Composite grafts in the treatment of osteosarcoma of the proximal humerus

Graft Infections in Biologic Reconstructions in the Oncologic Setting: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: Biologic graft infection (BGI) is one of the main complications in graft reconstructions. However, very little evidence exists regarding the epidemiology of BGI, as most of the data come from sparse reports. Moreover, most of the series did not detail the treatment and outcome of graft infections. The aim of this systematic review of the literature is to provide a comprehensive data collection on BGI after oncologic resections. Methods: Three different databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched for relevant articles, and further references were obtained by cross-referencing. Results: 139 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 9824 grafts were retrieved. Among these, 684 (6.9%) were in the humerus, 365 (3.7%) in the pelvis, 2041 (20.7%) in the femur and 1660 (16.8%) in the tibia. Most grafts were osteoarticular (2481, 26.7%) and intercalary 2112 (22.7%) allografts. In 461 (5.0%), vascularized fibula grafts (VFGs) were used in combination with recycled autografts. Recycled grafts were reported in 1573 (16.9%) of the cases, and allograft-prosthetic composites in 1673 (18.0%). The pelvis and the tibia had the highest incidence of BGI (20.4% and 11.0%, respectively). The most reported first treatment was debridement and implant retention (DAIR) in 187 (42.8%) cases and two-stage revision with graft removal in 152 (34.8%). Very little data are reported on the final outcome specified by site or type of graft. Conclusions: This systematic review of the literature confirms a high incidence of infections in biologic reconstructions after resections of primary bone tumors. Despite DAIR being a viable attempt, in most cases, a two-stage approach with graft removal and reconstruction with endoprosthesis presented the highest chance to overcome infection, guaranteeing a reconstruction. We emphasize the need for future multicentric studies to focus on the management of infections after biological reconstructions in bone sarcomas.

Complications and functional outcomes after reconstruction of the proximal humerus with allograft-prosthetic composite: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Allograft prosthetic composite (APC) reconstruction is performed after resection of proximal humerus tumors or failure of arthroplasty implants. There is limited literature on the postoperative outcomes of this technique. We sought to assess implant survival, failure rates, and postoperative functional outcomes after APC reconstruction of the proximal humerus.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases was conducted. The study was registered on PROSPERO (ID: 448,663). The Strengthening of the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist was used for quality assessment. Implant failure was determined using the Henderson classification for biological reconstruction. Functional outcome was primarily assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score at last follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies with a total of 488 patients were included. Mean follow-up in reporting studies ranged from 2.5 to 10 years. Five-year revision-free survival for implants ranged from 41% to 92%. Overall implant failure rate ranged from 9% to 54%, and reoperation rate ranged from 0% to 55%. Graft host nonunion (type 2) was the most common mode of failure, with rates ranging from 0% to 75%. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores at last follow-up ranged from 57% to 90% across studies. A trend towards better functional outcomes was seen in patients having an APC with a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) compared with those with hemiarthroplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

APCs show promise in proximal shoulder reconstruction, with heterogeneous functional outcomes that are noninferior to other reconstruction techniques. Graft host nonunion is a common mode of failure and remains a concern in this type of prosthesis. Future studies should compare rTSA-APCs and rTSA endoprostheses while controlling for potential confounders.

Allograft Prosthesis Composite (APC) for Proximal Humeral Bone Loss: Outcomes and Perspectives

(1) Background: Allograft prosthetic composite (APC) represents one of the techniques used for reconstruction in large proximal humeral bone deficits. The present systematic review aimed at summarizing the state of the art of the technique and analyzing its outcomes. (2) Methods: The PRISMA guidelines were followed to perform this systematic review. A systematic electronic search was performed using PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases. All the studies analyzing the rates of allograft prosthesis composite were pooled, and the data were extracted and analyzed. (3) Results: A total of 10 studies were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review for a total of 239 patients. The rate of patient satisfaction with surgery was reported in 7 studies with a mean of 86.4% ± 13.64. The mean constant score was 45.7 ± 3.51, the mean ASES score was 63.58 ± 8.37, and the mean SST was 4.6 ± 1.04. The mean revision rate observed was 10.32% ± 3.63 and the mean implant survival was 83.66% ± 14.98. (4) Conclusions: Based on the currently available data, allograft prosthesis composite represents a valuable option for the reconstruction of proximal humeral deficits. All studies analyzed showed the favorable impact of this surgical technique on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Megaprosthesis versus Allograft Prosthesis Composite for massive skeletal defects

