Soft tissue head and neck sarcoma: experience of a tertiary referral centre over a 15-year period

Head and neck sarcomas: Thirty years of experience in a tertiary referral center in Brazil

PURPOSE

This study analyzed the demographics, clinicopathological, treatment, and survival characteristics of head and neck sarcomas (HNS) diagnosed in a tertiary reference center in Brazil.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HNS cases were retrospectively retrieved from the Department of Pathological Anatomy of the School of Medical Sciences of the State University of Campinas. The medical records were examined to extract demographic, clinicopathological, and follow-up information. The Pearson chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier curve, and Cox proportional hazards regression model were employed to identify survival and potential prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were included in the study. The majority were men (61.7%) with a mean age of 38.9 years. The nasal cavity (34.0%) was the most common anatomical site. The lesions are usually presented as volume increases (78.7%). The most common histological subtypes were chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Surgical excision alone was the most common treatment modality. Local recurrence was observed in 10 cases, and metastases in 3 cases. During a mean follow-up period of 71.9 months, from diagnosis to the last follow-up, 31 patients (65.9%) were alive without the disease. A total of 10 patients (21.3%) died of the HNS for a mean follow-up period of 14.3 months. The time to presentation of more than 6 months (p = 0.0309) and the presence of metastases (p = 0.0315) were identified as prognostic factors for survival, while male sex was found to be an independent prognostic factor for recurrence.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that the occurrence of a shorter lesion time to presentation and the presence of metastases were associated with a reduction in survival rates in patients with HNS.

A Retrospective Study of 291 Patients With Head and Neck Sarcomas: Treatment, Outcomes, and Prognostic Factors

AIMS

Sarcomas constitute a group of rare malignant neoplasms, commonly subcategorized into soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and bone sarcomas. This study aims to describe the treatment modalities and outcome of head and neck sarcoma (HNS) patients in western Denmark and to identify prognostic factors for overall survival and recurrence in HNS patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Aarhus sarcoma registry, The National Danish Sarcoma Database, and the Danish National Pathology Registry were used to identify HNS adult patients diagnosed between 1979 and 2022.

RESULTS

Altogether, 291 patients were included in this study. The prevalent histological subtypes were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (16%; 48/291) and leiomyosarcoma (15%; 44/291) for STS patients (n = 230) and chondrosarcoma (10%; 28/291) and osteosarcoma (7%; 19/291) for bone sarcoma patients (n = 61). Surgery with curative intent was performed in 71% (164/230) and 70% (43/61) of STS and bone sarcoma patients, respectively. Clear resection was achieved in 59% (97/164) of STS patients and 44% (19/43) of bone sarcoma patients. Eighty-nine patients relapsed (STS n = 66, bone sarcoma n = 23) after a median time of 2.7/5.5 years for STS/bone sarcoma patients. The five-year overall survival rates were 45% for STS patients and 66% for bone sarcoma patients. The following factors were significantly, negatively associated with overall survival in STS patients: Age (hazard ratio (HR)) = 1.02, p < 0.001), tumour size ≥5 cm (HR = 1.75, p = 0.003), metastatic disease (HR = 3.17, p < 0.001), high grade tumour (HR = 2.24, p = 0.004), previous cancer (HR = 2.84, p < 0.001), and high Aarhus composite biomarker score (ACBS) (HR = 4.56, p = 0.001). For relapse in STS patients, higher tumour grade (HR = 3.19, p = 0.014), intralesional margins (HR = 2.84, p < 0.001), ≥2 previous cancers (HR = 3.00, p = 0.004), and high ACBS (HR = 3.29, p = 0.047), were negatively associated. For bone sarcomas only higher age (HR = 1.02, p = 0.049) and intralesional margins (HR = 2.91, p = 0.042) were significant negative factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Multiple prognostic factors for overall survival and relapse were identified, especially for STS patients.

