fundus was assessed on the basis of two-field 50 degrees color fundus photographs that showed the optic nerve and macula in the center after the pupil was dilated with 1% tropicamide. Results: The experimental group included 315 (26%) patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) and 894 (74%) patients with DM2. DM1 patients were diagnosed with DR in 32.58% of cases, with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) in 24.44% of cases, proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in 1.59% of cases, diabetic macular edema (DME) in 5.40% of cases, and PDR with DME in 0.95% of cases. DR was found in DM2 patients in 23.04% of cases, NPDR in 17.11% of cases, PDR in 1.01% of cases, DME in 4.81% of cases, and PDR with DME in 0.11% of cases. Conclusions: The presented study is the first Polish study on the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy presenting a large group of patients, and its results could be extrapolated to the whole country. Diabetic retinopathy was found in 25.48% of patients in the whole experimental group. The above results place Poland within the European average, indicating the quality of diabetic care offered in Poland, based on the number of observed complications.

Prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis of orthostatic hypotension in diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a major clinical sign of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in diabetic patients. Our aim was to quantitatively evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of OH in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and assess its prognosis.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Chinese Journal, Wanfang, and SINOMED databases was conducted for related published work up to September 25, 2016, and manually searched eligible studies from the references in accordance with the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

We included 21 studies in the analysis, with a total sample size of 13,772. The pooled prevalence of OH in DM was 24% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19-28%). Potential risk factors, that is, glycosylated hemoglobin A (HbA1c) (odds ratio [OR], 1.13, 95% CI, 1.07-1.20), hypertension (OR, 1.02, 95% CI, 1.01-1.02), and diabetic nephropathy (OR, 2.37, 95% CI, 1.76-3.19), were significantly associated with OH in DM. In addition, the prognosis of OH in DM was associated with higher risk of total mortality and cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSION

The pooled prevalence of OH in DM appears high. HbA1c, hypertension, and diabetic nephropathy are risk factors for OH in DM. OH indicates poor prognosis in diabetic patients. Attention should be focused on diabetic patients with the stated risk factors to prevent OH.

Risk Factors and Comorbidities in Diabetic Neuropathy: An Update 2015

Distal symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) is the most common neurological manifestation in diabetes. Major risk factors of DSPN include diabetes duration, hyperglycemia, and age, followed by prediabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity. Height, smoking, insulin resistance, hypoinsulinemia, and others represent an additional risk. Importantly, hyperglycemia, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and smoking are modifiable. Stringent glycemic control has been shown to be effective in type 1, but not to the same extent in type 2 diabetes. Antilipidemic treatment, especially with fenofibrate, and multi-factorial intervention have produced encouraging results, but more experience is necessary. The major comorbidities of DSPN are depression, autonomic neuropathy, peripheral arterial disease, cardiovascular disease, nephropathy, retinopathy, and medial arterial calcification. Knowledge of risk factors and comorbidities has the potential to enrich the therapeutic strategy in clinical practice as part of the overall medical care for patients with neuropathy. This article provides an updated overview of DSPN risk factors and comorbidities.

Assessment of microalbuminuria and albumin creatinine ratio in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIM

We aimed to evaluate the levels of urine microalbumin, urine albumin creatinine ratio, plasma creatinine and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) among type 2 diabetic patients and assessed the correlation between microalbuminuria and plasma creatinine levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review study was conducted at Department of Clinical Chemistry, King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, during August to December 2014. The study included 100 male and female patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and excluding patients with type 1 DM. Medical history and biochemical laboratory data were obtained from medical records and from biochemistry laboratory database.

RESULTS

Increase in mean level of plasma creatinine (138 μmol/L), urine microalbuminuria (240 mg/L), albumin creatinine ratio (82) and HbA1c (8.7%) was observed among type 2 DM patients. Moderate positive correlation was observed between microalbuminuria and urine albumin creatinine ratio (r = 0.509 P = 0.0006) and between urine albumin creatinine ratio and plasma creatinine (r = 0.553 P = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

We concluded that type 2 DM patients who are at risk of developing renal impairment must be regularly monitored for microalbuminuria, urine albumin creatinine ratio, and HbA1c levels.

