Protein Conformational Gate Controlling Binding Site Preference and Migration for Ubiquinone-B in the Photosynthetic Reaction Center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Photosynthetic diode: electron transport rectification by wetting the quinone cofactor

We report 11 μs of molecular dynamics simulations of the electron-transfer reaction between primary and secondary quinone cofactors in the bacterial reaction center. The main question addressed here is the mechanistic reason for unidirectional electron transfer between chemically identical cofactors. We find that electron is trapped at the secondary quinone by wetting of the protein pocket following electron transfer on the time-scale shorter than the backward transition. This mechanism provides effective rectification of the electron transport, making the reaction center a molecular diode operating by cyclic charge-induced electrowetting.

The Unusually Strong Hydrogen Bond between the Carbonyl of QAand His M219 in theRhodobacter sphaeroidesReaction Center Is Not Essential for Efficient Electron Transfer from QA-to QB

In native reaction centers (RCs) from photosynthetic purple bacteria the primary quinone (QA) and the secondary quinone (QB) are interconnected via a specific His-Fe-His bridge. In Rhodobacter sphaeroides RCs the C4=O carbonyl of QA forms a very strong hydrogen bond with the protonated Npi of His M219, and the Ntau of this residue is in turn coordinated to the non-heme iron atom. The second carbonyl of QA is engaged in a much weaker hydrogen bond with the backbone N-H of Ala M260. In previous work, a Trp side chain was introduced by site-directed mutagenesis at the M260 position in the RC of Rb. sphaeroides, resulting in a complex that is completely devoid of QA and therefore nonfunctional. A photochemically competent derivative of the AM260W mutant was isolated that contains a Cys side chain at the M260 position (denoted AM260(W-->C)). In the present work, the interactions between the carbonyl groups of QA and the protein in the AM260(W-->C) suppressor mutant have been characterized by light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy of the photoreduction of QA. The QA-/QA difference spectrum demonstrates that the strong interaction between the C4=O carbonyl of QA and His M219 is lost in the mutant, and the coupled CO and CC modes of the QA- semiquinone are also strongly perturbed. In parallel, a band assigned to the perturbation of the C5-Ntau mode of His M219 upon QA- formation in the native RC is lacking in the spectrum of the mutant. Furthermore, a positive band between 2900 and 2400 cm-1 that is related to protons fluctuating within a network of highly polarizable hydrogen bonds in the native RC is reduced in amplitude in the mutant. On the other hand, the QB-/QB FTIR difference spectrum is essentially the same as for the native RC. The kinetics of electron transfer from QA- to QB were measured by the flash-induced absorption changes at 780 nm. Compared to native RCs the absorption transients are slowed by a factor of about 2 for both the slow phase (in the hundreds of microseconds range) and fast phase (microseconds to tens of microseconds range) in AM260(W-->C) RCs. We conclude that the unusually strong hydrogen bond between the carbonyl of QA and His M219 in the Rb. sphaeroides RC is not obligatory for efficient electron transfer from QA- to QB.

pH modulates the quinone position in the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides in the neutral and charge separated states

The structure of the photosynthetic reaction-center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides has been determined at four different pH values (6.5, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0) in the neutral and in charge separated states. At pH 8.0, in the neutral state, we obtain a resolution of 1.87 A, which is the best ever reported for the bacterial reaction center protein. Our crystallographic data confirm the existence of two different binding positions of the secondary quinone (QB). We observe a new orientation of QB in its distal position, which shows no ring-flip compared to the orientation in the proximal position. Datasets collected for the different pH values show a pH-dependence of the population of the proximal position. The new orientation of QB in the distal position and the pH-dependence could be confirmed by continuum electrostatics calculations. Our calculations are in agreement with the experimentally observed proton uptake upon charge separation. The high resolution of our crystallographic data allows us to identify new water molecules and external residues being involved in two previously described hydrogen bond proton channels. These extended proton-transfer pathways, ending at either of the two oxo-groups of QB in its proximal position, provide additional evidence that ring-flipping is not required for complete protonation of QB upon reduction.