The inflammatory-nutritional score and nomogram for R0 resected head and neck soft tissue sarcoma

OBJECTIVES

To explore the predictive value of inflammatory-nutritional score (INS) and a nomogram for survivals in head and neck soft tissue sarcoma (HNSTS) patients with negative resection margins (R0).

METHODS

Clinical characteristics and hematological features of 315 HNSTS patients underwent R0 surgery were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, 3-year recurrence-free survival rate and disease-free survival (DFS) rate were 77.3%, 61.0% and 55.4%, respectively. High INS was associated with a deep tumor location (p < 0.001), high tumor grade (p < 0.001), and advanced AJCC stage (p < 0.001). The low-risk group (INS 0) exhibited a higher 5-year OS rate and 3-year DFS rate than others (87.6% vs. 81.3% vs. 53.3%, p < 0.001; 62.2% vs. 56.9% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.007). The INS (p = 0.023), tumor depth (p < 0.001), pT classification (p = 0.022), pN classification (p < 0.001) and tumor grade (p < 0.001) were independent survival predictors. Moreover, a novel nomogram for predicting OS was generated and assessed by the concordance index, exhibiting a better performance than the p7TNMG classification alone (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For R0 resected HNSTS patients, the oncological outcomes can be predicted using the INS system and a specific nomogram.

Do the Histological Differences of Soft Tissue Sarcomas Affect the Rate of Skin Defect Reconstruction?

BACKGROUND

In soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection, flap reconstruction and/or skin grafting is frequently required. However, it is not clear whether the histological difference affects the rate of reconstruction. The present study aimed to investigate it.

METHODS

This study compared in 5 classifications (105 adipocytic tumors, 102 fibroblastic tumors, 39 muscle tumors, 31 peripheral nerve sheath tumors, and 178 tumors of uncertain differentiation). In addition, the reconstruction rates of detailed tumor sites were compared. The median and case number (percentage) were calculated.

RESULTS

Tumor size (adipocytic 112 mm vs fibroblastic 79 mm, muscle 72 mm, nerve 90 mm, uncertain 74 mm, P < 0.0001 in all comparisons), histological low-grade rates (adipocytic 43.8% vs uncertain 3.9%, P < 0.0001; fibroblastic 46.1% vs muscle 15.4%, P = 0.003; fibroblastic vs uncertain, P < 0.0001; nerve 19.4% vs uncertain, P = 0.003) and reconstruction rates (adipocytic 5.7% vs fibroblastic 42.2%, muscle 33.3%, nerve 32.3%, uncertain 25.8%, P < 0.0001 in all comparisons) were significantly different. In the region of lower extremity, the regions of thigh [adipocytic 1/62 (1.6%) vs fibroblastic 7/32 (21.9%), P = 0.002], and lower leg [adipocytic 1/16 (6.3%) vs fibroblastic 11/19 (57.9%), P = 0.002] were significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

In adipocytic tumors, the tumor size was significantly large; however, the skin defect reconstruction rate was significantly lower than that of the other STS. Histologically, the reconstruction rate of STS derived from superficial tissue increases, whereas the reconstruction rate derived from deep tissue such as adipocytic tumor decreases.

Pretreatment tumor sampling and prognostic factors in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Insufficient preoperative work-up and consequent intralesional or marginal resection of soft-tissue sarcomas of the head and neck (STSHNs) is common.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study comprised 63 patients with STSHN treated at the Helsinki University Hospital between 2005 and 2017. We assessed the effect of pretreatment tumor sampling on surgical margin status and need for supplemental surgery, as well as prognostic factors and survival.

RESULTS

The lack of representative pretreatment biopsy specimen was associated with unfavorable margin status. Primary surgery at a non-academic center was associated with need for supplemental surgery. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 68%, disease-specific survival (DSS) 71%, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) 61%. Higher tumor grade and primary tumor size over 5 cm were associated with reduced DSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis and management of STSHNs should be centralized to experienced academic centers. Decision-making between needle biopsy, open biopsy, or upfront radical surgery depends on tumor location and size.