Aspirin versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection (TREAT-CAD): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial

Medical and interventional outcome of dissection of the cervical arteries: Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The management of cervical artery dissections (CADs) is poorly standardized given the scarce number of prospective studies comparing medical and interventional approach to CAD. The aim of the present study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the treatments of CAD.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis (pre-registered on PROSPERO [CRD42022297512] are performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses [PRISMA] guidelines searching in three different databases [PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Database]) of studies on medical or interventional approach to CAD. Only prospective studies were selected to reduce the risk of bias for the primary meta-analysis. Secondarily, retrospective studies were also included. The aim was to assess the rate of stroke and of stroke/death/bleeding (major or intracranial) by Der Simonian-Laird weights of random effects model.

RESULTS

After screening 456 articles, 6 prospective and 22 retrospective studies were identified. Two randomized controlled trials and five retrospective studies comparing antiplatelet (APT) vs oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) for CAD were identified, as well as four prospective and 17 retrospective single-arm studies evaluating stenting for CAD. In the meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing APT vs OAC, 444 patients were considered, and a borderline significant association was identified in terms of stroke/death in the APT vs OAC groups (odds ratio [OR], 5.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-33.38; P = .06; I2 = 0%). No differences were found for the stroke/death/bleeding outcome (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.19-8.18; P = .81; I2 = 0%) between the two treatments. In the meta-analysis including also retrospective studies, overall risk of bias was considered "serious," and 4104 patients were included with no differences in APT vs OAC for stroke (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.53-2.11; P = .29; I2 = 18%); no other comparisons were possible. The pooled meta-analysis of prospective studies on stenting for CAD included four series, for a total of 68 patients, in whom stenting was adopted primarily after failed medical therapy or after traumatic dissection. The pooled rate of stroke/death was 7% (95% CI, 3%-17%; I2 = 0%). The analysis of moderators identified a significant inverse association between the percentage of traumatic dissection and a reduction in postoperative stroke (Y = -1.60-2.02X; P = .03). The pooled rate of the composite endpoint of stroke/death/ or major bleeding was 8% (95% CI, 3%-18%; I2 = 0%). Secondarily, the meta-analysis also included 17 retrospective studies with overall 457 patients and showed a 2.1% pooled rate of stroke/death (95% CI, 1.0%-3.3%; I2 = 0%) and 3.2% stroke/death/bleeding (95% CI, 1.8%-4.7%; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Few prospective studies on CAD treatment are present in literature. APT and OAC seem to have similar efficacy in reducing the recurrence of stroke after CAD. No definitive conclusion can be drawn for stenting, due to the low number of studies available. More prospective studies are necessary to evaluate its potential additional value over medical therapy alone in the early phase after CAD.

Individual participant data analysis comparing acute stroke patients with anterior versus posterior circulation dissections

BACKGROUND

Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is a relevant etiology of transient ischemic attacks and strokes. Several trials explored the significance of specific antithrombotic treatments, i.e. oral anticoagulation (OAC) versus antiplatelet treatment (APT), on recurrent ischemic complications and clinical outcomes. As overall incidence rates of complications were low there is still controversy which antithrombotic treatment should be used. However, up to now there has been no systematic investigation among CAD-patients with ischemic stroke specifically comparing clinical course and outcome of patients with anterior versus posterior CAD.

METHODS

We performed an individual participant data analysis of patients with CAD and ischemic stroke. Over a five-year period we pooled data from three sites (i.e. West China Hospital, Chengdu, China as well as Erlangen and Giessen University Hospitals, Germany) and enrolled patients with CAD-associated ischemic stroke. Patient demographics, clinical and in-hospital measures as well as radiological data were retrieved from institutional databases. Clinical follow-up was over 6 months and included data on recurrent ischemic strokes and hemorrhages as well as clinical functional outcome assessed by the modified Rankin Scale dichotomized into favourable (mRS=0-2) and unfavourable.

RESULTS

A total of 203 patients with CAD were included of which n=112 had anterior and n=91 had posterior CAD. Patients with posterior CAD were younger (46.0 vs. 41.0 y; p<0.001) than patients with anterior CAD and showed less often arterial hypertension. (42.0 % vs. 28.6 %; p<0.048). Antithrombotic treatment with APT and OAC was similarily distributed among patients with anterior and posterior CAD and not significantly differently related to ischemic or hemorrhagic complications during follow-up (all p=n.s.). Main difference between Chinese and German patients were mode of antithrombotic treatment consisting predominantly of APT in China compared to OAC in Germany. Functional outcome overall was good, yet worse in patients with anterior CAD compared to posterior CAD (80.2 % favorable in anterior CAD vs. 92.2 % in posterior CAD (p=0.014).

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that anterior and posterior CAD show baseline imbalances regarding age and comorbidity which may affect clinical outcome. There are no signals of superiority or harm of any specific mode of antithrombotic treatment nor relevant discrepancies in clinical outcome among Chinese and German CAD-associated stroke patients.

Surgical treatment of one traumatic carotid artery dissection: A case report and review of the literature

RATIONALE

Dissection of the cervical arteries is the most commonly identified cause of stroke in young patients. This report helps to investigate the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of cervical artery dissection (CAD).

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 40-year-old female presented with a 3-week history of right carotid artery dissection due to a fall. The patient was admitted to the local hospital 3 weeks ago with a right neck impingement after a fall, and presented with right neck pain. The local hospital CT scan showed a dissection of the middle segment of the right common carotid artery.

DIAGNOSES

The patient clinical manifestations and imaging tests confirmed that right carotid artery dissection.

INTERVENTIONS

Medical treatment with antiplatelet failed, and the CT scan showed progression of dissection. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was performed, and the prognosis is good.

OUTCOMES

This patient was followed up at 1 and 6 months after the operation, CT scan showed the original stenotic vessels returned to standard diameter.

LESSONS

Diagnosis of CAD mainly depends on clinical manifestations and imaging. we recommend that clinicians can prescribe either anticoagulants or antiplatelet therapy. CAD can be effectively treated by surgical reconstruction, if medical treatment with anticoagulation or antiplatelet fails or if carotid aneurysms and/or high-grade carotid stenosis persisted or have newly developed.

Association between cervicocerebral artery dissection and tortuosity - a review on quantitative and qualitative assessment

Cervicocerebral artery dissection stands out as a significant contributor to ischemic stroke in young adults. Several studies have shown that arterial tortuosity is associated with dissection. We searched Pubmed and Embase to identify studies on the association between arterial tortuosity and cervicocerebral artery dissection, and to perform a review on the epidemiology of cervicocerebral artery tortuosity and dissection, pathophysiology, measurement of vessels tortuosity, strength of association between tortuosity and dissection, clinical manifestation and management strategies. The prevalence of tortuosity in dissected cervical arteries was reported to be around 22%-65% while it is only around 8%-22% in non-dissected arteries. In tortuous cervical arteries elastin and tunica media degradation, increased wall stiffness, changes in hemodynamics as well as arterial wall inflammation might be associated with dissection. Arterial tortuosity index and vertebrobasilar artery deviation is used to measure the level of vessel tortuosity. Studies have shown an independent association between these two measurements and cervicocerebral artery dissection. Different anatomical variants of tortuosity such as loops, coils and kinks may have a different level of association with cervicocerebral artery dissection. Symptomatic patients with extracranial cervical artery dissection are often treated with anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents, while patients with intracranial arterial dissection were often treated with antiplatelets only due to concerns of developing subarachnoid hemorrhage. Patients with recurrent ischemia, compromised cerebral blood flow or contraindications for antithrombotic agents are usually treated with open surgery or endovascular technique. Those with subarachnoid hemorrhage and intracranial artery dissection are often managed with surgical intervention due to high risk of re-hemorrhage.

Antithrombotic Treatment for Cervical Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Importance

Cervical artery dissection is the most common cause of stroke in younger adults. To date, there is no conclusive evidence on which antithrombotic therapy should be used to treat patients.

Objective

To perform an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing anticoagulants and antiplatelets in prevention of stroke after cervical artery dissection.

Data Sources

PubMed.gov, Cochrane database, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to August 1, 2023.

Study Selection

Randomized clinical trials that investigated the effectiveness and safety of antithrombotic treatment (antiplatelets vs anticoagulation) in patients with cervical artery dissection were included in the meta-analysis. The primary end point was required to include a composite of (1) any stroke, (2) death, or (3) major bleeding (extracranial or intracranial) at 90 days of follow-up.