Monitoring the pH Dependence of IR Carboxylic Acid Signals upon QB- Formation in the Glu-L212 → Asp/Asp-L213 → Glu Swap Mutant Reaction Center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

In the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from the purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, proton-coupled electron-transfer reactions occur at the secondary quinone (QB) site. Involved in the proton uptake steps are carboxylic acids, which have characteristic infrared vibrations in the 1770-1700 cm-1 spectral range that are sensitive to 1H/2H isotopic exchange. With respect to the native RC, a novel protonation pattern for carboxylic acids upon QB photoreduction has been identified in the Glu-L212 --> Asp/Asp-L213 --> Glu mutant RC using light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy (Nabedryk, E., Breton, J., Okamura, M. Y., and Paddock, M. L. (2004) Biochemistry 43, 7236-7243). These carboxylic acids are structurally close and have been implicated in proton transfer to reduced QB. In this work, we extend previous studies by measuring the pH dependence of the QB-/QB FTIR difference spectra of the mutant in 1H2O and 2H2O. Large pH dependent changes were observed in the 1770-1700 cm-1 spectral range between pH 8 and pH 4. The IR fingerprints of the protonating carboxylic acids upon QB- formation were obtained from the calculated double-difference spectra 1H2O minus 2H2O. These IR fingerprints are specific for each pH, indicative of the contribution of different titrating groups. In particular, the 1752 cm-1 signal indicates that Glu-L213 protonates upon QB- formation at pH >or= 5, whereas the 1746 cm-1 signal indicates protonation of Asp-L212 even at pH 4. An unidentified carboxylic acid absorbing at approximately 1765 cm-1 could be the proton donor between pH 8 and 5. The observation that in the swap mutant there are several uniquely behaving carboxylic acids shows that electrostatic interactions occurring between them are sufficiently modified from the native RC to reveal their IR signatures.

Factors influencing the energetics of electron and proton transfers in proteins. What can be learned from calculations

A protein structure should provide the information needed to understand its observed properties. Significant progress has been made in developing accurate calculations of acid/base and oxidation/reduction reactions in proteins. Current methods and their strengths and weaknesses are discussed. The distribution and calculated ionization states in a survey of proteins is described, showing that a significant minority of acidic and basic residues are buried in the protein and that most of these remain ionized. The electrochemistry of heme and quinones are considered. Proton transfers in bacteriorhodopsin and coupled electron and proton transfers in photosynthetic reaction centers, 5-coordinate heme binding proteins and cytochrome c oxidase are highlighted as systems where calculations have provided insight into the reaction mechanism.

Ubiquinol oxidation in the cytochrome bc1 complex: Reaction mechanism and prevention of short-circuiting

This review is focused on the mechanism of ubiquinol oxidation by the cytochrome bc1 complex (bc1). This integral membrane complex serves as a "hub" in the vast majority of electron transfer chains. The bc1 oxidizes a ubiquinol molecule to ubiquinone by a unique "bifurcated" reaction where the two released electrons go to different acceptors: one is accepted by the mobile redox active domain of the [2Fe-2S] iron-sulfur Rieske protein (FeS protein) and the other goes to cytochrome b. The nature of intermediates in this reaction remains unclear. It is also debatable how the enzyme prevents short-circuiting that could happen if both electrons escape to the FeS protein. Here, I consider a reaction mechanism that (i) agrees with the available experimental data, (ii) entails three traits preventing the short-circuiting in bc1, and (iii) exploits the evident structural similarity of the ubiquinone binding sites in the bc1 and the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (RC). Based on the latter congruence, it is suggested that the reaction route of ubiquinol oxidation by bc1 is a reversal of that leading to the ubiquinol formation in the RC. The rate-limiting step of ubiquinol oxidation is then the re-location of a ubiquinol molecule from its stand-by site within cytochrome b into a catalytic site, which is formed only transiently, after docking of the mobile redox domain of the FeS protein to cytochrome b. In the catalytic site, the quinone ring is stabilized by Glu-272 of cytochrome b and His-161 of the FeS protein. The short circuiting is prevented as long as: (i) the formed semiquinone anion remains bound to the reduced FeS domain and impedes its undocking, so that the second electron is forced to go to cytochrome b; (ii) even after ubiquinol is fully oxidized, the reduced FeS domain remains docked to cytochrome b until electron(s) pass through cytochrome b; (iii) if cytochrome b becomes (over)reduced, the binding and oxidation of further ubiquinol molecules is hampered; the reason is that the Glu-272 residue is turned towards the reduced hemes of cytochrome b and is protonated to stabilize the surplus negative charge; in this state, this residue cannot participate in the binding/stabilization of a ubiquinol molecule.

