Structure and structure formation of the 20S proteasome

Structure of the proteasome

The ubiquitin-proteasomal system is an essential element of the protein quality control machinery in cells. The central part of this system is the 20S proteasome. The proteasome is a barrel-shaped multienzyme complex, containing several active centers hidden at the inner surface of the hollow cylinder. So, the regulation of the substrate entry toward the inner proteasomal surface is a key control mechanism of the activity of this protease. This chapter outlines the knowledge on the structure of the subunits of the 20S proteasome, the binding and structure of some proteasomal regulators and inducible proteasomal subunits. Therefore, this chapter imparts the knowledge on proteasomal structure which is required for the understanding of the following chapters.

Ischemic preconditioning-induced cardioprotection is lost in mice with immunoproteasome subunit low molecular mass polypeptide-2 deficiency

The ubiquitin-proteasome system plays an important role in many cellular processes through degradation of specific proteins. Low molecular mass polypeptide 2 (LMP-2 or beta(1i)) is one important subunit of the immunoproteasome. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) activates cell signaling pathways and generates cardioprotection but has not been linked to LMP-2 function previously. LMP-2 knockout mice (C57BL6 background) and wild-type C57BL6 mice were subjected to 30 min of ischemia (I-30) and 120 min of reperfusion (R-120) with or without preceding IPC (10 min of infusion and 5 min of reperfusion). IPC significantly increased left ventricular developed pressure and decreased infarct size in wild-type mice, but this protective effect of IPC was lost in LMP-2 knockout mice. IPC-mediated degradation of phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) and activation of the downstream protein kinase Akt were impaired in LMP-2 knockout hearts. The impairment of PTEN degradation was associated with defective immunoproteasomes and decreased proteolytic activities. When LMP-2 knockout mice were pretreated with the PTEN inhibitor bpV(HOpic), cardiac function was significantly improved, and myocardial infarct size was significantly reduced after I-30/R-120. In conclusion, LMP-2 is required for normal proteasomal function and IPC induction in the heart. Its action may be related to PTEN protein degradation.

Identification of differentially expressed proteins in spontaneous thymic lymphomas from knockout mice with deletion of p53

Background

Knockout mice with a deletion of p53 spontaneously develop thymic lymphomas. Two cell lines (SM5 and SM7), established from two independent tumours, exhibited about fifty to seventy two-fold differentially expressed proteins compared to wild type thymocytes by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE).

Results

Protein spots excised from 2D-PAGE gels, were subjected to in-gel tryptic digestion and identified by liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry. A total of 47 protein spots were identified. Immunological verification was performed for several of the differentially regulated proteins where suitable antibodies could be obtained. Functional annotation clustering revealed similarities as well as differences between the tumours. Twelve proteins that changed similarly in both tumours included up-regulation of rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 2, proteasome subunit α type 3, transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 3, mitochondrial ornithine aminotransferase and epidermal fatty acid binding protein and down-regulation of adenylosuccinate synthetase, tubulin β-3 chain, a 25 kDa actin fragment, proteasome subunit β type 9, cofilin-1 and glia maturation factor γ.

Conclusion

Some of the commonly differentially expressed proteins are also differentially expressed in other tumours and may be putative diagnostic and/or prognostic markers for lymphomas.

Drosophila proteasome regulator REGgamma: transcriptional activation by DNA replication-related factor DREF and evidence for a role in cell cycle progression

The proteasome regulator REG (PA28gamma) is a conserved complex present in metazoan nuclei and is able to stimulate the trypsin-like activity of the proteasome in a non-ATP dependent manner. However, the in vivo function for REGgamma in metazoan cells is currently unknown. To understand the role of Drosophila REGgamma we have attempted to identify the type of promoter elements regulating its transcription. Mapping the site of the transcription initiation revealed a TATA-less promoter, and a sequence search identified elements found typically in Drosophila genes involved in cell cycle progression and DNA replication. In order to test the relevance of the motifs, REGgamma transcriptional assays were carried out with mutations in the proposed promoter. Our results indicate that a single Drosophila replication-related element sequence, DRE, is essential for REGgamma transcription. To confirm that REGgamma has a role in cell cycle progression, the effect of removing REGgamma from S2 cells was tested using RNA interference. Drosophila cells depleted of REGgamma showed partial arrests in G1/S cell cycle transition. Immuno-staining of Drosophila embryos revealed that REGgamma is typically localized to the nucleus during embryogenesis with increased levels present in invaginating cells during gastrulation. The REGgamma was found dispersed throughout the cell volume within mitotic domains undergoing cell division. Finally, database searches suggest that the DRE system may regulate key members of the proteasome system in Drosophila.

