Airway management of patients undergoing oral cancer surgery

Risk factors for postoperative recovery in oral cancer surgery: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Effective management of oral cancer necessitates a multidisciplinary approach, with surgery playing a pivotal role in treatment. However, there are many risk factors during the perioperative period that affect postoperative recovery.

PURPOSE

This study aims to identify the risk factors influencing postoperative recovery in patients undergoing oral cancer surgery, thereby optimizing perioperative management.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE

A retrospective cohort study was carried out in patients who underwent surgery for oral cancer at The Second Affiliated Hospital Of Zhejiang University School Of Medicine from Jan. to Dec. in 2023. Based on the median length of stay (LOS) of 20.42 days, we divided the study population into DL3W and DM3W groups (DL3W/DM3W: Discharged less/>3 weeks).

PREDICTOR VARIABLE

The Predictor variables included sex, age, BMI, smoke, drink, education, settlement, surgery history, tumor history, intra-operative situation, flap details, pathologic stage, treatment and laboratory examination.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE

The primary outcome was length of stay (LOS) defined as the days from the start of preoperative preparation to discharge from the hospital.

ANALYSES

Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed using the χ2 test, Fisher's exact test and t-test. A P value of 0.05 was deemed as an acceptable statistical significance level.

RESULTS

The sample was composed of 103 subjects with a mean age of 59.45 (14.20) and 71 (68.9 %) were male. The median LOS was 20.42 ((range, 10-69) days. The baseline characteristics between the DL3W and DM3W groups were generally balanced. Factors associated with LOS were BMI (95 %CI 1.01-1.15, P = 0.046), intraoperative blood loss (95 %CI 0.;99-1.00, P = 0.002), flap source (P < 0.001), and postoperative fasting time (95 %CI 0.88-0.95, P < 0.001). In the regression model, more intraoperative blood loss and longer postoperative fasting time were associated with increased. LOS and factors BMI and the use of forearm flap were associated with decreased LOS after adjusting the confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In the perioperative period for oral cancer patients, optimizing postoperative recovery may be achieved by carefully managing BMI, intraoperative blood loss, flap source, and postoperative fasting time.

Airway decision making in major head and neck surgery: Irish multicenter, multidisciplinary recommendations

Major head and neck surgery poses a threat to perioperative airway patency. Adverse airway events are associated with significant morbidity, potentially leading to hypoxic brain injury and even death. Following a review of the literature, recommendations regarding airway management in head and neck surgery were developed with multicenter, multidisciplinary agreement among all Irish head and neck units. Immediate extubation is appropriate in many cases where there is a low risk of adverse airway events. Where a prolonged definitive airway is required, elective tracheostomy provides increased airway security postoperatively while delayed extubation may be appropriate in select cases to reduce postoperative morbidity. Local institutional protocols should be developed to care for a tracheostomy once inserted. We provide guidance on decision making surrounding airway management at time of head and neck surgery. All decisions should be agreed between the operating, anesthetic, and critical care teams.

Efficacy of tracheostomy for respiratory management in patients with advanced oral cancer

BACKGROUND

Many studies have been reported on tracheostomy to prevent upper airway obstruction after surgery. Among these, the scoring system proposed by Cameron et al. quantifies various factors that influence postoperative respiratory failure. This system provides a basis for surgeons to decide whether to perform an elective tracheostomy. In this study, the authors applied the Cameron scoring system retrospectively to patients undergoing severe oral cancer surgery to reevaluate the indications for elective tracheostomy and to investigate its clinical efficacy in airway management. In this study, a sample of 20 patients who underwent oral cancer surgery was selected and divided into two groups: 10 underwent tracheostomy and 10 did not. The Cameron scoring scores for each patient were extracted, to verify whether elective tracheostomy was performed in accordance with the threshold scores. Differences in scores and significant clinical impact factors between the two groups were analyzed and compared.

RESULT

The 10 patients who underwent tracheostomy had an average Cameron score of 6.4, all scoring above the recommended threshold of 5 for tracheostomy. For the 10 patients who did not undergo tracheostomy, the average score was 2.5, with 8 out of these 10 patients scoring below 5. Significant clinical impact factors observed included the location and size of the tumor, the performance of mandibulectomy and neck dissection, and the type of reconstruction surgery.

