Type I interferon inhibitor anifrolumab in active systemic lupus erythematosus (TULIP-1): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

No clear influence of treatment escalation on flare prevention in serologically active clinically quiescent patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study

This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of treatment escalation by initiating therapeutic agents in serologically active clinically quiescent (SACQ) patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We retrospectively evaluated SACQ patients with SLE for ≥ 180 days, with the introduction of a therapeutic agent for SLE defined as exposure. The efficacy endpoints included the time to flare and time to remission, whereas the safety endpoint was the incidence of adverse events. The efficacy endpoints were assessed via Cox proportional hazards model with time-dependent covariates, which included exposure, serological activity, and prednisolone dose. Among 109 SACQ patients, 24 were initiated on the following therapeutic agents for SLE: hydroxychloroquine (10 patients), belimumab (6 patients), and immunosuppressive agents (8 patients). A total of 37 patients experienced a flare (8 and 29 patients during exposure and nonexposure periods, respectively). The time to flare was comparable between the exposure and control groups. Among 68 patients who were not in remission at the start of observation, 27 patients achieved remission (5 and 22 patients during exposure and nonexposure periods, respectively). Although both groups had a similar time to remission, the exposure group treated with belimumab had a significantly higher rate of remission than the control group. The adverse events were more frequent during the exposure period than during the nonexposure period. Thus, this study did not reveal a clear influence of treatment escalation on flare prevention and remission achievement.

Modelling long-term outcomes for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

New treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) aim to improve tolerability and disease activity control over standard of care (SoC) treatment. SoC typically includes daily glucocorticoid (GC) which carries a risk of organ damage over time. This study sought to develop natural history models to identify predictors of long-term outcomes with current SoC SLE treatment.

METHODS

Generalized linear and parametric accelerated failure time survival models (GLM) and parametric accelerated failure time (AFT) survival models were designed to identify predictors of disease activity, flare rate, GC use, organ damage, and mortality beyond the first year of treatment in patients with SLE. Models were run using a longitudinal retrospective analysis of prospectively collected Toronto Lupus Cohort (TLC) study data, collected between 1997 and 2020. Covariates of clinical and statistical significance were selected by bivariate- then multi-variate regression to find the model of best fit.

FINDINGS

Of the 1255 subjects included, 89 % were female 89 % and 65 % Caucasian. Mean follow-up was 10·5 years. At first visit, 51 % of patients had moderate-to-severe disease activity (SLEDAI-2 K score ≥ 6). Mean organ damage scores gradually increased over the years following diagnosis. Median survival of the cohort was ∼35 years from study entry. In the GLM models, SLEDAI-2 K yearly average, and average GC dose were key for predicting change in SLEDAI-2 K, GC use/ dose, and flare (any/rate). Together, adjusted mean SLEDAI-2 K and GC dose were shown to be predictors of mortality and damage in at least 9 of 12 organ systems considered.

INTERPRETATION

These comprehensive, longitudinal, predictive models show that disease activity and GC use are significant predictors of organ damage and mortality in a patient population with predominantly moderate to severe SLE. This deepens understanding of SLE natural history and underscores the need for new treatment approaches that reduce disease activity and GC use with an aim to improve long-term SLE outcomes.

FUNDING

This study was funded by AstraZeneca.

Transcriptomic studies unravel the molecular and cellular complexity of systemic lupus erythematosus: A review

Transcriptomic analysis plays a vital role in investigating Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), a complex autoimmune disease characterized by diverse clinical manifestations. This approach has yielded valuable insights into gene expression patterns and molecular regulatory mechanisms involved in SLE pathogenesis. Notably, interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) signatures are significantly upregulated in immune cells, skin, and kidney. Although a correlation with serological parameters and clinical symptoms has been proposed, the association with global disease activities remains controversial. Key findings in the field include an upregulated plasmablast signature, which positively correlates with disease activity; a neutrophil signature associated with lupus nephritis; and a decreased lymphocyte signature, reflecting lymphopenia. Tissue-level studies highlight the critical role of infiltrating immune cells in organ damage. Future research should leverage advanced technologies and integrate multi-omics data to deepen our understanding of SLE's molecular underpinnings, facilitating the development of targeted therapies.

The Potential Use of Arsenic Trioxide in the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Arsenic trioxide (ATO) is now part of the standard regimen for the treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia. The availability of an oral form of ATO has greatly reduced the incidence of cardiotoxicity as compared to intravenous (IV) administration. Increasing evidence suggests that ATO has anti-inflammatory properties that may be useful for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. These include the modulation of Treg cell activation, Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg balance, depletion of activated T cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells, and influence of B-cell differentiation, leading to reduced autoantibody and cytokine production. ATO has also been shown to induce apoptosis of activated fibroblast-like synoviocytes through the generation of reactive oxygen species and alter the gut microbiota in collagen-induced arthritis. Despite the emergence of newer treatment modalities, the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), especially refractory manifestations, remains a challenge, owing to the paucity of effective biological and targeted therapies that are devoid of adverse effects. Oral ATO is an attractive option for the treatment of SLE because of the lower cost of production, convenience of administration, and reduced cardiotoxicity. This article summarizes the anti-inflammatory mechanisms of ATO and its potential application in the treatment of SLE and other rheumatic diseases.

Newer Therapies in Rheumatology

Seven of the 11 newer medications recently or soon to be approved to treat rheumatologic diseases discussed in this article are biologic agents and reflect the current ability of science to target specific components of the immune system. The other agents are molecules that are directed against specific immune pathway targets as well. All have shown superiority to placebo and in some cases have been compared to currently accepted therapies. Safety issues are generally centered around infections due to the immune-interrupting nature of these therapies.

Tofacitinib versus thalidomide for mucocutaneous lesions of systemic lupus erythematosus: A real-world CSTAR cohort study XXVII

OBJECTIVE

Thalidomide is an effective medication for refractory mucocutaneous lesions of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and can treat arthritis in some autoimmune diseases, but it has some adverse reactions. Recently, the effectiveness of tofacitinib in treating mucocutaneous lesions of SLE has been reported. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib with thalidomide in treating mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal lesions in patients with SLE.

METHODS

This study was a real-world cohort study based on the Chinese SLE Treatment and Research group (CSTAR) registry. SLE patients who manifested mucocutaneous and/or musculoskeletal symptoms and were prescribed tofacitinib or thalidomide were included. We retrospectively conducted comparisons between the tofacitinib and thalidomide groups regarding clinical improvements, SLE disease activity, serological indicators, glucocorticoid doses, and adverse events at the 1, 3, and 6-months time points.

RESULTS

At 3 and 6 months, the tofacitinib group exhibited a higher proportion of patients with improvement in mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal issues. Additionally, a greater percentage of patients in the tofacitinib group achieved remission or a low disease activity state (LLDAS) at these time points. No significant serological improvements were observed in either the tofacitinib or thalidomide groups. Fewer adverse events were observed in the tofacitinib group than in the thalidomide group.

CONCLUSIONS

Tofacitinib might be superior to thalidomide in the improvement of mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal lesions in SLE, and had a good safety profile.

