Significant enhancement of gastric mucin content after rabeprazole administration: its potential clinical significance in acid-related disorders

Epithelial protective therapy in comorbid diseases. Practical Guidelines for Physicians

In 2021 the first multidisciplinary National Consensus on the pathophysiological and clinical aspects of Increased Epithelial Permeability Syndrome was published. The proposed guidelines are developed on the basis of this Consensus, by the same team of experts. Twenty-eight Practical Guidelines for Physicians statements were adopted by the Expert Council using the "delphic" method. Such main groups of epithelial protective drugs as proton pump inhibitors, bismuth drugs and probiotics are discussed in these Guidelines from the positions of evidence-based medicine. The clinical and pharmacological characteristics of such a universal epithelial protector as rebamipide, acting at the preepithelial, epithelial and subepithelial levels, throughout gastrointestinal tract, are presented in detail.

Deprescribing and Optimal Selection of Proton Pump Inhibitors (Contributions of the 26th United Russian Gastroenterology Week)

Aim. Presentation of the Forum “Deprescribing and optimal selection of proton pump inhibitors” held in Moscow on 29 September 2020 during the 26th United Russian Gastroenterology Week.Key points. The Forum was aimed at discussing issues associated with improving the proton pump inhibitor (PPIs) therapy in treatment and prevention of acid-related diseases and upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) disorders induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and antiplatelet medications. Deprescribing is considered to be an effective strategy of a motivated reduction of the PPI dosage, duration of therapy and the patient’s transfer from a regular to on-demand intake regimen. The choice of PPI may condition an optimal therapy for acid-related diseases.Conclusion. PPIs prevail in therapies for acid-related diseases and NSAID-induced upper GIT lesions. PPI deprescribing should be a strategy of choice if medically indicated. A non-enzymatic metabolism, high acid suppression, stable antisecretory effect from day 1 of therapy and cytoprotective action justify the application of rabeprazole (Pariet®) for optimising therapies for acid-related diseases and implementing the deprescribing strategy.

A slippery slope: On the origin, role and physiology of mucus

The mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract, eyes, nose, lungs, cervix and vagina is lined by epithelium interspersed with mucus-secreting goblet cells, all of which contribute to their unique functions. This mucus provides an integral defence to the epithelium against noxious agents and pathogens. However, it can equally act as a barrier to drugs and delivery systems targeting epithelial passive and active transport mechanisms. This review highlights the various mucins expressed at different mucosal surfaces on the human body, and their role in creating a mucoid architecture to protect epithelia with specialized functions. Various factors compromising the barrier properties of mucus have been discussed, with an emphasis on how disease states and microbiota can alter the physical properties of mucus. For instance, Akkermansia muciniphila, a bacterium found in higher levels in the gut of lean individuals induces the production of a thickened gut mucus layer. The aims of this article are to elucidate the different physiological, biochemical and physical properties of bodily mucus, a keen appreciation of which will help circumvent the slippery slope of challenges faced in achieving effective mucosal drug and gene delivery.

[Possibilities for optimization of eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in modern clinical practice]

A steady decline in the effectiveness of standard eradication therapy (ET) regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection necessitates a search for ways of their optimization, by enhancing the efficiency of treatment protocols and by improving their safety and tolerability. The review systematizes the data available in the literature on main accessible methods for optimizing ET regimens. Among the optimization methods that can considerably enhance the efficiency of ET regimens, one may identify their addition of a bismuth agent (by 10-20%), the use of rebamipide (by 11.9%), adjuvant therapy with probiotics (by 8.1-13%), or double-dose proton pump inhibitors (by 8%). Only adjuvant therapy with probiotics results in a significant decrease in the incidence of side effects from ET. In posteradication period, rebamipide should be used to potentiate gastric mucosal repair and to regress inflammatory processes.

Impairment of salivary mucin production resulting in declined salivary viscosity during naproxen administration as a potential link to upper alimentary tract mucosal injury

OBJECTIVES:

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) contribute to the esophageal mucosal injury through its direct topical impact on the luminal aspect of the surface epithelium. Its indirect, systemic impact, however, on salivary component of the esophageal pre-epithelial barrier remains to be explored. Therefore, salivary mucin secretion and viscosity at baseline and during naproxen-placebo, as well as naproxen-rabeprazole, administration were investigated.

