Measuring Antibiotic Appropriateness for Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Home Residents

Evaluating Antimicrobial Utilisation in 20 Korean Long-Term Care Hospitals: A Call to Action for Antimicrobial Stewardship

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of hospital-specific antimicrobial use is necessary for successful national antimicrobial stewardship. This study aimed to identify antimicrobial use in long-term care hospitals (LCHs) in Korea.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre retrospective study to evaluate the prescription patterns and appropriateness of antimicrobials in 20 LCHs in Korea. The medical record data of hospitalised patients who were newly prescribed antimicrobials at each hospital were collected manually between 10 July and 31 October 2023 to evaluate the appropriateness of antimicrobial use.

RESULTS

The prevalence of antimicrobial prescriptions was 8.9% (365/4,086) and 10.3% (402/3,892) on July 12, 2023 and October 18, 2023, respectively. A total of 885 antimicrobials were prescribed to 740 patients. Among the antimicrobials, third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins (31.9%) represented the most prescribed antimicrobial class. A large majority of antimicrobials (855/885, 96.6%) were prescribed for the treatment of infectious diseases; however, only 37.7% (322/855) of antimicrobials were appropriately prescribed for infections. The route of administration, dosage, and prescribed antimicrobial were appropriate in 99.6% (852/855), 56.1% (480/855), and 62.0% (530/855) of cases, respectively. In total, 35.2% (252/715) of patients were appropriately prescribed antimicrobials. The diagnosis of infectious diseases was appropriate for 52.9% (472/892) of the cases. Of the 5, 15, and 10 antimicrobials used for surgical site infection prophylaxis, medical prophylaxis, and other purposes, respectively, none were appropriately used.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of antimicrobials used appropriately is low in Korean LCHs. These data highlight the importance of establishing antimicrobial stewardship in LCHs.

Urinary Tract Infection Guideline Adherence in a Dutch Sentinel Nursing Home Surveillance Network

OBJECTIVES

To investigate guideline adherence 3 years after the introduction of a national guideline on urinary tract infections (UTIs) in frail older adults. Appropriate use of urine dipstick tests, treatment decisions, and antibiotic drug choices in residents with (suspected) UTIs without a catheter were examined.

DESIGN

Observational prospective study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Nineteen nursing homes participating in a Dutch Sentinel Nursing Home Surveillance Network.

METHODS

As of September 2021, for a 3-month period, medical practitioners recorded additional clinical information in the electronic health record in case of a (suspected) UTI. Based on this information, adherence to guideline recommendations was assessed. Nonadherence was classified into 2 categories: (1) "intentional nonadherence" as reported by practitioners and (2) "nonadherence otherwise" applied to all other cases where the recorded information was discordant with the guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

A total of 532 cases of (suspected) UTIs from 469 residents were analyzed. In 455 cases (86%), dipsticks were used. For the 231 cases where clinical signs and symptoms already indicated no UTI treatment according to the guideline, a dipstick was still inappropriately ordered in 196 cases (85%). The decision to prescribe or withhold antibiotics was in 69% of the cases adherent, in 6% intentionally nonadherent, and in 25% nonadherent otherwise. The type of prescribed antibiotic was adherent to the recommended antibiotics for cystitis in 88% and for UTIs with signs of tissue invasion in 48%. Overall, for 40% of suspected UTIs, adherence to all relevant recommendations could be established, and in 9% practitioners reported intentional nonadherence to the guideline.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

There is considerable room for improvement in all clinical stages of managing a suspected UTI in Dutch nursing homes, particularly with regard to the importance of patient's clinical signs and symptoms for appropriate dipstick use and antibiotic UTI treatments.

Assessing the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Prescribing in the Community Setting: A Scoping Review

Background

This scoping review examined the concept and scope of appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing in the community setting and how it has been measured.

Methods

Utilizing the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology, we appraised peer-reviewed articles and unpublished studies, focusing on the US, UK, Canada, and Australia, with no limit to date.

Results

Four basic components of antimicrobial prescribing to be evaluated during assessment of antimicrobial appropriateness in the community setting were identified: diagnosis for infection or indication for antimicrobial therapy, choice of antimicrobial therapy, dosing, and duration of therapy. The benchmark for definition of appropriateness is crucial in assessing antimicrobial prescribing appropriateness. The use of recommended guidelines as a benchmark is the standard for appropriate antimicrobial therapy, and when necessary, susceptibility testing should be explored.

Conclusions

Studies evaluating the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing should assess these components of antimicrobial prescribing, and this should be clearly stated in the aim and objectives of the study.