Data Extraction/Synthesis

Two independent investigators performed a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and inconsistencies were resolved by a principal investigator.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a composite of (1) ischemic stroke, (2) death, or (3) major bleeding (extracranial or intracranial) at 90 days of follow-up. The components of the composite outcome were also secondary outcomes. Subgroup analyses based on baseline characteristics with a putative association with the outcome were performed. Logistic regression was performed using the maximum penalized likelihood method including interaction in the subgroup analyses.

Results

Two randomized clinical trials, Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study and Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study and the Biomarkers and Antithrombotic Treatment in Cervical Artery Dissection, were identified, of which all participants were eligible. A total of 444 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population and 370 patients were included in the per-protocol population. Baseline characteristics were balanced. There were fewer primary end points in those randomized to anticoagulation vs antiplatelet therapy (3 of 218 [1.4%] vs 10 of 226 [4.4%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.33 [95% CI, 0.08-1.05]; P = .06), but the finding was not statistically significant. In comparison with aspirin, anticoagulation was associated with fewer strokes (1 of 218 [0.5%] vs 10 of 226 [4.0%]; OR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.02-0.61]; P = .01) and more bleeding events (2 vs 0).

Conclusions and Relevance

This individual patient data meta-analysis of 2 currently available randomized clinical trial data found no significant difference between anticoagulants and antiplatelets in preventing early recurrent events.

Classification and management strategy of spontaneous carotid artery dissection

OBJECTIVE

Spontaneous carotid artery dissections (sCADs) are the common cause of stroke in middle-aged and young people. There is still a lack of clinical classification to guide the management of sCAD. We reviewed our experience with 179 patients with sCAD and proposed a new classification for sCAD with prognostic and therapeutic significance.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from June 2018 to June 2023 of patients with sCAD treated at a large tertiary academic institution in an urban city in China. Based on imaging results, we categorize sCAD into four types: type Ⅰ, intramural hematoma or dissection with <70% luminal narrowing; type Ⅱ, intramural hematoma or dissection with ≥70% luminal narrowing; type Ⅲ, dissecting aneurysm; type ⅣA, extracranial carotid artery occlusion; and type ⅣB, tandem occlusion. We compared the clinical data and prognostic outcomes among various types of sCADs.

RESULTS

A total of 179 patients and 197 dissected arteries met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the 179 patients with sCAD was 49.5 years, 78% were male, and 18 patients (10%) had bilateral sCAD. According to our classification, there were 56 type Ⅰ (28.4%), 50 type Ⅱ (25.4%), 60 type Ⅲ (30.5%), and 31 type Ⅳ (15.7%) dissections. During a mean hospitalization length of 11.4 ± 47.0 days, there were nine recurrent strokes (4.6%) after medical treatment, two type Ⅲ dissections (1.0%), seven type Ⅳ dissections (3.6%), all ipsilateral, and one death. Overall, there were seven (3.6%, 1 type Ⅰ dissection, 3 type Ⅱ dissections, 2 type Ⅲ dissections, and 1 type Ⅳ dissection) recurrent strokes and three (1.5%, all type Ⅲ dissections) recurrent transient ischemic attacks in patients treated with just medical therapy during the follow-up period, all ipsilateral, with a mean follow-up of 26 months (range, 3-59 months). These patients did not undergo further intervention due to the high difficulty associated with endovascular treatment (EVT) or the mild nature of recurrent cerebral ischemic symptoms. Twenty-nine type I dissections (51.8%) were completely recanalized after antithrombotic therapy. A total of 19 type II dissections (38%) and 44 type III dissections (73%) received EVT for persistent flow-limited dissections, enlargement of dissecting aneurysms, or aggravation of neurological symptoms despite antithrombotic therapy. Type Ⅳ dissections are more likely to lead to the occurrence of ischemic stroke and presented with more severe symptoms. Eight type IVB dissections (33%) received acute phase intervention due to distal thromboembolism or aggravation of neurological symptoms after medical treatment. In terms of cerebral ischemic events and mortality, there were no statistically significant differences among the four types of sCAD (all P > .05). Favorable outcome was achieved in 168 patients (93.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study proposed a novel and more comprehensive classification method and the modern management strategy for sCAD. Antithrombotic therapy is beneficial to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke for stable sCAD. Non-emergent EVT can be an alternative therapeutic approach for patients who meet indications as in type II to IVA dissections. Urgent procedure with neurovascular intervention is necessary for some type IVB dissections. The short-term results of EVT for sCAD are encouraging, and long-term device-related and functional outcomes should undergo further research.

Behavior of Extracranial-to-Intracranial Extended Arterial Dissections of the Vertebral Artery

BACKGROUND

Vertebral artery dissections (VADs) may extend from the extracranial to the intracranial vasculature (e+iVAD). We evaluated how the characteristics of e+iVAD differed from those of intracranial VAD (iVAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 2002 to 2019, among consecutive patients with cervicocephalic dissection, those with iVAD and e+iVAD were included, and their clinical characteristics were compared. In patients with unruptured dissections, a composite clinical outcome of subsequent ischemic events, subsequent hemorrhagic stroke, or mortality was evaluated. High-resolution magnetic resonance images were analyzed to evaluate intracranial remodeling index. Among 347 patients, 51 (14.7%) had e+iVAD and 296 (85.3%) had iVAD. The hemorrhagic presentation occurred solely in iVAD (0.0% versus 19.3%), whereas e+iVAD exhibited higher ischemic presentation (84.3% versus 27.4%; P<0.001). e+iVAD predominantly presented steno-occlusive morphology (88.2% versus 27.7%) compared with dilatation patterns (11.8% versus 72.3%; P<0.001) of iVAD. The ischemic presentation was significantly associated with e+iVAD (iVAD as a reference; adjusted odds ratio, 3.97 [95% CI, 1.67-9.45]; P=0.002]). Patients with unruptured VAD showed no differences in the rate of composite clinical outcome between the groups (log-rank, P=0.996). e+iVAD had a lower intracranial remodeling index (1.4±0.3 versus 1.6±0.4; P<0.032) and a shorter distance from dural entry to the maximal dissecting segment (6.9±8.4 versus 15.7±7.4; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

e+iVAD is associated with lower rates of hemorrhages and higher rates of ischemia than iVAD at the time of admission. This may be explained by a lower intracranial remodeling index and less deep intrusion of the dissecting segment into the intracranial space.

Sex-based difference in selected stroke etiologies: cerebral dural sinus venous thrombosis, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, dissection, migraine, pregnancy/puerperium/OC use

Females are at higher risk than males for a multitude of cerebrovascular conditions, both common and rare; partially resulting from a complex interplay between differing process involving genetics, hormonal influences, common cerebrovascular risk factors among others. Specific topics including cervical artery dissection, cerebral dural sinus venous thrombosis, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, migraine, along with these disorders in the setting of pregnancy, puerperium and oral contraceptive utilization. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, basics of management and outcomes are presented, with sex differences throughout.

Intrinsic stenosing and occlusive pathologies of the vertebral artery: A narrative review

Intrinsic pathologies of the vertebral arteries, such as atherosclerosis, dissection, fibromuscular dysplasia, radionecrosis and vasculitis, are important causes of vertebrobasilar insufficiency and cerebrovascular events. This review focuses on non-aneurysmal intrinsic stenosing and occlusive pathologies, covering their epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment options. It also provides a detailed summary of key clinical presentations and syndromes, including an in-depth examination of lateral medullary syndrome, historically known as Wallenberg's syndrome, which is arguably the most emblematic condition resulting from vertebral artery involvement and is depicted in an illustrative cartoon.

Toward Individual Treatment in Cervical Artery Dissection: Subgroup Analysis of the TREAT-CAD Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVE

Uncertainty remains regarding antithrombotic treatment in cervical artery dissection. This analysis aimed to explore whether certain patient profiles influence the effects of different types of antithrombotic treatment.

METHODS

This was a post hoc exploratory analysis based on the per-protocol dataset from TREAT-CAD (NCT02046460), a randomized controlled trial comparing aspirin to anticoagulation in patients with cervical artery dissection. We explored the potential effects of distinct patient profiles on outcomes in participants treated with either aspirin or anticoagulation. Profiles included (1) presenting with ischemia (no/yes), (2) occlusion of the dissected artery (no/yes), (3) early versus delayed treatment start (median), and (4) intracranial extension of the dissection (no/yes). Outcomes included clinical (stroke, major hemorrhage, death) and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes (new ischemic or hemorrhagic brain lesions) and were assessed for each subgroup in separate logistic models without adjustment for multiple testing.

