Cardiac hemodynamic effects of iodixanol, iopamidol, and ioxaglate following left coronary injections in anesthetized dogs

Comparison of Iodixanol and Iopromide in Patients With Renal Insufficiency and Congestive Heart Failure Undergoing Coronary Angiography by Hemodynamic Monitoring

We investigated the impact of contrast media (CM) with different osmolality on cardiac preload in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and congestive heart failure (CHF). Patients with CKD and CHF were equally randomized to receive either iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM) iodixanol or low-osmolar contrast media iopromide. We measured cardiac preload indexes by invasive hemodynamic monitoring before and after CM injection. Major adverse cardiac events postprocedures were recorded. Increase in extravascular lung water index was only seen in the iopromide group ( P < .001), while global end diastolic index and central venous pressure were all significantly increased from baseline in the both groups ( P < .001, respectively), and the increase in cardiac preload indexes was significantly greater in the iopromide group than in the iodixanol group ( P < 0.001). The overall incidence of acute heart failure was more frequently observed in the iopromide group ( P = 0.027). Low-osmolar contrast media iopromide significantly increased cardiac preload in patients with CKD and CHF undergoing cardiac catheterization procedures compared with IOCM iodixanol.

Optimal contrast agents for vascular imaging on computed tomography: iodixanol versus iohexol

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Dimeric nonionic iodinated contrast has a lower osmolality than monomeric nonionic iodinated contrast but is available at lower iodine concentrations. Less dilution of intravascular fluid by influx from the extravascular space is proposed to occur with decreasing osmolality. The purpose of this study was to determine if a dimeric nonionic iso-osmolar contrast agent (iodixanol) gives equal vascular enhancement compared with a monomeric nonionic hyperosmolar contrast agent (iohexol).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A dynamic single-level computed tomography (CT) scan was performed of the abdominal aorta of 12 sedated rabbits using a four-row multidetector CT scanner following injection of 1.5 mL contrast/kg body weight at 2 mL/sec. The rabbits were injected with the dimeric contrast agent iodixanol (Visipaque 320; Amersham Health) or the monomeric contrast agent iohexol (Omnipaque 350; Amersham Health). The order of the type of contrast media injected was randomized for each rabbit, and the interval between injections was 2 weeks. Using the 2.5-mm detectors, four contiguous 3-mm contrast-enhanced scans were obtained at a single level every 5 seconds for 120 seconds (total of 24 scans) with a kVp of 120, mA.s of 110, field of view of 106 mm, and soft tissue reconstruction algorithm. A single level was chosen to measure the attenuation of the abdominal aorta at 5-second intervals. The mean attenuation and standard deviation values were recorded for the whole aorta, for the central half of the vessel, and for the peripheral half of the vessel. A log-log transformation of the data was performed and regression analysis was done on the outcomes of interest (e.g., mean, standard deviation) on time for each region.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in mean attenuation for the whole aorta for iodixanol and iohexol (P = .918) even though the iodine content was 9.3% less with the dimeric iodixanol. The time-attenuation curve of iodixanol paralleled that of iohexol for all time points. The mean attenuation values of the central half of the aorta (P = .354) and peripheral half of the aorta (P = .758) were also not statistically different for the two contrast agents.

CONCLUSION

The vascular attenuation provided by a 9.3% lower iodine concentration of iso-osmolar iodixanol is equal to that given by hyperosmolar iohexol. This suggests that there is less intravascular dilution of iso-osmolar contrast. The enhancement across the cross section of the vessel is also similar for both contrast agents. This suggests the vascular studies with iodixanol and iohexol are of equal quality even when a lower dose of iodine is given with iodixanol. It is relevant for patients with borderline or diminished renal function in whom less volume of contrast may be administered.

Iosimenol, a low-viscosity nonionic dimer: preclinical physicochemistry, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Newer radiologic techniques require fast bolus injections and thus low-viscosity, high-concentration, well-tolerated contrast media (CM), especially in vulnerable patients. To this end, we designed and developed iosimenol, a novel isotonic nonionic dimer, and have conducted tests to enable its clinical evaluation.

METHODS

Standard physicochemical methods were used. Effects on erythrocyte morphology and coagulation were investigated in human and rat blood. Neural tolerance was assessed by behavioral tests in rats after intracisternal injection. Immunosensitizing potential was evaluated by the skin sensitization test in guinea pigs and by the popliteal lymph node assay in rats. Pharmacokinetics and biotransformation were investigated in rats and dogs.

RESULTS

Iosimenol is extremely hydrophilic, it is less viscous than any other isotonic CM, has little effect on erythrocytes and blood coagulation, and has good neural tolerance. No immunosensitizing effect was found in validated animal models. Pharmacokinetics are identical with other angio- and urographic CM.

CONCLUSIONS

Iosimenol is the only CM which, although isotonic, affords, unlike current nonionic dimers, at the same iodine concentration the low viscosity of monomeric, nonionic agents, which are all hypertonic. Iosimenol's pharmacologic characteristics closely resemble those of iotrolan and iodixanol.

Effects of hyperosmolar ionic and low osmolar non-ionic contrast media on acid base, blood gas and electrolyte status in dogs

The dogs in groups I, II and III in equal numbers received diatrizoate, iohexol and ioxilan at a dose of 700 mgI/kg intravenously (i.v.) as a bolus, respectively. Blood samples were collected prior to contrast media (CM) administration and thereafter at 3, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 180 min to evaluate acid-base, venous blood gas status (pH, PCO2, PO2, HCO, BE, O2) and electrolytes (Na+, Ca++, K+). Values of pH, PCO2, BE, HCO, Na+ and K+ remained unchanged or within non-significant fluctuations compared with the baseline values. PO2 was significantly different from the baseline values in group 1 up to 90 min after administration, significant alterations were found for O2 saturation in group 1 up to 90 min, and in group II at 3, 60 and 180 min; and for Ca++ in group 1 at all time points except at 90 min, and groups II and II at 3 and 15 min post administration. It was concluded that none of the CM are considered to cause long-lasting and major effects on acid-base, blood gas and electrolyte status.