METHODS:

Twenty-one asymptomatic volunteers were included in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover designed study. Salivary samples were obtained in basal and pentagastrin-stimulated conditions (6 mg/kg s.c.) mimicking the food-stimulated conditions. Patients received 7 days of naproxen-placebo or naproxen-rabeprazole with a 2-week washout period in between. Salivary mucin content and viscosity were measured before and after treatment using periodic acid/Schiff's methodology and Cone/Plate Digital Viscometer, respectively.

RESULTS:

The rate of salivary mucin secretion in basal condition declined by 32% during administration of naproxen-placebo (11.3±1.7 vs. 16.8±3.3 mg/h). Salivary mucin secretion in pentagastrin-stimulated condition declined significantly (by 34%) during the administration of naproxen-placebo (13.6±1.5 vs. 20.7±3.0 mg/h; P<0.05). Viscosity significantly decreased after naproxen-placebo administration in basal (by 60%) and stimulated conditions (by 56%) (P<0.001). Coadministration of rabeprazole at least partly restored the naproxen-induced decline of salivary mucin in basal condition (by 8%), and pentagastrin-stimulated conditions (by 30%).

CONCLUSIONS:

A significant decline of salivary mucin and viscosity during administration of naproxen may at least partly explain a propensity of patients on chronic therapy with NSAIDs to the development of esophageal mucosal injury and complications. In addition the trend to restorative capacity of rabeprazole on the quantitative impairment of salivary mucin during administration of naproxen may potentially translate into its tangible clinical benefit but it requires further investigation.

Rabeprazole impedes the development of reflux-induced esophageal cancer in a surgical rat model

BACKGROUND

The role of proton pump inhibitors in Barrett's metaplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma has been an area of controversy.

AIMS

We evaluated the effectiveness of the proton pump inhibitor rabeprazole as a chemoprevention agent in a surgical rat reflux model of esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The rat reflux model was created by performing a jejuno-esophagostomy on Sprague-Dawley rats. The surgery promoted the reflux of gastro-duodenal contents into the esophagus. Rabeprazole sodium (Eisai, Tokyo, Japan) was dissolved in 0.9% physiological saline to a desired concentration of 1.5% (W/V). Beginning 4 weeks post-surgery, all animals were administered either 0.2 ml per 100 g body weight injections of rabeprazole or equivalent injections of saline 3 days per week into the subcutaneous tissue of the back. Forty animals were killed 40 weeks after surgery and their esophagi were examined. Of these, 23 were included in the control group, while the remaining 17 were subjected to rabeprazole.

RESULTS

While 74% (17/23) of the controls developed esophageal cancer, animals administered rabeprazole had an incidence of cancer of 29% (5/17) (p < 0.05, Fisher's exact test). Barrett's metaplasia was found on 100% (23/23) of the rats in the placebo group, but there was a protective effect in the rabeprazole group with 65% (11/17) of the rats displaying signs of Barrett's metaplasia (p < 0.05, Fisher's exact test). All of the rats developed proliferative hyperplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Rabeprazole protected against the development of esophageal cancer in a clinically relevant surgical reflux model. Rabeprazole warrants further investigation for potential clinical use as a chemoprevention agent.

Comparative study of proton pump inhibitors on dexamethasone plus pylorus ligation induced ulcer model in rats