RESULTS

All 173 (100%) per-protocol participants were eligible for the analyses. Participants without occlusion had decreased odds of events when treated with anticoagulation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.07-0.86). This effect was more pronounced in participants presenting with cerebral ischemia (n = 118; OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.04-0.55). In the latter, those with early treatment (OR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.07-0.85) or without intracranial extension of the dissection (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.11-0.97) had decreased odds of events when treated with anticoagulation.

INTERPRETATION

Anticoagulation might be preferable in patients with cervical artery dissection presenting with ischemia and no occlusion or no intracranial extension of the dissection. These findings need confirmation. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:886-897.

Best Evidence Topic report: Antithrombotic therapy and endovascular intervention for blunt cerebrovascular injury

A short cut review of the literature was carried out to examine the evidence supporting antithrombotic treatment and/or endovascular therapy to reduce mortality and/or prevent future stroke following blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI). Five papers were identified as suitable for inclusion using the reported search strategy. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of the best papers are tabulated. It is concluded that in patients with BCVI confirmed by CT angiography, there is limited evidence to support screening for, or treating BCVI. In confirmed BCVI where the risk of stroke is felt to outweigh the risk of bleeding, antiplatelet therapy appears to be as effective as therapeutic anticoagulation.

Cervical radiculopathy secondary to vertebral artery dissection: clinical features and outcomes

PURPOSE

Cervical radiculopathy due to various mechanical causes is commonly seen, however, cervical vertebral artery dissection (cVAD)-related radiculopathy is very rare with poorly characterized clinical outcomes. Thus, we conducted a systematic review of published literature and reported an institutional case to provide a better illustration of this rare entity.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the PubMed literature and queried the clinical database at our center for cVAD-related radiculopathy. We described the baseline characteristics of patients with cVAD-related radiculopathy, the involved segment, diagnostic approach and treatment options.

RESULT

14 previously published studies met the inclusion criteria and along with the case we identified in our center, our study included 17 patients total (median age: 35 years, 9 females). C5 was the most commonly affected root and ipsilateral shoulder/arm pain along with shoulder abduction weakness was most common presentation. Antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy was the treatment of choice. Most cases managed conservatively (82%). Majority of the cases (92%) had either complete or partial resolution of their symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Despite its limitations, this study show that cVAD related radiculopathy is a relatively benign entity with excellent clinical outcomes when managed medically.

Treatment and Outcomes of Cervical Artery Dissection in Adults: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Cervical artery dissection is an important cause of stroke, particularly in young adults. Data conflict on the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected cervical artery dissection, leading to variability in practice. We aim to provide an overview of cervical artery dissection in the setting of minor or no reported mechanical trigger with a focus on summarizing the available evidence and providing suggestions on the diagnostic evaluation, treatment approaches, and outcomes. Writing group members drafted their sections using a literature search focused on publications between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2022, and included randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies, meta-analyses, opinion papers, case series, and case reports. The writing group chair and vice chair compiled the manuscript and obtained writing group members' approval. Cervical artery dissection occurs as a result of the interplay among risk factors, minor trauma, anatomic and congenital abnormalities, and genetic predisposition. The diagnosis can be challenging both clinically and radiologically. In patients with acute ischemic stroke attributable to cervical artery dissection, acute treatment strategies such as thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy are reasonable in otherwise eligible patients. We suggest that the antithrombotic therapy choice be individualized and continued for at least 3 to 6 months. The risk of recurrent dissection is low, and preventive measures may be considered early after the diagnosis and continued in high-risk patients. Ongoing longitudinal and population-based observational studies are needed to close the present gaps on preferred antithrombotic regimens considering clinical and radiographic prognosticators of cervical artery dissection.

Epidemiology of Spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissection: Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) represents up to 15% to 25% of ischemic strokes in people under the age of 50 years. Noninvasive vessel imaging is increasingly used in clinical practice, but the impact on the frequency of detection of CeAD is unknown. In 2006, the yearly incidence rate of CeAD was estimated at 2.6 per 100 000 person-years, but the current incidence is unknown.

METHODS

In this population-based retrospective observational cohort study, we utilized the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project to ascertain all adult residents of Olmsted County, MN, diagnosed with internal carotid artery dissection and common carotid artery dissection or vertebral artery dissection from 2002 to 2020. Patients with only intracranial involvement or CeAD following major trauma were excluded. Age-adjusted sex-specific and age- and sex-adjusted incidence rates were estimated using the US White 2010 decennial census, with rates expressed per 100 000 person-years. We assessed longitudinal trends by dividing the data into 5-year time intervals, with the last being a 4-year interval.

RESULTS

We identified 123 patients with a diagnosis of CeAD. There were 63 patients with internal carotid artery dissection, 54 with vertebral artery dissection, 2 with concurrent internal carotid artery dissection and vertebral artery dissection, and 4 with common carotid artery dissection. There were 63 (51.2%) female patients and 60 (48.8%) male patients. The average age at diagnosis was 50.2 years (SD, 15.1 [95% CI, 20.1-90.5] years). The incidence rate of spontaneous CeAD encompassing all locations was 4.69 per 100 000 person-years (2.43 for internal carotid artery dissection and 2.01 for vertebral artery dissection). The incidence rate increased from 2.30 per 100 000 person-years from 2002 to 2006 to 8.93 per 100 000 person-years from 2017 to 2020 (P<0.0001). The incidence rate for female patients rose from 0.81 per 100 000 person-years from 2002 to 2006 to 10.17 per 100 000 person-years from 2017 to 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence rate of spontaneous CeAD increased nearly 4-fold over a 19-year period from 2002 to 2020. The incidence rate in women rose over 12-fold. The increase in incidence rates likely reflects the increased use of noninvasive vascular imaging.

Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Stroke Due to a Severe Right Vertebral Artery Stenosis With a Left Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Dissection: What's Next?

Guidelines for the treatment and management of ischemic strokes triggered by stenosis versus dissection are well established. However, the presence of both entities in the same patient, although rare, poses challenges for short- and long-term treatment. Here, we describe the case of a 55-year-old man who presented to the emergency department with a 72-hour history of headache, dizziness, unbalanced gait, nausea, and two episodes of vomiting. Stroke was initially suspected, but the computerized tomography (CT) scan showed no hemorrhage. His magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed right inferior cerebellar acute ischemia in the territory of the right posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA), with smaller foci of early acute infarcts in the bilateral inferior cerebellum. Furthermore, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and CT angiography revealed right vertebral artery stenosis and left cervical internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD). This clinical report describes a rare case of stroke secondary to vertebral artery stenosis with concomitant carotid artery dissection. The treatment course and evolution are presented.

High risk and low prevalence diseases: Spontaneous cervical artery dissection

INTRODUCTION

Spontaneous cervical artery dissection (sCAD) is a serious condition that carries with it a high rate of morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

This review highlights the pearls and pitfalls of sCAD, including presentation, diagnosis, and management in the emergency department (ED) based on current evidence.

DISCUSSION

sCAD is a condition affecting the carotid or vertebral arteries and occurs as a result of injury and compromise to the arterial wall layers. The dissection most commonly affects the extracranial vessels but may extend intracranially, resulting in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Patients typically present with symptoms due to compression of local structures, and the presentation depends on the vessel affected. The most common symptom is headache and/or neck pain. Signs and symptoms of ischemia may occur, including transient ischemic attack and stroke. There are a variety of risk factors for sCAD, including underlying connective tissue or vascular disorders, and there may be an inciting event involving minimal trauma to the head or neck. Diagnosis includes imaging, most commonly computed tomography angiography of the head and neck. Ultrasound can diagnose sCAD but should not be used to exclude the condition. Treatment includes specialist consultation (neurology and vascular specialist), consideration of thrombolysis in appropriate patients, symptomatic management, and administration of antithrombotic medications.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of sCAD can assist emergency clinicians in diagnosing and managing this potentially deadly disease.