Safety and efficacy of anifrolumab therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus in real-world clinical practice: LOOPS registry

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and efficacy of anifrolumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classified based on the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) in real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study involved SLE patients who started anifrolumab therapy. The primary end point was the retention rate over 26 weeks after initiating anifrolumab therapy; 45 patients followed up for 12 weeks or longer were analysed in the following groups to determine the safety and efficacy up to week 12 after treatment initiation: (i) non-LLDAS achievement group and (ii) minor flare group. Safety and efficacy were compared between the minor flare group and the standard of care (SoC) group (treated by adding glucocorticoids [GCs] or immunosuppressants) after adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score (PS-IPTW).

RESULTS

The retention rate of anifrolumab was 89.7% at week 26.The LLDAS achievement rates at week 12 were 42.9% and 66.7% in the non-LLDAS achievement and minor flare groups, respectively. In both groups, GC doses and SELENA-SLEDAI score significantly decreased. When the anifrolumab group with minor flare was compared with the SoC group or the GC dose increase group, the GC dose and SLEDAI score were significantly lower in the anifrolumab group than in either of the other groups; there was no significant difference in LLDAS achievement.

CONCLUSION

At week 26 after initiating anifrolumab therapy, ∼90% of patients remained on therapy. Anifrolumab might lower disease activity without initiating GCs and reduce GC doses, especially in patients who experience minor flares after LLDAS achievement.

The State of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rheumatology

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the quality and timeliness of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure reporting, which have not been previously studied.

METHODS

Clinical trials that informed new US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for the first rheumatological indication between 1995 and 2021 were identified. Data were recorded to determine whether collected PROs were published, met minimum clinically important difference (MCID) or statistical significance (P < 0.05) thresholds, and were consistent with Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)-PRO standards. Hazard ratios and Kaplan-Meier estimate were used to assess the time from FDA approval to PRO publication.

RESULTS

Thirty-one FDA approvals corresponded with 110 pivotal trials and 262 reported PROs. Of the 90 included studies, 1 (1.1%) met all 5 recommended items, 10 (11.1%) met 4 items, 17 (18.9%) met 3 items, 21 (23.3%) met 2 items, 26 (28.9%) met 1 item, and 15 (16.7%) met none of the reporting standards. Most PROs met MCID thresholds (149/262; 56.9%) and were statistically significant (223/262; 85.1%). Of our subset analysis, one-third of PROs were not published upfront (70/212; 33%) and 1 of 9 (22/212; 10.4%) remained unpublished ≥ 4 years after initial trial reporting. Publication rates were highest for the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (97.4%) and lowest for the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (81.8%). Less than half of these published PROs met MCID and statistical significance thresholds (94/212; 44.3%).

CONCLUSION

One in 9 PROs remained unpublished for ≥ 4 years after initial trial reporting, and compliance with CONSORT-PRO reporting guidelines was poor. Efforts should be made to ensure PROs are adequately reported and expeditiously published.

Monoclonal antibodies targeting interleukins for systemic lupus erythematosus: updates in early clinical drug development

INTRODUCTION

The advent of biological therapies has already revolutionized treatment strategies and disease course of several rheumatologic conditions, and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting cytokines and interleukins represent a considerable portion of this family of drugs. In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) dysregulation of different cytokine and interleukin-related pathways have been linked to disease development and perpetration, offering palatable therapeutic targets addressable via such mAbs.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we provide an overview of the different biological therapies under development targeting cytokines and interleukins, with a focus on mAbs, while providing the rationale behind their choice as therapeutic targets and analyzing the scientific evidence linking them to SLE pathogenesis.

EXPERT OPINION

An unprecedented number of clinical trials on biological drugs targeting different immunological pathways are ongoing in SLE. Their success might allow us to tackle present challenges of SLE management, including the overuse of glucocorticoids in daily clinical practice, as well as SLE heterogenicity in treatment response among different individuals, hopefully paving the way toward precision medicine.

[EULAR recommendations 2023 on the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus -Implications for treatment in Germany]

The 2023 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) faced several tasks: the newly approved medications anifrolumab and voclosporin as well as the additional approval of belimumab for lupus nephritis had to be conceptionally fitted into the management of SLE. Novel data on hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids, additional results for the treat-to-target goals remission and low disease activity and experience with respect to vaccinations and infections had to be considered. Additionally, EULAR specified a slightly modified structure. The update was further developed with 5 overarching principles and 13 recommendations. An SLE activity score is required for each patient visit. All SLE patients should receive hydroxychloroquine at a target dose of 5 mg/kg body weight. Glucocorticoids should only be used if necessary and reduced to not more than 5 mg prednisone equivalent daily in the long-term or, even better, tapered off. If the target of remission or low disease activity is not reached, methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate and/or belimumab or anifrolumab should be used. For lupus nephritis, Euro-Lupus cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate are options for induction therapy and mycophenolate or azathioprine for maintenance. In the case of severe nephritis, the addition of belimumab or a calcineurin inhibitor (voclosporin or tacrolimus) should be considered. It is important that treatment should be continued for at least 3 years. This review article describes the details of the new recommendations against the background of relevant studies in recent years and classifies them in the clinical context.

Type I interferon blockade with anifrolumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus modulates key immunopathological pathways in a gene expression and proteomic analysis of two phase 3 trials

INTRODUCTION

Anifrolumab is a type I interferon (IFN) receptor 1 (IFNAR1) blocking antibody approved for treating patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Here, we investigated the immunomodulatory mechanisms of anifrolumab using longitudinal transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of the 52-week, randomised, phase 3 TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials.

METHODS

Patients with moderate to severe SLE were enrolled in TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 and received intravenous anifrolumab or placebo alongside standard therapy. Whole-blood expression of 18 017 genes using genome-wide RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) (pooled TULIP; anifrolumab, n=244; placebo, n=258) and 184 plasma proteins using Olink and Simoa panels (TULIP-1; anifrolumab, n=124; placebo, n=132) were analysed. We compared treatment groups via gene set enrichment analysis using MetaBase pathway analysis, blood transcriptome modules, in silico deconvolution of RNA-seq and longitudinal linear mixed effect models for gene counts and protein levels.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, anifrolumab modulated >2000 genes by week 24, with overlapping results at week 52, and 41 proteins by week 52. IFNAR1 blockade with anifrolumab downregulated multiple type I and II IFN-induced gene modules/pathways and type III IFN-λ protein levels, and impacted apoptosis-associated and neutrophil extracellular traps-(NET)osis-associated transcriptional pathways, innate cell activating chemokines and receptors, proinflammatory cytokines and B-cell activating cytokines. In silico deconvolution of RNA-seq data indicated an increase from baseline of mucosal-associated invariant and γδT cells and a decrease of monocytes following anifrolumab treatment.

DISCUSSION

Type I IFN blockade with anifrolumab modulated multiple inflammatory pathways downstream of type I IFN signalling, including apoptotic, innate and adaptive mechanisms that play key roles in SLE immunopathogenesis.

[Treatment of lupus nephritis]

Lupus nephritis remains the most frequent severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus, leading to chronic renal impairment in 20 to 25% of cases. Current treatment is based on the combined use of immunosuppressive treatment and targeted biotherapies to optimize the chances of promptly obtaining and maintaining a complete renal response over the long term. The author discusses these recent advances.