A novel link between the proteasome pathway and the signal transduction pathway of the bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs)

BACKGROUND

The intracellular signaling events of the bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) involve the R-Smad family members Smad1, Smad5, Smad8 and the Co-Smad, Smad4. Smads are currently considered to be DNA-binding transcriptional modulators and shown to recruit the master transcriptional co-activator CBP/p300 for transcriptional activation. SNIP1 is a recently discovered novel repressor of CBP/p300. Currently, the detailed molecular mechanisms that allow R-Smads and Co-Smad to co-operatively modulate transcription events are not fully understood.

RESULTS

Here we report a novel physical and functional link between Smad1 and the 26S proteasome that contributes to Smad1- and Smad4-mediated transcriptional regulation. Smad1 forms a complex with a proteasome beta subunit HsN3 and the ornithine decarboxylase antizyme (Az). The interaction is enhanced upon BMP type I receptor activation and occur prior to the incorporation of HsN3 into the mature 20S proteasome. Furthermore, BMPs trigger the translocation of Smad1, HsN3 and Az into the nucleus, where the novel CBP/p300 repressor protein SNIP1 is further recruited to Smad1/HsN3/Az complex and degraded in a Smad1-, Smad4- and Az-dependent fashion. The degradation of the CBP/p300 repressor SNIP1 is likely an essential step for Smad1-, Smad4-mediated transcriptional activation, since increased SNIP1 expression inhibits BMP-induced gene responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our studies thus add two additional important functional partners of Smad1 into the signaling web of BMPs and also suggest a novel mechanism for Smad1 and Smad4 to co-modulate transcription via regulating proteasomal degradation of CBP/p300 repressor SNIP1.

Analysis of Drosophila 26 S proteasome using RNA interference

We have utilized double-stranded RNA interference (RNAi) to examine the effects of reduced expression of individual subunits of the 26 S proteasome in Drosophila S2 cells. RNAi significantly decreased mRNA and protein levels of targeted subunits of both the core 20 S proteasome and the PA700 regulatory complex. Cells deficient in any of several 26 S proteasome subunits (e.g. d beta 5, dRpt1, dRpt2, dRpt5, dRpn2, and dRpn12) displayed decreased proteasome activity (as judged by hydrolysis of succinyl-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-aminomethylcoumarin), increased apoptosis, decreased cell proliferation without a specific block of the cell cycle, and accumulation of ubiquitinated cellular proteins. RNAi of many individual 26 S proteasome subunits promoted increased expression of many non-targeted subunits. This effect was not mimicked by chemical proteasome inhibitors such as lactacystin. Reduced expression of most targeted subunits disrupted the assembly of the 26 S proteasome. RNAi of six of eight targeted PA700 subunits disrupted that structure and caused accumulation of increased levels of uncapped 20 S proteasome. Notable exceptions included RNAi of dRpn10, a polyubiquitin binding subunit, and dUCH37, a ubiquitin isopeptidase. dRpn10-deficient cells showed a significant increase in succinyl-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-aminomethylcoumarin hydrolyzing activity of the 26 S proteasomes but accumulated polyubiquitinated proteins. d beta 5-Deficient cells had a phenotype similar to that of most PA700-deficient cells but also accumulated low molecular mass complexes containing subunits of the 20 S proteasome, probably representing unassembled precursors of the 20 S proteasomes. Cells deficient in several of the 26 S proteasome subunits were more resistant to otherwise toxic concentrations of various proteasome inhibitors. Our data suggest that those cells adapted to grow in conditions of impaired ubiquitin and proteasome-dependent protein degradation.

