Hybrid classification of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction based on simplified Milwaukee criteria: effect of marginal serum liver and pancreas test elevations

Sphincter of Oddi Function and Risk Factors for Dysfunction

The sphincter of Oddi (SO) is a smooth muscle valve regulating the flow of biliary and pancreatic secretions into the duodenum, initially described in 1887 by the Italian anatomist, Ruggero Oddi. SO dysfunction (SOD) is a broad term referring to numerous biliary, pancreatic, and hepatic disorders resulting from spasms, strictures, and relaxation of this valve at inappropriate times. This review brings attention to various factors that may increase the risk of SOD, including but not limited to: cholecystectomy, opiates, and alcohol. Lack of proper recognition and treatment of SOD may be associated with clinical events, including pancreatitis and biliary symptoms with hepatic enzyme elevation. Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic approaches are discussed to help recognize, prevent, and treat SOD. Future studies are needed to assess the treatment benefit of agents such as calcium-channel blockers, glyceryl trinitrate, or tricyclic antidepressants in patients with SOD.

Review of idiopathic pancreatitis

Recent advances in understanding of pancreatitis and advances in technology have uncovered the veils of idiopathic pancreatitis to a point where a thorough history and judicious use of diagnostic techniques elucidate the cause in over 80% of cases. This review examines the multitude of etiologies of what were once labeled idiopathic pancreatitis and provides the current evidence on each. This review begins with a background review of the current epidemiology of idiopathic pancreatitis prior to discussion of various etiologies. Etiologies of medications, infections, toxins, autoimmune disorders, vascular causes, and anatomic and functional causes are explored in detail. We conclude with management of true idiopathic pancreatitis and a summary of the various etiologic agents. Throughout this review, areas of controversies are highlighted.

Predictors of outcomes after biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomy for sphincter of oddi dysfunction

BACKGROUND

There are few data on combined pancreatic and biliary sphincterotomy for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD), especially regarding clinical features that might predict outcomes. We sought to examine the relative importance of various clinical features and the presence or absence of objective biliary abnormalities in determining responses to endoscopic therapy.

METHODS

A cohort of consecutive patients with suspected SOD was treated with biliary sphincterotomy, with additional pancreatic sphincterotomy at initial or subsequent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography if there was abnormal pancreatic manometry in conjunction with pain refractory to biliary sphincterotomy, continuous pain, or a history of amylase elevation. Repeat intervention was offered until response was achieved or complete ablation of all treated sphincters was achieved. Response was assessed by patients using a 5-point Likert scale, and multivariate logistic regression analysis used to identify predictors of response.

RESULTS

Of 121 patients, 112 (92%) were female, 105 (87%) postcholecystectomy, and by modified Milwaukee biliary classification 18 (15%) were type I, 53 (44%) type II, and 50 (41%) type III. All patients underwent biliary sphincterotomy and 49 (40%) pancreatic sphincterotomy. Good or excellent response at final follow-up was reported by 83 (69%) of 121 patients, including 37 (61%) of 61 patients requiring repeated intervention. Response was not significantly different between biliary types I, II, and III. Patient characteristics (with adjusted odds ratios) that were significant predictors of poor response were normal pancreatic manometry (4.6), delayed gastric emptying (6.0), daily opioid use (4.0), and age <40 (2.7). Abnormal liver function tests or dilated bile duct were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

For the treatment of SOD incorporating pancreatic and biliary sphincterotomy, patient characteristics and pancreatic sphincter manometry may be more important predictors of outcome than the traditional classification based on liver chemistries and bile duct dilation.

Improved predictors of outcome in postcholecystectomy pain

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic interventions have limited efficacy in sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) Type 3. Improved predictors of response to treatment are needed.

METHODS

Patients with postcholecystectomy pain underwent a standardized history and physical examination and were then managed individually. Long-term outcome was determined by record review and telephone interview. Initial predictors of response to treatment were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up for the 74 subjects was 36 months. Fifty were improved, and 24 had persistent pain. Patients were likely to respond to sphincterotomy if their pain was not continuous, if it was accompanied by nausea or vomiting, and if there had been a pain free interval after cholecystectomy of at least 1 year. When 2 or 3 of these predictors were present, 85% of SOD Type 2 patients and 56% of Type 3 patients had a good response. Initial history and examination features also predicted response to treatment of neuropathic pain.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with postcholecystectomy pain, specific features of the initial history and examination predict response to treatment with higher accuracy than the SOD grade. These predictors identify a subset of Type 3 patients likely to respond to sphincterotomy.

Diagnosing and treating Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a critical literature review and reevaluation

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is a pathologic syndrome, without considering etiology, physiopathology, or anatomic aspects of the condition. The clinical manifestations of the syndrome may be a consequence of an "organic stenosis" of the tract or a consequence of "abnormal motility" of the sphincter. Until some years ago, the gold standard technique for studying and treating this pathologic condition was endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Two criteria for defining patients in the Milwaukee classification are related to this procedure. The Milwaukee classification was introduced to use clinical and radiologic criteria to define patients with Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction to choose the best treatment. Subsequently, great emphasis has been placed on manometry of the sphincter performed by endoscopic cannulation. The enormous increase of cholecystectomies by means of laparoscopic technique has increased the number of patients who return to their reference-surgeon with a post-cholecystectomy pain and possible Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. The aim of this paper is to review the literature and to evaluate an up-to-date flow chart for diagnosing and treating the syndrome by using alternative diagnostic procedures that are less invasive than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Incomplete response to endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: evidence for a chronic pain disorder

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy of endoscopic treatment of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) remains controversial. Although some studies have shown a positive impact on patient symptoms after treatment, these reports have been largely qualitative and evaluated on short-term response. The aim of our study was to quantitatively measure the long-term outcomes of endoscopic therapy in patients with SOD.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with suspected SOD underwent selective sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM) of the biliary and/or pancreatic sphincter. Each patient completed a telephone-based survey measuring symptomatic pain before and after SOM +/- ES. The questioner was blinded to the results of SOM. The patients with normal SOM or SOD but who did not undergo ES served as controls.

RESULTS

Of these 33 patients (27 women, mean age 48.7 yr, range 13-74), 19 (57.5%) were found to have SOD (12 biliary, six pancreatic, one both). The average follow-up was 18.1 months (range 7-34). Of the patients with SOD, 17 (89%) underwent ES. At follow-up of the 19 patients undergoing ES, five were taking narcotics for persistent pain, two were taking antidepressants, and 15 identified the endoscopic therapy as the reason for their relief. Of the 14 controls, seven were taking narcotics, seven were taking antidepressants, and two identified the endoscopy as the reason for their relief; some patients were taking both antidepressants and narcotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients found to have SOD who undergo ES are more likely to be improved on long-term follow-up when compared with patients with suspected SOD but normal manometry without ES. However, almost uniformly, despite ES, patients continue to have pain, which is consistent with most chronic pain disorders and which suggests a multifactorial cause for the pain.