Diabetes in Europe: an update

Diabetes is among the leading causes of death in the IDF Europe Region (EUR), continues to increase in prevalence with diabetic macro- and microvascular complications resulting in increased disability and enormous healthcare costs. In 2013, the number of people with diabetes is estimated to be 56 million in EUR with an overall estimated prevalence of 8.5%. However, estimates of diabetes prevalence in 2013 vary widely in the 56 diverse countries in EUR from 2.4% in Moldova to 14.9% in Turkey. Trends in diabetes prevalence also vary between countries with stable prevalence since 2002 for many countries but a doubling of diabetes prevalence in Turkey. For 2035, a further increase of nearly 10 million people with diabetes is projected for the EUR. Prevalence of type 1 has also increased over the past 20 years in EUR and there was estimated to be 129,350 cases in children aged 0-14 years in 2013. Registries provide valid information on incidence of type 1 diabetes with more complete data available for children than for adults. There are large differences in distribution of risk factors for diabetes at the population level in EUR. Modifiable risk factors such as obesity, physical inactivity, smoking behaviour (including secondhand smoking), environmental pollutants, psychosocial factors and socioeconomic deprivation could be tackled to reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes in Europe. In addition, diabetes management is a major challenge to health services in the European countries. Improved networking practices of health professionals and other stakeholders in combination with empowerment of people with diabetes and continuous quality monitoring need to be further developed in Europe.

Prevalence and incidence of retinopathy in elderly diabetic patients receiving early diagnosis and treatment

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the most common and specific complications of diabetes. Thus, intervention is required to lower the incidence and prevalence of sight-threatening retinopathy. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and incidence of diabetic retinopathy in elderly diabetic patients receiving early diagnosis and proper treatment and to explore risk factors for DR. From May 2005 to May 2011, fundus examination was performed for elderly diabetic patients during routine medical examinations. The presence of a microaneurysm or more severe presentations was used to diagnose DR, which was followed by fundus fluorescein angiography. Logistic regression analysis was employed to analyze the risk factors for DR development within 5 years. A total of 2,194 diabetic patients were recruited and followed-up for a mean of 5.8 years. The prevalence of DR was 15.38–16.20% and the incidence of DR was 8.38/1,000 person-years. Logistic multiple stepwise regression revealed that fasting plasma glucose (FPG), mean arterial pressure (MAP), duration of diabetes, body mass index (BMI) and microalbuminuria (MAU) were significantly associated with the occurrence of DR (all P<0.05). In the present study, the prevalence and incidence of DM were higher compared with those reported in the general population; however, the prevalence and incidence of DR were lower compared with those reported in similar studies. This suggests that favorable control of blood glucose, blood pressure and blood lipids effectively prevents the occurrence of DR in diabetic patients.

Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in various ethnic groups: a worldwide perspective

The alarming rise in diabetes prevalence is a global public health and economic problem. Diabetic retinopathy is the most common complication of diabetes and the leading cause of blindness among working-age populations in the Western world. Screening and prompt treatment of diabetic retinopathy are not top priorities in many regions of the world, because the impacts of other causes of preventable blindness remain an issue. Ethnicity is a complex, independent risk factor for diabetic retinopathy. Observations from white populations cannot be extrapolated fully to other ethnic groups. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy, sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy, and clinically significant macular edema are higher in people of South Asian, African, Latin American, and indigenous tribal descent compared to the white population. Although all ethnic groups are susceptible to the established risk factors of diabetic retinopathy-such as length of exposure and severity of hyperglycemia, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia-ethnic-specific risk factors also may influence these rates. Such risk factors may include differential susceptibility to conventional risk factors, insulin resistance, differences in anthropometric measurements, truncal obesity, urbanization, variations in access to healthcare systems, genetic susceptibility, and epigenetics. The rates of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy appear to be declining in the United States, supporting the observation that better medical management of diabetes and prompt treatment of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy substantially improve the long-term diabetic retinopathy incidence; studies from other parts of the world are limited and do not mirror this finding, however. We examine the ethnicity and region-based prevalence of diabetic retinopathy around the world and highlight the need to reinforce ethnicity-based screening and treatment thresholds in diabetic retinopathy.

Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and cataract in adult patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in Russia

AIM

The aim of the study was to identify the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic cataract (DC) in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients within the Russian Federation. Also, the stage of DR at the time of its identification and the proportion of new cases diagnosed with DR or DC were to be determined.

METHODS

A random sample of 7,186 adult patients with diabetes was screened for DR and DC using fundoscopy and fundus photography. Levels of HbA1c, total cholesterol, triglycerides, creatinine and urinary albumin excretion rate were assessed.

RESULTS

In diabetic patients, the prevalence of DR and DC was 45.9% and 30.6%, respectively. These complications appeared significantly more frequently in patients with type 1 diabetes than in type 2 diabetes. The prevalence of background, preproliferative and proliferative DR among diabetic patients was 28.1%, 8.1%, and 6.7%, respectively. Patients with DR were older, had a longer duration of diabetes, higher HbA1c, elevated plasma total cholesterol, increased triglicerides, and higher systolic BP, compared with patients without DR. Microalbuminuria and proteinuria were more prevalent among patients with DR compared with non-DR patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that diabetic retinopathy and cataract are wide-spread complications among diabetic patients in Russia. However, the disease course is more aggressive and accelerated in patients with type 1 diabetes than in those having type 2 diabetes. Therefore, it is important to prevent DR by identifying diabetes and signs of retinopathy at the earliest possible stage of progression for timely and adequate retina laser coagulation or surgical treatment, compensation of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, and normalization of blood glucose and pressure.

Population-based study on the prevalence and risk factors of orthostatic hypotension in subjects with pre-diabetes and diabetes

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between pre-diabetes and orthostatic hypotension and to examine the prevalence and correlates of orthostatic hypotension in community dwellers with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), pre-diabetes, and diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

All participants were classified as having NGT (n = 1,069), pre-diabetes (n = 412), or diabetes (n = 157). Orthostatic hypotension was defined as a decline in systolic/diastolic blood pressure of > or =20/10 mmHg when an individual changed from a supine to a standing position. The cardiovagal response to standing was the ratio between the longest RR interval around beat 30 and the shortest RR interval around beat 15 after standing (30 max-to-15 min ratio).

RESULTS

The prevalences of orthostatic hypotension were 13.8, 17.7, and 25.5% in subjects with NGT, pre-diabetes, and diabetes, respectively. For all subjects, age, diabetes, hypertension, and a decreased 30 max-to-15 min ratio, but not pre-diabetes, were independently associated with orthostatic hypotension. Age, hypertension, and 30 max-to-15 min ratio were the correlates of orthostatic hypotension in NGT subjects. Age and hypertension were related to orthostatic hypotension in pre-diabetic subjects. A1C and hypertension were the determinants of orthostatic hypotension in diabetic subjects. Supine blood pressure was related to orthostatic hypotension in all subjects and subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-diabetic subjects do not have a higher risk of orthostatic hypotension than subjects with NGT, although the risk of orthostatic hypotension is higher in diabetic subjects. Hypertension and supine blood pressure were risk factors for orthostatic hypotension in both pre-diabetic and diabetic subjects. Age and A1C were the correlates of orthostatic hypotension in pre-diabetic and diabetic subjects, respectively. The cardiovagal response to standing is an important determinant of orthostatic hypotension in subjects with NGT but not in pre-diabetic and diabetic subjects.