A Process Evaluation of an Antibiotic Stewardship Intervention for Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Homes

OBJECTIVES

To assess the internal and external validity of a cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) evaluating a decision tool with supportive interventions for the empirical treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in nursing homes (NHs), and to identify facilitators and barriers in implementing this antibiotic stewardship intervention.

DESIGN

Mixed-methods process evaluation study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Physicians, nursing staff, client council members, and residents of Dutch NHs.

METHODS

We used cRCT data of the ANNA study (Antibiotic Prescribing and Non-prescribing in Nursing Home Residents With Signs and Symptoms Ascribed to Urinary Tract Infection). In addition, we sent out an online evaluation questionnaire, conducted semistructured interviews with physicians and nursing staff, and consulted client council members.

RESULTS

Internal validity was lowered: control group physicians participated in several non-study-related activities regarding UTI. External validity was good: almost all intervention components had a high fidelity (52%-74%) and were perceived as relevant (physicians: 7.2-8.6 of 10, nursing staff: 6.5-8.5 of 10) and feasible (physicians: 7.5 of 10, nursing staff 6.4 of 10), with feasibility for residents with dementia and urine incontinence needing attention. The most common reason for deviating from the advice generated by the decision tool was an unclear illness presentation. Identified facilitators to implementation were confidence in the intervention, repeated intervention encounter, and having "champions" in the NH. Barriers were limited involvement of nursing staff, unstable nursing teams, residents' and representatives' belief that antibiotics should be prescribed, and a low antibiotic prescribing threshold within the NH culture.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Lowered internal validity may have reduced the study effect. Attention should be paid to the feasibility of the intervention in residents with dementia and urinary incontinence. Improvement opportunities for implementation were higher nursing staff involvement and repeated intervention offering.

Determining the Appropriateness of Initiating Antibiotic Therapy in Nursing Home Residents

One approach for improving antibiotic prescribing in nursing homes is evaluating appropriateness of initiating antibiotic therapy. However, determining appropriateness has been a challenge. To investigate this problem literature review identified studies evaluating appropriateness of initiating antibiotic therapy in nursing homes. Two criteria were used most often to assess appropriateness: infection surveillance criterion or criteria specifically designed to assist clinicians for prescribing antibiotics. Development of these criteria and results of studies using these criteria were reviewed. There was considerable variability in percentage appropriateness of initiating therapy for these criteria, variation in the methodology for conducting these studies, and limitations of the criteria. The main limitation of infection surveillance criteria is that they are specifically designed to be highly specific but this results in low sensitivity. Thus, surveillance criteria should not be used for assessing appropriateness of antibiotic therapy. The other criterion is limited because it uses only localizing signs and symptoms of infection and these findings may not be documented in the medical record when evaluating appropriateness retrospectively. Several alternative methods to assess appropriateness were identified but evaluation of these methods have not been published. Several changes are suggested to improve the evaluation of the appropriateness of initiating antibiotic therapy in nursing home residents: confirmation by the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services that surveillance definitions should not be used to evaluate appropriateness; develop and validate definitions of clinical infections in residents; standardize methods to evaluate appropriateness prospectively by the facility antimicrobial stewardship program; educate clinicians and nursing staff regarding the criteria for assessing appropriateness; and investigate the influence of provider-, resident-, family-, and facility-level factors on antibiotic use in nursing home residents.

A Multifaceted Intervention and Its Effects on Antibiotic Usage in Norwegian Nursing Homes

We explored the impact of an antibiotic quality improvement intervention across 33 nursing homes (NHs) in one Norwegian county, compared against four control counties. This 12-month multifaceted intervention consisted of three physical conferences, including educational sessions, workshops, antibiotic feedback reports, and academic detailing sessions. We provided clinical guiding checklists to participating NHs. Pharmacy sales data served as a measure of systemic antibiotic use. The primary outcome was a change in antibiotic use in DDD/100 BD from the baseline through the intervention, assessed using linear mixed models to identify changes in antibiotic use. Total antibiotic use decreased by 15.8%, from 8.68 to 7.31 DDD/100BD (model-based estimated change (MBEC): -1.37, 95% CI: -2.35 to -0.41) in the intervention group, albeit not a significantly greater reduction than in the control counties (model-based estimated difference in change (MBEDC): -0.75, 95% CI: -1.91 to 0.41). Oral antibiotic usage for urinary tract infections (UTI-AB) decreased 32.8%, from 4.08 to 2.74 DDD/100BD (MBEC: -1.34, 95% CI: -1.85 to -0.84), a significantly greater reduction than in the control counties (MBEDC: -0.9, 95% CI: -1.28 to -0.31). The multifaceted intervention may reduce UTI-AB use in NHs, whereas adjustments in the implementation strategy may be needed to reduce total antibiotic use.