Internal dynamics and protein–matrix coupling in trehalose-coated proteins

We review recent studies on the role played by non-liquid, water-containing matrices on the dynamics and structure of embedded proteins. Two proteins were studied, in water-trehalose matrices: a water-soluble protein (carboxy derivative of horse heart myoglobin) and a membrane protein (reaction centre from Rhodobacter sphaeroides). Several experimental techniques were used: Mossbauer spectroscopy, elastic neutron scattering, FTIR spectroscopy, CO recombination after flash photolysis in carboxy-myoglobin, kinetic optical absorption spectroscopy following pulsed and continuous photoexcitation in Q(B) containing or Q(B) deprived reaction centre from R. sphaeroides. Experimental results, together with the outcome of molecular dynamics simulations, concurred to give a picture of how water-containing matrices control the internal dynamics of the embedded proteins. This occurs, in particular, via the formation of hydrogen bond networks that anchor the protein surface to the surrounding matrix, whose stiffness increases by lowering the sample water content. In the conclusion section, we also briefly speculate on how the protein-matrix interactions observed in our samples may shed light on the protein-solvent coupling also in liquid aqueous solutions.

Energetics of Quinone-Dependent Electron and Proton Transfers in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Photosynthetic Reaction Centers

Proteins bind redox cofactors, modifying their electrochemistry and affinity by specific interactions of the binding site with each cofactor redox state. Photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides have three ubiquinone-binding sites, Q(A), and proximal and distal Q(B) sites. Ubiquinones, which can be doubly reduced and bind 2 protons, have 9 redox states. However, only Q and Q(-) are seen in the Q(A) site and Q, Q(-), and QH(2) in the proximal Q(B) site. The distal Q(B) function is uncertain. Multiple conformation continuum electrostatics (MCCE) was used to compare the ubiquinone electrochemical midpoints (E(m)) and pK(a) values at these three sites. At pH 7, the Q(A)/Q(A)(-) E(m) is -40 mV and proximal Q(B)/Q(B)(-) -10 mV in agreement with the experimental values (assuming a solution ubiquinone E(m) of -145 mV). Q(B) reduction requires changes in nearby residue protonation and SerL223 reorientation. The distal Q(B)/Q(B)(-) E(m) is a much more unfavorable -260 mV. Q(A) and proximal Q(B) sites generally stabilize species with a -1 charge, while the distal Q(B) site prefers binding neutral species. In each site, the dianion is destabilized because favorable interactions with the residues and backbone increase with charge (q), while the unfavorable loss of solvation energy increases with q(2). Therefore, proton binding before a second reduction, forming QH and then QH(-), is always preferred to forming the dianion (Q(-)(2)). The final product QH(2) is higher in energy at the proximal Q(B) site than in solution; therefore, it binds poorly, favoring release. In contrast, QH(2) binds more tightly than Q at the distal Q(B) site.

Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations and g-Tensor Calculations of Aqueous Benzosemiquinone Radical Anion: Effects of Regular and “T-Stacked” Hydrogen Bonds

Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics (CP-MD) simulations of the benzosemiquinone radical anion in aqueous solution have been performed at ambient conditions. Analysis of the trajectory shows not only extensive hydrogen bonding to the carbonyl oxygen atoms (ca. 4-5.6 water molecules depending on distance criteria), but also relatively long-lived "T-stacked" hydrogen bonds to the semiquinone pi-system. These results are discussed in the context of recent findings on semiquinone-protein interactions in photosynthetic reaction centers, and of EPR and vibration spectroscopical data for the aqueous system. Snapshots from the CP-MD trajectory are used for the first quantum chemical analyses of dynamical effects on electronic g-tensors, using cluster models and a recently developed density functional method. In particular, the effects of intermolecular hydrogen-bond dynamics on the g-tensor components are examined, in comparison with recent EPR and ENDOR studies.