The long-term safety and tolerability of anifrolumab for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in Japan: TULIP-LTE subgroup analysis

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of anifrolumab 300 mg, alongside standard therapy, in patients from Japan with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the TULIP-LTE trial (NCT02794285).

METHODS

TULIP-LTE was a 3-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled long-term extension (LTE) of the TULIP trials. The primary safety outcome included serious adverse events (SAEs) and AEs of special interest (AESIs) during the LTE period. Exploratory efficacy outcomes included SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 K) scores and glucocorticoid use. We performed a post hoc subgroup analysis of patients who enrolled in Japan.

RESULTS

Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of SAEs during the LTE and follow-up for patients receiving anifrolumab 300 mg (n = 21) were 8.7 per 100 patient-years; AESIs included influenza (6.9) and herpes zoster (3.5). One of three patients receiving placebo had an SAE (13.9). One patient per group discontinued due to an AE. There were no deaths. During the TULIP + LTE period, patients receiving anifrolumab 300 mg (n = 24) had sustained reduction from baseline in mean SLEDAI-2 K scores and cumulative glucocorticoid dosage.

CONCLUSIONS

Anifrolumab 300 mg showed a favourable benefit-risk profile for the long-term treatment of adult patients with moderate to severe SLE from Japan, with safety, tolerability, and efficacy profiles consistent with the overall population.

Use of Anifrolumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus, and Other Autoimmune Dermatoses

Anifrolumab is an inhibitor of the type I interferon receptor subunit 1 (IFNAR1) recently approved for the management of moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In 2 clinical trials, it has proven effective to treat cutaneous signs. Although anifrolumab has not been indicated for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), multiple cases and case series (20 publications with a total of 78 patients) have shown good and rapid responses with this drug, both in subacute CLE and discoid lupus erythematosus, as well as in lupus panniculitis and perniosis. Two case reports of dermatomyositis have also experienced clinical improvement with anifrolumab. Clinical trials of this drug are ongoing for subacute CLE and discoid lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, and progressive vitiligo. Its most common adverse effects are respiratory infections and herpes zoster. Anifrolumab may be a well-tolerated alternative in the management of CLE.

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Anifrolumab in Moderate-to-Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease, which poses significant challenges due to its chronic nature and complex clinical manifestations. For patients with moderate-to-severe SLE, anifrolumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets the type 1 interferon receptor (IFNAR), has emerged as a cutting-edge treatment option that can reduce disease activity, prevent organ damage from the illness or side effects resulting from medications, and enhance the quality of life for those living with SLE. Consequently, this drug has received approval from major regulatory agencies. Anifrolumab's safety, effectiveness, and long-term results are assessed in this systematic review using information from clinical trials, real-world research, and retrospective analysis. In particular, clinical investigations, such as the MUSE Phase II and TULIP Phase III trials, showed that anifrolumab significantly improved important outcomes compared to placebo, including the SLE Responder Index, major clinical response, and disease activity ratings. During extended use, anifrolumab demonstrated significant sustained efficacy and a tolerable safety profile, with controllable side events mostly associated with viral infections. Moreover, subgroup analyses, demonstrating that Asian patients and individuals with a strong interferon gene profile are particularly responsive to anifrolumab, underscore the importance of customized treatment methods. Anifrolumab's safety and effectiveness were further validated by real-world data, particularly in patients who reached the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), where the drug decreased glucocorticoid consumption and disease activity. Overall, anifrolumab shows great promise as a treatment for moderate-to-severe SLE, providing significant efficacy together with a manageable safety profile. To fully explore its therapeutic potential and optimize therapy approaches for the management of SLE, further research is necessary, especially in lupus nephritis and other disease subsets.

Interferon subverts an AHR-JUN axis to promote CXCL13+ T cells in lupus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is prototypical autoimmune disease driven by pathological T cell-B cell interactions1,2. Expansion of T follicular helper (TFH) and T peripheral helper (TPH) cells, two T cell populations that provide help to B cells, is a prominent feature of SLE3,4. Human TFH and TPH cells characteristically produce high levels of the B cell chemoattractant CXCL13 (refs. 5,6), yet regulation of T cell CXCL13 production and the relationship between CXCL13+ T cells and other T cell states remains unclear. Here, we identify an imbalance in CD4+ T cell phenotypes in patients with SLE, with expansion of PD-1+/ICOS+ CXCL13+ T cells and reduction of CD96hi IL-22+ T cells. Using CRISPR screens, we identify the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) as a potent negative regulator of CXCL13 production by human CD4+ T cells. Transcriptomic, epigenetic and functional studies demonstrate that AHR coordinates with AP-1 family member JUN to prevent CXCL13+ TPH/TFH cell differentiation and promote an IL-22+ phenotype. Type I interferon, a pathogenic driver of SLE7, opposes AHR and JUN to promote T cell production of CXCL13. These results place CXCL13+ TPH/TFH cells on a polarization axis opposite from T helper 22 (TH22) cells and reveal AHR, JUN and interferon as key regulators of these divergent T cell states.

An update on clinical trials for cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) comprises dermatologic manifestations that may occur independently or with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Despite advancements in refining CLE classification, establishing precise subtype criteria remains challenging due to overlapping presentations and difficulty in distinguishing morphology. Current treatments encompass preventive measures, topical therapies, and systemic approaches. Hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids are the sole US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications for CLE, with numerous off-label treatments available. However, these treatments are often not covered by insurance, imposing a significant financial burden on patients. The exclusion of most CLE patients, particularly those without concurrent SLE, from trials designed for SLE has resulted in a lack of targeted treatments for CLE. To develop effective CLE treatments, validated outcome measures for tracking patient responsiveness are essential. The Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index is widely utilized for its reliability, validity, and ability to differentiate between skin activity and damage. In contrast, the FDA mandates the use of the Investigator's Global Assessment, a five-point Likert scale related to lesion characteristics, for skin-related therapeutic trials. It requires the disease to resolve or almost completely resolve to demonstrate improvement, which can be difficult when there is residual erythema or incomplete clearance that is meaningfully improved from a patient perspective. Various classes of skin lupus medications target diverse pathways, allowing tailored treatment based on the patient's lupus inflammatory profile, resulting in improved outcomes. Promising targeted therapeutic drugs include anifrolumab (anti-type 1 interferon), deucravacitinib (allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor), litifilimab (plasmacytoid dendritic cell-directed therapy), iberdomide (cereblon-targeting ligand), and belimumab (B-cell directed therapy). Despite the significant impact of CLE on quality of life, therapeutic options remain inadequate. While promising treatments for cutaneous lupus are emerging, it is crucial to underscore the urgency for skin-focused treatment outcomes and the implementation of validated measures to assess therapeutic effectiveness in clinical trials.

Unfavorable Outcomes Associated With Glucocorticoid Use in Current Standard-of-Care Management of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Canada

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to describe the administration of glucocorticoids (GCs) and characterize its association with organ damage in a longitudinal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cohort over a time period spanning the introduction of biologics in Canada.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted using data from a large SLE cohort in Canada, including adults without lupus nephritis or central nervous system lupus. Patients were observed from time of entry into the cohort to the last available clinic visit (up to December 31, 2020), with a minimum of 24 months of follow-up. Demographic and clinical characteristics, including average disease activity, treatment administration, and prevalence of organ damage, were examined. Organ damage was stratified by GC administration.