CONCLUSION

In planning surgery for oral cancer patients, it is essential to consider the use of elective tracheostomy based on preoperative assessment of the risk of postoperative airway obstruction using tools like the Cameron scoring system, and patients' condition. Research confirms that elective tracheostomy effectively enhances airway management in patients with severe oral cancer.

Enhanced recovery after surgery, current, and future considerations in head and neck cancer

Objectives

Review of the current and relevant literature to develop a list of evidence-based recommendations that can be implemented in head and neck surgical practices. To provide rationale for the multiple aspects of comprehensive care for head and neck surgical patients. To improve postsurgical outcomes for head and neck surgical patients.

Methods

Extensive review of the medical literature was performed and relevant studies in both the head and neck surgery and other surgical specialties were considered for inclusion.

Results

A total of 18 aspects of perioperative care were included in this review. The literature search included 276 publications considered to be the most relevant and up to date evidence. Each topic is concluded with recommendation grade and quality of evidence for the recommendation.

Conclusion

Since it's conception, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have continued to push for comprehensive and evidence based postsurgical care to improve patient outcomes. Head and neck oncology is one of the newest fields to develop a protocol. Due to the complexity of this patient population and their postsurgical needs, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to facilitate recovery while minimizing complications. Current and future advances in head and neck cancer research will serve to strengthen and add new principles to a comprehensive ERAS protocol.

Level of Evidence

2a.

Airway-Associated Complications With and Without Primary Tracheotomy in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Surgery

PURPOSE

This study analyzes postoperative airway management, tracheotomy strategies, and airway-associated complications in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma in a tertiary care university hospital setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After institutional approval, airway-associated complications, tracheotomy, length of hospital stay (LOHS), and length of intensive care unit stay were retrospectively recorded. Patients were subdivided in primarily tracheotomized and not-primarily tracheotomized. Subgroup analyses dichotomized the not-primarily tracheotomized patients into secondary tracheotomized and never tracheotomized. Associations were calculated using regression analyses. A multivariate regression model was used to determine risk factors for secondary tracheotomy.

RESULTS

A total of 207 patients were included. One hundred fifty-three patients (73.9%) were primarily tracheotomized. Primarily tracheotomized patients showed longer LOHS [odds ratio (OR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.07, P =0.008] but decreased need for reventilation within the intensive care unit stay (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.15-0.99, P =0.05) compared with not-primarily tracheotomized patients. Within the not-primarily tracheotomized patients, secondary tracheotomized during the hospital stay was needed in 15 of 54 patients (27.8%). In secondary tracheotomized patients, airway management due to respiratory failure was required in 6/15 (40%) patients resulting in critical airway situations in 3/6 (50%) patients. Multivariate regression model showed secondary tracheotomy-associated with bilateral neck dissection (OR 5.93, 95% CI 1.22-28.95, P =0.03) and pneumonia (OR 16.81, 95% CI 2.31-122.51, P =0.005).

CONCLUSION

Primary tracheotomy was associated with extended LOHS, whereas secondary tracheotomy was associated with increased complications rates resulting in extended length of intensive care unit stay. Especially in not-primarily tracheotomized patients, careful individualized patient evaluation and critical re-evaluation during intensive care unit stay is necessary to avoid critical airway events.

Need for tracheostomy in major head and neck ablative surgery: a paradigm shift during the COVID-19 pandemic

INTRODUCTION

Management of the airway in the perioperative period for patients requiring major head and neck ablative surgery has commonly included the performance of elective surgical tracheostomy. This has been standard practice in most maxillofacial units across the UK, including ours. However, the COVID-19 pandemic and emerging guidelines on aerosol-generating procedures required us to revisit the need for a perioperative tracheostomy.

METHODS

We present our series of 29 consecutive cases, cared for during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, that were managed either using surgical tracheostomy or overnight tracheal intubation.

RESULTS

Out of 29 patients 3 received a surgical tracheostomy. The average duration of tracheostomy use was 8 days. Twenty patients were managed using a period of overnight tracheal intubation. Average duration of tracheal intubation was 1.2 days, with an average intensive care unit stay of 1.7 days. The average duration of hospital stay was 15.8 days for patients managed with overnight tracheal intubation and 30.1 days for patients who received a surgical tracheostomy. The return to theatre rate was 13.8% for reasons including flap failure and neck space infection. There were no airway issues reported in this series of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that overnight tracheal intubation can be a safe alternative to surgical tracheostomy in the majority of cases.