Antibiotic Prescribing in United States Nursing Homes, 2013-2017

In this national cohort of older adults residing long-term in US nursing homes between 2013 and 2017, we calculated period prevalence estimates for antibiotic prescribing, rates of prescribing, and days of therapy. Among 1 375 062 residents, 66.2% were prescribed at least 1 antibiotic during the nursing home stay. The most prevalent antibiotic classes were fluoroquinolones, sulfonamides and related agents, and first-generation cephalosporins. Levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim were the most prevalent antibiotics. These results can inform antibiotic stewardship interventions to reduce antibiotic overprescribing, improve appropriateness, and reduce related adverse outcomes in nursing homes.

Antibiotic postprescribing modification opportunities among nursing home residents treated for urinary tract infection

Objective:

To characterize opportunities to postprescriptively modify antibiotic prescriptions initiated for treatment of suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) in nursing homes.

Design:

Cross-sectional cohort study.

Methods:

Data from the health records of residents treated for UTI between 2013 and 2014 in 5 Wisconsin nursing homes were abstracted using a structured approach. Explicit definitions were used to identify whether the prescribed antibiotic could have been stopped, shortened, or changed to a nonfluoroquinolone alternative. Antibiotic treatments appropriately modified by study nursing home providers in real time were not considered modifiable. Identification of >1 potential modification opportunity (eg, stop and shorten) per antibiotic treatment event was permitted.

Results:

In total, 356 eligible antibiotic treatment courses among 249 unique residents were identified. Only 59 antibiotic courses prescribed for treatment of suspected UTI (16.6%) were not amenable to any modification. Discontinuation of treatment due to lack of signs or symptoms of infection was the most frequently identified potential modification opportunity (66.2%). Although less common, substantial numbers of antibiotic treatment courses were potentially amenable to shortening (34%) or agent change (19%) modifications. If applied in concert at 72 hours after antibiotic initiation, stop and shorten modifications could eradicate up to 1,326 avoidable antibiotic days, and change modifications could remove a 32 remaining avoidable fluoroquinolone days.

Conclusions:

Substantial opportunity exists to enhance the quality of antibiotic prescribing for treatment of suspected UTI in nursing homes through postprescriptive review interventions. Additional studies examining how to best design and implement postprescriptive review interventions in nursing homes are needed.

Nursing Effect Analysis of Urinary Tract Infections in Urology Surgery Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aims to identify urinary tract infections (UTIs) in patients with different levels of age groups. For both diagnosis and treatment of UTIs, antibiotics have been widely used in nursing home settings. We also aimed to evaluate the duration of catheterization in UTI patients to reduce catheter-associated complications. We conducted a systematic review that was performed following the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" (PRISMA) guidelines and recommendations from Cochrane Collaboration. We performed a comprehensive search for published literature in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Taylor & Francis Online, Springer, and Wiley Online databases from 2010 to June 25, 2021. We performed two meta-analysis: the first meta-analysis (meta-analysis I) was performed on data obtained from included studies that compared patients with UTIs (experimental group) and without UTIs (control group); the second meta-analysis (meta-analysis II) was performed to assess the appropriate use of a catheter in UTI patients. All statistical analyses were conducted using the Review Manager 5.4 tool. A total of 15 research articles were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Of these, results showed the identification of critical patients with UTIs and without UTIs from nursing resident homes (risk ratio [RR] = 0.80 95% confidence interval CI = 0.69-0.93 p < 0.0001). Risk ratio results with random effects (RE) were obtained as RR = 0.69 95% CI = 0.26-1.83, p = 0.45, along with heterogeneity I ² (96%) values. No appropriate prescription of antibiotics in UTIs is practiced among nursing home residents. In addition, pooled results between two groups (short-duration vs. long-duration catheterization) showed RR 0.66 95% CI 0.46-0.93 p = 0.02, I ² = 56, that reduced complications associated with CAUTIs. This systematic review and meta-analysis suggested an appropriate use of agents and catheter insertion for a short duration at nursing homes.

An Electronic Health Record Integrated Decision Tool and Supportive Interventions to Improve Antibiotic Prescribing for Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Homes: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated decision tool, combined with supportive interventions, results in more appropriate antibiotic prescribing in nursing home (NH) residents with suspected urinary tract infection (UTI), without negative consequences for residents.

DESIGN

Cluster randomized controlled trial with NHs as the randomization unit; intervention group NHs received the EHR-integrated decision tool and supportive interventions, and control group NHs provided care as usual.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

212 residents with suspected UTI, from 16 NHs in the Netherlands.

