What constitutes target validation?

Emerging preclinical pharmacological targets for Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurological condition caused by the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the basal ganglia. It is the most prevalent form of Parkinsonism, categorized by cardinal features such as bradykinesia, rigidity, tremors, and postural instability. Due to the multicentric pathology of PD involving inflammation, oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, apoptosis, and protein aggregation, it has become difficult to pin-point a single therapeutic target and evaluate its potential application. Currently available drugs for treating PD provide only symptomatic relief and do not decrease or avert disease progression resulting in poor patient satisfaction and compliance. Significant amount of understanding concerning the pathophysiology of PD has offered a range of potential targets for PD. Several emerging targets including AAV-hAADC gene therapy, phosphodiesterase-4, potassium channels, myeloperoxidase, acetylcholinesterase, MAO-B, dopamine, A2A, mGlu5, and 5-HT-1A/1B receptors are in different stages of clinical development. Additionally, alternative interventions such as deep brain stimulation, thalamotomy, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and gamma knife surgery, are also being developed for patients with advanced PD. As much as these therapeutic targets hold potential to delay the onset and reverse the disease, more targets and alternative interventions need to be examined in different stages of PD. In this review, we discuss various emerging preclinical pharmacological targets that may serve as a new promising neuroprotective strategy that could actually help alleviate PD and its symptoms.

Principles of early drug discovery

Developing a new drug from original idea to the launch of a finished product is a complex process which can take 12-15 years and cost in excess of $1 billion. The idea for a target can come from a variety of sources including academic and clinical research and from the commercial sector. It may take many years to build up a body of supporting evidence before selecting a target for a costly drug discovery programme. Once a target has been chosen, the pharmaceutical industry and more recently some academic centres have streamlined a number of early processes to identify molecules which possess suitable characteristics to make acceptable drugs. This review will look at key preclinical stages of the drug discovery process, from initial target identification and validation, through assay development, high throughput screening, hit identification, lead optimization and finally the selection of a candidate molecule for clinical development.

The multiple orthogonal tools approach to define molecular causation in the validation of druggable targets

Many genetic (gene deletion, interruption or mutation), epigenetic (such as antisense or small interfering RNA) and immunological methods are being applied in 'high-throughput target validation' studies of the novel potential targets arising from whole genome sequencing. Such applications often focus on 'loss of function' approaches. However, target validation is most reliable when multiple orthogonal approaches are used. Initiating a target-based discovery project based on correlative evidence is faster than awaiting causative evidence. Indeed, the multiple tools needed to generate firm proof usually include methods and reagents only generated after starting a discovery project with little evidence beyond correlations. Robust and rigorous tests of whether a drug candidate is efficacious in vivo because of its effects on a specific molecular particular target are best made by simultaneously applying multiple orthogonal tools. Examples of the orthogonal tools approach will be discussed.