[Secondary prophylaxis of ischemic stroke]

The secondary prophylaxis of ischemic stroke provides an enormous therapeutic potential due to the high frequency of recurrent thrombembolic events and the exceptional importance of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors for the individual risk of stroke. In this respect, anti-thrombotic, interventional and surgical treatment options must be selected based on the respective etiology. Furthermore, meticulous optimization of risk factors is essential for effective long-term care. Close interdisciplinary and intersectoral collaboration is crucial, especially in the long-term treatment.

Acute management of childhood stroke

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this paper is to review recent updates in the acute management of childhood arterial ischemic stroke, including reperfusion therapies and neuroprotective measures.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the emergence of pediatric stroke centers in recent years, processes facilitating rapid diagnosis and treatment have resulted in improved implementation of early targeted neuroprotective measures as well as the increased use of reperfusion therapies in childhood arterial ischemic stroke. Retrospective data has demonstrated that alteplase is safe in carefully selected children with arterial ischemic stroke in the first 4.5 h from symptom onset, though data regarding its efficacy in children are still lacking. There is also increasing data that suggests that thrombectomy in children with large vessel occlusion improves functional outcomes. Recent adult studies, including the use of Tenecteplase as an alteplase alternative and expansion of late thrombectomy to include patients with large ischemic cores, also are reviewed along with limitations to application of the adult data to pediatric care.

SUMMARY

There have been significant advances in the hyperacute care of children with ischemic stroke and early diagnosis and targeted management are of the upmost importance in improving long-term outcomes.

Imaging of Vertebral Artery Dissection in Children: An Underrecognized Condition with High Risk of Recurrent Stroke

Vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is a common cause of a rare condition, pediatric posterior circulation arterial ischemic stroke (PCAIS). VAD is clinically important due to the risk of multifocal and continuing infarcts from artery-to-artery thromboembolism, with the potential for occlusion of arteries that perfuse the brainstem. Early diagnosis is important, as recurrent stroke is a common effect of VAD in children. Although the relative efficacies of different treatment regimens for VAD in children remain unsettled, early initiation of treatment can mitigate the risk of delayed stroke. Clinical diagnosis of PCAIS may be delayed due to multiple factors, including nonspecific symptoms and the inability of younger patients to express symptoms. In fact, subacute or chronic infarcts are often present at initial imaging. Although the most common cause of isolated PCAIS is VAD, imaging of the cervical arteries has been historically underused in this setting. Cervical vascular imaging (MR angiography, CT angiography, and digital subtraction angiography) for VAD must be optimized to detect the sometimes subtle findings, which may be identified at initial or follow-up imaging. Osseous variants of the craniocervical junction and upper cervical spine and other extrinsic lesions that may directly injure the vertebral arteries or lead to altered biomechanics have been implicated in some cases. The authors review characteristic imaging features and optimized imaging of VAD and associated PCAIS and related clinical considerations. Identification of VAD has important implications for evaluation, treatment, and imaging follow-up, as this condition may result in progressive arteriopathy and recurrent stroke. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Eagle syndrome: An updated review

Background

This work aims to review the current literature and our experience on vascular Eagle syndrome (ES) that can present misleading clinical presentations and better understand the possible therapeutic strategies.

Methods

We reviewed the existing literature on PubMed from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022, including the sequential keywords "vascular AND Eagle syndrome," "vascular AND styloid syndrome," "vascular AND elongated styloid process," "vascular AND stylocarotid syndrome," and "Eagle syndrome AND carotid artery dissection."

Results

38 vascular ES cases, including our experience, were analyzed. The most frequent clinical onset was hemiparesis (n 21, 57%), but other regular clinical presentations were aphasia, loss of consciousness, amaurosis, headache, or a combination of the latter. Massive oral bleeding was reported only once in the literature before our case. Twelve patients were treated with only antiplatelet therapy, either single or double. Nine patients were treated with anticoagulation therapy only. In 14 patients, a carotid artery stent was used, associated with anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy. In 17 cases, a styloid process (SP) resection was performed.

Conclusion

ES has many clinical presentations, and carotid artery dissection resulting in oral bleeding seems rare. Literature results and our experience make us believe that when dealing with vascular ES, the best treatment strategy is endovascular internal carotid artery stenting with antiplatelet therapy, followed by surgical removal of the elongated SP to prevent stent fracture.

Small vessel disease is associated with later onset of major adverse cardiovascular events after acute cervicocerebral artery dissection

BACKGROUND

Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is common among the elderly and has been associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and increased risk of long-term disability. Little is known whether CSVD affects outcomes after cervicocerebral artery dissection (CAD), which predominantly affects younger patients. Specifically, there is a paucity as to whether CSVD increases the risk of MACE after CAD and whether this risk is different for early versus late events.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 140 consecutive patients with acute CAD. We determined CSVD on MRI using the STRIVE criteria and calculated the CSVD sum score based on the individual CSVD components. For statistical analysis the CSVD burden was dichotomized to mild (score 0-1) versus severe (score 2-4). The primary outcome of interest was the 6-month MACE risk. Secondary outcomes of interest were early versus late MACE, stroke at presentation, and good 90-day outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2).

RESULTS

There was no difference in overall MACE between subjects when stratified by CSVD burden (10.1% versus 9.8%, Log-rank P = 0.953). We found that patients with severe CSVD had significantly more late MACE as compared to mild CSVD (9.8% versus 1.1%, P = 0.024). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of stroke at the time of CAD diagnosis (50.6% versus 47.1%, P = 0.690) and the 90-day disability-free survival in subjects with mild versus severe CSVD (93.7% versus 91.7%, P = 0.729).

CONCLUSION

Severe CSVD burden was associated with a significantly greater risk of late MACE. CSVD assessment in CAD patients may aid risk stratification and treatment optimization.

Genetic Insights on the Relation of Vascular Risk Factors and Cervical Artery Dissection

BACKGROUND

The association between vascular risk factors and cervical artery dissections (CeADs), a leading cause of ischemic stroke (IS) in the young, remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the causal relation of vascular risk factors with CeAD risk and recurrence and compare it to their relation with non-CeAD IS.

METHODS

This study used 2-sample Mendelian randomization analyses to explore the association of blood pressure (BP), lipid levels, type 2 diabetes, waist-to-hip ratio, smoking, and body mass index with CeAD and non-CeAD IS. To simulate effects of the most frequently used BP-lowering drugs, this study constructed genetic proxies and tested their association with CeAD and non-CeAD IS. In analyses among patients with CeAD, the investigators studied the association between weighted genetic risk scores of vascular risk factors and the risk of multiple or early recurrent dissections.

RESULTS

Genetically determined higher systolic BP (OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.32-1.72) and diastolic BP (OR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.92-3.00) increased the risk of CeAD (P < 0.0001). Genetically determined higher body mass index was inconsistently associated with a lower risk of CeAD. Genetic proxies for β-blocker effects were associated with a lower risk of CeAD (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.50-0.85), whereas calcium-channel blockers were associated with a lower risk of non-CeAD IS (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.63-0.90). Weighted genetic risk scores for systolic BP and diastolic BP were associated with an increased risk of multiple or early recurrent CeAD.

CONCLUSIONS

These results are supportive of a causal association between higher BP and increased CeAD risk and recurrence and provide genetic evidence for lower CeAD risk under β-blockers. This may inform secondary prevention strategies and trial design for CeAD.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Aortic Arch Emergencies: Takayasu Disease, Fibromuscular Dysplasia, and Aortic Arch Pathologies: A Retrospective Study and Review of the Literature

Non-atherosclerotic aortic arch pathologies (NA-AAPs) and anatomical variants are characterized as rare cardiovascular diseases with a low incidence rate, below 1 case per 2000 population, but enormous heterogeneity in terms of anatomical variants, i.e., Takayasu disease (TAK) and fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD). In specific clinical scenarios, NA-AAPs constitute life-threatening disorders.

METHODS

In this study, 82 (1.07%) consecutive patients with NA-AAPs (including 38 TAKs, 26 FMDs, and 18 other AAPs) out of 7645 patients who underwent endovascular treatment (EVT) for the aortic arch and its side-branch diseases at a single institution between 2002 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The recorded demographic, biochemical, diagnostic, operative, and postoperative factors were reviewed, and the functional outcomes were determined during follow-up. A systematic review of the literature was also performed.