Residual water modulates QA- -to-QB electron transfer in bacterial reaction centers embedded in trehalose amorphous matrices

The role of protein dynamics in the electron transfer from the reduced primary quinone, Q(A)(-), to the secondary quinone, Q(B), was studied at room temperature in isolated reaction centers (RC) from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides by incorporating the protein in trehalose water systems of different trehalose/water ratios. The effects of dehydration on the reaction kinetics were examined by analyzing charge recombination after different regimes of RC photoexcitation (single laser pulse, double flash, and continuous light) as well as by monitoring flash-induced electrochromic effects in the near infrared spectral region. Independent approaches show that dehydration of RC-containing matrices causes reversible, inhomogeneous inhibition of Q(A)(-)-to-Q(B) electron transfer, involving two subpopulations of RCs. In one of these populations (i.e., active), the electron transfer to Q(B) is slowed but still successfully competing with P(+)Q(A)(-) recombination, even in the driest samples; in the other (i.e., inactive), electron transfer to Q(B) after a laser pulse is hindered, inasmuch as only recombination of the P(+)Q(A)(-) state is observed. Small residual water variations ( approximately 7 wt %) modulate fully the relative fraction of the two populations, with the active one decreasing to zero in the driest samples. Analysis of charge recombination after continuous illumination indicates that, in the inactive subpopulation, the conformational changes that rate-limit electron transfer can be slowed by >4 orders of magnitude. The reported effects are consistent with conformational gating of the reaction and demonstrate that the conformational dynamics controlling electron transfer to Q(B) is strongly enslaved to the structure and dynamics of the surrounding medium. Comparing the effects of dehydration on P(+)Q(A)(-)-->PQ(A) recombination and Q(A)(-)Q(B)-->Q(A)Q(B)(-) electron transfer suggests that conformational changes gating the latter process are distinct from those stabilizing the primary charge-separated state.

Characterization of the bonding interactions of QB upon photoreduction via A-branch or B-branch electron transfer in mutant reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

In Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers (RCs) containing the mutation Ala M260 to Trp (AM260W), transmembrane electron transfer along the full-length of the A-branch of cofactors is prevented by the loss of the Q(A) ubiquinone, but it is possible to generate the radical pair P(+)H(A)(-) by A-branch electron transfer or the radical pair P(+)Q(B)(-) by B-branch electron transfer. In the present study, FTIR spectroscopy was used to provide direct evidence for the complete absence of the Q(A) ubiquinone in mutant RCs with the AM260W mutation. Light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy of isolated RCs was also used to probe the neutral Q(B) and the semiquinone Q(B)(-) states in two B-branch active mutants, a double AM260W-LM214H mutant, denoted WH, and a quadruple mutant, denoted WAAH, in which the AM260W, LM214H, and EL212A-DL213A mutations were combined. The data were compared to those obtained with wild-type (Wt) RCs and the double EL212A-DL213A (denoted AA) mutant which exhibit the usual A-branch electron transfer to Q(B). The Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectrum of the WH mutant is very close to that of Wt RCs indicating similar bonding interactions of Q(B) and Q(B)(-) with the protein in both RCs. The Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectra of the AA and WAAH mutants are also closely related to one another, but are very different to that of the Wt complex. Isotope-edited IR fingerprint spectra were obtained for the AA and WAAH mutants reconstituted with site-specific (13)C-labeled ubiquinone. Whilst perturbations of the interactions of the semiquinone Q(B)(-) with the protein are observed in the AA and WAAH mutants, the FTIR data show that the bonding interaction of neutral Q(B) in these two mutants are essentially the same as those for Wt RCs. Therefore, it is concluded that Q(B) occupies the same binding position proximal to the non-heme iron prior to reduction by either A-branch or B-branch electron transfer.