METHODS

Physicians collected data at index consultation (ie, UTI suspicion) and during a 21-day follow-up period (March 2019-March 2020). Overall antibiotic prescribing data at NH level, 12 months prior to and during the study, was derived from the electronic prescribing system. The primary study outcome was the percentage of antibiotic prescriptions for suspected UTI that was appropriate, at index consultation. Secondary study outcomes included changes in treatment decision, complications, UTI-related hospitalization, and mortality during follow-up; and pre-post study changes in antibiotic prescribing at the NH level.

RESULTS

295 suspected UTIs were included (intervention group: 189; control group: 106). The between-group difference in appropriate antibiotic prescribing was 13% [intervention group: 62%, control group: 49%; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.43, 95% CI 0.57-3.62]. In both groups, complications (2% vs 3%), UTI-related hospitalization (2% vs 1%), and possible UTI-related mortality (2% vs 2%) were rare. The pre-post study difference in antibiotic prescriptions per 1000 resident-care days was -0.95 in the intervention group NHs and -0.05 in the control group NHs (P = .02).

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Although appropriate antibiotic prescribing improved in the intervention group, this does not provide sufficient evidence for our multidisciplinary intervention. Despite this inconclusive result, our intervention could potentially still be effective, because we established a large reduction in the number of antibiotic prescriptions in the intervention group.

Temporal and regional trends of antibiotic use in long-term aged care facilities across 39 countries, 1985-2019: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic misuse is a key contributor to antimicrobial resistance and a concern in long-term aged care facilities (LTCFs). Our objectives were to: i) summarise key indicators of systemic antibiotic use and appropriateness of use, and ii) examine temporal and regional variations in antibiotic use, in LTCFs (PROSPERO registration CRD42018107125).

METHODS & FINDINGS

Medline and EMBASE were searched for studies published between 1990-2021 reporting antibiotic use rates in LTCFs. Random effects meta-analysis provided pooled estimates of antibiotic use rates (percentage of residents on an antibiotic on a single day [point prevalence] and over 12 months [period prevalence]; percentage of appropriate prescriptions). Meta-regression examined associations between antibiotic use, year of measurement and region. A total of 90 articles representing 78 studies from 39 countries with data between 1985-2019 were included. Pooled estimates of point prevalence and 12-month period prevalence were 5.2% (95% CI: 3.3-7.9; n = 523,171) and 62.0% (95% CI: 54.0-69.3; n = 946,127), respectively. Point prevalence varied significantly between regions (Q = 224.1, df = 7, p<0.001), and ranged from 2.4% (95% CI: 1.9-2.7) in Eastern Europe to 9.0% in the British Isles (95% CI: 7.6-10.5) and Northern Europe (95% CI: 7.7-10.5). Twelve-month period prevalence varied significantly between regions (Q = 15.1, df = 3, p = 0.002) and ranged from 53.9% (95% CI: 48.3-59.4) in the British Isles to 68.3% (95% CI: 63.6-72.7) in Australia. Meta-regression found no association between year of measurement and antibiotic use prevalence. The pooled estimate of the percentage of appropriate antibiotic prescriptions was 28.5% (95% CI: 10.3-58.0; n = 17,245) as assessed by the McGeer criteria. Year of measurement was associated with decreasing appropriateness of antibiotic use over time (OR:0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.91). The most frequently used antibiotic classes were penicillins (n = 44 studies), cephalosporins (n = 36), sulphonamides/trimethoprim (n = 31), and quinolones (n = 28).

CONCLUSIONS

Coordinated efforts focusing on LTCFs are required to address antibiotic misuse in LTCFs. Our analysis provides overall baseline and regional estimates for future monitoring of antibiotic use in LTCFs.

Poor clinical outcomes associated with suboptimal antibiotic treatment among older long-term care facility residents with urinary tract infection: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic use is associated with several antibiotic-related harms in vulnerable, older long-term care (LTC) residents. Suboptimal antibiotic use may also be associated with harms but has not yet been investigated. The aim of this work was to compare rates of poor clinical outcomes among LTC residents with UTI receiving suboptimal versus optimal antibiotic treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study among residents with an incident urinary tract infection (UTI) treated in Veterans Affairs LTC units (2013-2018). Potentially suboptimal antibiotic treatment was defined as use of a suboptimal initial antibiotic drug choice, dose frequency, and/or excessive treatment duration. The primary outcome was time to a composite measure of poor clinical outcome, defined as UTI recurrence, acute care hospitalization/emergency department visit, adverse drug event, Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), or death within 30 days of antibiotic discontinuation. Shared frailty Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to compare the time-to-event between suboptimal and optimal treatment.