Lateral position for difficult intubation in a patient with history of hemiglossectomy and flap reconstruction: a case report

Background

Reconstructive head and neck surgery can alter upper airway anatomy. We report a difficult intubation in a patient with a history of hemiglossectomy and reconstruction.

Case presentation

A 65-year-old female patient, who had undergone hemiglossectomy with the flap reconstruction, underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. After the loss of consciousness during anesthesia induction, we failed to perform direct and oral fiberoptic intubation using a video laryngoscope and nasal fiberoptic intubation without or with video laryngoscope assistance in the supine position. Finally, shifting the patient to the left-lateral position allowed successful nasal fiberoptic intubation. Postoperatively, we were informed that she was unable to sleep in the supine position because of airway obstruction and therefore always slept on her side.

Conclusion

Preanesthetic evaluation of the influence of body position on the airway patency during sleep or sedation may aid in airway management.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Sore Throat After Nasotracheal Intubation

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative sore throat is relatively frequent complication after orotracheal intubation. However, there are few reports about postoperative sore throat in nasotracheal intubation. In this retrospective study, we investigated the risk factors of postoperative sore throat in nasotracheal intubation.

METHODS

Anesthesia records of patients 16 to 80 years of age who underwent nasotracheal intubation were included. Patients underwent oral and maxillofacial surgery from February 2015 until September 2018. Airway device (Macintosh laryngoscope, Pentax-AWS, or McGRATH video laryngoscope, or fiberoptic scope), sex, age, height, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, intubation attempts, duration of intubation, intubation time, tube size, and fentanyl and remifentanil dose were investigated. Fisher exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Welch t test, and Steel-Dwass multiple test were used, and a multivariable analysis was performed using stepwise logistic regression to determine the risk factors of postoperative sore throat.

RESULTS

A total of 169 cases were analyzed, and 126 patients (74.6%) had a postoperative sore throat. Based on the univariate analysis of the data, 12 factors were determined to be potentially related to the occurrence of a postoperative sore throat. However, after evaluation using stepwise logistic regression analysis, the 2 remaining variables that correlated with postoperative sore throat were airway device (P &lt; .05) and intubation attempts (P = .04). In the model using logistic regression analysis, the fiberoptic scope had the strongest influence on the incidence of sore throat with reference to Pentax-AWS (odds ratio = 5.25; 95% CI = 1.54-17.92; P &lt; .05).

CONCLUSION

Use of a fiberoptic scope was identified as an independent risk factor for postoperative throat discomfort. Compared with direct laryngoscopy and other video laryngoscopes, the use of a fiberoptic scope had a significantly higher incidence of sore throat.

Airway Management Strategy Using Seldinger Minitracheostomy Kit to Prevent Airway Obstruction after Oral Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study

A minitracheostomy (MTS) is performed after surgery for oral cancer at our institution in patients who are at risk of postoperative airway obstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of preventive airway management with this procedure. A total of 105 patients undergoing preventive airway management with a Seldinger MTS kit after oral cancer surgery between October 2014 and March 2020 were enrolled. Information on patient characteristics, time required for the MTS, duration of tracheal cannula placement, and MTS-related complications was obtained from both the medical and anesthesia records. In addition, the numbers of postoperative instances of tracheotomy between April 2009 and September 2014 and extubation between October 2014 and March 2020 were also counted for a comparison. The time required for an MTS was 3.2±2.6 min. Minor complications, including mild subcutaneous or mediastinal emphysema and bleeding, were found in 5 patients, but all recovered in a short time. The median duration of tracheal cannula placement was 2 days, with a range of from 0 to 8 days. A total of 348 oral cancer surgeries were performed between April 2009 and September 2014. Among patients undergoing these procedures, 111 underwent a tracheostomy (32%), 235 extubation (68%), and 2 sustained intubation. A total of 580 oral cancer surgeries were performed between October 2014 and March 2020. Here, 121 patients underwent a tracheostomy (21%), 105 an MTS (18%), and 354 extubation (61%). The results suggest that an MTS can be performed safely and smoothly with no significant complications. They also suggest that an MTS reduces the need for a full tracheostomy and the risk of airway obstruction after extubation. We conclude that airway management strategy with an MTS is a useful option in preventing airway obstruction following oral cancer surgery.