RESULTS

The study group comprised 65 (79.3%) female and 17 (21.7%) male subjects with a mean age of 46.1 ± 14.9 years. Overall, 62 (75.6%) patients were diagnosed with either cerebral ischemia symptoms or aortic arch dissection on admission. The EVT was feasible in 59 (72%) patients, whereas 23 (28%) patients were referred for medical treatment. In EVT patients, severe periprocedural complications occurred in two (3.39%) patients, including one periprocedural death and one cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. During a median follow-up period of 64 months, cardiovascular events occurred in 24 (29.6%) patients (5 deaths, 13 ISs, and 6 myocardial infarctions). Repeated EVT for the index lesion was performed in 21/59 (35.6%) patients, including 19/33 (57.6%) in TAK and 2/13 (15.4%) in FMD. In the AAP group, one patient required additional stent-graft implantation for progressing dissection to the iliac arteries at 12 months. A baseline white blood count (odds ratio [HR]: 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.39; p < 0.001) was the only independent prognostic factor for recurrent stenosis, while a baseline hemoglobin level (HR: 0.73, 95%CI: 0.59-0.89; p = 0.002) and coronary involvement (HR: 4.11, 95%CI: 1.74-9.71; p = 0.001) were independently associated with a risk of major cardiac and cerebral events according to the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that AAPs should not be neglected in clinical settings, as it can be a life-threatening condition requiring a multidisciplinary approach. The knowledge of prognostic risk factors for adverse outcomes may improve surveillance in this group of patients.

Long-term outcome of cervical artery dissection

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to evaluate the natural history of extracranial cervical artery dissection (CAD) including comorbidities, symptoms at presentation, recurrence of symptoms, and long-term outcome following different treatment approaches.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients treated for acute CAD was performed over a 5-year period from January 2017 to April 2022.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were included in the study, 25 (64.1%) with acute internal carotid artery dissection and 14 (35.9%) with acute vertebral artery dissection. Thirty-four patients (87.1%) had spontaneous CAD, and five patients (12.8%) had traumatic CAD. The mean age of the cohort was 54.2 years. The mean time from symptom onset to presentation was 4.34 days. The most common symptoms in internal carotid artery dissection were unilateral weakness (44%), headache (44%), slurred speech (36%), facial droop (28%), unilateral paraesthesia (24%), neck pain (12%), visual disturbance (8%), and Horner's syndrome (8%). The most common symptoms in vertebral artery dissection were headache (35.7%), neck pain (35.7%), vertigo (28.57%), ataxia (14.28%), and slurred speech (14.28%). The imaging modalities used for diagnosis included computed tomography angiography (48.7%), magnetic resonance angiography (41%), and duplex ultrasound (10.2%). In patients with carotid artery dissection, 57% had severe stenosis, 24% had moderate stenosis, and 20% had mild stenosis. All patients treated were managed conservatively with either anticoagulation or antiplatelets. Long-term clinical follow-up was available for 33 patients (84.6%). Thirty patients (90.9%) reported complete resolution of symptoms, and three patients (9%) reported persistent symptoms. Anatomic follow-up with imaging was available for 17 patients (43.58%). Thirteen patients (76.47%) had complete resolution of dissection, two patients (11.76%) had partial resolution of dissection, and two patients (11.76%) had persistent dissection. There was one death unrelated to CAD in a multi-trauma patient. There were four early recurrent symptoms in the first 3 to 8 weeks post discharge. The mean follow-up time was 308.27 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of CADs can be managed conservatively with good clinical and anatomical outcome and low rates of recurrence.

Recurrence of intracranial artery dissection more than a half year after the initial event

INTRODUCTION

The management of intracranial artery dissection (IAD) has not been established, partly because the long-term course of the disease is not well-known. We retrospectively investigated the long-term course of IAD without subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) as an initial clinical presentation.

METHODS

Of 147 consecutive spontaneous first-ever IAD patients hospitalized between March 2011 and July 2018, 44 with SAH were excluded, and the remaining 103 were investigated. We divided the patients into two groups: Recurrence group as those with recurrent intracranial dissection >1 month after the initial dissection, and Non-recurrence group as those without them. Clinical characteristics were compared between those two groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 33 months from the initial event. Recurrent dissection occurred in 4 patients (3.9%) >7 months after the initial dissection, none of whom were on antithrombotic treatments at recurrence. Three had ischemic stroke and the other had local symptoms [range: 8 to 44 months]. Nine (8.7%) had an ischemic stroke within 1 month of the initial event. There was no recurrent dissection between 1 and 7 months after the initial event. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between Recurrence and Non-recurrence groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Four out of the 103 (3.9%) IAD patients had recurrent IAD >7 months after the initial event. IAD patients should be followed up for more than a half year after the initial event, with consideration given to the recurrence of IAD. Further research is needed on recurrence prevention measures to IAD patients.

Advances in Management of the Stroke Etiology One-Percenters

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Uncommon causes of stroke merit specific attention; when clinicians have less common etiologies of stoke in mind, the diagnosis may come more easily. This is key, as optimal management will in many cases differs significantly from "standard" care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) on the best medical therapy in the treatment of cervical artery dissection (CeAD) have demonstrated low rates of ischemia with both antiplatelet and vitamin K antagonism. RCT evidence supports the use of anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonism in "high-risk" patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APLAS), and there is new evidence supporting the utilization of direct oral anticoagulation in malignancy-associated thrombosis. Migraine with aura has been more conclusively linked not only with increased risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, but also with cardiovascular mortality. Recent literature has surprisingly not provided support the utilization of L-arginine in the treatment of patients with mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (MELAS); however, there is evidence at this time that support use of enzyme replacement in patients with Fabry disease. Additional triggers for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) have been identified, such as capsaicin. Imaging of cerebral blood vessel walls utilizing contrast-enhanced MRA is an emerging modality that may ultimately prove to be very useful in the evaluation of patients with uncommon causes of stroke. A plethora of associations between cerebrovascular disease and COVID-19 have been described. Where pertinent, authors provide additional tips and guidance. Less commonly encountered conditions with updates in diagnosis, and management along with clinical tips are reviewed.

Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department 3 (GRACE-3): Acute dizziness and vertigo in the emergency department

This third Guideline for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department (GRACE-3) from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine is on the topic adult patients with acute dizziness and vertigo in the emergency department (ED). A multidisciplinary guideline panel applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations regarding five questions for adult ED patients with acute dizziness of less than 2 weeks' duration. The intended population is adults presenting to the ED with acute dizziness or vertigo. The panel derived 15 evidence-based recommendations based on the timing and triggers of the dizziness but recognizes that alternative diagnostic approaches exist, such as the STANDING protocol and nystagmus examination in combination with gait unsteadiness or the presence of vascular risk factors. As an overarching recommendation, (1) emergency clinicians should receive training in bedside physical examination techniques for patients with the acute vestibular syndrome (AVS; HINTS) and the diagnostic and therapeutic maneuvers for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV; Dix-Hallpike test and Epley maneuver). To help distinguish central from peripheral causes in patients with the AVS, we recommend: (2) use HINTS (for clinicians trained in its use) in patients with nystagmus, (3) use finger rub to further aid in excluding stroke in patients with nystagmus, (4) use severity of gait unsteadiness in patients without nystagmus, (5) do not use brain computed tomography (CT), (6) do not use routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a first-line test if a clinician trained in HINTS is available, and (7) use MRI as a confirmatory test in patients with central or equivocal HINTS examinations. In patients with the spontaneous episodic vestibular syndrome: (8) search for symptoms or signs of cerebral ischemia, (9) do not use CT, and (10) use CT angiography or MRI angiography if there is concern for transient ischemic attack. In patients with the triggered (positional) episodic vestibular syndrome, (11) use the Dix-Hallpike test to diagnose posterior canal BPPV (pc-BPPV), (12) do not use CT, and (13) do not use MRI routinely, unless atypical clinical features are present. In patients diagnosed with vestibular neuritis, (14) consider short-term steroids as a treatment option. In patients diagnosed with pc-BPPV, (15) treat with the Epley maneuver. It is clear that as of 2023, when applied in routine practice by emergency clinicians without special training, HINTS testing is inaccurate, partly due to use in the wrong patients and partly due to issues with its interpretation. Most emergency physicians have not received training in use of HINTS. As such, it is not standard of care, either in the legal sense of that term ("what the average physician would do in similar circumstances") or in the common parlance sense ("the standard action typically used by physicians in routine practice").