RESULTS

Among 19,701 LTC residents with an incident UTI, 64.6% received potentially suboptimal antibiotic treatment and 35.4% experienced a poor clinical outcome. In adjusted analyses, potentially suboptimal antibiotic treatment was associated with a small increased hazard of poor clinical outcome (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11) as compared with optimal treatment, driven by an increased hazard of CDI (aHR 1.94, 95% CI 1.54-2.44).

CONCLUSION

In this national cohort study, suboptimal antibiotic treatment was associated with a 6% increased risk of the composite measure of poor clinical outcomes, in particular, a 94% increased risk of CDI. Beyond the decision to use antibiotics, clinicians should also consider the potential harms of suboptimal treatment choices with regards to drug type, dose frequency, and duration used.

Comparison of criteria for determining appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in nursing homes

BACKGROUND

Measuring the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in nursing homes remains a challenge. The revised McGeer criteria, which are widely used to conduct infection surveillance in nursing homes, were not designed to assess antibiotic appropriateness. The Loeb criteria were explicitly designed for this purpose but are infrequently used outside investigational studies. The extent to which the revised McGeer and Loeb criteria overlap and can be used interchangeably for tracking antibiotic appropriateness in nursing homes remains insufficiently studied.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional chart review study in 5 Wisconsin nursing homes and applied the revised McGeer and Loeb criteria to all nursing home-initiated antibiotic treatment courses. Kappa (κ) statistics were employed to assess level of agreement overall and by treatment indications.

RESULTS

Overall, 734 eligible antibiotic courses were initiated in participating nursing homes during the study period. Of 734 antibiotic courses, 372 (51%) satisfied the Loeb criteria, while only 211 (29%) of 734 satisfied the revised McGeer criteria. Only 169 (23%) of 734 antibiotic courses satisfied both criteria, and the overall level of agreement between them was fair (κ = 0.35). When stratified by infection type, levels of agreement between the revised McGeer and Loeb criteria were moderate for urinary tract infections (κ = 0.45), fair for skin and soft-tissue infections (0.36), and slight for respiratory tract infections (0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Agreement between the revised McGeer and Loeb criteria is limited, and nursing homes should employ the revised McGeer and Loeb criteria for their intended purposes. Studies to establish the best method for ongoing monitoring of antibiotic appropriateness in nursing homes are needed.

Antimicrobial Use in a Cohort of US Nursing Homes, 2017

IMPORTANCE

Controlling antimicrobial resistance in health care is a public health priority, although data describing antimicrobial use in US nursing homes are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the prevalence of antimicrobial use and describe antimicrobial classes and common indications among nursing home residents.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Cross-sectional, 1-day point-prevalence surveys of antimicrobial use performed between April 2017 and October 2017, last survey date October 31, 2017, and including 15 276 residents present on the survey date in 161 randomly selected nursing homes from selected counties of 10 Emerging Infections Program (EIP) states. EIP staff reviewed nursing home records to collect data on characteristics of residents and antimicrobials administered at the time of the survey. Nursing home characteristics were obtained from nursing home staff and the Nursing Home Compare website.

EXPOSURES

Residence in one of the participating nursing homes at the time of the survey.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Prevalence of antimicrobial use per 100 residents, defined as the number of residents receiving antimicrobial drugs at the time of the survey divided by the total number of surveyed residents. Multivariable logistic regression modeling of antimicrobial use and percentages of drugs within various classifications.

RESULTS

Among 15 276 nursing home residents included in the study (mean [SD] age, 77.6 [13.7] years; 9475 [62%] women), complete prevalence data were available for 96.8%. The overall antimicrobial use prevalence was 8.2 per 100 residents (95% CI, 7.8-8.8). Antimicrobial use was more prevalent in residents admitted to the nursing home within 30 days before the survey date (18.8 per 100 residents; 95% CI, 17.4-20.3), with central venous catheters (62.8 per 100 residents; 95% CI, 56.9-68.3) or with indwelling urinary catheters (19.1 per 100 residents; 95% CI, 16.4-22.0). Antimicrobials were most often used to treat active infections (77% [95% CI, 74.8%-79.2%]) and primarily for urinary tract infections (28.1% [95% CI, 15.5%-30.7%]). While 18.2% (95% CI, 16.1%-20.1%) were for medical prophylaxis, most often use was for the urinary tract (40.8% [95% CI, 34.8%-47.1%]). Fluoroquinolones were the most common antimicrobial class (12.9% [95% CI, 11.3%-14.8%]), and 33.1% (95% CI, 30.7%-35.6%) of antimicrobials used were broad-spectrum antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional survey of a cohort of US nursing homes in 2017, prevalence of antimicrobial use was 8.2 per 100 residents. This study provides information on the patterns of antimicrobial use among these nursing home residents.

