Nanostructured Polyamide by Reactive Blending. 1. Effect of the Reactive Diblock Composition

Interfacial tension of reactive, liquid interfaces and its consequences

Dispersions of immiscible liquids, such as emulsions and polymer blends, are at the core of many industrial applications which makes the understanding of their properties (morphology, stability, etc.) of great interest. A wide range of these properties depend on interfacial phenomena, whose understanding is therefore of particular importance. The behaviour of interfacial tension in emulsions and polymer blends is well-understood - both theoretically and experimentally - in the case of non-reactive stabilization processes using pre-made surfactants. However, this description of the interfacial tension behaviour in reactive systems, where the stabilizing agents are created in-situ (and which is more efficient as a stabilization route for many systems), does not yet find a consensus among the community. In this review, we compare the different theories which have been developed for non-reactive and for reactive systems, and we discuss their ability to capture the behaviour found experimentally. Finally, we address the consequences of the reactive stabilization process both on the global emulsions or polymer blend morphologies and at the interfacial scale.

Manipulation of multiphase morphology in the reactive blending system OBC/PLA/EGMA

In recent years, biodegradable polymers derived from bioresources have received more and more attention.

PLLA microalloys versus PLLA nanoalloys: preparation, morphologies, and properties

Nanostructured polymer blends have attracted significant attention recently. In this paper, the poly(lactic acid) (PLLA)/ethylene-co-acrylic ester-co-glycidyl methacrylate (E-AE-GMA) rubber (80/20) nanoalloys and microalloys were fabricated by melt blending and the structure-property relationships of the prepared alloys were investigated. In the nanoalloys, the rubber domains are homogeneously dispersed in the PLLA matrix with the overall domain size of <100 nm. Such nanoalloys exhibit not only high transparency in the visible region, but also significantly improved ductility and impact strength, compared with neat PLLA. Moreover, the nanodomains in the PLLA matrix enhance the crystallization rate of PLLA drastically. The overall crystallization rate of the PLLA nanoalloy is even higher than that of the PLLA nucleated by talc. In contrast, the PLLA microalloy has a phase structure with the size of the rubber domains being in the micrometer to submicrometer scale. The microalloy is opaque and displays almost the same tensile strength and modulus as the nanoalloy, but much higher impact strength than the nanoalloy.