OPHDIAT: a telemedical network screening system for diabetic retinopathy in the Ile-de-France

OBJECTIVE

International and national guidelines recommend an annual funduscopic examination for all diabetic patients, but such annual fundus examinations are not sufficiently performed in France. Non-mydriatic fundus photography is a valid method of evaluation for diabetic retinopathy (DR) and a viable alternative to ophthalmoscopy. After two pilot studies demonstrated the feasibility of telemedical screening for diabetic retinopathy in both hospital and primary-care settings, we developed a regional telemedical network, OPHDIAT, designed to facilitate access to regular annual evaluations of patients with diabetes while saving medical time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

OPHDIAT comprises peripheral screening centres equipped with non-mydriatic cameras, where fundus photographs are taken by technicians linked by telemedicine to a reference centre, where ophthalmologists grade the images. Currently in the Ile-de-France region, 16 screening centres are linked through a central server to an ophthalmologic reading centre and includes 11 centres located in the diabetes departments of 11 hospitals, one diabetic retinopathy screening centre located in northern Paris, three in healthcare centres and one in a prison.

RESULTS

During the 28-month evaluation period, 15,307 DR screening examinations were performed. Retinal photographs of at least one eye could not be graded in 1332 patients (9.7%) and diabetic retinopathy was detected in 3350 patients (23.4%). After the screening examination, 3478 patients (25.2%) were referred to an ophthalmologist for either DR, cataract and/or non-gradable photographs.

CONCLUSION

Fundus photography combined with telemedicine has the potential to improve the regular annual evaluation for diabetic retinopathy. The organization of the network around a central reading centre serves to guarantee quality control.

To what extent should we lower HbA1c in diabetic subjects?

Current recommendations regarding glycemic control suggest that HbA(1c) should be lower than 6.5%. This is supported by data regarding microvascular disease, namely retinopathy rather than nephropathy. The question is not completely solved regarding cardiovascular diseases, where a strategy of very low HbA(1c) ("the lower the better") is expected to be effective. Some ongoing studies will help to answer these unsolved questions.

Diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy among patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom

AIMS

The objective of this study was to describe the proportion and characteristics of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes diagnosed with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (UK).

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was administered to general practitioners and diabetes specialists. Existing physicians' records were used to quantify the frequency of DPN diagnoses, and notes from patients' medical charts were used to characterize symptoms.

RESULTS

The average number of physicians per country was 41 (range of 34-49). The proportion of diabetes patients diagnosed with DPN ranged from 9.6% (95% CI, 7.1-12.2) in Spain to 23.1% (95% CI, 15.4-30.7) in Italy. Of 913 DPN study patients, 55.0% were male, and 78.5% had type 2 diabetes. Mean age was 64.5+/-12.5 years. A DPN diagnosis was based primarily on symptoms. Approximately 27% of patients had no documented neurological examination. "Prickling" was the most common DPN symptom recorded in France, Italy, and Spain, and "numbness" was the most common in the UK.

CONCLUSIONS

Country-specific estimates of DPN diagnosis may reflect clinical management of diabetes and DPN. A substantial number of diagnoses were not associated with a record of a neurological examination.

Estimated prevalence of peripheral neuropathy and associated pain in adults with diabetes in France

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the point prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and pain associated with DPN (pDPN) in French adults with diabetes and compare severity of symptoms across demographic subpopulations.

DESIGN

The participant-administered portion of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) and selected items of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) formed part of a computer-aided telephone survey posed to a representative, random sample of French households from March 1, 2005 to April 30, 2005. Questions from the MNSI and the BPI were used to assess the point prevalence of DPN and pDPN in French adults with self-reported diabetes.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study sample was 68 years (SD = 15), the mean duration of diabetes was 15 years (SD = 12) and 56% of participants were female. The prevalence rates of DPN and pDPN in French adults with diabetes were 11 and 8%, respectively. The average age and diabetes duration of participants with DPN and pDPN were not different from participants in the total sample. Among those participants with pDPN, 35% classified their pain as severe, 49% as moderate, and 17% as mild. The prevalence of DPN was higher in participants with type 1 diabetes (14%) than those with type 2 (9%). Among participants with DPN, 88% with severe pain received pain treatment compared to 71% with moderate pain and 58% with mild pain. The most significant limitation of this study is the lack of validation for administering only a portion of the MNSI, but other limitations include the imprecision associated with self-reported questionnaires, a survey sample that does not include participants with undiagnosed diabetes, and a bias toward elderly participants.