Massive skeletal defects are encountered in the setting of tumors necessitating excision, failed total hip arthroplasty with periprosthetic bone loss, periprosthetic fracture, complex trauma, multiple failed osteosynthesis and infection. Reconstruction of the segmental defects poses a tremendous challenge to the orthopaedic surgeons. The goal of osseous reconstruction of these defects is to restore the bone length and function. Currently the most commonly employed methods for reconstruction are either a megaprosthesis or an Allograft Prosthesis Composite (APC). Megaprosthesis, initially created for the treatment in neoplastic pathologies are being used for the non-neoplastic pathologies as well. The longevity of these implants is an issue as majority of the patients receiving them are the survivors of oncologic issue or elderly population, both in which the life expectancy is limited. However, the early complications like instability, infection, prosthetic breakage and fixation failure have been extensively reported in several literatures. Moreover, the megaprostheses are non-biological options preventing secure fixation of the soft tissue around the implant. The Allograft Prosthesis Composites were introduced to overcome the complications of megaprosthesis. APC is made of a revision-type prosthesis cemented into the skeletal allograft to which the remaining soft tissue sleeve can be biologically fixed. APCs are preferred in young and low risk patients. Though the incidence of instability is relatively low with the composites as compared to the megaprosthesis, apart from infection, the newer complications pertaining to APCs are inevitable that includes non-union, allograft resorption, periprosthetic fracture and potential risk of disease transmission. The current review aims to give an overview on the treatment outcomes, complications and survival of both the megaprostheses and APCs at different anatomic sites in both the upper and lower limbs.

Effect of anatomic site and irradiation on the rates of revision and infection of allograft-prosthesis composites after resection of a primary bone tumor: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction after resection of a primary bone tumor may have theoretical advantages, such as restoration of bone stock and soft tissue attachments. However, the reported results of APC of different anatomical sites differ widely. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the revision and infection rates associated with allograft-prosthesis composite (APC) reconstructions after resection of a primary bone tumor. We looked for variables, such as anatomic sites and irradiation of the allograft, associated with these outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was the revision rate, and the secondary outcome was the infection rate. Random effects meta-analyses of single proportions were used to estimate pooled rates of events. Meta-regression models were built to assess the effect of moderators on relevant both outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were included: 9 about acetabulum APC, 9 about proximal femur APC, 4 about proximal tibia APC, and 9 about proximal humerus APC. The revision rates ranged from 16 % (95 % CI 10-25 %) for proximal humerus to 38 % (95 % CI 26-52 %) for acetabulum, and were significantly different between anatomic sites (p = 0.028). The infection rates ranged from 8 % (95 % CI 4-16 %) for proximal humerus to 23 % (95 % CI 16-33 %) for proximal tibia and 23 % (95 % CI 15-35 %) acetabulum APCs, and were significantly different between anatomic sites (p = 0.008). Finally, we found that irradiation of the allograft was significantly associated with revision rates (p = 0.033) and infection rates (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of an APC reconstruction after resection of a primary malignant bone tumor vary significantly between anatomic sites and after irradiation of the allograft.

Survivorship of bipolar fresh total osteochondral ankle allograft

BACKGROUND

Severe posttraumatic ankle arthritis poses a reconstructive challenge in the young and active patient. Bipolar fresh total osteochondral allograft (BFTOA) may represent an intriguing alternative to arthrodesis and prosthetic replacement. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the outcomes of BFTOA performed through an anterior approach to the ankle and to investigate the parameters influencing the results.

METHODS

A total of 26 patients (18 males and 8 females with a mean age of 34.9 ± 7.7 years) underwent BFTOA. The allograft was prepared with the help of specifically designed jigs and the surgery was performed using a direct anterior approach. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months after the operation, and at a mean 40.9 ± 14.1 months of follow-up. Radiographic evaluation included the measurement of allograft size matching and alignment.