RESULTS

A total of 1,255 patients were included. The mean follow-up duration was 10.5 (SD 8.6) years. One hundred eighty-two (15%) patients had organ damage at baseline. More than 80% of patients were prescribed GCs over the follow-up period, almost all patients had long-term GC treatment, and only 5% of patients took any biologics. Organ damage was more frequent in patients with a higher average GC dose and greater years of GC exposure.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of patients with SLE, the majority of patients continue to rely on GC for SLE symptom management, with limited administration of biologics. GC administration was correlated with increased irreversible organ damage. Access to novel GC-sparing treatment options is critical to improve long-term outcomes for patients with SLE, especially given the continued reliance on GC despite the introduction of biologics.

Impressive resolution of refractory hypertrophic discoid lupus erythematosus with anifrolumab

Hypertrophic discoid lupus erythematosus is a rare variant of chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus and is often challenging to treat. A male in his early 60s presented with diffuse erythematous, crusty, pruritic plaques on his upper and lower extremities, face, upper back, dorsal aspect of the hands and chest. He also described prolonged morning stiffness, swelling of his fingers and wrists, oral sores and Raynaud's phenomenon. He was positive for antinuclear antibody and anti-SSA antibody and had low C3 and C4 proteins. The skin biopsy was consistent with hypertrophic discoid lupus erythematosus. He was diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus. Skin lesions were refractory to treatment with topical corticosteroids, topical acitretin, hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine or mycophenolate. Anifrolumab infusions were initiated with a near-complete resolution of cutaneous symptoms within 3 months.

IFN-I Score and Rare Genetic Variants in Children with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Introduction: Interferon I (IFN I) signaling hyperactivation is considered one of the most important pathogenetic mechanisms in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Early manifestation and more severe SLE courses in children suggest a stronger genetic influence in childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). Aim: To evaluate IFN-I score and SLE-associated genetic variants in cSLE. Material and Methods: 80 patients with cSLE were included in the study. IFN I-score was assessed by real-time PCR quantitation of 5 IFN I-regulated transcripts (IFI44L, IFI44, IFIT3, LY6E, MXA1) in 60 patients. Clinical exome sequencing (CES) was performed in 51 patients. Whole-exome sequencing was performed in 32 patients with negative results of CES. Results: 46/60 patients (77%) had elevated IFN-I scores. Leucopenia and skin involvement were associated with over-expression of IFI44 and IFI44L, while hypocomplementemia-with hyperactivation of IFIT3, LY6E, and MX1. No correlation of IFN-I score with disease activity was found. At least one rare genetic variant, potentially associated with SLE, was found in 29 (56.9%) patients. The frequency of any SLE-genetic variants in patients with increased IFN scores was 84%, in patients with normal IFN scores-33%, and in the group whose IFN score was not assessed was 65% (p = 0.040). The majority of genetic variants (74%) are functionally related to nucleic acid sensing and IFN-signaling. The highest frequency of genetic variants was observed in Sakha patients (9/14; 64.3%); three and two unrelated patients had identical variants in PTPN22 and TREX1 genes, respectively. Conclusions: More than half of patients with childhood-onset SLE have rare variants in SLE-associated genes. The IFN-I score could be considered a tool for the selection of patients for further genetic assessment in whom monogenic lupus is suspected.

Targeting Interferon Signalling in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Lessons Learned

The development of new medicines for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has not addressed unmet clinical need, with only three drugs receiving regulatory approval for SLE in the last 60 years, one of which was specifically licensed for lupus nephritis. In the last 20 years it has become clear that activation of type 1 interferons (IFN) is reproducibly detected in the majority of SLE patients, and the actions of IFN in the immune system and on target tissues is consistent with a pathogenic role in SLE. These findings led to considerable drug discovery activity, first with agents directly targeting IFN family cytokines, with results that were encouraging but underwhelming. In contrast, targeting the type I IFN receptor with the monoclonal antibody anifrolumab, thereby blocking all IFN family members, was effective in a phase II clinical trial. This led to a pair of phase III trials, one of which was negative and the other positive, reflecting the difficulty of obtaining outcomes from trials in this complex disease. Nonetheless, the balance of evidence resulted in approval of anifrolumab in multiple jurisdictions from 2021 onwards. Multiple approaches to targeting the type 1 IFN pathway have subsequently had positive phase II clinical trials, including antibodies targeting cells that produce IFN, and small molecules targeting the receptor kinase TYK2, required for IFN signalling. Despite multiple hurdles, it is clear that IFN targeting in SLE is here to stay. The story of IFN-targeting therapy in SLE has lessons for drug development overall in this disease.

New and emerging therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis treatment is still based on non-specific immune suppression despite the first biological therapy for the disease having been approved more than a decade ago. Intense basic and translational research has uncovered a multitude of pathways that are actively being evaluated as treatment targets in SLE and lupus nephritis, with two new medications receiving FDA approval in the last 3 years. Herein we provide an overview of targeted therapies for SLE including medications targeting the B lymphocyte compartment, intracellular signaling, co-stimulation, and finally the interferons and other cytokines.

Management of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic literature review informing the 2023 update of the EULAR recommendations

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the new evidence (2018-2022) for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to inform the 2023 update of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations.

METHODS

Systematic literature reviews were performed in the Medline and the Cochrane Library databases capturing publications from 1 January 2018 through 31 December 2022, according to the EULAR standardised operating procedures. The research questions focused on five different domains, namely the benefit/harm of SLE treatments, the benefits from the attainment of remission/low disease activity, the risk/benefit from treatment tapering/withdrawal, the management of SLE with antiphospholipid syndrome and the safety of immunisations against varicella zoster virus and SARS-CoV2 infection. A Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome framework was used to develop search strings for each research topic.

RESULTS

We identified 439 relevant articles, the majority being observational studies of low or moderate quality. High-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) documented the efficacy of the type 1 interferon receptor inhibitor, anifrolumab, in non-renal SLE, and belimumab and voclosporin, a novel calcineurin inhibitor, in lupus nephritis (LN), when compared with standard of care. For the treatment of specific organ manifestations outside LN, a lack of high-quality data was documented. Multiple observational studies confirmed the beneficial effects of attaining clinical remission or low disease activity, reducing the risk for multiple adverse outcomes. Two randomised trials with some concerns regarding risk of bias found higher rates of relapse in patients who discontinued glucocorticoids (GC) or immunosuppressants in SLE and LN, respectively, yet observational cohort studies suggest that treatment withdrawal might be feasible in a subset of patients.

CONCLUSION

Anifrolumab and belimumab achieve better disease control than standard of care in extrarenal SLE, while combination therapies with belimumab and voclosporin attained higher response rates in high-quality RCTs in LN. Remission and low disease activity are associated with favourable long-term outcomes. In patients achieving these targets, GC and immunosuppressive therapy may gradually be tapered. Cite Now.