Urinary tract infection treatment practices in nursing homes reporting to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2017

We describe differences between urinary tract infection treatment and events reported by nursing homes enrolled in the National Healthcare Safety Network. In 2017, almost 4 times as many antibiotic starts as infection events were reported, suggesting that opportunities exist for antibiotic stewardship and improvement of urinary tract infection reporting.

Predictors of potentially suboptimal treatment of urinary tract infections in long-term care facilities

BACKGROUND

Suboptimal antibiotic treatment of urinary tract infection (UTI) is high in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) and likely varies between facilities. Large-scale evaluations have not been conducted.

AIM

To identify facility-level predictors of potentially suboptimal treatment of UTI in Veterans Affairs (VA) LTCFs and to quantify variation across facilities.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 21,938 residents in 120 VA LTCFs (2013-2018) known as Community Living Centers (CLCs). Potentially suboptimal treatment was assessed from drug choice, dose frequency, and/or treatment duration. To identify facility characteristics predictive of suboptimal UTI treatment, LTCFs with higher and lower rates of suboptimal treatment (≥median, < median) were compared using unconditional logistic regression models. Joinpoint regression models were used to quantify average percentage difference across facilities. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to quantify variation across facilities.

FINDINGS

The rate of potentially suboptimal antibiotic treatment varied from 1.7 to 34.2 per 10,000 bed-days across LTCFs. The average percentage difference in rates across facilities was 2.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-2.7). The only facility characteristic predictive of suboptimal treatment was the incident rate of UTI per 10,000 bed-days (odds ratio: 4.9; 95% CI: 2.3-10.3). Multilevel models demonstrated that 94% of the variation between facilities was unexplained after controlling for resident and CLC characteristics. The median odds ratio for the full multilevel model was 1.37.

CONCLUSION

Potentially suboptimal UTI treatment was variable across VA LTCFs. However, most of the variation across LTCFs was unexplained. Future research should continue to investigate factors that are driving suboptimal antibiotic treatment in LTCFs.

Decision Tools and Studies to Improve the Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection in Nursing Home Residents: A Narrative Review

The overdiagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in nursing home residents that results in unnecessary antibiotic treatment has been recognized for more than 2 decades. This has resulted in the publication of several decision tools for the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents. Given all of the decision tools available, how does one decide on the approach to improve the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents in the context of an antimicrobial stewardship program? To address this question, this paper reviews: (a) published decision tools for the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents; (b) randomized controlled trials to improve the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents; and (c) non-randomized studies to improve the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents. Review of published decision tools indicates that the diagnosis of UTI is based on the presence of urinary tract signs and symptoms. However, there is considerable variation in the diagnostic criteria among the decision tools and there is no consensus as to the best clinical criteria for the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents. Review of four randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents found that different interventions and outcome measures of varying complexity were utilized. Although randomized controlled trials were, to some extent, successful, it was not clear in any trial if one or more components of an intervention contributed the most to the success and there was no evidence that an intervention was feasible or sustainable after a trial was completed. Review of non-randomized trials to improve the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents all had methodologic limitations that make interpretation problematic. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies all focused on the process before an antibiotic is prescribed. An alternative approach that focuses on assessment of the post-prescription process (antibiotic time-out protocol) is reviewed; initial studies of this protocol were inconclusive because of design limitations and additional studies are required. Regardless of what interventions are utilized, there must be provider and nursing staff commitment and motivation to improve the management of residents with suspected UTI and methods to achieve improvement must be demonstrated to be feasible and sustainable given the resources available in nursing homes.

Nurse Decision-making for Suspected Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Homes: Potential Targets to Reduce Antibiotic Overuse

OBJECTIVES

To determine what information is most important to registered nurses' (RNs) decisions to call clinicians about suspected urinary tract infections (UTIs) in nursing home residents.

DESIGN

Web-based discrete choice experiment with 19 clinical scenarios.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Online survey with a convenience sample of RNs (N = 881) recruited from a health care research panel.