Identification of patients for a delayed extubation strategy versus elective tracheostomy for postoperative airway management in major oral cancer surgery: A prospective observational study in seven hundred and twenty patients

OBJECTIVES

Tracheostomy (TT) and delayed extubation (DE) are two approaches to postoperative airway management in patients after major oral cancer surgery. We planned a study to determine the safety of overnight intubation followed by extubation the next morning (DE) compared to elective TT and to identify factors that were associated with a safe DE (maintenance of a patent airway).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study in a tertiary referral cancer care center. We included adult patients undergoing elective major oral cancer surgery under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. The decision regarding postoperative airway management using either TT or DE was made according to the usual practice at our center.

RESULTS

We screened a total of 4477 patients, 720 patients were included. DE was performed in 417 patients (58.4%) and TT in 303 patients (42.4%). On multivariable analysis, T1-T2 tumor stage, absence of extensive resection, primary closure or reconstruction using fasciocutaneous flap, absence of preoperative radiation, no neck dissection or unilateral neck dissection and shorter duration of anesthesia were independent predictors for a safe DE. Overall complications (4.3% versus 22.5%, p = 0.00) and airway complications (1.7% versus 8.7%, p = 0.00) were lower in the DE compared to the TT group respectively. DE was associated with a shorter hospital stay (7.2 ± 3.7 versus 11.5 ± 7.2 days, p = 0.00), time to oral intake and speech compared to TT.

CONCLUSIONS

A DE strategy after major oral cancer surgery is a safe alternative to TT in a select group of patients.

Comparison of performance characteristics of C-MAC video, McCoy, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in elective cervical spine surgery

Background and Aims:

To compare the performance characteristics of C-MAC video, McCoy, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in elective cervical spine surgery. The primary objective was to assess the ease of intubation with the three study devices. The secondary objectives were the time to intubation and hemodynamic responses during intubation.

Material and Methods :

The prospective observational comparative study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Adult ASA 1 and 11 patients who underwent elective cervical spine surgery were included in the study. Patients with unstable spine and trauma were excluded. The analysis of variance, Bonferroni test, Chi square test and multiple comparison tests were used to compare the performance characteristics of laryngoscopes.

Results:

The C-MAC video laryngoscope improved glottis view by improving the modified Cormack–Lehane (CL) score and the percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score compared to McCoy and Macintosh laryngoscopes. The ease of intubation was better with the C-MAC video laryngoscope compared to the McCoy and Macintosh laryngoscopes. The time to intubation was comparable between the three laryngoscopes. The C-MAC video and McCoy laryngoscopes had 100% successful first attempt intubations while it was 90% for the Macintosh laryngoscope. Hemodynamic variables observed during intubation were comparable between the three groups.

Conclusion:

The use of C-MAC video laryngoscope resulted in better visualization of the glottis and easier tracheal intubation as compared to the Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes in cervical spine surgery. Both C-MAC video and McCoy laryngoscopes had 100% successful first attempt intubation.

Endotracheal Tube Migration Associated With Extension During Tracheotomy

Tracheotomy is occasionally performed to prevent postoperative airway obstruction especially for invasive surgical procedures involving head and neck cancer. When performed under general anesthesia, attention must be paid to avoid rupture of the tracheal tube cuff during the incision into the trachea. In this study, changes in the position of the endotracheal tube tip during extension of the head and neck for a tracheotomy were investigated. Twelve patients underwent placement of a tracheotomy during surgical procedures for oral cancer. After nasal intubation, the distance between the tube tip and the carina was measuring using a fiberoptic scope with the patient's head placed at an angle of 110°. Patients were repositioned for tracheotomy by placing a pillow under the shoulders and extending the head and neck at an angle of 140°. The distance measurements were subsequently repeated. The difference between the first and second measurements was calculated and analyzed statistically using a paired t test. On average the patients were 69.5 ± 9.0 years in age. The distance between the tube tip and the carina at an angle of 140° (3.6 ± 1.1 cm) was significantly longer than that at an angle of 110° (1.7 ± 1.0 cm) (p < 0.001). The migration in the positioning of the endotracheal tube tip was 1.9 ± 0.7 cm (range: 0.7-3.7 cm) upon extension. In 3 cases, the tube cuff was ruptured during incision of the trachea. The endotracheal tube tip may migrate in the cephalad direction approximately 2 cm as a result of the extension of the patient's head and neck during a tracheotomy. Therefore, consideration should be given to advancing the endotracheal tube tip towards the caudal side and to confirming the position of the tube and cuff during a tracheotomy.