Effect of high hydrostatic pressures on 20S proteasome activity

The 20S proteasome is the catalytic core of the ubiquitin proteolytic pathway, which is implicated in many cellular processes. The cylindrical structure of this complex consists of four stacked rings of seven subunits each. The central cavity is formed by two beta catalytic subunit rings in which protein substrates are progressively degraded. The 20S proteasome is isolated in a latent form which can be activated in vitro by various chemical and physical treatments. In this study, the effects of high hydrostatic pressures on 20S proteasome enzymatic activity were investigated. When proteasomes were subjected to increasing hydrostatic pressures, a progressive loss of peptidase activities was observed between 75 and 150 MPa. The inactivation also occurred when proteasomes were pressurized in the presence of synthetic peptide substrates; this may be the result of the dissociation of the 20S particle into its subunits under pressure, as was shown by PAGE. Pressurized proteasomes also lost their caseinolytic activity. In contrast, in the presence of casein, the pressure-induced inactivation and the dissociation of the 20S particles were prevented. In addition, in comparison to that observed at atmospheric pressure, their caseinolytic activity was increased under pressure. Following depressurization, the caseinolytic activity returned to basal levels but was further enhanced following an additional pressurization treatment. Thus, the structure of the 20S particle exhibits a certain degree of plasticity. This pressure-induced activation of the 20S proteasome is discussed in relation to its hollow structure, its currently accepted proteolytic mechanism and the general effect of high pressures on the biochemical reactions and structures of biopolymers.

GFP-labelling of 26S proteasomes in living yeast: insight into proteasomal functions at the nuclear envelope/rough ER

26S proteasomes are multisubunit protease complexes that play the central role in the ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation pathway. The proteolytically active core is formed by the 20S proteasome. Regulatory subunits, principally the 19S cap complex, confer the specificity towards ubiquitinated substrates and an ATP-dependence on proteolysis. Green fluorescence protein (GFP)-tagged versions of either an alpha-subunit of the 20S core or an ATPase subunit of the 19S cap complex were functionally incorporated into the protease complex, thus allowing to monitor the subcellular distribution of 26S proteasomes in living yeast. Our localization studies suggest that proteasomal proteolysis mainly occurs at the nuclear envelope (NE)/rough ER. Implications of proteasomal functions at the NE/rough ER are discussed in the context of published work on ER degradation and with regard to possible targeting mechanisms.

Intracellular proteinases of invertebrates: calcium-dependent and proteasome/ubiquitin-dependent systems

Cytosolic proteinases carry out a variety of regulatory functions by controlling protein levels and/or activities within cells. Calcium-dependent and ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent pathways are common to all eukaryotes. The former pathway consists of a diverse group of Ca(2+)-dependent cysteine proteinases (CDPs; calpains in vertebrate tissues). The latter pathway is highly conserved and consists of ubiquitin, ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, deubiquitinases, and the proteasome. This review summarizes the biochemical properties and genetics of invertebrate CDPs and proteasomes and their roles in programmed cell death, stress responses (heat shock and anoxia), skeletal muscle atrophy, gametogenesis and fertilization, development and pattern formation, cell-cell recognition, signal transduction and learning, and photoreceptor light adaptation. These pathways carry out bulk protein degradation in the programmed death of the intersegmental and flight muscles of insects and of individuals in a colonial ascidian; molt-induced atrophy of crustacean claw muscle; and responses of brine shrimp, mussels, and insects to environmental stress. Selective proteolysis occurs in response to specific signals, such as in modulating protein kinase A activity in sea hare and fruit fly associated with learning; gametogenesis, differentiation, and development in sponge, echinoderms, nematode, ascidian, and insects; and in light adaptation of photoreceptors in the eyes of squid, insects, and crustaceans. Proteolytic activities and specificities are regulated through proteinase gene expression (CDP isozymes and proteasomal subunits), allosteric regulators, and posttranslational modifications, as well as through specific targeting of protein substrates by a diverse assemblage of ubiquitin-conjugases and deubiquitinases. Thus, the regulation of intracellular proteolysis approaches the complexity and versatility of transcriptional and translational mechanisms.