Disease-modifying therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus for extrarenal manifestations

Our 2022 published working definition of disease modification in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was 'minimising disease activity with the fewest treatment-associated toxicities and slowing or preventing organ damage progression'. The objective of this review was to classify current SLE treatments according to the proposed non-renal disease modification criteria excluding toxicities. Based on a review of select clinical trial (n=32) and observational study (n=54) publications for 14 SLE medications across different therapeutic classes, and the authors' clinical experience, we evaluated disease modification potential as per the proposed framework at three time points. Specific criteria used to determine disease modification potential included a drug's capacity to reduce: (1) non-renal disease activity, (2) severe flares, (3) use of steroids/immunosuppressants and (4) organ damage accrual. Criteria 1-3 were assessed at 1 year and 2-5 years and, when positive, were considered evidence for disease modification potential; criterion 4 was used to confirm disease modification at >5 years. Each treatment received one of four mutually exclusive designations at each time point: (a) criterion met, (b) indications of criterion met despite insufficient evidence in the literature, (c) inconclusive and (d) no available supportive data. This review excludes an assessment of potential toxicities. Eight of the 14 SLE treatments met ≥1 disease modification criteria up to year 5. Hydroxychloroquine improved overall survival at >5 years, suggesting long-term disease modification, but no data on specific organ systems were reported. Belimumab was the only treatment to meet all criteria. Belimumab and hydroxychloroquine met disease modification definitions across three time points. Evidence for other SLE therapies was incomplete, particularly at >5 years. Future studies are warranted for other treatments to meet the disease modification criteria. We discuss challenges to classification and possible updates to our published criteria.

Uncoupling interferons and the interferon signature explains clinical and transcriptional subsets in SLE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) displays a hallmark interferon (IFN) signature. Yet, clinical trials targeting type I IFN (IFN-I) have shown variable efficacy, and blocking IFN-II failed to treat SLE. Here, we show that IFN type levels in SLE vary significantly across clinical and transcriptional endotypes. Whereas skin involvement correlated with IFN-I alone, systemic features like nephritis associated with co-elevation of IFN-I, IFN-II, and IFN-III, indicating additive IFN effects in severe SLE. Notably, while high IFN-II/-III levels without IFN-I had a limited effect on disease activity, IFN-II was linked to IFN-I-independent transcriptional profiles (e.g., OXPHOS and CD8+GZMH+ cells), and IFN-III enhanced IFN-induced gene expression when co-elevated with IFN-I. Moreover, dysregulated IFNs do not explain the IFN signature in 64% of patients or clinical manifestations including cytopenia, serositis, and anti-phospholipid syndrome, implying IFN-independent endotypes in SLE. This study sheds light on mechanisms underlying SLE heterogeneity and the variable response to IFN-targeted therapies in clinical trials.

Unraveling transcriptomic signatures and dysregulated pathways in systemic lupus erythematosus across disease states

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to elucidate the transcriptomic signatures and dysregulated pathways in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), with a particular focus on those persisting during disease remission.

METHODS

We conducted bulk RNA-sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from a well-defined cohort comprising 26 remission patients meeting the Low Lupus Disease Activity State (LLDAS) criteria, 76 patients experiencing disease flares, and 15 healthy controls. To elucidate immune signature changes associated with varying disease states, we performed extensive analyses, including the identification of differentially expressed genes and pathways, as well as the construction of protein-protein interaction networks.

RESULTS

Several transcriptomic features recovered during remission compared to the active disease state, including down-regulation of plasma and cell cycle signatures, as well as up-regulation of lymphocytes. However, specific innate immune response signatures, such as the interferon (IFN) signature, and gene modules involved in chromatin structure modification, persisted across different disease states. Drug repurposing analysis revealed certain drug classes that can target these persistent signatures, potentially preventing disease relapse.

CONCLUSION

Our comprehensive transcriptomic study revealed gene expression signatures for SLE in both active and remission states. The discovery of gene expression modules persisting in the remission stage may shed light on the underlying mechanisms of vulnerability to relapse in these patients, providing valuable insights for their treatment.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Review

Importance

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation and immune-mediated injury to multiple organ systems, including the mucocutaneous, musculoskeletal, hematologic, and kidney systems. Approximately 3.4 million people worldwide have received a diagnosis of SLE.

Observations

Approximately 90% of people with SLE are female. Although there are no uniformly accepted diagnostic criteria for SLE, the 2019 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (formerly the European League Against Rheumatism)/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria developed for scientific study are an estimated 96.1% sensitive and 93.4% specific for SLE. These classification criteria include both clinical factors, such as fever, cytopenia, rash, arthritis, and proteinuria, which may be indicative of lupus nephritis; and immunologic measures, such as SLE-specific autoantibodies and low complement levels. Approximately 40% of people with SLE develop lupus nephritis, and an estimated 10% of people with lupus nephritis develop end-stage kidney disease after 10 years. The primary goal of treatment is to achieve disease remission or quiescence, defined by minimal symptoms, low levels of autoimmune inflammatory markers, and minimal systemic glucocorticoid requirement while the patient is treated with maintenance doses of immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive medications. Treatment goals include reducing disease exacerbations, hospitalizations, and organ damage due to the disease or treatment toxicity. Hydroxychloroquine is standard of care for SLE and has been associated with a significant reduction in mortality. Treatments in addition to hydroxychloroquine are individualized, with immunosuppressive agents, such as azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide, typically used for treating moderate to severe disease. Three SLE medications were recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration: belimumab (for active SLE in 2011 and for lupus nephritis in 2020), voclosporin (for lupus nephritis), and anifrolumab (for active SLE).

Conclusions and Relevance

Systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with immune-mediated damage to multiple organs and increased mortality. Hydroxychloroquine is first-line therapy and reduces disease activity, morbidity, and mortality. When needed, additional immunosuppressive and biologic therapies include azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, belimumab, voclosporin, and anifrolumab.

TYK2: an emerging therapeutic target in rheumatic disease

Tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) is a member of the JAK kinase family of intracellular signalling molecules. By participating in signalling pathways downstream of type I interferons, IL-12, IL-23 and IL-10, TYK2 elicits a distinct set of immune events to JAK1, JAK2 and JAK3. TYK2 polymorphisms have been associated with susceptibility to various rheumatic diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus and dermatomyositis. In vitro and animal studies substantiate these findings, highlighting a role for TYK2 in diseases currently managed by antagonists of cytokines that signal through TYK2. Various inhibitors of TYK2 have now been studied in human disease, and one of these inhibitors, deucravacitinib, has now been approved for the treatment of psoriasis. Phase II trials of deucravacitinib have also reported positive results in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, with a preliminary safety profile that seems to differ from that of the JAK1, JAK2 and JAK3 inhibitors. Two other inhibitors of TYK2, brepocitinib and ropsacitinib, are also in earlier stages of clinical trials. Overall, TYK2 inhibitors hold promise for the treatment of a distinct spectrum of autoimmune diseases and could potentially have a safety profile that differs from other JAK inhibitors.