Identification of a Novel Protonation Pattern for Carboxylic Acids upon QB Photoreduction in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Reaction Center Mutants at Asp-L213 and Glu-L212 Sites

In the reaction center from the photosynthetic purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, light energy is rapidly converted to chemical energy through coupled electron-proton transfer to a buried quinone molecule Q(B). Involved in the proton uptake steps are carboxylic acids, which have characteristic infrared vibrations that are observable using light-induced Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectroscopy. Upon formation, Q(B)(-) induces protonation of Glu-L212, located within 5 A of Q(B), resulting in a IR signal at 1728 cm(-1). However, no other IR signal is observed within the classic absorption range of protonated carboxylic acids (1770-1700 cm(-1)). In particular, no signal for Asp-L213 is found despite its juxtaposition to Q(B) and importance for proton uptake on the second electron-transfer step. In an attempt to uncover the reason behind this lack of signal, the microscopic electrostatic environment in the vicinity of Q(B) was modified by interchanging Asp and Glu at the L213 and L212 positions. The Q(B)(-)/Q(B) FTIR spectrum of the Asp-L212/Glu-L213 swap mutant in the 1770-1700 cm(-1) range shows several distinct new signals, which are sensitive to (1)H/(2)H isotopic exchange, indicating that the reduction of Q(B) results in the change of the protonation state of several carboxylic acids. The new bands at 1752 and 1747 cm(-1) were assigned to an increase of protonation in response to Q(B) reduction of Glu-L213 and Asp-L212, respectively, based on the effect of replacing them with their amine analogues. Since other carboxylic acid signals were observed, it is concluded that the swap mutations at L212 and L213 affect a cluster of carboxylic acids larger than the L212/L213 acid pair. Implications for the native reaction center are discussed.

Time-resolved crystallographic studies of light-induced structural changes in the photosynthetic reaction center

Light-induced structural changes in the bacterial reaction center were studied by a time-resolved crystallographic experiment. Crystals of protein from Blastochloris viridis (formerly Rhodopseudomonas viridis) were reconstituted with ubiquinone and analyzed by monochromatic and Laue diffraction, in the dark and 3 ms after illuminating the crystal with a pulsed laser (630 nm, 3 mJ/pulse, 7 ns duration). Refinement of monochromatic data shows that ubiquinone binds only in the "proximal" Q(B) binding site. No significant structural difference was observed between the light and dark datasets; in particular, no quinone motion was detected. This result may be reconciled with previous studies by postulating equilibration of the "distal" and "proximal" binding sites upon extended dark adaption, and in which movement of ubiquinone is not the conformational gate for the first electron transfer between Q(A) and Q(B).

Absence of Large-Scale Displacement of Quinone QB in Bacterial Photosynthetic Reaction Centers

Photosynthesis transforms light into chemical energy by coupling electron transfer to proton uptake at the quinone Q(B). The possibility of initiating this process with a brief pulse of light and the known X-ray structure makes the photosynthetic bacterial reaction center a paradigm for studying coupled electron-proton transfer in biology. It has been established that electron transfer from the primary quinone Q(A) to Q(B) is gated by a protein conformational change. On the basis of a dramatic difference in the location of Q(B) in structures derived from crystals cooled to 90 K either under illumination or in the dark, a functional model for the gating mechanism was proposed whereby neutral Q(B) moves 4.5 A before receiving the electron from Q(A)(-) [Stowell, M. H. B., McPhillips, T. M., Rees, D. C., Soltis, S. M., Abresch, E., and Feher, G. (1997) Science 276, 812-816]. Isotope-edited FTIR difference spectroscopy of Q(B) photoreduction at 290 and 85 K is used to investigate whether Q(B) moves upon reduction. We show that the specific interactions of the carbonyl groups of Q(B) and Q(B)(-) with the protein at a single binding site remain identical at both temperatures. Therefore, the different locations of Q(B) reported in many X-ray crystal structures probably are unrelated to functional electron transfer from Q(A)(-) to Q(B).