The present study was designed to compare ulcer protective effect of proton pump inhibitors viz. omeprazole, rabeprazole and lansoprazole against dexamethasone plus pylorus ligation induced ulcer model. Dexamethasone (5 mg/kg) was used as an ulcerogen. Dexamethasone suspended in 1% CMC in water was given orally to all the rats 15 min after the pylorus ligation. Omeprazole (20 mg/kg), rabeprazole (20 mg/kg), and lansoprazole (20 mg/kg) were administered by oral route 30 min prior to ligation was used for ulcer protective studies, gastric secretion and mucosal studies. Effects of proton pump inhibitors were determined by the evaluation of various biochemical parameters such as ulcer index, free and total acidity, gastric pH, mucin, pepsin and total proteins. Oral administration of proton pump inhibitors showed significant reduction in gastric acid secretion and ulcer protective activity against dexamethasone plus pylorus ligation induced ulcer model. The % protection of omeprazole, rabeprazole and lansoprazole was 84.04, 89.36 and 79.78, respectively. Rabeprazole significantly inhibited the acid-pepsin secretion and increased the gastric mucin secretion. The observations made in the present study suggest that rabeprazole is the most effective gastric antisecretory and ulcer healing agent as compared to omeprazole and lansoprazole.

Significant increase of esophageal mucin secretion in patients with reflux esophagitis after healing with rabeprazole: its esophagoprotective potential

Esophageal mucin secretion in patients with reflux esophagitis (RE) is significantly impaired. Rabeprazole augments gastric mucin secretion. We have studied, therefore, the effect of rabeprazole on esophageal mucin secretion in patients with RE. The study was conducted in 15 patients with RE treated with rabeprazole (20 mg QD) for 8 weeks. Esophageal secretions were collected during consecutive infusions of initial NaCl, HCl/Pepsin (HCl/P), and a final NaCl, using a specially designed esophageal catheter, before and after therapy. Mucin was measured using standard methodology. After rabeprazole administration esophageal mucin concentration as well as secretion increased during perfusion with initial saline (P < 0.01), HCl/P (P < 0.02), and concluding saline (P < 0.001). Stimulation of esophageal mucin secretion by rabeprazole may indicate that the mechanisms governing its secretion are similar to those implicated in gastric mucin output. Enhancement of esophageal mucin secretion by rabeprazole may translate into esophagoprotective potential in patients with reflux esophagitis.

Rebamipide, a cytoprotective drug, increases gastric mucus secretion in human: evaluations with endoscopic gastrin test

We have previously developed a rapid, simple endoscopic method for evaluating gastrin-stimulated maximal acid output (the endoscopic gastrin test, EGT). In EGT, gastric fluid newly secreted over 10 min after gastrin stimulation is collected under direct endoscopic visualization. In this study, employing the EGT, we evaluated the effect of rebamipide, a cytoprotective anti-ulcer drug, on gastric mucus secretion. In ten Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy volunteers, gastric juice was collected by EGT prior to and after 4-week administration of rebamipide. The collected gastric juice was subjected to analysis for gastric mucus output. Total gastric mucin output was significantly increased by 53% by rebamipide administration from 3.2 +/- 1.2 mg hexose/10 min to 4.9 +/- 2.2 mg hexose/10 min (P < 0.01). Further analysis by ion-exchange chromatography revealed that rebamipide administration induced a specific increase in acidic mucin rich in sialic acid. Applying EGT, this study demonstrated that rebamipide administration increased gastric mucus secretion in human.

Management of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity: focus on proton pump inhibitors

The association between NSAIDs and the presence of upper gastrointestinal (GI) complications is well established. Evidence that acid aggravates NSAID-induced injury provides a rationale for minimizing such damage by acid suppression. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) appear to be very effective in treating NSAID-related dyspepsia, and also in healing gastric and duodenal ulcers in patients continuing to receive the NSAID. An analysis of data from comparative studies of PPIs versus ranitidine, misoprostol and sucralfate shows a therapeutic advantage in favour of the PPI. Several studies now confirm the efficacy of co-therapy with PPIs in the short- and long-term prevention of NSAID-induced upper GI injury. PPIs are more effective than histamine H(2)-receptor antagonists at standard dosages in reducing the risk of gastric and duodenal ulcer, and are superior to misoprostol in preventing duodenal but not gastric lesions. However, when balancing effectiveness and tolerance, PPIs may be considered the treatment of choice in the short- and long-term prevention of NSAID-related mucosal lesions. To date, there are only a few published articles dealing with the role of PPIs in the prevention of upper GI complications. Recent epidemiological and interventional studies provide some evidence that PPIs are of benefit. However, more controlled studies using clinical outcomes are needed to establish the best management strategy (PPIs combined with traditional NSAIDs or with cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitors) especially in patients with multiple risk factors, in patients using concomitant low-dose aspirin, corticosteroids or anticoagulants (high risk group), or in patients with a history of ulcer complications (very high risk group). Furthermore, it should be underlined that Helicobacter pylori infection positively interacts with the gastroprotective effect of PPIs; therefore, the true efficacy of these drugs in preventing NSAID-related ulcer complications should be reassessed without the confounding influence of this microorganism.