Procedural Challenges During Intubation in Patients With Oropharyngeal Masses: A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

In patients who undergo surgery for oropharyngeal masses, intubation is almost always successful. However, technical aspects of airway management, including bag mask ventilation and oxygenation, may still be difficult. Although rates of airway difficulty and intubation success in these patients have been studied, these data may not reflect difficulty with individual components of the intubation process. We hypothesized that rates of complications with individual elements of the intubation process would not be reflected in the rate of eventual intubation success. To test our hypothesis, we observed the process of airway management and resulting complications with oxygenation and bag mask ventilation in patients with oropharyngeal masses undergoing otorhinolaryngology procedures under general anesthesia.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with oropharyngeal masses scheduled for surgery were observed during the process of airway management. Observers recorded the number of airway devices used, the overall number of intubation attempts, the number and type of manual maneuvers required during bag mask ventilation, and the incidence of oxygen desaturation. The eventual intubation success rate was also recorded.

RESULTS

All 44 patients (100%; 95% CI, 92%-100%) were successfully intubated. Thirty-six (81.8%) of 44 patients were intubated asleep and 8 (18.2%) of 44 were intubated awake using flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Thirty-one (86.1%) of 36 patients who were intubated asleep received bag mask ventilation before intubation, while the other 5 patients underwent a rapid sequence induction. Twenty-seven (61.4%) of 44 patients (95% CI, 45%-75%) had ≥1 complication during airway management. Ten (23%) of 44 patients (95% CI, 11%-37%) required ≥3 attempts to intubate, 21 (68%) of 31 patients (95% CI, 49%-83%) had difficult mask ventilation, and 15 patients (34%; 95% CI, 20%-50%) experienced desaturation (oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry, <95%).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that, although all patients were successfully intubated, clinicians frequently encountered complications with both intubation and mask ventilation. These complications required frequent use of additional manual maneuvers during mask ventilation and a high incidence of oxygen desaturation. The difficulty of airway management in patients with oropharyngeal masses may not be effectively assessed by success rate alone.

A data review of airway management in patients with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer: a single-institution experience

Background

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer impose significant threat to airway management. Head and neck radiotherapy (HNRT) may further increase the difficulty of tracheal intubation. We hypothesized that a history of HNRT would be associated with a high rate of difficult tracheal intubation.

Methods

Adult patients with a history of HNRT were identified. Non-HNRT controls were case-matched by age, sex and body mass index. The tracheal intubation status between the two patient groups (treated vs. untreated with HNRT) was compared. The t test was used to evaluate differences in continuous variables between the 2 groups. Fisher’s exact test or a chi-square test was used to test for associations between radiation status and patient characteristics that may be associated with difficult tracheal intubation. Odds ratio and its confidence interval were used to assess the effect of radiation status on intubation status.

Results

The final cohort of 472 matched patients in age, sex and body mass index consisted of 236 patients who had HNRT before surgery and 236 who had upfront surgery without HNRT. The percentage of patients who had restricted neck range of motion in the HNRT group was significantly higher than in the control group (22.3% vs. 11.0%; p = 0.001). The proportion of patients with trismus (p = 0.11) or difficult tracheal intubation (p = 0.73) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. 12.7% patients in the study had difficult tracheal intubation. Patients who had mallampati scores of 3 or 4 had significantly higher rate of difficult tracheal intubation than did patients with mallampati scores of 1 or 2 (17.8% vs. 8.7%; p = 0.004). Multivariate logistic regression model showed no difference between HNRT and intubation status after adjusting neck range of motion and mallampati score (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.510 to1.612).

