Sex differences across developmental domains among children with a familial risk of severe mental disorders

A systematic review and meta-analysis of global and social functioning among people at risk of bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND

Functional status could predict development of bipolar disorder (BD) or have clinical significance. The relationship between BD risk and functioning is poorly understood. We undertook a systematic review examining the global and social functioning of those at risk for BD.

METHODS

We examined observational studies comparing a risk sample with healthy controls or full-threshold BD participants, using measures of global or social functioning. Risk status included family history of BD, meeting risk criteria, or having prodromal symptomatology, or premorbid functioning of persons with BD. Medline, PsycINFO, and Embase were searched. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Cross-Sectional Studies was used to assess quality. Meta-analyses were performed where possible.

RESULTS

7215 studies were screened and 40 studies were included (8474 participants). Risk samples had poorer functioning than controls, and superior functioning to participants with BD. Meta-analysis indicated poorer global functioning among persons with familial risk compared to healthy controls (mean global functional difference: 5.92; 95 % confidence interval: 7.90, 3.95; mean premorbid functioning difference: 2.31; 95 % confidence interval: 0.70, 3.92). Studies with higher proportions of female participants had slightly poorer global functioning. High heterogeneity was attributable functional measures and potentially functionally differential subgroups within the risk samples.

LIMITATIONS

Broader measures of functioning, such as neurocognition and behavioural measures, were excluded. Measures of global functioning are limited by conflating functioning and symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Functioning in the BD risk populations is intermediate to that of healthy controls and persons with BD, indicating their value in definitions of BD risk, in itself a likely heterogeneous state.

Cognitive functioning in a group of adolescents at risk for psychosis

Cognitive deficits are a core feature of schizophrenia, and impairments are present in groups at-risk for psychosis. Most at-risk studies include young adults and not younger age-groups, such as adolescents. Participants are usually help-seeking individuals, even though risk factors may also be present in non-help seeking adolescents. We aim to explore cognitive functions in a group of non-help-seeking 15-year-old adolescents at risk for psychosis compared to age- and gender matched controls, including particular focus on specific cognitive domains. Hundred participants (mean age = 15.3) were invited after completing the 14-year-old survey distributed by the Norwegian Mother-, Father- and Child Study. At-risk adolescents were selected based on high scores on 19 items assessing both psychotic experiences and anomalous self-experiences. Matched controls were selected from the same sample. Cognitive functioning was assessed using the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery and IQ using Wechsler's Abbreviated Test of Intelligence. We found that the adolescents at-risk for psychosis had significantly poorer scores than controls on the composite score of the MCCB. IQ scores were also significantly lower in the at-risk group. The results highlight general cognitive deficits as central in a group of non-help-seeking adolescents at-risk for psychosis. Results indicate that the development of cognitive impairments starts early in life in at-risk groups. It is still unclear whether specific cognitive domains, such as verbal learning, are related to psychotic symptoms or may be specifically vulnerable to symptoms of depression and anxiety.