Cervical Artery Dissection

OBJECTIVE

Cervical artery dissection is a common cause of stroke in young adults. This article reviews the pathophysiology, etiology and risk factors, evaluation, management, and outcomes of spontaneous cervical artery dissection.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Cervical artery dissection is believed to be a multifactorial disease, with environmental factors serving as possible triggers in patients who have a genetic predisposition to dissection formation. Cervical artery dissection can cause local symptoms or ischemic events, such as ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Neuroimaging is used to confirm the diagnosis; classic findings include a long tapered arterial stenosis or occlusion, dissecting aneurysm, intimal flap, double lumen, or intramural hematoma. Patients with cervical artery dissection who present with an acute ischemic stroke should be evaluated for IV thrombolysis, endovascular therapy eligibility, or both. Antithrombotic therapy with either anticoagulation or antiplatelet treatment is used to prevent stroke from cervical artery dissection. The risk of recurrent ischemia appears low and is mostly limited to the first two weeks after symptom onset.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Cervical artery dissection is a known cause of ischemic strokes. Current data show no difference between the benefits and risks of anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy in the acute phase of symptomatic extracranial cervical artery dissection, thereby supporting the recommendation that clinicians can prescribe either treatment. Further research is warranted to better understand the pathophysiology and long-term outcomes of cervical artery dissection.

Newer Updates in Pediatric Vascular Diseases

Pediatric neurovascular pathology directly involves or is in close proximity to the central nervous system (CNS). These vascular pathologies can occur in isolation or in association with broader syndromes. While some vascular pathologies are unique to the pediatric population, the full spectrum of adult neurovascular lesions can also affect children however, may present differently both clinically and on diagnostic imaging. Non-invasive (Ultrasound, CT, MRI) imaging plays a critical role in the diagnosis, treatment planning, and follow-up of vascular lesions involving the CNS. The modality can be chosen based on the age of the child, urgency of diagnosis, and local availability. Each modality has sensitivities and specificities which vary based on the location and imaging findings of a specific neurovascular pathology. In addition to non-invasive options, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) may be used as both a diagnostic and therapeutic imaging method for pediatric vascular lesions of the central nervous system. The diagnosis and management of pediatric cerebrovascular disease requires the close collaboration between pediatricians and pediatric specialists including neuroradiologists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, cardiologists, neurointerventionalists, and anesthesiologists among others. A detailed understanding of imaging findings, natural history, and treatment options is essential to guide and monitor imaging and treatment. The goal of this review is to provide the reader with an overview on pediatric neurovascular pathologies, provide examples of pathognomonic imaging findings, and present a brief review of endovascular treatment options, if applicable.

Hemostatic and Thrombotic Considerations in the Diagnosis and Management of Childhood Arterial Ischemic Stroke: A Narrative Review

Although rare in children, arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) is associated with increased mortality and neurological morbidity. The incidence of AIS after the neonatal period is approximately 1-2/100,000/year, with an estimated mortality of 3-7%. A significant proportion of children surviving AIS experience life-long neurological deficits including hemiparesis, epilepsy, and cognitive delays. The low incidence of childhood AIS coupled with atypical clinical-presentation and lack of awareness contribute to delay in diagnosis and consequently, the early initiation of treatment. While randomized-clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of reperfusion therapies including thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy in appropriately-selected adult patients, similar data for children are unavailable. Consequently, clinical decisions surrounding reperfusion therapy in childhood AIS are either extrapolated from adult data or based on local experience. The etiology of childhood AIS is multifactorial, often occurring in the setting of both acquired and congenital risk-factors including thrombophilia. While multiple studies have investigated the association of thrombophilia with incident childhood AIS, its impact on stroke recurrence and therefore duration and intensity of antithrombotic therapy is less clear. Despite these limitations, a significant progress has been made over the last decade in the management of childhood AIS. This progress can be attributed to international consortiums, and in selected cohorts to federally-funded clinical trials. In this narrative review, the authors have systematically appraised the literature and summarize the hemostatic and thrombotic considerations in the diagnosis and management of childhood AIS focusing on the evidence supporting reperfusion therapies, relevance of thrombophilia testing, and duration and drug choices for secondary-prophylaxis.

Acute Hospital Management of Pediatric Stroke

The field of pediatric stroke has historically been hampered by limited evidence and small patient cohorts. However the landscape of childhood stroke is rapidly changing due in part to increasing awareness of the importance of pediatric stroke and the emergence of dedicated pediatric stroke centers, care pathways, and alert systems. Acute pediatric stroke management hinges on timely diagnosis confirmed by neuroimaging, appropriate consideration of recanalization therapies, implementation of neuroprotective measures, and attention to secondary prevention. Because pediatric stroke is highly heterogenous in etiology, management strategies must be individualized. Determining a child's underlying stroke etiology is essential to appropriately tailoring hyperacute stroke management and determining best approach to secondary prevention. Herein, we review the methods of recognition, diagnosis, management, current knowledge gaps and promising research for pediatric stroke.

Cervical Artery Dissections: Etiopathogenesis and Management

Cervical Artery Dissection (CeAD) is a frequent stroke etiology for patients younger than 50 years old. The most common immediate complications related to CeAD are headache and neck pain (65-95%), TIA/ischemic stroke (>50%), and partial Horner's syndrome (25%). The prevailing hypothesis regarding the pathogenesis of sCeAD is that the underlying constitutional vessel wall weakness of patients with sCeAD is genetically determined and that environmental factors could act as triggers. The stroke prevention treatment of CeAD remains controversial, involving anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy and potentially emergent stenting and/or thrombectomy or angioplasty for selected cases of carotid artery dissection with occlusion. The treatment of headache associated with CeAD depends on the headache phenotype and comorbidities. Radiographically, more than 75% of CeAD cases present with occlusion or non-occlusive stenosis. Many patients demonstrate partial and complete healing, more commonly in the carotid arteries. One-fifth of the patients develop dissecting pseudoaneurysm, but this is a benign clinical entity with an extremely low rupture and stroke recurrence risk. Good recovery is achieved in many CeAD cases, and mortality remains low. Family history of CeAD, connective tissue disorders like Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, and fibromuscular dysplasia are risk factors for recurrent CeAD, which can occur in 3-9% of the cases. This review serves as a comprehensive, updated overview of CeAD, emphasizing etiopathogenesis and management.

The Clinical Features of Dissection of the Cervical Brain-Supplying Arteries

BACKGROUND

Dissections of the cervical brain-supplying arteries are a leading cause of ischemic stroke in young adults, with an annual incidence of 2.5-3 / 100 000 for carotid artery dissection and 1-1.5 / 100 000 for vertebral artery dissection. It can be assumed that many cases go unreported. We present the clinical features here to help physicians diagnose this disease entity as rapidly as possible.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed.

RESULTS

Spontaneous dissection of the internal carotid or vertebral artery is characterized by a hematoma in the vessel wall. It often arises in connection with minor injuries; underlying weakness of the arterial wall (possibly only temporary) may be a predisposing factor. Acute unilateral pain is the main presenting symptom. In internal carotid dissection, the site of the pain is temporal in 46% of cases, and frontal in 19%; in vertebral artery dissection, it is nuchal and occipital in 80%. Pain and local findings, such as Horner syndrome, are generally present from the beginning, while stroke may arise only after a latency of hours to days. If the diagnosis is made early with MRI, CT, or ultrasound, and anticoagulation or antiplatelet drugs can help prevent a stroke, yet none of these methods can detect all cases. Recurrent dissection is rare, except in patients with connective tissue diseases such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or fibromuscular dysplasia. Spontaneous dissection of the great vessels of the neck must be differentiated from aortic dissection spreading to the supra-aortic vessels and from traumatic dissection due to blunt or penetrating vascular trauma.

CONCLUSION

Dissection of the cervical brain-supplying vessels is not always revealed by the imaging methods that are used to detect it. Stroke prevention thus depends on the physician's being aware of the symptoms and signs of this disease entity, so that early diagnosis can be followed by appropriate treatment.

Antiplatelets Versus Anticoagulation in Cervical Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 2064 Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In young people aged < 50 years, cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is among the most common causes of stroke. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the safest and most effective antithrombotic treatment for CeAD. We aimed to synthesize concrete evidence from studies that compared the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet (AP) versus anticoagulant (AC) therapies for CeAD.