Conclusions

Previous treatment with HNRT was not associated with additional risk of difficult tracheal intubation. Mallampati score may be a sensitive measurement for difficult tracheal intubation in this patient population.

Elective Tracheostomy in Head and Neck Surgery: Our Experience

INTRODUCTION

Tracheostomy is commonly used to secure the airway during the immediate postoperative period in maxillofacial oncological operations. We conducted a study to review the utility of elective tracheostomy in head and neck surgery.

AIM

To review the incidence of intraoperative, perioperative and postoperative complications and its management in elective tracheostomy and to analyse its utility in head and neck surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included review of 50 patients, who were treated for head and neck cancers in the Department of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery of our centre between January 2011 to December 2014.

RESULTS

The study showed a male predilection with mean tracheostomy time of 25 minutes and operative time of 11 hours. The patients had an ICU stay of two days and elective ventilation of one day with mild tracheal secretion seen postoperatively. No other complications were noted intraoperatively or postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Elective tracheostomy even though an invasive tool when used properly in selected patients, can be safe and beneficial to the patients.

Effectiveness and Validity of Sonographic Upper Airway Evaluation to Predict Difficult Laryngoscopy

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of 9 airway sonographic parameters imaged from the submandibular view as predictors of difficult laryngoscopy. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the validity of the models of combined sonographic and clinical tests in predicting difficult laryngoscopy.

METHODS

This study analyzed a sample of 199 patients who were categorized as having easy (grades 1 and 2) or difficult (grades 3 and 4) laryngoscopy during general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation based on the laryngoscopic criteria of Cormack and Lahane (Anaesthesia 1984; 39:1105-1111). Nine sonographic parameters imaged from the submandibular view, including the hyomental distance in neutral and extended positions, hyomental distance ratio, tongue cross-sectional area, tongue width, tongue volume, tongue thickness-to-oral cavity height ratio, and floor of the mouth muscle cross-sectional area and volume, were analyzed. The validity of the models encompassing combined screening tests was assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (11.1%) were categorized as having difficult laryngoscopy. Statistically significant differences between patients with difficult and easy laryngoscopy were noted for 5 of 9 parameters. The diagnostic validity profiles showed poor sensitivity (9.1%-42.9%) and positive predictive value (4.5%-66.7%), but good specificity (71.8%-97.7%) and negative predictive value (87.1%-94.5%). The combination of tests improved the diagnostic validity profile (area under the curve, 0.852).

CONCLUSIONS

Sonographic predictors may help identify patients with difficult laryngoscopy. Individual measures have unsatisfactory diagnostic profiles. The models based on combined tests have improved diagnostic value.

Airway management and postoperative length of hospital stay in patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgery

Background and Aims:

General anesthesia and airway management of patients for head and neck cancer surgery is a challenge for the anesthesiologist. Appropriate assessment and planning are essential for successful airway management. Our objectives were to review airway management strategies in patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgery in our tertiary care institution and also to observe the effect of airway management techniques on postoperative length of hospital stay (PLOS).

Material and Methods:

A retrospective medical record review of 400 patients who underwent major head and neck cancer surgery in our institution was conducted. A special form was used, and records were searched for airway and anesthetic management in the operating room and recovery room, and for PLOS.

Results:

289 (72.25%) of the patients were male, and 111 (27.75%) female. 49.8% of patients had Mallampati score of 3 and 4. Airway was managed with tracheostomy in 81 (20.25%) patients; nasal intubation was performed in 177 (44.25%) and oral intubation in 142 (35.5%) patients. Postoperative emergency tracheostomy was not done in any of the patients.

Conclusion:

Median postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer (P = 0.0005) in patients who had a tracheostomy performed compared with those where the airway was managed without it.

Inferiorly based buccinator myomucosal island flap in oral and pharyngeal reconstruction. Four techniques to increase its application

INTRODUCTION

Reconstruction of oral and pharyngeal defects after pathologic resections with the same tissue is an optimal and ideal target. Islanded variety of inferiorly pedicled facial artery musculomucosal flap, in which facial artery and vein are skeletonized (referred to as inferiorly based BUMIF), is suitable for reconstruction of medium-sized mucosal defects.