METHODS

Clinical scenarios used information from 10 categories of resident characteristics: UTI risk, resident type, functional status, mental status, lower urinary tract status, body temperature, physical examination, urinalysis, antibiotic request, and goals of care. Participants were randomized into 2 deliberation conditions (self-paced, n = 437 and forced deliberation, n = 444). The degree to which evidence- and non-evidence-based information was important to decision-making was estimated using unconditional multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

For all nurses (22.8%) and the self-paced group (24.1%), lower urinary tract status had the highest importance scores for the decision to call a clinician about a suspected UTI. For the forced-deliberation group, body temperature was most important (23.7%), and lower urinary tract status was less important (21%, P = .001). The information associated with the highest odds of an RN calling about a suspected UTI was painful or difficult urination [odds ratio (OR) 4.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.16-5.65], obvious blood in urine (OR 4.66, 95% CI 3.99-5.44), and temperature at 101.5° (OR 3.80, 95% CI 3.28-4.42). For the self-paced group, painful or difficult urination (OR 5.65, 95% CI 4.53-7.04) had the highest odds, whereas obvious blood in urine (OR 4.39, 95% CI 3.53-5.47) had highest odds for the forced-deliberation group.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This study highlighted the importance of specific resident characteristics in nurse decision-making about suspected UTIs. Future antimicrobial stewardship efforts should aim to not only improve the previously studied overprescribing practices of clinicians, but to improve nurses' assessment of signs and symptoms of potential infections and how they weigh resident information.

Frequency and Predictors of Suboptimal Prescribing Among a Cohort of Older Male Residents with Urinary Tract Infection

BACKGROUND

Unnecessary antibiotic treatment of suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) is common in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). However, less is known about the extent of suboptimal treatment, in terms of antibiotic choice, dose, and duration, after the decision to use antibiotics has been made.

METHODS

We described the frequency of potentially suboptimal treatment among residents with an incident UTI (first during the study with none in the year prior) in Veterans Affairs' (VA) Community Living Centers (CLCs, 2013-2018). Time trends were analyzed using Joinpoint regression. Residents with UTIs receiving potentially suboptimal treatment were compared to those receiving optimal treatment to identify resident characteristics predictive of suboptimal antibiotic treatment, using multivariable unconditional logistic regression models.

RESULTS

We identified 21,938 residents with an incident UTI treated in 120 VA CLCs, of which 96.0% were male. Potentially suboptimal antibiotic treatment was identified in 65.0% of residents and decreased 1.8% annually (p<0.05). Potentially suboptimal initial drug choice was identified in 45.6% of residents, suboptimal dose frequency in 28.6%, and longer than recommended duration in 12.7%. Predictors of suboptimal antibiotic treatment included: prior fluoroquinolone exposure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.38), chronic renal disease (aOR 1.19), age >85 years (aOR 1.17), prior skin infection (aOR 1.14), recent high white blood cell count (aOR 1.08), and genitourinary disorder (aOR 1.08).

CONCLUSION

Similar to findings in non-VA facilities, potentially suboptimal treatment was common but improving in CLC residents with an incident UTI. Predictors of suboptimal antibiotic treatment should be targeted with antibiotic stewardship interventions to improve UTI treatment.

Effect of antibiotic time-outs on modification of antibiotic prescriptions in nursing homes

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic overuse and misuse is a common problem in nursing homes. Antibiotic time-out (ATO) interventions have led to improvements in antibiotic uses in hospitals, but their impact in nursing homes remain understudied.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a stewardship intervention, promoting use of ATOs on the frequency and types of antibiotic change events (ACEs) in nursing homes.

DESIGN

Controlled before-and-after intervention study.

SETTING

Nursing homes in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

METHOD

Data on antibiotic prescriptions in 11 nursing homes were collected for 25 months. We categorized ACEs as (1) early discontinuation, (2) class modification, or (3) administration modification. Class modification ACEs were further classified based on whether the change narrowed, expanded, or had no effect on bacterial spectrum coverage. Analyses were performed using a difference-in-difference (DiD) approach.

RESULT

Of 2,647 antibiotic events initiated in study nursing homes, 376 (14.2%) were associated with an ACE. The overall proportion of ACEs did not significantly differ between intervention and control nursing homes. Early discontinuation ACEs increased in intervention nursing homes (DiD, 2.5%; P = .01), primarily affecting residents initiated on broad-spectrum antibiotics (DiD, 2.9%; P < .01). Class modification ACEs decreased in intervention nursing homes but remained unchanged in control nursing homes.

CONCLUSION

The impact of an ATO intervention in study nursing homes was mixed with increases in early discontinuation ACEs offset by reductions in class modification ACEs. More research on the potential value of ATO interventions in nursing homes is warranted.

Antimicrobial stewardship in care homes: outcomes of importance to stakeholders

BACKGROUND

Heterogeneity of outcomes measured in trials to improve antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in care homes has compromised quality of evidence. A core outcome set (COS) is needed to facilitate interpretation and synthesis of evidence in this area.

AIM

To determine outcomes deemed important by relevant stakeholders for interventions aimed at improving AMS in care homes, and to produce a refined list of outcomes that could be considered for use in future research.