Advances in the pharmacological management of systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

Despite setbacks in clinical trials for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), three drugs have been approved for SLE and lupus nephritis (LN) treatment in the past decade. Several ongoing clinical trials, some viewed optimistically by the scientific community, underscore the evolving landscape. Emerging clinical data have established specific therapeutic targets in routine clinical practice for treating SLE, aiming to improve long-term outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

Research related to treatment of SLE and LN is discussed, focusing on randomized clinical trials during the last 5 years and recommendations for the management of SLE published by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR), American College of Rheumatology (ACR), Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology (APLAR), and Pan-American League of Associations of Rheumatology (PANLAR).

EXPERT OPINION

The landscape of SLE and LN treatments is evolving, as new drugs and combination treatment approaches redefine the traditional concepts of induction and maintenance treatment phases. As the therapeutic armamentarium in SLE continues to expand, the research focus is shifting from the imperative for new therapies to advancing our understanding of optimal treatment selection for individual patients, steering toward precision medicine strategies.

Microsimulation model of the cost-effectiveness of anifrolumab compared to belimumab in the United Arab Emirates

INTRODUCTION

SLE imposes a significant morbidity and mortality as well as a substantial burden on the healthcare system. The model aimed to measure the cost-effectiveness of anifrolumab implementation against belimumab as an add-on-therapy to the standard of care (SoC) over a lifetime horizon for Emirati patients.

METHODOLOGY

A microsimulation model was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of anifrolumab against belimumab (IV/SC) as an add-on therapy to SoC in a hypothetical cohort of adult Emirati patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) over a lifetime horizon. The clinical data was captured from published clinical trials as; TULIP-1, TULIP-2, BLISS-52, BLISS-76 and BLISS-SC. Health utility scores were constructed according to a linear regression model from the pooled data of the two TULIP Phase III trials of anifrolumab. Our model captures direct SLE-related medical costs from the Dubai Health Authority. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess model uncertainty.

RESULTS

Using BICLA as a response criterion in the Johns Hopkins cohort, anifrolumab was found to be more effective than belimumab (IV/SC; the incremental discounted QALY of anifrolumab against belimumab was 0.42). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of anifrolumab against belimumab IV and belimumab SC were AED 466,371 ($209,135) and AED 252,612 ($113,279), respectively, these ICERs are below the cost-effectiveness threshold in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) (three times gross domestic product capita; AED 592,278). In the Toronto lupus cohort, the ICER of anifrolumab against belimumab IV and belimumab SC were AED 491,403 ($220,360) and AED 276,642 ($124,055), respectively (anifrolumab was a cost-effective option vs. belimumab IV and belimumab SC).

CONCLUSION

The addition of anifrolumab to SoC is a cost-effective option versus belimumab for the treatment of adult patients with active, autoantibody-positive SLE, despite being allocated to SoC. Cost-effectiveness was demonstrated by a reduction in complications and organ damage, which reflected costs and outcomes.

SLE criteria are by necessity still based on clinical (and immunological) criteria items

INTRODUCTION

The 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) rely on clinical and routine immunological items. The criteria have anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) as an obligatory entry criterion; items are weighted and ordered in domains. While demonstrating good sensitivity and specificity, the lack of a more molecular approach to some came as a disappointment.

AREAS COVERED

Based on a non-systematic literature search, this review covers items investigated in the EULAR/ACR classification criteria project, but not included in the set of criteria. It demonstrates data on the importance of the criteria and analyses implications of multiomics studies started around the same time as the criteria project. We also discuss data on the type-I interferon signature and on other cytokines, as well as on complement proteins and their split products. The final part deals with the variability in disease and the apparently random pattern of autoantibodies and organ manifestations in individual patients.

EXPERT OPINION

We believe that the EULAR/ACR criteria are a relevant step toward the right direction. A more uniform molecular approach will not be feasible as long as the molecular mechanisms underlying the tendency toward producing multiple autoantibodies are not better understood.

Type 1 interferons: A target for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs)

The improved understanding of the molecular basis of innate immunity have led to the identification of type I interferons (IFNs), particularly IFN-α, as central mediators in the pathogenesis of several Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis, inflammatory myositis and Sjögren's syndrome. Here, we review the main data regarding the opportunity to target type I IFNs for the treatment of IMIDs. Type I IFNs and their downstream pathways can be targeted pharmacologically in several manners. One approach is to use monoclonal antibodies against IFNs or the IFN-receptors (IFNARs, such as with anifrolumab). The downstream signaling pathways of type I IFNs also contain several targets of interest in IMIDs, such as JAK1 and Tyk2. Of these, anifrolumab is licensed and JAK1/Tyk2 inhibitors are in phase III trials in SLE. Targeting IFN-Is for the treatment of SLE is already a reality and in the near future may prove useful in other IMIDs. IFN assays will find a role in routine clinical practice for the care of IMIDs as further validation work is completed and a greater range of targeted therapies becomes available.

Statistical and Scientific Considerations Concerning the Interpretation, Replicability, and Transportability of Research Findings

To advance scientific understanding of disease processes and related intervention effects, study results should be free from bias and replicable. More broadly, investigators seek results that are transportable, that is, applicable to a perceived study population as well as in other environments and populations. We review fundamental statistical issues that arise in the analysis of observational data from disease cohorts and other sources and discuss how these issues affect the transportability and replicability of research results. Much of the literature focuses on estimating average exposure or intervention effects at the population level, but we argue for more nuanced analyses of conditional effects that reflect the complexity of disease processes.

Model-based meta-analysis using latent variable modeling to set benchmarks for new treatments of systemic lupus erythematosus

Several investigational agents are under evaluation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) clinical trials but quantitative frameworks to enable comparison of their efficacy to reference benchmark treatments are lacking. To benchmark SLE treatment effects and identify clinically important covariates, we developed a model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) within a latent variable model framework for efficacy end points and SLE composite end point scores (BILAG-based Composite Lupus Assessment and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index) using aggregate-level data on approved and investigational therapeutics. SLE trials were searched using PubMed and www.clinicaltrials.gov for treatment name, SLE and clinical trial as search criteria that resulted in four data structures: (1) study and investigational agent, (2) dose and regimen, (3) baseline descriptors, and (4) outcomes. The final dataset consisted of 25 studies and 81 treatment arms evaluating 16 different agents. A previously developed (K Goteti et al. 2022) SLE latent variable model of data from placebo arms (placebo + standard of care treatments) was used to describe aggregate SLE end points over time for the various SLE placebo and treatment arms in a Bayesian MBMA framework. Continuous dose-effect relationships using a maximum effect model were included for anifrolumab, belimumab, CC-220 (iberdomide), epratuzumab, lulizumab pegol, and sifalimumab, whereas the remaining treatments were modeled as discrete dose effects. The final MBMA model was then used to benchmark these compounds with respect to the maximal efficacy on the latent variable compared to the placebo. This MBMA illustrates the application of latent variable models in understanding the trajectories of composite end points in chronic diseases and should enable model-informed development of new investigational agents in SLE.

Fragility of randomised controlled trials for systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis therapies

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the robustness of phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for SLE and lupus nephritis (LN) using the fragility index (FI), the reverse FI (RFI) and the fragility quotient (FQ).

METHODS

We searched for phase III RCTs that included patients with active SLE or LN. Data on primary endpoints, total participants and the number of events for each arm were obtained. We calculated the FI score for RCTs with statistically significant results (number of patients required to change from event to non-event to make the study lose statistical significance), the RFI for RCTs without statistically significant results (number of patients required to change from non-event to event to make study gain statistical significance) and the FQ score for both (FI or RFI score divided by the sample size).