METHODS

We searched major electronic databases/search engines from inception till September 2021. Cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anticoagulants with antiplatelets for CeAD were included. A meta-analysis was conducted using articles that were obtained and found to be relevant. Mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used for continuous data and odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for dichotomous data.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 15 studies involving 2064 patients, 909 (44%) of whom received antiplatelets and 1155 (56%) received anticoagulants. Our analysis showed a non-significant difference in terms of the 3-month mortality (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.03-7.58), > 3-month mortality (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.40-6.56), recurrent stroke (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.46-2.02), recurrent transient ischaemic attack (TIA) (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.44-1.98), symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.12-1.19), and complete recanalization (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.46-1.06). Regarding primary ischaemic stroke, the results favoured AC over AP among RCTs (OR 6.97, 95% CI 1.25-38.83).

CONCLUSION

Our study did not show a considerable difference between the two groups, as all outcomes showed non-significant differences between them, except for primary ischaemic stroke (RCTs) and complete recanalization (observational studies), which showed a significant favour of AC over AP. Even though primary ischaemic stroke is an important outcome, several crucial points that could affect these results should be paid attention to. These include the incomplete adjustment for the confounding effect of AP-AC doses, frequencies, administration compliance, and others. We recommend more well-designed studies to assess if unnecessary anticoagulation can be avoided in CeAD.

Trends in post-discharge prophylactic anticoagulant use among stroke patients in the United States between 2006 and 2019

BACKGROUND

Stroke is an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although the risk of VTE persists after hospital discharge, information on the utilization of anticoagulants among stroke patients after discharge remains limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate changes in post-discharge thromboprophylaxis among stroke patients between 2006 and 2019.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective repeated cross-sectional analysis using a commercial healthcare insurance database in the United States. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years with incident stroke diagnosis and assessed prophylactic use of anticoagulants in the 30 days following hospital discharge including low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin ≤40 mg/day, dalteparin ≤5000 IU/day), unfractionated heparin ≤5000 IU/ twice daily or 3 times a day, apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily, and rivaroxaban 10 mg/day. Patients with atrial fibrillation, VTE, mechanical heart valves, cancer, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, and users of therapeutic doses of anticoagulants were excluded. We used the Cochrane-Armitage test to assess changes in the use of anticoagulants across the study period.

RESULTS

There was a small increase in the overall use of post-discharge prophylactic anticoagulants among stroke patients between 2006 and 2019 from 0.5% to 1.9%. The use of heparin decreased from 0.5% in 2006 to 0.3% in 2019 (P-value for trend = 0.001). In contrast, the use of apixaban or rivaroxaban increased from 0.1% in 2013 to 1.6% in 2019 (P-value for trend < 0.001). Apixaban was more commonly used than rivaroxaban.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based study of stroke patients, we found that post-discharge anticoagulant use remains low through 2019. Prophylactic use of heparin or rivaroxaban was relatively low but the use of apixaban increased over the study period. Further research is needed to determine if these agents are safe and effective for VTE prevention in stroke patients.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of carotid artery stenting for the treatment of cervical carotid artery dissection

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of carotid artery stenting for the treatment of extracranial carotid artery dissection (CAD).

DATA SOURCES

Systematic review using Medline, Scopus, EMBASE and Cochrane Library.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. Data from the eligible studies were extracted and meta-analyzed. Primary endpoints included postoperative mortality, cerebrovascular events (CE) and modified Rankin Score for neurologic disability (mRS) at 90 days. We performed subgroup analyses between stenting of spontaneous and traumatic CAD, primary stenting versus stenting after failed medical therapy (FMT) and stenting of CAD in the presence of tandem occlusions versus stenting of isolated extracranial CAD.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies with 1,224 patients were included. Pooled post-operative mortality, CE and mRS 0-2 rates were 1.71% (95%CI:0.83-2.80), 6.45% (95%CI:2.80-11.10) and 76.13% (95%CI:64.15-86.50), respectively. The pooled stroke rate was 2.16% (95%CI:0.0-6.64). Spontaneous versus traumatic CAD mortality rates were 3.20% (95%CI:1.80-4.88) and 0.00% (95%CI:0.00-1.59) while CE rates were 14.26% (95%CI:6.28-24.36) and 1.64% (95%CI:0.0-6.08). Primary stenting and stenting after FMT mortality rates were 0.63% (95%CI:0.0-5.63) and 0.0% (95%CI:0.0-2.24), while CE rates were 5.02% (95%CI:0.38-12.63) and 3.33% (95%CI:0.12-9.03). Mortality rates for tandem occlusions and isolated extracranial CAD were 5.62% (95%CI:1.76-10.83) and 0.23% (95%CI:0.0-1.88) respectively, while CE rates were 15.28% (95%CI:6.23-26.64) and 1.88% (95%CI:0.23-4.51). The methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) score was 8.66 (low).

CONCLUSION

Both primary stenting and stenting of spontaneous CAD yielded unfavorable results regarding stent thrombosis and stroke rates. Conversely, stenting following FMT displayed acceptable mortality and complication rates corroborating the use of stenting in the setting of CAD as a second line treatment. Due to the low quality of the included studies, definite conclusions cannot be drawn necessitating further research.

Vitamin K antagonist versus novel oral anticoagulants for management of cervical artery dissection: Interactive systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose:

Cervical artery dissection (CAD) represents a unique clinical entity with a high risk of ischemic stroke. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) showed good efficacy in CAD management but are cumbersome to use with potentially higher bleeding rates. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are easier to use and may have similar effects but lower hemorrhagic risk. In this systematic review, we compare the efficacy of NOAC to VKA as a potential alternative treatment.

Methods:

The literature was searched on Pubmed, PMC, and Embase via API through the Nested Knowledge AutoLit software in February 2022 for studies evaluating both NOAC and VKA. Baseline characteristics, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and hemorrhagic and ischemic complications were collected for single and double-arm studies and analyzed using random-effect subgroup meta-analysis.

Findings:

Overall, 11 studies were included with 699 patients treated with VKA and 53 treated with NOAC (from three studies; two were head-to-head comparative studies). There was no statistical difference in the baseline characteristics of VKA and NOAC patients. The rates of TIA/stroke in VKA and NOAC groups were 12.3% (95% CI; 0%, 28.6%) and 5.7% (95% CI; 0%, 12.2%), respectively. Major bleeding or intracranial bleeding were comparable between groups. Lesions treated with VKA showed angiographic recanalization with a rate of 51.4% (95% CI; 35.6%, 67.1%) and for those treated with NOAC was 58.4% (95% CI; 23.9%, 93.9%). The rates of good clinical outcomes were 79.9% (95% CI; 67.6%, 92.2%) in the VKA group and 91.4% (95% CI; 78.1%, 100%) in NOAC. No statistical difference was noted among any of the outcomes between the two treatment groups.

Discussion and conclusion:

We highlighted comparable efficacy and safety of NOAC to VKA for stroke prevention in CAD. Further head-to-head studies are warranted to validate these results.

Antithrombotic therapy in the postacute phase of cervical artery dissection: the Italian Project on Stroke in Young Adults Cervical Artery Dissection

OBJECTIVE

To explore the impact of antithrombotic therapy discontinuation in the postacute phase of cervical artery dissection (CeAD) on the mid-term outcome of these patients.

METHODS

In a cohort of consecutive patients with first-ever CeAD, enrolled in the setting of the multicentre Italian Project on Stroke in Young Adults Cervical Artery Dissection, we compared postacute (beyond 6 months since the index CeAD) outcomes between patients who discontinued antithrombotic therapy and patients who continued taking antithrombotic agents during follow-up. Primary outcome was a composite of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack. Secondary outcomes were (1) Brain ischaemia ipsilateral to the dissected vessel and (2) Recurrent CeAD. Associations with the outcome of interest were assessed by the propensity score (PS) method.

RESULTS

Of the 1390 patients whose data were available for the outcome analysis (median follow-up time in patients who did not experience outcome events, 36.0 months (25th-75th percentile, 62.0)), 201 (14.4%) discontinued antithrombotic treatment. Primary outcome occurred in 48 patients in the postacute phase of CeAD. In PS-matched samples (201 vs 201), the incidence of primary outcomes among patients taking antithrombotics was comparable with that among patients who discontinued antithrombotics during follow-up (5.0% vs 4.5%; p(log rank test)=0.526), and so was the incidence of the secondary outcomes ipsilateral brain ischaemia (4.5% vs 2.5%; p(log rank test)=0.132) and recurrent CeAD (1.0% vs 1.5%; p(log rank test)=0.798).

