Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis after major remission to taxane-based front-line therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer

Treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: current challenges and future opportunities

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) in breast cancer patients confers a uniformly poor prognosis and decreased quality of life. Treatment options are limited and often ineffective, due in large part to limitations imposed by the blood-brain barrier and the very aggressive nature of this disease. The majority of studies investigating the treatment of LM are not specific to site of origin. Conducting randomized, disease-specific clinical trials in LM is challenging, and much clinical outcomes data are based on case reports or retrospective case series. Multiple studies have suggested that chemo-radiotherapy is superior to either chemotherapy or radiation therapy alone. Attempts to overcome current obstacles in the treatment of breast cancer LM hold promise for the future. We review the epidemiology, diagnosis, and prognosis of LM in breast cancer, and discuss the treatment options currently available as well as those under investigation.

Resolution of extensive leptomeningeal metastasis and clinical spinal cord compression from breast cancer using weekly docetaxel chemotherapy

Metastatic breast cancer to the leptomeninges is a late event in the disease course and is associated with significant morbidity and a grave prognosis. Treatment typically involves direct intrathecal injection of chemotherapy into the cerebrospinal fluid compartment since systemic chemotherapy penetrates poorly to the central nervous system. Here we report an interesting clinical observation involving a patient presenting with leptomeningeal spread of breast cancer causing extensive spinal cord compression with obliteration of the subarachnoid space, thus precluding the use of direct intrathecal chemotherapy. We administered systemic chemotherapy using weekly docetaxel with complete radiographic resolution of her disease and recovery from clinical spinal cord compression. While this is a single clinical observation, weekly administration of docetaxel in this circumstance may have been associated with improved drug "escape" into the central nervous system and better antitumor effect. Because leptomeningeal disease is typically a late event in metastatic breast cancer, resistance to therapeutic intervention may reflect intrinsically resistant disease in the setting of extensive prior therapy rather than a routine problem with systemic drug delivery to the CNS. Studying patterns of disease relapse in patients who had received adjuvant weekly taxanes may provide insights into this hypothesis.

A subset of breast cancer predisposes to brain metastasis

This study evaluated the expression of biological markers of breast cancers with brain metastases. Eighteen paired tumors were assessed, with 42 non-brain-metastasizing breast cancers that were stained with ER, PR, HER2, CK5/6, p63, and Ki67, and were also classified into intrinsic subtypes. The expression patterns between the breast tumors with brain metastases were compared to the brain metastases and the controls. Breast cancers with brain metastases were of higher grade and showed higher incidence of lymph node metastases at initial diagnosis and higher EGFR, p63, and Ki67 expression. In the group of breast cancers with brain metastases, the brain metastases showed higher HER2, CK5/6, and Ki67 expression compared to the breast primaries. There was also a higher incidence of basal subtype and a lower incidence of luminal subtype. When tumors metastasized, changes in hormonal receptor (22%) and HER2 (6%) status were observed. We concluded that breast cancers with higher grade, lymph node involvement at diagnosis, high EGFR, p63, and Ki67 expression, and of basal subtype were at higher risk for brain metastases, and that both hormonal receptors and HER2 status may change in brain metastases.

Brain metastases in breast cancer: prognostic factors and management

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze the overall survival of patients with brain metastases due to breast cancer and to identify prognostic factors that affect clinical outcome.

METHODS

Of the 7,872 breast cancer patients histologically diagnosed with breast cancer between January 1990 and July 2006 at the Asan Medical Center, 198 patients with solitary or multiple brain metastases were included in this retrospective study. Central nervous system (CNS) lesions were diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients with leptomeningeal or dural metastases without co-existent parenchymal metastatic lesions were excluded in this study. We reviewed the medical records and pathologic data of these 198 patients to characterize the clinical features and outcomes.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients at the diagnosis of brain metastases was 45 years (range 26-78 years). Fifty-five patients (28%) had a single brain metastasis, whereas 143 (72%) had more than two metastases. A total of 157 (79.2%) patients received whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). A total of 7 (3.6%) patients underwent resection of solitary brain metastases, 22 (11%) patients underwent gamma-knife surgery, three patients underwent intrathecal chemotherapy (1.5%) and 9 (4.6%) patients received no treatment. The overall median survival time was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 4.7-6.5 months) and 23.1% of the patients survived for more than 1 year. The median overall survival time was 5.4 months for patients treated with WBRT, 14.9 months for patients treated with surgery or gamma-knife surgery only, and 2.1 months for patients who received no treatment (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (relative risk (RR) = 0.704, 95% CI 0.482-1.028, P = 0.069), number of brain metastases (RR = 0.682, 95% CI 0.459-1.014, P = 0.058), treatment modalities (RR = 1.686, 95% CI 1.022-2.781, P = 0.041), and systemic chemotherapy after brain metastases (RR = 1.871, 95% CI 1.353-2.586, P < 0.001) were independent factors associated with survival.