METHODS

Semi-structured face-to-face or telephone interviews were conducted with key stakeholders. Outcomes reported in previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of AMS in care homes were included in a topic guide for interviews. Content analysis was undertaken to identify potential outcomes suggested by participants, followed by further review.

FINDINGS

Twenty-seven outcomes reported in RCTs were refined into a list of 12 overarching outcomes. Interviews with participants (six researchers, 31 healthcare professionals, and four family members of care home residents) identified 40 additional outcomes that were important to them. From these 52 outcomes, the total number of antimicrobials, the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing and adherence to guidelines were highlighted by most participants. After reviewing all 52 outcomes, a refined list of 14 outcomes potentially feasible for use in AMS trials in care homes was generated.

CONCLUSION

s: A number of potential outcomes for AMS in care homes, some of which had not been reported in previous studies, were identified. The refined list of 14 outcomes will be used in a future study to agree a COS for care home AMS trials.

Epidemiology of Antibiotic Use for Urinary Tract Infection in Nursing Home Residents

OBJECTIVES

Describe antibiotic use for urinary tract infection (UTI) among a large cohort of US nursing home residents.

DESIGN

Analysis of data from a multistate, 1-day point prevalence survey of antimicrobial use performed between April and October 2017.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Residents of 161 nursing homes in 10 US states of the Emerging Infections Program (EIP).

METHODS

EIP staff reviewed nursing home medical records to collect data on systemic antimicrobial drugs received by residents, including therapeutic site, rationale for use, and planned duration. For drugs with the therapeutic site documented as urinary tract, pooled mean and nursing home-specific prevalence rates were calculated per 100 nursing home residents, and proportion of drugs by selected characteristics were reported. Data were analyzed in SAS, version 9.4.

RESULTS

Among 15,276 residents, 407 received 424 antibiotics for UTI. The pooled mean prevalence rate of antibiotic use for UTI was 2.66 per 100 residents; nursing home-specific rates ranged from 0 to 13.6. One-quarter of antibiotics were prescribed for UTI prophylaxis, with a median planned duration of 111 days compared with 7 days when prescribed for UTI treatment (P < .001). Fluoroquinolones were the most common (18%) drug class used.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

One in 38 residents was receiving an antibiotic for UTI on a given day, and nursing home-specific prevalence rates varied by more than 10-fold. UTI prophylaxis was common with a long planned duration, despite limited evidence to support this practice among older persons in nursing homes. The planned duration was ≥7 days for half of antibiotics prescribed for treatment of a UTI. Fluoroquinolones were the most commonly used antibiotics, despite their association with significant adverse events, particularly in a frail and older adult population. These findings help to identify priority practices for nursing home antibiotic stewardship.

Effect of a Standard vs Enhanced Implementation Strategy to Improve Antibiotic Prescribing in Nursing Homes: A Trial Protocol of the Improving Management of Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Institutions Through Facilitated Implementation (IMUNIFI) Study

IMPORTANCE

Suspicion of urinary tract infection (UTI) is the major driver of overuse and misuse of antibiotics in nursing homes (NHs). Effects of interventions to improve the recognition and management of UTI in NHs have been mixed, potentially owing to differences in how interventions were implemented in different studies. An improved understanding of how implementation approach influences intervention adoption is needed to achieve wider dissemination of antibiotic stewardship interventions in NHs.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of 2 implementation strategies on the adoption and effects of a quality improvement toolkit to enhance recognition and management of UTIs in NHs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation clinical trial will be performed over a 6-month baseline (January to June 2019) and 12-month postimplementation period (July 2019 to June 2020). A minimum of 20 Wisconsin NHs with 50 or more beds will be recruited and randomized in block sizes of 2 stratified by rurality (rural vs urban). All residents who are tested and/or treated for UTI in study NHs will be included in the analysis. All study NHs will implement a quality improvement toolkit focused on enhancing the recognition and management of UTIs. Facilities will be randomized to either a usual or enhanced implementation approach based on external facilitation (coaching), collaborative peer learning, and peer comparison feedback. Enhanced implementation is hypothesized to be associated with improvements in adoption of the quality improvement toolkit and clinical outcomes. Primary outcomes of the study will include number of (1) urine cultures per 1000 resident days and (2) antibiotic prescriptions for treatment of suspected UTI per 1000 resident-days. Secondary outcomes of the study will include appropriateness of UTI treatments, treatment length, use of fluoroquinolones, and resident transfers and mortality. A mixed-methods evaluation approach will be used to assess extent and determinants of adoption of the UTI quality improvement toolkit in study NHs.

DISCUSSION

Knowledge gained during this study could help inform future efforts to implement antibiotic stewardship and quality improvement interventions in NHs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03520010.