Imperfect Solutions to the Neoliberal Problem of Public Aging: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Public Narratives of Long-Term Residential Care

Exploring space and practices of control in long-term residential care violence prevention strategies

Long-term residential care (LTRC) should be a safe place to work and to live, but it can be a site of violent situations for older people and staff. In this article, we draw on critical geographies, aging, and violence research to analyze how staff perceive, manage, and control the risk of violence in LTRC. Specifically, we explore the role of space as an instrument of control in places of care; the language of risk and risk containment in these places; and how movement figures into management of the risk of violence. Data included telephone and web-based semi-structured interviews with 29 staff in two Canadian provinces from 2021 to 2023, which were analyzed inductively. LTRC staff described having access to and support from other staff as an important feature of safe places. They also emphasized visibility, opportunities to escape from violent or threatening situations, being cognizant of objects that may be used as weapons and moving some residents to other tables, rooms, or specialized units. Finally, some staff acknowledged tensions between person-centered care and protecting staff and resident safety. Our analysis raises concerns about whether the management of space, objects, and activities employed to promote safety contribute to the care and dignity of older people. By drawing attention to the role of space, place, and risk containment in managing violent situations, we illustrate the important contributions of critical geography in troubling institutional care for older people.

Cumulative Disempowerment: How Families Experience Older Adults' Transitions into Long-Term Residential Care

Although emerging research links family experiences with long-term residential care (LTRC) transitions to structural features of health care systems, existing scholarship inadvertently tends to represent the transition as an individual problem to which families need to adjust. This secondary qualitative analysis of 55 interviews with 22 family members caring for an older adult engages a critical gerontological lens. A concept of cumulative, structural empowerment informs this analysis of families' experiences across a broad continuum of older adults' moves into LTRC. Leading up to transitions, families have little power over home care services, and family members have little control over their involvement in care provision. Some families respond by making choices to refuse publicly provided service options, therein both resisting and reinforcing broader relations of power. Expectations for family involvement in LTRC placement decisions were incongruent with some families' experiences, reinforcing a sense of powerlessness compounded by the speed with which these decisions needed to be made. A broad temporal analysis of transitions highlights LTRC transitions as a process of cumulative family disempowerment connected to broader formal care structures alongside emphases on aging in place and familialism that characterize LTRC as the option of last resort.

The False Economy of Seeking to Eliminate Delayed Transfers of Care: Some Lessons from Queueing Theory

BACKGROUND

It is a stated ambition of many healthcare systems to eliminate delayed transfers of care (DTOCs) between acute and step-down community services.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to demonstrate how, counter to intuition, pursual of such a policy is likely to be uneconomical, as it would require large amounts of community capacity to accommodate even the rarest of demand peaks, leaving much capacity unused for much of the time.

METHODS

Some standard results from queueing theory-a mathematical discipline for considering the dynamics of queues and queueing systems-are used to provide a model of patient flow from the acute to community setting. While queueing models have a track record of application in healthcare, they have not before been used to address this question.

RESULTS

Results show that 'eliminating' DTOCs is a false economy: the additional community costs required are greater than the possible acute cost saving. While a substantial proportion of DTOCs can be attributed to inefficient use of resources, the remainder can be considered economically essential to ensuring cost-efficient service operation. For England's National Health Service (NHS), our modelling estimates annual cost savings of £117m if DTOCs are reduced to the 12% of current levels that can be regarded as economically essential.

CONCLUSION

This study discourages the use of 'zero DTOC' targets and instead supports an assessment based on the specific characteristics of the healthcare system considered.

Palliative Care, Intimacy, and Sexual Expression in the Older Adult Residential Care Context: "Living until You Don't"

Commonly, frail older adults move to residential care, a liminal space that is their home, sometimes a place of death, and a workplace. Residential facilities typically espouse person-centred values, which are variably interpreted. A critical approach to person-centred care that focuses on social citizenship begins to address issues endemic in diminishing opportunities for intimacy in the end-of-life residential context: risk-averse policies; limited education; ageism; and environments designed for staff convenience. A person-centred approach to residents' expressions of intimacy and sexuality can be supported throughout end-of-life care. The present study utilised a constructionist methodology to investigate meanings associated with intimacy in the palliative and end-of-life care context. There were 77 participants, including residents, family members and staff, from 35 residential facilities. Analysis identified four key themes: care home ethos and intimacy; everyday touch as intimacy; ephemeral intimacy; and intimacy mediated by the built environment. Residents' expressions of intimacy and sexuality are supported in facilities where clinical leaders provide a role-model for a commitment to social citizenship. Ageism, restrictive policies, care-rationing, functional care, and environmental hindrances contribute to limited intimacy and social death. Clinical leaders have a pivotal role in ensuring person-centred care through policies and practice that support residents' intimate reciprocity.