CONCLUSION

Although survival of breast cancer patients with brain metastases was generally short, the performance status, number of brain metastases, treatment modalities and systemic chemotherapy after brain metastases were significantly associated with survival. Patients with single-brain metastasis and good performance status deserve aggressive treatment. The characteristics of initial primary breast lesions did not affect survival after brain metastasis.

Predominance of the basal type and HER-2/neu type in brain metastasis from breast cancer

Although breast cancer is the second most common cause of central nervous system (CNS) metastases with a notable increase of incidence, only few studies on brain-metastasizing breast cancer are available. In this immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study, metastases to the CNS (n=85) and primary breast cancers, with known involvement of the CNS (n=44) including paired primary and metastasized tumours (n=23), were investigated retrospectively for the expression of oestrogen- (ER) and progesterone- (PR) hormone receptors, Her-2/neu, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Ki-67, and cytokeratins (CKs) 5/14. The majority of brain metastases were steroid hormone receptor negative (ER 66%, PR 82%) corresponding to the findings in primary tumours with known involvement of the CNS (68% ER-negative, 75% PR-negative). The frequency of HER-2/neu-overexpressing or -amplified cancers was increased in both groups (34 and 32%, respectively). EGFR expression was more frequent in metastases (41%) than in primary tumours (16%). The proportions of cases with a basal phenotype were 26 and 30%, respectively. In paired primary tumours and metastases to the CNS, constancy of Her-2/neu status was observed in 87% of cases with only one sample turning Her-2/neu-negative and two samples acquiring overexpression/amplification in brain metastases. In contrast, steroid hormone receptors exhibited more frequently a loss of expression (17%) than a gain (9%) with 74% revealing a constant phenotype. We conclude that brain-metastasizing breast cancer belongs predominantly to the basal type or Her-2/neu type. Primary and metastatic tumours differ from each other only in a minority of cases, leading rather to a loss of steroid hormone receptors and to a gain of EGFR and Her-2/neu.

Intramedullary spinal cord metastases in breast cancer: report of four cases and review of the literature

Intramedullary spinal cord metastases (ISCM) are usually the result of rapidly progressing systemic cancer. Breast cancer represents one of the most common solid tumors associated with the development of ISCM at rather advanced stages of disease. In the present report we describe four new cases with advanced breast cancer developing ISCM. All cases presented herein indicated that ISCM is a late manifestation of disseminated breast cancer. Three of these patients had been treated for approximately 1-3 years for metastatic disease. Once ISCM developed, concurrent asymptomatic brain metastases were detected in one case, concurrent symptomatic brain disease (cerebellar) was present at the time of cervical ISCM diagnosis in another patient, and in another case, ISCM developed metachronously at 18 months after the diagnosis of symptomatic brain metastases treated by whole brain radiotherapy. One of these cases had brain metastases at presentation, while at relapse developed leptomeningeal carcinomatosis treated successfully, but followed shortly, as a terminal event, by ISCM and parenchymal brain recurrence. All but one patient experienced a rather rapidly evolving disease course leading to death after 2-5 months from widespread neuraxis dissemination of their cancer, while one patient is still alive 6 months after the diagnosis of ISCM. All four cases, added to the list of the anecdotally reported cases of ISCM after breast cancer, undermine the ominous prognosis and limited treatment options available for this disease manifestation, and an extensive literature review and discussion of similar cases is provided.

Central nervous system metastases in women after multimodality therapy for high risk breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Central nervous system (CNS) relapse is increasing in breast cancer. This increase may reflect altered failure patterns from adjuvant therapy, more effective systemic therapy with improved control in non-CNS sites, or a resistant breast cancer subtype.

METHODS

To determine the factors associated with clinical CNS relapse, we examined response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (chemosensitivity), time to relapse and sites of relapse in a cohort of 140 patients without evidence of metastasis at presentation.

RESULTS

At 5 years (interquartile range 3-6 years), 44 (31%) patients developed distant metastases, including 13 with CNS metastases. CNS relapse was early (median 24 months after diagnosis) and associated with relapse in bone and liver, suggesting hematogenous dissemination. Those with CNS relapse were younger at diagnosis (40 versus 49 years) and more likely to have lymphovascular invasion in the primary tumor compared with non-CNS metastases. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not different (69% versus 73% response rate) between the two groups. Extent of residual disease after chemotherapy was strongly associated with relapse outside the CNS but not CNS relapses. The CNS was an isolated or dominant site of metastasis in 8 of 13. Despite treatment, most patients with CNS involvement died of neurologic causes a median of 6 months later.

CONCLUSION

Breast cancers that develop CNS metastases differ from those that develop metastases elsewhere. Both tumor behavior and reduced chemotherapy accessibility to the CNS may contribute to increased CNS involvement in breast cancer patients treated with multimodality therapy.