Length, time, and energy scales of photosystems

The design of photosynthetic systems reflects the length scales of the fundamental physical processes. Energy transfer is rapid at the few angstrom scale and continues to be rapid even at the 50-A scale of the membrane thickness. Electron tunneling is nearly as rapid at the shortest distances, but becomes physiologically too slow well before 20 A. Diffusion, which starts out at a relatively slow nanosecond time scale, has the most modest slowing with distance and is physiologically competent at all biologically relevant distances. Proton transfer always operates on the shortest angstrom scale. The structural consequences of these distance dependencies are that energy transfer networks can extend over large, multisubunit and multicomplex distances and take leaps of 20 A before entering the domain of charge separating centers. Electron transfer systems are effectively limited to individual distances of 15 A or less and span the 50 A dimensions of the bioenergetic membrane by use of redox chains. Diffusion processes are generally used to cover the intercomplex electron transfer distances of 50 A and greater and tend to compensate for the lack of directionality by restricting the diffusional space to the membrane or the membrane surface, and by multiplying the diffusing species through the use of pools. Proton transfer reactions act over distances larger than a few angstroms through the use of clusters or relays, which sometimes rely on water molecules and which may only be dynamically assembled. Proteins appear to place a premium on robustness of design, which is relatively easily achieved in the long-distance physical processes of energy transfer and electron tunneling. By placing cofactors close enough, the physical process is relatively rapid compared to decay processes. Thus suboptimal conditions such as cofactor orientation, energy level, or redox potential level can be tolerated and generally do not have to be finely tuned. The most fragile regions of design tend to come in areas of complex formation and catalysis involving proton management, where relatively small changes in distance or mutations can lead to a dramatic decrease in turnover, which may already be limiting the overall speed of energy conversion in these proteins. Light-activated systems also face a challenge to robust function from the ever-present dangers of high redox potential chemistry. This can turn the protein matrix and wandering oxygen molecules into unintentional redox partners, which in the case of PSII requires the frequent, costly replacement of protein subunits.

Metalloprotein association, self-association, and dynamics governed by hydrophobic interactions: simultaneous occurrence of gated and true electron-transfer reactions between cytochrome f and cytochrome c(6) from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

Noninvasive reconstitution of the heme in cytochrome c(6) with zinc(II) ions allowed us to study the photoinduced electron-transfer reaction (3)Zncyt c(6) + cyt f(III) --> Zncyt c(6)(+) + cyt f(II) between physiological partners cytochrome c(6) and cytochrome f, both from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The reaction kinetics was analyzed in terms of protein docking and electron transfer. In contrast to various protein pairs studied before, both the unimolecular and the bimolecular reactions of this oxidative quenching take place at all ionic strengths from 2.5 through 700 mM. The respective intracomplex rate constants are k(uni) (1.2 +/- 0.1) x 10(4) s(-1) for persistent and k(bi) (9 +/- 4) x 10(2) s(-1) for the transient protein complex. The former reaction seems to be true electron transfer, and the latter seems to be electron transfer gated by a structural rearrangement. Remarkably, these reactions occur simultaneously, and both rate constants are invariant with ionic strength. The association constant K(a) for zinc cytochrome c(6) and cytochrome f(III) remains (5 +/- 3) x 10(5) M(-1) in the ionic strength range from 700 to 10 mM and then rises slightly to (7 +/- 2) x 10(6) M(-1), as ionic strength is lowered to 2.5 mM. Evidently, docking of these proteins from C. reinhardtii is due to hydrophobic interaction, slightly augmented by weak electrostatic attraction. Kinetics, chromatography, and cross-linking consistently show that cytochrome f self-dimerizes at ionic strengths of 200 mM and higher. Cytochrome f(III) quenches triplet state (3)Zncyt c(6), but its dimer does not. Formation of this unreactive dimer is an important step in the mechanism of electron transfer. Not only association between the reacting proteins, but also their self-association, should be considered when analyzing reaction mechanisms.

Quinone (Q(B)) binding site and protein stuctural changes in photosynthetic reaction center mutants at Pro-L209 revealed by vibrational spectroscopy