RESULTS

We evaluated 20 RCTs (16 SLE, four LN). The mean FI/RFI score was 13.6 (SD 6.6). There were nine RCTs with statistically significant results (seven SLE, two LN), and the mean FI score was 10.2 (SD 6.2). The lowest FI was for the ILLUMINATE-2 trial (FI=2), and the highest FI was for the BLISS-52 trial (FI=17).Twelve studies had non-statistically significant results (10 SLE, two LN) with a mean RFI score of 15.6 (SD 6.1). The lowest RFI was for the ILLUMINATE-1 trial (RFI=4), and the highest RFI was for the TULIP-1 trial (RFI=27). The lowest FQ scores were found in the ILLUMINATE trials and the highest in the Rituximab trials (EXPLORER and LUNAR), meaning that the last ones were the most robust results after accounting for sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence of therapies for patients with SLE and LN is derived mostly from fragile RCTs. Clinicians and trialists must be aware of the fragility of these RCTs for clinical decision-making and designing trials for novel therapeutics.

EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: 2023 update

OBJECTIVES

To update the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on emerging new evidence.

METHODS

An international Task Force formed the questions for the systematic literature reviews (January 2018-December 2022), followed by formulation and finalisation of the statements after a series of meetings. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned, and participants finally provided their level of agreement with each item.

RESULTS

The Task Force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 13 recommendations, concerning the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), glucocorticoids (GC), immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) (including methotrexate, mycophenolate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide (CYC)), calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, voclosporin) and biologics (belimumab, anifrolumab, rituximab). Advice is also provided on treatment strategies and targets of therapy, assessment of response, combination and sequential therapies, and tapering of therapy. HCQ is recommended for all patients with lupus at a target dose 5 mg/kg real body weight/day, considering the individual's risk for flares and retinal toxicity. GC are used as 'bridging therapy' during periods of disease activity; for maintenance treatment, they should be minimised to equal or less than 5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) and, when possible, withdrawn. Prompt initiation of ISDs (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) and/or biological agents (anifrolumab, belimumab) should be considered to control the disease and facilitate GC tapering/discontinuation. CYC and rituximab should be considered in organ-threatening and refractory disease, respectively. For active lupus nephritis, GC, mycophenolate or low-dose intravenous CYC are recommended as anchor drugs, and add-on therapy with belimumab or CNIs (voclosporin or tacrolimus) should be considered. Updated specific recommendations are also provided for cutaneous, neuropsychiatric and haematological disease, SLE-associated antiphospholipid syndrome, kidney protection, as well as preventative measures for infections, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSION

The updated recommendations provide consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence and expert opinion.

When should targeted therapies be used in the treatment of lupus nephritis: Early in the disease course or in refractory patients?

Although the prognosis of lupus nephritis (LN) has improved over the last few decades, 5-20% of patients still progress to kidney failure. Hence, there is an unmet need to improve the management of LN. Two novel drugs, belimumab and voclosporin, have been recently approved for LN and obinutuzumab is in the late stage of development. In randomised controlled trials (RCTs), all these drugs, added to the standard-of-care, were more effective than standard-of-care alone in achieving renal response. Now the question is: should these new drugs be used early in the disease course or just in refractory patients? The main reasons supporting the early use are based on the RCTs that demonstrated benefits when combinatory regimen was initiated early in incident and relapsing patients leading to a higher proportion of patients to achieve renal response, hence reducing nephron loss and the risk of kidney failure. The main reasons supporting the use of the combinatory regimens primarily in relapsing/refractory patients acknowledge that many patients responded well even without add-on medications, allowing a more economic use of innovative and costly drugs. However, good predictors of renal response to standard-of-care are lacking and, thus, the decision of adding new treatments early or just in refractory or relapsing patients has to consider drug access, risks of over or undertreatment, and preservation of kidney function in high-risk individuals.

The development of litifilimab (BIIB 059) for cutaneous and systemic lupus erythematosus

This review describes the litifilimab (BIIB 059) development program to date for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), major producers of type I interferons (IFN-I), play a key role in SLE pathogenesis. Litifilimab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, binds to BDCA2, a protein uniquely expressed on pDCs. The consequence of BDCA2 ligation is the inhibition of IFN-I as well as IFN-III, cytokine and chemokine production. Phase I and II LILAC trial parts A and B achieved primary end points in SLE and CLE patients, confirming the importance of pDCs and IFN-I in SLE and CLE. Litifilimab is currently being evaluated in phase III trials in both SLE and CLE.

Anifrolumab: first biologic approved in the EU not restricted to patients with a high degree of disease activity for the treatment of moderate to severe systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

Type 1 interferons (IFNs) play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and various type I IFNs targeting therapeutic approaches have been developed. Anifrolumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds to the subunit 1 of the type I IFN receptor, has acquired considerable interest and has entered different clinical human trials willing to evaluate its efficacy and safety.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the data obtained in phases 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials of anifrolumab for SLE patients. A focus is made on data of clinical efficacy and safety obtained in MUSE, TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials.

EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY

Anifrolumab is a promising therapeutic option for patients with SLE, currently authorized for moderate-to-severe SLE. Extensive real-world use is now going to generate data required to gain experience on the type of patients who benefit the most from the drug, and the exact positioning of anifrolumab in the therapeutic plan.

Burden of systemic lupus erythematosus in clinical practice: baseline data from the SLE Prospective Observational Cohort Study (SPOCS) by interferon gene signature

OBJECTIVE

The longitudinal Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Prospective Observational Cohort Study (SPOCS) aims to assess SLE disease course overall and according to type I interferon 4 gene signature (IFNGS). Here, we describe SPOCS patient characteristics by IFNGS and baseline disease activity.

METHODS

SPOCS (NCT03189875) is an international study of patients with SLE according to Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. Enrolled patients from 135 centres in 8 countries were followed biannually for ≤3 years from June 2017 to November 2022. Baseline demographics, disease characteristics, organ system involvement/damage and flares were analysed descriptively according to SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 score (SLEDAI-2K <10/≥10) and IFNGS status (high/low).

RESULTS

The study population (n=823) was 93.2% female, with mean (SD) age 45.3 (13.9) years and 11.1 (9.2) years since diagnosis; 52.4% had baseline SLICC/ACR Damage Index score ≥1. Patients with SLEDAI-2K scores ≥10 (241 of 584, 41.3%) vs <10 were younger (mean 42.8 (13.7) vs 46.6 (14.2) years; nominal p=0.001), had shorter SLE duration (10.4 (8.6) vs 12.4 (9.6) years; nominal p=0.012) and more severe flares (12.9% vs 5.3%; nominal p=0.001). IFNGS-high patients (522 of 739, 70.6%) were younger than IFNGS-low patients at first SLE manifestation (30.0 (12.7) vs 36.8 (14.6) years; nominal p<0.001). Proportions of IFNGS-high patients differed according to race (nominal p<0.001), with higher proportions among Asian (83.3%) and black (86.5%) versus white patients (63.5%). Greater proportions of IFNGS-high versus IFNGS-low patients had haematological (12.6% vs 4.1%), immunological (74.4% vs 45.6%) or dermal (69.7% vs 62.2%) involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified key characteristics of patients with high disease activity and/or elevated type I IFN signalling, populations with SLE with high unmet needs. Baseline SLEDAI-2K ≥10 was associated with shorter disease duration and more severe flares. IFNGS-high patients were younger at diagnosis and had distinct patterns of organ involvement, compared with IFNGS-low patients.