Posterior fossa metastases: risk of leptomeningeal disease when treated with stereotactic radiosurgery compared to surgery

INTRODUCTION

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) represents a diffuse form of central nervous system metastatic disease that is often associated with poor quality of life and prognosis. Our objective was to compare the incidence of LMD in patients with posterior fossa metastases (PFM) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus surgical resection.

METHODS

The medical records of 93 patients aged 57.9 +/- 10.8 years (mean +/- SD) with PFM treated at the Cleveland Clinic from 1995 to 2001 were analyzed retrospectively. Treatments consisted of surgery with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) or SRS with or without WBRT. The impact of age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) at presentation, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class, status of extracranial disease, number, size, volume, pathology of brain metastases and steroid use were studied using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

There were 80 evaluable patients (10 lost to follow-up and three excluded for supratentorial surgery with subsequent LMD). LMD occurred after the surgical removal of the PFM in 9 of 18 patients (50%), whereas LMD occurred after SRS in 4 of 62 patients (6.5%) (p = 0.0028). Multivariate analysis also showed that patients who had surgery were more likely to develop LMD compared to patients treated with SRS (p = 0.0024). Patients had a median KPS decline of 30 points after LMD was diagnosed. There was no statistically significant difference in survival of patients with LMD and the rest of the patients (13.5 vs. 11.7 months, p = 0.7659). Patients treated surgically had significantly larger lesions (3.43 +/- 0.74 vs. 1.96 +/- 0.95 cm maximum diameter, p < 0.0001). All surgical patients belonged to RPA class II at diagnosis. Their survival was not different from the RPA class II patients in the SRS group. Surgery and SRS had comparable complication rates (8.1% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.99), although the surgical complications were more serious (e.g. hemorrhage, CSF leak). The duration of steroid use was longer after SRS compared to surgery (2.1 +/- 3.6 vs. 1.3 +/- 2.4 months); however, the difference was not statistically significant. Myopathy and psychosis in one patient after SRS, were the only steroid-related complications. There was no statistically significant association between the primary tumor type and the presence of LMD.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis of patients with PFM, SRS was associated with a lower incidence of LMD than was surgery. Although LMD was associated with rapid and considerable decline in the quality of life, it did not influence the overall survival. SRS was associated with less serious complications than surgery. Surgery in this study was performed on patients with larger lesion sizes and a trend toward poorer initial performance status, which could bias these results. A prospective study directly comparing surgery and SRS and further evaluating the significance of LMD in PFM is warranted.

Leptomeningeal metastases

Leptomeningeal metastasis, also known as neoplastic meningitis, carcinomatous meningitis, and meningeal carcinomatosis, occurs when cancer cells gain access to cerebrospinal fluid pathways, travel to multiple sites within the central nervous system, settle, and grow. This disease has become an increasingly important late complication in oncology as patients survive longer, develop more brain metastases, and newer chemotherapies fail to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. The hallmark of clinical presentation is a cancer patient who complains of focal neurologic dysfunction and is found to have multifocal signs on neurologic examination. The clinical course is relentlessly progressive; treatment is limited and cures are the subject of case reports. This article reviews the clinical course of leptomeningeal metastasis and addresses recent developments in its pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

Increased rate of brain metastasis with trastuzumab therapy not associated with impaired survival

Trastuzumab is important for treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients with tumors that overexpress HER2/neu, but its penetration to the brain is poor. The aims of this study are to determine the prevalence of bone and brain metastasis during therapy, to compare the survival of breast cancer patients with brain metastasis who received trastuzumab to those patients not receiving trastuzumab, and to assess the impact of brain metastasis on the overall survival of trastuzumab patients. Of 103 patients treated with trastuzumab, 16 had brain metastasis and 43 had bone metastasis at the beginning of trastuzumab. The control group consisted of 196 patients with metastatic breast cancer who had never received trastuzumab. Six had brain metastasis and 75 had bone metastasis at the beginning of therapy. During therapy, only 9 of 60 trastuzumab patients (15%) developed bone metastasis, while 170 of 186 control patients (91%; c2 = 129.8, P < 0.0001) developed bone metastasis. In addition, 22 of 87 trastuzumab patients (25%) and 58 of 190 control patients (31%) subsequently developed brain metastasis. Control patients without brain metastasis experienced significantly better survival (median survival = 928 days) than those with brain metastasis (median survival = 639 days, c2 = 8.34, P < 0.005). There was no difference in survival for trastuzumab-treated patients if they acquired brain metastasis (median survival = 1400 days) or no brain metastasis (median survival > 2000 days, c2 = 0.12, P > 0.05). Patients receiving trastuzumab were unlikely to develop new bone metastasis but were as likely as control patients to develop brain metastasis. However, patients who developed brain metastasis experienced better survival compared with those patients with brain metastasis who never received trastuzumab.