PRESENTATION OF CASES

In this article, with four cases, modifications of this flap are demonstrated in reconstruction of large intraoral and oropharyngeal defects and coverage of alveolar ridge in the mandible.

DISCUSSION

In some situations, there is a need for more mucosal paddle, longer vascular pedicle and more adaptation to the recipient bed.

CONCLUSION

Relocating Stensen's duct increases the mucosal paddle with cranial extension of superior limit while differential incision of the mucosa and buccinator muscle in mandibular vestibule extend the lower limit of this flap. Bone suture is a good complementary technique when this flap is used for coverage of mandibular alveolar ridge. Inferiorly based BUMIF with added length is indicated for oropharyngeal and contralateral mouth floor reconstructions.

The evaluation of a scoring system in airway management after oral cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the usefulness of tracheostomy scoring system in the decision of postoperative airway management in oral cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 104 patients were reviewed in this retrospective study, who underwent radical resection with or without neck dissection and free flap reconstruction due to oral cancer. The patients were classified into three groups according to the timing of the extubation; extubated groups (n = 51), overnight intubation group (n = 45), and tracheostomy group (n = 8). Cameron's score was used to evaluate the relation between the state of the patient's airway and the type of the operation.

RESULTS

Tracheostomy was performed in eight patients (8/104, 7.7 %). A total of 22 patients (21.2 %) had more than 5 points of which 17 patients (77.3 %) did not have a tracheostomy and any postoperative emergency airway problems. The tracheostomy scores were significantly different among the three groups. Hospital stay showed a significant correlation with the tracheostomy score.

CONCLUSIONS

The scoring system did not quite agree with the airway management of the authors' clinic; however, it can be one of the clinical factors predicting the degree of the postoperative airway obstruction and surgical aggressiveness for recovery. The further studies are needed for clinically more reliable scoring systems.

Elective tracheostomy scoring system for severe oral disease patients

Objectives

The purpose of this research was to create a scoring system that provides comprehensive assessment of patients with oromaxillofacial cancer or odontogenic infection, and to statistically reevaluate the results in order to provide specific criteria for elective tracheostomy.

Materials and Methods

All patients that had oral cancer surgery (group A) or odontogenic infection surgery (group B) during a period of 10 years (2003 to 2013) were subgrouped according to whether or not the patient received a tracheostomy. After a random sampling (group A: total of 56, group B: total of 60), evaulation procedures were observed based on the group classifications. For group A, four factors were evaluated: TNM stage, reconstruction methods, presence of pathologic findings on chest posterior-anterior (PA), and the number of systemic diseases. Scores were given to each item based on the scoring system suggested in this research and the scores were added together. Similarly, the sum score of group B was counted using 5 categories, including infection site, C-reactive protein level on first visit, age, presence of pathologic findings on chest PA, and number of systemic diseases.

Results

The scoring system rendered from this research shows that there is a high correlation between the scores and TNM stage in oral cancer patients, or infection sites in odontogenic infection patients. However, no correlation between pathologic findings on chest PA could be found in either group. The results also indicated that for both groups, the hospital day increased with the tracheostomy score. The tracheostomy score cutoff value was 5 in oral cancer patients and 6 in odontogenic infection patients which was used for elective tracheostomy indication.

Conclusion

The elective tracheostomy score system suggested by this research is a method that considers both the surgical and general conditions of the patient, and can be very useful for managing patients with severe oral disease.

Perioperative assessment of the cancer patient

The perioperative evaluation of patients with cancer differs from that of other patients in that the former may have received prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy. These cancer treatments have a wide range of side effects and complications that may affect patients' perioperative risks. The perioperative specialist who evaluates the cancer patient prior to surgery must be familiar with the effects of these treatments and their consequences for the major organ systems. The perioperative specialist must also be familiar with the natural history of cancer and have a basic understanding of how cancer affects the body. In this article, we review the perioperative concerns that are specific to the patient with cancer.

Clinical features and short-term outcome of critically ill patients with head and neck cancer in the medical intensive care unit

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical features, especially cancer-related complications, and short-term outcome of critically ill patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) in the medical intensive care unit.

METHODS

We reviewed 57 patients with a diagnosis of HNC in the medical intensive care unit (≥ 24 hours) of a tertiary-care medical center between January 1999 and December 2005.