Proton pump inhibitors: an update of their clinical use and pharmacokinetics

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) represent drugs of first choice for treating peptic ulcer, Helicobacter pylori infection, gastrooesophageal reflux disease, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastrointestinal lesions (complications), and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

RESULTS

The available agents (omeprazole/esomeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole) differ somewhat in their pharmacokinetic properties (e.g., time-/dose-dependent bioavailability, metabolic pattern, interaction potential, genetic variability). For all PPIs, there is a clear relationship between drug exposure (area under the plasma concentration/time curve) and the pharmacodynamic response (inhibition of acid secretion). Furthermore, clinical outcome (e.g., healing and eradication rates) depends on maintaining intragastric pH values above certain threshold levels. Thus, any changes in drug disposition will subsequently be translated directly into clinical efficiency so that extensive metabolizers of CYP2C19 will demonstrate a higher rate of therapeutic nonresponse.

CONCLUSIONS

This update of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical data will provide the necessary guide by which to select between the various PPIs that differ-based on pharmacodynamic assessments-in their relative potencies (e.g., higher doses are needed for pantoprazole and lansoprazole compared with rabeprazole). Despite their well-documented clinical efficacy and safety, there is still a certain number of patients who are refractory to treatment with PPIs (nonresponder), which will leave sufficient space for future drug development and clinical research.

Gastric mucosal levels of prostaglandins and leukotrienes in patients with gastric ulcer after treatment with rabeprazole in comparison to treatment with ranitidine

AIM

Prostaglandins (PGs) and leukotrienes (LTs) are major factors involved in the defense of the gastric mucosa against ulcer formation. However, little is still known about the gastromucosa-protecting action of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine H(2) receptor antagonists (H(2) blockers) in patients with gastric ulcer. We therefore examined the effectiveness of a PPI in protecting the gastric mucosa.

METHODS

We compared the PGE(2) and LTB(4) levels and the expression levels of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2 mRNA in the gastric mucosa in gastric ulcer patients between the group treated for 8 weeks with a PPI, rabeprazole (PPI group; n=5), and the group treated for 8 weeks with an H(2) blocker, ranitidine (H(2) blocker group; n=6), as well as in nonulcer subjects (control group; n=5).

RESULTS

The mucosal levels of PGE(2) and COX-2 mRNA expression were significantly lower in the ulcer patients than those in the nonulcer patients, whereas the LTB(4) level was significantly higher in the ulcer patients than that in the nonulcer patients, and it was also significantly lower in the ulcerated mucosa than that in the nonulcerated mucosa. The PPI group had a significantly increased PGE(2) and decreased LTB(4) levels in comparison to the H(2) blocker group during the ulcer-healing stage. The COX-1 mRNA expression showed no difference among the PPI and H(2) blocker groups or between before and after the treatment. However, the COX-2 mRNA expression increased in the PPI group more than that in the H(2) blocker group during the ulcer-healing stage.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrated the significant gastric-mucosa-protecting effect of PPI by increasing the PGE(2) production and reducing the LTB(4) production.