CONCLUSION

This study concluded that 8% of participants with diabetes in France had pDPN.

Diagnosed diabetic retinopathy in France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom

AIM

The objective of this study was to describe the proportion and characteristics of patients diagnosed with diabetic retinopathy (DR) in France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (UK).

METHODS

To estimate the proportion of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes diagnosed with DR, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of general practitioners in each country using physician records. In addition, diabetes specialists were recruited in Italy and Spain. We extracted data from the medical notes of a sample of DR patients to characterize DR severity and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

The average number of physicians per country was 41 (range: 34-49). The proportion of diagnosed DR ranged from 10.3% (95% CI, 6.7-14.0%) in Spain to 19.6% (95% CI, 16.0-23.1%) in the UK. Of 752 DR patients studied, 53.9% were male; mean age (+/-SD) was 64.2+/-12.8 years. Consistently across countries, mild non-proliferative DR was the most common severity level of diagnosed DR. Proliferative DR (PDR) ranged from 19.7% (France) to 31.5% (UK). Diabetic macular oedema was reported in approximately 10% of patients. Hypertension (73.1%), dyslipidemia (63.2%), and neuropathy (52.1%) were the most common co-morbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Country-specific prevalence of diagnosed DR may reflect clinical management of diabetes, healthcare systems, or record-keeping accuracy. Across countries, up to 30% of DR patients had a diagnosis of PDR, which could suggest that patients are diagnosed only when their disease is advanced.

Control of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care. The gap between guidelines and reality in Spain

To evaluate the level and factors affecting control of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes (TYPE 2 DM) patients. Multicentre cross-sectional study: a sample of 430 primary care practices across Spain selected 1907 type 2 diabetic patients. The first five consecutive ambulatory patients with TYPE 2 DM were eligible for the inclusion into the survey. Patients were free of known cardiovascular disease (CVD). Control criteria were defined based on 2002 American Diabetes Association (ADA) clinical practice recommendations. A total of 1907 patients (51% women) aged 63 +/- 9 years. Smoking prevalence was 22.6%, 50.6% had levels of A1c < 7%. Mean blood pressure (BP) was 148 +/- 17/86 +/- 10 mmHg. Only 7.8% have achieved the target of BP < 130/80 mmHg. Among the 1180 patients (65%) treated for hypertension, this target was attained in only 4.4% of patients. A measurement for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was available in 1669 patients (88%). Only 5.9% of patients achieved the target of LDL < 100 mg/dl. Among the 638 patients (41.6%) on drug treatment for dyslipidaemia, this target was attained in only 5.6% of patients. Among type 2 diabetic patients in Spain the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors is high. Control of glycaemia, smoking, BP and LDL are far from optimal despite the widespread use of guidelines for the management of diabetes and CVD. The application of published recommendations needs to be reinforced.

Preserving cardiac function in the hypertensive patient: why renal parameters hold the key

The relationship between cardiovascular and renal pathologies is well recognized in advanced nephropathy and heart failure, but in early disease it has received less attention. Consequently, microalbuminuria screening and interventions that treat early nephropathy remain under-utilized cardioprotective strategies in the hypertensive patient. Agents that delay the progression of renal disease are likely to be cardioprotective by lessening the systemic consequences of renal dysfunction and may have additional cardioprotective effects by exerting beneficial effects on endothelia elsewhere in the body and within the heart. A critical driving factor within both renal and wider cardiovascular pathologies is overactivation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Accordingly, RAAS-directed antihypertensive agents including both angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been demonstrated to have renoprotective effects. In major prospective trials, two ARBs, losartan and irbesartan, have been demonstrated to be renoprotective in patients with frank proteinuria, and one ARB, irbesartan, has been shown to have renoprotective properties in patients with microalbuminuria. For patients with incipient or frank renal dysfunction, an aggressive RAAS-based approach to hypertension management, combining potent blood pressure control with proven renoprotection, may therefore constitute a key component of therapy targeted towards long-term cardioprotection.

