Hot Saline Irrigation for Haemostasis in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Effect of hot saline irrigation on the operative field during endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Control of bleeding is very important during endoscopic sinus surgery. Saline heated up to 50 °C causes dilatation of vessels and edema without nasal mucosa necrosis. It also promotes the clotting cascade so helps in having a bloodless procedure.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 60 patients divided into two groups (30 each). Group A was the interventional group in which patients were irrigated with saline of 50 °C during surgery. Group B was the control group where room-temperature saline was used. The operative field was assessed using the Boezaart score, duration of surgery, and bleeding in ml.

RESULTS

The Boezaart score in group A came out to be 2.23 ± 0.72 whereas it was 3.43 ± 0.72 in group B. Most of the patients who were in the interventional group had their surgery completed within 60 min with comparatively less bleeding (mean bleeding = 221.83 ml). Patients of the control group had increased duration of surgery mostly and bleeding (mean = 265.67 ml). Our study showed a strong correlation amongst the Boezaart score, duration of surgery, and bleeding in ml with a p value of < 0.001 where all three variables significantly improved in the interventional group due to a good operative field provided by warm saline heated up to 50 °C.

CONCLUSION

Normal saline heated up to 50 °C is a cost-effective way to achieve a bloodless operative field during endoscopic sinus surgery. Reduced bleeding also decreases the duration of surgery.

Optimal Temperature of Irrigation Fluid for Hemostasis in Neurosurgery: A Narrative Literature Review

BACKGROUND

 Hemostasis in neurosurgery is crucial to patient and surgery outcomes, with many techniques developed for this. One area that is not appropriately characterized despite continuous anecdotal evidence the temperature of the irrigation fluid (IF) used and its effects on stemming hemorrhages. Given the ubiquitous use of IF in neurosurgery for clearing blood from the surgical field, it is important to explore its role as a hemostat and whether or not the temperature of the IF influences its hemostatic capacity. This review explored the literature for an optimal IF temperature for hemostasis in neurosurgery.

METHODS

 Database searches were conducted using MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL, with citation chaining occurring where applicable. Standard terms around neurosurgery, hemostasis, and irrigation were used.

RESULTS

 Seven articles were identified. No optimal temperature for hemostasis could be confidently synthesized from the literature owing to lack of primary investigation on the subject. After collating available information into common themes, it is suggested that that temperatures >38°C are preferred.

CONCLUSION

 The literature in this area is limited. Despite a lack of applicable systematic investigation on the topic, by exploring the physiology of hemostasis and IF, best practice guidelines for IF, and the literature on the role of the temperature of IF in other surgical specialties, it is suggested that a temperature in the range of 38 to 40°C would be most applicable to a value optimal for neurosurgery.

Safety of day-case endoscopic sinus surgery in England: An observational study using an administrative dataset

INTRODUCTION

As elective surgical services recover from the COVID-19 pandemic a movement towards day-case surgery may reduce waiting lists. However, evidence is needed to show that day-case surgery is safe for endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of day-case ESS in England.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of administrative data.

METHODS

We extracted data from the Hospital Episodes Statistics database for the 5 years from 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2019. Patients undergoing elective ESS procedures aged ≥17 years were included. Exclusion criteria included malignant neoplasm, complex systemic disease and trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery. The primary outcome was readmission within 30 days post-discharge. Multilevel, multivariable logistic regression modelling was used to compare outcomes for those operated on as day-cases and those with an overnight stay after adjusting for demographic, frailty, comorbidity and procedural covariates.

RESULTS

Data were available for 49 223 patients operated on across 129 NHS hospital trusts. In trusts operating on more than 50 patients in the study period, rates of day-case surgery varied from 20.6% to 100%. Nationally, rates of day-case surgery increased from 64.0% in the financial year 2014/2015 to 78.7% in 2018/2019. Day-case patients had lower rates of 30-day emergency readmission (odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.81). Outcomes for patients operated on in trusts with ≥80% day-case rates compared with patients operated on in trusts with <50% rates of day-case surgery were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the view that ESS can safely be performed as day-case surgery in most cases, although it will not be suitable for all patients. There appears to be scope to increase rates of day-case ESS in some hospital trusts in England.

Hemostasis in endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bleeding during endoscopic endonasal procedures can quickly obscure critical anatomic landmarks. This increases both the difficulty of the surgical procedure and the risk of complications faced by the patient. As the indications for surgical management of sinonasal pathology grow, it is important to review techniques to minimize bleeding and facilitate safe surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence continues to accumulate for best practices in the surgical management of sinonasal disease. Recently, international guidelines have attempted to summarize this body of evidence, lending further support to several interventions which have been advocated as methods to decrease bleeding during endoscopic endonasal surgery. Additional studies have specifically investigated the safety of certain commonly employed techniques. The utility of preoperative corticosteroid therapy and the use of total intravenous anesthetic techniques in increasingly validated. Further evidence supports the safety of reverse Trendelenburg positioning for surgical management of inflammatory disease.

SUMMARY

Recent wide scale systematic review of the literature regarding perioperative and intraoperative management of hemostasis has reinforced the utility of certain interventions, while others remain ambiguous.

The hemostatic effect of hot saline irrigation in endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A good control of intraoperative bleeding is key for adequate anatomical visualization during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). The objective of this review was to assess the practice of hot intranasal saline irrigation (HSI) in achieving intraoperative hemostasis and good surgical field quality during ESS.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed via PubMed, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and Cochrane from inception to June 2022. The included trials were evaluated according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. The primary outcome assessed was the intraoperative bleeding score of the surgical field. The mean arterial pressure, duration of the surgery, amount of blood loss and surgeon's satisfaction score were assessed as the secondary outcomes. The risk of bias for each study was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

RESULTS

A total of 254 records were identified after removal of duplicates. Based on the title and abstract 246 records were excluded, leaving seven full texts for further consideration. Five records were excluded following full text assessment. Three trials with a total of 212 patients were selected. Hot saline irrigation was superior to control in the intraoperative bleeding score (MD - 0.51, 95% CI - 0.84 to - 0.18; P < 0.001; I² = 72%; very low quality of evidence) and surgeon's satisfaction score (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.33; P < 0.001; I² = 0%; low quality of evidence). The duration of surgery was lengthier in control when compared to HSI (MD - 9.02, 95% CI - 11.76 to - 6.28; P < 0.001; I² = 0; very low quality of evidence). The volume of blood loss was greater in control than HSI (MD - 56.4, 95% CI - 57.30 to - 55.51; P < 0.001; I² = 0%; low quality of evidence). No significant difference between the two groups for the mean arterial pressure was noted (MD - 0.60, 95% CI - 2.17 to 0.97; P = 0.45; I² = 0%; low quality of evidence).

CONCLUSIONS

The practice of intranasal HSI during ESS is favorable in controlling intraoperative bleeding and improving the surgical field quality. It increases the surgeon's satisfaction, reduces blood loss, shortens operative time and has no effect on intraoperative hemodynamic instability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019117083.