Dual actions of isthmic input to tectal neurons in a reptile, Gekko gekko

Current source density analysis of contra- and ipsilateral isthmotectal connections of the frog

The nucleus isthmi (NI) of the frog receives input from the ipsilateral optic tectum and projects back to both optic tecta. After ablation of NI, frogs display no visually elicited prey-catching or threat avoidance behavior. Neural mechanisms that underlie the loss of such important behavior have not been solved. Electrophysiological examination of the contralateral isthmotectal projection has proved that it contributes to binocular vision. On the other hand, there are very few physiological investigations of the ipsilateral isthmotectal projection. In this study, current source density (CSD) analysis was applied to contra- and ipsilateral isthmotectal projections. The contralateral projection produced monosynaptic sinks in superficial layers and in layer 8. The results confirmed former findings obtained by single unit recordings. The ipsilateral projection elicited a prominent monosynaptic sink in layer 8. Recipient neurons were located in layers 6–7. These results, combined with those from the former intracellular study, led to the following neuronal circuit. Afferents from the ipsilateral NI inhibit non-efferent pear shaped neurons in the superficial layers, and strongly excite large ganglionic neurons projecting to the descending motor regions. Thus feedback to the output neurons strengthens the visually elicited responses.

Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Subtypes Involved in Facilitation of GABAergic Inhibition in Mouse Superficial Superior Colliculus

The superficial superior colliculus (sSC) is a key station in the sensory processing related to visual salience. The sSC receives cholinergic projections from the parabigeminal nucleus, and previous studies have revealed the presence of several different nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunits in the sSC. In this study, to clarify the role of the cholinergic inputs to the sSC, we examined current responses induced by ACh in GABAergic and non-GABAergic sSC neurons using in vitro slice preparations obtained from glutamate decarboxylase 67-green fluorescent protein (GFP) knock-in mice in which GFP is specifically expressed in GABAergic neurons. Brief air pressure application of acetylcholine (ACh) elicited nicotinic inward current responses in both GABAergic and non-GABAergic neurons. The inward current responses in the GABAergic neurons were highly sensitive to a selective antagonist for α3β2- and α6β2-containing receptors, α-conotoxin MII (αCtxMII). A subset of these neurons exhibited a faster α-bungarotoxin-sensitive inward current component, indicating the expression of α7-containing nAChRs. We also found that the activation of presynaptic nAChRs induced release of GABA, which elicited a burst of miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents mediated by GABAA receptors in non-GABAergic neurons. This ACh-induced GABA release was mediated mainly by αCtxMII-sensitive nAChRs and resulted from the activation of voltage-dependent calcium channels. Morphological analysis revealed that recorded GFP-positive neurons are interneurons and GFP-negative neurons include projection neurons. These findings suggest that nAChRs are involved in the regulation of GABAergic inhibition and modulate visual processing in the sSC.

The nucleus isthmi and dual modulation of the receptive field of tectal neurons in non-mammals

The nucleus isthmi in the dorsolateral tegmentum had been one of the most obscure structures in the nonmammalian midbrain for eight decades. Recent studies have shown that this nucleus and its mammalian homologue, the parabigeminal nucleus, are all visual centers, which receive information from the ipsilateral tectum and project back either ipsilaterally or bilaterally depending on species, but not an auditory center as suggested before. On the other hand, the isthmotectal pathways exert dual, both excitatory and inhibitory, actions on tectal cells in amphibians and reptiles. In birds, the magnocellular and parvocellular subdivisions of this nucleus produce excitatory and inhibitory effects on tectal cells, respectively. The excitatory pathway is mediated by glutamatergic synapses with AMPA and NMDA receptors and/or cholinergic synapses with muscarinic receptors, whereas the inhibitory pathway is mediated by GABAergic synapses via GABA(A) receptors. Further studies have shown that the magnocellular and parvocellular subdivisions can differentially modulate the excitatory and inhibitory regions of the receptive field of tectal neurons, respectively. Both the positive and the negative feedback pathways may work together in a winner-take-all manner, so that the animal could attend to only one of several competing visual targets simultaneously present in the visual field. Some behavioral tests seem to be consistent with this hypothesis. The present review indicates that the tecto-isthmic system in birds is an excellent model for further studying tectal modulation and possibly winner-take-all mechanisms.

Receptive field organization and response properties of visual neurons in the pigeon nucleus semilunaris

The present study provides the first electrophysiological evidence that the nucleus semilunaris is a visual center in the pigeon midbrain. The receptive field of E-type cells is either an excitatory field alone or an excitatory center with an inhibitory periphery, which in most cases is surrounded by a disinhibitory region. Cells of I-type possess only an inhibitory receptive field. Semilunar cells are selective for fast (80-160 degrees /s), intermediate (40 degrees /s) and slow (10-20 degrees /s) velocities of motion, with directional cells mainly preferring forward and downward motion. About 40% of cells prefer a white stimulus moving against a black background, and 60% of cells prefer a black stimulus against a white background. The physiological significance of these properties is discussed.