The effect of substituting Pro-L209 with Tyr, Phe, Glu, and Thr in photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides was investigated by monitoring the light-induced FTIR absorption changes associated with the photoreduction of the secondary quinone Q(B). Pro-L209 is close to a chain of ordered water molecules connecting Q(B) to the bulk phase. In wild-type RCs, two distinct main Q(B) binding sites (distal and proximal to the non-heme iron) have been described in the literature. The X-ray structures of the mutant RCs Pro-L209 --> Tyr, Pro-L209 --> Phe, and Pro-L209 --> Glu have revealed that Q(B) occupies a proximal, intermediate, and distal position, respectively [Kuglstatter, A., Ermler, U., Michel, H., Baciou, L., and Fritzsch, G. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 4253-4260]. FTIR absorption changes associated with the reduction of Q(B) in Pro-L209 --> Phe RCs reconstituted with (13)C-labeled ubiquinone show a highly specific IR fingerprint for the C=O and C=C modes of Q(B) upon selective labeling at C(1) or C(4). This IR fingerprint is similar to those of wild-type RCs and the Pro-L209 --> Tyr mutant [Breton, J., Boullais, C., Mioskowski, C., Sebban, P., Baciou, L., and Nabedryk, E. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 12921-12927], demonstrating that equivalent interactions occur between neutral Q(B) and the protein in wild-type and mutant RCs. It is concluded that in all RCs, neutral Q(B) in its functional state occupies a unique binding site which is favored to be the proximal site. This result contrasts with the multiple Q(B) binding sites found in crystal structures. With respect to wild-type RCs, the largest FTIR spectral changes upon Q(B)(-) formation are observed for the Phe-L209 and Tyr-L209 mutants which undergo similar protein structural changes and perturbations of the semiquinone modes. Smaller changes are observed for the Glu-L209 mutant, while the vibrational properties of the Thr-L209 mutant are essentially the same as those for native RCs.

The position of QB in the photosynthetic reaction center depends on pH: a theoretical analysis of the proton uptake upon QB reduction

Electrostatics-based calculations have been performed to examine the proton uptake upon reduction of the terminal electron acceptor Q(B) in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides as a function of pH and the associated conformational equilibrium. Two crystal structures of the reaction center were considered: one structure was determined in the dark and the other under illumination. In the two structures, the Q(B) was found in two different positions, proximal or distal to the nonheme iron. Because Q(B) was found mainly in the distal position in the dark and only in the proximal position under illumination, the two positions have been attributed mostly to the oxidized and the reduced forms of Q(B), respectively. We calculated the proton uptake upon Q(B) reduction by four different models. In the first model, Q(B) is allowed to equilibrate between the two positions with either oxidation state. This equilibrium was allowed to vary with pH. In the other three models the distribution of Q(B) between the proximal position and the distal position was pH-independent, with Q(B) occupying only the distal position or only the proximal position or populating the two positions with a fixed ratio. Only the first model, which includes the pH-dependent conformational equilibrium, reproduces both the experimentally measured pH dependence of the proton uptake and the crystallographically observed conformational equilibrium at pH 8. From this model, we find that Q(B) occupies only the distal position below pH 6.5 and only the proximal position above pH 9.0 in both oxidation states. Between these pH values both positions are partially occupied. The reduced Q(B) has a higher occupancy in the proximal position than the oxidized Q(B). In summary, the present results indicate that the conformational equilibrium of Q(B) depends not only on the redox state of Q(B), but also on the pH value of the solution.

Vibrational spectroscopy favors a unique QB binding site at the proximal position in wild-type reaction centers and in the Pro-L209 --> Tyr mutant from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

In the various X-ray structures of native reaction centers (RCs) from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, two distinct main binding sites (distal and proximal) for the secondary quinone Q(B) have been described in the literature. The movement of Q(B) from its distal to proximal position has been proposed to account for the conformational gate limiting the rate of the first electron transfer from the primary quinone Q(A-) to Q(B). Recently, Q(B) was found to bind in the proximal binding site in the dark-adapted crystals of a mutant RC where Pro-L209 was changed to Tyr [Kuglstatter, A., Ermler, U., Michel, H., Baciou, L., and Fritzsch, G. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 4253-4260]. To test the structural and functional implications of the distal and proximal sites, a comparison of the FTIR vibrational properties of Q(B) in native RCs and in the Pro-L209 --> Tyr mutant was performed. Light-induced FTIR absorption changes associated with the reduction of Q(B) in Pro-L209 --> Tyr RCs reconstituted with 13C-labeled ubiquinone (Q3) at the 1 or 4 position show a highly specific IR fingerprint for the C=O and C=C modes of Q(B) upon selective labeling at C1 or C4. This IR fingerprint is very similar to that of native RCs, demonstrating that equivalent interactions occur between neutral Q(B) and the protein in native and mutant RCs. Consequently, Q(B) occupies the same binding site in all RCs. Since the FTIR data fit the description of Q(B) bonding interactions in the proximal site, it is therefore concluded that neutral Q(B) also binds to the proximal site in native functional RCs. The implication of these new results for the conformational gate of the first electron transfer to Q(B) is outlined.