Evaluation of a screening program for diabetic retinopathy in a primary care setting Dodia (Dépistage ophtalmologique du diabète) study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) using eye fundus photography taken by a nonmydriatic camera and transmitted trough the Internet to an ophthalmological reading centre, as compared to a dilated eye examination performed by an ophthalmologist.

METHODS

A total of 456 and 426 diabetic patients were included by two different groups of primary care physicians (PCPs), 358 being screened with the non-mydriatic camera (experimental group) and 320 with dilated eye fundus exam (control group).

RESULTS

The proportion of screened patients for whom PCPs received a screening report within the 6-month follow-up period was 74,1% for the experimental group and 71,5% for the control group. Screening for DR was negative in 77,6% of patients with eye fundus photographs vs 89,6% with dilated eye examination. DR was diagnosed in 62 patients (17,3%) with eye fundus photographs versus 31 with dilated eye examination (10,4%). Referral to an ophthalmologist was required in 59 reports of patients with photographs (16.5%), 23 of them due to high grade DR. Finally, the non-mydriatic camera was found of little inconvenience by patients.

CONCLUSION

The telemedical approach to DR screening proved to be effective in providing primary care practitioners with information about their patient's eye status. This screening method allowed to identify patients requiring prompt referral to the ophthalmologist for further complete eye examination. In conclusion, this study provided successful results of DR screening using fundus photography in primary care patients, and strongly supports the need to further extend this screening program in a larger number of French sites.

Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy and macular oedema: a systematic review

AIMS

To systematically review the literature on the prevalence and incidence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and macular oedema (MO).

METHODS

A search of the bibliographic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL) was conducted up to October 2001. Selected relevant studies were scrutinized and included in the review.

RESULTS

A total of 359 studies were included. The studies were reported in nearly 100 different journals and in over 50 countries. The majority of the studies were US-based, with large studies such as the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy dominating the literature. The studies were quite dated and highly heterogeneous in nature in terms of patient selection with variable inclusion criteria (age range, gender, diabetes duration and type, ethnicity, comorbidity, and DR status, assessment, and classification).

CONCLUSIONS

There are inconsistencies between epidemiological studies, and differences in study methods may contribute to conflicting reports of prevalence and incidence of DR and MO in diabetic populations. As new therapies for DR and its associated complications emerge, the need to capture and monitor new epidemiological data becomes increasingly important to be able to assess the impact and effectiveness of these therapies. Robust, longitudinal capture of patient data is, therefore, essential to evaluate the impact of current practice on the epidemiology of diabetic eye complications.

Management of French patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in medical general practice: report of the Mediab observatory

OBJECTIVES

The Mediab study was conducted to estimate the medical care in French patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus managed by general practitioners on an ambulatory basis, but consIdered as requiring new treatment implementation.

METHODS

Five thousand one hundred and fourty eight diabetic patients without any treatment or treated with lifestyle measures either alone or combined with an oral antIdiabetic agent given as monotherapy were included in a cross-sectional study that was conducted on a nationwIde basis by using the ORP (R) methodology. The 4088 patients in whom HbA1c was determined with a reliable method were further classified into 3 categories according to whether HbA1c was<=6.5% (group I, n=525), ranging between 6.6 and 8% (group II, n=1699) or > 8% (group III, n=1864).

RESULTS

A large proportion of patients (45.6%) exhibited HbA1c > 8%. Adherence to diet and regular physical activity were progressively decreasing while prevalence of diabetic complications was steadily increasing from group I to III, i.e. when diabetic control was worsening. The complications suffered from severe "underreporting". When complications were reported, the odds-ratio analysis showed that retinopathy is influenced by both the magnitude of glucose excess and the diabetes duration, while renal diseases and macroangiopathy depend mainly on diabetes duration. 38.1% of patients visited a diabetologist, but most of these patients were referred to the speciaList after the inclusion visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the development of guIdelines, a large percentage of patients remains poorly-controlled. Future actions should be based on: (i) better collaboration between general practitioners and diabetologists (ii) better detection of complications that suffer from severe "underreporting", (iii) reinforcement of lifestyle recommendations and of pharmacological treatments by shifting from mono- to multi-drug therapy, at earlier stages of the disease.