RESULTS

Thirty-two (56.1%) patients had advanced cancers (stage III/IV), and 21 (36.8%) remained uncontrolled (ie, relapsed or progressive). Twenty-five (43.9%) patients had cancer-related complications, including airway obstruction, tumor bleeding, or wound infection. Among 47 (82.4%) patients with acute respiratory failure, 25.5% of them were caused by cancer-related life-threatening airway complications. After excluding 5 already tracheostomized acute respiratory failure patients, difficult intubation was encountered in 26.2% (11/42); and 72.7% (8/11) of them required emergency tracheostomy. The 30-day mortality was 38.6%. Uncontrolled HNC (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-14.92) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (adjusted OR 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.22) were found as the risk factors for 30-day mortality in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although critically ill patients with HNC usually had advanced cancers and carried a high rate of cancer-related life-threatening airway complications, their 30-day mortality was favorable and only independently associated with cancer status and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score.

Evaluation of the Bonfils intubating fibrescope for predicted difficult intubation in awake patients with ear, nose and throat cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Anaesthesiologists are regularly faced with difficult tracheal intubation. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of tracheal intubation with the Bonfils intubating fibrescope in awake adult patients with predicted difficult intubation undergoing cancer surgery in an ear, nose and throat unit.

METHODS

Intubation was performed under local anaesthesia and remifentanil sedation with spontaneous ventilation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of intubations which met the following quality requirements: successful intubation (≤ 2 attempts and duration <180 s) and good tolerability (Fahey scale <2). Secondary endpoints included the operational problems encountered and patients' perception of the procedure immediately and 7 days after the intervention. Using a one-stage Fleming design, 32 patients were required to complete the study. Forty-one eligible adult patients were enrolled.

RESULTS

Between February 2008 and March 2009, the primary endpoint could be evaluated in 33 patients. Quality requirements were met in 26 patients (78.8%) and not met in seven patients (five were intubated with the Bonfils fibrescope and two using another technique). Difficulties were reported in 13 patients (39.4%). Eighty-four percent of the patients had a good or very good perception of the intubation shortly after the procedure, and 91% after 7 days.

CONCLUSION

Tracheal intubation using the Bonfils intubating fibrescope was successful in almost all patients (93.9%). The 78.8% incidence of interventions which met the quality requirements is high in the context of ear, nose and throat cancer and acceptable in current clinical practice. In ear, nose and throat cancer patients who do not require nasopharyngeal intubation and in whom orotracheal intubation is predicted to be difficult, the use of the Bonfils intubating fibrescope is safe, effective and well tolerated.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01070537, URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01070537?term=bonfils&rank=2.

Fibre-optic intubation teaching in sedated patients with anticipated difficult intubation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to assess the safety of training fibre-optic intubation performed under propofol light general anaesthesia in patients with an anticipated difficult intubation.

METHODS

Patients with ear, nose and throat cancer having at least two criteria for anticipated difficult intubation and scheduled for fibre-optic intubation were included prospectively. In 26 patients, intubation was performed by an anaesthesia resident (under senior supervision), whereas in 20 patients, it was performed by a senior anaesthesiologist. All patients received propofol light general anaesthesia adjusted to maintain both loss of consciousness and spontaneous ventilation.

RESULTS

Of the 46 patients, 45 had successful fibre-optic intubation, and one needed a rescue procedure because of hypoxaemia. Residents failed to intubate four patients, who were easily intubated by the senior. Episodic hypoxaemia (SPO2 < 90%) occurred in three patients in each group. No statistically significant difference was found between junior and senior neither on the duration of the procedure (9.3 +/- 4.9 vs. 7.5 +/- 4.0 min) nor on the propofol consumption (197 +/- 130 vs. 193 +/- 103 mg) or the ETCO2 at the end of the procedure (36 +/- 6 vs. 38 +/- 6 mmHg), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Teaching fibre-optic tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult intubation and sedated with propofol did not increase morbidity significantly compared with an experienced anaesthesiologist. Fibre-optic intubation under propofol light general anaesthesia could be safely performed by a resident as long as a senior anaesthesiologist is permanently present, spontaneous ventilation is maintained and a rescue oxygenation technique is immediately available.