RESULTS

The AOFAS score improved from 26.6 ± 6 preoperatively to 77.8 ± 8.7 after a mean follow-up of 40.9 ± 14.1 months (P < .0005). Six failures occurred. Joint degeneration was classified as 2 in 12 and as 3 in 14 patients. A statistically significant correlation between low degrees of distal tibial slope and better clinical outcomes was observed (P = .049).

CONCLUSION

BFTOA appears to be a viable option to arthrodesis or arthroplasty. Precise allograft sizing, stable fitting, and fixation and delayed weight-bearing were key factors for a successful outcome. In this series the correct alignment of the tibial graft, in terms of slope, was found to play a crucial role in the allograft survivorship.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Osteochondral Allografts in the Ankle Joint: State of the Art

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review is to report about the clinical use of partial and total fresh osteochondral allograft in the ankle joint. The state of the art of allografts with regard to basic science, procurement and storage methods, immunogenicity, generally accepted indications and contraindications, and the rationale of the allografting procedure have been described.

METHODS

All studies published in PubMed from 2000 to January 2012 addressing fresh osteochondral allograft procedures in the ankle joint were identified, including those that fulfilled the following criteria: (a) level I-IV evidence addressing the areas of interest outlined above; (b) measures of functional, clinical, or imaging outcome; and (c) outcome related to ankle cartilage lesions or ankle arthritis treated by allografts.

RESULTS

The analysis showed a progressively increasing number of articles from 2000. The number of selected articles was 14; 9 of those focused on limited dimension allografts (plugs, partial) and 5 on bipolar fresh osteochondral allografts. The evaluation of evidence level showed 14 case series and no randomized studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Fresh osteochondral allografts are now a versatile and suitable option for the treatment of different degrees of osteochondral disease in the ankle joint and may even be used as total joint replacement. Fresh osteochondral allografts used for total joint replacement are still experimental and might be considered as a salvage procedure in otherwise unsolvable situations. A proper selection of the patients is therefore a key point. Moreover, the patients should be adequately informed about the possible risks, benefits, and alternatives to the allograft procedure.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the management of failed shoulder arthroplasty with proximal humeral bone loss: is allograft augmentation necessary?

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty frequently have deficient proximal humeral bone stock. Proximal humeral allograft has been recommended to augment reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) to improve stability and function. This study reports the results of RTSA without proximal humeral allograft in patients with proximal humeral bone loss secondary to failed shoulder arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2005 to 2008, 251 patients were enrolled in a prospective RTSA cohort study. Significant humeral bone loss was demonstrated in 15 of 56 undergoing revision for failed arthroplasty. Average age was 67 years. Average bone loss measured 38.4 mm (range, 26-72 mm). Patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Constant Score (CS), and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, as well as self-reported satisfaction and radiographs.

RESULTS

Patients demonstrated significant improvement in mean CS (23.0 to 44.2), ASES (38.2 to 68.3), ASES activities of daily living (7.0 to 15.9), SSV (19.2 to 75.8), and VAS pain (4.6 to 1.6) scores. Thirteen of 15 patients reported satisfaction (87%). Range of motion improved in forward flexion (38.3° to 103.2°) and external rotation (-0.5° to 11.9°). Radiographs demonstrated notching in 3 patients (20%), no humeral subsidence or loosening, and prosthetic fracture of 1 modular humeral stem.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of RTSA for failed shoulder arthroplasty and deficient humeral bone stock provides a significant clinical benefit without the need for allograft augmentation. Monoblock humeral component use may diminish risk for prosthetic fracture.

Evolution of surgical treatment for sarcomas of proximal humerus in children: retrospective review at a single institute over 30 years

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus, although a common site for primary bone sarcomas, finds scant mention in literature as far as options and outcome of reconstruction in the skeletally immature skeleton are concerned. Reconstruction after resection of proximal humeral sarcomas in the immature skeleton poses specific challenges to the surgeon, and there has been a definite evolution of these techniques over the decades. We studied the evolution and compared the outcome of various techniques for such reconstruction over 3 decades at a single institution.

METHODS

All 61 children younger than 13 years of age and treated for a primary sarcoma of the proximal humerus at Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, from 1976 to 2006 were studied for techniques of resection and reconstruction, complications, surgical procedures needed during follow up, and functional and radiologic outcomes during and at final follow-up. The functional outcomes after various procedures were compared using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system.