[Quality of life assessment of type 2 diabetic patients in general medicine]

OBJECTIVE

The QUODIEM study assessed the quality of life of type II diabetic patients and the factors that influenced it, according to recent medical recommendations. Method The quality of life (QOL) of 437 type II diabetic patients in the Rhone-Alps area, monitored in general medicine, was assessed using two QOL questionaires, the SF 36, a generic, and the DQOL, a specific questionnaire that we adapted to type II diabetics. A third questionnaire assessed the wishes of the patients concerning the management of their disease.

RESULTS

The QOL of type II diabetics is negatively influenced by age (>75 Years), female gender, loneliness, and the absence of professional or physical activity. A poorly balanced diabetes, its management by a specialist, the presence of two complications or more related to the disease, and treatment with insulin were all factors reducing QOL. Self-management of glycaema was associated with improved QOL. Few patients wished enhanced management of their diabetes.

CONCLUSION

The QUODIEM study underlined the fact that the QOL of type II diabetics must be taken into account and tools for its assessment are available in France.

Angiotensin-I-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism and high urinary albumin concentration in French Type 2 diabetes patients

AIMS

Family-based studies suggest a genetic basis for nephropathy in Type 2 diabetes. The angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE) gene is a candidate gene for Type 1 diabetes nephropathy. We assessed the association between high urinary albumin concentration and ACE insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism, in French Type 2 diabetes patients.

METHODS

We studied 3139 micro/macroalbuminuric French patients recruited in the DIABHYCAR Study, an ACE inhibition trial in Type 2 diabetes patients with renal and cardiovascular outcomes. The main inclusion criteria were age >/= 50 years, urinary albumin concentration >/= 20 mg/l assessed centrally during two consecutive screening visits, and plasma creatinine concentration </= 150 micro mol/l. These patients were compared with 605 normoalbuminuric (NA; urinary albumin concentration < 10 mg/l at first screening for the DIABHYCAR Study) French patients. ACE I/D genotype was determined by nested polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

The ACE I/D polymorphism was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The distribution of genotypes did not differ significantly between micro/macroalbuminuric and NA patients: 552 and 115 II, 1468 and 282 ID, 1119 and 208 DD (P = 0.67). However, the ACE D allele was more frequent among normotensive micro/macroalbuminuric patients than among NA patients (P = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

The ACE I/D polymorphism was not associated with high urinary albumin concentration in French Type 2 diabetes patients.

The prevalence of and factors associated with diabetic retinopathy in the Australian population

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence and factors associated with diabetic retinopathy in the Australian population and to estimate the time difference between disease onset and clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle study (AusDiab) included 11,247 adults aged > or =25 years in 42 randomly selected areas of Australia. Retinopathy was assessed in participants identified as having diabetes (based on self-report and oral glucose tolerance test), impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance and in a random sample with normal glucose tolerance. Data were available for 2,177 participants.

RESULTS

Overall, 15.3% of those with diabetes had retinopathy. The prevalence of retinopathy was 21.9% in those with known type 2 diabetes (KDM) and 6.2% in those newly diagnosed (NDM). The prevalence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) was 2.1% in those with KDM. No cases of PDR were found in those with NDM. Untreated vision threatening retinopathy (presence of PDR or macular edema) was present in 1.2% (n = 4). Factors associated with retinopathy were duration of diabetes, HbA(1c), and systolic blood pressure. Using linear extrapolation of the prevalence of retinopathy with diabetes duration, the onset of diabetes in this population was approximately the time of diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This is one of the first national studies of diabetic retinopathy in a developed country. The prevalence of retinopathy was similar to that in other population-based studies. Vision threatening retinopathy was relatively rare; however, four untreated cases were identified. Regular screening for diabetic retinopathy and more aggressive management of modifiable risk factors could reduce the numbers of people who develop vision-threatening retinopathy.