Restorative impact of rabeprazole on gastric mucus and mucin production impairment during naproxen administration: its potential clinical significance

Rabeprazole augments gastric mucus and mucin production in humans. However, its potential restorative impact on gastric mucus and mucin production impairment, resulting from administration of naproxen, remained to be explored. Therefore, we measured the content of mucus and mucin in gastric juice (GJ) before and after administration of naproxen with rabeprazole or placebo. The study was approved by HSC at KUMC and conducted in 21 asymptomatic, H. pylori-negative volunteers in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. The content of gastric mucus in GJ, after exhaustive dialysis and complete lyophilization, was assessed gravimetrically, whereas the content of mucin was measured after its purification with equilibrium density-gradient ultracentrifugation in CsC1. Gastric mucus secretion during administration of naproxen with placebo declined significantly both in basal (by 44%; P < 0.001) and in pentagastrin-stimulated (by 35%; P < 0.001) conditions. Coadministration of rabeprazole significantly restored the naproxen-induced impairment in mucus production in basal conditions (by 47%; P < 0.01) and by 22% during stimulation with pentagastrin. Gastric mucin secretion during naproxen/placebo administration also declined significantly in both basal (by 39%; P < 0.01) and stimulated (by 49%; P = 0.003) conditions. Rabeprazole also significantly restored the naproxen-induced decline of gastric mucin output during pentagastrin-stimulated conditions (by 67%; P = 0.003) and by 40% in basal conditions (P = 0.05). The restorative capacity of rabeprazole on the quantitative impairment of gastric mucus and mucin during administration of naproxen may translate into a clinical benefit of protection of the upper alimentary tract from NSAID-related mucosal injury.

Review article: pH, healing and symptom relief with rabeprazole treatment in acid-related disorders

Control of gastric acid secretion by antisecretory agents has been the cornerstone of therapy in the successful management of all acid-related disorders, including gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and duodenal and gastric ulcer. Treatment efficacy has been strongly correlated with degree and duration of acid suppression within the 24-h period and with total duration of therapy. All proton pump inhibitors are highly effective for the healing of ulcers and erosive oesophagitis. All have closely similar mechanisms of action, yet important pharmacological differences exist, which can significantly impact certain aspects of their clinical efficacy. Rabeprazole's rapid activation over a wide pH range may be the explanation for its early onset of effective acid inhibition compared with other proton pump inhibitors such as omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole. Like rabeprazole, esomeprazole is also a potent inhibitor of gastric acid at steady state, although it is thought that rabeprazole may provide enhanced first-day acid suppression compared with esomeprazole. First-day antisecretory efficacy should produce faster symptom relief, a hypothesis supported by clinical data. Moreover, drugs with pharmacological profiles that include both rapid onset and potent antisecretory effects should help control healthcare costs by reducing the need for otherwise commonly used twice-daily proton pump inhibitor administration.

Effect of a single oral dose of rabeprazole on nocturnal acid breakthrough and nocturnal alkaline amplitude

AIM: To study the effect of rabeprazole (RAB) on nocturnal acid breakthrough (NAB) and nocturnal alkaline amplitude (NAKA) and to compare it with omeprazole (OME) and pantoprazole (PAN).

METHODS: By an open comparative study, forty patients with active peptic ulcer were randomly assigned to receive one of the three PPIs (proton pump inhibitor) with a single oral dose. They were divided into RAB group (10 mg), OME group (20 mg) and PAN group (40 mg). Twenty healthy volunteers were enrolled to the control group (without taking any drug). Intragastric pH monitoring was then performed 1 h before and 24 h after the dose was given.

RESULTS: No clinically undesirable signs and symptoms possibly attributed to the administration of RAB or OME and PAN were recognizable throughout the study period. All subjects completed the study according to the protocol. All data were processed by a computer using the Student t test or t’ test followed by an analysis of covariance. P < 0.05 was considered to have statistical significance. The intragastric pH of NAB was significantly higher in RAB group (1.84 ± 0.55) than in either OME group (1.15 ± 0.31) or PAN group (1.10 ± 0.30) (both P < 0.01). RAB produced a longer sustaining time (4.65 ± 1.22 h) on NAKA than OME (3.22 ± 1.89 h) (P < 0.05), PAN (3.15 ± 1.92 h) (P < 0.05), and the sustaining time of NAKA in RAB group was longer than that in the healthy control group (P < 0.01) too. In addition, RAB produced a much higher pH on NAKA (6.41 ± 0.45) in comparison with PAN (6.01 ± 0.92) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: A single oral dose of 10 mg RAB may increase the pH of NAB and shorten the sustaining time of NAB, and it may increase the pH of NAKA as well as prolong the sustaining time of NAKA.