RESULTS

A definite trend from amputation in the first decade, to the use of nonbiological reconstruction (endoprostheses, K nail cement spacer) in the second and biological reconstruction (vascular proximal fibula autograft, osteoarticular allograft, and allograft prosthesis composite) in the third decade was seen. There was a trend of improvement in the functional outcome over the 3 decades, although the complication rates and the need for repeated surgical procedures remained a major problem in all the techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction of proximal humerus after resection for sarcomas is a challenging task. Although endoprostheses do have a definite role to play in reconstruction of proximal humerus in children, the use of biological techniques in well-selected patients is being carried out more often now than before, as is reflected in this series, with a potentially improved functional outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-Retrospective comparative study.

Bipolar fresh osteochondral allograft of the ankle

BACKGROUND

Severe post-traumatic ankle arthritis poses a reconstructive challenge in the young and active patient. Bipolar fresh osteochondral allograft (BFOA) may represent an intriguing alternative to arthrodesis and prosthetic replacement. The aim of this study was to describe a lateral trans-malleolar technique for BFOA, and to evaluate the results in a case series.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2004 to 2006, 32 patients, mean age of 36.8 +/- 8.4 years, affected by ankle arthritis underwent BFOA with a mean followup of 31.2 months. The graft was prepared by specifically designed jigs, including the talus and the tibia with the medial malleolus. The host surfaces were prepared by the same jigs through a lateral approach. The graft was placed and fixed with twist-off screws. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 2, 4, and 6 month after operation, and at a minimum 24 months followup. A biopsy of the grafted areas was obtained from 7 patients at 1-year followup for histological and immunohistochemical examination.

RESULTS

Preoperative AOFAS score was 33.1 +/- 10.9 and postoperatively 69.5 +/- 19.4 (p < 0.0005). Six failures occurred. Cartilage harvests showed hyaline-like histology with a normal collagen component but low proteoglycan presence and a disorganized structure. Samples were positive for MMP-1, MMP-13 and Capsase-3.

CONCLUSION

The use of BFOA represents an intriguing alternative to arthrodesis or arthroplasty. We believe precise allograft sizing, stable fitting and fixation and delayed weightbearing were key factors for a successful outcome. Further research regarding the immunological behavior of transplanted cartilage is needed.

Revision arthroplasty with use of a reverse shoulder prosthesis-allograft composite

BACKGROUND

Patients with disabling pain and loss of shoulder function with associated proximal humeral bone loss following shoulder arthroplasty have limited reliable treatment options. Our objective was to report the results, obtained as part of a prospective outcomes study, of the use of a reverse shoulder prosthesis-allograft composite in these patients.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2005, 353 patients treated with a reverse shoulder prosthesis were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Twenty-five patients received, in addition, a proximal humeral allograft for the management of severe proximal humeral bone loss, and they comprise the study group. The average bone loss measured 53.6 mm (range, 34.5 to 150.3 mm). Patients were followed clinically with use of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and a scale with which the patients rated their satisfaction, and they were followed radiographically to detect mechanical failure, loosening, notching, and graft healing. All patients were followed for a minimum of two years (average, 30.2 months).

RESULTS

The total average ASES score improved from 31.7 points preoperatively to 69.4 points at the time of follow-up (p < 0.0001), and the average SST score improved from 1.4 to 4.5 points (p < 0.0001). Nineteen patients (76%) reported a subjective good or excellent result, five reported a satisfactory result, and one reported that the result was unsatisfactory. The range of motion improved in forward flexion (from 32.7 degrees to 82.4 degrees ; p < 0.0001), abduction (from 40.4 degrees to 81.4 degrees ; p < 0.0001), and internal rotation. Radiographic evaluation at the time of final follow-up showed incorporation of the allograft in the metaphyseal region in 84% (twenty-one) of the twenty-five patients and incorporation of the allograft in the diaphyseal region in 76% (nineteen) of the patients. Four patients had complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a reverse shoulder prosthesis-proximal humeral allograft composite for the treatment of shoulder dysfunction following arthroplasty associated with substantial proximal humeral bone loss has shown promising early results. The allograft may restore proximal humeral bone stock, thereby helping to maintain the height of the prosthesis bone construct and thus deltoid tension. Additional, long-term studies are needed to evaluate the longevity of this construct.