Control of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes: a nationwide French survey

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate in France in 2001 the therapeutic management and control of diabetes and of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving specialist care.

METHODS

The study was proposed to 575 diabetologists across France. The first 8 consecutive ambulatory patients with type 2 diabetes treated by oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) and/or insulin attending for consultation with a diabetologist were eligible for inclusion in the survey. The following data were collected: demographics, diabetic and cardiovascular history, cardiovascular risk factors, blood pressure, last recorded measurements of HbA(1c) and LDL cholesterol, and details of diabetes medication and cardiovascular medication.

RESULTS

4, 930 patients (53% men) aged 62 +/- 11 years were recruited by 410 specialists in diabetes care. The mean duration of diabetes was 12 +/- 9 years. 71% of patients were treated with OADs, 18% with an OAD + insulin and 9% with insulin alone. Mean HbA(1c) was 7.6 +/- 1.6%; HbA(1c) was<=6.5% in 27% of patients, between 6.6% and 8% in 39% of patients, and > 8% in 34% of patients. Mean blood pressure was 140 +/- 16/80 +/- 9 mmHg. In the study population as a whole the target blood pressure (systolic BP<140 mmHg and diastolic BP<80 mmHg) was attained by 29% of patients. Among the 3, 085 patients (63%) treated for hypertension, this target was attained in only 23% of patients; 40% of patients treated for hypertension received one single antihypertensive treatment, 36% received 2 treatments and 24% received 3 treatments or more. Among the 1, 845 patients considered by the investigators as not having hypertension, the target blood pressure was attained by 39%. A measurement for LDL cholesterol was available in 4, 036 patients (82%). 58% of these patients had LDL cholesterol<1.3 g/l, 29% had values between 1.3 and 1.6 g/l, and 13% had values > 1.6 g/l. 52% of patients were not receiving any lipid-lowering agents, 28% were treated with statins, 19% with fibrates, and 1% with statins + fibrates. LDL cholesterol was<1.3 g/l in only 66% of the 646 patients with associated coronary heart disease.

CONCLUSION

According to this large nationwide survey, the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors remains high. Control of glycaemia, blood pressure and LDL cholesterol does not appear to be optimal. This is due in part to the severity of diabetes in these patients seen by specialists in diabetes care; however, both awareness and application of published recommendations need to be reinforced.

Epidemiological analysis of patients with Type 2 diabetes in France

This paper presents the baseline epidemiological data from 5548 patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled in a French observational study that aims to examine the safety, tolerability and use of acarbose as prescribed by general practitioners (GPs). Patients were recruited and monitored by a representative sample of GPs. Recruitment did not depend on a patient's suitability for acarbose treatment. The data revealed that the mean age of the patient population was 63 years, and that more than 50% of patients were over 65 years old. The population was markedly overweight [mean body mass index(BMI): males, 28.4 kg/m(2); females, 29.1 kg/m(2)] and the mean duration of diabetes was 10 (+/-7.3) years. Over 37% of patients had at least one diabetic complication, and the frequency of complications increased with both age and the duration of diabetes. The most frequently reported complications were cardiac (17.8%), vascular (14.5%) and ocular (12%). At recruitment, almost 90% of patients were being treated with oral antidiabetic agents (OADs). Sulphonylureas (74%) and biguanides (50%) were the most commonly prescribed agents. Acarbose was used to treat 17% of patients and 1% were receiving insulin. GPs set glycaemic treatment goals for 44% of patients in the study. Fasting glycaemia was the primary goal for 37% of the total study population, and HbA(1c) levels for 21% of patients. Postprandial glycaemia was generally given as a secondary or tertiary goal. In conclusion, this study provides the most up-to-date epidemiological data for patients with type 2 diabetes in France.