Management of systemic lupus erythematosus: A new scenario

The introduction of targeted biological agents in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has created a momentum for improving overall disease management and patients' prognosis. To achieve this, a comprehensive strategy is required spanning the entire patient journey from diagnosis to prevention and management of late complications and comorbidities. In this review, we focus on four aspects that are closely linked to SLE prognosis, namely early disease recognition and treatment initiation, reduction of the cumulative glucocorticoid exposure, attainment of well-defined targets of remission and low disease activity, prevention of flares and, kidney-protective strategies with non-immune-directed agents. We review the recent literature related to these topics in conjunction with the existing treatment recommendations, highlighting areas of uncertainty and providing guidance towards facilitating the care of SLE patients.

Obexelimab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With Exploration of Response Based on Gene Pathway Co-Expression Patterns: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial

OBJECTIVE

Obexelimab is an investigational, bifunctional, noncytolytic monoclonal antibody that binds CD19 and FcyRIIb to inhibit B cells, plasmablasts, and plasma cells. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of obexelimab in the treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

During screening, patients with active, non-organ-threatening SLE received corticosteroid injections to ameliorate symptoms while immunosuppressants were withdrawn (≤10 mg/day prednisone equivalent and ≤400 mg/day hydroxychloroquine allowed). Patients with improved disease activity were randomized 1:1 to obexelimab 5 mg/kg intravenously or placebo once every 2 weeks until week 32 or loss of improvement (LOI).

RESULTS

In this study, 104 patients were randomized. Analysis of the primary endpoint, proportion of patients reaching week 32 without LOI, used an efficacy-evaluable (EE) population defined as patients who completed the study or withdrew for flare or treatment-related toxicity. This endpoint did not reach statistical significance: 21 of 50 obexelimab-treated patients (42.0%) versus 12 of 42 patients (28.6%) treated with a placebo (P = 0.183). Time to LOI was increased in obexelimab-treated patients versus patients treated with a placebo in the EE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, P = 0.025) and intention-to-treat (HR 0.59, P = 0.062) populations. In obexelimab-treated patients, B cells decreased approximately 50%, and trough concentration and inclusion in baseline gene expression clusters with high B cell pathway modules were associated with increased time to LOI. Obexelimab was associated with infusion reactions but was generally safe and well-tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Although the primary endpoint was not reached, secondary analysis showed time to LOI was significantly increased in obexelimab-treated patients, and analysis of patient subsets defined by gene expression patterns at baseline suggests a responding subpopulation.

Emerging immunotherapeutic strategies for cutaneous lupus erythematosus: an overview of recent phase 2 and 3 clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune disease that is clinically heterogenous and may occur with or without the presence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). While existing on a spectrum, CLE and SLE present differences in their underlying pathogenesis and therapeutic responses. No new therapies have been approved in recent decades by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for CLE, although frequently refractory to conventional therapies. There is an unmet need to develop effective drugs for CLE as it significantly impacts patients' quality of life and may leave irreversible disfiguring damage.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an update on the latest phase 2 and 3 clinical trials performed in CLE or SLE using skin-specific outcome measures. Emergent therapies are presented alongside their mechanism of action as recent translational studies have permitted identification of critical targets among immune cells and/or pathways involved in CLE.

EXPERT OPINION

While the recent literature has few trials for CLE, drugs targeting type I interferon, its downstream signaling and plasmacytoid dendritic cells have shown promising results. Further research is required to develop long-awaited effective therapies, and this review highlights the importance of implementing trials dedicated to CLE to fill the current gap in CLE therapeutics.

Immunotherapeutic approaches for systemic lupus erythematosus: early overview and future potential

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease. Current SLE therapies include immunosuppressants, antimalarial drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and corticosteroids, but these treatments can cause substantial toxicities to organs and may not be effective for all patients. In recent years, significant progress has been made in the treatment of SLE using immunotherapy, including Benlysta and Saphnelo. These advances in immunotherapy hold promise for SLE patients, providing new therapeutic options that may offer better clinical benefit and effectiveness. Simultaneously, several new biological therapies focusing on cytokines, peptides, targeted antibodies, and cell-based approaches are under clinical evaluation and have shown immense potential for the treatment of SLE. However, the complexity of SLE immunopathogenesis and disease heterogeneity present significant challenges in the development of effective immunological therapies. This review aims to discuss past experiences and understanding of diverse immunological targeting therapies for SLE and highlight future perspectives for the development of novel immunological therapies.

Targeting DORIS Remission and LLDAS in SLE: A Review

Remission is the established therapeutic goal for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is currently defined by the widely adopted Definition Of Remission In SLE (DORIS) criteria. Attainment of remission is rare in the clinical setting, thus an alternative, pragmatic treatment target of low disease activity, as defined by the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), provides a less stringent and more attainable treatment goal for a wider proportion of patients compared with DORIS remission. Randomized controlled trials and real-world analyses have confirmed the positive clinical benefits of achieving either DORIS remission or LLDAS. The treat-to-target (T2T) approach utilizes practical clinical targets to proactively tailor individual treatment regimens. Studies in other chronic inflammatory diseases using the T2T approach demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes and quality-of-life measures compared with established standard of care. However, such trials have not yet been performed in patients with SLE. Here we review the evolution of DORIS remission and LLDAS definitions and the evidence supporting the positive clinical outcomes following DORIS remission or LLDAS attainment, before discussing considerations for implementation of these outcome measures as potential T2T objectives. Adoption of DORIS remission and LLDAS treatment goals may result in favorable patient outcomes compared with established standard of care for patients with SLE.

Musculoskeletal manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus

MSK is the most common and impactful symptom of lupus at a population level. It has a variety of different presentations, but joint swelling is often not present despite imaging-proven synovitis. Imaging with US and MRI has been shown to improve detection of inflammation and identify treatment-responsive patients. In contrast, the SLEDAI shows poor sensitivity, specificity, and responsiveness. While BILAG and SLE-DAS are superior, they are still less accurate than imaging. These issues may explain why the evidence for conventional and biologic therapies for MSK lupus is complex. In clinical practice, physicians must take care not to underestimate MSK inflammation and consider using imaging. Future research should investigate new therapeutic targets specifically for synovitis and more sensitive outcome measures and trials to evaluate them.

Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: new therapeutic options

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune inflammatory disease of unknown cause, with heterogeneity in its clinical presentation, as well as variability in its clinical course and prognosis. The current goal of treatment is to achieve disease remission or a state of low activity, and thereby improve the patient's quality of life. Biological therapy in lupus, unlike other entities, although it has not been fully established, in recent years it has burst onto the scene with important therapeutic novelties. This review aims to update the therapeutic tools for the treatment of SLE focusing on the new molecules that have achieved the objectives of their clinical trials.