CONCLUSIONS

Discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy in the postacute phase of CeAD does not appear to increase the risk of brain ischaemia during follow-up.

Antiplatelets or anticoagulants? Secondary prevention in cervical artery dissection: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Extracranial artery dissection involving either internal carotid artery or vertebral artery is a major cause of stroke in adults under 50 years of age. There is no conclusive evidence whether antiplatelets or anticoagulants are better suited in the treatment of extracranial artery dissection.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether antiplatelets or anticoagulants have advantage over the other in the treatment of extracranial artery dissection for secondary prevention of recurrent ischemic events or death.

METHODS

Present meta-analysis followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Database search was done in Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 2021 using pre-defined search strategy. Additional studies were identified from reference lists from included studies, reviews and previous meta-analyses. Outcome measures were ischaemic stroke, ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and death.

RESULTS

Two RCTs and 64 observational studies were included in the meta-analysis. While the outcome measures of stroke, stroke or TIA and death were numerically higher with antiplatelet use, there were no statistically significant differences between antiplatelets and anticoagulants.

CONCLUSION

We found no significant difference between antiplatelet and anticoagulation treatment after extracranial artery dissection. The choice of treatment should be tailored to individual cases.

Atorvastatin for unruptured intracranial vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysm (ATREAT-VBD): protocol for a randomised, double-blind, blank-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms (VBDAs) are associated with serious complications and a poor prognosis. It is believed that inflammation of the aneurysm wall may be the main cause of rupture or deterioration. Atorvastatin has been shown to inhibit inflammation and may be a suitable drug candidate. Here, we report a clinical research study protocol to investigate whether atorvastatin inhibits inflammation of the aneurysm wall, as measured by signal index enhancement.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We have designed a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, blank-controlled clinical trial. 40 patients with non-ruptured VBDAs with enhancement aneurysm walls will be enrolled in Beijing Tiantan Hospital. Eligible patients will be randomly divided into two treatment groups, at a ratio of 1:1, to receive atorvastatin 20 mg orally for 6 months or no treatment. The primary assessment outcome will be the change in aneurysm wall enhancement, as measured by the signal index during the 6-month treatment period. The secondary assessment outcomes will be the aneurysm morphology (intramural haematoma, dissection valve and false lumen) and changes in the concentrations of inflammatory factors, including C reactive protein, tumour necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-6.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol has been approved by the medical ethics committee of the Beijing Tiantan Hospital at which the work will be conducted (Approval No. KY 2019-024-02). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings from the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04943783.

Spontaneous Dissections of Bilateral Internal Carotid and Vertebral Arteries due to Intractable Vomiting

In young adults, spontaneous craniocervical arterial dissections (sCAD), which involve the major arteries of the head and neck, are associated with an increased risk of stroke. sCAD occurs in the absence of major trauma as seen in traumatic craniocervical artery dissection. It may affect unilateral or bilateral carotid or vertebral arteries. Cases of spontaneous bilateral carotid and vertebral artery dissections occurring simultaneously are extremely rare. We present a case of a 49-year-old female with no history of arteriopathy who presented with aphasia and right upper extremity weakness and was found to have dissections in bilateral extracranial and intracranial carotid arteries, as well as the bilateral vertebral arteries. She had symptomatic improvement with antithrombotic therapy and aggressive outpatient rehabilitation.

Craniocervical Artery Dissections: A Concise Review for Clinicians

Craniocervical artery dissection (CAD), although uncommon, can affect the young and lead to devastating complications, including stroke and subarachnoid hemorrhage. It starts with a tear in the intima of a vessel with subsequent formation of an intramural hematoma. Most CAD occurs spontaneously or after minor trauma. Patients with CAD may exhibit isolated symptoms of an underlying subclinical connective tissue disorder or have a clinically diagnosed connective tissue disorder. Emergent evaluation and computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance imaging/angiography of the head and neck are required to screen for and to diagnose CAD. Carotid ultrasound is not recommended as an initial test because of limited anatomic windows; diagnostic catheter-based angiography is reserved for atypical cases or acutely if severe neurologic deficits are present. Patients with CAD can present with focal neurologic deficits due to ischemia (thromboembolism or arterial occlusion) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (pseudoaneurysm formation and rupture). Also common are local symptoms, such as head and neck pain, pulsatile tinnitus, Horner syndrome, and cranial neuropathy, or cervical radiculopathy from mass effect. Acute management of transient ischemic attack/stroke in CAD is not different from the management of ischemic stroke of other causes. Patients with CAD need long-term antithrombotic therapy for secondary stroke prevention. Anticoagulation or dual antiplatelet therapy followed by single antiplatelet therapy is recommended for extracranial CAD and antiplatelet therapy for intracranial CAD. Recurrent ischemic events and dissections are rare and typically occur early. Patients with CAD should avoid deep neck massage or chiropractic neck manipulation involving sudden excessive, forced neck movements.

Carotid artery dissection in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria: a case report

Background

Strokes in the paediatric age group have their own epidemiology and aetiology and are frequently misdiagnosed. As in the adult population, they present some risk factors that must be identified. Cerebral arteriopathies as a cause of paediatric ischaemic stroke present a very diverse aetiology and morphology.

In this article we report a paediatric stroke in a patient who was diagnosed during his first months of life of Hutchinson-Gilford´s Progeria (HGP). This is a rare genetic condition caused by mutations in the LMNA gene, producing an aberrant lamin A protein. The disease leads to premature aging, and cardiovascular complications are the first cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 5-year-old patient with HGP (missense mutation—de novo—c.1822G > A in heterozygosis, LMNA gene). The patient was diagnosed during his first year of life and presented distinct phenotypical features. No other relevant comorbidities were present.

He was admitted to the emergency department for right hemiparesis with at least 4 h of evolution, with inability to open the hand and slight decrease in the level of consciousness (pedNIHSS 5–6). Cranial-CT and angio-CT showed findings indicative of left carotid dissection. Consensus was reached on conservative medical management with anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. In the first few days, the patient had a favourable evolution with resolution of the right lower limb hemiparesis and, one month after discharge, of the hand paresis.

Conclusions

The clinical manifestations, the vascular phenotype of the genetic mutation and the location of the radiological signs on a specific vascular morphology are indicative of carotid dissection. Spontaneous dissections occur under a predisposing risk factor or disease and are an exceptional finding in patients with HGP.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-022-03179-4.

Clinical and radiological features of medullary infarction caused by spontaneous vertebral artery dissection

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Medullary infarction (MI) caused by spontaneous vertebral artery dissection (sVAD) is an important type of stroke. It is important to distinguish sVAD from other causes of stroke since the treatment strategies and prognosis were different between them. In this study, we aimed to explore the clinical and radiological features of MI in patients with acute MI caused by sVAD.

METHODS

Patients with acute MI caused by sVAD and non-sVAD in a single tertiary hospital were enrolled from 2010 to 2020. Epidemiologic, clinical and image features were collected and analysed. MI lesions were categorised into three levels rostrocaudally and four arterial groups: anteromedial, anterolateral, lateral and posterior.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients with MI were enrolled with 47 cases of sVAD and 81 cases of non-sVAD. Patients with sVAD were younger than those with non-sVAD (med 44 years old vs 58 years old). The sVAD group was less likely to have hypertension (44.68% vs 67.90%; p=0.010) and diabetes (19.15% vs 45.69%; p=0.003), but more likely to have non-sudden onset (27.66% vs 9.87%, p=0.009), minor neck injury (19.15% vs 1.23%; p=0.001) and headache (46.81% vs 7.41%; p=0.000). Vertically, sVAD became more common in caudal medulla than in rostral medulla. Horizontally, the sVAD group was more likely to have lateral MI (91.48% vs 2.96%, p=0.000). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, age, non-sudden onset and headache were independently associated with sVAD with ORs of 0.935 (95% CI 0.892 to 0.981, p=0.006), 3.507 (95% CI 1.060 to 11.599, p=0.040) and 5.426 (95% CI 1.673 to 17.599, p=0.005).

CONCLUSION

sVAD was not uncommon in patients with MI, especially in patients with lateral MI. Young patients with headache and non-sudden onset should remind clinician the possibility of sVAD.